Don't have anything about the double slit experiment, so I thought I'd add something on it.
Person A: "thats how I approached the topic of nonlocal consciousness, we do it all the time even though we might be unaware, when you study a subject like math, you have two cognitive processes going on, you turn your thoughts inward and go into nonlocal consciousness (the wave state), if you don't grasp the material its because you didn't transfer that information into the particle state"
Person B: "hmm.. the wave state is also a particle state.. but, it's just a matter of point of view essentially.. I understand your meaning, though."
A): "thats another thing Lommel brought up, its like you have all these thoughts going on in the elecromagnetic field and the way you bring those thoughts into the particle state is by focusing your attention on them long enough"
B): "well.. that line of reasoning is highly metaphorical. For example, what does he mean by the wave state, and the particle state? It is well known the nature of all matter to be both waves and particles. It's hard to separate the same thing into different things. A single electron is both a wave and a particle simultaneously..
A "wave state" and "particle state" is not really physics at all.. it's a metaphor that determines the "measurement state." ... A particle can imply a point of focus within a field, but it's not an absolute among all people. For example, I can stick my head in an electromagnetic field and perceive a whole bunch of thoughts without having to focus on them. I have to focus to NOT perceive them all at once, depending on the type of field it is. It's like testing out a stun gun, but to the brain instead. LOL ..." [Just to clarify, it's a little known science or methodology to electrically induce a disruption to the mind of a Human being, using technology. The Montauk project dealt with mind control and brainwave disruption / counter-programming, etc]
A): "if I remember I believe he connected it to the double slit experiment where the particle/wave duality depended on the consciousness of the observer"
B): "um.. no. yes, but no. It's a paradox, not a duality. It depends upon how a measurement is made. not necessarily upon the consciousness of the observer. You cannot separate the two states."
A): "people must be using the wrong terms then to explain something thats legit. I've also heard it called "particle/wave coexistence", that could be more appropriate"
B): "But chemistry typically deals with an objective electron (particle) study, versus say.. wave interferometry which deals mainly with the wave action of particles.. it's not to say that the particles make waves, it's to say that the waves themselves, as well as particles, are not really objects at all."
B): "The double slit experiments shows that particles and waves are the same state. If you are looking for a particle, you'll find it. If you are looking for a wave you'll find it. That's the only difference, in regard to how a measurement is made.. not in the reality of matter itself.
The double slit experiment further shows that an electron can literally be in two places at once, as a particle. That is also the principle behind a stereo radio. It's a concept called "quantum tunelling." Doesn't really have anything to do with "tunnels" though ..."
A): "doesn't it also show that no matter how the electrons are fired at the screen they still form a pattern?"
B): "Yeah, a wave interference pattern."
A): "I just had a thought - what you said about the double slit experiment proving an electron to be in two places at once as a particle could explain ghosts, OBE's, bi-location - people being seen in two places simultaneously"
B): "bi-location, super-positioning. Stereo radio, teleportation, yep. By now, the double slit experiment is so well known.. and all the philosophical aspects about it have been thought about. Quantum tunneling is the phenomena that the electron can be in two places at once. That's also in part a definition of exotic matter
A): "also, some people cannot see the connection between the double slit experiment and NDE's, OBE's or how consciousness is non-local. The double slit experiment as proof is the analogy in that how consciousness functions is just like how the electrons behave in the double slit experiment."
B): "First they would have to see the relation between consciousness and matter, as reality itself."
A): "yeah, from there, it ties into reincarnation, someone in a book or article I read said "if it can be proven that consciousness flees the physical body when we experience death, is it possible for consciousness to enter an unborn fetus?"
B): "yeah well.. the body is also consciousness."
A): "yeah, the NDE accounts of people say that when they shed the physical body they found themselves hovering above their lifeless physical body."
B): "What is it that actually leaves the body .. hmm.. well.. some call it the soul, some the spirit, some the awareness, some the consciousness. what is it? What are we? We are obviously not our bodies, but can it really be claimed that the body holds our spiritual essence, while we in fact co-create our bodies?
You can travel out of your body for sure. Lots of things to consider. We are entangled with our bodies.. Silver cord ... I prefer to think of the Kundalini itself which is more or less who we are, as the "point of reference" of a soul experiencing physical life in a body. That's also from experience and a need to understand .. for my mind to "put my finger" on what cannot be physically touched .. so to speak.
Obviously who we are also surrounds us, and we can resonate. Resonance itself is being in multiple places at once. Certainly there is that reflection, otherwise there would be no resonance. Like the electron being two places at once, and in harmonic wave-vibration with other electrons.
Sometimes they can act as one large macro electron.. that's rarely seen, in some experiments that are not publicly known, but nonetheless how the micro also behaves as macro .. some may not believe, but it's fairly obvious if you think about it. Particle physics is the micro breakdown of what we observe in macro reality. Getting a bunch of electrons to vibrate and behave as one electron is music, vibration, sound, light .. fairly common sense. Harmonic resonance. That's more of an exotic state of matter though.
A): "In the consciousness beyond life book, Pim Von Lommel mentions that when we communicate effectively and resonating with another we are accessing information non-locally"
B): "I'll agree with that. There have been experiments where some people with a certain magnetic property in their brain, can match the brainwaves of someone nearby, and access personal memories of the other person. Some experiments have shown that also, non-locally being separated by thousands of miles. I participated in such an experiment, although it was very intrusive and uncomfortable to me. It took a Tesla tower to achieve it, though."
A): "I believe that was mentioned in some book I read. Something about how when we're in tune with our emotions and energetic field we can access someone else's akashic record"
B): "Yes. It's nothing that violates privacy, either. It is pure perception and knowing. If you can't gain a feel about who you're talking with for example, then how can you discern? It's not necessarily a perception of "peering inside another," but more of an introspective thing of its own right. Thus, no violation of privacy. The only fear there is judgment, and is one's perception accurate, or distorted by one's own waves of emotions and thoughts. That's why, as you say, being in tune with one's own emotions and energetic field, and being centered and non-biased with detachment doesn't so much remove a risk of judgment, but allows for a clear perception.
Although no perception of another is going to be 100% accurate. There will ALWAYS be variations. That was put to the test for me in that experiment I mentioned. Someone knew an awful lot about my private thoughts and experiences; but, they had a margin of error when they related it back to me, particular concerning one important detail involving a description of a dream character of "mine." Yes, that was the depth of the intimacy involved.
What's worse is that remote influencing is also something to guard against if it's not wholesome and loving and positive!
Remove viewing is also another practice that shows just how non-local consciousness really is.
Major Ed Dames was involved in creating a CIA remote viewing program and system that could be taught to others and duplicated experimentally. His groups remote viewed 2034 being a time when a solar flare would destroy Earth; AND, they could not remote view beyond that point into the future.
Since there is always going to be distortion that can actually be factored in, after all it must be accounted for, then it could be a symbolic representation of something ENTIRELY different!
Mostly however, remote viewing as a practice is very, VERY accurate.