Theoretical Physics meets Tesla Engineering,
. . . and Metaphysical Relativity
With special thanks yet to be announced ...
Well let's throw Time travel for later , We aim for the stars not the time , Time is But an illusion :p
Well I've thought about the time frequencies we've been speaking about , check this
The capacitors of time frequencies like the suns and the planets etc , and even smaller objects have a certain signature within the energy, this signature could be described as a vibration that has a wavelength ,an amplitude and a Frequency, this vibration expands around all mass and while expanding within the energy , (because of the energy pressure of the whole universe), the vibration loses in amplitude , and due to the constant reduction of the amplitude the wavelength is increased , Now Imagine a ' S ' crush the S from the sides and it will become one Segment , That's what I'm describing with the vibration ! the Universal Energy is reacting oppositely to the expansion of this vibration to maintain the Universal equilibrium , Due to this, the space time waves are local !! And light is the measuring unity !
Now mass produces these vibrations with certain frequencies and , amplitude and a wavelength, probably you know it by now , the space is the Wavelength itself , and time is rather the frequency of these vibrations;
The closer to Mass the bigger the amplitude thus the less energy density and the shorter wavelength thus Time is more 'accelerated' , thus space is the most shortened/warped near mass. On The Other Hand the farther from the center of mass the shorter the amplitude thus energy is rather more in it's static condition, it regains it's original density 'almost' (NON vibrated by mass) and the Longer Wavelength Thus space seems to become tooo much Bigger and distances seem longer and also time is less accelerated far from Gravity because the frequency actually decreased when the vibration expanded far from mass!
Thats why i'd like to introduce the Term 'Local space-time vibration' which can eventually be fluctuated and manipulated !
From this we can conclude that time is more important than gravity , Thus X1 does not really work as an electrogravitic engine ,
Apparently the rotating u-trons produce some electro-magnetic field which is indeed vibrating , the instant the U-tron goes through the C shaped electromagnets a magnetic field is created with a certain force , then when the u-tron continues it's passage through the C shaped magnet this magnetic field would looses in 'force' and this electro magnetic field is resonated through the Capacitor plates!!! and the cycle keeps occurring multiple times , each time is actually a Time vibration/wave which expands just like the vibration created by mass and keeps loosing in amplitude and gaining in wavelength just like mass ... Then the time wave at certain important stages would become able to correlate with the time waves created by earth thus can actually be independent and Move. And within the process the ship builds some higher-than-earth accelerated time framing condition which would shorten the distance for the ship and induce what Otis called a 'through time' travel or even teleportation is a good description , even though we speak about telportation as a relative thing it just seems as teleportation for us because we are in a lower time frequency compared to those in the ship.
Tell me what you think about that :p
I like how you put it, "the capacitors of time frequencies" ..
What you describe, that process in the first paragraph can easily be built in a spinning engine that pulses electromagnetic current, that is inner-generated like the OTC-X1. It starts off with a larger amplitude to get it spinning, and it will switch back and forth in alternating poles, and as it spins up faster, the pulses get smaller and faster, higher frequency and less amplitude. Right. local spacetime. the energy field can be co-counter rotating, it would have to be .. and in a donut shape.. with the larger central accumulator in the center, it becomes a spherical shape -- like a planet that increases its frequency in an inner-expansion that decreases in amplitude.
Right .... Space is the wavelength, and time is the frequency.
So, it transforms raw mass into a higher and lighter frequency. Farther from the center, the shorter the amplitude.. okay, so the raw mass tends to drop off as it moves from the center to the outside edges of the sphere of energy. Okay. It has to be magneto-electrostatic, so .. the whole thing would have to be redesigned in my head.. lol ... >stand by<
Okay.. wind a coil around the entire outer perimeter. Each electromagnet will have to be timed so they all turn on and off at the same time. hmm.. even better .. an interference-wound toroid shape, like the outer ring .. that can handle an alternating polarity of electromagnets, like positive-negative-positive-negative, all pulsing at the same time as it spins around inside the toroid.
The other way to do it is like the X-1, but one half the electromagnets (all the even-numbered ones) turn off at the same time all the odd-numbered electromagnets turned on, as it spins around in a circle. That would obtain a "snap-reverse."
Otherwise, they can all pulse in the same polarity, and have a spark gap, so that the outer coil picks up a high-volt induced charge when the magnetic fields collapse, and then just have capacitance in the system to generate the spark. The inner disk can build up capacitance as it spins in the other direction, because it DOES have capacitor plates. The outer electromagnets induce a charge in both the outer coil winding, and say .. the utrons and capacitor plates on the inner disk. That way, the spark can be generated between the inner and outer rotors, instead of just in the outer rotor ...
That would give it the magneto-electrostatic energy, the sphere of mass's static condition. It would generate a huge field! A real solid hard field that you can truly feel, like a forcefield!
Holy wowness !!!
"The closer to Mass the bigger the amplitude thus the less energy density and the shorter wavelength thus Time is more 'accelerated' , thus space is the most shortened/warped near mass."
Shorter wavelength is less amplitude though. Wait a minute.. does time actually speed up FARTHER from gravity?!? .. Hmmm.. time is frequency, space is amplitude. The wavelength is the frequency of one wave.
The closer to mass the bigger the amplitude and less energy density (energy density = frequency). Time is more accelerated at shorter frequency (faster time), shorter wavelength. That would TOTALLY imply time actually slows down closer to mass. That would imply space is shortened AWAY from mass. The central accumulator has a set frequency and amplitude, being a battery .. but with additional capacitance, it can also increase in its own frequency as the engine speeds up. But the outside edge would be higher in frequency POTENTIAL, and greater amplitude because of the amount of energy generated along the outside, where the action is.
Time is accelerated when the wavelengths are shortened. I think this implies that the outside edge of a massive body like a star or a planet has faster time, and stronger gravity, in the static field area. Traveling to the core of a massive body, there would be zero gravity, as the pull of the surrounding mass cancels out, because its pulling from everywhere surrounding the central zone.
Why is the outside more of a static condition then the inside? Is it? Should it be? That means that the static spark would be handled in the outer rotor, and the inner rotor supplies the power. In case of an external toroid winding with internal component, the outer edge would CONDUCT the most static force, as the spark gap occurred between the inner and outer toroid rotors. The inner rotor of THAT could simply be utrons in a geometric pattern of say, 12, to match the frequency of the 12-point interference-wound outer toroid coil. Mount the outer toroid coil on some bearing, and the inside and outside could both spin, but there would have to be something to induce motion, so it would have to be a three-ring segment of inner and outer rotors with a surrounding interference-wound Rodin toroid coil. The inner and outer rotors are utrons and electromagnet coils, 12 of each that repel each other.
That whole toroid shape would be the center of mass, and the static field would radiate but be less amplitude the farther away. The inside would be a "black whole," a mono-pole zero charge, or a photonic whole, rather than a black hole.
It will retain its original density because of the mass and weight of the engine itself (the spinning rotors and outer winding).
By the way, you can simply things by looking at the amplitude of the wave as the energy itself, not something that changes the energies, but as the result of frequencies. You can eliminate amplitude as a component of your calculations, and treat it as a result of your calculations. The amplitude isn't the phase of the mass, that's handled by frequency. The amplitude can be considered the distance of the field.
A zero field still has a distance. For example an electrostatic field has a phased-to-zero magnetic wave. You can still feel the electrostatic wave at a considerable distance, even though the electromagnetic part of the wave is phased to zero.
A bubble can be felt, electrical static can be felt, corridors can be felt. The energy, depending on what it does, can be felt physically to be different in each condition. Some of it feeling more like water, and some of it feeling more like uncomfortable zapping.
"Thus space seems to become tooo much Bigger and distances seem longer and also time is less accelerated far from Gravity because the frequency actually decreased when the vibration expanded far from mass!"
Wait a minute.. the frequency can't decrease when the vibration expands far from mass, the frequency would the same, unless it came into a resonance with a different energy field of a different frequency. The volts of an electromagnetic field determine the field. Volts AND frequency can be made to increase or decrease in a transformer. The voltage/frequency may drop off a little away from the field, but the field wouldn't be able to be detected really before that can happen. However, seeing the relationship between volts and frequency (higher volts is higher frequency), static volts can actually INCREASE farther away from a static source.
The frequency of the Earth static surface charge can be increased the further away from the Earth surface (through a transformer), but it cannot be DECREASED the farther away from the surface through a transformer, because it is the Earth frequency which is being transformed. Each winding to carry the FREQUENCY farther at a distance adds to the frequency and volt resonance-induction of the field of energy created by mass.
However, the voltage CAN decrease farther from mass in a condition of a magneto-electrostatic charge. The voltage and frequency induced by lightning will be decreased the farther away the lightning is from the point of where it's measured.
It seems that it is the frequency of time itself which handles the resonance of the ship, causing it to float over the Earth, and even disappear from touch, and finally disappear from sight at the highest frequency.
I see! That is the independent field, allowing for travel.. because distance is no longer the same, anywhere; moving a step to the left would put it way over to the left by a few miles. Moving a step to the right would put it way over to the right by a few miles.. And that is why thought allows it to be piloted, because the ship actually occupies the space of a greatly expanded distance. It is just a matter of "focus" literally as to where one intends to be, relative with a parallel Earth frame of spacetime. The original frame then becomes a parallel frame to the pilots who are still trying to process this information being entangled (still focused) with the original spacetime frame before the engines were turned on.
The higher the frequency, the greater the distance the ship can be at any given time. Through a series of hops, the ship will move to a much greater distance of example, 20 frequency seconds. One second would be the local space-time vibration of the distance the ship exists within, at one moment of measurable frequency.So if the ship can exist anywhere within a 10 mile area, the ship can travel 200 miles in 20 seconds, and that's at a relatively low RPM. At an RPM of 186,000/12 = 15,500 RPM, the ship will travel at light-speed. Through resonance of two engines side-by-side, that can be increased at least by a factor of 10, according to what the QEG (quantum electric generator) has demonstrated dealing with two resonating coils. 10 times the speed of light gets us to Alpha star in 0.43 years, not including Special Relativity.
Adding the frequency resonance of the vertical core could increase that frequency, also in a transformable direction from a distance away from the "ground surface," increasing the frequency TO the ground surface, transforming the space before the ship into within the "static center of mass."
The static center of mass surrounds a photonic whole. It's like only being able to see a black whole from above, and not from below. From the side, it appears as brilliant white light.
That's what I mean by a tachyon. The energy is derived from the static center of mass, but that energy is also teleported in front of the ship (well, "above" the ship) and brought back into the ship higher than the energy from the static center of mass that created it. Think of the time it takes for the energy to move back to center (its origin), at higher volts from when it originated from. By traveling into the past, well, when we look at a star, we are seeing it in the past, anyway. So literally traveling INTO the past is exceeding the speed of light.
Also, since the vertical core makes more resonance, it would take less RPM's to achieve the speed of light.
And yes, time IS an illusion! :-)
As an addition: The inner and middle rings of the toroid drive system ("outer ring drive") could have capacitor plates in between the utrons and electromagnets, so that when they are both brought together, the capacitance is doubled, so long as there isn't a gap wider then the capacitor spacing, otherwise there wouldn't be resonance, and it could lose capacitance (and voltage/frequency) throughout the whole system.
Metaphysics and Relativity
I don't think the frequency will diminish farther from mass. ... It's like, you can see a wonderful loving positive being, and you can feel his vibes all around him and in his house.. Say the guy is standing on a tall hill. Even though you may be a mile away, on another hill, and still see him through a pair of strong binoculars, and maybe you can't quite feel his awesome vibes from such a distance, it doesn't mean that they still aren't present, regardless. His frequency is still the same. And you can tell from a distance. The amplitude and magnitude of it will be dimisned, though.
Usually when amps are transformed down, volts go up. But at a distance, for example I still detected the same volts from an overhead satellite, whereas my Tesla system amplified that voltage, not by changing the voltage though. Voltage/frequency drop at long distance only pertains a small aspect of unified energy, when it's used in consumption. Otherwise, any unified energy, such as the field of spacetime, will not incur a voltage/frequency drop over long distance, for example from a planet to a planet, or the sun to the outer planets, unless like all the planets all align up in a straight line-of-sight.
I realize you're backing up what I have claimed, that time is faster near a gravitational inertial mass ... I still don't get it why you say a gravitational concentration of mass is less dense then say, out in deep space. And since you brought it up, I can see how gravity has an affect on frequency, equating to time, but .. the speed of light is still the speed of light.
Space having larger surface volumes away from a force of gravitational contraction does not make it more dense, but less dense. There is one thing that stays the same, and two things are being transformed -- time and gravity. The speed of light stays the same, which measures the frequency of time AND space. We know that gravity warps spacetime, and the warp changes "shape" closer and farther from a star, for example; BUT, there is That Which Can Change Shape which is the constant Omnipresence that can be transformed one way or another.
What Relativity means, is that depending upon at least two different points of view, the SAME thing appears differently -- depending upon different points of views in different locations.
You just don't turn your engines off in deep space if you don't want to accidently travel into the future.
Relativity is strange, but only because the speed of light is always the same. The substance, the Omnipresence of the universe is always where you are. For example, to the star, it has an energy field that is charged with its presence that includes the planets. Each planet has its own charge, but not the charge of another planet, and not the charge of the star.
The star can detect its own energy everywhere in the star system, but the planets can only detect their own energy, their individual energy connection with the star, and energies of other individual planets, each of their own.
Through resonance, the planets share their frequencies with each other, and there is relativity, and frequency transformations and shifting; but that is part of the central Star's own frequency.
I shouldn't say "time speeds up farther from gravity," but "light speed is always light speed."
In fact, Relativity as I know it to draw up the LAU-X3 physics shows that time slows down farther from gravity, just as you also claim.
However if light measures the frequency of time, and the speed of light is always the same, then what we see is the fractal pattern of the Universe itself as a Whole Omnipresence. That means our numbers and math is always going to reflect that unified field, just as Nassim Haramein pointed out in his "Black Whole" movie.
The very far away galaxies are always going to be very far away galaxies. Deep space between galaxies is always going to be that same space that is also of galaxies. Space itself, as Nassim Haramein claimed, is what is ALWAYS Space.
. . .
I can appreciate your idea that the vibration is imposed by mass, disturbing the static energy of the universe (universal-static, as a common substance required for electrostatic wave transmission, as Tesla called it, Aether, or what quantum physicists call "quantum vaccum density"), and there is an opposite reaction of the universe upon the mass vibration -- a paradoxical relationship of a unified Universal Form.
There is no cause and effect. Nassim Haramein pointed out that the black hole has been witnessed to be present before the formation of galaxies, and that the formation of galaxies comes from the black hole. Water has formed around the center of distant galaxies like a cell membrane. The Omnipresent Thought of where a galaxy should be is what can form a micro-black hole, the very substance of the quantum vacuum itself, anywhere, at anytime, and very probably in many places, all the time, including in our bodies.
You suggest a Sound.
The Sound of a galaxy fades off in the distance, way out in deep intergalactic space. BUT, you also claim that the pitch also changes (the red shifting), and gets lower and slower, which is what physicists call "the Expansion of the Universe."
Yep. It would seem to be so. The wavelength of light speed is actually lengthened, and stretched from one galaxy to another, from one star to another, from one planet, RELATIVELY to another, and to other stars and galaxies, and the planets around other stars and in other galaxies.
Out in deep intergalactic space, between galaxies, you could see a galaxy off your left, and another galaxy off your right, and they BOTH will be red-shifted. Thus, according to Relativity, out in deep space, Time MUST be slower. That's the paradox.
The paradox is: How can distance actually make a sound lower-pitched, unless it is accelerating away from us. That is the force of gravity.
There are different types of engines: planetary engines, stellar engines, and galactic engines. The sound of the galaxy is heard throughout. The sound of stars are heard at different tones whever you are, always different music is heard of the galaxy. The sound of planets is the inner characteristics of each Star they orbit.
We have a Base Harmonic of the surrounding galactic tone, we have the sound of gravity itself, and the sound of a space of time. If light speed is always a constant, let's say electromagnetic wave speed, or even electrostatic wave speed, is always a constant, even though frequencies can be gravitationally-shifted, then it is not only space that is Omnipresent, but also Time.
. . .
The interference of two objects.. that's a good thought. Interference, but working in harmony for the best outcome for both objects.
. . .
The frequency of our planet is around 8 or 9 hertz. Yes, it looks like the OTC-X1 can greatly exeed that frequency, being that 8 or 9 hertz is very low relatively.
The LAU-X3 creates gravity on top of the ship, because of its vertical engine. The vertical engine can be turned on and off. The X-1 and the Outer Ring can be made to just resonate with each other, without using having to engage the vertical core.
The engineering of the LAU-X3 is different than the X-1.
Just disengage the vertical core, and resonate between the X-1 and outer ring, and that should give two relative points of view, to alter a time-field.
The tacyhon is ONLY when the vertical core is engaged on top of this, as well as travelling into the past.
I make distinctions when I talk about the OTC-X1, the Outer Ring, and the LAU-X3 (all three engines).
Traveling to another constellation of a civilization before the contact occured was NOT what I was implying at all. I was merely saying the nature of the vertical engine in conjunction with the X-1 and Outer Ring drive, had an affect that resembles a tachyon. That's not absurd.
Traveling into the past implies a simultaneous teleportation (at an appropriately matched frequency), or a shortened distance of that which light has to travel. When we look at a star, we see the light from it from the past. When we look at Alpha Centauri, we see it as it was 4.3 years ago.
If we travel into the past, we are traveling faster than light speed, thusly.
light is independent from time, light can measure the rate of time itself, relatively from star to star, planet to planet, galaxy to galaxy, and also measure gravitational forces, returning the information being reflected back from a laser beam (special relativity), or otherwise measuring things generally from light emitted in the universe.
The thing is .. light interference waves must measure space and time. Light itself is everywhere at once. Time is everywhere at once, too.. just flowing at different rates.
It's fractal patterns. We can actually measure these things. It's not the speed of light we measure. It's the speed of wave-propagation through gravity-time fields.
Obviously if light speed is really electromagnetic wave speed, because light is an electromagnetic wave .. well there's a problem with that. Electromagnetic waves are transverse waves. But electrostatic waves are in parallel, and they actually travel faster, at 220,000 miles per second, at Earth time frequency in the Solar system.
It has to be said light is unity, anyway. So magneto-electrostatic energy is basically the energy of the universe, which is light in a paradoxical state of itself.
You have multiple things going on at once, including the fractal pattern of the universe itself, in ALL dimensions at once.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 .. etc .. it's all .. It's All. All at once, but separated through time..
We may actually be able to measure the "speed of light" .. or rather, the "frequency of time" to be different in different places.. but, we won't feel time actually as being different, when in any location, anywhere. That's what Relativity is all about.
I'm always going to be able to count out loud, "one one-thousand, two-one-thousand, three-one-thousand, four-one-thousand" and those are going to be the same seconds that I measure on my stop watch, wherever I am.
We see the light bending around the sun from Mercury when Mercury is still behind the sun, and still technically behind line-of-sight. Relativity depends upon how we look at things differently, and it can still be true.
The speed of light is a paradox. We've been here long enough to receive 13 billion years of light. Does that mean the age of the universe is 13 billion years? Hell no. It means our SUN is 13 billion years old. The gravity has been here, the sun has been here long enough to receive that much light. We can determine the PRECISE age of our sun by looking out into the universe.
Thank you, Gaaliche