The OTC-X1 is open source.

You've got two types of people working on it:  Those who will share their findings with the public, either in a publication they can sell, or for free; and then you've got those who will sell out by handing all their data and schematics over to "angel investors" will will take that and claim ownership on it, promising to fund the successful duplicator's project for a large scale prototype, and then keep it for themselves, and attempt to lock this technology out of public attention, and then the successful experimenter will be shut out, or bought out (sell "out").

I'm assuming that no one has gotten it to work yet, but ...  I do know there are some others working on it, who have emailed me and told me so, but still you just never know.  

I've provided an explanation(s) in physics as to why and how the OTC-X1 can work that distinguishes it from a general electromagnetic motor.  Those physics work upon a special type of engineering involving the electromagnetic collapse. 

I've provided multiple ways this can be achieved, and accumulated as much information necessary to duplicate and verify the OTC-X1 in a range of finite possible "combinations" of engineering and construction possibilities.

An electrogravity craft requires high volts, and high frequency.  The higher the frequency, the less harmful it becomes (harmlessly glancing over someone's skin; nonlethal, discovered by Tesla).  The exception to this is John Searl using rotating magnets in such a way that their rotation (spin) and revolution -- that acceleration frame of inertia -- counters the acceleration frame of the inertial pull of Earth's gravity (plus you have electromagnetism involved, and electromagnetism is an aspect of gravity).

Townsend Brown's technology is involved too, using di-electrostatics.  Tesla used similar dynamics for hull plating on a craft he tested in South America (I read about that in a rare book that was in my hands long enough to write that information down).  That di-electric hull plating involved a magnet, as seen in this link:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02576.pdf

The OTC-X1 uses di-electric "capacitor" plates.

There are two ways the OTC-X1 can work, either as an electromagnetic motor spun from the c-shaped electromagnets, or as a magneto-electrostatic motor spun from the utrons (Bedini style; see the article below).

But there will be an electromagnetic field collapse involved somewhere, most likely across the plates in a longitudinal waveform, which is what I'm currently working on involving my Tesla tower Ley-line power system.

An electron can be a particle or a wave, so why can't it take a wave shape of either parallel or longitudinal energy?  This aspect will be explained later, with a detailed publication on longitudinal resonance and power amplification free from nature.  

The polarity has to be correct in that application otherwise, you'll get a telepathic communication system and biological energy transfer system through a type of man-made energy portal, and then things get weird from there ..  so my point is the polarity has to be correct to get a magneto-electrostatic energy, instead of just an electrostatic energy.  The magnetic aspect is a huge safeguard.  I've talked about this in various places of this website, which is the more weird and spiritual side of things.  

Regardless .....   the type of energy for electrogravity and warp drive involves the electromagnetic collapse, and as Corey Goode said, that the electric static magnet setup is the simplest form of warp drive.  That involves the vacuum collapse of the electromagnetic field which is considered negative energy -- the collapse of the positive form of energy.

​

I'm not currently experimenting with the OTC-X1 because I'm focused on negative energy physics and radiant power generating Tesla free energy, to better explain how this new form of energy works, that everyone and NASA is so interested in, and has yet to understand it fully, but have trillion dollar ideas about how they can make it work for them to generate happiness bought by money...   Excuse me for my sarcasm, but it doesn't require trillions of dollars to build something extraordinarily simple and very inexpensive to establish sustainable and Life force honored reality systems, for that enlightened reality that we all seek, that does involve antigravity and free energy and living-energy biological health.


I'm not in this to change the world or to replace the existing infrastructure we currently have, but to only give us an alternative to planetary destruction.

It has been my intention to provide a framework so that people can understand what it is they are dealing with, however, in case they haven't considered OR EXPERIENCED everything involved.

All that territory is covered in this website, and the OTC-X1 has been fully analysed down to utron detail and accumulator detail and electrogravity detail.

I will be also releasing some information involving permanent high-powered batteries (electrets), but hopefully that information will be general enough so I won't get into any trouble.






There are a few things we are in general consensus over (we the experimenters).

The rotating electromagnets do turn on and off (see the video in the below article "Latest OTC-X1 Pod Update")  When the field collapses, it does so in the opposite polarity.  (that's the main thing we can all agree upon)

That can be considered AC generated from a DC source.  Since the electromagnets ONLY rotate and do not spin, as in Searl's case with his spinning and rotating magnets, then there is no centripetal (inward-directed)​ inertial force involved, as is the case with Searl's craft.  So then the inward-directed force in the OTC-X1 will have to involve a magnetic collapse, that creates that vacuum collapse toward the center, and accumulated at the central accumulator.

This collapse occurs in a longitudinal wave -- a static wave; non-moving, but able to transmit electromagnetic energy by converting its wave-form to "negative polarity," and then to flip it back to electromagnetic polarity; and this transfer occurs faster than light (faster than electromagnetic wave propagation speed).  This occurs over the electrostatic capacitor plates.  AS SUCH, the energy is tremendously amplified in the process, through the by-product of it's own self-generated magneto-static field INNER RESONANCE.

Nikola Tesla and Cal Richardson worked with this style of technology, and it has been made known.  Also Eric Dollard has worked with this form of energy also as parallel waves.  Electromagnetic waves are transverse.  Electrostatic waves are parallel.  Longitudinal wave is flat, like a flat sheet of paper.  The Tesla tower Ley-line demonstrates this in resonance over the longitudinal wave of the energy charge of the surface of the Earth (like flat di-electric "capacitor" plates).


That is the best answer as to WHY the OTC-X1 works.


The utron shape is specific to be able to pass through the electromagnetic gates of the c-shaped outer perimeter electromagnets, in my opinion.

Everyone is so focused on the utrons that they may not be considering the plates.  The plates have a space in the middle that is sandwiched a dielectric stout framework that can support the weight of this assembly.  As such a laminated, layered structure has a high value of an ability to support a structural load, conveniently.  Some transformer cores (nanocrystalline) also are layered, for example.  Also, layered crystalline structures can hold tremendous structural value, and be a di-electrostatic medium.

So this is the answer in physics as to why the OTC-X1 works.

​
​



Addition:

Searl had to add another layer of magnets to prevent his craft from wobbling as it levitated. MIT has actually worked out those inertial vectors that a mass at a certain spin and rotation toward a common center produces not centrifugal outward force, but a centripetal inward force ... that at a certain speed, it's inward vector can overcome the downward pull of Earth gravity. Gravity and inertia and acceleration is equivalent.

David Hamel called it "weight into speed." Add in a magnetic force of rotation, and you can get away with a slower speed with more mass, but the magnetic force does the work to overcome gravity. Gravity is a form of electromagnetism.

​





UPDATE from the comment section:


​In simplest terms ... the outer rotating magnetic field resonates thru the longitudinal magneto-static field across the disk with the magnetic field of the central accumulator. 

The counter rotations of the disk and electromagnets mesh the two polarities of rotating electrostatic field  and rotating electromagnetic field.

That is essentially what the OTC-X1 is capable of AS A MOTOR GENERATOR

​
There is an OTC-X1 wiring video in an article below (latest-otc-x1-pod-update; wiring the OTC-X1). A spark gap in the central accumulator is also a part of the overall ... dimensional framework. ​

Of course also there's a polarity of a magnetostatic spark in the center, and a polarity of electromagnetism at the outer edge.

The static spark also can conduct through a coil wound around the central accumulator to give it a magnetostatic field (a magnetic static field).

Such a field is accomplished through an electromagnetic collapse.  Basically the electromagnets collapse toward the center.


In reference to the wiring video in an article below ("Latest OTC-X1 Pod Update" ; "Wiring the OTC-X1"), might have to make the negative charge closest the the central accumulator ... and the positive charge on the capacitor plates closest to the electromagnets since we're dealing with the collapse of positive energy .... which is what negative energy is.

That's where the electrons accumulate. The electron vacuum occurs toward the outside .. or rather from the outside to the inside.

I can even describe it as a point of electromagnetic light in a spark (Life force), upon which the electromagnetic field around the ship using electromagnets, actually collapse the energy into a vacuum point of radiant light.  Once the initial static field is established, then the electromagnetic collapse will occur in resonance faster than the speed of light (electromagnetic wave propagation speed).
​
It should be obvious that the positive and negative charge distributed along the plate, as the wiring video below suggests, is due to the flow of electrons leaving one side of the plate and gathering at the other side of the plate, however able to interface with the magneto-static field of the central accumulator, literally conducting the electron flow through the "air gap" or vacuum gap to the central accumulator, since it can be wound with a coil and polarize a north/south magnetic field; polarities at the tips, transverse to the accretion plane of the disk.

The energy is considered to be in resonance with the quantum vacuum when the electromagnetic outer rotating field collapses to the center of the central accumulator, in a spark discharge.

That is the MOST SIMPLIFIED way of explaining the framework of electromagnetic form, of these engineering physics.


I do want to add ...   The three types of energies involved here are:

1)    electromagnetic,

2)    electrostatic,

3)    magnetostatic
​
​ . . . along with their associated inertia, polarity of motion, and polarity of field shape.  

To denote the differences, the electromagnets on the outside, the plates on the disk which are electrostatic (di-electrostatic), and the central accumulator which is magneto-static (a magnetic and static field).

I say the plates are a magneto-static energy however because of the vortex flows of the magnetic current which moves from the outside to the inside.

​I can't differentiate or clarify these energies and polarities of inertial forces any further, otherwise it won't make sense.  It is these forms, which define all the action.  If you've never safely felt the fields of these energies, you probably won't be able to make meaning of these  Chi  energy forms.  


Light's inner collapse creates outer space and time.  The OTC-X1 engine does exactly the opposite, outer spacetime collapses inward to a portal that intersects infinite probable energy space, the 5th dimension, it resonates both ways at once, resonating with Light -- Unity Energy (unity of mass, matter, gravity, electromagnetism, and time)

The electromagnetic collapse sends electrons to the central spark gap inside the central accumulator; actually, there's not enough electrons to do this repeatedly, so there has to be some other type of energy that's doing it.  That's the magnetic current.  The energy of the rotating electromagnetic field is transformed into a spark of light inside the central accumulator, and that energy is physically directed into the central accumulator, somewhat teleported.  There's a massive static field that forms from this, and that static field builds up which increases the energy output of the whole thing through static resonance with electromagnetism.  That energy comes from the central accumulator, where the accumulation of that energy radiates outward in a negative energy field.

The outer electromagnets are basically collapsing space, or rather pulling from the energy-scalar-space of the magnetic field created by the outer electromagnets, and sucking that energy into the central accumulator.  So essentially, it's a paradox.  Is it the rotating electromagnets creating the negative energy "warp bubble" field, or is it their collapse accumulated at the central accumulator, or also is it the field generated by the central accumulator that creates the warp bubble?  It is all of the above.

Likewise, do the utrons deliver their energy to the electromagnets, or is the energy of the electromagnets delivered to the utrons?  



This engine WILL operate in this mode.  The ONLY question about it is:  will this operating mode achieve the desired results?  

Magnetic waves do not travel faster than light, but in the OTC-X1 they do.  If magnetic waves travel faster than light -- faster than the frequency of time -- then time has to flow faster to keep up the balance.  This also reduces mass since gravity-mass determines the speed of time.  So since the speed of time is changed, then the gravity-mass is also changed.

We can also examine a theory of engineered time, at this point, to be in relation to the polarities of electrostatic and electromagnetic spin, as unusual as that may sound.  It's actually quite applicable at this point.  The higher the frequency of matter to exist in more "spaces in between the moments of time," then most definitely we can expect unusual results.

I'll spell it out:  The higher the gravitational energy, the slower the frequency of time.  Therefore, the highest the frequency of time, the lower the gravitational energy, and since mass is an integral part of a gravity field, then mass is also reduced.  It's simple, isn't it?  This is a mechanism of matter's ascension into light, THE mechanism.  At very little mass, matter is at a more unified state, and able to travel around like a photon.  Time may tend to get confusing at this point, but essentially time is being superseded. The net effect of higher frequency matter, is that matter is free to move where the normal rules of time and space do not apply.  The pilots won't experience aging, because at a high enough frequency of spacetime, the pilots aren't even in the same plane of existence.  

Pilots would be able to pass through normal matter, and travel much faster than what the more "solid" frequency of the universe allows for.  It's not necessarily that the OTC-X1 speeds up time, as it speeds up the frequency of matter's vibration within that field; and it lowers the mass significantly, that it would appear to have very little inertia (resistance to any motion) at all.  Although, it wouldn't necessarily be affected by external inertial forces, either.

The best way to describe the reality of it:  Time would come to a standstill, and the pilots could just zip around wherever they wanted to go, without it taking any time to get there!


​
Oh yes!  I also wanted to mention (this part pertains to the LAU-X4), that the Outer Ring engine also carries it's magnetic current collapse toward the center -- through the dynamics of the hull space to the vertical impeller core (not just within it's own engine shape).  And likewise, the vertical impeller core sits on top of the central accumulator.

This also applies that the electromagnetic wave carried faster than light from the Outer Ring is accelerated tremendously through the vertical impeller to the Central Accumulator.   <-- very important overunity energy circuit.


​

​

​
John Searl's craft:

​

This is to better understand what I'm talking about, as far as how John Searl's engines work.  

This images can be found at:

abeg.mic34.com

youtube, and

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/41pegasus/02files/Searl_Effect.html


​It's basically a "bearing plate" applicable to support a much larger engine system.  The rolling magnets are evenly spaced apart due to their magnetic repulsion to each other, and they are attracted and "clink" on the outside edge of the central donut, or concentric rings.  Because they roll "forward," they are rolling in more of a centripetal direction.  If they were on the inside of each concentric ring, they would roll and force their inertia toward the outside, instead of toward the center.

The bearing plate itself is much like the OTC-X1, in that it is, by itself, the ship ... the engine that the ship is built around.

This is to explain that gravity is a form of electromagnetism.  The speed of centripetal inertia revolving around the central donut is not quite enough to overcome the pull of gravity, unless the magnetic field did most of the work.  The magnetic field also induces an electrical charge in the donut and in the plates; each rotating cylinder is imprinted with a magnetic sine wave of north/south.

Likewise, this shows inertia (inertial mass) to be carried through an electromagnetic medium, also in inertial motion.  In this case, it is demonstrating mass reduction through gravity cancellation following the Electromagnetic Theory of Negative Gravity, and using the Ligo Gravitational Proof, as a reference.


​
​I would show some Bedini engines but ..  there's just so damn many of them, that it's more of a common technology that most people should already be familiar with.  ...   update:  I found a great Bedini resource from Matrix Le ...  somewhat like Morpheus using the Matrix movie analogy, a great teacher, so I'm doing some website upgrades:


Actually, HERE is a great example of a superb Bedini motor using a fidget spinner without any complex components, to get the idea of what a Bedini engine is really all about.

Bedini power is negative energy, a universal power source.  Any system can receive it!  The volts are super high but is capable of working WELL with systems requiring only 9 or 12 volts or 110 AC or DC!  Universal power source.  No tedious math involved at all!​

This should help the OTC-X1 engineers understand Bedini technology a little easier.





Let me go into detail about this device above:
​


This device is switchable, so to switch from charge to run battery, and back to run to charge battery, so that every so often, you just flip a switch and the motor continues to run and run and run.

At first, the rotor is stalling because it isn't pressed into place all the way, but otherwise the mechanics are well explained and demonstrated, and once Mr. Williams presses the rotor down firmly, it runs super-efficiently, in an overunity mode.  

Now I want you to think about this with the OTC-X1, in that the load generated in an antigravity or electrogravity engine is ONLY HIGH VOLTAGE which propels the craft.  So such an engine as the motor above is the PERFECT EXAMPLE OF HOW THE OTC-X1 WORKS IN THEORY TO CONTINUALLY SUPPLY THE HIGH VOLTAGE FOR POWER AND CRAFT PROPULSION.


IN ADDITION:  It is capable of running a load, powering an LED lamp, AND powering a 7 AMP battery charger, while cycling its own energy not just to continue running, but ALSO to run a load.  

This is a very SIMPLE demonstration, and I have noticed that his video has not gotten very many views, meaning that no one is taking this seriously.  It may be my own fault that I'm not able to disclose this right, but it is what it is, and if one considers that the OTC-X1 is basically involving a regenerative engine like this motor above, where the voltage is used as a propulsion field, with a spinning rotor that is charged, again resembling the Alexey Chekurkov device, then what the potential is, is nothing less that self-powered antigravity, if applied to the OTC-X1.




​

The OTC-X1 is closer to reproduction now that the MEG (motionless electric generator) is better known. The MEG uses a central tuned magnet to resonate the energy of magnetostatic oscillating collapse. What this means is that the central accumulator is made with a magnetized material to resonate with longitudinal waves across the disk you see in the image.

We know a magnet can spin the disk. But a magnetic collapse can too, but using negative energy to do so - the basis and framework in physics for warp drive.
​
If meshed with Bedini technology, using double coil windings, and magnetized utrons, the negative energy can be harnessed longitudinally across the disk to resonate with the central accumulator (it's not difficult to see how Bedini technology can be meshed with this design).  Utrons have to also be magnetic, however, not just the central accumulator.



Regarding a tuned magnet, that technology is somewhat proprietary currently.  It's pretty easy to do, but I'm hanging on to that for now.  Actually, easily enough you set a magnet on top of a single-layer wound coil, power up the coil and tune it to a frequency that gets the magnet to oscillate physically, vibrating back and forth without falling down.  Then you put the magnet inside the coil, on top of another coil (coil 2).  With coil 1 turned on, hit the second coil with a specific frequency: 42 megahertz, the natural frequency of the universe, confirmed also by Cal Richardson.


. . .


In fact, using a nano-crystalline composite material (such as those used in transformer blocks) would be more ideal of a material for both utron and central accumulator construction.  That would give the central accumulator and utrons that darker colored look, in fact, that we see in the historic photos, but only as long as they can be magnetized.  I bring this up to note that due to the darker color in historic photos; aluminum was not the material used, historically.

Magnetizing the utron and central accumulator is easy -- just put it inside a coil and flip the switch.  Tuning the magnet though, is an additional step, because of the need to tune the magnet within a resonating magnetic field (using two coils in resonance -- hint).  That is a step that can be done later for those wishing to try this out.  

I would suggest historically a ceramic (or alnico) magnetic material was used for the utron and central accumulator. 

Neodymium is the choice for today's industrial standards, but if the clearance between the electromagnets and utrons is too little to allow for any accidental wobble of the accumulator disk, clipping an utron could shatter it. An internal steel sub-layer might be a good idea, that the neodymium can be layered, or fitted over, like a cone-shaped sleeve.





In reference to the similar geometry of the outer electromagnets in relation to a magnetic core:

Here is more information about the MEG:

http://www.cheniere.org/megstatus.htm


"Tom Beardon used a novel new core material, which us heated  until molten and then rapidly cooled.  The finished material possesses physical properties somewhat similar to glass.  It’s a far better material for a transformer core.  To minimize eddy currents – just like standard transformers – it is used in thin laminations.  The company that released this technology was snapped up quickly and its product line was "re-arranged"!  Even Tom mentioned, if you buy the same part number after a particular date, you're wasting your time." 
​





-----  In regard to the MEG and the Outer Ring of the LAU-X4:


Some new info to be released will involve Tesla style pulsed rotating AC magneto-static electrogravity at a certain frequency that is the natural negative energy frequency of the universe, to be revealed upon publication of it. The Outer Ring "overunity" transformer will generate it. 

I use the word "pulsed" to denote directing of current, in one direction, but will have more of a pure sinwave in form resembling Searl's rotating alternating magnetic sine wave (from his rotating magnets). That field shape is due to a magnetic resonance from the MEG-style Outer Ring generator heads positioned around the ring.

The conductive hull plating will generate the electric charges to move the ship (Townsend Brown style; see: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02576.pdf).  Searl's engine was in fact part of the bearing assembly for one of Viktor Schauberger (or Schumann ..  I get those two mixed up a lot) crafts that was given to John after the end of WWII. Tesla used such a similar field-shape on an experimental design in South America, but without the rotating magnets, just using electrical frequency rotated around the ship, using the hull plating. 

Searl's ships used a spiraling magneto-static field in a perimeter circle in interference with the downward vector of his rotating magnets. 

Since the lower OTC-X1 engine handles lift and mass reduction, and the impeller is the main directional engine, all that is required is an active negative energy frequency field around the perimeter that resembles more of an X1 style (OTC-X1) outer perimeter field correlation, of negative energy however, to raise the frequency of the outer perimeter of the ship. The goal to be achieved with this is to make sure the ship isn't damaged by fast travel impact of objects on the hull.

What I'm trying to say here, is that the Outer Ring also simulates the same field effect as Searl's rotating magnets, in the spiraling form around the hull.  The Outer Ring also is similar to how the OTC-X1 works.  I want to denote this similar geometry, because many people overlook it, or can't see what I'm talking about, here.  A picture will help, but that'll come later.

The OTC-X1 in conjunction with the outer ring should be perfectly acceptable to still gain the effect of the tendency for the ship to "disappear" or to "phase out of normal solidity," again to protect the craft from high speed impact with random objects or rocks or debris in space.  The Outer Ring, based on the MEG also, will provide the power for the vertical core, hull electrogravity shielding, and other systems, while still maintaining the integrity of the negative energy "warp bubble" that accomplishes faster-than-light travel.





Let's take this idea a little further ...


I think the pods chose aluminum because they figured the electromagnets would lock up if the utrons were made of a ferrous material that attracts to a magnet. The thing is tho, not a single one of any OTC-X1 engineer or experimenter ever considered the collapse of the electromagnet ..
​
​Take out the capacitor plates and magnetize the utrons and fit double coils to the electromagnets and it'll move like a Bedini wheel.

Put the capacitor plates back on and let the coils discharge or collapse over the plates .. the energy generated by the utrons .. hense why Carr said the novelty was that the utrons were like batteries that moved around in the rotor.

In this case, it's not the electromagnets over the plates which induces motion, but the magnetic attraction to between the utrons and electromagnets which generate the induced motion.

The horseshoe style electromagnets would be made of a magnetic conductive material, like a type of ceramic that can conduct the magnetic field, but not lock up at the intersection ...   in fact ..  copper horseshoe cores could work to achieve this.

This is a "reverse" idea, however.

The utrons magnetized north/south at the tips would create a north/south field at both ends of the C-shaped electromagnet core (the metal frame that the coil is wound around).

Also Carr noted that the shape of the utrons themselves prevented magnetic locking.

​


The goal here is to energize the electromagnets, instead of the electromagnets energizing the utrons through a magnetic collapse occurring at the intersection of utron and electromagnet.

Obviously the electromagnetic collapse is important, because that is how negative energy is initiated.

The coils will pick up a magnetic field induced through the core, just like in a transformer, and their collapse after the utrons pass will carry the static charge over the capacitor plates (di-electrostatic plates), if the utrons are the magnetic elements that induce the electromagnets, instead of the other way around.

There are two possible configurations involved here:  the collapse of the electromagnets over the utrons, or the collapse of the electromagnets over the di-electrostatic capacitor plates.




In the case of the Bedini engine, the collapse of the coil induces the motion for the flywheel rotor, pushing the magnets away.

However, instead of the negative energy flyback being captured in a charging battery, they can be collected at the di-electrostatic plates.


​As the assembly rotates, the utrons spin faster, eliminating drag between the utrons and the electromagnet cores.  An aluminum utron spinning on a dremel, if you hold a magnet near it, the magnet will experience a drag effect that gets the magnet to spin, as seen in one of the videos listed here:

​http://www.abzu2.com/2013/06/10/utron-otc-x1-mind-controlled-transportation-device-ralph-ring-otis-t-carr/

It does not mean that an aluminum utron can magically become a magnet, though.  All it means is that the magnetic field can be conducted over the surface of the utron, electrically; through electromagnetic induction.

This is something I haven't yet had the chance to play with, though.

However one can't ignore the similarities with how all these geometries can work interchangeably.

​



In fact, if you really want to get down and dirty with it ...   if you notice historically, the utrons had a coil wound around the outside, and held in place with a type of coating.  This would make it MUCH easier to control the magnetic reaction, by energizing the utron coils in time (with electrical timing to set a frequency).

Now you have two sets of coils that can work in alternation with each other -- the utrons and the electromagnets.

Time it as "1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2," and watch it spin.


In that case, the electromagnetic collapse from the UTRONS can be harnessed in negative energy  polarity. 

This would be much better, because then the electromagnets can be used as electromagnets, and stirr up the electrostatic longitudinal wave field as they induce motion in the disk, as they spin the system in the conventional approach most are familiar with.

​
That would create a very powerful resonance.  The utrons could be of an ordinary copper (better conductor) material with a coil wound around them.  There's only 6 possible configurations that a magnet and a coil of wire can generate a polarity of electricity working together.  Add in the magnetic collapse though, which is what we are looking for as our framework in physics for generating the warp drive bubble, and then that further narrows down the geometries to use to make this work.





One might think ..  well how can the utrons pick up an inductive field, if the coils are spinning in parallel to the electromagnets, instead of in transverse?

That's the point of this framework.  What are we looking at, here?  What is the receiver in this case, the electromagnets or the utrons?  The orientation of this geometry is highly specific.  Inductively, a static field conducts through the air between the electromagnets and the utrons.  A magnetic field conducts over the di-electric plates.  Assuming the central accumulator to be magnetic is the easy part.  But there MUST be that "spark" collapse involved, or at the very least the collapse of the electromagnetic field, as evident from EVERYTHING that we know to work, specifically involving Tesla technology, Bedini, and the MEG.

Let's take a look at the electromagnetic collapse, which collapses from the poles to the zero center of the magnetic polarity.  The coiled utron has a nice "zero-pole" edge which can catch that collapse through the poles, collapsing in one direction on the upper arm of the electromagnet core, and collapsing in the opposite direction on the lower arm of the electromagnet core, creating an electromagnetic induction (electrical motion of the magnetic field) TO the electromagnet coils, energizing the coils.  

If the electromagnetic coils are doubled with two sets of coils, then we can make use of an induction style coil, with a primary and secondary coil wound around the electromagnets.  This is where a snap-reversal comes into play, running electromagnetic current through a charged coil, as the coil is beginning to collapse.




The thing to experiment here:  how does a magnetized utron induce charge into the electromagnet coil, in Bedini fashion without locking up at the intersection?  What material will induce the electromagnetic current to the coil without locking up the engine?  This is why there should be two coils around the electromagnets, one wound on top of the other, like a Bedini coil.

Since the utrons are free-spinning, and conducts electricity through their tips through bearings mounted at the tips, then a magnetic lock would just roll on through, but this would have to be done through electromagnetism.  An electromagnetic current run on a wire spins in the direction of its polarity.  So on one side of the C-shaped electromagnet core, spin is in one direction, and on the other side, spin is in the other direction.


This is the overall framework that we really should consider, in order to reverse-engineer the OTC-X1.

If the c-shaped electromagnetic cores were of aluminum or copper, then would an electromagnetic current be conducted, and induced to the electromagnet coils?  Or would it only be an electrostatic energy, without significant polarization?  



. . .



The MEG and outer ring system with an impeller and hull plating is the easiest part of all this.  But we can't achieve a sufficient temporal and negative mass-energy warp field to make fast hyperspace jumps to another star system without getting the OTC-X1 to work.

We know it worked.  They flew it in California.  There were witnesses, and it is accepted as truth, that it DID happen.  

The whole question of "oh I don't believe it," or "oh it's a bunch of crap" is irrelevant when we have actual designs of a ship that once flew, and was confiscated.  John Searl's ship also.  There are old videos and hundreds of photographs, and verified experiments of the working engine (The Russian SEG), and photos of the Searl saucers at the airport, next to the old DC-10 passenger airplanes; and they were building on an addition to the airport to handle passengers in the saucers, until the military and governments stepped in and stole it, at the time when Searl had dissassembled his crafts to make larger crafts, and so that equipment was easy to load onto trucks and ship on out in the middle of the night.  


This is a pretty solid framework as far as the physics go; and the engineering is much better known now because we have other devices that have been witnessed to work and duplicated and verified to work, including the Townsend Brown technology.

​This is our final piece to the puzzle.  Quite a handy setup, isn't it?

DARPA wants warp drive in 100 years and is encouraging public participation.  NASA EAGLEWORKS wants it too, and Dr. White, in charge of it has signed nondisclosures to the technology that he admits on record that he has been made aware of, and that we do have currently, which is "well beyond warp drive."

The reason why some particular NASA-sponsored articles on the NASA website say that warp drive is merely fantasy at this point, is because the public must be DREAMING if we the people think we're going to have access to this technology unless we make it happen -- which NASA apparently thinks we're just dreaming if we really think we can do it.  That's pretty insulting, isn't it?



This is the OTC-X1 framework that we're looking at.   There's gotta be an electromagnetic collapse going on across the plates to resonate with the central magnet. That's pretty much it.  The shape of the utrons here is part of a simple machine, not something magically mysterious, but pretty much straightforward physics.  It's just gonna take an experiment or two or two hundred, to sort this conundrum out.
​
​​





Update/Additions:

The point at which the utron comes up to the electromagnet coil, intersects, and passes is to consider.

In a Bedini framework, the utron approaches the electromagnet coil, and the coil begins to pick up a magnetic field.  When the utron passes, then the polarity changes, and a snap reversal occurs which rapidly collapses the electromagnetic field because the electromagnetic polarity suddenly changes.  

Essentially the polarity reverses also, because the electromagnet collapses.  As the magnet approaches the coil, in a Bedini configuration, the coil charges.  A rapid collapse of the electromagnet could prevent the utron from attracting to the electromagnet, pushing it along on its way.  If the utron's magnetic field is maintained by a coil winding, then the utron's field and the electromagnet field could collapse at the same time.  

​These are just a couple of different things to play with.

The utrons and electromagnets would be on different circuits, a timing circuit and a charging circuit.  That's generally how a Bedini circuit operates.  Considering that the Central Accumulator can also be made of a permanent battery construction, like an electret (and there are actually several different ways to do this), then the charging circuit flyback output can dump straight into the capacitor plates.

As long as you don't have to worry about recharging a battery, then the separate circuit can be used to do overunity work instead of having to regenerate its own power source.


Considering that the capacitor disk has to have a charge running to it, so it can move via the electromagnets, as the article below, "Latest OTC-X1 Pod Update; Wiring the OTC-X1" shows, then such a usefulness of perpetuating a current to the disk can be more appreciated applied to a Bedini framework.

​








​