I want to mention a few things about a gravity lens. Not only is light attracted to the source of gravity, or otherwise flattening a curve, but it also bends light around a massive body like a star. Mercury is seen before it emerges from behind the sun. The light we see from Mercury, lit up by the sun, it bends around from behind the sun, so that Mercury appears beside the sun before it has emerged out from behind the sun.

So since light has no mass and it is not attracted by mass, thus not having anything for gravity to take hold of, then it is the space itself that is bent, in layers of inertial density, or gravitational density.  That is the radiant field of mass. Mass is electromagnetic. Gravity is therefore electromagnetic (magneto-electrostatic). 

The space is warped around the star in a field of inertial mass density. In other words, gravity has a pushing effect away from itself, simultaneous to a pulling effect toward itself. Gravity is the force that relates to this, because through gravity, the forces of density can be worked with. 

Other aspects of Gravity lensing is the decreasing of distance by shortening the frequency (time) of space (Negative Gravitation) ...  or increasing the distance by adding more space (higher frequency of space) in between the moments of each second, as we observe naturally.

Machines and experiments have tested Special Relativity so that we understand the above to be true not according to Special Relativity, but easily explained by the Laws of the Universe which are spelled out in the form of the discipline of physics called "Special Relativity."

Gravity has a push, and it has a pull:

Bending light around an object, or bending light toward an object.

Galaxies are held in equilibrium.  Space is created in the midpoint between galaxies, as attraction toward the gravity of the galaxies; and space will move to the galaxy to the left, or to the right. At the zero midpoint, it is both and neither. 

Also space is created through the gravity field of mass. There is positive, and negative. From Light, all matter is created.






The Gravity Lens of Earth:

Gravity bends light around the curve of Earth slightly, so that a line of sight path is bent around a curved surface, as evident with the post and video below referencing Earth's gravity lens.  


How does this apply to a "Flat Earth?"  Read on, down the page ...


​
​

What the heck is the "Flat Earth" all about? What's going on, what IS the "Flatte Earth?"



Long bridges over the ocean, some 10 miles long, some 20 miles long, if you were to throw a laser level on a bridge, it would appear perfectly level clear to the horizon. Many people are noticing this phenomenon of the "flat earth" but are taking it to an extreme.  (Bridges over 20 mile stretches of ocean from island to island may disappear out of sight like looking across an infinity-edge pool, but those bridges are built while taking the curve of Earth's surface under consideration, EVEN THOUGH a laser level shows it to be straight and flat. What's the deal?) 

Earth's gravity bends the line of sight around the curve of the Earth so that it appears flat. The long bridges over ocean between islands for example, they may appear perfectly level, but they are actually built and MUST be built with taking the curvature of Earth's surface under consideration; the bridges are built, calculated to match the curve of Earth's surface, regardless if line-of-sight is level or not.

The horizon is level for so many miles before suddenly dropping off the "edge."  THE HORIZON RISES TO EYE-LEVEL. You can see the distant horizon of the ocean at eye-level, and ships will sail out and then suddenly disappear over the edge. In some cases, like in Hawaii, the horizon of the ocean is OVER eye-level. People claim the Earth is flat. But, there is something else going on.

Eclipses too have this peculiarity.  When the Earth is between the sun and the moon, during a lunar eclipse where the sun and moon are at the horizon, it has been observed that the sun on one side of the horizon and the moon on the other, are slightly above the level horizon-line. There is a gravity-warped level plane to contend with, where the sun and moon are above a flat and level distance of line-of-sight.

Let me explain this: If the horizon is at eye-level for so many miles, over a considerable distance, then the sun and moon appear over the horizon line during a lunar eclipse. Why does this happen when the sun and moon should be on opposite sides of the planet Earth, and how are we magically able to see around the curve of Earth to see the sun and moon during lunar eclipse, and how are we able to see a supposedly curved surface of Earth instead actually measuring to be flat and level?

The answer to this question is:  Earth has a gravity lens.



Gravity Lens:

A gravity lens is detected when during a solar eclipse, the constellation patterns are distorted around the sun. During the eclipse, the stars can be seen because the light from the sun is eclipsed. Stars that should be behind the sun are off to the side; stars that are just off to the side of the sun appear more out to the side of the sun.

Mercury also when it disappears around behind the sun, appears sooner than it should around from behind the sun because of the sun's gravity lens bending the light around the sun. We therefore see the light from Mercury while Mercury is still behind the sun.

Gravity lenses are able to magnify distant galaxies. It's common practice that Astronomers wait for a distant galaxy to line up or be very close to a star, so that the star's gravity will actually magnify the distant galaxy so astronomers can get a better and closer look.

The Earth's gravity lens acts in the same way, bending light around the curve of Earth so the light we see actually looks straight and level, however as said at the top, bridges built over long distances of flat ocean must be built with the curvature of Earth calculated in to the bridge construction.


This is what's known as "The Flat Earth."

The horizon of Earth rises to eye-level even at a considerable height over the surface of Earth. 

There are many videos and photos and experiments done by people to prove and measure this. The famous experiments have been conducted with weather balloon tests which send a camera up around 25 miles in the air. The balloon falls to the ground later and the camera is recovered and it can be seen the horizon of Earth's surface rises to eye-level.

This phenomena of Earth's gravity lens has led many people to fanciful models of a flat Earth which just do not work in reality. An easy internet search will show the evidence, and there is a LOT of information about the flat Earth, but just a small percentage of it is actually true. 

This page examines in detail what is going on with the Earth, and why people believe the Earth is flat, when the Earth is in reality, a spherical shape. After all, even during the lunar eclipse, the Earth's curve can be seen eclipsing the moon, even if the sun and moon are above the level horizon-line.

In order to understand the true nature of the heliocentric model of Earth, the paradox of flat and round Earth must be unified to be solved. 

The problem is that the flat Earthers don't understand or believe in gravity, and the round Earthers don't understand the nature of Earth's gravity lens which actually DOES INDEED flatten the horizon we see while standing on Earth. The articles below this go into a lot of detail to illustrate and explain what's going on.

It's not some grand conspiracy to hide the truth, nor is it a grand deception, although it IS a grand illusion, albeit an optical one. When one understands gravity better, then one can speculate about how a different type of gravity lens can actually shorten the distance light can travel, much the same was as a photon takes both paths around a star. This entire website is dedicated to such a pursuit, of how to construct hyperdrive star ships (warp drive physics). This page is dedicated to "planetary relativity 101" so far.

When people are so lost as to not know the truth, and don't understand therefore don't believe in gravity or relativity, or frequency, then mainstream education has not done its job appropriately or correctly. It is ironic that the "Flat Earth" actually TOTALLY PROVES the existence of Gravity! 








​

I'm not satisfied with this page at all. It does not give me a warm happy glow. The gravity lens idea is pretty neat, as it explains why the sun can appear close behind the clouds instead of far. It attemps to answer some questions but I don't think answers all the 12.

I don't want to give too much information here, because I am not pushing a flat Earth model. Bottom line, round-earthers might not see the issues of question, and the flat-earthers will never see what explains their fallacy. It does answer questions tho, about the Earth, but there are too many idiots to appreciate this. For example, the Earth spins relatively slowly maybe lessening a harder pull of gravity (some gravity cancellation) through a mechanism of centrifugal force of Earth's spin (outward push at 90 degrees from the center), but that is a moot point ultimately because Earth's gravity is a unified field. People don't understand how gyroscopes set to spin level perpendicular to a pull of gravity will stay spinning perpendicular to a pull of gravity even when the airplane flies around the curve. They don't understand that every point on Earth can show on a level, and that a straight line can be a curved path. 

I don't mean to be rude, but people don't understand the world they live in, particularly those who resort to an illogical and disproven model of Earth to rebel against the knowledge people are given. Discernment must be learned and knowledge must be questioned, sure. But people aren't wise, and are scientifically illiterate. Not to call the kettle black, I had to learn too. But I never once resorted to a flat Earth model when the elements of the existing model just needed more clarity. For crying out loud, I'm not so lost that I can't tell the difference in what I perceive as my reality.

Not being able to tell the difference in what one perceives in reality is a psychotic tendency. Unfortunately normal people may have that problem.

The universe and Earth is truly amazing; unfortunately though, I've seen more NASA footage videos of zero-gravity activity with so many impossible little magical instances where there is gravity on only a floating ketchup bottle or drips of water and obvious wires when supposedly in zero-g than I care to remember, when the floodgates opened on me of conspiracy theory and hoaxes purported by whomever for reasons of any possible design ...  just pick a possible scenario and reason. The cabal did it. The illuminati. The evil aliens .... it doesn't matter. What matters is that you can distinguish your reality and tell the difference between truth and illusion.

Why is this page even important? It is important to teach about gravity. It's important to show you the difference. A new, unique thing about Earth has been discovered. But you have to be able to tell the difference to determine what has been discovered. If you are blind, you will miss it. This has not been an easy task.

This has unique meaning to everyone and anyone. For example, you may go away with an understanding of how a hyperdrive craft can hold a gravity field of inertia, say of Earth, and fly into space with artificial gravity due to how a gyroscope will hold its own frame of reference throughout inertial changes, throughout gravitational changes. Gravity is just inertia, inertial mass ... but there's much more to it, and for people to claim not to believe in gravity, it locks people out of understanding hyperdrive physics (warp drive physics).

I'm keeping with a common theme, the theme of this website. 

​Let's cut to the chase here. 

​

This page has turned into an examination of spherical and flat Earth models, which models work and which don't, and an understanding of how maps work. Also, it's turned into a proof of gravity page because so many do not even believe in the existence of gravity, which is absolutely ludicrous. 

People cannot understand hyperdrive physics without understanding gravity and light.

The truth is a bit of a paradox. The Earth exhibits both flat and round dimensions. The anomalies can only be explained via the existence of Earth's gravity lens. This page is for serious researchers only. It serves to debunk the Flatte Earth model in support of the Heliocentric model, but the Earth gravity lens serves to flatten out the line of sight around the curve of Earth so that it appears flat even from very high altitude.

However this page also examines the Earth as a hyperspace realm, not just a planet. 

In the process, this page also enlightens people and dispels the ignorance associated with gravity, relativity, inertia, all the important stuff.

It is my hope that this page can serve as a road map for when things get rough, or when people get lost in their attempts to understand reality.

​ 

There's one image in this video showing the view of the Earth from orbit supposedly from NASA, which shows something very odd.


This entire page is the illustrated Earth Paradox.

Where does it unify if both sides are equally valid in their existence?

This Grand Paradox is currently unsolvable, and exists in its most purest form.

A paradox is unifiable as its solution. In pure form, the paradox is unsolvable until it is unified.

​
​

If this were projected into a Flatte image, then when it is curved it could be seen that the shadows are all in parallel?  However it's starting out already with a curved surface and the shadows are around a common light source supposedly the sun, which looks as it is very close to the surface of Earth. If the shadows were in parallel on a Flat Earth surface, then when the Earth surface is curved the shadows would be radial. It is hard to say the shadows are in parallel if the surface is curved to distort the shape as-is in this photo which clearly shows the shadows on the surface of Earth to be radial to the light source -- the Sun!  So this is the question of the year ...  and is presented in the video concerning the 12 questions to Neil DeGrasse.  That video is well worth watching.  It is here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuBVCmC0ACM

It is very common to see images of the surface of the Earth that are actually flat. Let us suppose that the surface of the Earth from high altitude, the horizon line, remains level instead of curved. There are famous weather balloon videos made of the balloons going as high up as 22 miles with a video camera showing a flat horizon. Part of the Flat Earth model is the assumption that the sun is much closer to the Earth, instead of very huge and 92 million miles away. 

This NASA "photo" is very interesting, and so the Flatte Earth movement is taking off!  Could it be possible the land is extended to other planets and other Realms?  Perhaps by walking beyond the South Pole, we can travel through a portal to another Realm, another world?  If indeed there exists a type of "Time-Gate" as Dr. Ning Li predicted, and was confirmed by a Russian newspaper that is the South Pole (or facilitated through it), then could it be?  Could a tribe of Humanity walk through the South Pole, maybe even at certain times, and travel to a paradise world in a different star system or in a different Realm? What if the Land is interconnected to and through the stellar planes, to the common land all connected together throughout space?  But what is this photo above all about, and in particular in contrast to the information below in the other articles?

NASA has certainly been accused of doctoring images and using CGI; could this be one of those faked images?
​

Apparently and realistically, the sun is reflecting off the water, the clouds, off of Earth. However the shadows point to a common light source - the Sun!  

This is how the Earth looks from space.

The shadows are not in parallel after all this time, however they will seem so over small areas where a Human being can observe on the surface of Earth. Also, the sun is huge and 92 million miles away and the shadows are not in parallel. The sun is so bright it reflects off Earth's surface.
​

There is another photo of the same image where it is projected into a flat view however, which suggests some manipulation with the image, but no indication of any blame because it's part of the overall Paradox in general.

                                                                               .    .    .
​

What if we could just "walk beyond the south pole" and travel to an infinite number of other possible Realms?
​

Walking exactly in 90 degree to the North Pole leads to the South Pole, and is the only navigable course (actually it is 180 degrees away from magnetic north -- always with north directly behind).  It's funny. Beyond the South Pole, following the compass which points South, there would have to be a greater portion of Earth only accomplished and at the moment can describe a model only achieved by Flat Earth, so. On a Flat Earth map such as the above, walking beyond the South Pole is to explore the rest of the infinite plane of Earth.

Each north pole on each separate realm would point to its own, perhaps. That's really awesome. Common polar adjoinings to other Realms / Worlds ... with "sphere" placeholders so to speak, which also tends to locate planets to other worlds, in the cosmos. Each planet, is a type of Realm, able to be entered by walking "beyond the south pole." Perhaps, Parallel Earth realities accessible by frequencies and travel through a portal, where the same stars can be seen in the nighttime sky.

​
​Unfortunately, this is the "thinking man's" website, and one has to decide for him/herself if the above is a real image from NASA or not.  It is possible NASA is hiding the existence of hyperdrive technology by deterring the public's attention to a model of planetary and star-system physics unable to support travel through space. 

Conventionally, gravity is disbelieved as a real force, in Flatte Earth theory. 

​However, gravity is a real force, and we can harness it.

The Earth is a Hyperspace Realm. Hyperdrives are suitable vessels to unify the paradox of travel to the Realm-spaces of other worlds, their placement held by the representation of the sphere, or the planet, and able to interact with each other through space, even though the light of each star is as interconnected as One Cosmic Star.  ...   Secret esoteric knowledge reveals these things, . . .  about the nature of planetary portals and crossing through gates at special times of the seasons, with the Earth's orbital clock unlocking gate coordinates to other realms throughout the cosmos. . . .  But you need advanced knowledge for that, not simple primitive superstitious beliefs.
​

There is advanced knowledge regarding the flat earth .. especially maps and geometry. But without knowledge of celestial movement and orbital paths and gravity, one is too primitive to be able to unlock the planetary portals to travel to other worlds.

Some elite flat earth groups discuss this but .. the planetary gravity lens makes the flat Earth model beyond obsolete as far as the anomalies go.

​One cannot be in denial of what is obvious and apparent, and one must not overlook the subtle aspects of what one in ignorance is blind to see.

Keep that in mind as you read through this page, and understand the pure form of the paradox, and how it unifies if you REALLY want to know. 

​If they only know why the flat earth maps are so important, not the model ... If they understood real physics, then they could calculate portal travel to other worlds, through the south gate, in celestial alignment during seasons and days and eclipses and whatnot of the solar clock, connecting to other locations elsewhere... that requires an understanding also of wormhole travel, which requires gravity to be known.




"​ It's damn easy to prove the Earth is a sphere. And when you enter that sphere of reality .. the sphere of influence, you find flat land. That can seem to be a huge paradox, where the spheres we see in the sky are placeholders for actual realms."

​
That is a beautiful thing to consider, that an infinite plane also cycles and loops, that you can exit off the edge of the map to re-appear on the other side.  It may very well seem like teleporting.  






​

I'm really excited about this!  

Check this out ... This actually shows the Earth's gravity lens, bending the light from the sun and the moon.. The gravity lens has the effect of flattening the Earth sphere shape to a flat Earth shape, and the light of the moon that we should not be seeing (behind the curve) we actually ARE seeing!



Here is the video that shows it:

​
          (The title is a flat Earth proof, but it actually proves the Gravity Lens of a spherical world)

Do you see it in the video?  The sun and moon are on opposite sides of the Earth, but both are above the horizon and the eclipse still takes place. The Earth is supposed to be smack dab in between but there's an offset. (just turn the sound off if it helps)

The moon is eclipsing on the side facing up, prior to it actually being in between the Earth and the moon. Obviously it MUST be in between the Earth and the moon, though. 

What's going on, is that we are able to see around the curve of the Earth, much the same way as the sun's gravity lens works. During solar eclipses, we see a distorted star pattern, of the stars able to be seen from behind the sun, appearing off to the side. Mercury also can be seen coming out from behind the sun much earlier than it is supposed to because gravity bends the light so that objects behind the sun are visible.

Gravity is bending the light (line of sight) we see of the moon, which is actually behind the Earth, but we are seeing it off to the side of Earth.

The sun is rising and the moon is setting, but the moon moves very slowly from west to east as the sun moves more rapidly from east to west, that we see in the sky. The moon is slowly moving behind the Earth, as the Earth is spinning. The moon moves slightly slower than the sun, and that is because of the moon's orbit. The exact degrees of the moon's retarding motion is about a half a degree around a circle per hour.


​
There is evidence of gravity lensing in the video, but it looks like the sun is behind the horizon still and the moon slightly above the horizon, so it looks like the angle is correctly aligned until you get more toward the end of the video.  The guy narrating the video is being dyslexic.  Nonetheless if you still aren't satisfied that the Earth is really a sphere obeying the Heliocentric model, just read on to the article titled "Gravitation and Flat Earth Frames of Relativity."      ...    No flat Earth model supports or explains eclipses. A planetary gravity lens renders the flat Earth model not just obsolete, but totally beyond stupid; even though there is beautiful geometry of near Divine precision involved, you cannot appreciate it's beauty until you know the truth and embrace advanced knowledge.

People will claim that gravity does not exist. They will claim it is due to density.

Things fall to the ground if they are more dense correct? Density attracts density. Things fall to the ground. The helium balloon that rises because it is less dense than the air rises away from the ground. The ground is massive. But it is electromagnetic, also, and electromagnetic spins reverse along axis that is exactly parallel to the Earth's surface.

For example, above the X axis, the spin is clockwise, and below counter. If a wire was run, and steel fishing line was placed around it, or on it, when electric current passes through the wire, the wire becomes magnetized according to spin and polarity relative to the ground, what is above and below the wire, AND what is left and right of the wire, all in opposite spins, and the revelations of this led to special generator designs, but also follow electromagnetic energies of which the ground must be part of, because from the ground it is measured.

That is an aspect of gravity, the field of energy of the massive ground, of that energy which ultimately is electromagnetic, of the Earth ground.

Those experiments were done by Ed Leedskalnin, the builder of the Coral Castle.


It can be said that Gravity is another form of electromagnetism.

​​



Here's another aspect of a gravity lens as I like to see it:

gravity warps increase or decrease distance traveled because it takes less time lets say ... or more time to arrive to any point in space. That's the basis for warp drive.  Space and time transform with each other.  Think "paradox."

Is it the light that is bent or space itself?  Relativists say space. Nothing new there. We've heard it for years. Gravity curves space.  My friend could answer,

"I've always heard it bends space. Apparently the logic is since gravity is the attraction between masses, and photons have no mass, they can't be directly affected by gravity, therefor space is being bent."

It's a really mind-boggling concept for people to wrap their minds around tho, in general.

People don't believe in themselves, that what they realize is real. So they choose to think linearly instead because ... so they don't have to believe that they CAN. ... can realize the truth and it be correct. They have tools to verify the truth. Just not involving politics ...   

If you increase the time frequency of space in a corridor, you can travel at a normal speed through accelerated space and get there faster. It's simple.

People don't believe they can accelerate space itself over a great distance stretched out far away from one's self - point of reference in space - because they don't see how they directly touch that space, even if at a great seeming distance.  If they can't see how they do it, they can't see how machines can do it.

People will claim many things, even that they can accelerate space but it take much longer time because space is increased in length, instead of decreased.  But then they wouldn't be thinking clearly.  That's the problem relativists run into. That's why they claim speed of light cannot be exceeded by mass (matter), not taking into consideration negative energy, which now we can put a name to, to explain the logic.

This website does not use relativistic logic, but paradoxical logic, to see through the construct of space and time. That's why people can't believe it, which is so simple. People can be paradoxes themselves.  You cannot use linear math to explain what is not linear.

​






​