UPDATED 10/26/18
​
​
I have to make a post about this, because people just don't know.  I talk about these things all over the website but, having an actual article about it is something easy to find, and easier to share.



People say free energy is a myth. That is not true. An electret is like a magnet but generates a permanent electric field instead of a magnet field.   The reason why people scoff at overunity and free energy is BECAUSE IT REQUIRES THAT ENERGY MUST BE CREATED.


The textbook definition of an electret is:  an electret is the electrostatic equivalent of a magnet, creating an electric field, that one can draw power from to run motors and whatnot for hundreds if not thousands of years, JUST LIKE A MAGNET CREATES A MAGNETIC FIELD FOR HUNDREDS OR THOUSANDS OF YEARS.

​WAKE UP, PEOPLE!



It creates current that can run motors, and it is reactionless because the current is not produced by reaction, just like how a magnet is an alloy or element or compound does not react chemically in order to produce a magnetic field.

Electrets were invented by the Japanese in WWII. They were used in older phones like rotary phones used all the up thru the 80's, to amplify the weak current of the microphone inside the telephone.

There are thousands of videos online about them, and people making them and using them. The most popular is called the Hutchison power cell.

People worship the law of thermodynamics so much, that they IGNORANTLY claim free energy does not exist. For one thing, THERMOdynamics is NOT the same as ELECTROdynamics.  And for the other thing, overunity energy devices which produces a greater current output than input are numerous, and have been seen and demonstrated by some famous people like Tom Bearden and John Bedini! There are even released patents now which are zero point and quantum vacuum based!

I'm starting to get pissed about people's skepticism and attitudes concerning what they are in the unknown about, and afraid of it!
​
I lived in a Tesla energy field for years, and I experienced some AMAZING things that I like to keep quiet about, because people are afraid; and because of that, they can be dangerous (potential threat, no bones about it). I speak from experience at how dangerous people can get just because they are afraid, and that's stuff I like to keep quiet about, too.



Here are a couple of videos of people's electrets in action, and too, the famous electret known as the Hutchison Power Cell:

​

It goes without saying that these can be used with Bedini systems (from the obvious Bedini-style construction of his motor, interestingly enough also seen on the huge image on the home page, in section 3).


In fact, it's actually rather embarrassing that people do NOT know these things. What's embarrassing also is that it's such a tiny, overlooked thing, that it's easy to forget about, which I guess is why I get embarrassed, because I've got other things going on that seriously put electrets to shame. ... and if people don't know about electrets, which have been around since WWII and in every single rotary telephone ever made, well ... it's no wonder people are clueless when it comes to faster-than-light drive systems and Tesla negative energy power systems.


. . .

​
These are NOT batteries. It is people's ignorance which fails to understand that there is no chemical reaction taking place which creates the power.

John Hutchison's girlfriend even said sometimes they turned out as generating AC power, and would make bizarre force-fields around the power cells which melted everything metal surrounding them.
​




I want to point out something really cool. The same space a 120 watt solar panel takes up can be filled with Hutchison power cell electrets to get about 3 amps at 13 volts. I know, its a big space, but runs night and day, never needs recharging, basically runs indefinitely. That's 1/3 the output of a standard 120 watt solar panel taking up the same physical space.

If you consider each electret is roughly a little smaller than a .30 caliber bullet, and you get a pack of 50.. to fill the space, you'd have to make 4,000 of em. Just say about 1/3 of that is in series to bring up the volts, and the rest wired in parallel to bring up the amps, then that's how I figure it based on my experience.

Say you stack em 10 high for a large box about 2.5 feet wide by 4.5 feet long by about 2 feet high for a power output of 400 watts of power available ALWAYS. 

Its a BIG box, but conserves more space than 3 or 4 big solar panels laid out side-by-side on the roof. 

Stack yer solar panels up 7 high, one on top of the other, and that is the same size box space as the power cell electrets. 

Your difference in power:

800 watts for 7 solar panels or 400 watts for 1 large power cell box. You'd just have to make 40,000 power cell electrets. But the good thing is that the power output can be amplified by about 100 TIMES using a Tom Bearden MEG (a little box-shape about a a one cubic foot). You can even add additional MEGs. 

So a 400 watt power generator made from 40,000 power cell electrets, all in a box about the size of a coffee table in length, width and height, using a MEG to amplify the output by 100 times the input (for a grand total of 40,000 watts) that runs night and day that you can dig a hole and bury it in your backyard aint bad. 

This is a pretty good stab at a power system run thru a whole ring of MEGs to power an aircraft or electrogravity craft.


That is what people have been killed for in the past, for taking stuff like this overseas to India. But in one gentleman's case, it was a box about 2 cubic feet in volume, layered in capacitor layers (sheets) that made a LOT of power.


This is the  concept of the Outer Ring engine, basically, minus a few things ...  But basically there's about 22 large MEG units in the Outer Ring (let's just say 22 of them;  TWO power cell boxes at 800 watts x 100 x 22).  Using two of these power cell electret boxes, there's your 1,760,000 watts of power, output from the Outer Ring engine alone, not counting the OTC-X1 engine.  That is plenty.

And since the MEG units are much larger, then there would probably be larger resonance, and so the minimum power output can be expected to be 1,760,000 watts in the Outer Ring.  Same concept of amplification applies to the Rodin coil featured on the Warp Drive News page by Jamie Buturf, with amplification of a couple of decimal places.  

​This actually is different from the estimated output on the Outer Ring page ....   The MEG can be seen on the article just below this one.



​
So hold up here ...   1 little electret power cell in milliamps, amplified by a MEG 100 times, would be equivalent to about one tenth of a watt.  So 100 little electret power cells with a MEG, is about 10 watts.  1000 of them is about 100 watts.  So then 40,000 little electrets is about 4,000 watts with a MEG.  Okay.  Well, then maybe the Outer Ring is only doing closer to 100,000 watts rather than 1,000,000 watts ...  upon closer inspection.

So then for a 4,000 watt backyard box power supply, you'd need to make 40,000 little electrets.  Otherwise for something smaller, 4,000 little electrets is about a tenth of the size of a coffee table, with a MEG.  .........  So that would be about the size of a small suitcase (The MEG really is not that big, plus the power cell electrets) to achieve 400 watts always active.

Three or Four of these suitcase-sized units would yield 1200 - 1600 watts.  To get fancy, 2 MEGS could be tested with just 400 little electret power cells, able to fit inside a small suitcase, for 4,000 watts output.  Other MEG units have been measured to amplify in far greater excess than just a mere 100 times the input.

I'm hoping one could make just 100 of those little tedious electret rascals, and use two MEGS or multiple MEGS.  I'm hoping a MEG device can just feed right into another one for linear amplification.  Only one needs to be timed on a mechanical rotor or something, and then all the MEGS wired in parallel or series or something.  Series and parallel connections will still increase the watts, but just trade between volts and amps.

2 MEGS could make 100 electrets do 1,000 watts.  Stuff the whole mess into a briefcase.
​
​

You can see the MEG in the article just below this one, on this page:  https://www.warp-drive-physics.com/free-energy--tesla/tesla-electrogravity-basics


People don't seem to know this ??




​

The need to re-evaluate the laws of physics:


The philosophy of free energy, to say it exists or not is such a stigma it seems. I think there are people who just dont like the term. I won't use the term "perpetual motion," I'll just say a system perpetuates. When there are no moving parts involved, then relative permanency is the word. 

If something generates (creates) energy for many years (like 25 - 50 years lets say) without any power input and without reaction, and without moving parts, would you call it "cool energy?" That would apply especially if the power source didn't heat up. 

Magnets don't get hot. Does that violate thermodynamics if a power generator lasted for 50 years without getting hot due to no internal reaction and no moving parts? 

Can you say that something creates energy under these reactionless conditions without trading mass for power? 

I would have to say that our electret power cell changes the laws of physics; it is the exception in that it works in all the ways physics says it should not.

Pandora's box is now open.



Electret power cells are based on crystalline technology, like in the ancient days of Atlantis.  Some people have used real crystals for power, but that technology was immediately suppressed (raided and stolen) just hours after successful tests.

Well at least NOW, we have something that demonstrates the existence of these physics (physical laws of the universe), that it is real and exists, based on new laws of physics, and new discoveries.


​
​

​Revisited:

I keep having wishful thinking about this and keep having to remind myself if an electret is 1 watt at 1 volt and 1 amp, then 120 of them will be either 120 volts at 1 amp ...  or 120 amps at 1 volt ...   so 10,000 of them is still 10,000 volts at 1 amp, keeping that relation.  Either volts OR amps add depending on series or parallel.  Still looking at a whole room full of them to get anywhere real.  

100 power cells at 100 watts is pretty cool, and it was a good idea to use some form of amplification but ..  using an MVP Bedini generator would be a better approach to this.  At about 15x power amplification, an MVP could amplify 100 watts to 1500 watts.  That's not bad.  Still would require building a whole lot of electrets though.





​
​

​

UPDATED!       (Friday 13, 2018)

Tesla didn't say that Earth is a vast reservoir of negative charge ..  he said the Earth is a vast reservoir of negative electricity.  The Earth's surface charge is a positive charge.  Tesla was smart enough to realize this, that the negative pole of a battery grounded and formed a circuit to the positive charge of the Earth surface (ground).  ....   What he CLAIMED is that Earth is a vast reservoir of negative energy.  Negative electricity is MUCH DIFFERENT than the negative electrical charge! 


I'm borrowing a couple of images here, to illustrate how well known this technology is to one who does just a little bit of research and follows the synchronicities (trail of bread crumbs; one step leads to the next, etc), guided by their own inquisitive mind.

Here we see the MEG, and the Tesla coil, used in antigravity applications, just like how this website describes on the various pages like the Outer Ring page, and the Construction Blog page.

I'm including this article on this page because it relates to Tesla, who in conjunction with Townsend Brown are considered the fathers of electrogravitation.

​ 

You can click on these images for larger detail.  The one on the left is similar to Tom Bearden's MEG (motionless electromagnetic generator), as seen on the various pages throughout this website (Construction blog, the Outer Ring page, and down below at the bottom of the Tesla Power article).  

Here is the direct link to the MEG via the Tom Bearden website:  http://www.cheniere.org/megstatus.htm

Also, Tom Bearden's 69 page "MEG paper" can be found on this link:  http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htm

Some of these types of systems used with an antenna and a ground can become self-oscillating for a while, after being disconnected from its power supply.  In fact, several things will do that.  The MEG made by my mentor did that, and Marko Rodin's systems have demonstrated a spinning magnet continuing to spin inside one of his toroid-shaped coils for a few minutes after the power has been turned off.

​


The image on the right is the Haunebu II ...  It uses a Tesla coil system with electromagnets around the perimeter, similar to the OTC-X1 geometry, but providing vacuum lift up through the coil (similar to what is seen on the below articles on this page).

The Tesla coil will either draw energy up, or down, depending upon the polarity of a secondary actuating winding around the tall coil, in DC configuration (also shown on the Tesla Engineering Physics page).  Superconductivity is demonstrated by using scalar negative energy, longitudinal waves able to travel at around 220,000 miles per second according to Eric Dollard and his team of HAM radio enthusiasts who have measured this speed of parallel and longitudinal waves.

​The Tesla coil is the "magnet in the middle" similar to the MEG-like device on the left image, but it is acting as a static-magnet, however with a moving current.  

Concerning a static magnet applied to building a Tesla system like mine:    It's weird, the secret isn't in the math, but in the ability to physically feel the sensation of the light electric subtle wispy energy. When you start to feel it, then you can build upon it so that it's so big, anyone can feel it. Then you can bring it to life with a static magnetic current. A static magnet is the only way to describe it. It is a moving current, but you can set it in motion like how small fast gears turns a larger slower wheel. But when that large wheel starts to turn, there's tremendous force behind it.

A static magnet is a magnetic field combined with an electrostatic charge, but .......   don't confuse the term "static" with a meaning of "being in one place; immovable."  Static charges is something you have to physical feel to understand.  The best example is one of those plasma balls -- the glass globe with the plasma emanating from the center of a small sphere, seen in movies and at gizmo shops.  When you put your hand on the glass outer sphere, you feel tingly electrical energy.  That is static.  A term Tesla used to describe as being "in the air."  However as plasma is also produced in a near vacuum, static also exists in a near vacuum, convenient for usage of charging a spacecraft hull in a vacuum.  

​A static magnet however is softer than that, and sometimes it feels more like water than electricity, although there is a distinct electrical feel to it.  

​


​In the image on the right, you can see how lift is generated, similar to the impeller on the LAU-X4.  It is also similar to the central accumulator of the OTC-X1.  I wanted to share these relations to better illustrate the simple principles discussed in this website.

​Also, similar to the original concept of the vertical cones approach, using a Tesla toroid on top, energizing the space of the cones inductively, what is happening in the image on the right is the outer hull being charged electrically, and the field shaped by the electromagnets (or resonance coils).  Either resonance coils or electromagnets with a little thickness to them is how the OTC-X1 works.  A spark collapse can still occur, although I am leaning toward electromagnets, because that is the common denominator with coils in the outside perimeter position.  

You'll notice the similarities with Townsend Brown's little 3 foot disks in the Haunebu III.  As seen on the Construction page (not the blog), that a dielectric and magnetic layered hull plating also works, which was also used by Tesla.  The style of construction required to build "Townsend Brown / Tesla" style hull plating is found in the Townsend Brown section on the Construction page, with a link to tests achieved:  https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02576.pdf

More about Townsend Brown can be seen at the bottom of the Updates and Design Improvements page.  It's funny that "stressing the di-electric" easily applies to a Tesla coil as the di-electric.

Although I have never seen any flying Tesla coil, as I've said several times, the aeroframe is a necessary component, along with field coils and a central core.  The bottom of the Tesla coil in the image on the right is a layered capacitor stack.  That works similar to a secondary winding, but the charge is spread out along the plates, yet translates laterally and inductively to the vertical coil.  






Addendum:  

​
Things to note. The Tesla coil touches the airframe so you have the Tesla toroid on top and the whole thing sits inside a similar hollow metal scalar shape - the hull. Its known that the long vertical coil radiates longitudinal waves which is responsible for wireless transmission of power to say, light a lightbulb in a bowl of water 10 feet away. The scalar field is a superconductive field. 

A spark gap has to be employed to change the nature of the energy in a Tesla coil. In the MEG, there doesn't need to be a spark gap. 

This has its basis in the spark collapse of a collapsing electromagnetic field. Without the spark gap in the Tesla system, it does not produce scalar waves. The spark gap changes the nature of the energy from electromagnetic to magneto-electrostatic. This is another example of negative energy in use.

Notice the electrical geometry of the airframe shape in a sphere, containing the Tesla coil and capacitor cage on the bottom. 

The "wings" are an important dynamic to shape the energy flowing over the hull.

Also, the outer coils connect to the airframe just like the output coils act in the MEG.

Mass is reduced with the outer electromagnets employed. The overall geometry of buildup of EM and collapse mimicks this structure: the outer electromagnetic field collapses toward the center superconductively and longitudinally, resonating with the central core.

Since mass is electromagnetic, this resonance action creates a negative mass field, or a negative energy field.

​
Go pick you up a decent store-bought induction coil and hook up a 6 volt lantern battery to it.  That'll be good enough to get you a rapid sparky discharge at a workable frequency.  Then tie in a couple of bare wires (like some 4 inch pieces of a wire clothes hangar) to the output terminals so the spark can arc between them.  Connect your coil start and finish ends to your output terminals (positive and negative), or to the ends of the bare wires.  ...    

It's a simple matter to install air variable capacitors and a tuning coil (might have to make your own, like a good 2 foot tuning coil with a bunch of cylinder-shaped magnets stuffed inside the coil).  Connect your output after that mess, directly to the little test craft.

​
It's so simple, that all you have to tell someone is "magnetostatic lift," and they'd be like, oh! like a charged feather hovering. ... if you tell people about mass reduction, and gravity cancellation, they'd think yer crazy

...   I should note that the capacitor layer is using di-electric plates with thin magnet plates between them, as per the tests of the Townsend Brown effect in a vacuum, explained on the Construction page (not the blog page).




Further update; vacuum chamber testing:

​
Kinda like an electrostatic lifter but different. Put a digital clock inside see if it'll warp time ... that'll check to see if mass is being reduced.

Test it in a vacuum chamber to see if it works like the EM drive. This thing requires an airframe tho. The EM drive didn't. The EM drive didn't charge the outside of the hull but the inside. Although this should demonstrate mass reduction, whereas the EM drive didn't.

​Could make this sucker air tight or add a double hull (another hull layer with air space in between the hulls so it has some air to work with in a vacuum).  Give it a hollow space for air to flow around the hull then return up thru a central hollow pipe thru the capacitors and coil and out the top.
​
The EM drive worked in a vacuum chamber using microwave RF frequency. I think Tesla energy is a lot safer than microwaves.

It can just be treated like an engine, without having to worry about pilots.  Put the top Tesla donut inside the aeroframe.  

I give it two thumbs up for ease of construction (no moving parts), and viability.


​





​


​

There are three things modern science claims are impossible:  an electric wave or current cannot be separate from a magnetic aspect of the wave, energy cannot be generated in a reactionless system, and the third thing I forget.  The nature of Earth batteries shows that two dissimilar metals can become reactionless with no corrosion at a certain distance from each other pushed into the ground; whereas most batteries like simple ones using aluminum and copper will react -- the aluminum will be consumed.  The lack of reaction and therefore consumption of metals is desired for significant reasons, and don't leave a void behind after a metal has been stripped of its electrons and the element disassembled and dissolved.

Experimental setup, shown on the Tesla Engineering page:

My Tesla experiments have showed me that an electric portion of a wave can be separated from a magnetic portion of the wave, and is discussed below in detail.  The experimental setup was the Tesla tower in the yard, the receiving console/pedestal inside the house, and the Tesla tower used a neutral brass ground rod, and the receiving pedestal just had one end of its wire pushed into the ground, outside the house.

That was the OLD setup, not the new one I'm working on, currently.

It was actually very frustrating that I was getting electric volts, but no current would form a magnet through a coil.  The analogue meter depends upon the formation of an electromagnet to work, and try as I may, nothing would happen.  Lightning would induce from 40 up to 80 volts at times in the tower during storms, but once again, no twitch of an electromagnet!  I measured it inside from the receiver, so current was flowing and being induced.  This was very frustrating to me and I began to wonder if somehow the magnetic portion of the wave was being grounded out.  

People have said this is absolutely impossible for this to have happened because an electric part of the wave cannot be separated from the magnetic portion of the wave.  An electromagnetic wave and a flat scalar wave though, they are different, and it is NOT impossible for two waveforms to exist in nature.  The whole point of this new setup is to transform between electromagnetic and flat waves, which is the secret of how it works.

Read below and on the article below this to understand what I'm talking about.

It is reassuring to me to know that this was impossible, because it surely was a thorn in my side to NOT get any electromagnetic current or voltage (only pure electric / electro-radiant, or electrostatic voltage) until I learned the secret of how to polarize (make into two poles) my grounds.  Makes me wish I would have videotaped it, but I had no idea it was so significant. 

On the other hand, some people understand that electroSTATIC current (an oxymoron) can be run along a wire.  Ironically, all it took was changing the material of the ground rods to switch from electrostatic "current" to ELECTROMAGNETIC current.  Meaning that there was a polarity issue involved, but otherwise there was a flow or movement of electricity from the tower to the receiver.  <----  Read this real carefully.  Prior, I was using a brass ground rod at the tower, and just the end of the copper wire of the receiver plugged into the ground (receiver was inside the house and the wire ran outside).  Now, I am using different materials for my ground rods.



One thing to note:  The electric portion, and magnetic portion of the wave cannot be separated (see the Logic of Paradoxes -- Paradoxes of Unity -- on the General Blog page).  The magnet is still there, but it can be hidden, just like a raw block of iron isn't necessarily a magnet, unless it becomes polarized.  The magnetic aspect of a CURRENT, running along a wire creates a spiraling magnetic field around the wire in a direction of travel.  But when you have simultaneous clockwise and counter-clockwise magnetic spirals, then they tend to phase to a zero, but the electric portion running straight and linear along the wire still remains, and becomes an electrostatic buildup on the wire.

Moving an electrostatic buildup can polarize the current to give it an electromagnetic quality (bringing out the magnet), however a current of electrostatic energy can also exist, but instead of penetrating into a coil, it runs along the surface of the coil, such as an electromagnetic coil.  Using insulated magnet wire, however, it would seem that this electrostatic energy penetrates through the insulation; whereas using a wire insulated with plastic or rubber, it does not unless it is of sufficient voltage.  

As seen by Tesla, the electromagnetic compression of the DC current along a power line to the substation (when he was working for Edison) would create blue horizontal lines of electrostatic energy out of the insulated power line wire, penetrating the insulation of the power lines.  So we have these various factors going on, but nonetheless, transformation in an electrostatic coil can occur regardless, even if there is no measurable magnetic quality of a wave.  

It is this unusual quality of radiant energy which allows for this technology to exist, and to work, using vertical coils over the ground as seen on the Tesla Engineering Page.



​
​

​
Discussion:


No one takes into account the nature of electrical CHI ENERGY that can be harnessed thru technology, of which that energy can be felt and known. But I don't know a single soul who can apply mathematical equations to such metaphysical aspects of energy; nor has there ever historically been equations to explain how such energy can be amplified over long distance OTHER THAN GEOMETRY which explains the wave shape of the energy and the interactive action of the energy, and Laws of physics to explain action; but the limitations of our technology to measure anything more than the results .... well there's a difference between MEASUREMENT and predictability.

Can you predict when the wind will blow? If you can make it rain, then you can predict that it will rain, but not how much it will rain because that part is fulfilled by Earth and nature.

Laws of physics are in a logical syntax but not in a format of mathematical equation. An object at rest tends to stay at rest until a force is applied is a LAW OF PHYSICS but not in mathematical syntax for example.

My whole point of this technology has not been to rely on mathematics, but to hone intuition and creative perception. If we cant feel it out and understand it naturally and intuitively, then Humans are DISCONNECTED FROM NATURE.

Math applies to construction and measurement to duplicate the setup but depending on where you are on Earth, the output will be different. What we can count on is that a structure can produce a certain amount of energy. Volts drop before an Earthquake nearly a month in advance from my experiments and later from Eric Dollard's experiments. Just as the wind blows and the waters move, and the flows of Earth chi meridians migrate, energy can be harnessed to do work.

Can math explain God? Maybe logic can help to do so, but there are places where math cannot go. Running collapsing electromagnetic pulses thru static scalar fields is only halfway applicable to mathematics in order to measure the static Earth fields and Earth electrical chi flows, which is my next step to locking this Tesla system down to understand and explain what otherwise a demonstration and physical inspection of the system can reveal much better.

The whole process of science is to solve unknowns, and to make discoveries previously unknown, and to predict future behavior based on past data, and so implying that my work is crap before I've truly made the make-it or break-it discovery is to truly be blind to what this is all about.

People get excited and look and get depressed that the construct is not yet complete, but their emotions are so disrupted in such a viewing that they never look again, nor wish to look further because they CANNOT HANDLE their own emotional responses and energies.

Yes, emotions are part of science because people have emotions, and people create and work sciences creatively.

A logical framework should be understandable when experiment and observation backs it up.
This is how all of our very ancient sciences have been setup, those sciences esoteric and forgotten by man. Some secret societies understand but not all of them.






Some of the weirdest things that happened with my experiments minus the metaphysical and spiritual weirdness:

I was able to release the dam of a buildup of massive electrical charge thru and from my Tesla system by opening up a spark gap on my receiving pedestal. It generated significant electrical static charges. At the tower, a bubble formed underneath from ground up that felt like wading thru electrical water. The electric chi bubble at the tower in the yard and the electrostatic massive charge at the receiver in the house were different. One felt dangerously electrical (inside) the other felt stranger than I had ever felt (at the tower), like vortex energy.

The same effect inside could be duplicated using an induction coil in the way most people use Tesla coils making lightning and sparks. But the issue I was getting was that even tho it felt electrical at the receiving pedestal/console inside (not using the induction coil but drawing it from the tower in the yard), was that there was no usable magnetic wave aspect that measured on a meter.

So it felt like massive dangerous electrical charge like what you don't want to touch powered from an induction coil, but harnessing it naturally without a powered induction coil, it was safe to touch, even tho it felt like dangerous electrical energy. At the tower it did not feel dangerous again; but felt like a vortex from a natural ley-line or whatnot.

So. That was my first issue. What was that electricity that felt like you were gonna get the pis shocked outta you but was safe to touch?

Next was issue with a satellite that I caught red handed.

One evening I detected 1400 volts across my system, it was bouncing on the meter due to rapid frequency of pulses. That was significant so naturally I touched the bare metal of the receiving pedestal. But it was safe to touch even tho it was 1400 volts running thru my coils. It was electrostatic in nature but not electromagnetic otherwise I would have felt a jolt.

So I looked up 1400 volt electrostatic scanning beam on google and found a white paper and parts number for a NASA component on a satellite used for a type of propulsion for "orbital maneuvering and station keeping."

It stayed around. When I plugged the tower into its neutral brass ground, an X would form overhead that looked like clouds. There was some kind of interference waves between my tower and the satellite. My mom called me on the phone telling me she watched a science program on TV showing where NASA satellites were positioned and one seemed to be over where I lived.

So... now I figured this out. My system was harnessing scalar waves - longitudinal flat waves - not electromagnetic waves. And now I learned how to flip the polarity of this wave between electromagnetic and longitudinal/parallel.

Electromagnetic wave is a transverse wave. Parallel and longitudinal electric waves are NOT electromagnetic but are electrical. This form of energy is a negative state of electromagnetism having basis in the wave collapse of the magnetic portion of the wave.

Long story short, a scalar wave can build up energy over distance then be "flipped from negative energy to positive energy" (wave transformation) to generate a lot of energy.

From tapping two points on the ground, a transmission point and receiving point, such a system can be realized similar to how the old telegraph wires were run, sending massive high volts along the wires derived from special ground plates - all free energy.
​
Very simple. But this has to work in conjunction with special Tesla coils, and the grounds are polarized in similar way of Earth batteries.





Parallel di-electric waves run from wire to wire but electromagnetic waves run transverse to parallel wires. 

Eric Dollard and his ham radio team have tested this and found that di-electric waves travel faster than electromagnetic magnetic waves. Electromagnetic waves travel at C .. electrostatic at 220,000 miles per second (roughly the distance from Earth to the moon in one second). ​

Forgive the crappy picture, this came out of an old electro-dynamics book shared by Eric Dollard.  I just drew out my own picture of what was in the book to explain these dynamics.
​

​
​There's also a subtle similarity between volts and frequency. For a wave to travel from space to ground and hold the same volts is characteristic of wave frequency is noteworthy. But I don't pick up all kinds of frequency with radio waves. So the nature of these energies are strange and unusual to most people.

People are AFRAID of this stuff too. The mere mention of "scalar wave" insights terror. But if I call it a flat wave or longitudinal wave, then people look at the science magazine articles about it.

It's odd that the electrical portion of a wave and magnetic portion can become so isolated from each other. But when we deal with dimensional energies then it can make sense that energy can be transmitted thru higher dimensions like actual teleportation of energy. Energy just moves thru the quantum vacuum state of the universe, thru hyperspace or superspace, to re-emerge at a location.

Astral projection and conscious healing energy ... like Reike or the ability to use one's energy to heal another, even at a distance is a prime example of the nature of higher dimensional realities.

People are experiencing this, and was known by the Ancient ones. And it's all energy! And thought and consciousness-created form. 

Using my Tesla system, I experienced a greater reality similar to this aspect of life, one that I don't normally talk about. 

Hyperdimensional technology of such a nature to send energy thru different universal dimensions, negative or ethereal dimensions, should not be seen as impossible to those who already know and operate their chi to do impossible things like healing others or traveling to remote places astrally. These things should not be feared, only respected and lovingly practiced.

Emotion changes the outcome. If fear is the emotion, it is destructive. If peace, calm, and benevolence is the soul's focus of mind, it is uplifting and healing.


​
Sending a magnet thru another dimension thru a chi corridor to manifest at a distance is the basis of hyperdrive interstellar flight, phenomenal energy production, and conscious Ascension.





Necessary Disclaimer:

This experimental setup is in a non-polarized electromagnetic state.  This is a paradox.  Due to the lack of magnetic interaction, this setup was too interactive with biological energy fields, and those consequences are seen in the article below.






Additional thoughts:

I'm rebuilding the Tesla system with a smaller tower and the same console / receiving pedestal .. and just connecting it to the ley-line. And using the principles of the south/negative and north/positive to polarize the energy.

I'll be running a "spark collapse" thru the system too to test amplification.

The system will power a pulsed induction motor thingy just for a test .. and then I'll feed it thru the lines - horizontal wire and ley-line.

There are very few who understand this. I have explained that electricity can exist without a usable magnetic aspect and I've explained the Earth batteries that are reactionless, and one more concept that violates modern physics and no one understands, and no on believes that those two things can exist.

Some understand the concept of a static current tho - a paradox.

Some say its ionic in nature, some of my results, and maybe it is. I mean yeah sure, a charge in air is ionic..

It frustrated the piss out of me in my earlier experiments that I could feel huge charges, get some voltage and run it on a wire but running a current thru an electromagnet would not generate a magnet even tho both ends of the winding were charged. Its like the charge was there but not moving thru the coil I think, although the coil was energized. I got shocked a couple of times of electricity moving thru my body, but then broke contact, touched the tower wire again and the energy was gone but running as long as the circuit was not broken. I even got this result once in a homemade generator hooked to an old capacitor I scrounged out of an old washing machine.. stopped generator and restarted and extra volts were gone.

So using the Earth battery concept is finally giving me electromagnetic current now because there are two poles instead of just the one. 

Everything Tom Bearden published about the active vacuum (the medium is electrically active as Tesla wrote) applies to this.




​

​

Notes:


One of the reasons for my website was to help people to reproduce and reverse engineer the historic OTC-X1, and to validate its existence that it could work.

I think I have accomplished that goal, but finishing the Tesla project would add the last piece of validation. I've had offers to do interviews, I've even had an offer to move to Montana to reproduce one, but it's taken me all this time to get a handle on it.

I'm not going to do any interviews until the project is finished.

This project is meant for the layman, for the common man and woman, who has more potential to understand reason than to understand mathematics. From my experience, I never worried about any math other than geometry concerning any building projects, AND PHYSICS to understand the concepts that got results. 

If you can understand the physics behind how electricity is generated, then generators can be built. But then building them big got a lot of resistance behind having to push past the force of magnetic breaking to force out electricity. Since then, I decided to work on other ways to produce power that didn't have to deal with resistance, such as the motionless electromagnetic generator, and Bedini engines and Tesla natural systems involving electric flows of natural Earth currents.

Learning about wave compression has been interesting. That was the first thing Tesla noticed working for Edison, that electromagnetic compression acted upon the natural scalar electrostatic energy that filled every component, even the power lines .. that when the power was running along the lines out to the substations, horizontal blue electric lines would form along the power line, and the substation would shoot lightning out of it, killing linesmen. After the power arrived, then all that lightning stopped and things got quiet.

That got him thinking that "hey! there is an active electrical medium of Earth surface charge that permeates all things electrically instead of magnetically" ... and this is true because it permeates the trees, the grass etc, electrically. Grass grows at 90 degrees right toward the coils of my system, and I have reversed the "radiant rise" which is the electrical phenomena that causes grass and trees to grow, to actually kill trees (accidently, but scalar weapons are a reality).  Since then, I've learned my lessons in safety.

I am refraining from adding a whole lot of pictures and diagrams because I'm half-ass trying to keep this somewhat proprietary ..  and coming out with publications with images in them to be much more clear.  But in the meantime, this is informative regardless, and how it's usually been done in conventional books, and there are some pictures, and even photos on the other pages of this website.  I just don't want to keep using the same photos over and over because that gets boring.  Not even in Tom Bearden's 69 page active vacuum paper did he really use a whole ton of images.

Although there's quite a few pictures already, and if people want more pictures, they can research what I'm talking about. I'm really not trying to babysit anyone but also teach people how to do their research.  If people don't have time to do their research or duplicate experiments then they'll miss out.  Maybe that's being mean but, ...  I don't want to make this website any bigger because then it'll REALLY be overwhelming to sort through.  That and I want some elements of plausible deniability here.  People really do have to earn these things, and learn to be responsible and informed and discerning -- for reasons I can't always really get into...
​








See the article below but before that, here is PART II ...  which is a bit of a rant like usual, but I just don't care anymore so ...   here goes:


Warning: Rant Alert

Yeah I just don't know about ye ole warp drive physics the website. And honestly I'm getting tired of hearing about how everyone keeps getting attacked. I made that website to share my research, advertise a book, and now its advertising the Tesla free energy project. Yeah I was attacked in a scary way which affected how that website evolved because I was using it to help me heal.

I've developed a framework in negative energy theory to explain how to get the OTC-X1 (Ralph Ring) to work and why it WORKED (past tense), and what we can do with it to make it better, but it's been a huge reverse engineering project mainly to figure out what the hell is going on with it, and it's been a huge undertaking to bring forth a vision. I've discovered many things along the way that are really cool. ... And with negative energy resolved all the complicated relativity, not to mention designed two new engines on the LAU-X4.

The LIGO observatory proof is amazing, talking about how two black holes spinning down to collision has been measured  in real time  to affect time instead of slowing down time to a crawl (which physicists are again NOT TALKING ABOUT) - gravity cancellation ... which pales in comparison to mass reduction in a negative energy field which the Germans have ACTUALLY discovered working outside of university resources.

But.. even tho I organized the home page, described the negative energy systems, made countless updates on the free energy /Tesla page but more importantly explained the OTC-X1 on the Construction blog page basing it on Tom Bearden's MEG (motionless electromagnetic generator) and shared the link to his 69 page MEG paper on the active vacuum .. people either can't grasp the basics or don't know that all these changes have been made, or don't believe that these things have been done?

Before now, we had NO IDEA that a simple electromagnetic collapse was so profound (and im being honest here, most 4 year electrical engineering students don't know what an electromagnetic collapse is), which is what John Bedini based his schoolgirl circuit on - which his earlier version used two alternating capacitors in perpetual motion. .....

So many people are using John Bedini's tech already on youtube, cycling batteries and restoring old batteries not able to be charged again... He should be in every single university textbook.

And honestly the OTC-X1 research is done. From my Tesla experiments and after apprenticing under my mentor I now see whats going on and have a working engineered theory on how to reverse engineer the OTC-X1 and what principles it's using.

I finally understand what the hell Eric Dollard was talking about regarding faster-than-light transmission of scalar waves as a flat wave.. and how to transform it to flip the polarity back into an electromagnetic wave for power amplification, transmission and production.

People aren't grasping that electromagnetic power is a WAVE SHAPE. A flat wave is not electromagnetic but.. transforming these waves is the key to the OTC-X1.  (more on this in the article below)

I finally read about how scalar waves are longitudinal flat waves. I've seen demonstrations of lightbulbs lighting up in a bowl of water submerged 20 feet away from a Tesla coil. The electromagnetic power is transmitted thru scalar waves. My particular application of it is to break it down into its base components to see how it works. ... and I haven't seen anyone as of yet power a Tesla coil from the spark collapse of collapsing electromagnetic fields run on a wire which is what Tesla used, not neon sign transformers. Bedini used the same to charge batteries with the high volt flyback of the EM collapse, and they charged to 12 volts... which no one is talking about.

High volts charge a battery to 12 volts. Why is that? Because the collapse of EM (basis of negative energy) is a wee bit different than a buildup of positive energy.

You know what most people think negative energy is? Virtual particles, and they're trying to harness virtual particles to run a motor or light up a bulb, to do ANYTHING that takes it out of the range of mathematical SPECULATION and put it firmly into the real world!

My mistake in this has been trying to appeal to common people who can't understand and then to teach them so they can realize the Earth isn't flat. That didn't work.

So THEN I tried to appeal to science and describe the technology in terms of unified physics and THAT didn't work because people want to see mathematics on systems that Humans yet have the math to explain, except for a few like Alcubierre who said "yep the math says warp drive is possible if we use negative energy" and that's ALL the math showed.

So now, I've tried to show how it works by using engineering to explain pole-to-pole characteristics of waves and how a motorized device can be built to harness these energies, but without math, people don't understand what energy even is. THAT didn't work.

I've explained energy in terms of metaphysics instead using logic and experiment, but people balk at that because they can't understand energy on a philosophical level using logical reasoning to open their minds...

I might as well just call it what it is - elemental metaphysics engineering - and just build the damn Tesla system and power my house and the farm here .... but instead of being disrespectful and giving the middle finger ... I need to be humble and patient with people, and refrain from insult.

I can explain the same thing over and over from different points of views .... or .... take my own path and walk away from the skeptics, from the drama, and let people figure it out for themselves.

If it works, you'll know about it.     .....   and that will be the final piece of verification to this whole thing.  But I can't do anyone's thinking for them, and I have to adhere to limitations to only what the individual can do for him/herself, or in small groups.  I'm not really doing this to change the world, but just to survive an already changing world.

​







​