Duplication and independent verification of other people's results is a due process of "science."
However, not many people are inclined to do what others have done, but instead to learn FROM what others have done, to take things even further.
How do you know if it's the truth? Well, that's where duplication and independent verification comes from, to learn to understand the laws of physics that leads us to engineering achievements that are will into the "it's very possible" range.
Otherwise, it's not entirely logical to claim that someone is a "Fraud" without verifying it, first. Only the skeptic extremists make such claims without examining the full picture, first. The reason they do so is because they are too lazy to address each question that arises from potential controversial observations.
For example being able to "see" an electron through an electron microscope as a two dimensional square object does not exactly violate known physics, but then does a two dimensional object really exist in a 3 and 4 and 5-D reality without some kind of exchange from the quantum vacuum (the Inner Universe), because a 2-D object isn't exactly taking up all the space it can, therefore doesn't entirely exist in space as an "object."
Many of the important questions of "how and why did the universe come into existence" can NEVER be answered, but it can be understood what the Nature of the Universe is, with further definition from observing what the Universe Does, to identify universal action. That the universe DID come into existence, and then taking things from there leads to real discovery than to use religion to explain mechanisms that only Source can know. Arrogance and pride is to be avoided. Because even the religions teach that Humans cannot know something far greater and beyond Humans, and cannot "know exactly what God is thinking or was thinking before the Creation of the Universe." I view God as Oneness, and upon the level of Consciousness (energy and action) only, as a Creation (Identity), rather than the Source of Creation. Otherwise it becomes a tertiary paradox of Creation because the Creation cannot define the Creator. I can write all about these physics and create them (based on research, so co-creation), but this work is not the totality of who I am; because it is Who I Am which has led to this work as a portion of expression of my "Self." (for example)
From my point of view, I'm duplicating Tesla's work, and the work of other researchers and scientists. Most of my work has been to fulfill the role of "independent verification and duplication." That's what so many people don't realize when they point fingers at me and call me names and tell me I'm not being responsible by revealing this work to other "scientists..." Huh? Not revealing? I'm not sharing?
A lot of people say this is "bad science" because they can't verify the experiments for themselves. What? Huh? Not everyone has the time and motivation TO build 40 foot Tesla towers and check for this stuff ... At least I did! As much as I try to keep my pride out of things, other people attack me on that pride, and then think I suffer from injured pride to justify their own existence ... and I just DON'T get upset over it, but it upsets other people, who then start to look at science in just as bad a light as atheism, or some mortally insulting blow to the establishment of society that people cling to so much.
Unfortunately, you really have to be wise AND smart, and emotionally stable to even understand half this stuff. That's not a statement of ego or pride, but of observation only, stated as a matter-of-fact, without any personal bias attachment.
It was bad enough pointing out the conflict with Tesla physics and Einstein's Relativity. They are both somewhat two separate things, and exist independently, and both seems to be the truth. There is only one compromise I've been able to find which merges the two together, though. And in that merging we find out gravity waves travel faster than light in conditions of gravitation, and thus enabling faster movement through time itself, since light is simultaneous. Light measures the frequencies of time itself. Under conditions of gravitation we have an incredible playground to explore!
This stuff should be fun, not controversial and stressful! It is an enjoyment of mind and universes. Why though, if it something of joy, so many fights break out about the differences?
If it can't be enjoyed, why mess with it? But on the other hand, how do you keep a tight reign on the mind, so it doesn't run away with it while missing the whole point that this stuff is supposed to be like sailing and meeting good folks at the marinas.
People are being uprooted as nations are destroyed and cities are burning, while most people would prefer to live in harmony with life and in balance and happiness. I guess that's the only reason why these things aren't really "on the table" of any further development at this time. Not until more people generate an interest in it.
NASA has been working on warp drive, and only the few are really keeping up with it. That's for a reason, I think. We may have the knowledge, and we may even have it in secret; and if it's so easy, then there's probably some kind of galactic war going on, too. Maybe over things like this very technology and liberating Earth from enslavement and ongoing genetic modification to keep us from becoming what we naturally are, and have been all along.
... some people are more familiar with what's going on than others. A lot of people fight to protect the very Matrix they are hopelessly dependent on. We are kept blind to understanding the paradox and how it unifies, in so many ways. But otherwise, we are totally free to do what we want to.
I want to go sailing. Honestly. And fly airplanes because that's so joyful! Flying around to other planets well.. it's not surrounded by the beauty and harmony of Nature and of Earth and all the marvels we can find right here on Earth!