This is interesting. I've always liked David Wilcock. It is being reported widely that our exo-planets' environments are changing in many ways, from other sources INCLUDING from NASA. But NASA SPECIFICALLY (I am not excluding the ESO) is saying it's not caused by the sun, all these changes going on with our planets including Earth. Earth ocean floors are warming and we see an increase in volcanic and tectonic activity as well as increase in Schumann resonance .... which very much relates to the electrical nature of the universe which includes electromagnetic changes in the sun, too.
It's being widely reported that there is interplanetary climate change going on internally (as opposed to externally) with just about all the planets (notable moons too) in our Solar system. But NASA says it's not interplanetary warming; and NASA says it's not caused by the sun. .... our planets are doing this all on their own.
This is from the ministry of science in Egypt -->
This explains the electrical affects upon climate change VERY WELL -->
lso you have an argument going on about Pluto. On one hand Pluto is heating. On the other hand, debunkers have claimed Pluto is not heating up. However MIT says otherwise along with many others:
I'm not touching the tilt angles of planets to explain why they are either getting brighter or heating or getting brighter in the infrared spectrum only because Earth doesn't get warmer on the whole just because the sun shines on a different part of the planet. ...... Also it has been measured that X-waves I think their called - tidal galactic electrical frequencies have been measured from the galactic center to be entering our Solar system and affecting the sun.
Near as I can tell, there are credible sources saying both yay AND nay regarding interplanetary climate change but it is 100% established that many of our planets are indeed going thru internal changes.
Personally, I don't think NASA is taking into consideration the electrical effects of frequency and resonance. Not gravitational resonance but ELECTRICAL. Gravity is the least of my concerns since gravity is closely linked to electromagnetism regardless as our sciences are now turning toward in the mainstream.
If you take into consideration that Pluto is at the farthest edge of our Solar capacitor, not shielded as much as the rest of the planets (Neptune also at the edge sometimes farther than Pluto), then these interplanetary ENVIRONMENT changes can be explained easily thru galactic tidal forces which we have been measuring since the 1990's and growing in intensity.
Any orbital changes to the planets will also affect the electrical Solar capacitor and IMMEDIATELY affect the sun's magnetic field.
Comets affect the sun's magnetic field in HUGE ways. So a brown dwarf or massive body entering the Solar system on that scale would start causing catastrophic climate impact on Earth early on. I don't see that we're at that point yet. Schumann frequency increase on Earth is the most obvious effect of climate change being due to the electrical nature of Earth resonance with our solar capacitor (cosmic electrodynamics) but .. you're getting into stuff the public generally has no clue about at that level .. and going beyond that level dealing with weather modification technologies is well beyond the scope of many of these articles and sources' ability to put forth any real case of climate change since SO MUCH is either not being admitted, actively denied, not considered, or just blatantly disregarded.
It's been talked about since around 2002 the possibilities of our star sharing a binary brown dwarf twin .. after Zechariah Sitchin published all that info from the Summerian Hall of Records translations, and I'm not discounting the possibilities of Astral planets (although that is highly unlikely, but I'm mentioning it since others have mentioned it to me) since huge amounts of electrical energy can be traded back and forth between those systems as I have also learned some in part of my experiments and experiences (very traumatic experience there).
Those two issues tho don't correspond with what we have been told and witnessed and put to the test and verified regarding the frequency increase from the Galactic core ... which we have been preparing for to handle that since the 1990's if not earlier.
We've known THAT was coming. So sudden "revelations" about astral planets doesn't apply as the cause ... and we know gravitational shifts aren't to blame either ...
Since climate change is political and involves money and power and control, it is highly suspect to me that ONCE AGAIN we're not being told the truth.