Rotating and counter-rotating charges antigravity demonostrated in Russia with an un-identified metalic alloy.
Please check out the research of Alexey Chekurkov, who created the Alex Flying Craft.
He does have a lot of that metal on hand, however. He has made other apparatus from that metal, as per links below. It resembles an iron / tin allow for corrugated roofs with perhaps, a galvanized zinc plating.
It would most probably be a standard type of easily-acquirable metal.
Also note the power supply in the video below, using a Tesla resonance transformer. His standard power supplies however are using "positive energy," rather; whereas these metal disks are essentially rotating air capacitors. Being able to conduct magneto-electrostatic fields and usage of the Tesla resonance transformer denote that they are charged as a field at high volts, using non-standard electromagnetic (positive) energy; and the electromagnetic energy from the transformers would be going toward powering the motors that spin the disks, not using homopolar motor technology.
Note the blending of the energies of magneto-electrostatic and electromagnetic in high volts.
Furthermore, he uses neodymium magnets in the positions of the utrons near the outsides of his lower disk. The magnetic field near the outside while spinning them, denotes the electromagnetic collapse of magnetism toward the center -- in that field geometry.
This begs the question of the utrons being magnetic, whereas the outer electromagnets of the X1 collapse somehow in timing with the passing utrons, and a coil around the utrons could be built to handle that collapsed energy in polarity opposite of the utron-magnet, to deaden or cancel the utron's magnetic field in order to pass through the electromagnetic gate.
Aside from that complex structure, a homopolar motor design with electrostatic rotating disks may actually be able to handle rotating magnets spinning in the opposite direction of one of two counter-rotating field disks; it seems that the rotating magnetic fields are only traveling in one direction.
It's easy to see the device comprised of two capacitor sets, one on top (with lower rotating disk), and one on the bottom, with lower rotating disk with magnets. He is NOT using homopolar motor technology, and he's using an external Tesla coil power supply, instead of integrating that into his design, although it is using a conductive hollow "hat" similar to a Tesla tower. Also note the static disk, rather the disk that is not moving, with the frame "landing legs" sticking through it.
Note the bottom rotating disk is wider than the upper rotating disk, keeping to principles of the magnet and dielectric layers, using a wider magnet on bottom and on upper magnet, in less width, in adherence with the Townsend Brown in a vacuum test shown on the pdf file on the Construction page in the Townsend Brown section.
Here are some of Alexey's comments:
"A new lightening disk was made and a video was shot. But someone influential complained and yutub blocked the roller. But one user managed to download and reapply but again called feykovy flight. He decided that if the terminal with akamulyatora removed means fake. But I explained that from time to time you need to remove the power from the TDX to prevent the magnetization of the disks and prevent the subsidence of the parameters. If you have not seen the movie, I'll throw the link."
Here, we see the same metal on this video, which is not a YouTube video:
Okay, here's the YouTube video of the above link:
Following his research, you can see more about the field flows here:
AND ... BAM! Found the type of metal he's using:
"This corrugated aluminum with an anodized coating structure similar to the beetle fenders. So successfully coincided."
Guess I need to mention Alexey mentioned in a comment on one of his bug wing videos what the material is -- the anodized corrugated aluminum. I spent hours translating Russian into English and searching.
This represents the first successful testing of the rotating and counter-rotating charge antigravity craft, able to lift a considerable amount of weight, and when applied in an air-tight resonance cavity hull may also work in a vacuum.
So now we know that the rotating and counter-rotating charge principle of physics DOES WORK.
I want to take some still-shots of the videos, and notes, to have a photo reference, just in case, because Alexey mentioned that his prior videos were removed from YouTube in order to suppress the technology.
He uses modified high voltage power supply from switching power supply for his original test. The first disk is powered up using a standard motor, plugged into a wall socket (power strip) which gets it to spin, as is the second disk. The disks are mounted to stationary frame (stationary disk), which the two motors are bolted to. The disks are arranged as capacitors, so the presence of unmoving disks in the engine will not cause it not to work.
After the two disks (the one on the very bottom, and the second one from the top) are spinning in opposite directions, most definitely. You can adjust your video settings for high quality to see better. The next step is to connect the high voltage power supply (after all, as I've said before, all forms of electrogravity use high voltage). In the OTC-X1, that is achieved through high volt flyback from the electromagnets.
Okay. The high voltage is plugged into the stationary disks by the looks of things, and the rotating disks picks up one polarity of the dielectric charges, but both stationary disks are on top of the rotating disks, so the orientation typically used is positive up and negative on bottom. If using positive on the bottom, it would be repulsive to the Earth surface charge, and not achieve significant height, in my opinion.
The orientation of negative on bottom and positive on top effectively means that the co-counter-rotating disks are spinning positive against negative, looking at this in the form of capacitor geometry. His high voltage source is the typical high voltage transformer from a CRT tube and improvised voltage multiplier (positive energy high volts, just like most people do with their electrostatic lifters). You can hear the zzzzzaping when he plugs in the voltage multiplier.
High voltage supply is the box in the middle photo. Multiplier is the hand-held device on the floor in the right photo.
He says the high voltage performs the "magnetization of sectors." It's in Russian, but there is an English translation.
Voltage and speed (inertial frequency).
The bottom left is levitating. Bottom middle is side profile. Bottom right is the bottom of the engine, and those are the 6 neodymium magnets.
Okay so here is the successful test model version 2.
The mess on the left is the power supply. Tesla resonance transformer, and immediately to its right is the power supply for it. The box on the far right is the independent power supply for the transformer block, and the little white box on top of the big white box is the high volt power supply. It's all connected to the 12 volt battery. I'm recording this for posterity, just in case.
Alexey continues to explain that a conflict of sequences steps caused his previous model to fall down, and he has to do a lot of fancy adjustments to get the craft to go up in the air, and sometimes it may take 30 minutes to balance everything correctly. Basically he explains that his power supply system has to be charged up in a certain order, probably due to resonance, like how a capacitor has to be charged first in a basic LC circuit (see the article below), and then when resonance starts to break down, he needs to provide an input to the capacitors, but it ends up going to the wrong place (the transformer instead of the capacitors), and his high voltage signal starts to degrade.
I don't want to speculate here too much about his power system, though. Not yet.
The second device, his working prototype is impressive, and obviously upgraded from the first, yet still having the same overall characteristics, and using better field geometry.
We know now that he is using corrugated aluminum with an anodized coating, which was the same material he used for the CSE beetle (sound resonance cavity) experiments, from the Russian etymologist years ago who discovered that effect. The piece he is touching is the upper rotating disk. This is awesome! It's like a TR-3B engine (1 of 3 on the triangular hull's tips). Just think how this style can be adopted to use a homopolar motor design instead of dipole standard electric motors.
Here below is a better view of the whole top. The special field is theorized in different ways. One theory is a positive and negative electrical mass cancellation. Otherwise it's not very well known how it works to be honest. If you consider electromagnetic spin reverses on either side, up and down, left and right within orientation to electric fields relative to a plane of gravity, then the spin one way and spin the other way seems to cancel gravity, along the middle and much wider disk plane.
Magnets are involved, however. In fact, the article below this one showing the little diagram of the outer electromagnets in homopolar motor configuration spinning two disks in opposite directions is similar but I REALLY LOVE the concept of the centralized wider disk in Alexey's application. Similar to magneto-electrostatic, or just static electricity with the two counter-rotating disks creating electrostatic friction on the central wide disk. The two rotating disks appear similar in size.
If you notice also where the high volt top disk is, it is connected via frame to the central disk, but later on it shows Alexey touching the legs of the device during levitation, and touching the bottom middle.
He uses three wires: one high volt from the Tesla resonance transformer, and two wires from the rotating disks. I would say he is using a homopolar motor design in this version, due to only two wires to handle the rotating disks, and the third as the high volt magneto-electrostatic feed.
Note also in the bottom photos, a contact strip from the legs reaching out to touch the rotating bottom disk area, probably to transfer the charge, as a brush.
It does not look like there are magnets on the bottom of the disk, though.
It looks like the magnet is above the lower disk, and if you think about a homopolar motor, then it would seem to act in just that way.
So there you have it!
Different styles and designs. Makes me wonder about the OTC-X1 now -- counter-rotating electromagnetic field versus counter-rotating electrostatic disk.
Make sure you click on the images to magnify them and see the whole image.
So we have a successful flight test, on two occasions (original model and remake), which looks fairly legitimate; and although Alexey didn't get his camera up close to his craft as it was levitating so we could get a really good super close inspection of it (he may be wanting to keep some proprietary secrets, who knows), at the very least it is demonstrating a familiar geometry:
A rotating electrostatic disk, in counter rotation to a rotating magnetic and electric disk. The lower disk is separating the magnetic and the electric aspects (rotating magnetic field, coinciding with a rotating electrostatic field) in BOTH designs of his. The upper disk remains a constant variable, but the shape of the engine itself has changed (which is okay).
His power system is many times larger than his test craft. The OTC-X1 however includes a potentially self-contained power system in its design, which is why we favor the OTC-X1 for the ultimate craft, yet engines like Alexey's are favored in the testing phase to understand the physics and the power systems.
Yet, we still need to understand how the OTC-X1 works, and Alexey's design is a practical application toward achieving this goal.
From the articles below, we can see how all these systems co-relate, and there is a pattern:
Counter-rotation of electromagnetic and electrostatic rings / disks. There must be a magnet involved, and there must be electrostatic involved, and high voltage, but we can simplify the energy requirements using flyback from the collapse of the electromagnetic coils, while also using those electromagnetic coils as our rotating magnets. After all, a homopolar motor will work in many combinations, in both two-piece and one-piece dynamics.
The utrons also double as rotating magnets, and static field generators. The utrons are in the same place as Alexey's original experimental device, 6 of them around the perimeter, but are oriented along the 45 degree inclination / intercept; and we have some comfortable spacing in between the OTC-X1 components for timing the engine pulses and collapses.
The OTC-X1 blends Searl and Alexey Chekurkov designs.
I would like to open up the Comments field at this point, to gain some much-needed feedback from others about any ideas and discoveries and tests that can be brought to the table of our common goals.
I want to hit some basic highlights however, just to make it easier for the newbies to do a search on.
1) There has to be a magnet to get the device to spin, but the unifying principle seems to be co-counter-rotating electrostatic high voltage disks. (although rotating electromagnetic fields can be intrinsic)
Sources of high voltage:
Capacitance and flyback (utron kinda remind me of doornob capacitors). Don't discount the central accumulator from being able to store high volt capacitance from the flyback. It's strange gotta admit. Capacitance would help raise frequency otherwise there would be a pulsed mechanical frequency that needs to be raised thru resonance and capacitance.
2) I mentioned i'm going to use an induction coil for some tests.. and I got to thinking one big coil could equal a bunch of smaller coils but would still need capacitance to equal what one big coil can do.
3) It would not be a stretch at this point to consider the OTC-X1 as a flying induction coil. If you eliminate the complex scalar warp drive physics and just stick to engineering, one could make better sense of all this mess from doing some creative experiments.
The one noteworthy thing about the utron / accumulator 45 degree cone shapes tho is the intersection of parallel / longitudinal electric and transverse magnetic fields. THAT is probably the ONLY reason they are significant.
4) THAT is what scalar energy is about. Actually no that's what NEGATIVE energy is about. Without that component there's no guarantee it will warp time ... and furthermore cones within cones may make a better crystal power cell electret material alignment in the central accumulator than flat plates in the accumulator.
That means there will be a mini utron-shaped hollow cavity inside the central accumulator.
That also might be the reason the X1 is able to hold its own self-regenerating overunity power system.
Each interior cone segment can have individual electret "sticks" arranged in cone shape too, basically sub-dividing each cone section so the electret material can be better electrified/magnetized.
5) This from Matt Tracy ... in regard to Bismuth and Aluminum alloy in Roswell crash - Arts parts:
"Now I do know that both bismuth and aluminum are paramagnetic. And i also know that bismuth has two very interesting qualities to say the least. Bismuth when flattened to 5-microns or less becomes naturally superconductive at room temperature. Bismuth's second amazing quality is that it is naturally at the atomic scale has an asymmetrical atomic geometry. And we know that it requires asymmetry in the dielectric field to produce a counter wave to asymmetrical dielectric fractal emission that we we ignorantly call gravity."
Aluminum anodized with bismuth is a good idea. I also know of bismuth becoming superconductive in small slivers. Graphite too has similar properties in thin wafers. Diamagnetic or something if memory serves. Able to reflect the magnetic field perfectly to hover a magnet over it.
UPDATE: there is no need for bismuth since a rotating aluminum disk acts diamagnetically upon a magnet, reflecting the magnet's poles.
6) Also ... just because a system may be generating negative energy, it does NOT mean a system is reducing mass, and suddenly a large craft has nill inertia. These are specific fields and the only way to explain them is to show their relationship with action.
If something has no inertia, that is a local field effect and due to a field effect. By now, everyone knows how UFO and TR-3B craft move in their sudden accelerations and right angled turns that don't squish the pilots.
But an electromagnetic field collapse does not make the coil weigh less; but if that force can be harnessed in scalar ways in high frequency, in a perpetual energy of collapse without it filling up, and thus increasing energy output, THEN it's something.
And even tho Stephen Hawking says the total energy of the universe is zero due to negative and positive energy, it does not mean that negative energy is the absence of energy. That is a dumbass assumption.
And I really apologize to those still stuck thinking that opposing fields cancel mass when opposing fields only cancel energy output to zero and they're not even able to get a basic generator to work because they wind their coils in opposition. I don't know what to tell those people who absolutely lack and practical experience and have never wound a coil in their life.
I'm just very careful not to call flyback voltage negative energy, because if it's not overunity, it's not necessarily negative energy. It may have its BASIS in the collapse of an electromagnetic field, BUT it's more complex than that. I recommend reading the website to gain an understanding of it. Some of you absolutely refuse to read the website because you have to READ it, and instead find it easier to peg me with a whole lot of questions that take up my time to be building stuff.
And technically speaking, it's not negative energy that provides the whopping load of voltage, but with very tiny amps. You can GET amps out of it though, which is a complex manner to do so, requiring secondary effects. Negative energy provides amplification, overunity, and in additional configuration mass reduction, but that additional configuration is a complex system that is only theory right now until we can measure it against a clock.
ADDITIONALLY: Apparently the TR-3B is canceling out inertia and gravity and increasing the frequency of time ONLY and JUST THROUGH THE MECHANISM of running high voltage along its hull ... and there's NO NEGATIVE ENERGY INVOLVED WHATSOEVER! ...... This can be used in space then packing the air along with the craft in double-hull configuration, in circulation fields.
As the Alex Flying Craft shows, there is not an ion wind effect of lift as a thrust, because the engine is not designed to use that principle! It's demonstrating come kind of static lift but, not ionic thrust. These physics could just be completely simplified at this point, and go back to how it was on the Warp Drive Engineering page which never once got into negative energy, and only dealt with high volts. I am however convinced that there is a special secret with negative energy, in that an overunity power supply as well as high volts can be obtained through a MUCH smaller generator deriving energy from the electromagnetic collapse.
For those who don't know what a "TR-3B" is, here are some photos:
7) And finally regarding spin... a photon has spin of one whole whereas matter has spin of 1/2. The addition of -1/2 + 1/2 is not zero, but is a 1. Matter and antimatter combine as light, not as zero (as void) as Stephen Hawking would have us believe. (he said the total energy of the universe is zero due to positive and negative energy)
This is why magneto-electrostatic spin and counter-spin cancel inertial mass. Light does not take time to travel; it is a static field throughout All. Only matter experiences time.
8) Regarding negative gravitation:
According to the TR-3B patent (https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en), electron inertia moves forward on the ship, pulling the ship along with it, creating a gravitational force of moving electrons, moving in parallel to the inertia of the moving electron mass. FREQUENCY SEEMS TO BE THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR, when pertaining to electron mass, gravitation, and inertial VIBRATION (and polarity).
Negative gravitation as it pertains to the OTC-X1 very well may be throwing electrons out to the sides, creating a force of negative gravitation in the center, and positive gravity around the hull, negating the local gravity fields of star systems or planets in that polarity of active inertia.
As I stated in the article below, for some reason I had it in my head that the electrons gathered toward the Accumulator, creating a positive force of gravitation there which negated the gravity fields of surrounding local planets and star system fields. .... This needs to be noted.
At this point, I'm not seeing anything new come up; some people are suggesting the same things I've already suggested and discussed. We seem to be on the same page at least ..
At this point EVERYTHING has been taken into account regarding the OTC-X1 analysis and probabilities, and thoroughly discussed, so that the last step remains is to build it BECAUSE WE SEE due to the Alex Flying Craft, that THESE PRINCIPLES DO INDEED WORK!
It's time to build, and put it to the test to see what works, and what can work, and what doesn't do too well.
Once again, the comment section is open in this article for finalizing design specifications to gain some much-needed feedback from others about any ideas and discoveries and tests that can be brought to the table of our common goals.