It occurs to me that this whole mess can be simplified for an easy and quick test.
It occurred to me that a Bedini setup and a complex wiring setup might over-complicate things, although the power system is going to have to go SOMEWHERE, and a Bedini system will be the solution. That can be worked out easily enough, but just for a test, this is what we're looking at.
To explain: On (1), there are two central resonance coils, with an actuating coil of a few turns wound around each resonance coil. This is powered by a DC induction coil to obtain a static sparky output. On both coils, arrange it to that the positive static charge (you can feel it) is in the center.
Induction coil output leads have a couple of bare wires hooked to it so that there can be a sparky output. The positive and negative leads are drawn off those bare wires and connected to the actuating coils around the two resonance coils.
Standard outer electromagnets, and standard wiring from Walter's video "wiring the OTC-X1."
The positive magnetostatic pole is dead center, negative poles on the outer perimeter, and on top and bottom. Positive and north poles; negative and south poles.
On (2): a central resonance coil within a capacitor stack. However, the resonance coil needs to be wound around the Central Accumulator in configuration (3) below. When DC is applied to a secondary coil of a few turns wound around it, then only one end will have a static sparky output, which is the top end. North and South poles aligned with positive and negative poles.
Outer standard electromagnets on C-shaped block.
These two examples use longitudinal magnetostatic resonance, between electromagnetic fields, at the zero point of the electromagnet field planes.
The central accumulator capacitor is there to increase the voltage.
It's just too simple. Hardly anything to it, really.
The co-counter rotational spins of the OTC-X1 engine are playing an important role in establishing the vortex flows. This image directly above of the Haunebu II is meant as a comparison.
For those who already have OTC-X1 engines built, it's a matter of a few hours to test this, as long as you procure a good induction coil, but you may have to make your own capacitor out of tin foil in a Tupperware box, which is an easy thing to do. Use vegetable oil as the electrolyte, and it'll be good for a few tests before it'll blow out one side.
Regarding the utrons:
Haven't really gotten there yet. But you're dealing with the electromagnets spinning the accumulator/utron frame (the disk). The utrons can be charged, too, and they can spin.
In the Tribute to Bedini article, there is a motor that uses a spinning magnet in such a way that it generates power (which might work, who knows), and so it is reasonable to assume that the utrons, when charged and spinning, also create an energy field, as Walter Braumgartner observed (see the Clandestine Disclosure website).
The utrons have to spin, and they have to be charged, and it wouldn't hurt them to be charged magneto-electrostatically as well, which would conduct true electricity to the c-shaped electromagnets without a buildup of electron mass, which is according to some special physics I've been in correspondence about.
Utrons are hollow with electrolyte, and/or coiled, see the Warp Drive News page for details, and see the Clandestine Disclosure website.) The Clandestine Disclosure website recommends an electrolyte mixture of mercury/cesium/rubidium. DO NOT USE MECURY ALONE IN ALUMINUM UTRONS, because the mercury will dissolve the aluminum. The electrolyte mixture, make sure it renders the mercury inert (it should), and DO NOT TOUCH THE MERCURY, it absorbs straight through the skin and is extremely toxic and causes insanity if entered into your bloodstream.
Regarding the central accumulator:
A resonance coil can be wound around the central accumulator and charged with electromagnetic inductive collapse. Yes. That is the original concept, after all.
Oh yes. The crew will be safe because they're inside a faraday cage. In the original OTC-X1, the crew space was insulated from the outer hull by an air gap. See how the Haunebu II is designed? Think of the top toroid coil as being substituted for the crew compartment. There was an antenna in some diagrams of the OTC-X1 going through the crew compartment. Just insulated it inside a metal sleeve.
Townsend Brown style di-electrics can be employed too, see the Updates and Design Improvement page, the "Major Design Shift Involving Plasma Flows" article.
Note the circulation field in (2), which circulates around the hull to the bottom and feeding back through the capacitor, similar to the Haunebu II design.
Regarding (1), This illustrates magneto-static longitudinal resonance and collapse to the center.
The electromagnets can use a collapsing pulse frequency, fed through the utron coils.
We all know how simple the EM drive and the Cannae drive is. This is just as simple.
And just for grins:
http://www.masinaelectrica.com/emdrive-independent-test/ <--- How to build your own world-famous EM electric space drive
OH YES! Don't forget to build the air-frame around the OTC-X1 engine. You need to build the hull around it. It needs a resonance cavity, just like the EM drive, or it won't fly.
Please send me some video of it at the email at the footer of this website!
The coil within the central accumulator has a space to wind an actuating coil, however this image above depicts the configuration (1), with two resonance coils, one on top, and one on bottom.
The central accumulator however is different in this image. It can be wound with a resonance coil, and use a bifilar flat coil inside as the primary actuating coil, conducting the high volt collapse of electromagnetic fields.
The collapse of the electromagnetic fields from the outer electromagnets occur over the utrons. Just as a reactionless power cell can create mass (see the home page intro), then the collapse of the electromagnetic field poles also is responsible for creating more output than input ultimately, as in the case of a Bedini overunity system (see the Free Energy / Tesla page), but does not create heavy mass due to its negative energy characteristics.
This then describes the collapse of a buildup of electromagnetic mass, carried through vortex generated by the utrons. In Tesla energy theory, the spark collapse does not conduct the direct mass of electrons, but conducts the raw energy field responsible for creating electron-mass, but with no power loss due to the transfer of electron-mass. That is why Tesla used induction motors, and induction generators, and induction coils, because there was no power loss due to Newtonian inertia of electron mass. This is explained in the introduction on the home page of this website referencing measuring the speed of light.
However as the electromagnets collapse over the utrons, there is no static field path for the collapse of the ENERGY to travel through (no electrostatic corridor over the inductive plates that acts as a wireless conductive energy corridor). But when the system reaches a fast motion, the energy field is instead conducted through the static active medium within the resonance cavity of the hull space, REQUIRING there to be a hull or airframe for it to work properly.
Inductive field collapse is the principle driver of Bedini overunity circuitry. This still has yet to be worked out in the OTC-X1, because instead of a coil, there is a monopole above and below the utron halves (whereas Bedini circuitry works on one side and the other side of a coil, driven by the coil's electromagnetic field polarity). The field collapse nonetheless carries negative energy to the central accumulator. The two halves of the central accumulator represent the run/power battery, and the charge battery, but in advanced circuitry provided by Matrix Le, both halves (both batteries) can be charged -- the run battery can also be charging as it is running, without getting hot.
The utrons hold negative energy resonance and capacitance and are field generators.
The magneto-electrostatic aspect is mono-polar, creating electrical vacuum on the outside, and drawing that vacuum to the center, accumulating high volt negative electron mass.
As the electromagnet field coils (c-shaped) turn the rotor, it draws across a magneto-static charged mono-pole of the utron/accumulator frame (disk), inducing motion, without displacing the magneto-static charged field on the charge plates. This creates additional motion of charge and accelerated pressure of voltage. A direct connection of electromagnetic current will displace the magneto-electrostatic charged plate surfaces. That is to be avoided.
It is possible a spark may jump to the utron from the c-shaped electromagnetics. If they are "resonance-wound" however (a single winding layer), then the whole system would have to be reversed with the negative charge in center, and the positive static charge the outside, and a separate external power source would have to be used to create a charged field around the outside, and I don't think that's the case, but it might be.
At one end of the longitudinal flat plane path there will be a negative static force that feels like electrical water, and at the other end, there will be a positive static force that feels like dangerous voltage, which is how scalar fields work, as per the Tesla tower Ley-line experiments I've done; also correlated by Viktor Shauberger who also noted the electrical waterfall sensation across the hull of the Haunebu II.
My Tesla system however tended to draw electrical force to the vacuum center under the tower, eventually neutralizing the system due to improper use of grounds (this was in the original test shown on the Tesla Engineering Physics page).
Note the integration of the vertical impeller above the central accumulator.
This is currently for testing purposes.
I'm still not exactly sure where to feed the power in to the test assembly, but at least having a test assembly is a whole lot easier at this point, than trying to figure out how the regenerative power system works -- that can come later, after we know which way it works.
Resonance coil winding:
Tossing out all notions of building in self-regenerating circuitry from the onset, and just using the initial test setup shown here, I wanted to note the resonance coil winding of the outer c-shaped electromagnets, wound with a single layer coil.
If doing so, the same polarity can be used and it simplifies things even further. By running straight negative energy into the coil, derived from the electromagnetic collapse, then we're cooking with gas.
However, and this is important, an induction coil cannot be used since a small part of that action is a buildup of an electromagnetic field, which is conducted through the wires, just the same as the "spark collapse" of a collapsing electromagnetic field is conducted through the wires. In a Bedini engine, only the negative electromagnetic collapse is harnessed on the re-charging cycle. An induction coil can still be used if the wires are positioned inside the output terminals but not directly touching the output terminals of an induction coil, so that the only energy conducted is from bridging the spark gap. This is a possibility, instead of a straight connection.
Regardless, in a resonance coil, pure magneto-static DC current can be run from a Bedini pulse motor to charge the coils and keep them charged throughout the c-shaped electromagnets' full range of motion.
A static-electromagnetic field will still cause the rotor to move, inducing motion. The addition of the collapsing energy waveform will give the electromagnetic field its special electrostatic characteristics, so the whole system can be operating on purely magneto-electrostatic energy.
So here is the test setup for use with the resonance (single layer) coil winding on the outer c-shaped electromagnets:
Run the spark collapse through the coils instead of straight (positive energy) DC polarity. This should be done without a secondary, or primary actuating coil winding, but just straight run through the system, from for example an external Tesla coil, and it should be run at high frequency. You have options here, though.
The flyback output from a Bedini system is your best bet as the energy type to run through the outer c-shaped electromagnets, due to the nature of the static force from a Tesla coil tending to polarize only at one end or the other, now that I'm thinking about it.
This should all be considered the basic architecture of the engine, making use of overunity negative energy gravitation.
In related Tesla theory, using the spark gap only for transmission of power through wires (without a direct wire connection) will tend to take electron mass out of the equation, eliminating resistance due to Newtonian physics. Again, see the home page introduction for clarity of this. If we can assume that in reactionless free energy and overunity systems that the electron mass is not how electricity is actually created (I know, I'm mentioning "creation of energy" here; again see the home page intro), then mass is not being created as more energy output over input is being generated. This allows for faster-than-light frequency characteristics, however, as per the characteristics and nature of longitudinal scalar waves, which are simultaneous in their energy transmission from point A to point B, as per Eric Dollard's measurements, and recorded observations, giving the OTC-X1 it's teleportation characteristics.
As such, as a frequency engine, time is accelerated, thereby the proportional decrease of mass is achieved in that relative relation (time decreases closer to gravitational mass, and increases away from gravitational mass).
Changing one's position relative to a gravitational mass will change the time frequency, as well as movement and speed (general and special relativity). But changing the time frequency also must change the nature of a gravitational mass, using that proportion in reverse, thereby incurring mass reduction.
Test setup 1, 2, 3, and 4, with optional power systems, 5 and 6.
Note: running power from the inductive electromagnetic spark collapse, using the spark gap not touching output terminals, may not put the static force only at one end of the coil since that only happens with a primary actuating coil and secondary resonance coil.
Running negative energy output just through the resonance coil will probably make it a uniform magnetostatic field which would be ideal and a lot more powerful than an electromagnetic field. This has to be tested tho.
So, connect the electromagnets with resonance winding to the spark gap of the induction coil output, not touching the output terminals, and it should be uniform field, in scalar resonance longitudinally with the central accumulator magnetostatic output. Simple testing.
home page introduction
Tribute to Bedini article on General Blog
The article just below this article
OTC-X1 Bedini Framework and MVP Pulse Motor on the Free Energy / Tesla page
Surprise Beginning - Overunity Gravitation on the Info page
Warp Drive News page
.. and the rest of the resources on this website.
One more test configuration:
Pretty straightforward. The goal is to achieve longitudinal scalar resonance, to raise the frequency through motion and counter-motion.
High volt source: pulsed MVP (from the collapse of the electromagnetic field only).
I think the capacitor plates should be charged, personally in the same manner, however the utrons had to serve some kind of purpose. It may very well be that they are connected into the high volt circuit, however, using their electrolyte, but that would definitely require an external power supply. And at that point, might as well throw the vertical impeller on as an overdrive, and use the Townsend Brown techniques with an extended hull.
BUT in this configuration it actually would make more sense to make the outside of the plates positive, and the inside toward the central accumulator negative, denoting the collection of the electric charge toward the center.
A brief note on electrets:
Hutchison and Bedini electret crystal power cells are made from like a cell phone charger or small DC adaptor you plug into your wall.
Electrets are the electrostatic equivalent of a permanent magnet. They don't lose their charge (nothing lasts for ever, so they can last for hundreds or thousands of years; it's like saying that the Earth has perpetuated its motion around the sun for billions of years, so does perpetual motion exist or not, and is the point moot?). Make em for real cheap. Electrets will make electric fields and electric current permanently. We knew about them in the 1700's.
Note the use of utron as electret, creating an electrostatic field. In the lower portions of this article, it is also explained how the utron, like the electret is a dielectric material, which resembles Townsend Brown technology.
These are the only configurations that I know of. I have thought about an overunity style self-regenerating circuitry where one half of the central accumulator is the power battery, and the lower half is the charge battery, but there is no way for a self-regenerating circuit path to work in these coil configurations.
A spark gap can be included into the central accumulator, but it ought to be a magnet in this case, but as far as capacitor plates, yeah maybe they can be squeezed in there somewhere ... and the central accumulator can be wound in coil, sure.
But the outer c-shaped electromagnets do not appear to be of the electromagnet variety. They appear to be resonance coils (superconductive scalar flat wave style), which is the only conceivable way this can work.
Mass reduction is the key here, INSTEAD of electrostatic lift.
The interior hull is air-tight, but the electrostatic lift is achieved through the impeller. The OTC-X1 engine is not designed for electrostatic lift, but ONLY mass reduction, which will get it to levitate and be so light that one's thoughts can move it, as per the concept goes, making a field that the pilot can ride in, as light.
I'll be honest here. Everything points to these configurations. After years and years and years of study, this is what I have learned. So at this point, unless a major breakthrough happens, there honestly is no need to continue updating this website. As it stands, the Outer Ring engine of the LAU-X4 is no longer required.
An external power supply will be required, and that is achieved through the MVP pulse motor (most volts possible), and it can use additional transformers to raise the volts, so the power source will take up most of the available space inside the ship, leaving about the same amount of room that the pilots for the OTC-X1 would have had, regardless.
If we can't figure out Otis's secret, then it's gonna have to be adapted, and then it might as well be upgraded. I don't want to spend 20 years trying to figure out techniques and ways that are just no longer around, and have been completely lost due to the shutting down of OTC Enterprises.
Note: I noted a transformer block to conduct the magnetic flux between the resonance coils. The coils can be connected however. Usually electricity takes the shortest path, but with electrostatics, electricity takes the widest path through the whole system. From just one ground rod on my Tesla tower, the whole dang system got charged from top to bottom and out the sides, using just a single wire connecting from here or there is enough to "coax" the fields to go toward each assembly or resonating transformer. So ... it's not hard, it's just costly to do experimenting.
Also, the hull of the craft will conduct magneto-electrostatic fields around pretty well, a lot like a transformer block conducting magnetic fields.
Here is the final variation. Self explanatory. The central accumulator mass is arranged in magnetic and dielectric plates, which conforms to the standard set by the tests in a vacuum pertaining to this style, with the achieving of lift in a vacuum according to the pdf on the Construction page in the Townsend Brown section.
For those without Tesla coil experience, it may be hard to understand that by using a DC induction coil, there is a definite static charge either on top of the coil or on the bottom depending on polarity, but that is the style of all these electrostatic and electrogravitic architectures.
This uses Eric Dollard's discovery of simultaneous transmission / teleportation of energy from A to B along a flat wave (longitudinal) which is outlined in the Free Energy / Tesla section regarding my work with the Tesla tower Ley-line system. I have measured these things as well, but was unable to track a speed value; however the concept I am trying to duplicate in a portable motor system is the setup of a longitudinal wave base similar to the Earth's surface, where energy can be transmitted and teleported along a flat wave (longitudinal scalar).
If we consider an overunity system is capable of creating more energy output than input, then it can be said that electricity is created, electrons, and therefore mass is produced, and in such a field of produced and generated mass, a gravity field wake behind such direction of mass, accumulated at the center, would result in negative gravitation.
The drive shaft is coiled, with induction primaries of high volt flyback (did not note the high volt power source in the diagram). All of the high volt sources should be due to flyback voltage only, derived from the electromagnetic collapse, which is the only way known in the public to achieve overunity energy output, and is considered to be the principle aspect to derive negative energy, in several ways, however negative energy is a little more complex, but nonetheless that is the foundation as we know it, which has actually achieved results congruently throughout all these experiments mainly those done by Eric Dollard, and duplicated on the video in the intro on the home page showing the clocking of electrical energy, which may or may not be considered electron mass, at speeds greater than the speed of light.
Also regarding the Outer Ring, if an inductive transformer is to be used, it must match the rotation of the OTC-X1 engine, or be in a resonance harmonic of it (I didn't think this was important to mention since it should be obvious, but I thought I would). However again, at this point, the Outer Ring is optional but is still under research unfortunately because the MEG it seems is not reliable or viable, due to the removal of the principle core material off the market, and is no longer available.
So this is our solution.
If this doesn't work, then the government will have to be petitioned to release the 5,000 patents regarding all of this technology. As per the Constitution of the United States:
There is a provision in the Constitution of the United States that suppressed patents MUST be released after a certain time, and I quote: "Suppression of free energy [and antigravity] technologies violates Article 1, sec. 8 clause  of the U.S. Constitution which mandates the progress of science by disclosure of discoveries of a limited term"
Negative Mass Energy Field:
The solution to this: If induction and flyback creates more energy output than input, regarding the creation of new electron-mass: then due to the elimination of resistance due to the Lenz law of an opposing force that must exist to oppose movement of mass, whereas such law has been nearly overcome, to achieve a high output of overunity (see Intro home page, see Free Energy / Tesla page regarding the MVP pulse motor), then ....
We're looking at negative mass which is what results in overcoming a force that prevents mass from traveling faster than light. In fact, we're looking at negative electron mass created in an energy field, accumulated in the center of the OTC-X1. The home page intro updated content shows these relations, and experimental results showing that electrical energy can indeed move faster than light.
Overcoming the force that opposes electromagnetic motion has lead to overunity, and resultingly an application of the creation of electron mass but, in a negative energy characteristic. It has to be understood through electron mass however, even though Tesla created the spark gap originally to overcome the force of resistance of electron mass, and thereby using electrical induction to drive his energy experiments. Tesla was no stranger to the useage of the collapse of electromagnetic fields to achieve overunity and high output.
According to the pdf on the Construction page in the Townsend Brown section, experiments were performed with a narrow magnet on top, dielectric material in the middle, and wider magnet on bottom, and that structure demonstrated lift in a vacuum. That resembles the utron shape and the central accumulator shape, which when drawn to tips may have a significant repulsion field effect.
Here is the pdf file: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02576.pdf
Positive gravity attracts due to positive mass. Negative gravity repels due to negative mass.
How is the lift being generated? What force is there involved? It is conventionally thought to be an electrogravitational force, since vacuum is involved.
Is it due to the inertial polarization in the system, or what?
At this point we can only look at the geometry of the system to draw conclusions. However both the central accumulator and the utrons will exhibit this behavior, if constructed with dielectric and magnetic layers, according to published results shown in the pdf. So then the utrons are generating a negative mass force, along with the central accumulator. Couple this with the superconductive field of longitudinal resonance, and now we're drawing that energy out into a field effect, and amplifying the force within the Central Accumulator.
I may have the polarities incorrect, but I'm assuming it to be a positive magnetostatic charge, I should have written those polarities down when I did the original experiments on the receiving pedestal (console) with my induction coil, but regardless of positive or negative charge, the effect is a static force, which very well could be a negative charge -- a buildup of electron negative mass. That's what the effect is attributed to regardless, but again, now that I know much more about all this, then eventually those can be measured and written down.. But that is just an aside.
At this point however, there is enough to show beyond a reasonable shadow of a doubt that this technology will work, and warp drive is real, and is able to be built, again, based on the mainstay of physics used at this website, which honestly derived the solution long ago, but lacked sufficient development to put it into a solid framework until now. It took a LONG time to work all this stuff out, researching every day, only to get out of the Otis T. Carr box about all this mess and see things as how we can do them nowadays.
I don't want to get too heavy in this portion of repulsor theory because it can get out of hand real quick looking at the polarities and dualities rather than the unified results. Suffice to say, it's time for a celebration.
Dielectric Central Accumulator:
After doing some research about Townsend Brown and whatnot, I think it would be pretty easy to make a central accumulator with layered magnets sandwiched between the Bedini crystal power cell material, which is a dielectric material. The videos on the Free Energy / Tesla page show how to make the electret materials.
Should be easy to do in a nice thin-walled nanocrystalline (or ceramic or neodymium) cone container, in two halves and put them together. Just drop a magnet piece in, pour some liquid electret material, drop another magnet piece in (they will stick together; make them to fit the conical frame), etc. Charge and hold until they solidify.
This is similar to the "lattice work" that Carr mentioned in constructing his central accumulator.
Utrons are a little different, because they don't use magnetic layers or they'll stick to the c-shaped resonance coil blocks. The c-shaped resonance coil frame (that the coils are wound around; the half-block) transfer the magneto-static impulses to the utrons as they pass by. If we consider the utrons to be charged, then the c-shaped resonance electromagnets can move the utrons just like how they act on the plates.
I'm unsure of a regenerative circuit approach here. It's possible the utrons can charge the resonance coils (electromagnets), but since they must act upon the coils, and since the coils act as resonance coils (instead of electromagnets which I don't see it doing anything for any kind of static propulsion), a resonance coil approach in propulsion is not the same approach to a regenerative circuit as a Bedini coil.
There truly is a reason why I am considering electret material as the dielectric. To make energy, two parts have to work together, each with energy of their own. If one part has zero energy, and the other part has an energy of, say "1" then there would be a net energy of zero, as energy by its nature multiplies on 2 parts as a whole.
So with an active medium creating an electrostatic field, as per the definition of the "electret," then we've got something here. A hollow utron can also be of the same. So as long as it creates an electrostatic field, then the "medium is active," as Tesla described the nature of zero point and radiant energy fields and negative energy fields upon the charge of Earth surface, and explained by Tom Bearden.
With an active medium, then longitudinal wave transmission in a portable system is all-the-more applicable, and able to be stressed, pushed on, pulled on, taking the whole of the mass along with it, instead of as electricity usually does, which only acts upon the surface of material (which is why a Faraday cage works so well).
In fact, filling the utrons with an electret material would make use of the whole of the mass, as the principle of the Biefeld-Brown effect. Using resonance coil magneto-electrostatic frequencies, can act upon the whole of the mass, inducing the mass to be polarized in a lifting field, or in a mass-reduction gravity-cancellation field.
The Central Accumulator housing using a magnetic outside wall (housing) can help to conduct to the dielectrostatic active medium field generated by the dielectric electret material within. There are ways to do this where the dielectrostatic field will conduct to the outer housing however. I have a picture of a concept in an article below, which may use a thin hollow copper rod or something.
The goal of the utron is to do the same, but not to use a magnetic material in it, but to use the type shown above where the equatorial region is insulated, so that each half can be charged in polarity.
Cool, huh? Should be easy to do! The negative magneto-electrostatic energy in high volt flyback going through the resonance coils should easily vibrate the entirety of the dielectric electret mass for a true Biefeld-Brown effect!
The resonance coil energy interacts with the dielectrostatic field of the electret/dielectric material. Get it? It interacts with the whole of the mass! Massive K potential.
Bifilar dielectric "capacitor" plates:
I had thought of using a bifilar coil winding for the "capacitor plates" so as to better conduct a longitudinal di-electric waveform, as well. It is possible to use a type of antenna grid however, in a frame, like a series of bare-metal wires with a little bit of space in between, to harness the dielectric waveform as parallel waves. They would be bound by metal to define its shape so that electric current flows along the sides, but also charges each wire and is conducted in that manner. This is a possibility, or perhaps even as a grid shape, but with spaces for a dielectric wave form similar to as mentioned, an "antenna grid."
This is a possibility, to better direct electrical flow to the center of the central accumulator. It can be simple construction, built on a load-bearing disk frame.
Using high volts, in an air-tight frame, there may be some kind of mass reduction electrogravity effect.
Reading Carr's Dimensions of Mystery and the rest of it may be shed more insights, along with Tom Bearden's material as well, but this is at least food for thought to an otherwise simple construct that may depend upon unusual material that we just may not have access to, like the materials from "Art's Parts" from the Roswell crash, using an aluminum and a little percentage of bismuth (bismuth becomes superconductive when it gets very, very, very thin). Graphite also has di-magnetic properties.
The material levitated when an electrostatic field was applied to it. When considering that the electrostatic field would be applied to the inside, then would it levitate or not?
In any electrogravity setup, high volts are required, for example in the 1400 volt electrostatic satellite engine I detected beaming my Tesla tower. That's 1.4 KV. A pulsed collapse of electromagnetic fields creates the magneto-electrostatic energy; and in a bifilar coil, a static magnet is produced instead of an electromagnetic field in motion due to standing waves in the dielectric field created by the flat coil shape. Once again, what I mean by magneto-static, is magneto-electrostatic, creating an electrostatic field with magnetic polarity.
Longitudinal wave resonance is created by this energy, by the magneto-electrostatic energies. ... and ... there have been no tests of the usage of the electromagnetic collapse (for example in overunity devices such as the MVP motor), to generate a Biefeld-Brown effect; the only tests have been the usage of "positive energy" high volts, not "negative energy" high volts.
I do apologize, but I have been taught, and I have seen examples and certain papers that are no longer around explaining negative energy to have its basis in the collapse of electromagnetic density -- the collapse of the positive volume of energy. Using resonance coils instead of electromagnets therefore, can make use of longitudinal resonance with a negative "collapse" of the volume of electromagnetic fields, in a resonating frequency.
Also as a note:
......... Negative energy will conduct electromagnetic current wirelessly, transforming its waveform to a longitudinal wave, when using one-pole monopolar arrangements .. this is a bit complex, one of the keys to doing this is to send one pole of a battery along a wire, and the other pole along the surface of the Earth, using a Tesla tower Ley-line type of setup as I have shown here on my website on the Tesla Engineering Physics page, with the tower and receiving pedestal, although I did this experiment using the receiving pedestal (console) as the transmitter.
I was able to conduct the entirety of the current from a AA battery (the whole Tesla system was powered naturally and radiantly using just the charge of the Earth's surface), by adjusting a secondary coil's height over the ground.
Negative energy is NOT derived from a battery. Such a standard electromagnetic current from a battery has no penetration power, or excitation power, and is not a universal power source. For example, high volt flyback from a collapsing electromagnetic field, even at 400 volts will charge a battery at 12 volts, and run motors and run electric battery chargers, no matter the high volts because as such, NEGATIVE ENERGY IS A UNIVERSAL POWER SUPPLY, DERIVED FROM THE COLLAPSE OF THE ELECTOMAGNETIC FIELD. Kinda like how a stun gun works or whatever.. but this has been determined.
As stated on the home page:
"Tesla didn't say that Earth is a vast reservoir of negative charge .. he said the Earth is a vast reservoir of negative electricity. The Earth's surface charge is a positive charge. Tesla was smart enough to realize this, that the negative pole of a battery grounded and formed a circuit to the positive charge of the Earth surface (ground). .... What he CLAIMED is that Earth is a vast reservoir of negative energy. Negative electricity is MUCH DIFFERENT than the negative electrical charge! ...... The Earth surface charge is a scalar / longitudinal flat wave as the collapsed waveform of electromagnetism from the Earth's magnetic field, which is what negative energy is, and what the Alcubierre warp drive metrics call for in the White-Alcubierre model."
Biefeld-Brown now may be doable by using electret material as the dielectrostatic active medium, giving the whole of the mass of the ability to be polarized in electro inertial potential.
Magneto-electrostatic resonance is the key, which resonates longitudinally with the magnetic field of the Central Accumulator, but now the Central Accumulator is able to hold a magneto-electrostatic field charge of it's own, and so the full unified resonance and inertial polarization of matter is now able to be achieved in theory.
Also the nature of the collapse of electron mass to generate a negative-mass or mass-reduction therefore gravity cancellation field is applied in conjunction with longitudinal scalar resonance, whereas a longitudinal "flat" wave will transmit energy from point A to B at simultaneous speeds, giving the OTC-X1 its teleportation characteristics, and forcing electron mass into negative mass characteristics, inducing the excitation of the proton mass of the materials of the craft along with it.
It's complex but this is what we are now working with.
The Scalar plane of a flat longitudinal wave
The Earth's surface is a flat wave, a longitudinal wave, and is the best example of what a scalar longitudinal wave is, does, and looks like.
Let me describe a longitudinal wave versus an electromagnetic wave.
Stretch a rope from person A to person B. Person A give it a shake, and it sends a ripple to person B, taking time to travel (electromagnetic wave). Stretch the rope tight, and person A gives it a tug, and person B feels it INSTANTANEOUSLY (longitudinal flat wave), taking no time to travel a distance.
This is exactly what Eric Dollard has measured sending AM radio waves over the surface of the Earth, in a special configuration where the wave arrived to the distant destination the very same moment it left, taking no time to travel. He has experimental validation of this, and this is what gives the OTC-X1 its teleportation characteristics.
The Earth's surface is a weak positive charge, but it is static, and when you get it to move around a bit, then it becomes electromagnetic, but otherwise it is electrostatic in nature, without any kind of magnetic wave aspect to it.
The "capacitor plates" in the OTC-X1 resemble a flat surface, and can be made to be charged with an electrostatic field from an electret material underneath the surface of the plate.
Picture standing on a flat electret with a weak positive charge. There will have to be an opposite charge underneath somewhere, though.
How longitudinal scalar negative energy works, is to just use a monopole of a charge. In my Tesla tower experiments, I connected one end of a battery to one spark gap on the receiving console (which was being used as the transmitter, actually, so the transmitting console), and the other end of the battery to the other spark gap. One spark gap ran via wire in the air out to the tower, while the other one ran to local ground outside my house. Two distant points on the ground were tapped.
It would stand to reason I connected the positive end of the battery to the spark gap (a hollow copper sphere) that ran to the tower, since the positive end could not ground to the Earth surface, only the negative end. I really don't know which end went where to be honest, it could have been the other way; sometimes this equipment works in mysterious ways. I used an anologue volt meter set to the "ohms" setting so that the meter electrodes were the output terminals instead of the input terminals. That's how those simple little meters work, and it allowed me to check to see how much of the battery's current went where, and how to adjust the current flow using that secondary coil I mentioned above.
Running one pole along ground, running one pole in air, was a semi-wireless way of transmitting power through a form of negative energy, in that it wasn't transmitting power in the form of an electromagnetic wave (an electromagnetic current requires two poles). It transmitted power in the form of a longitudinal wave, instead. This is the best way I can explain it, how I was taught by my mentor.
So now, picture the flat plates of the OTC-X1 rotor - the utron/accumulator disk.
The energy being used is electromagnetic-static, in that form because the spark collapse is deriving it. When the spark from the collapse is run on a wire, in a coil, then it creates a massive static field.
So, the capacitor plates would have to be charged with a flat electret for this to work, for there to be an active dielectrostatic medium (like the surface of the Earth) for current to travel as a longitudinal wave, thereby a wave that travels faster than light, not limited to the speed limit of the electromagnetic wave.
As a one-pole wave, energy is in resonance with the longitudinal flat electrostatic negative energy of the Earth surface. But it can't be just a one-pole current from a battery, but from the monopole impulse fast-collapse of the electromagnetic field -- monopolar in that only one pole is put to work at a time.
In between the spark between the spark gaps, you can harness energy from a metal rod if you get the electrical arc to touch the metal rod, then you can measure a bizarre current at the other end, but you can hold it in your hand like how Tesla used to do, because the main energy is transferring between the gaps. I've seen people do this before, but not from between the gaps. Actually, it was at one end of a Tesla coil, where the hollow metal static conductor was at, that blasts out the electrical "lightning." That is MOST DEFINITELY a monopolar charge of electrostatic energy, and is best suited to run along the active medium of the Surface of our longitudinal flat plane, called the "active vacuum" by Tom Bearden.
So where we've got one pole in the center of the Central Accumulator, there must be the opposite pole at the other end of the flat plane, for an electromagnetic (magneto-electrostatic) current to flow, in monopolar form of a scalar longitudinal wave.
This is where real power amplification occurs.
This is basically the thing that I am testing currently in my Tesla-tower Ley-line experiments, to see how this works exactly, because we sorta have to know it to get the OTC-X1 to work right.
The only question is, how is the polarity aligned in the electret material between the flat capacitor plates of the OTC-X1 rotor disk?
Is the positive and negative charges aligned sideways to have constantly charged plates that will automatically be induced into motion from the outer resonance coils becoming active??
Let's say for the sake of argument that the positive pole is up, and the negative pole is down, and current is drawn from negative pole on the outside to the positive pole on the inside, or vice-versa.. I'm bad with polarities because of the way I initially learned all this stuff using non-polarized electrostatics.
Let's just say though, for the sake of argument it's in this way as a temporary test of logic, to examine it. It seems that everything has dielectric electrets in it, regarding the OTC-X1 except for the resonance coils! It's all active vacuum-based negative-energy technology.
So then if the Utrons are the "batteries" as Carr said, then they have polarity, and one end would connect to a capacitor plate, so that charge from the central accumulator would run to the utron. This would seem to be in opposition to a concept of the collapse of electron mass, and instead be working toward a concept of frequency and time to ADJUST the mass of the craft to a negative value by increasing the frequency of time . . .
This is our hinge-pin point.
It's also entirely possible that the utron is not connected to ANYTHING, and that the capacitor plates are self-charged.
The thing is though, even though the Earth surface charge is a positive charge, two dissimilar metal pipes can be placed at a distance from each other and one will be negative electromagnetic, and the other will be positive electromagnet, and a current will flow between them, and if you have enough of them, you'll feel a static charge flowing between them, when they are stuck into the Earth.
Nothing is stuck into our capacitor plates but we do have a force moving over them in terms of a resonance coil, and a metal frame (just like the Tesla tower floats over the surface of the Earth, and can be charged, and the charge felt and measured on a voltmeter without even having a ground rod plugged in; but having a ground rod direct connection, really makes it sing).
I had to add this in just because it may be important later on. But as of now, this may be relevant to the whole faster-than-light waveform time frequency thing, and it's worth a mention to say the least.
I'll know more eventually if it's important or not, after Tesla tower Ley-line tests.
Regardless, it can be considered to use an electret material sandwiched between the capacitor plates ... and as far as we know currently, the most probable alignment of charge is negative on the outside perimeter of the plates, and positive toward the inside near the Central Accumulator, like in the wiring diagrams above, and in the video "Wiring the OTC-X1."
Positive toward the Central Accumulator, and Negative to the outside. ... or negative in and pos out.. whatever.
Pouring the electret material out into forms for segments would raise the overall volts and amps, in an internal lattice (connected in series to raise volts, and parallel to raise amps), so the plates would be self-charged in the way that induces motion from the outer c-shaped resonance coils.
Raising volts is the best way to be in harmony with the type of current being used.
It's possible however that the internal alignment of the di-ELETRET active material would be a longitudinal di-electrostatic alignment in this arrangement, due to the nature of electric waves travelling in parallel, versus the nature of magnetic waves travelling in transverse! And now then we've got something else to go on here ...
So we are looking at a type of parallel / longitudinal wave, merely because it's electrostatic, rather than magnetic!
In Fact, through static resonance of the outer c-shaped resonance coils with the longitudinal plates being electrostatically active, then that charge can be conducted to the Central Accumulator wirelessly and in electromagnetic resonance, which will resemble a scalar and longitudinal resonance regardless, because the resonance coil poles are separated and isolated over the top and bottom of the capacitor disk!
The goal is to transmit one pole of one resonance coil to one "hemisphere" of the Central Accumulator, and the other pole to the other hemisphere, in magneto-electrostatic resonance.
This seems to be automatic, however. But .. I thought it would be worth a mention to better explain what scalar resonance is.
Coils in fact can be substituted for stout copper rods (again, for the sake of knowledge, but not really appropriate for use in the OTC-X1), which is a famous Tesla demonstration where the long stout and solid copper rods created a longitudinal wave resonance across the room to light a light bulb. Longitudinal scalar waves are created from long mass, and beamed side-ways rather than out the ends.
There was a demonstration once, and it can be found on youtube (Tesla's hairpin circuit) which lit up a lightbulb when it was under water, in a bowl, using these types of longitudinal scalar wave resonance dynamics.
So this is essentially what we're dealing with in a Tesla coil, a resonance-type coil, is that energy is transmitted sideways, off the sides of the coil, as well as running up and down the coil, and running away from the coil, using magneto-electrostatics in these ways.
A commenter mentioned that he wanted to see a test of the OTC-X1 spinning one full rotation. I showed him a video, but then saw that it was spun by hand, and I wonder if the OTC-X1 can do what it's claimed to do under DC power.
I've seen so many videos that I have learned to catch suspicious action.
Rotating Alternating Charges is key to true electrogravity, I think. That can make use of flyback from an outside peripheral of electromagnets. Snap reversals we hear about in UFOlogy, where an electromagnet is quickly reversed with an applied current, and then reversed again as it collapses with an opposite applied current, and reversed again, alternating ... and the energy builds up and up as it speeds up faster.
Whereas the above would make a good test in DC mode, I think alternating electrostatic field with a counter-rotational alternation of electromagnetic fields makes a LOT MORE SENSE.
Considering everything we've learned, that the electromagnetic field can act in resonance with the Central Accumulator, then we can have overlapping electrostatic and magnetostatic fields in 100% resonance with the entire rotational system.
Tesla did talk about this and write about this, using such a thing on hull plating.
The plates are a little narrower than the wider space between them. As they move off of one electromagnet, they move onto another, the plate charge reverses, and the electromagnets snap-reverse, sending high volt impulse induction into the plate.
Gonna have to work this out.
The role of the utrons in this, would be to shatter that electromagnetic field and disperse it in vortex where it can resonate easier with the Central Accumulator and the interior resonance cavity formed by the hull. At high enough frequency it would act like the EM drive.
It adds another dimension of motion and direction and can be a resonance cavity of it's own kind, like ringing a bell with a directed sound beam in polarity.
The OTC-X1 is an AC engine. No doubt about it. I otherwise know NOTHING about an utron other than it's the hammer, or mallet that strikes the magnetic field resonance and makes the system ring. The utron is electrostatic. Get it to move, as an electrostatic through alternating magnetic fields, then it can become an inductive "Tesla style hollow conductor thing" like the toroid top load on a Tesla coil. There happens to be a nearby coil (electromagnet).
Carr called it a battery so there may have been a need to route the power toward the edge of the flywheel using a utron accumulator. As a dielectric-electret, it would be useful, and I suppose there needs to be separation between the plates to prevent electrical arcing and shorting out of the plates. So why not?
Wire it the same as a plate, in alternating rotation, and get it to switch like a magnetic field. This is an option but not really for this website I don't think.
This is something that's going to have to go into a separate research and development phase.
According to Faraday's Law, direction of current to direction of an applied electromagnetic field creates a direction of motion. So the flywheel actually rotating is not really an issue here. The utron would just have to follow Faraday's law, and due to its shape, the plates would not arc and short out. It's probably just as simple as that, and nothing really all that special, I don't know.
If the OTC-X1 were a DC engine, then it could just spin on one solid disk, spinning a di-electric, in an applied electromagnetic field, or with resonance coils, but it wouldn't have the efficiency or the power behind it.. Searl's engine was claimed to have a stamped on spiral of north/south magnetized areas, which would also make Searl's SEG an AC style engine, and not a DC.
Maybe these are two different types of engines, but a DC OTC-X1 style would not need plate separations to achieve in theory to a negative gravitation.
AC current is an aspect of negative energy, as Tesla used in his day. However these are two different styles. I don't know if one will work over the other, maybe better than the other.
There's honestly nothing more to say at this point other than to get to building. I hope this has presented enough information to be believable, and to assist others in development.
There is one last thing ... I keep raving on and on about the MVP overunity pulse motor that works as a universal power supply no matter how many volts, using negative energy. It so happens to be in AC configuration. . . . . .
Happy Building to us all!