The OTC-X1 architecture is solved, now -- again this represents an engineering solution for development.
It's a rough basis, with multiple testing ranges.
It uses Tesla, Bedini, and Biefeld-Brown active-medium dielectric-electret power cell technology.
Examine the articles below, and understand the wiring, engineering, and physics.
Self-regenerating over-unity as well as testing options using external power source are presented and detailed.
Central Accumulator is a stable design with alternating magnet layers inside, and dielectric-electret layers, in two halves with or without a spark gap in the center, with outer magnetic housing, wound in a resonance coil.
Utrons are still having multiple designs, but are considered at least to be hollow with electrolyte, or with dielectric-electret material, layered or not, two halved, with or without a coil winding .. a lot of people have different ideas about the utrons, so it's been examined in detail.
Capacitor plate construction is generalized with having a dielectric-electret active medium material or some kind of bifilar electromagnet and/or di-electric arrangement.
An electret is the electrostatic equivalent to a magnet and is dielectric (Biefeld-Brown). Yes, it makes energy reactionlessly, making electromagnetic current (as well as having electrostatic field characteristics -- see: Hutchison power cell construction, the "Electret - Basic Reactionless Free Energy" article on the Free Energy / Tesla page which shows that sometimes AC and electrostatic force fields in such crystal power cells can accidentally form), and will last for hundreds if not thousands of years if made well.
Multiple test configurations are possible.
This technology is now to the point where it can be built without having to figure out so many aspects of it, because all of that is done now. It should be easy to test variations of the craft, and various aspects of electrogravity and negative energy theory pertaining to electrogravity.
It's been suggested that this technology be combined with old technology to make more efficient rockets, and that is what will be allowed.. And some people are really stubborn about that and like most people FAIL TO UNDERSTAND SOME COMMON SENSE BASICS.
For one thing, this architecture of mass reduction and rotating fields, which involves concepts of field densities, are not compatible with rockets, due to their shape. Dynamic electrogravity makes use of density fields like how a boat or airplane flies, not rockets.
Em drive, the Cannae drive, are slight lift engines (unless you look real closely at what these new rockets sporting that electrogravity aurora behind them are doing; then they might not be slight lift engines; although I'm not saying the ARE electrogravity auroras per se, as the electric space drives do not give off a visible plasma exhaust, however there is some speculation about that regardless, and I just wanted to mainly note that the technology of rockets all over the world has truly changed because they used to never give off the plasma plumes before . . . ). Saucer shapes make use of a theory of rotating and counter-rotating magneto-electrostatic inertial forces using mass-reduction fields. The shape MUST be allowed, because it is the only type of technology that we have been building toward since the early 1900's and late 1800's, OTHER THAN the tall pyramid-shaped Vimanas.
IT IS LIKE PULLING TEETH to have any real conversation with people about these things without them resorting to ego and trying to shut the conversation up by saying their advice is the best advice and no discussion is allowed.
However, sometimes my ego gets in the way. I'm working on that. It should be known that I am not able to get to any OTC-X1 style of experimental testing for some time, because of that Tesla tower Ley-line project, and that PODS EXIST COMPRISED OF OTC-X1 ENGINEERS WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING ON THIS PROJECT.
Granted, that's not saying much since only two people have ever built partial models.
HOWEVER ... It has been suggested basically, to demonstrate in public, some kind of antigravity levitation using these concepts of co-counter-rotating magneto-electrostatic charges. And, it has been suggested to demonstrate at least a working rotating OTC-X1 motor, even if it doesn't levitate, but just to understand and witness (so to be able to believe in) it as a motor.
Some people have told me that the best way to proceed is to build a fleet of 12 drones and use AI to steer them, because that would be allowed otherwise the secret space program groups, various ET and Earth security forces wouldn't allow an actual craft. Ok... Well for one thing, let me address this, I do not trust AI, and if it has taken me all this time to figure out warp drive physics, why would it not take me a super long time to figure out anything else, AND I have yet to see any AI applications that are trustworthy.. I would not know how to integrate such a thing.
And this is one of the reason why I have a very hard time talking with secret space program veterans (Although I have no comment as far as my own possible involvement in that area).
Everyone seems to have their own ideas, and only their ideas should be valid, and no one else's ideas matter at all.
This has gotten me on the defense mode really hard-core, and it's affecting my demeanor and writing style. People keep shooting down my ideas, but don't know what they're talking about. So ...
This is my proposal:
This is considered scientific research. This is warp drive research, energy research, antigravity (and electro-gravity engine) research and development.
None of this is known in the public, it is not taught in any university, and people are moving into private arenas to develop this technology that has been stolen from us over the past scores of decades.
We the people have been continually harrassed, stolen from, threatened, targetted, tracked, and denied entry into these realms of what the breakaway civilization monopolizes by use of force.
Currently, some people are coming out with their technologies in public, and are not being threatened, not being harassed, not being targeted, but they are not attempting patents, or market-level entry of their technology. It is considered for research purposes.
I'm not going to continue to argue with people over these policies and/or mysterious treaties that we never did know about or agree to, and are unknown to us, to the point where said policies and/or mysterious treaties are speculative only. It is historical fact that people have been targeted, suppressed, threatened, and even killed for attempting market-level entry of their technology, and mass-production of it, starting with one thing: attempting to obtain a patent.
I have said before that patents are not proof of working technology.
Please read the Clandestine Disclosure website concerning the nature of "disclosure."
Let me quickly explain about patents: Any time someone applies for patent, they are registering it under an authority that then holds that technology, resulting in the inventor giving up a portion of ownership. The patent applicant enters into contract with the UNITED STATES CORPORATION giving them permission (if you have to ask for permission, you do not therefore have ownership rights) to "protect" the invention as property under the guise that you never had the right prior to establishing your own ownership in the first place.
When conflict arises, those who have a patent versus those who can claim original creation and invention of whatever is in dispute become two different jurisdictions that are incompatible and unalike (maxim of law: like versus like). This is why things have a hard time going on the market, because under market conditions, you're dealing with the PERSON (corporate fiction), and CORPORATION (fiction; non-living being), as those instruments which hold rights. A living man or woman have no rights, because to have rights, you must claim an authority over your own free will to grant you rights that otherwise, what is natural to a living being, one does not have to ask permission to do, such as thinking, or choosing, or walking, or traveling, or eating, existing, or creating things and owning things. As such "unalienable" and "natural" rights are those natural functions of life that one has the free will to do as a living being -- to denote the distinction here.
This is where the SYSTEM breaks down in violation of natural law, AND in violation of contract law because no contract is valid without full disclosure. These things are not disclosed when one applies for a patent, therefore applying for a patent is an invalid contract to begin with, enforceable only because people presume it so, or believe it holds value.
PRESUMPTION is an aspect of law, in that it is presumed that the PERSON (name in all capital letters, on drivers license and birth certificate, but is not a living being, and is not who you are, but instead it is a CORPORATE TRUST, with social security number being the account number of the CORPORATE TRUST -- of the PERSON) agrees with every STATUTE automatically without regard to giving consent, because it is an agreement made with the PERSON (the CORPORATE FICTION), not the living man or woman or child ...
... I do not talk about Law in public, usually, to such extent, but this is basic knowledge, and explains why patents are able to be classified, held for decades, and covered up.
People need to evolve, especially in two particular ways: technological advancement, and spiritual / consciousness levels of advancement. These two aspects are intertwined and inseparable. Trade and exchange for value levels of commerce (common is the root word) can exist in ways of private contract for the purpose of Human survival (restoration of the planetary bio-systems, eco-systems, and Human life-systems).
The policies of the Clandestine Disclosure and Ralph Ring pod groups are that no one has a voice, or say-so, unless they are actively working on these technologies, in some way, shape, or form, actively engineering and testing these technologies that ultimately involve the OTC-X1 project, which THAT ultimately involves warp drive technology, energy technology, and metaphysical aspects of thought and intentional-piloting aspects of advancement and Human development.
If people are too afraid to participate, and they let their fears rule their lives, then you are NOT an evolving member of the Human specie.
This must go in a direction of exclusive and private development BUT it needs to be shown in public, for the benefit of all life on Earth, and ultimately our relations with life beyond the Earth.
The SYSTEM that currently exists on Earth is changing slowly, because that which cannot be sustained in a higher aspect of civilization will also evolve. In the meantime there are unknowns to this process, but it is generally agreed upon by defense, military, and political bodies, as well as the public sector, that disclosure and evolution is mandatory for our survival.
I don't know how else to put this but we've got a wiring solution, energy technologies, physics, engineering, all revealed (maybe not "disclosed," using that choice of wording, but I would say that they are disclosed at this point), able to be researched, and able to go into a true development phase of work.
Be a Full Participant.
I would not worry about a patent at all, because the science is not even demonstrated, yet. Yes, we are all broke and starving, and don't want to let go of precious money even if it means the survival of life.
Any kind of a patent is going to become classified, but systems based on research and stated and demonstrated in public, is the expression of a researcher's vested interest, regardless, and is a process of science that is so far appearing to be allowed. The first approach to honoring life, is to honor other people's research and development, otherwise, it is not clear that the Human specie can survive if money is valued over living energy biology and conscious and ALIVE ... Life.
I hope these parameters are clear, and I encourage you.. no I DISCOURAGE you from telling other people that THEY need to be doing this work, when YOU are perfectly capable of doing so on your own with an entire array of knowledge at your fingertips with which to proceed. And as I have said repeatedly, I will get on this project when I am done with my other project involving the energies that make warp drive a reality -- as such has been requested of the public by DARPA to submit proposals for warp drive technology. How can any proposal be submitted, if it is unknown and untested? Otherwise it isn't a proposal, it is speculation only.
If you plan to make money from this, the only thing I can suggest is to make yourself known as a successful engineer, OR successful in the ability to replicate and duplicate from what plans and schematics and theory that is presented in the domain of: anywhere in the public that such information can exist (obviously anywhere else, might as well not even exist unless there's sufficient evidence to show that it might exist, but yet the engineering of it is not yet known).
Patents have been released of zero point energy, the TR-3B flying antigravity triangle, and such ... but to be able to replicate such technology in part, and test the engines, is what will put your name on the board, and establish vested interest that can potentially be profitable not just monetarily, but to life itself.
This is a proposal that you can share to anyone who challenges you on what you want to do, involving these areas mentioned above. I have also been told that the practice of killing scientists coming out with advanced technology is now frowned upon, and not policy, although holistic doctors and healers are still being killed, and the body count there is at least over a hundred, at this date. Research this if you don't believe me.
Since we the people have been pushing for disclosure, and there is no effort to establish any set public policy, then there can at least be the establishment of private and exclusive directives concerning these developments that are otherwise in constant debate, going nowhere, while people are sitting on their thumbs waiting for something instead of being an active participant in the co-creation of our planetary reality. This is a scary thing to say but ... I don't know how else to put it any more realistically than this.
Disclosures and releases of related technologies will be forthcoming here at this site eventually, at least on my end, and of any worthy individual or group that contributes to the highest good of all life, and of life on this planet. Feel free to contact this administration at the email provided below on the footer of this page. But do not abuse this privilege.
By: Administrator of the LAU Trust, Drew Dowling
It seems that, to beat suppression of free energy, inventors are selling plans to individuals for individual use only.
There is a contract signed there. Agreements to build for other people have to be in the form of special licenses, with a percentage of the sales. Such a license can be a yearly fee assuming say... X Number of devices will be sold (depending upon the contractor's expectations) ... or a 3 year contract for building, renewable if so desired, but if not renewed, then the builder will lose authorization to build for others' benefit, and the builder cannot build more than stated in the contract per year. And it should be known it is a private contract since applying for a patent may result in suppression of technology.
Some are actually doing this. I've thought a lot about this over the years, too. There has to be proof that it works, however. That must be accomplished through videos and a series of videos.
I'm mainly talking about the Tesla-tower Ley-line, here. But, this can also be the case for electrogravity models, and specifically models because anything else would be another contract, due to different variation of construction. But the video has to be shown first.
If it is too much a risk to apply for a patent because we KNOW it's going to be suppressed because that's what happens ... then evolution is our ownly choice, for those who care.
And as I'm thinking about this, I got to thinking "well, how easy would it be to build an OTC-X1, or otherwise experimental and compatible device just to test the principles involved?" And I found this:
Along with these, there ... in variations of materials including steel .. for like $5 bucks, or $10 bucks ...
Granted, it's not a magnetic housing though. .... But OMG.. really?? Steel is ferrous, that might account for something. If you want higher electromagnetic resonance frequency, use steel instead of aluminum. Zinc-plated steel works well, too ... especially in ... other ... technologies. In the central accumulator, you want high frequency and high magneto-static potential -- just my two cents, take it or leave it.
Utrons HAVE to be aluminum, or copper (a tad more expensive, but much more versatile, and is what the EM drive is made of), otherwise if they are steel, they'll lock up at the electromagnets.
Of course, no one EVER looks at this website and attempts to understand the technology and physics ...
You'd think that this is like placed in our laps purposefully.
Charging a little cash would help to recoup the cost of development, though. ... That is after all, only fair trade.
I wrote out a long discourse for this but .. Enforceable contracting and licenses and things like that would require hiring bounty hunters or investigators, or enforcing licences through the STATE, but the bottom line is that the reality of the situation is that ... no one is working on this technology other than like 2 people (but there's a lot of utron tests which go nowhere on Youtube), and there's no real reason to assume that these projects would ever go big-time. And furthermore, if they do, then it's regulation city, permit city, and maybe necessary disclosure of advanced secret space program space-warfighters, to keep people honest.
Bottom line also, this is scientific research, no bones about it. We just don't know! Theoretically we know. Some things are known. Most things are known. Maybe.
I know this though: seeing all those cones makes me happy.
Theoretically and experimentally so far EVERYTHING CHECKS OUT. That's a bold statement to make, I realize that. I just didn't want to have to depend on historical cover-ups to get all my information, because I wanted to earn that through physics, and explain it so that it can be known through logic and reason and engineering, that we have a faster-than-light ship on our hands. These physics are on the same page as Eric Dollard, Tesla, Carr, Tom Bearden, Townsend Brown, and others. We're all talking about the same things, the same mechanisms, and I think this is guaranteed to work. This is breakthrough physics.
I'm satisfied that no stone is left unturned. I love it when the work one does is confirmed by other people's works, when you run across them and see they are saying the exact same things you are saying. I've done a LOT of experiments and measurements, and I'm ASTOUNDED in that what I've discovered ultimately leads to this! It's cool that I've done all this in full view of the world, all my failures and all my successes. The hard part is over with, now. I had NO IDEA that the original Tesla tower experiments could have ever lead to this .. well, that's what I was intended actually BUT .. to be validated by others is the best feeling in the world.
Please, join in the OTC-X1 and electrogravity construction project. Eventually videos of completed projects will be released and BRIEFLY explained with options for private contracting in various forms. Please be a full participant.
It was important that all of this had to be known prior to starting construction.
Probably the most astounding thing about all this is the paradox of mass and time and gravitation and inertia -- the paradox of energy, and the unification of energy as infinite light.
The overunity effect of electrical energy, negative energy, to reduce mass and speed up time and cancel inertia and thus create a negative-gravitation effect of that which resembles pure light . . . and to do this with a machine that uses the living energy of the universe . . . and to figure this out in 5 years from what little about relativity and electronics and physics that I already knew . . . that we can take energy that is being constantly created in an electret form, a crystal power cell, and from that energy that is being created to unify it to where mass is not the byproduct of the separation of time, where gravity is not created from that separation, but negated from that unification, so that inertia becomes something that is of a higher dimension, of the inertia of pure intention and thought-direction without boundaries of speed or a limitation of distance.
This is truly what we are looking at, here. Most people 20 years ago could not possibly understand it, or even imagine it; and yet, here it is; if I can understand it, so can others.
And . . . I absolutely have to say this also....
One of my favorite arguments is about perpetual motion. Forget about overunity, that's been done, it's been proven, it's currently in use and viewable for all to see, and forget about the creation of energy for the moment, even though electrets create energy, and matter is a form of energy, and the universe is filled with infinite and unimaginable amounts of energy ... just forget about all that for the moment ... and forget about fuel-less electro-inertial space drives in use on satellites and rockets and whatnot, let's just forget about that too ... let's look at the best example of perpetual motion in a closed system, that of the Earth's revolution age after age around the sun. It's been doing it for billions of years, perpetuating its own orbital motion around the sun for billions of years.
This is so rudimentary that our current sciences just do not acknowledge .. No. Let me rephrase, our sciences DO acknowledge it. It's just that scientists don't acknowledge it, and they deny it. Yet to have a warp drive or hyperdrive, obviously these primitive beliefs of "energy cannot be created or destroyed," or "overunity cannot exist because energy cannot be created," or "the total energy of the universe is zero" are so obtuse ... negative energy plus positive energy does not equal zero energy, I'm sorry, it's just not that way. Energy cannot be destroyed, that much is true.
The primitive knowledge of this Earth society of Human scientists is astounding to infinite magnitude.
One of the best pieces of advice I have taken to heart over the years is: "never argue with a flat Earther." It doesn't matter how much evidence, geometry, science, math, physics you can give them. They will NEVER understand ... unless they get out into space and see for themselves. They won't ever do that though, because it would require that their identity that they have created for themselves would then be invalid. At that point, only Pure Love could save them from their own immediate self-destruction ... and yet such self-destruction is only the illusion of the mind, because the mind is very powerful.
The good news about this, is that I'm meeting more people these days who are intelligent enough so that when you show them evidence, proof, and technology, they immediately go silent -- just nothing but the sound of crickets . . .
The universe was created, and is constantly being created, even though the Big Bang is a bit of a misunderstanding, it's the scientists' construct of creation (and there's a lot of phenomenal math that geometrically supports such a construct, even though as our sciences have evolved, we now see things differently). Matter is created from pure light, and when matter unifies, it becomes light again. Our sciences show this.
The creation of energy is boundless, and infinitely diverse in the forms of material that energy becomes. All matter is 1/2 light, vibrating as pure energy; there is no real solid substance that is not energy, and our sciences show this. Very many people already know this . . . It's just the "scientists" who are in denial of it, and who knows how long they will continue to choose ignorance over knowledge. "To the fool, knowledge is ignorance, and that is his food." -- Thoth
The process of science is to test, experiment, duplicate, etc; 5 points of the scientific method. I just can't believe that scientists are so ignorant. It could be however, that science itself has been usurped, taken over, and perpetuated by the search engines that are not coming from true scientists, and is instead the perpetuation of lies, coming from those who have the money to attempt to keep the entire world in ignorance and oblivion. For example, it is known that the smart meters and 5G wireless systems use harmful EMF. Scientists are aware of this, yet some of them choose to follow the scent of money instead of what is truly profitable to life.
It's the SYSTEM which controls Human science -- the university systems, the corporate systems, the scent of money that keeps unscrupulous and evil people in power; ignorance is the purest form of evil.
No system based on the destruction of life can be sustained, obviously, because such a system cannot sustain the life of that which it is built to maintain. When a system no longer upholds the value of the life that it serves, then evolution becomes the reality. People create the system, and people give the SYSTEM power, often times by giving up their own.
As we witness the decay of our civilization, we witness the inevitability of yet another Renaissance not of reason this time, although there is that too, but of energy and light as the Truth becomes that which holds the most value, because it is the Truth that is given its value by Life.