Antigravity Demonstration Using Counter-Rotating Magnet-Electrostatic Fields From Russia

8/6/2018

NOW UPDATED: Explanation on How It Works, below in PART V

Rotating and counter-rotating charges antigravity demonostrated in Russia with an un-identified (update: now it's identified) metallic alloy.

Please check out the research of Alexey Chekurkov, who created the Alex Flying Craft.

Special thanks to Walter Nowosad for sharing this.

"Special Metal" is unknown. It looks like hammered tin, or an aluminum/bismuth alloy, hand-forged. It looks coated; plated, and easy to machine. It is known that the disks may become magnetized, meaning it is a ferrous alloy. It won't work when the disks are magnetized, probably causing a problem with spinning, or otherwise electrical disruption due to homopolar motor effects back-feeding into the external high voltage power supply.

He does have a lot of that metal on hand, however. He has made other apparatus from that metal, as per links below. It resembles an iron / tin allow for corrugated roofs with perhaps, a galvanized zinc plating.

It would most probably be a standard type of easily-acquirable metal.

Also note the power supply in the video below, using a Tesla resonance transformer. His standard power supplies however are using "positive energy," rather; whereas these metal disks are essentially rotating air capacitors. Being able to conduct magneto-electrostatic fields and usage of the Tesla resonance transformer denote that they are charged as a field at high volts, using non-standard electromagnetic (positive) energy; and the electromagnetic energy from the transformers would be going toward powering the motors that spin the disks, not using homopolar motor technology.

Note the blending of the energies of magneto-electrostatic and electromagnetic in high volts.

Furthermore, he uses neodymium magnets in the positions of the utrons near the outsides of his lower disk. The magnetic field near the outside while spinning them, denotes the electromagnetic collapse of magnetism toward the center -- in that field geometry.

This begs the question of the utrons being magnetic, whereas the outer electromagnets of the X1 collapse somehow in timing with the passing utrons, and a coil around the utrons could be built to handle that collapsed energy in polarity opposite of the utron-magnet, to deaden or cancel the utron's magnetic field in order to pass through the electromagnetic gate.

Aside from that complex structure, a homopolar motor design with electrostatic rotating disks may actually be able to handle rotating magnets spinning in the opposite direction of one of two counter-rotating field disks; it seems that the rotating magnetic fields are only traveling in one direction.

It's easy to see the device comprised of two capacitor sets, one on top (with lower rotating disk), and one on the bottom, with lower rotating disk with magnets. He is NOT using homopolar motor technology, and he's using an external Tesla coil power supply, instead of integrating that into his design, although it is using a conductive hollow "hat" similar to a Tesla tower. Also note the static disk, rather the disk that is not moving, with the frame "landing legs" sticking through it.

Note the bottom rotating disk is wider than the upper rotating disk, keeping to principles of the magnet and dielectric layers, using a wider magnet on bottom and on upper magnet, in less width, in adherence with the Townsend Brown in a vacuum test shown on the pdf file on the Construction page in the Townsend Brown section.

Part of it is powered through a Tesla resonance coil.

Here are some of Alexey's comments:

"A new lightening disk was made and a video was shot. But someone influential complained and yutub blocked the roller. But one user managed to download and reapply but again called feykovy flight. He decided that if the terminal with akamulyatora removed means fake. But I explained that from time to time you need to remove the power from the TDX to prevent the magnetization of the disks and prevent the subsidence of the parameters. If you have not seen the movie, I'll throw the link."

Here, we see the same metal on this video, which is not a YouTube video:

https://thexvid.com/video/_LZ0-dQxKwI/%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8-%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0-%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5.html

Okay, here's the YouTube video of the above link:

Notice how those can resemble OTC-X1 central rotating disk segments ??? Check out the cheat sheet on the article below . . .

Following his research, you can see more about the field flows here:

AND ... BAM! Found the type of metal he's using:

"This corrugated aluminum with an anodized coating structure similar to the beetle fenders. So successfully coincided."

Guess I need to mention Alexey mentioned in a comment on one of his bug wing videos what the material is -- the anodized corrugated aluminum. I spent hours translating Russian into English and searching.

This represents the first successful testing of the rotating and counter-rotating charge antigravity craft, able to lift a considerable amount of weight, and when applied in an air-tight resonance cavity hull may also work in a vacuum.

So now we know that the rotating and counter-rotating charge principle of physics DOES WORK.

PART II

I want to take some still-shots of the videos, and notes, to have a photo reference, just in case, because Alexey mentioned that his prior videos were removed from YouTube in order to suppress the technology.

He uses modified high voltage power supply from switching power supply for his original test. The first disk is powered up using a standard motor, plugged into a wall socket (power strip) which gets it to spin, as is the second disk. The disks are mounted to stationary frame (stationary disk), which the two motors are bolted to. The disks are arranged as capacitors, so the presence of unmoving disks in the engine will not cause it not to work.

After the two disks (the one on the very bottom, and the second one from the top) are spinning in opposite directions, most definitely. You can adjust your video settings for high quality to see better. The next step is to connect the high voltage power supply (after all, as I've said before, all forms of electrogravity use high voltage). In the OTC-X1, that is achieved through high volt flyback from the electromagnets.

Okay. The high voltage is plugged into the stationary disks by the looks of things, and the rotating disks picks up one polarity of the dielectric charges, but both stationary disks are on top of the rotating disks, so the orientation typically used is positive up and negative on bottom. If using positive on the bottom, it would be repulsive to the Earth surface charge, and not achieve significant height, in my opinion.

The orientation of negative on bottom and positive on top effectively means that the co-counter-rotating disks are spinning positive against negative, looking at this in the form of capacitor geometry. His high voltage source is the typical high voltage transformer from a CRT tube and improvised voltage multiplier (positive energy high volts, just like most people do with their electrostatic lifters). You can hear the zzzzzaping when he plugs in the voltage multiplier.

High voltage supply is the box in the middle photo. Multiplier is the hand-held device on the floor in the right photo.

He says the high voltage performs the "magnetization of sectors." It's in Russian, but there is an English translation.

Voltage and speed (inertial frequency).

The bottom left is levitating. Bottom middle is side profile. Bottom right is the bottom of the engine, and those are the 6 neodymium magnets.

PART III

Okay so here is the successful test model version 2.

The mess on the left is the power supply. Tesla resonance transformer, and immediately to its right is the power supply for it. The box on the far right is the independent power supply for the transformer block, and the little white box on top of the big white box is the high volt power supply. It's all connected to the 12 volt battery. I'm recording this for posterity, just in case.

Alexey continues to explain that a conflict of sequences steps caused his previous model to fall down, and he has to do a lot of fancy adjustments to get the craft to go up in the air, and sometimes it may take 30 minutes to balance everything correctly. Basically he explains that his power supply system has to be charged up in a certain order, probably due to resonance, like how a capacitor has to be charged first in a basic LC circuit (see the article below), and then when resonance starts to break down, he needs to provide an input to the capacitors, but it ends up going to the wrong place (the transformer instead of the capacitors), and his high voltage signal starts to degrade.

I don't want to speculate here too much about his power system, though. Not yet.

The second device, his working prototype is impressive, and obviously upgraded from the first, yet still having the same overall characteristics, and using better field geometry.

We know now that he is using corrugated aluminum with an anodized coating, which was the same material he used for the CSE beetle (sound resonance cavity) experiments, from the Russian etymologist years ago who discovered that effect. The piece he is touching is the upper rotating disk. This is awesome! It's like a TR-3B engine (1 of 3 on the triangular hull's tips). Just think how this style can be adopted to use a homopolar motor design instead of dipole standard electric motors.

Here below is a better view of the whole top. The special field is theorized in different ways. One theory is a positive and negative electrical mass cancellation. Otherwise it's not very well known how it works to be honest. If you consider electromagnetic spin reverses on either side, up and down, left and right within orientation to electric fields relative to a plane of gravity, then the spin one way and spin the other way seems to cancel gravity, along the middle and much wider disk plane.

Magnets are involved, however. In fact, the article below this one showing the little diagram of the outer electromagnets in homopolar motor configuration spinning two disks in opposite directions is similar but I REALLY LOVE the concept of the centralized wider disk in Alexey's application. Similar to magneto-electrostatic, or just static electricity with the two counter-rotating disks creating electrostatic friction on the central wide disk. The two rotating disks appear similar in size.

If you notice also where the high volt top disk is, it is connected via frame to the central disk, but later on it shows Alexey touching the legs of the device during levitation, and touching the bottom middle.

He uses three wires: one high volt from the Tesla resonance transformer, and two wires from the rotating disks. I would say he is using a homopolar motor design in this version, due to only two wires to handle the rotating disks, and the third as the high volt magneto-electrostatic feed.

. . .

Here is the best profile shot I could capture. You can see the wide disk, landing struts (frame), a tiny sliver of the top rotor disk, and the bottom rotor disk.

Note also in the bottom photos, a contact strip from the legs reaching out to touch the rotating bottom disk area, probably to transfer the charge, as a brush.

It does not look like there are magnets on the bottom of the disk, though.

It looks like the magnet is above the lower disk, and if you think about a homopolar motor, then it would seem to act in just that way.

So there you have it!

Different styles and designs. Makes me wonder about the OTC-X1 now -- counter-rotating electromagnetic field versus counter-rotating electrostatic disk.

Make sure you click on the images to magnify them and see the whole image.

PART IV

So we have a successful flight test, on two occasions (original model and remake), which looks fairly legitimate; and although Alexey didn't get his camera up close to his craft as it was levitating so we could get a really good super close inspection of it (he may be wanting to keep some proprietary secrets, who knows), at the very least it is demonstrating a familiar geometry:

A rotating electrostatic disk, in counter rotation to a rotating magnetic and electric disk. The lower disk is separating the magnetic and the electric aspects (rotating magnetic field, coinciding with a rotating electrostatic field) in BOTH designs of his. The upper disk remains a constant variable, but the shape of the engine itself has changed (which is okay).

His power system is many times larger than his test craft. The OTC-X1 however includes a potentially self-contained power system in its design, which is why we favor the OTC-X1 for the ultimate craft, yet engines like Alexey's are favored in the testing phase to understand the physics and the power systems.

Yet, we still need to understand how the OTC-X1 works, and Alexey's design is a practical application toward achieving this goal.

From the articles below, we can see how all these systems co-relate, and there is a pattern:

Counter-rotation of electromagnetic and electrostatic rings / disks. There must be a magnet involved, and there must be electrostatic involved, and high voltage, but we can simplify the energy requirements using flyback from the collapse of the electromagnetic coils, while also using those electromagnetic coils as our rotating magnets. After all, a homopolar motor will work in many combinations, in both two-piece and one-piece dynamics.

The utrons also double as rotating magnets, and static field generators. The utrons are in the same place as Alexey's original experimental device, 6 of them around the perimeter, but are oriented along the 45 degree inclination / intercept; and we have some comfortable spacing in between the OTC-X1 components for timing the engine pulses and collapses.

The OTC-X1 blends Searl and Alexey Chekurkov designs.

I would like to open up the Comments field at this point, to gain some much-needed feedback from others about any ideas and discoveries and tests that can be brought to the table of our common goals.

I want to hit some basic highlights however, just to make it easier for the newbies to do a search on.

Highlights:

1) There has to be a magnet to get the device to spin, but the unifying principle seems to be co-counter-rotating electrostatic high voltage disks. (although rotating electromagnetic fields can be intrinsic)

Sources of high voltage:

Capacitance and flyback (utron kinda remind me of doornob capacitors). Utrons act as high volt capacitors.

Don't discount the central accumulator from being able to store high volt capacitance from the flyback. It's strange gotta admit. Capacitance would help raise frequency otherwise there would be a pulsed mechanical frequency that needs to be raised thru resonance and capacitance.

2) I mentioned i'm going to use an induction coil for some tests.. and I got to thinking one big coil could equal a bunch of smaller coils but would still need capacitance to equal what one big coil can do.

3) It would not be a stretch at this point to consider the OTC-X1 as a flying induction coil. If you eliminate the complex scalar warp drive physics and just stick to engineering, one could make better sense of all this mess from doing some creative experiments.

The one noteworthy thing about the utron / accumulator 45 degree cone shapes tho is the intersection of parallel / longitudinal electric and transverse magnetic fields. THAT is probably the ONLY reason they are significant.

4) THAT is what scalar energy is about. Actually no that's what NEGATIVE energy is about. Without that component there's no guarantee it will warp time ... and furthermore cones within cones may make a better crystal power cell electret material alignment in the central accumulator than flat plates in the accumulator.

That means there will be a mini utron-shaped hollow cavity inside the central accumulator.

That also might be the reason the X1 is able to hold its own self-regenerating overunity power system.

Each interior cone segment can have individual electret "sticks" arranged in cone shape too, basically sub-dividing each cone section so the electret material can be better electrified/magnetized.

5) This from Matt Tracy ... in regard to Bismuth and Aluminum alloy in Roswell crash - Arts parts:

"Now I do know that both bismuth and aluminum are paramagnetic. And i also know that bismuth has two very interesting qualities to say the least. Bismuth when flattened to 5-microns or less becomes naturally superconductive at room temperature. Bismuth's second amazing quality is that it is naturally at the atomic scale has an asymmetrical atomic geometry. And we know that it requires asymmetry in the dielectric field to produce a counter wave to asymmetrical dielectric fractal emission that we we ignorantly call gravity."

Aluminum anodized with bismuth is a good idea. I also know of bismuth becoming superconductive in small slivers. Graphite too has similar properties in thin wafers. Diamagnetic or something if memory serves. Able to reflect the magnetic field perfectly to hover a magnet over it.

UPDATE: there is no need for bismuth since a rotating aluminum disk acts diamagnetically upon a magnet, reflecting the magnet's poles.

6) Also ... just because a system may be generating negative energy, it does NOT mean a system is reducing mass, and suddenly a large craft has nill inertia. These are specific fields and the only way to explain them is to show their relationship with action.

If something has no inertia, that is a local field effect and due to a field effect. By now, everyone knows how UFO and TR-3B craft move in their sudden accelerations and right angled turns that don't squish the pilots.

But an electromagnetic field collapse does not make the coil weigh less; but if that force can be harnessed in scalar ways in high frequency, in a perpetual energy of collapse without it filling up, and thus increasing energy output, THEN it's something.

And even tho Stephen Hawking says the total energy of the universe is zero due to negative and positive energy, it does not mean that negative energy is the absence of energy. That is a dumbass assumption.

And I really apologize to those still stuck thinking that opposing fields cancel mass when opposing fields only cancel energy output to zero and they're not even able to get a basic generator to work because they wind their coils in opposition. I don't know what to tell those people who absolutely lack and practical experience and have never wound a coil in their life.

I'm just very careful not to call flyback voltage negative energy, because if it's not overunity, it's not necessarily negative energy. It may have its BASIS in the collapse of an electromagnetic field, BUT it's more complex than that. I recommend reading the website to gain an understanding of it. Some of you absolutely refuse to read the website because you have to READ it, and instead find it easier to peg me with a whole lot of questions that take up my time to be building stuff.

And technically speaking, it's not negative energy that provides the whopping load of voltage, but with very tiny amps. You can GET amps out of it though, which is a complex manner to do so, requiring secondary effects. Negative energy provides amplification, overunity, and in additional configuration mass reduction, but that additional configuration is a complex system that is only theory right now until we can measure it against a clock.

ADDITIONALLY: Apparently the TR-3B is canceling out inertia and gravity and increasing the frequency of time ONLY and JUST THROUGH THE MECHANISM of running high voltage along its hull ... and there's NO NEGATIVE ENERGY INVOLVED WHATSOEVER! ...... This can be used in space then packing the air along with the craft in double-hull configuration, in circulation fields.

As the Alex Flying Craft shows, there is not an ion wind effect of lift as a thrust, because the engine is not designed to use that principle! It's demonstrating come kind of static lift but, not ionic thrust. These physics could just be completely simplified at this point, and go back to how it was on the Warp Drive Engineering page which never once got into negative energy, and only dealt with high volts. I am however convinced that there is a special secret with negative energy, in that an overunity power supply as well as high volts can be obtained through a MUCH smaller generator deriving energy from the electromagnetic collapse.

For those who don't know what a "TR-3B" is, here are some photos:

7) And finally regarding spin... a photon has spin of one whole whereas matter has spin of 1/2. The addition of -1/2 + 1/2 is not zero, but is a 1. Matter and antimatter combine as light, not as zero (as void) as Stephen Hawking would have us believe. (he said the total energy of the universe is zero due to positive and negative energy)

This is why magneto-electrostatic spin and counter-spin cancel inertial mass. Light does not take time to travel; it is a static field throughout All. Only matter experiences time.

8) Regarding negative gravitation:

According to the TR-3B patent (https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en), electron inertia moves forward on the ship, pulling the ship along with it, creating a gravitational force of moving electrons, moving in parallel to the inertia of the moving electron mass. FREQUENCY SEEMS TO BE THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR, when pertaining to electron mass, gravitation, and inertial VIBRATION (and polarity).

Negative gravitation as it pertains to the OTC-X1 very well may be throwing electrons out to the sides, creating a force of negative gravitation in the center, and positive gravity around the hull, negating the local gravity fields of star systems or planets in that polarity of active inertia.

As I stated in the article below, for some reason I had it in my head that the electrons gathered toward the Accumulator, creating a positive force of gravitation there which negated the gravity fields of surrounding local planets and star system fields. .... This needs to be noted.

At this point, I'm not seeing anything new come up; some people are suggesting the same things I've already suggested and discussed. We seem to be on the same page at least ..

At this point EVERYTHING has been taken into account regarding the OTC-X1 analysis and probabilities, and thoroughly discussed, so that the last step remains is to build it BECAUSE WE SEE due to the Alex Flying Craft, that THESE PRINCIPLES DO INDEED WORK!

It's time to build, and put it to the test to see what works, and what can work, and what doesn't do too well.

PART V

Theory Update from the Comments (peer consensus)

(I'm only including a few highlights, because a lot has been discussed, and the good parts unfortunately were not in the comments; but at least it's practical info):

--UPDATED--

It was explained to me that it is not real physics, unless there is either A) mathematics to explain it, or otherwise B) an explanation on how it works. ... It was also explained to me that it is not proof unless there is only mathematics, that a demonstration of a working device is NOT considered proof. <--- What's wrong with that picture?? Yes, someone REALLY told me that, and was quite fervent about it.

Sorry but a working device is proof of concept. Consider it the art of science.

Here's the explanation, AND the

Unifying Theory of the Creation of Gravitation:

Background of Tesla physics involving DC pulse:

DC pulse is only responsible for arresting the electrons from moving: pulsing the voltage, basically opening the circuit back up before the electrons has any time to gain momentum and begin moving (an electromagnetic field can collapse at light speed). Electrons are only good for creating losses, they absorb the energy being suddenly drawn in by the circuit from the surrounding environment. Electrons moving creates the heat in the circuit. That's why pulsed DC VOLTAGE (Impulse Flyback Waves) has no heat and no amps in the circuit -- only if harnessing flyback thru a spark gap. Otherwise an induction coil gets hot from the pumping electromagnet.

DC High Voltage is being pulsed at varying frequency (high or low), but the CURRENT is not being pushed.

-- The output can occur at the speed of light.

DC high volt pulses at high frequency impulse (wave characteristic), is the electrical aspect that aligns the quantum spin and energy forces in polarity without regard to mass (electron mass). This has an inversely proportional characteristic between energy, frequency, and mass.

Instead of harnessing electron mass, it is the harnessing of the frequency of electron (electrical) energy, as well as spin polarity, similar to Dr. Ning Li's "AC Gravity" device, which is now quite popular, and that concept is being used by other experimental physics groups and companies.

The similarity to her device is that the things that are spinning are not being allowed to move, but are locked in place (similar to the Bose-Einstein condensate), but the electrons are the things that are spinning at this point. The energy of their mass is directly transferred through spin, through the electromagnetic field (displacement of mass and energy).

It is seen that energy itself can move superconductively in the Eric Dollard experiments. If that energy displaces the electron mass, then as the energy reaches higher voltage and higher frequency, the amps can drop into the negative range -- the mass of the electrons (an electron is a paradoxical particle; not considered a physical object) drop to zero, because mass is not what is building up the energy.

. . .

"A homopolar motor works because a one charge is placed on the paramagnetic disc. One thing you need to change in your understanding of charges is that all electrical charges is nothing more then spin. All positive charges spin in one direction while all negative charges spin in the opposite direction. It's all about spin and spin direction.

If it is so that two counter rotating dielectric fields are required to achieve electro-gravitic flight, then from a scientific standpoint point that which we call gravity must be a dielectric field effect. Otherwise a dielectric field should have no effect on gravity if there is no fundamental connection between the supposed two forces. In all described electro-gravitic craft, there is a dance between two separate fields -- one rotating in a counter direction to the other." [This can be seen as the proton spin of positive charge and the electron spin of negative charge, whereas changing the spin frequency and voltage of the protons and electrons in the material of the rotating disk is caused by induction]

"When the field that is rotating in the same direction as the earth's field, it is stronger then the opposing field, IE negative on negative, the ship is repelled away from the earth's surface. When the field that rotates counter to the earth's dielectric field is stronger, IE positive field, the craft is pulled towards the surface of the earth. The difference between these two counter rotating fields allow us to control the ship's altitude and at what rate of speed the ship achieves that altitude. So it stands to reason that the force that we erroneously refer to as gravity must be nothing more the a dielectric field effect occurring between two counter rotating fields."

-- quantum spin polarity is "rotation" in this case, and yet a physical rotation on the disk must also and therefore be present, if the quantum universe truly represents the physical universe of motion, inertia, frequency, energy, and spin, etc. This is to say that "macro" and "micro" realities are not backwards from each other as quantum mechanics appears to be, but is instead not involving mass -- the very thing that is relevant to gravity, time, and the speed of light.

Most physicists will say "oh, that's hogwash; that cannot exist." I've heard it said for 20 years, and after a point, you tend to want to go along with the crowd, YET CLEARLY this exists due to the Alex Flying Device, as well as Dr. Ning Li's device (now duplicated by other labs) -- quantum reality can exist unified in the micro AND macro reality through a unification of frequency (of time as that which is not source, but is the prime energy of the universe).

The outward dielectric and magnetic waves by the nature of their movement thru time, they create a counter polarity - a return wave through counter-space as you put it, which when that wave is harnessed, then the two flows can adjust the entire "reality" of that body of lets call it: gravitational capacitance - the gravity-time zone of our star system from Earth point of view.

How this applies: The two charged disks rotate at particular set speeds to create a standing-wave frequency which sets the "time flow" between di-electric spins (in angular alignment); the standing wave frequency is the frequency of time, which is a radiant field. See how this then has an effect on mass and gravity?

Ok. And so that can be controlled by controlling the special electromagnetic energy of the two disks OR of the one disk with outer counter-electromagnetic spin of the electromagnets.

That controls "gravity-time" ... in a negative electromagnetic field.

~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~

Here is a rather well-seen image these days

This is the design style of the Haunebu II

Things to note:

Spinning disks with magnets also spinning . . . a big resonance coil through the middle ... The bottom is generating power .. similar to the OTC-X1 ... And then there are capacitor layers in the hull.

Flight control pods underneath, which would make it much easier to control than how Alexey made his two-disk device.

This also includes Townsend Brown's (Bifeld-Brown) effect (Can use electret di-electric material) in the case of the non-spinning disks. Regardless and also, the spin polarity of electron mass displacement (contained in lattice) through rotating disks, and the static disk sections around the hull.

Also ceramic / magnetic layers can be used for a dielectric insulator.

Lateral movement is suggested to apply a high volt charge from center of hull / disk layers to the outside perimeter of the hull edge, in the direction one wishes to travel.

Radiation Shielding:

A brief note here. At having zero inertia, no resistance to motion, and no reaction to other nearby gravitational and acceleration forces, which is equivalent to having zero mass, it is the paradox of having a LOT of mass to shield from radiation.

At high frequency and high voltage, a hull within a zero inertial/mass gravitation field would not give radioactive static currents (high frequency ray energy having inertia)* any mass with which to energetically interact; and an electrified hull should be able to shield from high frequency rays -- a high frequency negative energy Faraday cage.

*Static current is not a duality, it is a paradox and so in opposition to itself, it unifies as a higher form basically, instead of negating its own existence. For example as high voltage is pulsed through an open circuit (capacitor plates, spark gap, etc), then this can preserve a type of static buildup throughout the entire conductive and working field generators (coils, capacitor plates, spark gaps, etc).

The voltage will flow, as it takes a moment to charge any system, and so the voltage fills out the spaces as it moves, but it is not considered current. Voltage jumps or voltage potential increases can mitigate its wave-forms (longitudinal or electromagnetic) traveling faster than what resistance is provided in a current.

... Regarding the concept of inertia, even light has inertia through timelines; having an inertia to manifest into the universe; reality has the inertia to move forward through seeming continuity. Inertia unifies ultimately even at the level of consciousness having inertia to act, and each action carries with it the inertia of purpose.

There is much about light that is involved here.

Furthermore, electro-inertia is different from electro-gravitation. Electro-gravitation involves the frequencies of time within a gravitational field in that way, to create the gravity field. Electro-inertia is the impetus for inertial force, be it thrust or lift, and can withstand Newtonian scrutiny.

Within electro-gravitation, electro-inertia can be applied to move a craft around quickly, without having resistance to motion (inertia). An example of electro-inertia is the Bifeld-Brown effect. An example of electro-gravitation is the OTC-X1 and the Alex Flying Device.

PART VI

Follow Up:

Alexey Posts another video of his Flying Machine!

Here is another video of the Alex Flying machine in which a Russian colleague criticizes his engine, not realizing there are TWO DISKS that Counter-rotate ... and not understanding the nature of the resonance involved with Alexey's Tesla system as to why the craft falls suddenly, which forces Alexey to make ANOTHER VIDEO, showing him lift it off and ungracefully land it on his living room floor.
It's all in Russian, so skip around for the good parts.

You can tell it's a bit beat up from the hard landing last time. Adjust your video quality for best viewing.

Thank you, Alexey Chekurkov for making this and sharing it with the world, and for showing the side profile!

Brilliant idea to make the one disk as the accretion disk between the two smaller spinners.

Brilliant! Three wires!

There is some never-before-seen force involved here, and it's probably something akin to a Torsion Field.

Theory explaining it: above in Part V.

Once again, the comment section is open in this article for finalizing design specifications to gain some much-needed feedback from others about any ideas and discoveries and tests that can be brought to the table of our common goals.

I will add one more thing. The commenter below is correct about an ultra-sonic generator. Take a look at this and follow the link on the bottom of this article: https://www.warp-drive-physics.com/updates-and-design-improvements/biefeld-brown-electret-dielectric-and-some-logistics-for-development

And please forgive my rant about funding....

73 Comments

mitch

8/7/2018 07:52:47 pm

A bit of history...

Mitch
8/7/2018 05:35:11 pm

I want to converse more about the OTC X-1 project. I believe doing it thru a comment section will be the most transparent disclosure for the others. Please direct me to a more viewed page comment section to accomplish this.

BTW. Last year I completed a scale manufacture of 6 armatures/coils, a freely rotating 12" diameter center disk with the 6 cap plates, assembled on a lower hull that is stationary for now. I also constructed one peripheral solid utron of aluminum that is coil wound and has been tested. (energized and readings taken to show magnetic flux direction at orderly spacing around the locus.
Also last year:
My #1 stated goal of rotation as a motor has been completed (ext pwr ok), but by an incorrect method. But Hey! I wanted to see it spin. I went with a 120Hz AC external capacitor resonant tank circuit using the armature coils, switched on by a rotating center contactor to energize the coils at a location of the armature starting from the center of the cap plate until just before exiting the armature.
Method: Repelling it paramagnetically. It worked, but was an inefficient pig. Obviously not what was done by the designers.
I believe the disk propulsion is as a unipolar motor. Agree?

So, Let me know what page I should use the comment section for best results.. There is more to tell. Some, I see you haven't discovered/posted.

LAU
8/7/2018 06:35:27 pm

The top article on this page, the "Antigravity demonstration ... from Russia" article is getting a LOT of views AND likes! I can even write a bit directing viewers toward the comment section. A comparison / analysis of the style of Alexey's and the OTC-X1 is inevitable.

Mitch

8/7/2018 08:43:20 pm

Lau, I found the page.

I would like to make a list of the X-1 modes of operation for you to add/refute.

1. Operate in the atmosphere (at least) using counter rotating gyroscopic action to anchor (Inertial ground) then control itself in another inertial frame of reference resulting in apparent flight. No? The physics would be powered by the giant segmented monopolar motor that makes up the majority of the craft.

2. Reverse #1. and operate as a generator
a. to recharge center utron for some modes of operation. ie. slow rotation upon power off.
b. create High Voltage DC, Pulsing DC, or AC to enable other modes of operation.

3. Operate as a whirling electron gun. The heating of the capacitor ends when in use might be enough to be a fine cathode emitter.
Check out the pic, even looks like OTC.

https://www.quora.com/What-happen-if-someone-is-shot-by-electron-gun

The cap end can be packed with electrons using the monopolar generator in a electron flow out configuration with no return path. Heck perhaps the collapsing field in the peripheral utrons can provide a flyback to pump the cap ends with even more electrons. Doesn't this X-1 supposed to have a corona?

4.-X. Magnetoelectric bending of time/space, crystals, control by thought.... that seems to be more your realm, and down the road apiece.
As an (even) external powered monopolar motor spinning fast enough to find another inertial reference and appear weightless would be enough for me.....as a start.

What are your thoughts on the center utron? Are the following things true?
1. It is a power source.
2. It, both top and bottom, rotate with and are attached to the center capacitor disk.
3. The capacitor plates connect, or extend to the centermost layer of the Center Utron.
3. The geometric surface is encased in an aluminum skin as shown in full scale (35'dia craft) photos online.
4. Inside is stacks of power generating possibilities. (cap plates, battery electrode plates, crystals?)
5. Wrapped around the outer skin of the utron is a inductive coil. Top to center to bottom. (Wind direction from top unknown)

LAU

8/7/2018 11:34:41 pm

That's a pretty good summary of what we know, and what we suspect is true. High speed spin and high voltage is key as well. Mass of the disk is important. It is connected to the central accumulator; they spin together... and in fact, the magnetization of the central accumulator also is important (we can see that aspect playing a role in Alexey's machine). Central Accumulator is coiled either in two halves or one complete winding.

The outer electromagnets can't be too heavy but there needs to be enough windings for a beefy high volt flyback which has to be stored somewhere and to put to use. Alexey's engine had a good deal of resonance because it took a while to lose power to fall after battery disconnect. I would surmise that our utrons are our high volt capacitors. The central accumulator must also have capacitance, but I like the idea of crystal power cell material in layers within the central accumulator. If it has enough energy initially, then flyback high voltage could start building up in the system and loop back on itself maybe.

There's gotta be a spark gap somewhere too; that is a shortcut to charging the entire circuit with high volts.

In one of Carr's old videos, the hull was a different shape in that there were additional flat plates (disks) attached to the electromagnets, but they didn't extend all the way to the central accumulator -- they were like Alexey's small rotating disks but attached to the outside instead of the inside.

...

Getting the outer electromagnets to rotate, I've seen that happen on other models... but this is a limit - as close as we get - without asking the universe for help (building the device)...

Steven Chiverton link

3/27/2022 03:08:49 am

its a lot of reading here but theres an important question i have to ask
what waveforms is alex feeding into his experiment sine square waves or triangle waves or a mixture

Mitch

8/12/2018 04:08:36 pm

I want to share videos/drawings with you so I can bounce around ideas from a new perspective and move forward with the forensics of the X-1 and now interestingly this Russian HV rotating disk flying machine. It pisses me off so much that I am in a fight with my RUSSIAN girlfriend!!!!! She could translate it all! ARRRGH!
Should I get her a ring? JK
p.s. the past foretells the future.

LAU

8/7/2018 11:38:38 pm

It is possible that a thin magnet layer is sandwiched between the dielectrostatic disk (big homopolar motor disk; we it works like that), for added frequency to the voltage accross the big disk...

mitch

8/8/2018 03:49:33 pm

You wrote:
"In one of Carr's old videos, the hull was a different shape..."
I havent seen that one. It would be good for me to see one of the interim steps in his design. Please leave a link in a comment if you can find the site/video. Thanx

mitch

8/8/2018 03:58:45 pm

oops this comment should have been above. Still getting used to it

LAU

8/8/2018 04:59:16 pm

Sure, it can be found on the Otis T. Carr OTC-X1 Facebook page.

mitch

8/8/2018 04:44:17 pm

Is there a way for me to post/comment hand drawn design pics/ideas for you to see?

Center utron: Do you think it is a battery in the sense that the top cone is one polarity and the bottom cone is the other and they are separated by the structural material of the cap disk center layer? I did.
It could be a stack of disk electrodes with internal rods connecting every other plate so as to have a high capacity single voltage battery stack.
The rods could go thru the center layer of the cap disk to the other side as same to create a BIG capacity single voltage battery.( the connections could be at the top, bottom or above/below the equator of the utron )
Or the lower stack could be only connected to the top by one rod to create a utron that is say, positive voltage on top, negative at the bottom and neutral in the center. (allowing half voltage connections)
Think of it as two batteries in series connected + to - at the center.

OR... (this is my favorite) Think of two batteries in series connected - to - at the center. The top and bottom of the utron would be most positive, (like the hull) and the center 0. The stack would have no interconnecting rods, just a battery stack...but the large diameter electrodes at the equator would be huge area to create low voltage/high current power delivery. Just what is required for a monopolar motor, an electron emitter with heating, AND is is highly negative compared to the positive high voltage at the tips (hull connection) The smaller electrode plates at the tips is ok because the hull takes little current, it is electrostatic.
If the outer utrons work like I think they do then... I've said enough for now.
I need to show you drawings.

LAU

8/8/2018 05:21:07 pm

It is some sort of radiant energy collector thing the way Carr described it, and it was I think given to him by Tesla, or he somehow made that part early on, before even forming the team to build the OTC-X1.

But I think, if memory serves, that it was given to him by Tesla? Because he seemed to have to rebuild it and get the voltage right in the ones he and his team built for the OTC-X1. He described it as having an internalized lattice, as a type of battery or power cell, and it had to have enough voltage and output potential for the whole engine to start to work initially.

I already have some of that drawn below, Mitch. I do however think you are correct that the polarity should be - , - at the center, instead of +, + (although it can be +, -) .. because as I was reading up on the TR-3B patent, I noticed that the electron inertia (I had thought of this before, but this really set it home) creates a gravity field.

So if we're dealing with something that alters time (as Ralph Ring claimed), then it would be a collapse of mass, in a negative gravitation field, meaning that the electron inertia would have to gather at the Central Accumulator, creating that form of gravitation ... but I dunno. It could be the other way, too. and reversing gravity by throwing gravity out the sides, to create a negative gravitation, instead of a positive gravitation.

mitch

8/12/2018 04:55:48 pm

I'm responding to:
"LAU
8/8/2018 05:21:07 pm
It is some sort of radiant energy collector thing the way Carr described it..."
I agree. I think the radiant ( or free space) energy loop is pumped by the action of the electron current that is thrown out, up around and back in on the top.(All mirrored on the bottom.) The electron current flow demands that it create two toroidal magnetic fields above and below. One Field clockwise, the other counter.

I am all in, on the idea of the center disc throwing electrons out thru the dielectric field shaping outer ring of the craft. These particles would be accelerated by a.) the flow of electron current in the cap disks (monopolar), b.) the centrifugal force throwing electrons like a pro league pitcher (electrons are small but still have mass.) c.) High voltage positively charged hull in a decreasing Z per X distance. (i.e. electron gun)

I think you are right in the - to + connection of the center of the utron.
Not the minus terminal of a battery with a hv + top center connected to a plus terminal of a battery with a hv - bottom.
I picture a utron with +HV on top, +HV on bottom (connected by the hull) and a low voltage + and - between the center disk structure plate. ( to power the monopolar M)

LAU

8/8/2018 10:49:36 am

Guess I need to mention Alexey mentioned in a comment on one of his bug wing videos what the material is -- the anodixed corrugated aluminum. I spent hours translating Russian into English and searching.

mitch

8/9/2018 04:33:57 pm

I just watched the Russians video. If that's for real (#3 accomplished, he even used a stick above and around it!) then it's going to be easy and we've been working too hard. His workmanship is mediocre and it still seems to work! He is NOT even rotating his disks to the high proportional speeds that RR calculated for smaller than Earth craft.
No utrons, nice and simple. Just lift. What do you see? I see low mass counter rotating ( slow) dimpled conductive disks used as a high voltage (AC Frequency?) capacitor plate, possibly throwing electrons into the atmosphere in the horizontal plane. Possibly creating two electron current loops that goes out, one up/ one down and back in the top/bottom. (toroidal) ( is this what he main disk does in the X-1?)
These disks also power the rotation of an array of equally spaced toroidal magnetic fields.( they are disk magnets with a hole?) (are these our armatures?)

LAU

8/8/2018 11:09:50 am

There has to be a magnet to get the device to spin, but the unifying principle seems to be co-counter-rotating electrostatic high voltage disks.

Sources of high voltage:

Capacitance and flyback (utron kinda remind me of doornob capacitors). Don't discount the central accumulator from being able to store high volt capacitance from the flyback. It's strange gotta admit. Capacitance would help raise frequency otherwise there would be a pulsed mechanical frequency that needs to be raised thru resonance and capacitance.

LAU

8/8/2018 11:22:33 am

I mentioned i'm going to use an induction coil for some tests.. and I got to thinking one big coil could equal a bunch of smaller coils but would still need capacitance to equal what one big coil can do.

And there's still a matter of getting the outer electromagnets to counter-spin. I think thats the other mechanical aspect the utrons play as repulsive electromagnets (or even push-pull AC style). Carr said they act as coils, too.

LAU

8/8/2018 11:36:11 am

It would not be a stretch at this point to consider the OTC-X1 as a flying induction coil. If you eliminate the complex scalar warp drive physics and just stick to engineering, one could make better sense of all this mess from doing some creative experiments.

The one noteworthy thing about the utron / accumulator 45 degree cone shapes tho is the intersection of parallel / longitudinal electric and transverse magnetic fields. THAT is probably the ONLY reason they are significant.

LAU

8/8/2018 11:46:28 am

THAT is what scalar energy is about. Actually no thats what NEGATIVE energy is about. Without that component there's no guarantee it will warp time ... and furthermore cones within cones may make a better crystal power cell electret material alignment in the central accumulator than flat plates in the accumulator.

That means there will be a mini utron-shaped hollow cavity inside the central accumulator.

That also might be the reason the X1 is able to hold its own self-regenerating overunity power system.

Each interior cone segment can have individual electret "sticks" arranged in cone shape too.

LAU

8/8/2018 11:54:51 am

This from Matt Tracy ... in regard to Bizmuth and Aluminum alloy in Roswell crash - Arts parts:

"Now I do know that both bismuth and aluminum are peramagnetic. And i also know that bismuth has two very interesting qualities to say the least. Bismuth when flattened to 5-microns or less becomes naturally supperconductive at room temperature. Bismuth's second amazing quality is that it is naturally at the atomic scale has an asymmetrical atomic geometry. And we know that it requires asymmetry in the dielectric field to produce a counter wave to asymmetrical dielectric fractal emission that we we ignorantly call gravity."

"

LAU

8/8/2018 11:59:40 am

Aluminum anodized with bizmuth is a good idea. I also know of bizmuth becoming superconductive in small slivers. Graphite too has similar properties in thin wafers. Diamagnetic or something if memory serves. Able to reflect the magnetic field perfectly to hover a magnet over it.

LAU

8/8/2018 04:28:19 pm

Also ... just because a system may be generating negative energy, it does NOT mean a system is reducing mass, and suddenly a large craft has nill inertia. These are specific fields and the only way to explain them is to show their relationship with action.

If something has no inertia, that is a local field effect and due to a field effect. By now, everyone knows how UFO and TR-3B craft move in their sudden accelerations and right angled turns that don't squish the pilots.

But an electromagnetic field collapse does not make the coil weigh less; but if that force can be harnessed in scalar ways in high frequency, in a perpetual energy of collapse without it filling up, and thus increasing energy output then it's something.

And even tho Stephen Hawking says the total energy of the universe is zero due to negative and positive energy, it does not mean that negative energy is the absence of energy. That is a dumbass assumption.

And I really apologize to those still stuck thinking that opposing fields cancel mass when opposing fields only cancel energy output to zero and they're not even able to get a basic generator to work because they wind their coils in opposition. I don't know what to tell those people who absolutely lack and practical experience and have never wound a coil in their life.

LAU

8/8/2018 04:45:46 pm

And finally regarding spin... a photon has spin of one whole whereas matter has spin of 1/2. The addition of -1/2 + 1/2 is not zero, but is a 1. Matter and antimatter combine as light, not as zero (as void) as Stephen Hawking would have us believe.

This is why magneto-electrostatic spin and counter-spin cancel inertial mass. Light does not take time to travel; it is a static field throughout All. Only matter experiences time.

LAU

8/13/2018 02:47:10 pm

ok guys I'm reading a book by Ken Wheeler and I saw his videos on antigravity, and you're gonna kick yourselves unless you already know what's going on. the central accumulator is for horizontal movement. it's a magnet with the highly charged dialectric material adjacent to its dialectric inertial plane. with the RHR for motors, this gives us horizontal force. controlling the relative charge on the dialectric plates produces a force in a horizontal direction. the utrons themselves provide a force in a direction either down and inwards or up and outwards. the horizontal component doesn't seem to matter, as aluminum is paramagnetic and therefore I don't see any possible interactions between it and the intersection of the centripetal nodes of the magnetic fields. what is meant by 4 dimensional thinking is simply subject/ object interactions through the fields that are created via perturbations of the ether.

- from Billy Griffin

LAU

8/13/2018 03:15:37 pm

Drew Dowling think about this. If it is so that two counter rotating dielectric fields are required to achieve electro gravitic flight, then from a scientific standpoint point that which we call gravity must be a dielectric field effect. Other wise a dielectric field should have no effect on gravity if there is no fundamental connection between the supposed two forces. In all described electro gravitic craft, there is a dance between two separate fields. One rotating in a counter direction to the other. When the field that is rotating in the same direction as the earth's field is stronger then the opposing field, ie negative on negative, the ship is repelled away from the earth's surface. When the field that rotates counter to the earth's dielectric field is stronger, ie positive field, the craft is pulled towards the surface of the earth. The difference between these two counter rotating fields allow us to control the ship's altitute and at what rate of speed the ship achieves that altitude. So it stands to reason that the force that we erroneously reffer to as gravity must be nothing more the a dielectric field effect occurring between to counter rotating fields.

- Matt Tracy

LAU

8/15/2018 11:52:22 am

Billy Griffin. There's a lot of things I never would have figured out without help, and without finding people to mentor me.

You got a lot of things going on with the utron. I consider them field generators and capacitors. Note angular inertia is involved with them. And there's other things going on with them, other possibilities to their function.

We know a few things about the engine. It spins so it acts as a homopolar motor, and there are a few ways that can work. But the dielectric plates serve that role to make the motor spin. The plates can be enhanced in several ways to make the most of our physics.

We know high volts is rewuired so we know the electromagnets collapse at some point and pulse. They can't collapse over the plates because the plates cause the motion wired positive to the inside and negative to the outside of the disk. See the Construction Blog page (the blog page).

So they have to be collapsing either in the space between the disks and utron, or over the utron.

...

The central accumulator provides power and with magnetic housing can apply a magnetic field for resonance. Filled with electret material (see the Construction blog page) then we can make use of the Bifeld-Brown effect as long as high volts go thru the resonance coil the central accumulator is wound in.

The utrons get charged with high volts from the collapsing electromagnets powered from central accumulator.

Picture an LC tank circuit where the coils are wired in parallel with the capacitors.

The novelty here is that the utrons resonate with the electromagnets physically as well.

L = electromagnet; C= capacitor. Its not quite the same as a tank circuit because you also have mechanical motion. Bedini resonance circuit is the closest match to known tech easy to use and understand (they make kits for Bedini engines).

Get the system to resonate, back feeding thru the capacitors (utrons) to the resonance coil around the central accumulator) .. but these circuits have to be isolated and connect together only thru electromagnetic resonance to build up energy and high volts.

When the central accumulator gets high volt resonance, those high volts feed thru the dielectric plates and the whole thing cycles and builds up as the disk spins faster and electromagnets pulse quicker.

DC high volt pulse is responsible for tweaking electron mass for an electron-inertia-gravitation phenomenon.

LAU

8/15/2018 11:56:30 am

Billy Griffin there is no positive and negative on each utron. That is wrong. They are considered each as one plate of a capacitor. So each outer utron must by all negatively charged while the inner larger unit is entirely positively charged, all with high voltages and at absolutely zero amps.

From Matt Tracy

LAU

8/15/2018 12:08:25 pm

What Matt Tracy said about central accumulator positive and utrons negative is the essence of negative energy. Also that is found on all those wiring schematic details on the Construction blog page.

How to wire it is what those schematics show and explain.

Yes. There are people who are trying to figure out the OTC-X1 without any knowledge at all, and without using their resources to learn it. They want to figure it out from scratch, meanwhile this huge resource exists which explains things.

LAU

8/15/2018 12:24:16 pm

Billy Griffin think about it this way. A homopolar motor works because a one charge is placed on the paramagnetic disc. That one charge, either positive or negative, has a spin in one direction while the mager on the outer rim has two spins. The magnet has both a positive and a negative spin acting against each other to create the magnetic field. Now the one charge placed on the discs will both repel against its like spin and and move in the direction of its opposing spin, thus making the physical disc itself spin once a high voltage charge is applied. One thing you need to change in your understanding of charges is that all electrical charges is nothing more then spin. All positive charges spin on one direction while all negative charges spin in the opposite direction. It's all about spin and spin direction.

From Matt Tracy

LAU

8/15/2018 01:25:12 pm

Drew Dowling DC pulse is only responsible for arresting the electrons from moving. Pulsing the current, basically opening the circuit back up before the electrons has any time to gain momentum and begin moving. Electron are only good for creating losses, they absorb the energy being suddenly drawn in by the circuit from the surrounding environment. Electrons moving creates the heat in the circuit. That's why pulsed DC current has no heat and no amps in the circuit.

Matt Tracy, only if harnessing flyback thru a spark gap. Otherwise an induction coil gets hot from the pumping electromagnet.

LAU

8/15/2018 01:28:12 pm

Drew Dowling I'm telling you man, heat can only occur when electrons are allowed to gain any amount of momentum. If you're having heat in your circuit, no matter the source of the pulses, then you're not pulsing the circuit fast enough to arrest the electrons from gaining movement.

From Matt T.

LAU

8/15/2018 01:36:35 pm

What's weird tho.. if its not electron mass that is harnessing gravitation, which apparently it's not ... then how does mass play its role in gravitation?

LAU

8/15/2018 02:09:23 pm

I think I see what you're saying tho... the outward dielectric and magnetic waves by the nature of their movement thru time, they create a counter polarity - a return wave through counter-space as you put it, which when that wave is harnessed, then the two flows can adjust the entire "reality" of that body of lets call it: gravitational capacitance - the gravity-time zone of our star system from Earth point of view.

mitch

8/16/2018 07:46:41 pm

Check out: "The Capacitance Theory of Gravity" by Morton Spears
I worked with him for the two books and NASA presentation.

Gleem

10/17/2018 02:03:18 am

Mitch I am very interested in learning more about the NASA presentation, been looking at Mortons workfor a few years now. Can you contact me on gleem at 1ness dot co dot uk please

Mitch

10/18/2018 07:37:58 pm

Sorry. I cannot.

LAU

8/15/2018 02:14:40 pm

Ok. And so that can be controlled by controlling the special electromagnetic energy of the two disks OR of the one disk with outer counter-electromagnetic spin of the electromagnets.

That controls "gravity-time" ... in a negative electromagnetic field.

ron kita link

8/19/2018 03:16:16 pm

Highly interesting Electret citations see Kita 8901943 Gravity Attenuation via electrets, The ideal electret craft will require NO power. I asked my friend the late Boyd Bushman ex-Lochkeed. Boyd did you ever weigh your electrets as in your power source patent, Boyd s response....Never respectfully, Ron Kita, http://www;chiralex.com

Random Question

9/11/2018 08:33:31 am

On the recently published video (9/9), there is a ultrasonic generator on top of the upper disk. Any thoughts on orientation?

Chris

9/16/2020 10:06:01 am

Piezo fires downward.

Gambeir link

9/14/2018 12:59:41 am

Hi, I just discovered your blog. It's been posted on Energeticforums in my thread. Great material you have managed to unravel.
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/20737-inquiry-alien-reproduction-vehicle-17.html

We do think that we understand Alexey's Machine. Please visit our site and my thread entitled "An inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle."

Briefly, what we think so far is this device is a capacitor using a process known as vacuum polarization.

Alexey's machine seems to be operating on what is more commonly known as vacuum polarization. It is accomplishing this by creating and sustaining a dielectric field through mechanical means by rotating the magnets. Magnets are in reality a product of a dielectric counterspace slowed by passing through a crystalline formation. All magnets possess a dielectric field and is the reason they are magnets. See Ken Wheelers Book to understand this.
https://ia802502.us.archive.org/31/items/magnetism1small/magnetism1small.pdf

These video's by John Iwaszko are more than 20 years old. Still this will give you a general understanding of the what vacuum polarization is.

Vacuum Polarization
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIcq6QEJ2os
Channel Youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/user/JOHNROMANIWASZKO

Typically when a quartz capacitor is charged/pumped with energy it will eventually break down the dielectric field. This machine provides a means to maintain the dielectric field to sustain the polarization process by using spinning magnets on a plate. Only one plate on the bottom is probably necessary.

Nikola Von Braun

2/27/2019 03:51:16 pm

Hi there I am so glad I found this blog ever since I saw the original video on YouTube I wondered about the same thing what kind of metal is he using in the dielectric disks. Today I was watching a video on magnetic levitation by laser saber. If you watch near the end of the video he’s experimenting with pyrolytic graphite and towards the end of the video it shows a close-up of this material it looks very similar

Nikola Von Braun

2/27/2019 03:59:06 pm

So anyways here is a link to that video you be the judge could it be possible that Alexis is using pyrolytic graphite https://youtu.be/4EKgPvIFdrg

abu

10/17/2019 02:18:10 pm

please contact me by em i have to share.

Bob

10/30/2019 10:59:17 pm

Hello,
Interesting Blog and I do like Alexey's Electro-Gravitic craft !
I'd like to try and build it. I'm in Springfield Va.
Where is everyone else from ?
Years ago I was the Wash.Dc pod leader for the OTC-X1 but got disillusioned for several reasons. Maybe because it operates on mind control and positive thoughts or the steering mechanism was a magical soccer ball or because there was so much good structural dimensions of the vehicle/parts but so little of vital wiring or operational controls. I always thought that if I stub my toe walking to the OTC-X1 on something that the ship is now inoperable do to my bad thoughts. It seems to only fly at super fast speeds and I might want to just move it over in the driveway a few feet and it would accidentally smash into something. Who could fly it even if you could build it, then it only operates depending on your mood.
Tesla built the Flivver, about the size of a refrigerator, which he floated out of his hotel room 33 floors above the ground. The Fliver had no moving parts but just a pancake coil on the bottom pulsing low frequency AC and another on top pulsing high frequency DC. Then Tesla was murdered by Otto Scorziny & Reinhardt Gehlen for those plans and the Mist of Mercury particle beam death ray. The Germans built the Firefly, Tortoise shell and Foo Fighter based on this design. The Germans also built the Vril, Bell, Thule and Haunibu 1, 2 & 3. The Haunibu 2, built in Hauniburg Germany was the most widely photographed UFO in the 50's and did a show of force over the US capital in July 1952 after we lost the war with them in Antarctica in 1948.
There's the ARV- Alien Reproduction Vehicle built by American Military contractors in the 80's and drawn very well by Mark McCandish. It has no moving parts and operates solely on high positive voltage on the sides angled inward with many separate capacitors and negative voltage on the bottom in many capacitors in the floor cut like slices of a pizza. Turn off one or two capacitors on one side/bottom and the support is lost there causing drift in that direction. The Haunibu's have 3 round balls under them which are mercury condensors or capacitors charged by induction from the 3 pick up coils around the ship receiving from one main pulsing Tesla coil top center. Then there is MHD- MagnetoHydroDynamic's, Thrust 10x that of Earth's gravity to the 40th power by intersecting the magnetic field perpendicular to the electric field of pulses producing thrust and being the mechanical definition of the Unified Field Theory. Understanding the Maypole Experiment by Thomas Townsend Brown is obviously a requirement for this science and is the basis for the B2 Bomber's secondary propulsion system and Lockheed's Flying Diamond which also floats on 3 mercury balls.

I've built very many Bedini Pulse motors, have large and small Tesla coils, Got a wimshurst, electric motors, lots of magnetic wire and lots of Neod Magnets.

So maybe you can help me with identifying some of Alexey's parts.
1.What is that dome on the top for ? , Its not in some of his designs.
2. Earlier designs had Magnets on the top and bottom rotor but the
most recent version doesn't have them on top, Why is that ?
3. Is the Tesla coil pulsing AC or DC ?
4. Seems the Tesla coil output is attached to the frame
for the middle stationary largest disc. Probably AC then ?
5. The lower rotor has a brush rubbing it from the negative terminal
from the 12 volt battery and the upper rotor has a brush rubbing it
from the positive terminal of the 12 volt battery. Yes ?
6. Can you identify the power sources he uses ?
Looks like 3 of them but one may be a voltage multiplier ?
The large black one on the left seems to be a transformer for the
Tesla coil but the only caps I see are two small ones on the right.
Of course he has a 12 volt car battery.
7. The 2 motors top and bottom I assume are DC ?
The one on the bottom looks much larger and heavier.
Is there something more there than just a motor ?
8. The stationary structural disc in the center has large metal pie
shaped plates with about 5 big bolts in it on each leg. Why ?,
Ballast to keep it vertical ?, or dielectric plates to absorb or store
energy like a capacitor ?
In 1962 TT Brown worked at Bahnson labratories in NC with Agnew Bahnson and James Frank King aka JF King, all 3 filed some great patents with the USPTO and have some great illustrations.

[email protected]

Chris

9/16/2020 11:53:53 am

1) Piezo
2) Not needed?
3) AC
4) Correct
5) Correct
6) Slayer Tesla coil center plate, flyback transformer into voltage multiplier circuit DC rectified to spin disks. all driven from common 12V lead/acid battery.
7) Both DC motors only. Bottom is pancake motor.
8) ?? The DC motors are electrically isolated with non conductor materials. Hope this answers your question. Which model? This references the outdoor flyer.
Best Regards, Chris
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1845994638866165&set=a.286583681473943&type=3

Chris

9/16/2020 12:03:30 pm

Correction::
5) Incorrect. The brushes are feeding HV DC from flyback/multiplier circuit. Top +, Bottom - . But circuit is powered by 12 Volt battery.
BR Chris

12/30/2019 07:33:49 pm

Just a short comment.about otis car's ( amusement toy patent) lol Everyone thought he was a fool but he knew more then he told. He used golden geometry to design his sauser. Any platonik solid will gather and increase cosmic energy. Russian techs did many experiments about pyrimids. In one. They put 1 inch high plastic pyrimids on a disk and plaster magnets on both sides of where they traveled when spun. The disk was placed in a 5 inch thick metal ball. About 4 ft dua. At a certain rpm the pyrimids would glow and become simi solid .t.them they would fly off the dish and go straight through the wall of the ball and bury themselves in the wall of the room.they called it pinch off when the pymirids were fully energised and flew off the dish. They also said that neg.high voltage charged them as well as being alined north to south. Carr used cones whitch are also platonic solids.he also had electro magnets wrapped around them. I can't help but wonder what happened when the cones reached pinch off.

Chris

2/25/2020 07:30:33 am

I really believe Alexey is breaking the time inverse symmetry of the (SO) spin orbital interaction. That's altering the quarks and creates the anisotropy we are seeing. I have duplicated one of the craft and have proof that it does decrease weight. Their's a lot of disinformation about the design. For example the Tesla coil is a Slayer Exciter and is producing AC to the center plate. You can touch it as it is high frequency AC ~2.5 MHz. That guy who tries to explain the design is so wrong. The HV to the spinning disk is DC and the schematic for its design is wrong. You can see more if you look at my Face Book page; Chris Hardeman OKC USA
If you want more information you can message me on FB
Best Regards
Chris Hardeman

Michael Z.

3/11/2020 12:23:07 pm

I would be glad to do that considering your credentials however where is the link to your FB page. There's a lot of Chris Hardeman imposters lurking about in FB in the OKC area.

Jose

3/7/2020 02:30:25 am

It's something simple, if you want to understand how it works you can visit the site below. I think the logic is the same

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2kkCGRqZWaSIK3BmLC8vaw/playlists

Chris Hardeman link

3/13/2020 02:37:05 am

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1845994638866165&set=a.286583681473943&type=3

Solomon I. Khmelnik

7/10/2022 06:01:55 am

Dear Chris,
What is stopping you from completing the project?
Regards,
Solomon

Ed link

3/15/2020 10:27:28 am

Have you considered the part that torsion waves play in his rig? The indentation in the alum. Corospond to a cone. Whitch is a platonic solid.You should read up on the experiments done on pyrimids by the Russians.This is a wave based universe we live in.platonic solids collect and store torsion waves. They travel thousands of times faster then light
The Russians also did experiments on the cavity shapes of insects hives. They discovered a real and repeatable effect. A physical effect. They did one experiment with a disk with 4 small pyrimids glued to the disk that was spun with magnets on either side of them as they were spun. They discovered that the pyrimids collected torsion wave energy from the magnets until they were apparently FULL ( whitch they called pinch off) at whitch point, the pyrimids would wrench themselves from the disk and dematerialise as they went through the 5 inch thick metal wall of the experiment champers. As they left the chamber they REmaterlised outside the chamber and buried themselves in the walls of the room.They also discovered that every star in the universe is connected with a huge river of torsion wave energy. They also discovered that a major source of torsion waves for our universe comes from black holes as x rays. Scientist are learning that thier whole model of reality was completely wrong. The old model of electrons protrons, ECT is b.s.. It's all based on the golden mean.all the different shapes in nature are nested in plastic solids.

We really do live in the matrix. In a way.lol. just something to consider.

3/24/2020 09:05:50 pm

I just read the part about hv ac on central center disk. So
It a ( space aliens from the Pentagon design?) High voltage d.c. ( a positive brush) on top and a h.v. ac on bottom. Everyone seems to explain reality in a different way but you can't really argue with positive results.. One claims torsion waves and one claims the aeather..The spinning disks and the magnets may not even be needed. I need to gather the materials and experiment for myself.

Steele Braden link

7/30/2020 03:43:51 pm

Dear Ed, it would be very helpful if a full circuit diagram could be obtained. However, I suppose that the inventor is unlikely to divulge this. What are his intentions? Is he wanting funding to carry on further research to a full scale device that could be piloted?
If so, he would need to submit his prototype to be scrutinised thoroughly to any would-be investor. Without this, the device will progress no further.

Steele Braden link

8/2/2020 07:20:43 pm

Dear Ed, as an electronics engineer, I make the following observations: In the first video of the craft hovering in a field, there are only TWO wires connected to the craft.
In the second video (in the sitting room of the inventor) there are THREE wires connected to the craft.
For those not conversant with electrical circuits, this may not be seen as an issue.
However, I am greatly puzzled by the TWO ONLY wire configuration.
In my opinion, two, are not enough.
With THREE wires,
No. 1 would be the "common/negative".
No. 2 would be the low voltage to supply the motor circuit.
No. 3 would be the HT supply.
Just how a two wire system could work is beyond me.
My suspicious mind is working overtime.
Perhaps someone else has an explanation?

Chris

9/17/2020 12:56:02 pm

You can see three wires at 9:44 in the field video.

John Hamilton link

6/27/2023 10:43:15 am

I have just started looking into this (6/27/2023). I am also an EE. But have a machine shop and have a background in High Voltage. I have cascades that generate up to 150KV, probably over kill for this. But my interest is peaked. Are the 2 wires really 2 cables? 1 for the motors (+ and ground) and one of High Voltage. That leaves us with does one side of the HV have to be connected to earth ground? That would be a problem. It looks like one disk has 6 flat magnetics, not sure if the are flat edge N and S or if they are diametrically magnetized. My guess is Flat Edge. I am not sure what High Voltage is used, but my supply is variable so I can play with it. I have also been thinking of using a 3 phase electro magnetic approach. So there would be no spinning disk, but rotating electrical fields. I am guessing the center disk is some ferrous material. Lots of reading to do and things to experiment with. Any help would be appreciated.

MATTHEW A COMBATTI

9/13/2020 09:14:26 pm

The invention is related to the following patent ;-)

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20030209637A1/en

John Hamilton link

6/27/2023 10:50:28 am

Just a note: this patent has been abandoned.

steele braden link

9/16/2020 08:46:53 pm

Dear Editor,
still waiting for someone to come up with the electrical circuit.
Has anybody else, duplicated the craft successfully?

Ish

11/25/2020 08:37:33 pm

Btw idk if the author of this article noticed, from like the explanation Cherkukov gave on one of his vids, he had a document with an english translation that mentioned a circuit for an ultrsonic generator. In other words, hes somehow using magnetic/electromagnetic fields AND sound to make his gravitflyer work. Just wanted to mention it so u could ig also analyze his craft with tht info too. Im tryig to understand how it works too lmao.

Chris Hardeman

1/5/2021 03:11:50 pm

I have a few points to make about the schematic in the circuit design. The wire at Diode 3 is connected to the wire crossing in front. It is noticeable in the video that a dot is present. Why does it matter? Unconnected the HV power supply producers AC WITH A DC OFFSET, this is not good. Connected the circuit is pure DC, which is what you want. The tesla coil is a slayer exciter Tesla coil that has a natural resonance frequency, nothing else will give this pure resonance. Operating at 2.5 MHz because when the lead wire is inserted the frequency will attenuate possibly by 1 MHz.

The center plate is likely iron plate not steel and spangled with Tin. Possibly hot dipped. The composition is definitely NOT aluminum. Rust is evident on the video. Tin is more likely in my opinion as it has a particularly filled outer orbital that can undergo strong orbital interaction with the nucleus. I have seen losses of 80 grams with different metals, so the concept in my experiments DOES confirm the concept. I have videos and pictures, but cannot post from them here.

Chris Hardeman

1/17/2021 11:02:34 am

Would like to share my research into Alexey Chekurkov duplicate on YouTube with your site. See my YouTube videos on it at alexey chekurkov duplicate Chris H
Best Regards Chris Hardeman

Dennis Arends link

6/14/2021 05:55:12 am

i might have a few possible counter spinning magnet solutions. forcing them together by using two motors, and shape to fixate them in place. i hope some people here might be interested, i have a few new ideas of some interest maybe. im Dutch from the Netherlands, but at this point willing to work with anyone. the Dutch industrial [aero] space company is still in its infancy.

https://www.cgtrader.com/raqia-design

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGttBSvpr0dH_0oI1MdA6jQ

please have a look, you can contact me there as well.

Mike

12/31/2021 10:24:08 pm

Hi very interesting

Leo's Friend

2/12/2022 06:55:41 pm

If it is floating via antigravity, why dies it stay in the same location above the ground? The Earth rotates at over 1,000 mph. So, why doesn't the device appear to move away at that rate of speed? (Actually, we would be the ones moving because we are still bound thlo the Earth's gravity, and thus moving with the Earth as it rotates. An object no longer bound to gravity would be left behind by us, as it now levitates in its stationary spot. The Earth rorating at 1K mph, revolving around the Sun at 67,000 mph, and the Sun revolves around the milkyway at 500,000 mph. These speed approximations don't even consider how fast the Milkyway is, itself, moving within the local group of galaxies, how fast the local group is moving within our region of the known universe, etc., etc. The real challenge in antigraviy travel, seems, to me, this impact once we loose the bonds of gravity. "Driving" between point A and B seems less a challenge than the fact that both point A and B will likely be sailing away from us, rather drastically and unpredictably, in our levitating antigravity ship. I think I've FINALLY reached my question: Why aren't we seeing these floating devices in the demonstrative videos zooming up and away at hundreds-of-thousands mph the moment they cut the gravitational umbilical cord?

Steven Chiverton link

3/27/2022 02:47:19 am

i thought i was on the verge of creating levitation as i was doing a scalar beamer experiment when the electric motor in it that was laying on its side at first suddenly was pivoted on the end of its shaft and balanced perfectly while still spining during the experiment

M.Trever

7/17/2023 12:29:06 pm

Are the drawings available to build ? I want to build this to prove legitimation love it and give it to the world

LAU

7/18/2023 10:19:49 am

Go for it!

Ziggy link

9/6/2023 08:59:59 am

Hello,

According to my antigravity hypothesis, Chekurkov’s Graviflyer is a real, pure, and true antigravity device. This is how it works:

https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/chekurkov-graviflyer/

G J P

9/17/2023 09:21:50 am

Never show it taking off or landing over grass?

Tuck

12/16/2024 11:24:26 am

Look Guys... This Russian Lad tried his best to make the theory work and it doesn't. What you are watching is a hoax. There is a metal plate, most likely copper, on the ground/floor under it. Outside hidden by grass, inside over-layed by prior shot of the tile.

Outside: Direct shots of the ground are done pre-flight with no plate, take-off done side shot, High flight is shot in place, because the device needs assistance to be balanced that high over the plate, or it will side out off the magnetic plane during lift. Also outside he never walks directly under the device, always around the hidden plate.

If you watch the floor of the inside house video, you can see clearly a blur where they have touched up around the cables? Why? because the cables are not exactly where they were when the tile was shot pre-flight for post production overlay, and when the copper plate was slid under them, the plate also probably created a reflective glow back onto the cables that had to be tempered. If you want to see the touchups more clearly.. cut a pic of the floor and take it into photoshop or similar and create negative.

People wrote to him and told him to film out of the field and include the take-off... so he filmed in a patch totally covered by mulch... clearly the plate was under mulch.

This is such a great example of science seeing what it wants to see rather than what's wrong with the example.

A field that channels/redirects gravity around a vehicle is certainly possible, but is not it folks.

LAU and .....

______________________
Hyperdrive Mechanics
And Physics

Primarily involving the construction of the OTC-X1 Electro-Gravity Craft right now. This page provides operational theory and design to further the development along.

See the post "... Engineering Breakthrough" (on this page) for further wiring possibilities, and acknowledgements.

. . .

The Outer Ring of the LAU-X3 Dragon-Eye integrates technology of Keshe, who has publicly disclosed a gravitational craft design of his own.

Antigravity Demonstration Using Counter-Rotating Magnet-Electrostatic Fields From Russia

Leave a Reply.

LAU and .....

Archives

Categories