Updated: 2/9/16

                                 The Spark of Life



​
This is a simple approach, I don't want to get overly complex with this.

As a resolution to the Life Force philosophy concerning a living energy component in the system, the engineering balks at it. The only easy way to do that would not be a permanent way. What is most Sacred is most Permanent. The Central Accumulator should use Power Cell Electrets primarily. For one thing, having a living electrolyte can decay, and that is a much worse energy to be around.

Here is a simple cutaway view to give you an idea.  Regarding an utron however: An utron as a solid component of mass with a conductive non-magnetic surface and non-magnetic core is a better inertial generator. An utron picks up an electric charge in paradox to the motion of the electromagnets. This is required for "electro-gravitation." 

​Otis said they acted as the "batteries" that revolved around in motion, because he was dealing with a self-regenerating circuitry, not with a Central Accumulator as a permanent battery that never dies out.



However, using a Living Electrolyte, with alternating copper and zinc plates, the zinc would be consumed in the energy reaction, and I am unsure if self-re-energizing the battery would prevent that, but with a Spark Gap inside, it would become a Living Energy Battery.


​
There would be more power overall, would require the Accumulator to be separated into halves, and the Bedini Schoolgirl circuit would be the circuit that works. There are some interesting things about Utrons regarding their electrical capabilities when moved through electromagnetic field coils as the OTC-X1 Engineer teams have discovered. Also Carr said that the Utrons act as COILS (Bedini! Hint Hint).

Separating into halves is an easy thing, separated and affixed to the central rotating disk (accumulator frame), where the appropriate electric connections can be made (conductive strips and electrodes). The interior sphere can adjoin in nearly halves, where the accumulator frame (central disk) can make up that difference at the equator. It doesn't have to be a perfect, but the spark gap should be attempted PARTICULARLY when it is surrounded by a living energy eletrolyte such as fresh leaves and brown sugar mixed to a paste.

​Actually, I wouldn't use sugar AT ALL.  That does have destructive properties to the body's aura, which has been shown through science. I would use something different, if I were you.

A Living Electrolyte Energy would feel very good, I imagine, to those who have spent years living in Tesla fields!

THAT aspect of a Living Energy Battery is more worthy to build then a Power Cell Elecret Accumulator, and could be Life-Saving and Life-Regenerating. I would be a fool to just summarily discount that.  Luckily, the wiring should not be all that different as described below, which all mainly pertains to a Power Cell Electret Accumulator, just to make things more interesting.  

The design of the Accumulator "Reactor" below will not change, other than the plate material, and whatever considerations for dealing with the electrolyte without it seeping into the hollow sphere. You'll have the benefit of seeing two designs in one, somewhat at the same time (multidimensional article), and in somewhat of a comparison / contrast. 


 

​
​
​
It won't spark itself. It has to be sparked by a high volt flyback charge from the apparatus it's connected into.

Here is a quick view just to give you an idea:

​We can even commutate it or use a Bedini schoolgirl circuit to get the spark in the correct polarity! 


If I may make a note on materials of the Central Accumulator. Mixing copper and aluminum will cause corrosion because they react together to create a small current. Eventually the aluminum will be consumed.


                     I have noticed some flaws in the design above. The bottom electrode has
                     to run up in an insulated passage to the gap inside, and a wider rim must
                     be present in the hollow cavity so the spark arcs where one intends it to be
​                     arced (won't arc off the frame).

                     Hah!  Even better. Do away with the top spark gap electrode in the center
                     of the Central Accumulator, and just run the lower electrode to the direct 
                     center of the inside sphere, like a plasma globe. It would resemble the radius
                     of the sphere, half the diameter in relation to half the circumference, but as 
​                     the PI of a sphere, where the Origin is a point of charge.






  --->   In parallel, volts don't add, amps do.  The Accumulator internal structure is stacked in plates, so it could get up to some voltage (not a whole lot, but maybe 20 to 30 for a small test model). It would be easy to see how many watts an accumulator would generate and the breakdown of volts / amps. Easy enough to design a scale model, and add up the output per each segment. Would be making a bit of a guess, but it could be a close estimate. 

I think a Hutchison power cell matrix would just be a whole lot easier overall, also (UPDATE! NO! A LIVING ENERGY BATTERY IS BETTER! ALL THE BELOW MAY NOT HAVE SUCH UPDATE NOTIFICATIONS). We'd be using the whole accumulator instead of halves. It would last forever. Using rubber o-rings to divide each plate stage into segments would make more efficient use of that Power Cell compound since it doesn't produce a whole lot of power. A Central Accumulator of this design can include a hollow space in the middle.

Easy to build.

You can't just do this though: Fill with compound, add a plate. Next segment:  Put rubber spacers in, fill with compound, add a plate, repeat. Charge. Hold. Let it cure. 

The reason why is because each segment must be charged separately, because each segment won't generate but maybe .8 volts.  So the volts would have to stack, so they add up; and in parallel the amps can add up in the wider parts of the Accumulator, using multiple rubber o-ring spacers to create segments that can be connected in parallel and in series, to add up amps and volts.

Each power cell electret shape can be molded into the appropriate shapes and have them pre-charged up. So we just drop it right into the Central Accumulator assembly as we assemble each half.

..............................


Benefits:  

               last forever (or for a long time, 20 years?  Dunno about that part)

               It would simplify the wiring of the OTC-X1 (except for the commutator)

               Would not require a commutator (actually, it just might after all; see below)

               We could easily pulse the current (start and stop it) in the outer electromagnets to obtain field
               collapses if we so desire.



Dr. Ning Li of the Huntsville NASA facility was working on a gravity engine using a Bose-Einstein ionic condensate where the charges of the particles were all in alignment, and she rotated a magnetic field over it. She used lasers to stimulate the condensate so the particles spun at a high rate. She ended up seeking funding to further its construction, and ended up leaving NASA and working for the Chinese government. Haven't heard about her since, really.

www.warpmetrics.com   ...   they also discuss an alignment of charge in a rotating magnetic field.


That's what's happening in the OTC-X1 with the charged utrons, and the rotating magnetic field of the outer "rake" of c-shaped electromagnets.

But whereas Dr. Ning Li was trying to harness the entire mass of the charged particles in condensate, we are already harnessing a significant mass with the spinning gyroscopic action of the utrons. Now this is relative!  The weight never changes, but we have an inertial force generated gyroscopically.


EAGLEWORKS-NASA is also wanting to work with a condensate. 






PART II

I really want to make sure that this simple concept is known:


When an electromagnetic field collapses, it does so at the "speed of light," at in resonance with the whole coil and all the strands of wires. That field collapse creates a back voltage due to the motion of the field as it collapses rapidly through a field coil.  That also creates a very high volt spark if harnessed in a spark gap. That single discharge is what is harnessed to recharge the batteries in a self-regenerating circuit, such as a Bedini schoolgirl circuit.

That same thing happens in an induction coil that generates a spark. That's how it works. (This is for the OTC-X1 Engineer who commented)

Strangely enough, generating an electromagnetic field does not do anything out of the ordinary. A magnetic field collapse also multiplies upon itself in resonance (like how a bar antenna which is a coil of wire must use a magnet in the center to increase its frequency of what radio stations it can receive).

A forceful reversal of a magnetic field collapse, driving another magnetic field in opposite polarity will push a more forceful high volt spark.  That is called a "snap reversal."

Such a reversal could be achieved at the "top dead center" point of the utron.

​I want to make sure that these dynamics are also understood.

This is also another example of "magnetic field compression" or "condensing" the magnetic field.
​






Theory:



Let's examine the Central Accumulator shape.  Volts stack. Amps are strongest at the width.

What we have is a "lattice."      This is also true for the Living Energy Electrolyte Accumulator design. 

At the widest edges of the Central Accumulator, the volts stack vertically. The wider plate-stacks will carry the highest volts. That volts stack all the way to the narrow widths of the tips of the Central Accumulator.

What will Amps do?

We can't add each segment up to gain higher amps, because that addition is reserved for voltage only; but that does not mean that the amp-rating for the Central Accumulator is only obtained at the little electrets near the tips, because that discounts all the other amps.

Electricity will also travel along the inside edges of the Central Accumulator housing, which are conical at a 45 degree angle, so half the amps from a horizontal section will add. Where's the other half? How does that affect or transform voltage?

​
I think the plate stack will also develop some resonance; the difference between a capacitor and a battery is that the battery is self-generating.


This is also why the Central Accumulator has to be much larger in comparison to the outer electromagnets, and the utrons.


A hollow spot can be constructed so when the two Accumulator halves are screwed together, it leaves a hollow sphere in the center, but we don't want to isolate that place in a faraday cage. We want to allow the "guts of the plate stacks" to poke through a bit, maybe using an electrode flush with the inner hollow sphere, but with a little air-gap around the electrode to the inner housing.

That hollow spot will accumulate a charge; but, it may be different than what we're used to, conventionally. A zero pole of a magnet does exist, and you can track it with a piece of magnetic reading paper. There's nothing much going on at the zero, other than inner-folding action of energy upon itself. We could extend a couple of electrodes in that area though, give it some light to see what's going on.

But the electrodes will be charged, and by allowing energy to form in the center, it becomes more dynamic. (see the above diagram).  Magneto-Electrostatic Current.

​Any time a spark gap is used on a circuit, then that energy primarily becomes magneto-electrostatic; it literally changes the entire nature of the whole system in the most totally remarkable way!

A self-regenerating Bedini circuit will use high volt flyback from the collapse of a magnetic field to recharge the battery. That can be harnessed through a single spark gap as magneto-electrostatic current. However since this battery does not need to be recharged as a power-cell-electret, it would still accumulate a charge from the "spark-space" in the center of the Central Accumulator-Reactor. It has the potential to overcharge.

The spark is easiy to obtain in a Bedini self-regenerative setup, such as what the Living Energy Reactor will do. Just because it has a spark gap to jump, it will still recharge the battery and provide an "over-volt" static charge.


The only theory involving the hollow sphere so far, is involving the "light space" in the middle, for the reason that in a high enough gravity field, that space will not interact very well due to too much of a time dilation involved. The energy of that time dilation can harness a charge, however. 


​

PART III  

steering, maneuvering, pilot interface




These are the next to be addressed, which are still being reverse-engineered.  

Steering may be accomplished by adjustment of the field coils.  360 degrees in a circle.  At 0 degrees, or at 90 degrees, the electromagnets could turn off (or be weakened) in that quarter of an area, and in timing. That would adjust the voltage applied to the utrons, and the ship would drop a little there.

That energy would go toward the rest of the electromagnets, giving 'er a push!

Increasing the voltage to the utrons over an arc at the front of the ship while decreasing the voltage toward the rear arc could pitch the ship up. The ship could roll to the left or right similarly.

Knowing how it works makes it a lot easier to know how to fly it. John Searle's crafts flew in a similar manner.



In an advanced version, rotating electrogravity hull plating can be used using principles of Townsend Brown, to move it laterally in a direction, or adjust the trim.  Searle's craft developed a charge on the surface of the skin. A plunger rod would stop that area from developing a charge for an easy way to pilot his style of craft.

The large picture on the home page has a graphic representation of this on the right side about mid-way.

Searle used just a simple form of maneuvering just from a basic hull, merely charged. Positive charge toward the front and negative toward the back will move a ship forward. Adjusting the charge along the wing-tip edges to turn them on or off was Searle's method. Charged hull surface developed naturally due to the rotating magnets of his engine.



​

A spark discharge however, could be applied to steer the craft, in a collapse or field reversal of an outer electromagnet. As it might suddenly reverse the charge of one utron for an instant, it could affect the motion of the craft. 


​ 

Thought-piloting the craft would require a photonic interface. Brainwaves emit photons. Photons are magneto-electrostatic waves.  There was an easy way to achieve that in the recent past, and so it is an easy thing that will eventually come along. Just as I experienced through my own Tesla electrostatic field, it can also apply in an engine!

Now here is where a living energy battery system might have a serious impact to be compatible with a thought / intention Pilot interface. Chances are it would not work without a living energy component to the Central Accumulator.

It's interesting though that there is a "light space" in the Central Accumulator. I wonder if it will change color per frequency? This would change the entire design of the Central Accumulator, separating the two halves and adjoining them to the central rotating disk frame. 

Information (light) of the engine frequencies would have to be known from outside the Central Accumulator. So there must be a design that can incorporate this, so the two halves of the Central Accumulator can be screwed onto the central rotating disk.

A spark gap can be included inside the Central Accumulator.

It can also be a particular bridge. The electrodes of the Central Accumulator can extend also to this region of the internal hollow cavity.  It is something to consider. Perhaps Argon gas fills the space, as Tesla was so fond of. A hollow tube going up the drive shaft could be fitted with a crystal globe device, all air tight using pressure bearings if need be. The crystal sphere or globe device might require an electrostatic fractal array inside. See toward the bottom of the Warp Drive News page. 

Radiant Rise:  That is an electrostatic current that flows out toward air, say from ground.  You always put your bare coils, plates, spheres, toroids up away from ground, and openly exposed to air.  We've got a ground with the spark gap, and an "open air" with a crystal sphere, even though it may be filled with something like argon gas. Glass will conduct an electrostatic charge also out into the surrounding air of the cockpit.



This applies to the Electret aspect:

If sparks are created right over the utrons, from quickly turning off and on the electromagnets in rotations in a point-style timing around a flywheel type of design, then the collapse of the electromagnet would ultimately spark between the gaps inside the Central Accumulator.

Energy coming from the utrons may not need to be harnessed but only within itself, very likely boosting the output tremendously, of the electro-inertial  field shape.         Electro-Gravity



Flyback through the electromagnets' own circuit would create a spark, if gapped in the central accumulator.  See the mini-section below about "Wiring the Spark Gap."

​That perhaps is the easiest way to achieve it. Just merely extend the electrodes of the Central Accumulator close to each other for its own spark gap.  We can even use a comutator.  

Although with a Hutchison Power Cell Electret usage, it probably wouldn't matter. The only time polarity seems to matter as far as a spark goes is just how a secondary coil is connected after the spark gap down the line. One polarity or the other, it will place more electrostatic energy on either the floor or a ceiling, in a Tesla transformer setup.



The interesting thing about this, though.  Let's say there can be a system-wide spark gap at the center of the Central accumulator, in the inner hollow space.

That would be a more direct way of CHARGING the battery!  This would be very fun to play with.


It would charge the Accumulator Spherical Center with a static scalar space. That would turn the entire nature of the overall energy into magneto-electrostatic.



​Corey Goode, a Secret Space Program whistle blower mentioned two things in a sentence once pertaining to what is required for a basic warp drive:  Gravity Cancellation, and a Static Electromagnet.

     --- >     The Force of Inertia transmitted through a Scalar Field.








WIRING THE SPARK GAP:


This requires a type of Bedini schoolgirl setup.  The utrons acts as coils. See the Bedini schoolgirl circuit schematic on the Warp Drive Engineering page.

This would require the utrons to be connected into the circuit.  When the electromagnets collapse their field (turned off), that energy has to run back to the Central Accumulator.  Historically the OTC-X1 used a self-regenerating circuit. But since it is using a power cell eletret in this design, the battery doesn't need to be re-charged, but we can treat it the same.

It occurs to me, if the electromagnets are turned off, and the circuit is broken, then flyback volts won't return to the Central Accumulator, but must go elsewhere instead.  The most logical place is to the utron. A connection by wire to the commutator (see below) would momentarily connect the circuit to the Central "Reactor" for current to flow. 


An Example of sparking:

If the power to the electromagnets are shut off like with a commutator function, but using a special type of switch that just barely breaks the contact, then as the electromagnet field collapses, a spark will jump that gap, and travel back to the Central Accumulator spark gap.

We know that the crystal globe in the cockpit changed colors denoting the electrical frequencies of the engine. So that must be included into the engine design however, and so it would involve the utrons, or something that involves a change of frequency (motion, increasing distance -- speed -- between timing points, and the like). 

The historic OTC-X1 craft used a self-regenerative circuit, probably the very same circuit used by John Bedini as seen on the warp drive engineering page. Central Accumulator in two separate halves, or otherwise separated by an "accretion disk" with electrodes / contact points. *

One could get creative with the circuit design of a permanent battery, though.


NEW INFO:  Check out the Video of how to understand a Bedini circuit on the post just below this one, or just click here and scroll to the end of the article:   http://www.warp-drive-physics.com/construction-blog/otc-x1-reverse-engineering-breakthrough



​

​



COMMUTATION:  
​
           --- >   I want to briefly touch on this.  There are a number of ways to do this.  There is a handy space between the Central Accumulator, and the capacitor plates, and that's the only space we have to work with.

Since wires have to be run to the capacitor plates from the Accumulator (the "Reactor"), then there is a place to lay down some metal contact strips along the circuit route.   Very stiff rods can reach, affixed to the electromagnet-support frames close toward the center of the craft, and they can have a rolling ball or metal wheel that rolls along, making contact with the conductive plates, and rolling along, also contacting non-conductive Accumulator framing.  It would be better than a brush. Tension can be applied with a spring. It wouldn't wear down any parts.

There is enough space on the original OTC-X1 blueprint to allow contact plates to be positioned far enough apart, on both top and bottom of the Central Rotating Disk Frame affixed to the Central Accumulator "Reactor."  They should be far enough apart so no spark will arc across any contact plate. There can be strips further in toward the center, and further out toward the electromagnets, in that "commutating area space" to make sure there is enough space so no sparks will arc needlessly, and cutting power to the electromagnets, shorting across connecting strips.

I've made similar commutators. You just cross the wires over to the opposite ends and reverse the polarity when the current is supposed to be in the opposite polarity of what you'd connect directly to otherwise.

Pretty neat!  Utrons also act as coils, so there is plenty of interaction available for a reactive and resonating "spark"  magneto-electrostatic  circuitry. Since the utrons act not only as inertial generators (solid construction), but also coils, then there very well may be a zero point at top dead center over the utrons, at a magnetic gate or "zero" axis of symmetry.  


I would think some sort of additional frame (a wiring platform) would mount to the outer frame and/or inner frame, could even use bearings, to handle all the transmissions of the energy, placed in the space that you can clearly see just right around the Central Accumulator in the image on the next post below. Such a thing could be creatively done.


 

​

                                                ~.~.~.~.|.~.~.~.~



The images below are an experimental generator / motor I built using two outer coils and then the one large one you see. The outer coils poked inside the big coil, and there is a very large magnet inside. I was experimenting with perpetual energy before I discovered the Bedini School-Girl circuit.

Notice the little round thing at the bottom though. That is the Commutator. 

It could either generate AC, or DC, and it could be powered by a car battery (12 volt DC) and generate AC, OR DC.  The commutator made all that possible. 


This is to satisfy the OTC-X1 Engineer in the comments who wanted more substance behind my words.​ Thank you, OTC-X1 Engineer for giving me the perfect moment to share this bit about Commutation; from one engineer to another:

Above:  various photos of the generator / motor, itself.

​Below:  Photos of the Commutator! 

These above are photos of the Commutator. It used 6 wires primarily that could be connected (touching the contact plates). It was a very simple thing to figure out. 

The wider disk at the bottom, I could have put that shiny metal conductive plate instead of around the outer edge, but on top of the flat part of the wheel, like how the OTC-X1 commutator can be. There is so much space on the flat central rotating disk (accumulator frame) right beside the Central Accumulator. 

The photos above are rough and crude, but the OTC-X1 engine would have to be much more refined than this.   The purpose of a commutator is to switch the polarities around so you can get an AC current going in DC. That's it.  That's basically its purpose. Naturally, a magnet and a coil of wire generates only in AC. So it's easy to get it to generate an AC current. But, it has to be commutated to generate a DC current.  

In a DC generator though (there are several ways to generate pure DC; I've experimented with all of that), sometimes you're going to want AC. You do it exactly the same way, the polarities are reversed at intervals in degrees around a circle. If you want to switch the connections, you have a standard connection (common terminal) of 2 wires, and then you have 4 wires coming in for both polarities of DC current (to alternate). You could just rapidly switch the wires back and forth, criss-crossing and un-crossing, but why do that when we can rotate a wheel, to do it automatically while the wires just stay where they are?

That's the concept. An easy way would be to use your 4 wires, call it "Circuit #1" and "Circuit #2" and have the wires positioned on the wheel in (+,-) and (-,+) polarities.  As the wheel turns, you time it by making those wires touch a conductive plate that goes to your common circuit, and then it alternates. It's easy to do. You can either run your common circuit with 4 wires instead of 2.  That's probably the most lame way to do it (with 4 wires going to the commutator as the common circuit instead of just 2), but it's not that difficult of a thing to do is my point.

Look VERY closely at it ...   you can click on the pictures and zoom in.  I screwed up and had to use a dremel to cut the wide plate so I could have an extra "electrical-contact pole" on top. It was one of those "Doh!" moments. 





Path of Current:

One thing I learned with this, is that electromagnetic current does indeed take the shortest path (I had to try it).  However, electrostatic fields and current are not limited to that. For example, an electromagnetic current can take a winding path along a bare wire around a squirrel cage. If there is bare wire touching metal framing, that current will take the shortest path.  You don't have to worry with that limitation using electrostatic current. 

Another thing with electromagnetic current used on a bare-wire winding around a squirrel cage, is that an electric field will run in parallel. It does not run around in a spiral, but takes a path from the top of the squirrel cage straight down to the bottom (along z-axis, the height of a cylinder)!  Eric Dollard and his genius Ham Radio Operator friends clocked the electrostatic wave (parallel wave) at 220,000 miles per second!  

​Di-electric current (parallel; electrostatic) can be beamed, just like a radio wave and form a circuit with the ground through a field, and allow for an electromagnetic current to flow through that field without a wire. I tested that with a AA battery (see: Tesla Engineering Physics). I'll put far more detail about that in my book. I found all that out because of my Tesla tower and console. Also, Eric Dollard teaches that. 

Magneto-Electrostatic current WILL conduct along an insulated wire (any kind; magnet wire, rubber coated; conduit). An insulated magnet wire wound in a coil in the shape of a long pole -- it will only conduct a static charge only if there's a spark gap. But, it does conduct a static charge in parallel and in tranverse to parallel surfaces!  That is what can be considered as "Unified Current."

This also applies to the Vertical Core Vibration Engine, as it creates a scalar magneto-electrostatic inertial field with unidirectional [inertial] force (charge and magnetic inertial - spin alignment).





Rotating Squirrel Cage

That's a possible way to do it. Know what a squirrel cage is? It is the frame, the cage used in electrostatic and magneto-electrostatic coils, like on the Tesla tower photos on the Tesla Engineering Physics page. 

Vertical rods mounted to the outer hull that are rigid. They extend down and touch the central disk, and have a bearing on the end touching the central rotating disk (accumulator frame). Circular guide rails on either side of the vertical rods at the central rotating disk (accumulator frame). 

Circular metal conductive plates affixed to central rotating disk (accumulator frame as some call it), for purpose of commutation (a Flat Commutator on the accumulator frame in that space between the Central Accumulator and the capacitor plates). The vertical rods are the "wires" that contact the commutator. 

That's a cool idea, but the rods would have to be adjusted further in or further out to be on different "commutating tracks," for practical purposes.  Otherwise, in a classic squirrel cage, where the rods are all around at the same radius, it might be interesting; Tesla loved his one-wire connections. I imagine one could get pretty creative and fancy with this.

Regardless, a squirrel cage frame would be good and solid to run wiring to contact points.
​
​

​



​

                                                                                                                            UPDATED:   2/20/2016

Thanks to the American group, we now know what the ship is doing, how it moves, and how it works.

It is an easy concept pertaining to gyroscopes. The gyroscope-action of the utrons makes the disk spin faster. 

A current is applied through the central accretion disk from the inside to the outside (positive toward the center, negative toward the outer edge). When the disk is energized, the outer electromagnets cause rotation.

Due to angular forces, as the disk rotates faster and faster, it causes the utrons to spin. Once the utrons start to spin up, they also interact with the outer electromagnets, and recharge the Central Accumulator.  The utrons are mounted on bearings, mounted to the trunion frame. The shape of the utron allows for an acceleration THROUGH the electromagnetic gate, particularly because the utrons also develop a charge, and it contributes to the acceleration overall, also speeding up the rotating accretion disk.

The article below this discussed a bearing motor, also, how a charge applied will cause rotation. The shape of the utron allows for a polarity of charge to form at the tips (positive at one end, negative at the other). 

The test performed by the American pod showed that their utrons do develop about 35 to 40 volts (in DC -- direct polarity). 


Lenz's law and Faraday's law is roughly equivalent. Using yer thumb and forefinger at right angles, ever seen that approach to understanding Faraday's law?  Utron spin, traveling at right angles to a right angle applied magnetic force.  It makes sense, kinda acting somewhat like an electromagnetic condenser to achieve the volts just from moving through the field coils. Tesla used condenser technology quite often in his other works, and technically a condenser is a lot different, but there is a condensing of electromagnetic force at the utron tips which creates electrical charge and polarity.

The regenerative circuitry is an easy concept to grasp in theory, but harder to engineer. In fact ..  switching off and on an electromagnet will create those flyback high volts that by using a transistor can send it back to the central accumulator ...   but I'm thinking that could be a bit of a way to direct the craft. 360 degrees in a circle. Moving parts.  Say at 0 degrees is where you make your on/off so that whatever electromagnet passes that degree on the circle pulses, maybe get it to move.  Yes I realize thought piloted, but just sayin'


So that's what Carr was getting at.  The utrons generated volts as by-product of their motion, hence the "batteries that are part of the rotor moving around through the field coils."


The utrons use the concept of angular gyroscopic force (acceleration and rotation is equivalent to an inertial gravitational force). 


The utrons recharge the Central Accumulator, and we have a very similar circuit design used by Bedini to show how energy can be perpetuated, and self-generating (regenerative).

As stated on the home page, those at M.I.T. technical university have actually worked out the math that an angular gyroscopic force which exceeds the force of gravity will float independently. Gravity cancellation vectors also speed up time as the new physics explain.

The Central Accumulator can make use of it's top and bottom halves to cycle the energies similar to John Bedini's earlier designs using two capacitors to cycle the energies back and forth to perpetuate a circuit indefinitely. There is a schematic on the Warp Drive Engineering page; but that schematic is of his later design using two batteries, however those batteries have to be manually switched every so often.


......

Also, the peripheral of electromagnets, as they push on the accretion disk to get it going, it pushes the peripheral of electromagnets in the opposite direction (equal and opposite exchange, much like if a swimmer pushes on a boat in the water, it also pushes the swimmer back). 

 


MOST EXCELLENT!

Many Thanks to the American Pod, and to the engineering knowledge of Walter Nowosad, a prominent journalist with degrees also in electronics!  
​

~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.






Additional Notes:

      --- > Might want to check back to this periodically < ---



1)

A ball bearing motor is also what the utrons are doing to get them to spin up so fast automatically on their own. The utrons start to spin on their own and generate current from outer electromagnets moving around them. Once they kick into motion, they power their own bearings which accelerates them.


2) 

It doesn't matter in what polarity a DC ball bearing motor is connected (Utrons mounted on bearings mounted to trunion). Once the utron starts to spin, the applied current will accelerate it. At least that's what's been determined so far from other people's work with ball bearing motors.


3)

You CAN run wires to the utrons to conduct current back to the Central Accumulator. Since the Bedini circuit requires a double-coil winding in a special way (one coil wound right over the top of another), then the utrons can still perform this function by wiring them alternately, so that 3 utrons are on circuit #1, and the other 3 are on circuit number #2. See the Bedini School Girl circuit on the Warp Drive Engineering page. This is a possible combination to test.


4)

Note: if utrons required to alternate for circuits 1 and 2, it will have to be commutated since utrons and electromagnets are in DC.


5)

Obviously, a Bedini circuit depends upon magnetic field collapses (look for it; warp drive engineering page has one, but it's for a different generator but uses the same dang principles. Utron = Coil). 

The electromagnets can be timed also in the same space I talk about for using the commutator, which is that space on the disk right around the Central Accumulator. 

The electromagnetic field collapse produces a high volt spike. That induces a high volt electric charge into the utron, which in turn sends it to the Central Accumulator to recharge it -- half of it. The other half of the Central Accumulator powers the electromagnets. 

There are variations. For example, the electromagnetic collapse doesn't have to go to waste, but can be harnessed, and can even be harnessed by jumping a spark gap to flat circular-shaped conductive plates -- part of the commutation. Capacitance can be added to the circuit, so that electromagnetic collapse can charge a capacitor. That was how John Bedini originally designed his first circuit I believe. 

There is one idea. There's another idea of harnessing the electrical energy from the utrons from the magnets with unbroken circuit going back to the Central Accumulator using diodes to direct the charge in one way only.

Now there's the theory. A spark gap. There won't be enough energy for the utrons to charge the Central Accumulator to perpetuate the circuit. So, we have to harness the magnetic field collapse, which in one moment, is enough to return the same energy to the battery (and in some cases with a little extra, but otherwise in balance) as what it took to generate the action. That is what John Bedini discovered.

Dealing with magneto-electrostatic propulsion, and gravity and gyroscopic inertial force, and frequency and resonance, the principles of the craft's operation determine how it will be wired.

​

6)

Gravitation is accomplished through spin, gyration, and rotation, of inertial force in acceleration.


7)

Walter Nowosad discovered an aspect of gyration which has broke ground for the OTC-X1 to illustrate a principle of gyroscopic operation. His experiment shows:  a gyroscope spinning clockwise and rotating clockwise does nothing. A gyroscope spinning clockwise, and rotating counterclockwise causes it to rise; gyroscope suspended on a string.  Utrons are the gyroscopes. (I hope I'm allowed to share this. I have received no further contact from him, so I am proceeding with this disclosure to further advance the course of advancement and development of science).  

His discovery provided the key understanding / evidence / supportive results that verify, well frankly the whole dang thing!  (there are also some videos on youtube about that sort of thing)

I know he doesn't recognize the value of his discovery but, I'm here to tell ya, he nailed it!  It's because of that, and some other discoveries by the American pods -- teams of OTC-X1 Engineers -- that has made most of this page.  Period.  

And now, that piece is added to the whole, and included in design, to explain how the craft works, so we can WIRE IT UP!  



8)

Do Your Research!
​

9)

I can be available to help with a commutator design   (design = figurin' out how ta do it!)



10)

Utrons = Coils.  The shape of the utron condenses the electromagnetic field at the tips. The utron shape is one of polarity.  It has been tested by the OTC-X1 Engineers that an electromagnet will induce a charge unto a spinning utron. They held it in one spot, but moved it a little I'm sure, which may have created a little AC current. It was indeterminable in the report I received (I received one), however "electromagnetic relativity" as I like to call it may apply. Simply put, as you move a magnet to the left or to the right against a coil, you'll measure electric current in one polarity or the other, depending upon how the two (magnet and coil) move with and against each other (in paradoxical motion). 

I'm willing to bet that a C-shaped electromagnet moving sideways over the utron (mimicking regular motion of the engine) will act in a way that the utron can be connected in Bedini circuit. 

Why do I say this?   The shape of the utron determines it as the electromagnet moves on, widening an electric charge in that positive motion, and then moves off the utron narrowing that electric charge, reversing that relative motion so it's a negative current.

A Bedini circuit can utilize that. It depends upon magnetic induction, and magnetic field collapses.  There are two circuits and six utrons. Three utrons will have to be on circuit #1, and the other three on circuit #2.

Hey!  I found the video!




Things to note:  There is a "power" battery and a "charge" battery. The "power" battery creates a repulsive magnetic field and pushes the magnet on the rotor / flywheel. The batteries switch back and forth ultimately so when the power battery runs low it now becomes the charge battery. John Bedini made his earlier models using only capacitors which cycles the energy back and forth.

​The repulsing magnetic field is generated after the magnet passes top-dead-center of the coil. When the magnet moves past a ways, the magnetic field begins to collapse upon itself, compressing the magnetic waves to create very high volts. 

There are many different types of self-regenerating circuits made by John Bedini in the public domain accomplished from an internet search. Regardless, with basic circuit knowledge, you can make your own to suit your needs. 

 
The point is:  the magnetic field collapses and makes a very high volt flyback current, which can be harnessed in a spark gap if it's quick enough (higher frequencies of action). That high volt flyback current will recharge the battery.  The commutator will work directly with the circuit and circuit components like diodes. This stage is truly where the fun and enjoyment happens!  Notice the Bedini circuit uses a basic flywheel, but with no commutator.


You need a little current to engage the power battery. The magnet generates current as it starts pass by (the video considers it "back EMF") but it is current generated in only one way (only one polarity relative with how the magnet moves with the coil). The diode is there to make sure current ONLY flows in that one way; it prevents current to flow in the opposite polarity as the magnet moves to the other side of the coil's axis.

As the magnet moves across the axis of the coil, it generates current in the opposite polarity. That current opens the transistor-gate to close that circuit and powers the coil in a repulsive magnetic pole-to-pole to drive the rotor. 

With a commutator, you can close an open circuit mechanically. You can also reverse polarity of a current mechanically. That's a lot of flexibility. You wouldn't need to manually switch around the "power" and "charge" batteries if you use a commutator. You could even alternate the power and charge halves of the Central Accumulator back and forth every 60 or 180 degrees with a commutator (can't be 120 because it's an odd number of polarity shifts around a circle).  

For example the commutator can switch the polarity of the circuit just prior to a magnetic field collapse using diodes to prevent the Central Accumulator (battery) from rapidly reversing the field so that the field collapse recharges the battery. Also, that would allow the entire Central Accumulator to be used at once. 

In this type of simultaneous action you need 4 wires total, and two separate sets of contact plates (see the photos in the article above this one). You can overlap the timing just a tad.  < --- How to Commutate  --  You don't want to kill the current; there can be no gap in the current in this setup. You can use diodes to simplify it. It's easy to reverse the polarity when you want it; and if you use the diodes, then you recharge the battery with a field collapse, doubly-so because it can also be collected by the utrons and all fed back into the Central Accumulator! 

This is the only time when the electromagnets can be turned off momentarily. There is another possibility though that the utron will handle that automatically. It is possible that it's field will rapidly reverse as the electromagnet crosses the utron's central axis. Because an utron will accelerate through the electromagnetic field generated by the outer c-shaped magnets, it could automatically reverse its polarity and send a flyback voltage to the central accumulator, and the outer electromagnets never need to be turned off.

That is important ---^
​

It's possible all 6 utrons can be used at once (no separate circuits) if it were just commutated. 

But in order to understand how to do it simply, please take some time to learn about these systems so it will just innately come to you when you need it. 
  
​

A field collapse can be harnessed in a spark gap!

Again, The shape of the utron determines it as the electromagnet moves on, widening an electric charge in that positive motion, and then moves off the utron narrowing that electric charge, reversing that relative motion so it's a negative current.

Just like the coil, when the magnet passes across the coil's axis, it shifts polarity. The same thing applies to the utron. 

​This is a principle of "AC Gravity" when applied to the utrons.  The electromagnets can maintain their DC polarity, unless an additional field collapse is to be desired as the electromagnet just passes off the utron and before it enters the next capacitor.  The potentiometer should detect the magnet field as weakening as it passes the utron. Chances are there is no need for a field collapse of the outer rotating electromagnets; but in case you want to get froggy, that extra energy from the quick collapse and rebuild of the outer electromagnet field can be harnessed on Circuit # 3, perhaps to be used elsewhere in another system.

There's a bit left out, though. Some have designed their systems when using rotating electromagnets, to turn off and turn on using a magnetic reed switch. The outer electromagnets may have to collapse their fields right at the zero point of the utron or right past it, to induce the high volt flyback charge into the utrons.  Otherwise, the potentiometer and resistors will regulate voltage through the circuit that the utrons are connected into.  The utron is not a field coil, so it's own field cannot collapse to generate high volts, but the electromagnets can induce that charge into the utron from their (the electromagnets') collapse.


--- >  Again though, it's entirely possible that the utron will cause its own flyback voltage that will have to be diverted in circuit to recharge the Central Accumulator; that aspect of the circuit cannot be broken.
​
That's the difference between the utron and a coil.


It is ALSO possible that the Utron's field CAN collapse to create a unique force; see the comments under the top blog article, "OTC-X1 Theory, Design, Wiring, Operations."  

There aren't any real test results to even start contemplating that aspect in any great detail, but all this stuff on this blog page is what gets us there to test for "electro-inertial" frequency and field collapses in the Utron. 

I think it is possible after all; and if we can harness that then we can harness an electro-inertial scalar (static) force in the utrons with frequency and motion (increasing the frequency of the inertia which is in motion, with motion -- frequency transformation).  There has to be movement to make it move; movement for the ability to amplify its frequency (rotating scalar / electrostatic charged fields). ... movement of Energy.

See those comments which also explain how frequency is measured by the spark gap (it shows us the frequency of the engine). Harnessed in an electrical corona, it will change colors depending on the frequency of the OTC-X1 engine.  


In fact: 




​

11)

Inertial Frequency, like Electrical frequency, can be vastly increased when in resonance with a magnetic field. A basic radio concept can apply to inertial fields, because ANY field of energy can be amplified and raised in frequency. The trick is in how to do it.  But the real accomplishment is understanding it.

If you have an electrostatic field, you can use an electromagnet to raise its frequency. 

You can work energy with energy. When you know what energy is, and how mass and inertia and matter itself is energy, and light, then you can use Energy with and upon Energy because it is all One Substance.

An Inertial-Electrostatic field has a component of mass in electrical alignment; rotating charge. 

Use an electromagnet to raise it's frequency. The only problem is that a straight electromagnet current will overcome (displace) the static field, so you have to use a "static magnet." That involves the collapse of the electromagnet field, and harnessed in a spark gap. 

The utrons will be generating also an electro-static field due to the spark gap. When I mean "generating" it is an inertial field generator, but an "electrostatic accumulator."



The frequency of the engine is the speed of the spark gap. Harnessed to make an electrical corona, the color of it's light will represent the frequency or speed of the rotating engine.



The weird thing though ... The current from the spark gap has to go through the electromagnetic field coils to generate that static magnet.

So, the utrons would have to collapse their field to generate that spark, so that magneto-electrostatic current can transmit to the electromagnet c-shaped field magnets in order to increase the frequency of the utrons. Seems those systems can work somewhat simultaneously, luckily. Resolving such a paradox requires "simultaneous light." 


A static magnet, or magneto-electrostatic current is generated over wire and through electromagnet coils, initially from the spark gap to kick it into resonance. Magneto-static harnessed in an electromagnetic coil induces a magneto-electrostatic current into another coil, or a hollow copper sphere, or some plates of metal, or an utron.

These energies ought to be able to be traded back and forth; an utron field-collapse must be understood in greater detail to understand more about how a scalar inertial field can be transformed (amplified; raised in frequency; transformation of current and static fields). 


I like the concept of an electro-inertial field collapse, though. It is something that can be tested, in the OTC-X1 Development.
​



​

12)

Energy Displacement (sounds sinister). I know an electromagnetic current will displace an electrostatic current. Sometimes, it will even depolarize or re-polarize a ground. I learned all this and discovered it from my experiments. Once, a weird electrostatic charge developed in the tower and started rising, and I zapped it a few times with a weak electromagnetic current trying to discern what it was not. It was an anomaly. My console and tower were linked mainly with just one wire. I did some really wild and amazing things with that system! 

When all the systems on this page are tested, we'll know how to do it. But that above about the static magnet, that is our key in physics and theory to understand how to build this engine. The Tesla Engineering Physics page on this website can be further viewed, which is based on experimental evidence, observations, and duplicated accomplishments of Nikola Tesla (and myself, too). It also discusses displacement of electrostatic charge by electromagnetic current. It's not theory. It's fact. 

Tesla observed the electromagnetic compression of electrostatic radiant energy that filled the power lines when there was no electricity present when he worked for Edison. You can discover it yourself, it's duplicatable. I'll be providing a lot of documentation about all my own experiments in a book. But not on a website because it would be way too much.



When I started this website (actually this website's predecessor "Lightdrive-Ascension" back in 2011) , no one knew what energy type lightning was; NASA was saying it was electromagnetic. Mainstream science has radically shifted in just 5 years or so.  In the NEXT 5 years, people are going to understand what is being discussed on this website. 

What can be said in just a sentence or two is sometimes easily overlooked which could make a difference of understanding or not.  This stuff is difficult for even me to skim through.



Understand that a Static Magnet is the static field produced in a coil of magnet wire, wound around a long pole or PVC pipe for example (or a C-shaped magnet), produced from the spark gap and transmitted in a MAGNETIC field AS CURRENT.  Electrostatic is transmitted along bare wire (AS CURRENT). A static field and a scalar field, you just gotta make that mental connection there to understand this. It's written all over this website. Those people who say a "static current" is an oxymoron and can't exist, please get over it or otherwise you won't be able to understand the OTC-X1.
​


Know all the parts, and know the unity, which includes a finite range of possibility that we can test, which is what this page is devoted to. I'm probably over-complicating things because a lot of things behave similar to a lot of other things, but it all breaks down into their unique parts of the All. You can't understand unified force from just looking at parts. But you can understand the parts from looking at the whole (basic concept of Michio Kaku's "Hyperdimensional Physics" -- when you can see it from the highest possible dimension, then all the lower dimensional action instantly makes sense).

When dealing with what is quantum and zero and light, then you deal with simultaneity and paradoxes of non-causality.  Which came first, the chicken or the egg?  Neither!  Both must exist at once to express the wholeness of both chickens and eggs.  ...  Which came first, the utron field collapse or the magnetic field collapse, and how is it recycled back through itself to give itself that magneto-electrostatic impulse per interval of frequency? 

The spark is both the result and the origin of the action.

This isn't madness as the OTC-X1 Engineer commented;  It is "Deep Analysis."

.  .  .

A spark gap need only be included on the circuit; it is not the end result. See the schematics of that on the Tesla Engineering Physics page.  A high volt resonance from magnetic field collapses and capacitors could be commutated in DC so that magneto-electrostatic current only flows in one polarity running down two parallel wires. 

How do you get the electromagnets to trigger the utron, and then the utron to trigger the electromagnet, and handle that in resonance? If current is run also through the utrons, and through the electromagnets, which would be the primary coil, and which would be the secondary?  ...  These are just thoughts as to the nature of the energy. 


​
Electromagnets collapse their field, and it induces a charge in [rather, on the surface; electricity flows on the surface of] the utron, and that circuit is intercepted by diodes so it won't return to the Central Accumulator. The current from the electromagnet field collapse sends a charge through the spark gap back to the utrons. There will be resonance between the utron and electromagnet as long as the circuit is closed. There's a diagram of a "resonating circuit" also on the Tesla Engineering Physics page.

It's an idea. I surmise this to be a standard feature of any ole Tesla resonating electro-inertial gravity craft.

Two resonating circuits of utron and electromagnets can be regulated by diodes to resonate; the energies circulate through each other connected at one point to build up frequency (and current), yet it would be as a sound. But would it be a sound like a hammer striking a gong, or would it be the sound of a rubber ball rubbing around a crystal bowl? 

When the hammer of the electromagnet strikes the gong, diodes run the current in one way, so the utron has initial energy to vibrate with, and the current resonates in one way:  from the electromagnet through the Central Accumulator, to the utron, and back through the electromagnet through inductance.  It can be done the other way, too.

Strike the utron hammer, with a field collapse, and then feed that current from being induced in the utron through the Central Accumulator, back through the electromagnets, to be induced to run back through the utrons and run through again, etc. Those are three different things to try.

There really needs to be a constant input of energy, though, at very high volts. Looking at an induction coil, a very rapid back-and-forth alternation of current induces field collapses in an electromagnet in AC magneto-electrostatic configuration.

Now.

THIS is a very interesting bit, here.  See the Tesla Engineering page -- there are pictures on that page about this.  That AC current (created from an induction coil or similar action; creating that spark) has polarity so that you can put the positive charge (the lightning) on top (on the ceiling), or the positive charge on the bottom (on the ground; floor) by connecting that AC current to an exciter coil to induce energy into a secondary system in either (+,-) or (-,+) polarity (and having a conductive disk on a concrete floor that a coil stands on -- see the photo of my "Tesla Console"), which also can be rapidly reversed back and forth if one feels the need. Just a 6 volt battery can make an induction coil spark with rapid frequency for a long time.

So if you connect a little exciter coil (a few winds of thick magnet wire for example) around a long pole wound coil of very fine wire, then you can connect it in either (+,-) or (-,+) to put the vibrating serpent-dance of static charged energy either on the ceiling, or the floor, depending on the polarity.  And you can commutate it and make it alternate with polarity as it alternates with polarity!  That secondary winding could be spinning, rotating, and gyrating to create an inertial field which is supercharged with high frequency through a static magnetic resonance which penetrates beyond the surface (like the vertical core -- see the big picture on the home page --  or another device). A magnetic field runs through the object, and so induction is throughout the object, so the energy of mass (and thus inertia; thus gravitation) is transmitted through a magneto-electrostatic field.   <---  That is similar to Dr. Ning Li's theory of gravity-engineering on her design (See: Popular Mechanics article "Taming Gravity" 2003 I think is the year). Whereas she used a laser to raise the frequency of rotating mass in a magnetic field, I'm also using light -- as a paradox of magneto-electrostatic energy to do the same job.  Actually that is what the OTC-X1 is doing, if it utilizes a spark gap, which it probably is in order to create a unified energy field.


That would have to be the final thing to consider as an aspect of "wiring," in order to electrically raise the frequency of an inertial scalar field. 

Those are the finite combinations to test if the OTC-X1 doesn't work in a simpler way. 

It won't be nearly that complex as all of that mess above for the OTC-X1, in actuality.  It never is. 

This is where research and development COULD lead though, branching off into these other areas in order to learn more about the universe, and what we can do with gravity-engine systems.  (magneto-electrostatic resonance of electrostatic charged inertial fields; inertial fields involve spin, gyration, rotation of mass;  acceleration field = gravity field   according to Einstein).

That could also lead to Outer Ring Engine systems with two counter-rotating scalar fields.
​

​


​

​

13)

​Final Wiring Plan:

The electromagnet moves over the utron, inducing a polarity of current to the utron, transverse to the motion of the magnet. The magnet will have to roll over the utron, like a gear that turns the utron into motion, so the magnet will have to reverse polarity sharply. It reverses its field when enters over the utron, and reverses it back before it leaves the utron. 

The timing doesn't have to be precise, because a snap-reversal will induce a high volt collapse just the same as a break of the circuit induces a high volt collapse, only the snap-reversal will be a little "harder" of a collapse, but may cost more energy. The field collapse is induced into the utron (a bonus). 

It doesn't take any energy to turn a circuit off and turn it back on. But a magnetic field collapse creates more energy in a single instant, then a stretch of distance of (using) normal electromagnetic current.

That collapse is harnessed in the utron to recharge the central accumultor (also with magneto-electrostatic energy in a spark gap) as the alternating current rolls over the top of the utron.  Traditionally, a Schoolgirl circuit only requires one flyback of higher voltage to recharge the battery. But there's only one coil (the utron). And using half the utrons won't induce the other half, directly.

An utron field collapse may just be just like two coils wound over top of each other, but it's unable to induce itself, like a Bedini coil.  So the only option is to use a "snap reversal" of the electromagnet field coil, so the reversing polarity of the electromagnet rolls right over the top-dead-center point of the utron. Actually the magnetic field spins, and just like how electromagnetic current is induced into a coil, that magnetic spin pushes the utron to also spin, at right angles (angular; transverse).

A fast field collapse of a magnet occurs at light-speed.  We need a longer span of time to generate a high volt current, but in an easier way than just a discharge, but we need high enough voltage to bridge a spark gap inside the central accumulator.

There it is.

The central accumulator accumulates the living static scalar energy, "sparked into life" from the spark gap inside. 




The Earth under my Tesla tower behaved like there was some spark deep inside the Earth, it was the same energy as that -- electrostatic energy.  The Central Accumulator would develop a bio-energy radiant field similar to the Earth's energy field.  This can be harnessed also by a secondary system (such as a special Tesla Transformer) with an exciter coil for the Outer Ring.

The Outer Ring will need a separate auxiliary input of magneto-static current. That input can be amplified using a Rodin coil, wound in interference like how Daniel Nunez does it at 1stopenergies.com has been demonstrated by Jamie Buturff in Sedona to amplify energy through resonance of sacred-geometry Pythagorean harmonics of frequency. In co-counter-rotation, maybe more, and harnessed through a cylinder-shaped Tesla style coil stuck through the middle (pictures forthcoming; book). 

There is a bit of a current in a potential 3rd circuit in a Bedini engine, as seen in the video above. There may be a little energy left over in a third circuit from the OTC-X1 engine. This energy can be rocked in an induction coil to generate a very high frequency spark discharged, that can be harnessed as magnetic current.  The faster the frequency (harnessed in capacitors and transformers) increases the current speed (cycles per second). I'm sure a way will present itself.

The energy can be amplified in both amps and volts.




​

​

​

This is a homopolar (unipolar) dynamo.  The concept is sound.  Also, this has been tested by the same pod member who made the video above.  He pulled out a capacitor plate, pulled out an electromagnet, wired them up, and it moved like it was supposed to, but heated up due to shorting along the capacitor.

He probably hasn't figured how not to heat up his capacitors, which is why he hasn't made a video of the motor moving.


To avoid this heating up due to direct shorting of your capacitors, see the top article on this page called:

Analysis and Principalities of the X1 Focusing on Rotating and Counter-Rotating Charges and Negative Energy​

​


​

A 90 degree utron cone of radius B (diameter of L1 - L Prime) is cut from S to F, keeping the material of width C along circumference R1 (R-prime; the outside circumference).

Don't forget to subtract for material thickness.

Since it's a 90 degree cone, it shouldn't have to be anything fancy I don't think . . .   This is the geometry I can suggest, although I haven't cut it out on a large sheet of construction paper and thrown a framing square on it to check.


What this is for those who need to know:  You cut out the pac man shape on a sheet of copper or aluminum or something (actually steel is best due to ferrous and non-reactive properties as we are finding out), and then you bend it into the right-angled cone shape for a utron half.  You have to cut a hole in the center for it to fold into a cone properly. 


​Also...   shorter cones cut X.  taller cones cut Y.  The taller the cone, the narrower the bird-mouth cut will be.  Sorry if that wasn't made clear in the image.  I thought it would be too self-evident, so I just left it as a vague note ..  But now after coming back to it and looking at it and being confused about it, I just HAD to make this note.  Obviously that doesn't matter since the utron is a right-angled cone x2.  So that was just an afterthought I noted just to explain how you can derive your own utron sizes.






​

                                                                                                                      EDITED:     (1/28/16)
                                                                                                                      UPDATED:  (2/13/16)
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeyDf4ooPdo


A 40 pound weight on the end of a steel shaft is spun up (on bearings) which makes it much lighter to hold, and hoist, but the weight stays the same.

Here is the second part:

​https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLMpdBjA2SU


One has to wonder about gyroscopic action.  If the utrons spun at high speed, it would create a gyroscopic force.  One has to wonder about spinning the central disk really fast, while there is gyroscopic action taking place in the utrons, if there were gyroscopic action of the utrons.  It would create an angular force of inertia.  

In the videos above, a wheel is spinning perpendicular to the plane of Earth gravity. From the perspective of the fellow holding the wheel-on-stick, the top of the wheel moves right, and the bottom moves left. The spinning wheel thus travels to the right. If the utrons were designed to spin, as the accretion disk also spins, then there very well could be a gyroscopic force of lift. 



Gyroscopic angular inertia.  Okay. So how would the utron spin when passed through the magnet? .... THAT may be an interesting thing. We can assume the utrons are not magnetic. However if charged, then the utron would develop a polarity for example positive charge on the top tip, and negative on the bottom tip. Would that cause a spin in the utron when it passed through the c-shaped magnet? The c-shaped magnet is also polarized North and South.

​Isn't there a law of physics which relates to motion along these lines? Lenz's law ... ??  If an induced current flows, its direction is always such that it will oppose the change which produced it.   

​An opposition would induce a change of motion.

Instead of using a big granite sphere (Hamel style), we can use 6 utrons.

Those utrons would HAVE to be electrically charged. And they'd have to be charged on their own, not being induced. <---  It's certainly a good idea. Don't mean to say it would "have" to be generating its own charge, but it will have to be charged to induce spin in the case of a "bearing motor" discussed below in this same article. Would the utron cause itself to spin by its own self-generated charge though applied to a bearing motor concept?

​

So, an aspect of gravity cancellation will use angular inertial forces at right angles (90 degrees). Very interesting. 

Both at 90 degrees, and at 180 degrees, we can see some action. Utrons on opposite sides of the accretion disk, opposing each other, both demonstrate 180 degrees difference, and 90 degrees inertial interaction.



It is kinda strange that the utrons are so relatively small. It could very well speed up the accretion disk they ride upon. High volts though, applied to an angular inertial force ... think about the mass and "weight" of ALL those spinning electrons all lined up in electrical alignment, all spinning in synchronization. HMMMMM.......


DID YOU KNOW that the Utron is in the actual shape of an electron? It's "similar action." An electron seen under a powerful electron-microscope will detect an electron as a 2-dimensional square! Remember, you can only detect either the electron's position, OR it's momentum, but NOT both simultaneously. .... it's like a big macro electron ..

​Electrical Inertia = Angular Force

Perhaps, charging up the capacitor plates will further increase the rotation of the central spinning disk, huh?

​Take it one step further, and think about the inertial mass increase due to electrical force.  That would create a time dilation.  In particular since it is cancelling gravity relative with Earth at 90 degree vectors, generally.



In the Vertical Core, it can be seen how angular rotation also generates a vertical force.



One last thing:  

I may be mistaken about an utron being pushed into motion as it passes through the magnetic gate, because of magnetic braking.  However, One thing that was brought up though, about the utrons, is a "bearing motor."  Applying DC current to a couple of bearings mounted around a steel rod will get them to spin in one direction. Merely electrically charging the trunion bearing mount of the utron may very well CAUSE the utrons to spin. Problem solved.



A DC current positive on one end touching the outer bearing casing, and negative on the OTHER end, touching the other bearing casing has been observed to cause spin of a driveshaft. 

Easy enough to see:  Steel rod. bearings at both ends. Touch positive wire to one bearing, negative to the other. Spin.

You can't get a wheel to spin by pushing on both sides at once (utron passing through the c-shaped magnet).  You can if you only push on one side of the wheel, or push on one side and pull on the other.

So ..  apologies for my over-enthusiasm.  I ran across a bearing motor long ago and tucked it away in memory because I had a feeling I'd need it again. 




So just to be totally clear:  

Bearing motor:

Steel rod.  Bearings on both ends.

Touch positive wire to one bearing outer casing, and touch negative wire to the other bearing.

Spin.

​(electrical inertia = angular force)


....   (The bearings are circular shaped. There are 360 degrees around a circle. I have seem this demonstrated where the pos. and neg. wires are both at the same degree on both bearings, not like one wire at 0 degrees in placement, and the other wire at 180 degrees in placement.  The demonstration I saw was with the leads placed in the same position on both bearings.)


​
When the utron passes through the c-shaped magnet, the utron spin will slow down (magnetic braking) if there is a magnetic field applied at that time, unless it's just a fast pulse.



​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Follow Up:  

The utron is not locked down, and is free to spin according to Walter Nowosad.  Logically it seems to me that the utrons are designed to spin.  Come to find out the trunion which supports the utron on its frame does use a bearing, which is what the pods have determined.

Please see the video below, wiring the OTC-X1.

The "capacitor plates" which are just called that, do have a current running through them to induce motion via using the outer electromagnets.  That can be seen with Faraday's Law, AS WELL AS Lenz's law. The plates are wired positive on the inside and negative on the outside edge. Without an electric current, there would be no motion.





Follow up number 2:   


​There was a video I saw where a guy used a central rotating disk with two magnets, angled at 45 degrees like utrons, and he duplicated the setup we have going on with the OTC-X1 in that style.

The angled gyroscopic magnets were opposing each other on the wheel (flat central rotating disk).

A few things: When the magnet wheels (angled at 45 degrees) spun up real fast, and then the central flat disk was started to rotate, the disk would end up going very, very fast and the gyroscopic magnets stopped spinning, trading that inertia to speed up the disk they mount to.

If they were to spin the opposite direction though, and the central rotating disk spun opposite to the angled gyroscopic magnets, then it would have to push against an inertial force. That force angled at 45 degrees would apply to countering the gravitational field of Earth. There would have to be a sufficiently powerful driving force to spin that Central Accumulator frame on the OTC-X1 opposite to the direction the utrons are spinning. The spin of Earth will mean that the rotation of the engine would be some RPM's less (from 50 - 75 according to Otis T. Carr and John Searle, on two different engines) depending on if it went with or against the spin of Earth.

That would be opposite in the Northern or Southern Hemisphere (because the Earth is spherical).
​




​
​

​