Warp-Drive-Physics.com
See: lightdrive-ascension.com
  • Home
  • Warp Drive News
  • Warp Drive Blog
  • Metaphysics Blog
  • Warp Drive Philosophy
  • Warp Drive Engineering
  • Tesla Engineering Physics
  • Construction
  • Construction Blog
  • Updates and Design Improvements
  • Outer Ring
  • Exo-Archaeoastronomy Blog
  • Planetary News
  • Ascension Blog
  • General Blog
  • Free Energy / Tesla
  • Info

Paradoxes of Unity -- Expanded View

12/20/2015

0 Comments

 
Article revision:  12/16/17  ...   eliminated the redundancy and added an update


The pictures below represents the unifiable paradox. X and Y are two arguments that bicker eternally, yet in their UNITY the wholeness creates the Circle -- not only the combination of both arguments, but also in a Third unique inclusion of both X and Y. The Wholeness.

There are no dualities because a duality is X negates the existence of Y. True OR False. But True OR False is a dualistic argument. In Reality, matter itself is 1/2 of the whole. Matter unifies as Light. Light is the Unity, Matter is the PARADOX, whereas there are no real dualities.

Any sufficiently evolved civilization knows this as true. However many Humans don't, and so you get DISTORTIONS of the truth. Yin and Yang is Motion AND Stillness, and together creates a wholeness of that which is beyond merely the physical, but also a unity of Light, an expression of the Soul.


Picture
Picture


X and Y = R ... but R (the name of the circle, not just the radius but ALSO it is considered the wholeness; "circle of R") is not just X and Y, it is UNIQUE, of it's OWN validity, not merely an addition of two opposing arguments. This is why when you look beyond the veil of opposites and dualities, you receive an infinite plethora of information, once the veil is UNLOCKED.

Light is a unique form of it's own, without time and without space, BUT also since Light CREATES time and space, then light is MORE AND Beyond. Therefore it is NOT a duality, and also it cannot be said that matter physical reality is a duality, but a PARADOX. Because time is a thing of the physical, and time is very much ridden with paradoxes, then that should be intuitively obvious. Grandfather paradox is a prime example of the nature of physical matter reality.





​

Because of the paradox included in a structure of reasoning:


​
Physics claims are founded in a "deep-set" logical reasoning where "logical leaps in thought" can be made and allowed by using paradoxical structure in a reasoning system -- mathematical reasoning and truly congruent thought.


Because the Paradox can be seen as the origin and structure and living nature of the universe, along with for example, vortex and fractal geometry, then this is an EASIER way to logically explain and to describe the universe. 

I will save the Tertiary Paradox of Creation until later, in a book, because of its startling implications. Basically however, it is based on the Three Creative Dilemmas (see the Metaphysics blog). Action creates Identity by its very nature, and since action does not need cause and effect, or causality, then a singular point of Grand Creation in time also establishes its own causality, particularly because of the nature of the infinity of time which would create an infinite past and an infinite future with the Origin in the Now, hence always in a state of Becoming. 

If action creates identity, otherwise there would be nothing upon which action can act, then the conscious realization resulting is the amazement by consciousness itself that it came into existence from never having to have previously existed. Consciousness directly pertains to identity, as well as action since identity must act or cease to be conscious. This leads us to the Creation of Consciousness itself, of all things, which we can consider as "God," since "God" is "Utlimate Unity of All Action."  However, that states that God is the Creation, whilst "Source of Creation" is beyond Self, and beyond Identity, and beyond Consciousness.

Soul is beyond mind and is perceptive, curious, and creative. Soul creates consciousness; and consciousness can either impede self in alignment with Source, or Align with Source. 

I want to make a distinction however, that as perception creates action, none-the-less, we perceive Source as Love; and unconditional, infinite Love has specific rules about Existence -- the Path of Love. 

This does not mean that the Soul Creates Source; No.  Source Creates Life. Source always existed, and will always exist; creation is existence; existence creates. The existence of Source is beyond Creation. There are obviously different levels, layers -- forms and formless -- of Existence.

The Soul is Formless, beyond Consciousness, pure perception and feeling; Living Vitality and Knowing. Mind is unified though, and grounds the soul as the Ground of the Soul (The Ground Light of Consciousness; Light is a form of consciousness in alignment with Source, unifying Ultimately as Love, Light, Life-energy).

-- The House of Love; the House is Created by the Soul; the house is the reflection of mind, Created and always becoming, because infinity cannot manifest with form without destroying it unless energy is always being created in parallel and in other realities, realms, and dimensions, all the time.


Energy is Infinite, just as matter and reality and universes and possibilities are just as infinite.

Of COURSE Energy is Created in Abundance!  However energy in consumption is only limited to a local system, and RELATIVELY so (kind of like a bubble or sphere of conscious-created root reality). At that point is where our modern physics completely falls apart, because of the inability for the Human mind to reason the paradox, and to erroneously assume everything is dualistic in structure.



​

​

Update:



I always am thinking that so much conflict could be overcome when people realize that their arguments are not necessarily against each others, but coinciding and complimenting a greater reality of existing (with, not against).

Even the nature of lower ego self and higher nonphysical self (eternal Identity; the soul) is all an expression of the wholeness, whereas no separation exists. 

Yin and Yang, motion and stillness, hard and soft, male and female, are two separate "events" but in their unity, there is flow back and forth, and ultimately we can envision it as the ever-growing spiral of phi, the sacred spiral. 

This is also why Marko Rodin, the inventor of the Rodin coil and vortex mathematics says that we only have 9 fingers .. that when we put our hands together, fingers spread apart, thumbs touching, that there is symmetry there. The thumb is one digit; universal structure would seem to separate that. But this is also why Tesla's mathematics and vortex mathematics is based on 9, not a base 10 like our decimal system. 


​
The right brained aspect of this is easily set as example through martial arts, with the yin and yang as part of the flow, of say like water and motion; when to meet an opponent with force, and when to use one's opponent's force as the tool to overcome him. 

And whereas we are realities of selves, as one is defined in part also by one's reality and one's surroundings, then the unity of the 2 as one is seen as in the Gospels of St. Thomas -- the kingdom of Heaven is within us and surrounds us, as a unity that cannot be separate. That gets into creation, that we create our own realities, that we co-create reality. 

None of this knowledge would be possible under a duality-based system where one views oneself as SEPARATE from the people, places, and events where one finds oneself, wherever one goes, creating one's reality as one understands one's own existence to be -- self realization.

I suppose it's easier just to say there is no real duality, that the Yin and Yang are one ... however, it is necessary to honor individually and distinctly, the Yin and the Yang, for they are both valid as individual energies, EVEN THOUGH they are both of One Body. 

As soon as there becomes ANY conflict with one's reality however, is when the unity connection is momentarily lost, and thus takes shape as duality, instead of unity.







​If the universe were a duality, then light-consciousness could not define it.

The truth is, that reality is on the whole, a unified construct of light consciousness, just expressing itself as a paradox of itself.

There are no dualities, just as there are no real objects.  Only a duality-reality is object-based.

All is One, as a paradoxical structure shows.  One unified Source field of existence.  The ongoing paradox invariably depends upon your point of view.  A wholeness of view however, is the essence of Unity of all parts; there are no parts.

A belief in, or a mental framework of duality results in judgment, conflict, drama, and a belief that reality is separate from Source -- a belief that reality is only material, action that is seen as an object.

​There is no real duality, and THAT is a Paradox.

. . .

​Light creates its own shadow.  There is no duality.












0 Comments

Paradox of Electrostatic current

12/10/2015

2 Comments

 

An electromagnetic current is an energy type that can be used to create a magnetic field in a coil of wire, hence "Electromagnetic."

An electric current as an energy type that is transmitted in a coil of wire that does NOT form a magnet is just "electric," and you can still transfer it as a current.  Only trouble is that most people consider an electric current also as that which has a magnet, but it won't generate a magnet unless the current is polarized, and just transferring it in a coil of wire is not enough to polarize the current, but a diode can polarize the current, or otherwise minerals and materials that demonstrate diode-like action.


"electrostatic" current is an oxymoron since obviously it wouldn't be "static" in a current. I guess it would just be "electric." An electric current without a magnetic component to it, unable to form an electromagnet ..  what is that called?  Just "electric" current? If as Tesla said light is a magneto-electrostatic wave, or otherwise just "magneto-electrostatic," then how did Tesla consider static charges that arc from one point to another if static is non-moving?  I think it's more of a paradox than an oxymoron.

If static charges are held un-moving, but spun around on a disk, then they would be "ionic."  But static charges without a magnetic component to the energy spun on a disk would be ...  what?  I consider "ionic" charges to be electroMAGNETIC.  As of yet, I lack a real word to describe that phenomena...  


If you can transfer a magneto-electrostatic current through the air, for there is a magneto-electrostatic energy type as named by Tesla that denotes the ability for a spark to form in air, but not in a vacuum, so he and Hertz both agreed that it is "magneto-electrostatic," then how is the "ying-yang" of "motion and stillness" resolved in a wave?  

In an attempt to understand what Tesla was talking about, I've resorted to redefining what electrostatic current is, because an electrostatic charge can arc as a current from one point to the other, or as like in a Jacob's ladder, that charge will drift up, thus it is in motion and not static or un-moving; rather it is static which is "in the air" as Tesla considered it.


All I'm suggesting is to not become too limited in absolute definitions. Static charges easily move across the sky, and sometimes for many miles.

WHO AM I to question the Big Guy, Tesla, when he gave us our entire modern world of our electrical infrastructure?

In a vacuum, an electroSTATIC wave would be "di-electric."   A plasma beam would have electrostatic properties or similarities, in a vacuum, thusly, since such a beam is electrically charged.  Plasma takes it's own air with it; it doesn't have to be breathable air, just a physical medium of particles that allow for such a transfer of energy.  CERN is making use of "iron plasma," for example here lately.

Di-electric refers more to the alignment of charges though, rather than the transfer of energy, although both aspects are present.


So, I am asking the reader to consider these things next time you run across the phrase, "electrostatic current."  



..........................



In correspondence, a friend of mine (Walter) pointed this out to me:

"Electrostatic current is an oxymoron. Current is sustained motion. Static is not. You can have an electrostatic potential difference, which can be discharged; and, in that pico-second of time, I reckon you may call it 'movement'; but, practically, it is not current; because, it's not sustained motion (of electrons). "


This led me to this:


Regarding electrostatic CURRENT. That is not the same as electrostatic discharges then? Whereas an electrostatic discharge can move, however it is not a sustained flow? hmmmm... Fascinating. What about a sustained discharge moving from point A to point B say a mile away? Would that be considered a current? A "course of a flow" is simultaneous say would still denote polarity, but also denote movement through time. In case of teleportation though, which is simultaneous in time (for example with the photon spin reversal experiments without limitation due to distance, speed, or time), how can one consider a "current" or a "course and direction?"

In an electron for example, where one can either measure position OR momentum, but not both at once, then current would have to be a paradox in itself, since the electron is not behaving like an actual object. In an electromagnetic current, there is spin and polarity in one way only. Transfer of electromagnetic waves or current at the speed of light is only in regard to time, since light itself is simultaneous according to light's own experience -- case in point with the twin photon experiments. It is not the speed of light we measure, but the frequency of time in relative gravity fields.

A sustained discharge would have to be considered a current because regardless you have movement of time. The only time a current would not apply as a definition though, would be in the case of teleportation with regard to simultaneous re-positioning. Also if you were to teleport from point A to [in the direction towards] point B, then the discontinuity through spacetime would be a "discharge" of position.





The biggest reason I consider electrostatic current, is because an electrostatic charge can be made to run along a wire to a piece of equipment that will generate an electric field, which is very hard to measure on a voltmeter at all (because there is no magnetic component), but otherwise creates a static field regardless that influences biological living energy systems.

I LIVED in a sustained Tesla field for several years, I could feel it, and a friend of mine became very disoriented from it once and literally started rippling or waving like a flag as he was standing.  The only thing he felt was "disorientation."  Believe me, it will affect you and shock you, but in more ethereal ways; and too, it will open portals, esoterically speaking between two points.  I experienced it. The energy field allowed for other beings to emerge and interact with me through my third eye, and crown chakra, and indeed through my entire biological living and ethereal chakra system.  It is a true electrostatic current that I discuss (able to be run along a wire), however it appears to be more "ethereal" in nature simply because it is different than what conventional instruments can measure, although such a thing is responsible also for amplification of resonating coil systems to generate a tremendous amount of energy.

I am perfectly okay now, however please see the metaphysics blog post of "Dragon Kundalini" for a further understanding of this.

​http://www.warp-drive-physics.com/metaphysics-blog/dragon-kundalini




Electrostatic energy fields, transmitted along a wire to generate other electrostatic fields do exist.   And likewise, electrostatic currents also exist without the need to be transferred along a wire.  In fact, I was able to wirelessly transfer the energy from a single AA battery through the electrostatic energy fields without a wire and with very, very simple equipment, much in the same way Tesla was also able to do it.

These energy fields can be physically felt as walls between pillars (tall coils), as well as corridors between field generators.  They affect life as well.  Grass will grow tall and toward these field generators, sometimes bending at 90 degree right angles, which further charges up the equipment. 

Some consider these energy fields as Chi energy.

​
​



​



2 Comments

    LAU

    General Blog

    Archives

    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

email:  unifiableparadox@gmail.com
            Creation date: March 15th, 2013
            Common Copyright Pure Trust
            Educational Resource
Proudly powered by Weebly
Photo used under Creative Commons from Ethan Hein