Di-Electrostatic Propulsion
I been doing it the hard way all this time ... Apparently, electrogravity works in a vacuum, also as I mentioned on the General Blog article about the vertical impeller, that di-electrostatic forces alone create propulsion, and can warp time.
Rotating di-electrostatic forces have more force, but they don't have to be rotating.
Negative energy is really all it takes, even run on a wire.
Truly amazing! Those forces can be contained in a box (a ship hull) to work, without being exposed to atmosphere, meaning they do indeed work in the vacuum of space, and much easier.
I'm totally astounded and shocked by all of this! It goes way beyond simple electrogravity lifters, which harness the electric force of positive energy, and in the wrong type of geometry ... It's no wonder Townsend Brown's saucers flew so effortlessly, because it really is just that simple!
Di-electrostatic plates. Rotate them (rotate the fields), charge them higher or lower voltage, set the field in certain polarities for flight modes ... This might be a little blurry, but the direction the craft travels is toward the positive polarity, be it on top, or forward, or both top and forward for lift and lateral motion. Simple di-electric electrogravity, using magneto-electrostatic energy.
It's fast travel, too. Very rapid, even through space. Even a magneto-electrostatic field in a vacuum will develop a luminous corona. Space is conductive!
If simple di-electrostatic electrogravity is so easy, and able to get us to other planets very quickly, then a warp drive would be astronomically fast to get us to another star.
I'm writing this because enough people have informed me about successful tests of di-electrostatic field propulsion, but I had to have figured it out on my own first, apparently. This really says a lot about the nature of the universe, and for the future of unified physics. This means warp drive really does work!
Since it uses di-electrostatic propulsion, and can do so in a vacuum, it means it is harnessing the force of electron mass, gravitationally.
. . .
The Vertical Impeller General Blog article sums things up nicely.
I don't know what else to say! That image above is from an old rough-draft of my unpublished book. I guess I just never believed it until now.
Actually I do have a couple of things. Away from Earth gravity, time frequencies are much quicker. A ship using simple di-electrostatic propulsion should be able to travel at electrostatic wave speed to reach another planet like Mars. The frequency of that energy is dependant in stronger gravity fields. That is to say just using simple di-electrostatic propulsion, it shouldn't take but under 5 minutes to reach Mars, assuming you're using a couple million volts on the hull plating. Such a high voltage also should help reduce radiation effects within the ship, although high quality radiation shielding is paper thin these days.
You're basically creating a superconductive energy field, but it is an inertial field. That means at superconductive resonance, the inertial energy of electrons in parallel, in a type of wave collapse, travels at its wavespeed. Whatever is inside a bubble of this superconductive inertial energy bubble is going to travel at its wavespeed, because what is carried inside the field must only be able to withstand such a force? But the force is not in counter-reaction, meaning the passengers feel no inertial acceleration; they are not thrown against the back of their chairs. The energy is reactionless. But, that reaction of inertia, is instead an action rather than RE-action. The action of re-action could be seen as the whole type of movement, which is a superconductive and reactionless movement. Does it violate Newton's third law? Yes.
What is within that field can be other engines to lower or cancel gravitational mass, or create a "wormhole corridor" that the ship conducts through even faster than its wave-speed, but at a frequency mathematically proportional to its wave-speed. It would fall under tachyon mechanics at that point. That's the hard stuff. Otherwise minutes to another planet is very easy. And the hard stuff isn't hard, it's just more.
How can that be explained? What's the mechanism? Well ... At this point, I'm willing to say it doesn't matter how it works; it matters that it works, or does not.
What's the point? What if we are somehow quarantined in our Solar system until some amazing Ascension Event, where no one can come in, and no one can leave, from the way, way, way higher ups?
Nothing else to say at this point. Take a look.
Follow Up:
Well, as things have turned out, di-electrostatic hull plating might be an issue. Rather, just using hull plating in a vacuum of space won't work, UNLESS a di-electric substance is used sandwiched between multiple layers like an asymmetrical capacitor, employed as hull plating. Asymmetrical capacitors have been shown to move in a vacuum.
Otherwise, di-electrostatic hull plating will work in an atmosphere no problem.
This is the reason for an internalized engine such as the vertical core which uses air to harness the gravity force; and tests have shown that the electrogravity force cannot be shielded against. So, the electrogravity force penetrates the hull like it is expected to do so.
The impeller is actually a great idea (vertical core). It would have to conduct static forces along the hull though (like the flying cylinders people claim are part of the Solar Warden program).
Lifters don't tend to work so well in a vacuum because of it's wave-shape. It's just a little wire that can't just grab ahold of space and move it (and moving within space). A wire takes up hardly any space. Space is conductive, and it is a substance.
It's like shaping chi, or Ki. There's hard and sharp chi, or soft and flowing chi, floating chi .. Each form will shape an energy field. A wire is not acting in scalar space. A wire is one-dimensional, not two, like how electrons behave. Could be a wedge shape, or a saucer shape, but it's shaping a field.
Electrons, to move through space, have to act at least in 2-dimensions (relative planes or surface shapes). Also, electrical forces and frequencies do shape space and move scalar space, pushing/pulling or squeezing and expanding electrical energy mass and force ... in a way like flapping wings to fly. Frequencies can be pulsed over the hull, in different polarities. Tesla energy does act in, or rather upon scalar space, as a multitude of tests have shown (like lighting lightbulbs submerged in water), meaning able to act upon a vacuum. Plasma wings.
. . .
Overall, these engines do fall into an acceptable range of probable success, however there are some unknowns. It is intriguing to see how all of it falls into place. I really like the negative energy bits, and we know the OTC-X1 worked, and it's great to see how the OTC-X1 and negative energy fits together to transform between positive and negative energies, and along with gravity cancellation using negative and exotic energies.
It's a start, at least. Energy is much better understood. Gravity forces, too. But this is the extent as far as the technology known in the public, and in private circles that have disclosed some aspect of proprietary ... genius.
The best part of it all though, is that nothing has been discarded as definitely having been tested to NOT work. EM drives (electrogravity in the electromagnetic frequency of microwaves) using a gravity cancellation field (OTC-X1) actually could work for very rapid travel to other planets, and use electrogravity hull plating to launch out of an atmosphere, and to land again.
So all is not lost in the noble pursuit. There is definitely something very peculiar about negative energy. The fact that it is now possible to harness it, now that it has been identified, is truly phenomenal.
New technologies will come from this as an off-shoot on the journey to develop warp drive, it's a fair bet.
The internet is such an amazing tool .. but, will we ever see any real videos of these technologies actually in action, it is hard to say. That has been discussed here at warp-drive-physics.com (actually on the Construction Page), and it has been determined actually, that there does need to be a line-in-the-sand as to the extent of what is available for public viewing, as well as for private. Non-disclosure agreements are not quite the same as a classification, because non-disclosures can be offered/issued by anyone, even ole' Fred down the road.
Exactly what is that line-in-the-sand though, is not really a hard boundary, but more of something that is played by ear. No one has ever taken a stab at doing this before to my knowledge (and if I knew, I wouldn't say -- little joke), but the reasoning behind it is that if there are people who believe in the flat Earth and that space doesn't really exist (not just to single them out specifically, but just to keep this somewhat light-hearted), then no one wants to start an argument or controversy that could lead to problems.
Would YOU tell people? Maybe you could tell some people who can handle it, support it, and accept it, and be cool with it most importantly. If people just didn't care, then what's the problem? I guess you'd have to work your ethics out, about that. Basic discernment. I'd tell them this much. I honestly don't know what's out there.
. . .
Experimental follow-up; with discussion
Di-electrostatic propulsion is always a frustrating topic. As simple the concept, when dealing with negative exotic/superconductive energies, there seems to be an easy solution, as long as one understands what negative energy actually is.
Also the vacuum condition is harsh. Electrostatic propulsive fields easily works in the air, and you can feel it. But when in a vacuum, the electrostatic field turns into a plasma field. Some people have a difficult time making a plasma field, and instead make plasma arcs.
Plasma arcs are due to an electromagnetic energy which takes the shortest path. But a static field doesn't discharge; it holds its space, and its shape as a volume of energy.
So the type of energy is just as important as how it is harnessed. Radiant electrostatic fields do not take the shortest path, they conform to shape (taking all paths at once, and discussed on the Tesla Engineering Physics page). So a wire on a lifter isn't going to do as good as a coil, or charge plate, because a wire doesn't make a field unless it works with other wires, or unless the wire takes a shape, either bifilar pancake shape, cylindrical coil, or otherwise evenly-spaced di-electrically coiled.
Di-electrostatic propulsion has been seen to work when the engine itself is housed in a hull-space; and whereas the forces of electrogravity cannot be shielded against (as some experiments have shown); and so, the air for the static field to form is within the hull-space itself, not directly exposed to vacuum.
The thing about the energy though, is that it must be parallel longitudinal Tesla energy dealing with a collapsing magnetic force and a radiant electrostatic force, which in a way is what happens when you pass an electromagnetic current through a series of plates, is that the plates form a static charge di-electrically all along the plate surface areas. But, electromagnetic energy is normally positive energy, and it is not considered electrostatic except only as a by-product of form.
As long as electromagnetic current is running, a capacitor plate will hold its charge as a di-electric field. A typical capacitor has a conductor through the center and plates at 90 degrees along that conductor harnessing a charge in an electromagnetic transverse geometry. If it were in parallel, the conductor would run along one edge of the plate, in parallel. At the point of transverse intersection, of a conductor rod piercing through the center of a conductive plate, the only part that is in parallel is the moment of the intersection itself. I have gotten confused about this before, but as I'm learning, it is apparent to see that the plates pick up the electromagnetic field moreso than a parallel di-electric field.
The di-electric aspect of the capacitor is seen when at least two capacitor plates are used, which are in parallel to each other, otherwise it can be assumed a di-electric potential to always be present unless actualized. The same with a coil of wire. The coil makes an electromagnet, but the single wire still has the potential to form a magnet.
Di-electrostatic propulsion is always a frustrating topic. As simple the concept, when dealing with negative exotic/superconductive energies, there seems to be an easy solution, as long as one understands what negative energy actually is.
Also the vacuum condition is harsh. Electrostatic propulsive fields easily works in the air, and you can feel it. But when in a vacuum, the electrostatic field turns into a plasma field. Some people have a difficult time making a plasma field, and instead make plasma arcs.
Plasma arcs are due to an electromagnetic energy which takes the shortest path. But a static field doesn't discharge; it holds its space, and its shape as a volume of energy.
So the type of energy is just as important as how it is harnessed. Radiant electrostatic fields do not take the shortest path, they conform to shape (taking all paths at once, and discussed on the Tesla Engineering Physics page). So a wire on a lifter isn't going to do as good as a coil, or charge plate, because a wire doesn't make a field unless it works with other wires, or unless the wire takes a shape, either bifilar pancake shape, cylindrical coil, or otherwise evenly-spaced di-electrically coiled.
Di-electrostatic propulsion has been seen to work when the engine itself is housed in a hull-space; and whereas the forces of electrogravity cannot be shielded against (as some experiments have shown); and so, the air for the static field to form is within the hull-space itself, not directly exposed to vacuum.
The thing about the energy though, is that it must be parallel longitudinal Tesla energy dealing with a collapsing magnetic force and a radiant electrostatic force, which in a way is what happens when you pass an electromagnetic current through a series of plates, is that the plates form a static charge di-electrically all along the plate surface areas. But, electromagnetic energy is normally positive energy, and it is not considered electrostatic except only as a by-product of form.
As long as electromagnetic current is running, a capacitor plate will hold its charge as a di-electric field. A typical capacitor has a conductor through the center and plates at 90 degrees along that conductor harnessing a charge in an electromagnetic transverse geometry. If it were in parallel, the conductor would run along one edge of the plate, in parallel. At the point of transverse intersection, of a conductor rod piercing through the center of a conductive plate, the only part that is in parallel is the moment of the intersection itself. I have gotten confused about this before, but as I'm learning, it is apparent to see that the plates pick up the electromagnetic field moreso than a parallel di-electric field.
The di-electric aspect of the capacitor is seen when at least two capacitor plates are used, which are in parallel to each other, otherwise it can be assumed a di-electric potential to always be present unless actualized. The same with a coil of wire. The coil makes an electromagnet, but the single wire still has the potential to form a magnet.
If the conductive rod runs along-side the plate, then it would be in parallel, rather than in transverse piercing through the plate.
Standard ion-Lifter geometry is in parallel with a conductive wire, in that sense, but a lifter's surface area is transverse to the plane of gravity, not in parallel to the plane of gravity. (see the Construction page for a lifter)
In the plates to the left, it looks like a single wire is run in a square. If that were the case, a single wire could form a coil (assuming the wire is run in a spiral) where magnets could pass down the edges in a generator configuration, forming a north pole on top and a south pole on the bottom. But that is transverse geometry, not parallel geometry.
True di-electric parallel geometry is hard-pressed to form a magnet where you want it, because the magnet is out of phase.
This is a tough concept to grasp. It is more efficient to run the wires along the edges rather than through the center, to conduct di-electrically in parallel geometry. Di-electrostatic current won't take a single path, but conducts in parallel over the whole surface area at once. Any time positive energy is run to a single ground wire, like on a standard ionic lifter, a straight path is created instead of a static field. If you notice plasma arcs in a vacuum chamber take the shortest path, usually above where the ground wire is attached below (in vacuum lifter experiments).
Negative energy is mainly electrostatic in nature, already in parallel. When a Tesla tower is charged, then that energy field conducts a magnet through the air as a long lightning discharge. The goal of di-electric gravity in a vacuum is to harness the electrostatic force, which is why asymmetrical capacitors have more success than lifters in a vacuum.
In lifters, positive energy runs to ground in a negative polarity (the ground is positive charge but negative energy, and is electrostatic in nature). The force of electrical grounding is the direction the electricity is travelling in general, and a lifter is designed to form a static field regardless. Tesla energy uses a concept of "radiant rise," which is the uplifting of static energy away from the ground, depending upon polarity (for example if you touch a Vander Graff generator, your hair on your head will stand straight up).
Tesla energy (negative energy) can harness a polarity as long as it is separated between two plates or points, or over a span of distance; polarity will form, along with a direction of electrical motion. The same thing happens with radiant electrostatic energy, naturally forming a polarity even though it is innately non-polarized. Polarity is due to the magnet mostly. In electrostatic energy, polarity is due to position and the abundance of relative charge at one position compared to the other.
Everyone who has posted any kind of video showing electrogravity in a vacuum has always used positive energy electromagnetic current.
Negative energy is unique in that it is not self-defeating, nor self-resisting, and instead of driving the positive electrical force to the ground, it uplifts a negative electrostatic force upward to the air, toward it's positive polarity (which is determined by the shape and charge of its environment just as much as the shape of it's own form).
Huge difference, but will it work in a vacuum?
The answer to that question is yes. Space itself is a conductive space, otherwise plasma couldn't conduct. Also, space is high frequency, otherwise plasma could not conduct as such. If you want higher frequency, just pump a vacuum.
The space inside a container conducts a charge gravitationally, too. When negative energy is used, there develops a natural lift away from gravity because the mass of the energy itself is much less. Therefore the inertia of the energy itself is much less. Yes, energy itself has these aspects, whereas energy-mass is determined mainly through a magnetic aspect of its field. So negative energy is much easier to move around, conduct wirelessly, and transmit wirelessly, just by itself without having to build a transmission power box. I've wirelessly conducted a AA battery before through scalar space, so as long as there was an energy field present to conduct it, with only a few basic coils sitting on the Earth.
If you run a positive wire on the left edge of a plate, and a positive wire on the right edge of a plate, then the plate is going to be a positive charge, and you'll find out if you touch the plate and the electricity runs to ground through you. ... Using negative energy, it is the same, but it won't run to ground, it will conduct out the top of your head. Tesla put on some shows demonstrating this as he stood on a conductive platform charged with a million volts, but was at a very high frequency negative energy.
Standard ion-Lifter geometry is in parallel with a conductive wire, in that sense, but a lifter's surface area is transverse to the plane of gravity, not in parallel to the plane of gravity. (see the Construction page for a lifter)
In the plates to the left, it looks like a single wire is run in a square. If that were the case, a single wire could form a coil (assuming the wire is run in a spiral) where magnets could pass down the edges in a generator configuration, forming a north pole on top and a south pole on the bottom. But that is transverse geometry, not parallel geometry.
True di-electric parallel geometry is hard-pressed to form a magnet where you want it, because the magnet is out of phase.
This is a tough concept to grasp. It is more efficient to run the wires along the edges rather than through the center, to conduct di-electrically in parallel geometry. Di-electrostatic current won't take a single path, but conducts in parallel over the whole surface area at once. Any time positive energy is run to a single ground wire, like on a standard ionic lifter, a straight path is created instead of a static field. If you notice plasma arcs in a vacuum chamber take the shortest path, usually above where the ground wire is attached below (in vacuum lifter experiments).
Negative energy is mainly electrostatic in nature, already in parallel. When a Tesla tower is charged, then that energy field conducts a magnet through the air as a long lightning discharge. The goal of di-electric gravity in a vacuum is to harness the electrostatic force, which is why asymmetrical capacitors have more success than lifters in a vacuum.
In lifters, positive energy runs to ground in a negative polarity (the ground is positive charge but negative energy, and is electrostatic in nature). The force of electrical grounding is the direction the electricity is travelling in general, and a lifter is designed to form a static field regardless. Tesla energy uses a concept of "radiant rise," which is the uplifting of static energy away from the ground, depending upon polarity (for example if you touch a Vander Graff generator, your hair on your head will stand straight up).
Tesla energy (negative energy) can harness a polarity as long as it is separated between two plates or points, or over a span of distance; polarity will form, along with a direction of electrical motion. The same thing happens with radiant electrostatic energy, naturally forming a polarity even though it is innately non-polarized. Polarity is due to the magnet mostly. In electrostatic energy, polarity is due to position and the abundance of relative charge at one position compared to the other.
Everyone who has posted any kind of video showing electrogravity in a vacuum has always used positive energy electromagnetic current.
Negative energy is unique in that it is not self-defeating, nor self-resisting, and instead of driving the positive electrical force to the ground, it uplifts a negative electrostatic force upward to the air, toward it's positive polarity (which is determined by the shape and charge of its environment just as much as the shape of it's own form).
Huge difference, but will it work in a vacuum?
The answer to that question is yes. Space itself is a conductive space, otherwise plasma couldn't conduct. Also, space is high frequency, otherwise plasma could not conduct as such. If you want higher frequency, just pump a vacuum.
The space inside a container conducts a charge gravitationally, too. When negative energy is used, there develops a natural lift away from gravity because the mass of the energy itself is much less. Therefore the inertia of the energy itself is much less. Yes, energy itself has these aspects, whereas energy-mass is determined mainly through a magnetic aspect of its field. So negative energy is much easier to move around, conduct wirelessly, and transmit wirelessly, just by itself without having to build a transmission power box. I've wirelessly conducted a AA battery before through scalar space, so as long as there was an energy field present to conduct it, with only a few basic coils sitting on the Earth.
If you run a positive wire on the left edge of a plate, and a positive wire on the right edge of a plate, then the plate is going to be a positive charge, and you'll find out if you touch the plate and the electricity runs to ground through you. ... Using negative energy, it is the same, but it won't run to ground, it will conduct out the top of your head. Tesla put on some shows demonstrating this as he stood on a conductive platform charged with a million volts, but was at a very high frequency negative energy.
On the Tesla/Free Energy page, you'll see pictures and video of plasma rings and arcs and fields.
There's just not many videos I have found on this topic. But there are a couple I'd like to share which does show motion of asymmetrical di-electric capacitors in a vacuum.
Plasma is a high frequency electrostatic. The frequency of an electrostatic field is raised through the presense of a magnetic field. Winding Tesla coils around long cylinder-shaped hollow magnets would develop a much higher frequency, just like how an AM radio antenna works.
Ceramic hull plates can develop a magnetic aspect (or neodymium hull plates for that matter).
Separating a magnetic quality and an electrostatic quality is not difficult, and is what the lightning discharges from a Tesla tower is -- it is the separating of the two energies, and the conducting of magnetic frequency through an electrostatic energy field medium (kinda like an electrical tornado in a storm of energy).
When a system loses its mass, the electrical force alone is propulsive, and it polarizes the inertial mass of energy itself. People can get knocked backwards from a high volt plasma discharge and end up unconscious on the other side of a room, like from touching an electric box. Plasma has a force that moves mass. A friend ramed into an electrical box with a long metal pipe once and was thrown backwards more feet than he could leap back with his own feet. People have been thrown backwards 20 feet from touching a high volt energy, and thrown to the other side of the room from sitting cross-legged on the floor and touching 3 phase electricity.
When a material is charged opposite to the charge of a bottom piece of material, then one material will tend to want to move toward the other material. The material goes along for the ride as the energy moves it.
When you consider that if you squeeze a slippery bar of soap or a pumpkin seed, it shoots out between your fingers, think of what energy will do to that shape if applied similarly. Certainly shape matters. Wedge-shaped vehicles also creates a different energy potential at the narrow end versus the wide end, much like how the EM drive works, or cones or utrons. Energy can pull or push, squeeze or expand.
If you want an uneven or asymmetrical lift, charge two plates to where they are both like charges in between, with an air space, and give one plate less charge than the other, so one plate pushes against the other a little harder. Regardless, asymmetrical capacitor tests in a vacuum do work due to the geometry of the energy which harnesses a specific type moreso than another. Also positive or negative energy makes a huge difference.
In conventional warp drive theory, such as that which EAGLEWORKS uses, negative energy is used to contract scalar space on the leading edge, while positive energy expands space on the trailing edge, giving the craft lift just like an airplane wing, but using di-electricostatic scalar "pressure" instead.
Townsend Brown would say to put the positive on top and the negative on the bottom. That way, the positive energy has a negative ground, in every sense of the word, straight to the quantum vacuum.
There is a circulation field involved.
Tesla would apply vacuum pressure through the aether (quantum vacuum in modern terms), and put the positive energy on the bottom and to the edges. The antenna on the OTC-X1 craft receives energy/frequency, drawing it into the central accumulator. Energy can be received from the outer perimeter of rotating collapsing electromagnets to be folded within through the ship giving it lift, too.
EAGLEWORKS warp drive theory is nothing more than di-electrostatic / di-electric propulsion in a vacuum. It is the bridge technology to the rest of the universe. Quite a huge step in the world.
This is why the headlines all read "the warp drive works," is because the EM drive, warp drive, and di-electrostatic propulsion is the same thing. It's not even really used in different ways. It's all used basically the same way. The EM drive works! That's in the headlines, known across the world.
When dealing with physics and theory, the energy is going to do what you want it to do much more than making the generator to do it for you, if that makes sense. It is a creative process, not a mathematical process. It's also experimental as a process. You may have to adjust this or change that to do what you want to with a machine. Just as long as you know what you're doing and have a good understanding of what you're working with, then you can do anything.
So ... there's a bit more going on with di-electrostatic propulsion than just involving your simple lifter. Keep that in mind; otherwise, it's achievable. You do need a conductive hull in space for many reasons, including electrical shielding, and correlating internal forces with external forces. Don't forget that coil systems can surround conductive hull plates to penetrate into the hull, but still be air-tight.
This di-electric / di-electrostatic hull system also can provide conduction between engine systems, brought up to high frequency from exposure to a vacuum (the vacuum of space).
RECAP:
There's a whole LOT of knowledge here at this website, very condensed knowledge too. For example, one of the purposes of using two induction coils is to only harness the spark collapse in parallel, and to isolate positive and negative energies. That simple concept is related here, but more advanced engineering techniques to harness it are not. Snap reversals generally harness high volt positive energy (but, not only displaces negative energy, but also allowing negative energy to travel through a positive energy medium; it's not quite exotic, but at least if you understand the nature of the energy, you can understand the rest). Spark collapses harness high voltage negative energy (why you need two coil systems instead of just one). Your experimental apparatus, engines, devices, can be built based on these physics. It's the physics which is what's important in this case, because from the physics, inventions can flourish.
Briefly, a snap reversal is when the electromagnetic field in a coil is quickly reversed that forces the field into a high volt compression to create a spark. It's a positive force of compression. Some induction coils behave that way, forcing a snap reversal prior to a collapse of the field, so the action goes like: charge, snap (spark) reverse, spark collapse, charge, snap reverse, spark collapse, and so you get alternating positive and negative energy in a spark gap.
(This bit about snap reversals and whatnot should be in the "induction coil" section .. but I just tend to scatter all this info around, not intentionally to make it difficult to comprehend and to absorb but .. it tends to have that effect. That is my way of compartmentalization; which absolutely does safeguard this information by making it difficult to quickly assimilate. From time-to-time I'll update sections also and not tell anyone. I discuss snap reversals on the Construction blog page regarding the OTC-X1 (and on a few other pages, too); but, that was before negative energy was better understood on the Tesla/Free Energy page. Sorry about that. I haven't checked to see if it will change how the OTC-X1 is to be wired after it is understood now, how the outer OTC-X1 transformer ring creates negative energy. I think just about everything that needs to be known has been discovered, at this point, with the exception of a few things like the di-electrostatic propulsion aspect, which is still a little bit in the theoretical range, but serves multiple functions regardless and really truly is an important feature of the ship because it does serve important functions that ARE known.)
However as said above, Eagleworks warp drive concept uses two rings around a ship which compresses space in front and expands space behind. Alternating the spark in positive/negative energy cycle can send only negative energy to one ring, and positive to the other.
I'm not necessarily saying this is the "right" way to do it, but just that it can be done. You are required to do your own experimentation, but you are required to know what can be done, otherwise you'll just be floundering lost in the woods for 20 years, which may still be the case in spite of all this information. And I'm not saying you're necessarily required to know this stuff, but only in that if you want to know, doing your own experimentation is a requirement for knowing. A basic rotating distributor system works well to time the collapses and reversals and whatnot, making connections on a 360 degree rotation. Simply using coils and a magnet can rotate your system, where electrical connections made by contact via roller bearing or brushes time the system where and when you want it. That is a simple common understanding, however; and we've had that knowledge on Earth in the public as long as we've had automobile distributors. That too, is discussed on the Construction blog page, the Outer Ring page, and other pages, and repeated over and over. Some of you get gung ho and read and re-read and want to get straight to work, but have failed to understand basic principles of induction coils and rotating distributor systems, electromagnetic compression and collapse. I am fully confident that in spite of this information, people are still very clueless. I've been on my own learning curve, too. It's difficult to see the history of what came first and what comes last, unless you pay attention to all the time stamps (which do get updated without updating the time stamps, like if it's a little brief but important mention).
Some of the information on this website is way beyond any hope of updating, but I feel that if we have to learn Newtonian physics before Einsteinean physics before Tesla physics, then the reader happily deserves the benefit of the older material as well as the newer sections, to build upon one's knowing. Eventually, the compartmentalization will be lifted a lot and put into a book, I'm hoping, for a permanent record at the very least just so one can reincarnate and still have the information available (maybe a little humorously put; disclaimer*).
People are very diverse, though. If any part of this really catches your eye and turns the light bulb on, then that is time for celebration.
. . .
Whistleblower testimonies can be very inspiring and helpful. Some talk about seeing ships out in the solar system that tend to glow with a plasma luminescence, some glowing brightly and some glowing dimly. There are some engine systems that use a di-electric asymmetrical plate stack incorporated into a hull shape but stacked from bottom to top. ... With an understanding of positive and negative scalar energy, I think it leads to a breakthrough in understanding these types of di-electric and di-electrostatic propulsion. ...
Tesla noticed a positive energy compression force of electromagnetic current acting upon the radiant electrostatic energy present in power lines when the lines were initially energized with DC, when he was working for Edison, whereas it took time for the current to reach the substation. Prior to reaching the substation, the compression force of electromagnetic current was so strong that blue parallel and horizontal electric lines of di-electric energy formed on the powerlines and the substation lit up with artificial lightning. But the collapse of electromagnetic fields was nearly instantaneous, travelling superconductively at light speed (negative scalar energy).
The thing is, the blue horizontal di-electrostatic lines were present long before the electromagnetic current reached the electrical substation. That demonstrates that parallel energy travels so much faster, where at one end of the powerline, the other end is energized instantly, not with positive electromagnetic current but with di-electrostatic current! Whereas the transverse electromagnetic wave was still en route to the destination.
Harnessing that speed force is the goal of di-electrostatic drive engines. On one hand, positive compression creates that speed force, and on the other hand, negative collapse creates that speed force. So like electromagnetic breathing, negative energy di-electrostatic can be generated from a "beating electromagnetic heart" like the central accumulator.
That is achieved through the negative energy transformer action at the outer peripheral of the OTC-X1. Since the powerlines accumulated Earth radiant negative electrostatic energy, then there are two ways to move that energy without displacing that energy in a one-time shot. Electromagnetic collapse is negative energy, however snap reversals (positive compression) can move negative energy, or drive negative magneto-electrostatic energy.
Since negative energy is harnessed di-electrically in parallel to electromagnetic north and south collapse and snap reversal therefore, then we can generate negative energy in a portable engine for a di-electrostatic electrogravity warp drive.
Keep in mind that when the OTC-X1 transformers are snap-reversed, it would tend to move the central rotating di-electric disk in the opposite direction; so the snap reversal should occur over the utrons, OR the electromagnetic collapse for that matter. I would surmise that an electromagnetic collapse can occur over the di-electric plates, and a snap reversal over the utrons. But, since there are 12 electromagnets, an AC configuration is possible. That is to say, 1/2 of the electromagnets can be collapsed while the other 1/2 can be energized. A snap reversal preceeds a collapse in the most logical "engine-firing" order. So, there is an engine timing involved with the OTC-X1. A snap-reversal and collapse can occur directly over the utrons which harness the diagonal of the transverse / parallel intersection. A collapse and re-energization would occur over the di-electric plates.
The di-electric plates would receive a collapse; between the plate and utron the coil for that segment re-energizes; over the utron it is snap-reversed and collapsed; the coil is re-energized when it comes onto the next di-electric plate in series, and the cycle continues. In fact, over the di-electric plates, they are wide enough to accomodate a charge and collapse, and another charge and collapse.
However, as seen in the negative energy generator on the Tesla/Free Energy page, which uses plates between two coils, coil one is collapsed and coil two is energized partially also from the previous coil's collapse, so the energy cycles and perpetuates.
Since the utrons are at a diagonal between transverse and parallel, then it is designed to harness the Alternating Current, not of polarity, but of scalar positive and negative energy itself!
The Outer Ring is based on the OTC-X1 transformation techniques, and based on the primary purpose to generate negative energy. All these mechanisms and techniques are congruent, and co-relate.
The impeller, which mimicks a spinning electromagnetic current run along a wire, yet also involves parallel di-electrostatic transmission, shows the inertia of energy in both transverse and parallel, but also at a diagonal to those vectors.
Also because of the nature of di-electric and di-electrostatic energy in asymmetrical capacitors to be able to move in one direction in a vacuum, according to its polarity, it can be seen the harnessing of gravity itself through electrical propulsion -- demonstrating the inertia of charge, itself; that charge does indeed have inertia, and inertia is the basis of gravity.
Another type of electrogravity impeller can involve diagonal curved plates on an outside edge of a large ring style segment, but hollow in the center, whereas the curved plates point in toward the center, and are affixed to a sturdy ring-frame. Also, the curved plates are pronounced at a near 45 degrees, but are curved in a true impeller fashion. This engine design is not covered in the LAU-X engine style, but uses the principles of an asymmetrical electrogravity impeller. Once these basic engines and energy systems are better understood, more exotic and yet simplistic engines can develop.
. . .
Aspects involved in the OTC-X1: electrogravity cancellation of centrifugal forces, and the right-angled cancellation of gravity forces di-electrically (magneto-electrostatic gravity cancellation). Note: right-angled gravity cancellation speeding up time is supported by an observation of GPS geo-stationary (geo-synchronous) satellites in faster time frequency.
Secondary effects: speeds up time. Thought Pilotable: yes
Aspects involved in the Outer Ring: negative energy field generation and di-electrostatic propulsion and maneuvering; Tesla exotic generator
Secondary effects: Exotic superconductive matter/light unification.
Aspects involved in the Vertical Core / Impeller: increased negative energy frequency of gravity-time; electrogravity acceleration
Aspects involved in the Hull: di-electrostatic propulsion and maneuvering; frequency acceleration in a vacuum; superconductive negative energy warp field generation. The hull dynamics include the inner hull, outer hull, and the air space between the two hulls. Secondary EM drive thrusters also can be embedded in places to effect maneuvering. Also, di-electric electrogravity engines similar to asymmetrical capacitors, as a hybrid of Townsend Brown's original invention can also be used, and was achieved before the EM thruster came along. Townsend Brown did it back in the 1930's. That is discussed on the Tesla/Free energy page in the Tesla power article involving the electromagnetic collapse, generating negative energy di-electrostatic in a plate stack for simple electrogravity not just in an atmosphere, but it can be used in a vacuum in an air-tight housing.
Tertiary effects: particle shielding
If the LAU-X class ship were a musical instrument, it would vibrate at such a frequency that it could move throughout the star system, and to other star systems and back.
Thought Piloting is also an aspect of maneuvering and directional force - providing a conscious element to the generated fields of light and sound.
All of these engine systems induce the negative energy warp field for light speed and faster-than-light travel. It is possible also for hyperdrive travel and jump drive [teleportation] as these engines co-relate exotically.
. . .
The only way to tell the story is through the physics, because all possible engineering and invention follows from the physics. I am very pleased that so many have come forward to help and to contribute, and am honored to be included in the circles of some very brilliant genius people, like my mentor (who did make a comment below).
I am still reeling with just the sheer amount of information which literally changes our entire understanding of energy as we know it. Now, the REAL learning curve can begin. Play!
> complete <
Breakthrough!
I was told I could use my Tesla tower to charge a car battery by connecting the system (or an antenna) to the positive terminal of the battery, and connecting the negative terminal of the battery to ground. In fact, people are already doing this I found out, from some online research.
They are actually getting a spark-response from antennas, because they are using steel components. Using aluminum and copper wire and antennas, the material is non-ferrous, and unable to resonate with a magnetic aspect, and unable to spontaneously generate a spark response. But by using steel wire and antenna components, then the material can naturally polarize with an electromagnetic aspect, and "spark-off" very easily, due to the magnetic aspect involved.
Using aluminum and copper components, the energy is non-polarized with a magnetic aspect, so it requires diodes. But by using steel components, no diodes are required to polarize the antenna electromagnetically. The antenna will still be polarized electrostatically, but only by using steel or ferrous material will it polarize electromagnetically (actually, magneto-electrostatically).
In fact, a Tesla tower using steel material instead of aluminum or copper will start generating electromagnetic current usable for motors and standard electricity (free energy) because it will resonate electromagnetically instead of radiant-electrostatically!
So. All those electrostatic (electrogravity) lifters out there using aluminum foil, need to switch over to something like thin steel flashing, instead (and sand off that insulative coating crap so that it's bare metal). That will give it a magnetic response. A unified field deals with electromagnetism. If you eliminate the magnetic aspect, it's not a unified field. Gravity responds to electromagnetism, and is an aspect of electromagnetism. Electromagnetic inertia is the whole aspect of electrogravity. Tin-foil non-ferrous lifters will not respond in a vacuum, but steel flashing can!
As mentioned above also, most lifters are vertically oriented, instead of curved shapes. Most of the youtube videos of di-electric propulsion in a vacuum don't work because they are using non-ferrous material.
Let this sink in!
Steel Utrons instead of aluminum or copper? (wait for it ..)
Steel Central Accumulator!
That's why these tests haven't been working even though the physics says they should! It's because people are not generating a magnetic response, or rather a magnetic resonance with the non-ferrous material they are using!
If you are going to use standard magnet wire, wind your coils around a steel pipe, or a steel core, or have a long bar magnet inside the coil winding, so it will resonate magnetically, naturally! But you'll need to take extra care, and be safety minded!
And by the way, read the "Magnetic Resonance Breakthrough" article on the Updates and Design Improvements page for the style of utron best used.
Additional:
See the Construction page (not the construction blog page, but the other one) for results of Townsend Brown di-electric propulsion in a vacuum. Yes. That style of electrogravity propulsion does indeed work in a vacuum, and so the hull plating aspect for electrogravity maneuvering and propulsion is confirmed. Just scroll down to the words in bold font: "Townsend Brown."
The hull plating layered ceramic (magnetic conductor) / dielectric conductor has been verified; See: Construction page. A magnetic aspect must be included with a di-electric aspect for performance of a di-electrostatic propulsion system in a vacuum. This very much stands to reason, keeping with the conventional electrogravity theory of rotating magnetic fields over an alignment of electric spin (like Dr. Ning Li's gravity device), but by using magneto-di-electrostatic fields instead of rotational magnetic fields.
RSS Feed