This article represents the end and the beginning; a true Completion of the end of one cycle and the beginning of a new age. I've used the metaphysical definition of "completion" all this time, which is not the state of ending, but of becoming whole, of projection into a future of reality that which can sustain its own existence, relating to Human Civilization which has overcome Humanity's own tendencies of catastrophic self-destruction, becoming over-unity, technologically and philosophically.
I've said this over and over "it's begun, oh, it's begun" but I've never said "it's ended," because when it ends, it means it's over, and that would imply no new developments. A state of completion is a state of fullness, of inner-generating inertia, of self-determining reality, of Humanity acting as its own gods, able to follow a Divine Purpose under its own steam, rather than being manipulated by ET over and over because we have too MUCH potential for the galaxy to handle.
I actually need to put this website down for a long while because I have things to do, a life to live, and working this stuff out has really stopped me from doing much of anything else, including working out the Tesla tower Ley-line technology.
I want to leave it on a good note however, which is somewhat of a breakthrough ...
Things are really starting to happen.
Bedini over-unity energy is making it big time, and talented individuals are surfacing in the public, like Leland Williams, AKA Matrix Le, who has accomplished around 15 - 20 times more output over input at least, by the looks of things; and in his sneak peak actually shows the numbers to be 46 watt input to 722.5 watt output, which is 15 times amplification; overunity. So he has done it, and you can see two videos of his on the "John Bedini -- Tribute to his Legacy" recently mega-updated article on the General Blog page!
I also updated the "It's more simple than you think" article on the Free Energy / Tesla page which now explains what is going on with that little simple engine after careful evaluation -- even explaining how to duplicate it.
Multiple Bedini engines at once (used in combination) are also being shown in some circles, and those plans and ways and videos are now in the public domain and accessible; links shown at this website.
More people are coming forward with antigravity methods and tests, but those are still in private development currently, but more people are working on those systems (which is really all it takes, because we're making progress in all these fields as a people of Earth), including the OTC-X1 reverse engineering and reproduction, also making progress.
More people are working with MEGs and Rodin-Powell vortex coils, BOTH for power systems and antigravity applications and tests, coming forward in public.
People are not paying attention though, and are unable to understand these things, and there is very little coverage of these breakthroughs resultingly, with only a few hundred people actually taking an interest in overunity engines and subscribing to promising inventors' YouTube channels.
What has occurred recently has sent humanity into leaps and bounds of a technological revolution changing our understanding of physics as we have commonly come to know.
More is becoming known about negative energy, and some people have quoted Dr. Harold White of NASA EAGLEWORKS saying that an overbalance of "more volume of positive charge in a capacitor than negative charge is negative energy" ... which correlates with the mono-pole characteristic of negative energy, however that view is still of based on a vacuum of negative charge, which would increase the power output of the negative charge. So our mainstream scientists are still trying to figure it out in terms of polarity and duality instead of the unified wave shape of energy between electromagnetic waves and longitudinal (scalar) waves -- negative energy is the negative collapsed waveform of electromagnetism as a longitudinal wave, "teleporting" the electromagnetic energy from one end of the wave to the other, where the longitudinal wave is transformed back into electromagnetic energy, after amplification; the energy is merely transformed, and travels faster than electromagnetic waves when transformed to longitudinal waves.
But, in the Basic Tesla Antigravity concept, it shows that the positive charge is the most pronounced pole in scalar charge, as the active driving force of electrogravitic energy (because the positive pole goes on top of a Tesla coil on an airframe as the lack of electron gathering at the top, while instead the electrons gather at the bottom, but also move in a circular field) at the top or forward side of an electrogravity craft, demonstrating electron vacuum at the bottom, and the inertial "stimulation" of mass at the top -- and again showing the backwards approach to the compression of the negative charge and the expansion of the positive charge, in complete reversal of the White warp drive model, showing spacetime is expanded around the front of the craft and compressed at the bottom in a vacuum force of internalized inertia, "disconnected" from normal spacetime.
But if you really think about it, any boat moving through the water or aircraft moving through the air will push against the medium it moves through -- compression in front -- and wave expansion occurs behind, but that is just the nature of an object moving through a medium. Paradoxical reasoning depends upon unity rather than duality. The only way to travel faster than light is to eliminate the force of resistance as described by a forward compression and rear expansion. In a jet engine, air force is a lower pressure in front of an aircraft (longer waves), and compressed behind the craft (higher pressure), driving a craft forward.
So the White model cannot be correct because it is self-contradicting as per what we know of these systems. A projectile hurdled through water will experience wave compression in front and expansion behind, which is in contrast to a real theory of propulsion.
If dealing with electrical inertia as a force of electrogravity, the electrical volume (volume of electrons; the negative charge) must be compressed behind the craft, or at the bottom (in contrast to White's theory of negative energy). There are two kinds of plasma, positive and negative; in a vacuum, it is the electrons which make up the plasma, but in air, it is the protons which comprise the plasma. These aspects are currently being examined, and plasma is being considered as the di-electric medium, along with mass of substance as the driving force behind electrogravity action.
The working concept here is that the plasma vibrates the material of the craft just as a dielectric will vibrate electrogravitically with internalized inertial forces, just as electrons vibrate the protons of the nucleus of material. Were a magnet only the result of electron alignment, a magnet would be a weak force unable to overcome the much higher mass of the protons. It doesn't require that a proton be accelerated to the speed of light, only that it vibrates at a higher frequency than electromagnetic wave speed.
In "cold plasma" or otherwise plasma obtained in a near-vacuum, protons end up vibrating rapidly regardless. In the case of over-unity, are there more electrons being created than what is natural to a material as an amplification of electrical energy, or is it the result of frequency and vibration that creates more energy than what is in equilibrium to an input and an output, overcoming resistance?
Such is the case with concepts of negative energy plasma, or even in the case of accelerating protons to light speed. Mass is created in abundance relative to frequency of motion, BUT ALSO frequency of vibration, where an energy field is responsible for changing the nature of the mass of a material in either positive or negative measurable values, and POLARIZING that mass into a field of inertia, similar to Townsend Brown's "stressing the dielectric" physics, which shows that torsion fields are not without mass, but having everything to do with mass. Torsion fields are what Townsend Brown used to describe the electrogravitic action of dielectric inertia.
As air changes is vector at 90 degrees, guided electrically, part of the inertia of that air is projected along its prior path, and inertia is traded angularly, but such a mechanism is so crude that only a slight lift can be produced unless its energy field acts inductively upon a sufficiently massive material, polarizing the atomic structure of dielectric material (including water) in a way in which the material's stillness none-the-less generates a field of inertia that acts upon itself.
The physics of this are still somewhat unknown but luckily it can be bypassed in favor of something that is more known and recognizable. The movement of air and/or plasma should not be considered as the force of thrust because it is weak, but it must be considered inductively instead just as a moving magnet induces electrical current to flow in a wire, and that electrical current can be built up so that it creates much more electrical energy than can be accounted for just by accounting for each electron.
For inertia to achieve over-unity proportions, there must be over-unity energy present in the system. What achieves the over-unity of inertia is the collapse of the resistance of mass, which is what Bedini (using a Lenz buster) and Tesla-tower Ley-line setups are working with. Can plasma as a positive charge of protons be accelerated faster than light speed using longitudinal waves, instead of electromagnetic waves? Electromagnetic wave speed is not the speed limit of matter, since energy in a form of electrons can move faster than electromagnetic wave speed, resulting in the electromagnetic mass having to be a negative value, because a positive value of mass cannot move faster than light.
This is where negative energy (exotic) plasma is accounted for, because electrons are a negative charge, whereas the sine wave of electromagnetism is positive at the crest and negative at the trough. Transforming scalar to electromagnetic, and electromagnetic to scalar, is the transformation of the wave form of a measurement of mass (in terms of electrons) from a wave to a flat plane with side-ways wave motion (no resistance; superconductive) instead of up and down motion (resistance upon spacetime).
Protons also have mass; it is the nature of mass that it is electromagnetic. In dielectric materials, the protons within the atomic elemental lattice of form are induced to vibrate in longitudinal waves to generate electrogravity (directed inertia). Protons by themselves are not necessarily dielectric, which ALSO means that they can move at speeds greater than electromagnetic wave propagation speeds (because there is no waveform of up AND down, which requires both positive and negative to work with each other), if induced with scalar (longitudinal) energy, or negative energy which is the concept of electrogravity. HOWEVER ... as we see in the electrostatic lifters, we also see that air is dielectric such as oxygen or nitrogen, or noble gasses which combine in pairs and are dielectric in the sense like helium is a structure of dielectric pairs. ..... but electrons are the only "things" which can break the laws of motion in that SOMETHING MUST BE MOVING FASTER THAN LIGHT in di-electric, parallel, and longitudinal waveforms.
Scalar energy can vibrate electrical mass into motion (electricity) and is responsible for over-unity, ultimately. It can also vibrate protonic mass into motion. Upon achieving a high enough vibration faster than the speed of light, a craft only needs a slight lift to move at incredible speeds. The high vibration in this case, or high frequency upon a static proton (non-moving yet vibrating in place) if vibrating faster than light must then be reducing its mass!
This is an inductive aspect in nature. What materials are both conductive AS WELL AS dielectric??? Certainly not aluminum, or tin foil used on electrostatic lifters. ......... Electromagnetic induction is the key here, whereas electromagnetic collapse can only be sustained as a force for as long as it takes the field to collapse, and must depend upon ultra high frequency to achieve an over-unity energy output as in the case of successful Bedini applications. Where we see flyback voltage being used in a lifter, we ALSO see a tremendous loss of ion wind, coincidentally enough. What would happen when we send that flyback voltage through a layered magnetic and dielectric "capacitor" conductively, inductively, polarized in the same manner and in the same polarity as the natural atomic structure of the material? THAT is where we see the strong electrogravity lift, inducing mass to a negative value yet while also inducing inertia into a gravitational resonance.
In a vacuum, or near vacuum, this force is amplified just as electronic applications use near-vacuums to do that same job of amplification such as in a car stereo system, but in a crude fashion that depends upon an air vacuum to maintain a tiny stream of electrons, to resemble a collapsed state of volume, instead of using the actual collapse of electromagnetic energy through a near air-vacuum, which is a far more elegant approach to harnessing negative energy. Nowadays we use transistors and solid state which uses quantum tunneling principles to achieve amplification, but all that is merely resonance of energy which seems to create free electrons out of nothing, or to duplicate an electron -- basic stereo radio uses the electron signal from one electrical stream, and turns one electron into two electrons which makes for stereo radio, using quantum mechanics principles of creating mass. It's called quantum tunneling, the effect of a single particles of mass to exist in two places simultaneously and take two different paths. Where did the extra mass come from that is duplicated? It is the creation of energy, and energy creates mass ultimately, from light. See: "Matter is Light; Creating Energy" and "Paradoxes of Unity" on the General Blog page.
Certainly an electret power cell creates electricity but without creating new electrons. Energy is created in abundance! However now we are seeing the nature of the creation of mass, too?? Why these things are interchangeable! Since mass is electromagnetic, then why can it not be positive OR negative; for as light, it is not electromagnetic as much as it is unity, of both positive and negative at once.
This is EASY to see, but a little harder to see how all these dynamics all work AT ONCE, in a dynamic system, unless you have studied, studied, studied, and have altered your thinking metaphysically to accept what we have observed as being real, in our scientific pursuits.
It is particularly thrilling that more OTC-X1 progress reports are available to share, and we have a clear idea of how a utron is constructed thanks to the work done at the Clandestine Disclosure pod group. With Bedini and Bearden technologies, we are closer than ever before to quickly achieving a prototype (even though overall progress is still slow at this time).
A whole lot of recent updates and editing has been done at this website, as it took some time to perfect several key articles throughout this site, including home and news pages. Critical information is now more consolidated throughout the various pages. The LAU-X4 model is also becoming more of a solid foundation; and any advancement of Rodin-Powell anti-gravity is still applicable and adaptable in the Outer Ring (even if the vortex coils have to be oriented in odd directions throughout the outer ring).
I feel we have a much better understanding of what we are dealing with overall. The vertical impeller, probably the only original engine design actually being proposed, is holding its ground as a multi-functional electro-inertial engine, whereas we are seeing vortex spirals, but no linear spirals, flat, or vertical spirals, yet to be truly considered by the general public, in spite of those shapes' obvious performance enhancements in electrogravity and electro-inertial dynamic application.
The Cannae electric-inertia space engine has finally come across my watchful eye too, which further adds credibility to the vertical impeller, and just is not very well known in the public because the EM drive (the "other" electric space engine) has made those headlines instead. More is now understood about Townsend Brown electrogravity, as seen on the Updates and Design Improvement page, as well, which also relates to the vertical impeller.
The vertical impeller makes use of dielectric and magnetic layers, which by themselves under induction of flyback voltage creates an electrogravitic lift; yet while also set into motion, that lift is accelerated in multiplication upon itself (squared), while given a linear value of it's rate of motion of an individual plate segment to move up or down as the spiral's own geometry achieves -- a warp factor, as it were.
As a spiral is considered as electromagnetic current is run along a wire, with a spiraling magnetic energy (transverse), as electrical flow moves in parallel or longitudinally, then a flat wave between the bottom and top of the vertical core can be induced into vibration giving a longitudinal scalar beam mass, electromagnetically which is a true paradox. It is the energy of mass, directed electrogravitically, which creates a gravity wave. A Cannae drive creates gravity in one direction, resulting in inertial force without any moving parts. Inertia is gravity; it's the same force, and if spun where it does not resist its own motion, it could accelerate an engine spin under its own force of electrogravity to unsafe proportions unless magnetic bearings are used . . .
A good dielectric material should be able to produce gravity in alignment with its atomic lattice, either up OR down, so a ship can accelerate forward, apply the brakes, or accelerate in reverse, which is also why the vertical impeller is used.
Regardless, things seem to be moving ahead at a steady pace, and I am amazed at how everything is starting to come together.
I realize it takes a LOT of research and experimentation to understand the physics of warp drive, and I have tried to put as much information as possible all in one website, with many links connecting all these concepts together; and in many instances, the links are more important.
I am requesting more people get involved with this, as it should at least now be seen that this endeavor is a steady progressive force, evolving and making progress none-the-less, which is filling the void left behind due to the suppression of science as an agenda which started around 1947.
Please come forward with your accomplishments in anti-gravity propulsion, so more people can have access to more knowledge, so as to increase the R and D levels of society by adding more manpower to these endeavors.
Anything worthwhile is going to take a lot of time, study, experimentation and development. If you wish your achievements mainly pertaining to anti-gravity developments to be known and recognized in the world but wish to stay anonymous (or not), then you may contact me at the email on the footer of this website.
A LOT has been covered here at this website, things that change our entire paradigm of understanding of the universe, and the purpose of Humanity, why we exist, and where we are going. At this point, there is really nothing new that is coming around because it's going to take some time for Humanity to catch up with the wayshowers of the new springtime.
Again, I'll resurface with the "yay or nay" on the Tesla tower Ley-line research project.... other than that though .....
. . .
Now, Here's the Good News!
The physics are pretty much done. I'm not going to bang my head against a brick wall anymore trying to beat the physics senseless anymore.
I'd rather concentrate on the energy aspects of the motor concept of the OTC-X1. EXPECT UPDATES INVOLVING THIS NEW PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. In fact, I've already updated the top article on the Construction Blog page, OTC-X1 Status, the Why it works, explained in Negative Energy Physics.
I've picked up a little steam, got some great advice from friends (glad I have friends), and now I can apply this physics knowledge to energy systems, in DC and AC configurations, using Bedini technology and Bearden technology, pertaining to the OTC-X1.
I think I got all my crazy out of the way on this, and am grateful for some solid grounding .. well I probably shouldn't say that since I'll be doing Tesla tower Ley-line experiments, also. BUT, even though I am not to the point of getting utron parts machined yet, I do have a friend who is a machinist, so there's potential here.
As you probably know, or not, I've discussed aspects of AC antigravity, as well as DC antigravity involving Tesla technology. and that ole OTC-X1 is in an AC style geometry, and it is possible to run dual configurations and switch it over from an AC SYSTEM, to a DC SYSTEM, just from flipping a switch.
I've found another teacher.
So ... The physics explain the mechanisms of frequency and time and gravity and negative energy and all that, but the electronics and energy systems are the next stage -- the power systems, the wiring, the actual technology. I'm like a kid in a candy store! This is what I've always wanted to do, work with the energy systems, since I was a kid.
I will be emphasizing circuitry and power systems now, which now exists in the world after all this time. But this will be more of a private stage of development, with updates occurring more infrequently. I'm currently working on a special article involving a modified TR-3B approach which will be featured here on the info page, which will represent the last of the physics phase (and since I don't know that much about it, because I don't specialize in those systems, I might not ever post it up), but these overunity energy systems are a lot easier to learn; whereas the physics took a good solid decade plus some years because metaphysics were involved. Overunity engineering systems however (now that they are seen to exist), should be a lot easier, since they don't have to be created, just learned, and applied creatively.
AC antigravity using a negative-energy Bedini framework theoretically is supposed to work because of the White-Alcubierre warp drive model involving negative energy, and there is now a working theory of negative energy gravitation.
AC is actually attributed more toward a negative energy system innately since it involves the snap-reversal and collapse of electromagnetic energy fields; actually a snap-reversal is AC, but a collapsing pulse engine is DC.
Tesla used both these systems, but primarily he used AC. A rotor for example can have all magnets facing north out, instead of alternating north/south magnets; the coils can be wound clockwise or counterclockwise for AC, or the polarity can be switched over to alternate not by using a commutator, but by using solid state transistor technology. Yes, I'm finally accepting Ralph Ring's ultimate reality of the OTC-X1 possibilities.
Quite frankly, the only possibility I truly see here is to make use of double wound "bifilar" or otherwise classic Bedini-style double coil windings around the OTC-X1 outer electromagnets, whereas the collapse of the EM field will not cause the rotor to suddenly switch directions or stall, because it's making use of the collapse, rather than a sudden snap-reversal of polarity -- the collapse in this case is the key, and can occur over the utron positions, as I've said before. I don't want to go into too much detail regarding this right now of that which a Bedini engine can simply demonstrate that concept.
Since the Clandestine Disclosure group has determined that the utrons are to be holding a coil winding around them, then now we have a rotor with magnets that spins around, which can either be switched on for a magnet, or switched off for no magnet. To achieve a pure sine wave form, AC would be the best option to achieve a vortex field of electromagnetism, which some have called a "torsion" field, but since that is a controversial terminology, we'll just call it a vortex field of electro-magnetostatic action that moves upon spacetime. As far as defining "torsion field," that would serve as a good re-definition, or clarified definition.
In order to obtain the AC configuration while keeping the rotor moving in the same direction, there's gonna be some pole-switching. The electromagnets might have to be wound clockwise / counter-clockwise / clockwise / counter-clockwise, etc around the wheel, in alternation, and the polarity reversed upon the timing circuit which is what the rotor in a Bedini system is, is a timing rotor - mechanical inductive timing, using magnetic reed switches.
Since the OTC-X1 is a field generator, and a magneto-static field generator, then that is what gives it its antigravity and longitudinal wave characteristics.
That is the framework.
. . . and just on a note, here's a video concerning an older model prior to breakthrough development in bypassing Lenz's law ... one might want to notice what he is noticing about the special energy created by a Bedini setup which keeps the electronics well maintained, is used universally in all systems in spite of voltage, and is the result of the electromagnetic collapse ........ UNIVERSAL POWER SOURCE
Hint: did someone say negative-energy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNQRaj5ddJs
I don't want to keep adding new articles so much as I go along, so if any new developments arise, I'm going to minimize the effort, and I'll have to update existing articles. So if the guy who made the circular electrostatic lifter upgrades his design, it will be featured in that same article, for example.
More people seem to be starting to find this website, even though it's not really being shared around a whole lot, so I'll give it a shot. I don't know what to expect from this because it's a major shifting of gears .. but this is all pretty simple stuff so ... that's the good news.
In retrospect, as a follow up, now with more information, we found the TR-3B patent (black electrogravity flying triangle).
It *DOES* show compression in front of the vehicle, to move it forward, in contrast to action-reaction Newtonian thrust-reaction propulsion. So the vehicle moves in the same direction as its "thrust," showing it to be operating on its own internalized inertial forces. So, electro-gravitically, it is falling forward as the electrogravity forces rush along the sides of the hull, taking the craft with it. The same would apply to lift it up as well. Non-Newtonian, because it is not an equal and opposite reaction which propels it, but an equal and identical active force.
So Dr. White is correct, and we are not using Newtonian-based physics here.
It can be summed up simply: gravity and inertia are two sides of the same coin; where an electrons inertia flows, is where the gravity force also flows; equal and identical ... NOT equal and opposite
So in this arrangement, the direction of electron inertia is the negative charge, obviously because an electron is an intersection between electric and magnetic fields as a particle point of mass, and has a mono-pole negative charge, denoting the direction of the electron's inertia.
So as electron mass moves forward, the craft is carried forward, in the principle of electron gravity.
The same thing applies to the OTC-X1, whereas the electron inertia is from the outside of the hull toward the inside toward the Central Accumulator, demonstrating a gravity cancellation effect in that manner.
Here is the link to the patent: