It's pretty hard to explain this because people think of ionic charge when thinking of "magneto-static," but that isn't the type of energy that drives inertia in a vacuum. I think I've managed to isolate it as a form of "negative energy plasma," and match a physical sensation to it, also to describe it.
Points of Interest:
1) It has to be seen as a moving force in a vacuum, and the only things to do that are using scalar electrical energies (longitudinal and parallel); but the EM drive is surely using a type of radio frequency in the microwave band in an enclosed copper resonance cavity.
That is similar to David Sereda's concepts, a little bit.
2) The Cannae space drive uses a capacitor plate stack, and uses an electrostatic scanning beam for propulsion. (electrical inertia with no trade in mass)
3) Townsend Brown tech in a vacuum worked obviously because he is known for that, that no one has managed to duplicate, yet, at least in public.
4) Negative energy scalar flight technology (space engines and warp drive) are using various types of electrical energies, using field energy and wave energy as propulsion with no loss of mass; HOWEVER, negative mass and positive mass (mass is electromagnetic as per the Electromagnetic theory of negative gravity) can not only be in fluctuation, but also be set in deliberate imbalance to induce motion, in theory.
The bottom of this article describes the physical process of the collapse of mass in a system.
. . .
This article corrects an oversight, and clarifies action that propels a craft in space, and in atmosphere. It is presented in a step-by-step analysis to the conclusion that it is the flow dynamics itself which validate the physics used.
It also describes the three types of engines basically, using scalar propulsion (longitudinal and/or parallel wave): the EM drive, ... Dynamic Flow (Townsend Brown), ... and Internal Flow (Vacuum force).
The EM drive and the Cannae electric space engines are pretty cool. They're difficult things to integrate into warp drive physics. See the link:
Interestingly, in the above link, it also describes the Cannae drive, which is the type of engine I detected through my Tesla tower and receiver from an overhead satellite at 1400 volts (detected the electrostatic scanning beam). Watch the two videos.
. . .
The post just below this article says negative energy physics cannot define them.
Also, the Tesla Basic Electrogravity engine design (not really a craft, because of where the pilots sit close to the coils) is noteworthy, showing a flow dynamic up out of the vertical core and flowing around the perimeter of the craft.
The EM and Cannae electric engines use a type of electric force. The EM drive has no "exhaust ports" and so the energy that propels it must escape the faraday cage as scalar and photonic energy waves.
There are two directions of energy flow around the hull and within the hull of the saucer spacecraft, pulling spacetime within the craft, or pushing the frequencies of spacetime around the hull of the craft, for propulsive qualities.
It is typically thought that the energy of the craft collapses to the central accumulator, and is accelerated in the vertical core toward the central accumulator for lift in one direction. However, the energy of the craft can be collapsed to the central accumulator, and pushed up the vertical core to flow AROUND THE PERIMETER of the craft, through the inner hull space.
This effectively achieves a paradox of the collapse of mass, extending from the core out and around the craft.
This is accomplished using negative energy plasma, at high frequency in resonance with the quantum vacuum, produced by the engine flow.
This would create a scalar energy flow -- a monopolar force of negative energy that surrounds the craft.
This style would adapt the LAU-X4 to a White-Alcubierre style dynamic, by adjusting the energy flow up the vertical core to create a negative energy (exotic) plasma field that surrounds the ship in a "warp bubble."
The EM drive has been considered as a reaction-control maneuvering thruster (just in case), however it has been suggested that the hull plating itself would suffice to maneuver the craft, by alternating and rotating hull plating charges, and aligning charges positive to negative in the direction of linear (translation) style movement (translating along its X axis), the ship can rotate and laterally move, and roll and yaw.
In space, you just have to point the ship in the direction of the star you want to visit, and engage the engines in a straight line. Turning at that point would stress the ship, because it would invariably depend upon changing the field flows of the circulating plasma around the ship.
So these are two flow directions: up the core, or down the core. The OTC-X1 engine will have to mesh with the upper portions of the craft's energy flow around the hull.
If the flow were down the vertical core and out the bottom of the OTC-X1 hull, it would act as exerting pressure similar to the EM drive (exhaling to move). Scalar energy is drawn into the center of the ship, and the hull shields the pilots (inhaling to move).
If the other way, it would use more of the hull for a propulsive force like wings flapping in the vacuum of space.
Either the energy moves the ship along, in the direction of its own travel over the hull, or the energy pushes the ship in the opposite direction (action-reaction), using either vacuum physics or Newtonian physics respectively.
If using Newtonian physics, there would be a little resistance of momentum from the vertical core pushing up, instead of pushing down. This is where negative energy physics and positive energy physics start to breakdown, and break away from each other.
Now it would seem that the LAU-X4 conventionally already uses either directed propulsion, or dynamic propulsion.
The scalar energy traveling down the vertical core expands outward at the Central Accumulator, yet maintains a tight beam behind the ship as propulsion (particular due to the mass-reduction field generated by the scalar energy of resonance along the disk).
And yet, the flow around the hull can determine the Central Accumulator as the focal point which is pulled upward, pulling the spacecraft upward (forward, in that flight mode).
We're not really sure yet, which direction the vertical impeller has to spin, to get it to work in space (vacuum).
More specifically, the impeller works in theory because the EM drive works -- as an electrical force engine, but the impeller uses static scalar forces in rotation and direction / angular momentum, but those forces are intended to tweak the frequency of time, causing space to warp accordingly.
Either way, circulating exotic plasma flow around the hull seems to be the general consensus, in consulting.
The OTC-X1 also needs a circulating flow around its top hull (at the bottom of the craft).
Other craft designs use just capacitors in three corners of a triangular-shaped hull.
We've got a little margin of error and room to play, here, along with interchangeability in a base design geometry, AND an Outer Ring power energizer (at least with a 40,000 watt output minus the OTC-X1).
The vertical core is the only engine that has not been seen to work in any documentable and researchable sense. However this also deals with plasma flow, too. I would say the resistance over the vertical core would be far greater a force to spin and push against, needing considerable energy to do so. But if using scalar methods, then an air/plasma flow might conduct itself along, and speed up the engine.
That is what gives it viability, is its vortex plasma-flow dynamic, using the central accumulator as an electrical ground. After all, it is designed to accumulate the scalar negative mass flows as the central balance of the ship.
The EM drive does not use negative energy physics at all.
So then, the image on the right accumulates a far greater amount of energy, negative energy, at the central accumulator by design of all engines working in harmony and in tandem.
The image on the left now would seem to be pushing itself up due to the flow over the "wings," and also pulling itself up as the energy takes the return path through the lower central capacitor.
So the image to the left seems to demonstrate the White-Alcubierre negative energy principle in a dynamic sense along the hull, expanding space on the bell shape and contracting space into it's bottom middle, compressing space inside the bottom capacitor.
These TWO DYNAMICS are BOTH quite valid, and both demonstrate viability.
The inertia and mass-reduced gravity cancellation spacetime forces move the ship.
It will pull itself along, or push itself along. But those forces do not come into equilibrium, so there is motion / energy. If the energy pulls itself, it pulls the craft. If it pushes, then it will propel the craft. The energy dictates the physics being used. Knowing how the energy moves is knowing how the craft moves. The craft will work the same way according to the direction of the energy flows.
If you put a propeller on the back of an airplane, or in front of it, it will still work in the same way that the energy of its propulsion will work.
In fact, it could be seen that these two styles of flow dynamics in the saucer shapes, is a warp drive style (Tesla Basic Electrogravity), and a hyperdrive / tachyon drive style (LAU-X4).
Time dilation principles must occur in any kind of FTL (faster than light) engine system, be it a warp drive, or a hyperdrive, or a light drive. ... or a beam ship.
If the vertical impeller pushes energy upward (and flowing it back down around the hull to the bottom), then it would not be using Newtonian physics, but would be traveling in the direction of the INERTIA of the negative energy flow -- traveling along in the direction of where its energy is projected -- traveling in the direction of the energy vacuum force.
It remains to be seen due to the nature of the OTC-X1 (viability) instead of the untested Tesla Basic Electrogravity craft, AKA the Haunebu II ... which actually would make it already tested back in WWII. ...
Hard to determine without an engine test.
If one understands the White-Alcubierre theory, then spacetime is compressed in front of the ship and expanded behind the ship. The LAU-X4 is based on that principle as per design; however, in light of the EM drive, the EM drive does not use that style of physics.
I would suggest an engine test.
There is one final factor to consider:
The vertical impeller spinning downward, but using electrically charged surfaces to pull the air/plasma up, as the vertical impeller speeds up the air flow electrically (like ion wind) in a geometrical dimension of acceleration -- compressing the scalar frequency in that sense -- and giving the flow dynamics from top down and around the hull.
Regardless, it's a moving surface area, and if spiraling down mechanically while spiraling air up through means of magneto-electrostatic ionizing charges, then there is a little more surface area to travel. And with negative mass, that slight lift could be just enough to kick it into high gear.
Plasma flow in a dynamic hull shape is the key. Even the EM drive will create exhaust through photonic and electrical-plasma thrust (creating a beautiful aurora in an atmosphere), due to its cone-shape (like the auroras from Elon Musk's rocket, and launches in Russia, China, and Japan).
What does a microwave EM frequency do to metal? It makes plasma.
I don't have these answers. I would suggest that these systems be tested.
The question is ... when the static force is put on top of the craft, can it be considered a negative mass force, essentially in the expansion of the static force, compressing spacetime frequency (increasing the volts to bring that waveform in tight)? And in that sense creates lift not from action/reaction, but from a loss of mass equilibrium, in the sense that one must lose one's balance forward to take a step?
That is not quite in the Newtonian sense of the Law of billiards, of the motion of rocks. Newtonian physics assumes mass to be unchanging. But warp drive physics uses changes of positive and negative mass to induce change of position -- call it movement.
Warp drive does not use Newtonian physics, but is not in violation otherwise of natural universal laws. It may be hard to understand it, but the only engine here that has not been tested before in the last 100 years, is the impeller. Townsend Brown, John Searle, Otis T. Carr, Viktor Shauberger and the project paperclip scientists all have historical validation, and modern validation.
Russians have tested levitating tops that spin and spiral under antigravity forces, too. These systems are a lot more valid than people think. I'm starting to notice more spiral and flat impeller designs popping up these days, in fact. An impeller is just a plate stack that spins after all.
Spin creates force and inertia.
If a craft sets an inertial frequency in a direction, it should be expected to travel in that direction of its inertia, created by magnetostatic electromagnetic gravity changes. That is the basis of warp drive, of which the EM drive does not qualify as such, and it uses positive energy.
The nature of negative electromagnetic mass has been described in great detail throughout this website. Negative mass has been measured in labs in Germany. Plasma frequency and flow, of a certain type of plasma of negative energy (exotic) has also been validated mathematically and experimentally at this point in time. It can be assumed and should be assumed that exotic (negative EM-mass; scalar) plasma flow creates changes in mass which does not induce motion, but induces changes of inertia within a system.
It's obvious that there is a need to re-evaluate the laws of physics, particularly when proof such as seen in the article, "Electret - Basic Reactionless Free Energy" on the Free Energy / Tesla page, does exist.
Plasma Engines as an addendum and aside:
Negative energy exotic plasma flow as magnetostatic energy is the key to understanding warp drive propulsion. That starts with Tesla. There is a strange force incolved here which is incompatible with Newtonian physics because Newtonian assumes mass as unchanging, whereas warp drive relies on the change of mass to not induce motion, but a change of internalized inertia and frequency.
It moves by losing its balance forward, similar to how one takes a step forward. Walking, one loses one's balance forward, regains it, loses it, regains it in stable-instability.
It is an internalized force of energy tho which is responsible for a change of position -- call it movement.
This is where we are, currently, with the burden of testing these systems.
Townsend Brown style antigravity is also now known -- how to achieve it and how it works.
I think we're standing on the firm ground of theory at this point, having PROVEN ... truth .. or rather, fact.
I want to thank everyone involved with pushing this along. It is truly amazing.
The simple fact of proving a reactionless system, also proves the aspect of reactionless inertia - the basis of warp drive physics and theory (which includes Townsend Brown), and this is seen in the "Electrets - Basic Reactionless Free Energy" article. If you consider electrons have mass, but there is no mass given up from the electret, then it is setting electrons in motion through its crystalline geometry, and then even yet, what about the field effect that sets things into motion, that is a type of inertia because motion is a type of inertia, and electrical motion and electrical inertia can be a positive or a negative value according to the White-Alcubierre model.
I'm a lot more clear now at least, with eliminating the controversy of two things in paradox with each other, regarding these physics.
There really should not be any controversy. The only question is which way does the plasma flow?
Plasma engines are on the less-known side ... I don't know what I can do about that because it's going to use Newtonian physics. So it would be hard to correlate those without walking away from a pure strain of type of physics.
Plasma generates force that moves a craft by thrust. Okay, so plasma generates a force. How does it work without a change of mass; there has to be a change of mass involved, and it would be easier for it to get lighter than heavier. It can be seen the changes of inertia and frequency, electrically, in the basic definition of a plasma engine:
However, the typical sense of plasma engines is something that uses fuel and Newtonian physics.
Plasma does not have to be hot (heated to blow out the back of a rocket), it can also be cold plasma (maybe just a tad bit warm) by ionizing air at high frequency, and using an applied bit of a vacuum.
Oh, if only it weren't for those darned nondisclosure agreements Dr. Harold White had to sign regarding what he has said as technology "already existing beyond warp drive" ... then maybe there would be a little more public information about this sort of thing. But there isn't. A lot of stuff in private, though.
We have the keys to magnetostatic inertia however, and that includes plasma as a form or medium of static electromagnetic mass. Gravity cancellation is the way that warp drive works. The final step is to get it from theory to device. And where we also have air-flow involved, and the presence of air involved in electrogravity flight, and lifters, due to the static force, then there needs to be another consideration.
The mere presence of air is what a static force uses, although a static field can be felt outside a vacuum jar. Plasma carries the static force, and conducts scalar energy fields, as well as being the result of scalar energy fields. These longitudinal and parallel waves take particular shape with plasma, due to high frequency. Plasma is an electrically conductive active medium.
Plasma plays the role of resonance with the active vacuum of the universe. That is the medium that carries the field-energy generated from within the engines and between coils; the plasma carries that field around an airframe, and is magnetized to the airframe as a sheet or corona of energy flowing dynamically.
It creates a frequency change, and carrying the scalar wave negative energy, conducts superconductively along the airframe (hull).
Plasma at a certain quality and frequency will also allow for faster-than-light travel, carrying electron-mass faster than light in a field through radiating frequency bands. That means that the plasma itself is beyond superconductive (light speed), moving in parallel and longitudinally at the speed of those wave-shapes (confirmed in private and independent tests outside university resources).
That then is generating a force-field of where negative mass exists isolating an internal mass -- which has inertia -- of all the mass inside the field, in the craft. The negative mass envelope is an event horizon of inertia. The concept applies to a ball of weight energized by a wire in a field that allows for levitation. An event horizon of light however, is what is observed. Sometimes a craft morphs into a ball of light if it's far enough away, if anyone has ever seen that.
That is the concept, in any regards, that a field or bubble of negative energy that causes craft to levitate (like the OTC-X1), and achieve rapid change of position. The EM drive will levitate, but the physics are different concerning that.
Achieving levitation and mass-reduction in the lab, carries an additional step of directing plasma flow around a larger air-frame -- it is the conductivity of the negative energy along the hull.
This applies also, to the impeller:
A conductivity of negative energy through the impeller is benefited by a force of inertia and acceleration that the impeller generously provides. This force is multiplied and conducted in a negative energy field, spinning it, and pushing/pulling it. A static force that pushing upon a static force will interact and their waves interfere, and a field can be changed in its motion, therefore in its inertia, at a frequency which electrically can be transformed.
If we are using negative inertia, then the field of innate movement might resemble travel in the direction of its force, in a reactionless sense. If the static force is on top of the craft, then compression from the bottom up could off-balance the equilibrium and assist in plasma flow around the hull from top around to bottom . . .
Pretty interesting all around; these things do have to be considered.
Points of note:
The flow around the hull grounds to the central accumulator. The bottom of the ship is the ground - the lower hull of the OTC-X1.
The reactionless aspect of this is pretty interesting. The nature of inner (internalized) inertia.
I think Bob Lazar talked about this dynamic using element 115 where the flow goes up and around the hull.
In fact I remember plasma flow around the hull like this was a proposed design many years ago.
Obvious Design Shift:
A coil like this Tesla Basic Antigravity setup, like the Tesla tower also, will put a charge either on the top or on the bottom of the end of the coil, according to the DC polarity of a small secondary actuating coil wound around the main tall coil in the vertical core. The secondary actuating coil can be held an inch off from touching the main tall, vertical coil in the center of the craft shown above.
That is to say you can put your static on top or on the bottom, by switching the leads on your battery (to simplify).
The known ways to achieve antigravity / magnetostatic lift, using aspects of reactionless inertia, mass reduction, in fields and in current flows of negative magnetostatic energy, and gravity/inertia cancellation, as frequency of such an electric-light craft, are all pretty much looking the same ways.
This Tesla style of magneto-electrostatic warp drive dynamics and physics is the easiest way to work with. And, very mysterious types of energy have physically been felt from working with this technology, not your run-of-the-mill static ionic charges, but electrical energies that feel like water, like real substance, a thing in itself -- a type of negative plasma (felt at the base of the old Tesla tower shown on the Tesla Engineering Physics page, and witnessed).
This electric magnetostatic energy, charging the outside of a copper sphere run on a wire into a nice positive charge at the frequency that matches Earth surface charge could easily repel itself off the surface of the Earth.
In space, its own inertia would have to carry it, kind of like how the EM drive works, but since we're dealing already with a lifting platform generating negative mass (the OTC-X1, ironically endorsed on Dr. Harold White's personal youtube channel), then we have to work with negative mass systems, meaning Newtonian physics may or may not work.
Electrostatic lift has been seen to work, as seen in electrostatic lifters (Construction page).
The only question there is of the nature of vacuum conditions. Whereas we can now use EM drives, and get going pretty quickly because of the OTC-X1 engine, and the physics are pretty well understood there, now, there may still be another way, using dynamic negative energy flow, which harnesses active vacuum energy, in resonance with a magnetic field.
There are two forms of this flow: dynamic, and impeller styles.
A static charge alone does not seem to want to do much, but put it in motion, raise its frequency, and make sure it's derived along the horizontal zero axis plane parallel to the polar collapse of a transverse electromagnetic field ...
Adjusting hull polarity using charged hull plate sections could affect wave interference in an already active magnetostatic exotic plasma field which causes the craft to want to move and turn and rotate, etc, using electrical scalar forces. It also acts as an electrical shield from ray particles and radiation, if it changes the density of mass by taking the ship out of a field of conventional inertial gravity frequency ...... best way I can explain it, and this is the kind of thing we are wanting in a warp drive.
There are some theories out there in private, saying that yes, this stuff could work. In particular, it is the plasma aspect that people are seriously looking into, which is why I'm talking a lot about it.
Some magnetostatic fluids are accelerated up to light speed to create mass which cancels itself (gravity cancellation), but the Tesla system is based on field flows that are electromagnetic and static in nature, that invert upon mass to create negative mass/energy conditions.
This stuff is actually working in private laboratories, that I have been informed of in correspondences; and there is proof of this type of system working in a vacuum, using the di-electric and magnetic hull plating layers (Construction page).
The Cannae space drive makes use of a capacitor plate stack to drive itself with parallel electrostatic waves (scanning beam), but that again is using positive energy, which is a weak force on the universal substance.
A spiral shape, like the spiraled bare electric wire around a squirrel cage can be made into blades that spiral (like capacitor fan blades, maybe detached from each other and slightly overlapping), affixed OVER a central shaft, that is coiled in magnet wire, but where some of that coil is exposed, to the inner vertical core interior. Wire, plate, capacitor stacks, spiraled stacks, electricity flows in the way it's going to flow, and when using magnetostatic energy, it works in interestingly dynamic ways. Yeah, it's a good idea, because it can be moved and spun, like spinning a coil of wire, and like spinning a static impeller.
. . .
I think it's a good idea, and I think this is how Humanity is going to see its first public warp drive. Everything I'm reading and seeing and hearing is all lending itself to this style of geometry, and action.
Some of that Tesla energy also is not what it seems to be if pulling a static vacuum from a magnetic field (like electrical "water," a very unusual sensation that is not well known to the public). If there is this other force, like a force of chi, which is similar to the energies of the kundalini of the living body, which can sometimes feel heavy, hard as stone, or light as a feather, then energy is known through observation (through sensation, not through visual observation) to act like a substance, which can act upon matter ...
The theory applies to the collapse of electromagnetic fields around the outside, toward the center (following characteristics of a collapsing EM field, which collapses from the poles, and collapses to the center), which resonates with a central magnet, longitudinally. This applies to the OTC-X1 in particular, as the current is carried in the zero magnetic plane of all aligned magnetic fields. Resonance in this manner reduces mass of the entire system, from outer electromagnets to inner magnetic core.
This is a scalar magneto-static resonance (negative energy resonance), as seen in the OTC-X1, the Basic Tesla Electrogravity, Townsend Brown's work, the MEG, and other similar technologies. This resonance reduces the mass of substance, in a field area, because mass is electromagnetic.
(In fact, one of the ways to measure the mass of an electron is to send it near an electromagnetic field, and track its curved path. Keep in mind, an electron is a quantum object, meaning it's not a real object; it's momentum and position cannot be simultaneously measured. So it's momentum is what is being measured electromagnetically, measuring an electron's inertia as a consequence. Because matter is not solid, but comprised of forcefields, then all matter in the universe is electromagnetic energy, as the physical substance of the universe)
This applies to the vertical core of the LAU-X4, as well as the Outer Ring through the hull space. The vertical core needs to be magnetic and conductive, and able to resonate.
The same geometry exists in the Outer Ring, and private tests have revealed that when an inductive load is applied (through resonating transformers), then the MEG will levitate, under applied load. This also applies to the OTC-X1. I like to talk about private testing for verification, but I cannot reveal the details, because it was private. So this will have to suffice for now.
With levitation comes a measured quality of negative mass. This has also been verified in independent private labs. So the Outer Ring generates a negative mass field, by itself, and is able to carry that field from the OTC-X1 through the Outer Ring as it expands the field from the OTC-X1.
The vertical impeller then serves as the magnetic (electromagnetic) center. It can be coiled without interruption, and a separate frame over the shaft to support the spiraling individual capacitor plates (similar to the Cannae electric space drive); and it should have a magnetic core. This is why there must be an electrostatic and magnetoSTATIC quality to the dynamic flow around the hull through the core, because the impeller will be able to move and conduct that negative static energy. It is considered negative static energy, particularly with a spark gap somewhere in the system of the Outer Ring; all it takes is just ONE spark gap to change the quality of the energy generated and run through the coils and through the system, which means the spark has to be either at the power supply, or just after the power supply, or within the action that generates the fields itself.
The spark can even be included in the energy dynamic flow, AS THE ENERGY DYNAMIC FLOW, in the form of PLASMA. The vertical impeller is where the plasma is made, other than plasma being made surrounding the Central Accumulator in the OTC-X1, and from within it, because at its core is a spark gap, within the central accumulator, itself.
If you will notice in the LAU-X4 design, a Tesla toroid donut conductor sits atop the vertical core. This also, is where plasma is generated in the core. It was originally designed to conduct down to the Central Accumulator as the electrical ground of the craft. However with an aspect of possible plasma flow from the bottom up, with a dynamic flow from near the top of the hull around it and to the bottom, this can certainly be done electrically, even if the air-flow is reversed to where it aims down to the central accumulator.
The idea of this, is to set into motion an inertia of negative mass energy (negative electrical energy), which would either act in reaction, or as reactionless physics, to give the craft speed and propulsion, due to the negative mass "warp bubble field" giving the craft no inertia, or negative inertia.* <---- The entire concept of warp drive physics: with mass, there is inertia; otherwise without mass, inertia is instant and without gravitational entanglement, "phased to zero" as it were, not experiencing the laws that govern inertia of MASS.
If it isn't violating Newton's laws of inertia and motion, then it isn't a warp drive.
So because of this, the vertical impeller is not just a glorified Cannae electric space drive. The impeller makes use of laws of inertia and motion that are a little different in an applied warp field, that in theory, should provide a tremendous force of relative motion. The engine itself moves and spins, and a Cannae drive, like the EM drive, produces electrical inertial force. It has to resist the mass of the space craft, but if the craft has zero or negative mass, then it only sets the craft's internal force of inertia itself because the craft is not resonating with the inertial and gravitational space around it (not in the same frequency).
There will be inertia inside the craft, in the pilot's space and inside the interior, so a directed beam of inertial force will have a MUCH greater effect, also at MUCH higher frequencies. Frequency must be understood.
Also ... just because air blows inside the craft, doesn't mean that current and electrical dynamic flow cannot conduct from the top around the hull, down to the bottom of the OTC-X1 area. The walls of the vertical core can be conductively insulated from the hull, or made of special material layers to shield the pilots (Faraday Cage). The magneto-static force of pushing the gathered magneto-static energy at the top of the vertical core, with those interference waves and pulsing impulse frequencies (electrical inertia), is how it works.
Even now, the UTRONS have their foundation as electrical-inertial generators because of these new electro-inertial space drives.
I would surmise the Cannae drive works from pulsing impulse waves down its shaft, picked up by the capacitors and beamed longitudinally in parallel in a tight beam (as a reaction engine generating electrical thrust). What I detected in my Tesla system started out at 600 volts, flickering from the pulsed frequency, and then rapidly moved into full 1400 volts; so there is a narrow cone-like diffused spread to the tight corridor beam.
As the vertical impeller rotates, it would be easier to pulse energy (due to rotation making electrical contact at certain points), but ... just the act of moving a static force, stretching it, pulling it, pushing it around, that is where the real force will be developed, in the moving of magneto-static negative energy force at high frequency and voltage, in resonance di-electrically and magnetically. Again, the veins on the impeller are constructed of layered di-electric and magnetic sheets similar to what is described in the Townsend Brown section on the Construction Page.
The assumption of the impeller is the same assumption made, that a propeller can be in front of an airplane, or behind the airplane, either pushing or pulling, in a reaction sense ...
Using conventional Newtonian laws, if it cannot push a thrust behind the LAU-X4 ship (below the OTC-X1 engine), then it can pull upon the space in front of it -- a negative thrust, so to put it. Conductive plasma flow around the hull in the direction depicted by the Tesla Basic Electrogravity image can be achieved just through conductivity; if the top Tesla toroid is the source of the static plasma, then it can conduct around the hull as well as down the impeller to the Central Accumulator ground (acting as the bottom capacitor).
The secondary goal is to get the plasma flows acting as corona, or electrical sheets that blanket all conductive surface areas, generating a dynamic field, which is also in motion electrically (electro-inertia). ....... it is guessed that the Outer Ring would generate at least 40,000 watts of power. God only knows how much in the lower OTC-X1 engine, probably closer to 200,000 if it's resonating like the MEG resonates, powered from the Central Accumulator, and probably from the Utrons, too (the Utrons have about 3 different design possibilities, both according to Otis Carr's materials and documents, plus from a deductive process of reverse physics). That is a LOT of potential power to move a space drive with zero or negative mass.
I want to leave it on a note:
I'm sharing a short video which is a highly condensed version which includes a snippet of zero point reactionless drive technology, taken from a presentation from Marko Rodin as well as Dr. Steven Greer, describing a reactionless coil that is spinning a magnet without any power going to it (the power was disconnected but the coil was still energized, and this phenomena keeps showing up more and more. The video does not mention though that once the power is removed, it continues to spin the magnet for about 5 minutes after, but .. the magnet is picked up and walked around the room away from the coil also, and it still is spinning through entanglement).
This video might not be in the right place but, it makes a point.
Here's the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkLJnm_Eq-I&feature=youtu.be