The moon is a big part of our planetary reality.

It gives us another point of reference.  Now we have the Earth and the moon which is part of the Earth system, and we have space that is between two points of reference.  Space exists.

Lasers have been reflected off the moon, at the speed of light.  The time was measured for the laser pulse to return, and that accurately determines distance from the Earth to the moon, with super precision.

It is roughly 220,000 miles away last time I checked.  That puts it outside the Van Allen belts -- the radiation belts of Earth, and some people consider that as part of a "dome-system," according to the most informed flat Earthers, I mean Flat Earth RESEARCHERS .....    who also stand in agreement (largely due to the post "Logic is Truth," just below the next article titled, "The Game") that we are told by NASA that we can only travel in near-Earth orbits because any higher and we would be microwaved or nuked by the radiation of the Van Allen Belts.

​So then, how did we get to the moon?


. . .


What are we not being told?  What is being hidden from us?  And why are they saying we can't leave?

So this is our second point of reference in our Planetary Reality.





            NEW INFORMATION         -------        Updated article 8/22/2017




​
Wow! Ancient aliens tonight was AWESOME!!! It talked about the evidence we gathered that the moon is hollow, and that ancient records show times when we did not have a moon at all.

The Sumerian hall of records discuss placing the moon in orbit. The hall of records is at least as old as 6,000 B.C.  Zulu legend talks about them taking the egg of a dragon and rolling it across the sky which became the moon (Draco reference). Also records as recent as 500 B.C. also discuss the time in relatively recent history before the moon. It begs the question did the moon cause the great flood worldwide when it was moved into orbit around 12,500 B.C.?

Also the show talked about ancient particle beam weapons in Russia that the native indians there have seen these devices in operation to defend the Human descendants of the ancient winners of the great ET wars. In fact, more than a few times there have been footage of these weapons in action, and once a spy aircraft we sent to Russia was shot down by particle beam weapons.

A lot of evidence and research-based science was put into all of this.

So is the moon a currently active spaceship? Apollo footage shows energy beams, lights, flashes and mist and tall monuments and obelisks ... also found by probes doing fly-bys.  Equipment was crashed into the moon after Apollo left measuring instruments that transmit data back to Earth.  So, the equipment purposefully crashed into the moon sent back information that showed the moon to ring like a bell, only accomplishable if the moon were a hollow metallic sphere.

​
.... No other planet has Van Allen belts other than Earth, also .. more ancient defense technology.


These are not new "theories" either. The Apollo lander equipment was crashed into the moon near seismic equipment we put there and recorded the moon ringing like a bell for 3 hours.

It is presumed the moon is a coated hollow metal sphere, with ET and us there currently.

Disclosure is happening!   Now the truth about the secret space program and how we have bases in almost every planet and moon and even some asteroids (some asteroids have large interiors with huge arched doorways, and tables and chairs set to accommodate VERY tall beings.  I have had dreams about that long before I had heard that news) ... and the truth about Mars having an atmosphere, and the moon being breathable to an extent, and how the people on Mars and the ones serving in the secret slave space program are lied to about Earth, abducted from Earth and taken to Mars to be used as slaves ...   a lot of the whistleblowers coming forward these days also discuss that.

​
Bases on the moon have been reported by Richard C. Hoagland, former director of NASA, and many photos released of domes, cigar-shaped craft, weird other stuff, and interesting structures captured in the reflection of the face plates of the astronauts on the moon, as well.  There's a lot of information coming out about all of this; it pays to do your research.

In fact, one of the things Richard C. Hoagland pointed out long ago, was that there is a little bit of an atmosphere on the moon, otherwise the moon dust would be hard-packed in a vacuum.  Also, you can see the glow around the outline of the moon during partial illumination phases, showing a reflection of light through an atmosphere, a VERY thin atmosphere, but there's something at least. 

​

To get to the moon, we avoided the inner radiation belts and shot around the outer radiation belts. We did nuke the Van Allen belts too it has been revealed .. but it luckily didn't explode in the right place to damage the belts or add more radiation.



So ..  when you look up at the moon, at the ET sphere placed in orbit around Earth, with all the startling features and monuments and buildings and constructions on the surface (with far more of an infrastructure under the surface), maybe you will think about it a little bit differently than you have before ...    I have a feeling this article will be updated again. ...

. . .
​

As Promised, a new update!


I can appreciate the not knowing. When one really gets into the research of the flat/ball Earth, it is amazing what we find out we just take for granted, ... and what we really learn about things we never realized, no matter what side you pick. The geometry is of particular interest. 

Many FE folks deny gravity, the existence of everyone in the southern hemisphere who observes reality differently than what would actually work on a flat Earth... but the flat earth model otherwise is like a cosmic clock of universal proportions ... There's no coincidence about any of it which is why God or gods are involved in the entire search for answers.

The Bible actually has reference that the moon is a recent addition to the sky. Ancient tribal histories say they brought the moon .. asked for it .. and a dragon came and laid an egg in the sky which is the moon. 

Also historical ancient reference talk about the time before the moon.

The precision of Earth's gravity lens, and the position and momentum of the moon and sun are dimensions of action that coincide in 2 and 3 and 4 dimensions (4th adds the component of time to space, which light measures; light is assumed 5D), in several ways interchangeably flat or ball shaped.

It is hypothesized that the moon was placed into orbit using triangular/cone-shaped engine-objects near the center of the moon, detected by Apollo missions and seismic sonar survey.  The ancient reptilian gods perhaps?



So, there are some peculiar aspects about the moon that enables it as a point of reference within our planetary reality system.



There are also many people watching the moon in their telescopes and taking videos of fleets of ships flying out of bases in the moon, and even ships flying into the sun and using it as a stargate because of how the sun's magnetic field is dialed in with the ships' approach, and then solar flares eject in line with routes between other stars.  I've seen videos of objects hovering around near the sun that looked like they exploded.

I'm not inclined to include a "star system news" section though..   just a planetary news page is fine.  It is actually assumed that people have done their own research into the secret space programs if they are viewing this site...  (Although as a recent update to this, the exo-archaeoastronomy page is all about that: "exo ...")


​

Angular geometry:                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                                           (8/20/17)
​
​The path of the upcoming solar eclipse tomorrow is interesting. I'd love a good flat earth clock-style map which we can look at to see how the sun and moon move but I know that's too much to ask for. The geometry is complex and we got gravity and atmospheric lensing to deal with on a ball Earth. Straight line of sight distances are never freakin straight so a good real time computer model would be a great tool.

You'd think when the sun and moon are both out during the day, the lit side of the moon points to the sun. Well it does mostly, but during the arc of the sun and moon's progression, there's a refraction angle that changes due to gravity and the arch of the atmosphere (like a dome) that both bend light.  So the lit side of the moon doesn't point straight at the sun... it can be off by 5 - 15 degrees depending on position and angle and other factors.  I've noticed after the sun sets, the lit side of the moon tends to point directly at where the sun is ...

​No one talks about that tho .. flat or ball Earthers alike.  It honestly stumps both camps. Lol

I would love to see a group such as NASA make a video showing how the Earth and moon move relative to the sun, and how we see it on the surface of Earth versus from orbit or at a distance away from Earth and the moon, so we can see how all this happens.


​


​


​

Bottom line with the flat Earth fallacies ... not necessarily the argument, just the fallacies ... silence is agreement; and if it's not logical or true, and an argument is defeated in reason without insult, then any continued "perpetration" (perpetuating the narrative) is only a game played to e-motion, and is merely a battle of will, not truth.

If it is truth, it is logical, otherwise it's a game (maybe a contest, if not literally "fooling" around).  To win the game, you defeat it in logic and move on. Otherwise choosing a side merely may result in choosing to play the game. It's a game because the flat Earth model is not the logical truth.  OF COURSE the flat Earthers know this because humans are capable of logic and reason.  They just pretend to believe because when the truth is logically demonstrated, then the truth is known, and then the game is over. Period. They LIKE the game.

To them, claiming to speak true but not speaking true IS the game. Otherwise they would be rational in discernment. When they get bored with playing the game, they go away, but later initiate a new one because it's a fun game to lie and pretend it's the truth, because that's what the elites and tyrants have done to us, causing extinction level damage to the planet (like Fukashima), so why can't they do it, too? After all we're all screwed (maybe to their minds).

Flat Earth is a game.  Otherwise the debate would be over fairly quickly especially nowadays after everyone has studied their arguments and found the solutions.




​

This post addresses the flat Earth claims that gravity does not exist, and that space does not exist.


Another logical fallacy ...  the force of down was named "gravity" by Newton 300 years ago. To claim that the force of down does not exist, and that it's just a theory is not even anything that can be argued.  It's a logical fallacy. You can't argue against common sense.  It's like saying light or sound does not exist.

Furthermore, Flat Earthers use science. They have corrected me several times. They know how far the atmosphere extends up. They know what the troposphere is. The flat Earth map places the sun at 3,000 miles up. That is 15 million feet up. That is well outside the atmosphere, in space. Space therefore exists BECAUSE the sun exists.  No claim that space cannot exist can be made, because that is not a claim, it is a logical fallacy, an error in logical reasoning.

...

I've told flat earthers before that I don't have a problem with a flat Earth notion AT ALL.  But to examine it logically to be clear with what is real and what is fabricated, you have to treat it respectfully as a logical argument to be clear with the truth of reality. That means illogical fallacies cannot be used as a claim, since it is not even an argument.  It's not even common sense.

If anyone is going to tell me that the force of down does not exist, and it's just a theory, that one day someone will somehow jump up and keep on going until they hit the dome, then that is a logical fallacy, something that cannot exist in reality.

That is why people think Flat Earthers are nuts.

​
The force of down therefore must exist. Space also therefore must exist, no matter WHAT map you use, or notion of the shape of the world you have.

The force of down is named "gravity."  It was not a "discovery" because everyone already knew about it. The force of down is not a theory again, because it is commonly known as true. The name of the force of down is called "gravity." Since down exists, and it has a name of "gravity," as that force of down, then gravity exists as the force of down.

Is this logical?  Yes or No.  Everyone who desires to comment must be respectful and honorable on this post, or your comments will be deleted.


SHARE THIS.

Even though this is super-complicated, it is super-simplified.  



Once again:  The biggest issue has been the mainstream narrative that Newton "discovered" gravity which is not true, because to put it in those words imply that gravity was un-noticed before! But that's not true either because it is a common root reality that everyone has ALWAYS known, that you drop things and they fall, and if you jump up, you don't keep going up. Newton only NAMED that force of down "gravity" which is a common word used universally with everyone to know what each other is talking about.

If you want to call it ickyickypitang instead of gravity, no one knows what you are talking about. And applying it in conversation means you can't relate with others and only serve to separate yourself out from being able to normally relate with another Human being.

If you want to be a fringe outcast, go ahead. But don't claim that you know the truth, or are a "truther" or that you profess the truth, because the truth is that which cannot be denied and is universally recognizable to all, otherwise it wouldn't be the Truth.

​
​So don't be stupid and outrageously deny that there is no force of "down."  That force was given a name 300 years ago.


​


...  Also ...



Furthermore, the Flat Earth model does not support the existence of the lunar eclipse.  According to the flat earth society, the lunar eclipse is due to a mysterious and unknown "shadow object" that must pass in front of the moon to block our view, but it remains invisible and thus allowing light to pass through it at all other times. It has no mass, is undetectable, and frankly does not exist.  Also, the lunar eclipse cannot be predicted by flat earth models, but the standard model can make accurate predictions well into the future and into the past (on the order of magnitude of thousands if not tens of thousands of years into the future and past, is how accurate the standard model is).

​See the comments below referencing Antarctica.



​




​