Be Advised and Informed please, especially everyone on the west coast of North America, and those who fly the friendly skies along the northern Pacific routes and over the American Midwest.  

​

No two people experience the same reality.

This is put to the test when scientists can be very widely diverging on their studies and measurements of areas like the Gulf of Mexico, or of the salmon count in Alaska.  

These are also examples of the dualistic nature of reality, itself.  But instead of the good and the bad cancelling each other out, there must be a unity of the good and the bad, in order to see the full picture.

What the unity is, is Awareness, Knowledge, and Realization of the consequences of our actions, and of the alternatives that we may embrace, learning from our mistakes, to project a positive future for Humanity and life on Earth.  We are lucky, as a specie, to see the good and the bad, and be wise enough to learn from our mistakes, and to learn not the differences, but the unity of what all this means, and how we can determine a direction of where we now grow, in a new age of meaningful existence.


​However in the above video, at the end, the narrator says that the good news is that the EU has "committed to building the first new nuclear power plant in the EU since the disaster, SO AT LEAST WE'RE MOVING FORWARD."   

I do not think that building nuclear power plants is in any way a direction of moving forward in a path of Human evolution.

So often, Humanity has been warned against the use of nuclear power, if you follow the messages that Humans have been told from those amongst the stars.  You might believe the Earth is flat, or that no intelligent life other than on Earth exists anywhere else in the universe, but that is no excuse to be blind, or stupid.


​Things need to change.  We need full disclosure and transparency.  People need to open their minds, understand that we are spiritual beings living in a light-based energy reality, that we are not alone in the universe, and we need to ditch the mind control and educational programming of applied skepticism, and realize that if Humanity as a whole does not change its habits, no new doors will open, but ALL doors will close, on EVERYONE living and breathing on this planet.




Additional:

I do understand that some levels of radiation is good for health, btw ... lots of sandy areas are naturally radioactive.  Being out in the sun actually energizes your body's electrical frequency, raising it, which promotes health. That is a healing aspect of natural radiation.  

​Until there can be actual determinable results though in compare/contrast with the radioactivity on beaches around the world however, then can it really be said that we know enough about this situation at this present time?  That is something to consider, and something to be continued in further research.  Also in the matter of ingesting radiation versus surface penetration of radiation on the skin, there may be differences.

Monoatomic elements for examples that are not metals so as much, but elementals, also are not very well understood by the public at large, and is somewhat of a subject matter beyond this website's purpose.  ultimately, I do not wish to promote fear, but only the pursuit of unbiased knowledge.


​





​

I may add more to this article later.  

I did want to say this though, about the secret space program technology:

I've known that the SSP was given difficult technology on purpose, just because of the huge difference with their nuclear powered ships and heavy exotic matter rings versus the simplicity of the technology we inherited from Tesla - the natural technology of the Human creation, rather than messy tech from ET who really doesn't want us to have it.  

It's pretty obvious, in fact.

There is a natural flow of energy that we CAN feel.  These energies have been kept from people, because they activate other frequencies inherently native to the Human DNA information layers.  

One of the reasons for the discipline of Self-Realization is to activate these dormant and atrophied genetic structures; and remote some of the more rigid form of ancient control codes. 

It is also obvious that Human scientists just don't understand a technology that acts beyond the material illusion layer of the reality construct.  They want to cling to material physics, because they were wrongfully encouraged to believe that our material physics just isn't advanced enough, but eventually we'll understand.  

Material physics is not but the framework of the box of the material of things -- all of positive form, meaning an object-based physics, whereas the real science is applied in nonphysical energies.  The form of energy and mass in higher frequency harmonics (fractal dimensions) is to what the technology of hyperdrives and warp drive pertains -- dealing with negative form, and with hyperdimensional flows of energy in natural curves instead of angles (this also as Thoth wrote in the Emerald Tablet).  (I have always questioned the nature of flying triangles and pyramids because the angles create points of instability; yet strangely of a crystalline geometry base -- the paradox of circular flow)

As it stands, we have disclosed hyperdrive and warp drive technology, simplistically and naturally derived from the intelligent perception of the flow of energy and conscious form.

It takes experience to be mature . . .   to be able to communicate with other species in spite of all our Human limitations.



When you put all this information together, everything that's on this website (some videos and links aren't around, though, but if you research it you can find that information), of which it mostly covers everything, and even gives us a bit of a reflection to be able to see ourselves from a point of view we would not otherwise know . . .   then you can see just how impossible it is to understand this technology of warp drive, without also having other inter-weavings of information to give consciousness a practical frame of reference.

There is a book list for recommended reading on the home page.  

Because we are conscious beings, the information layers of the universe (the video above also gets into that) willl become accessible, the more ones consciousness aligns with the universal life-codes and conscious framework of light.  Having a desire to understand physics (and meta/para-physics) is particularly useful for aligning all the universal fractal dimensions of action, creatively with one's DNA, which is limited only to ones perception; and perception is not limited to the mind..
​




​



​

The Light is Dawning.  Good Morning.  See through the Illusion.

​

The I'm right and you're wrong argument is a toxic argument. I'm not saying you gotta accept each others' views .. but ya gotta accept that other people do have different views. I personally don't see that being evolved has to do with what you know. "Pride ye not in your knowledge O man." Being evolved is your ability to not lose reason when you lose an argument, and not resort to anger to get yer point across.

The ability to own your emotions and not give anyone the power to bring your emotional voltage down is also a mark of being evolved, rather than being advanced.  These lessons afford us an opportunity to grow.  

You don't have to prove someone wrong, or prove yourself right, because that is a tiny victory, which serves the ego more than the soul. Ideally, if you all can validate each others thoughts and feelings and understand where each other is coming from, then that is what peace and love embodies.  It's when one chooses not to understand where the other is coming from is when the heart grows cold.

I guarantee when you wake up the next day and realize how your words and deeds have hurt those you care about, you will feel far worse regret than BEING hurt... that's what being evolved means to me.  If one man far away whom you've never even met has so much power as to tear your family apart .... then that too is not the fault of that one man, who does NOT have such power ...

Also.. if I may ... judging how much compassion a man has or doesn't have, because WE have compassion for others, is truly self-defeating, for that is when one loses one's own compassion. One man does not hold power over millions of people's lives. It is the people themselves who hold that power over their own, and share that power within the community. We cannot judge the hardships of others either, because out of hardship is where the greatest advancements and evolution of the Heart and Spirit come. When people HAVE to work together to survive and thrive, then that is God's Blessing upon them.

In this world, many things have to change. It's not going to be pretty to witness. But we cannot be afraid. We are not there standing in Puerto Rico ourselves. We only know that the media says this or that is bad or good .. and the media's job is not to cast judgment, because as soon as that happens, the truth is distorted, and controversy has reared its ugly head which requires investigation to get to the truth.

When people have to work together to survive and thrive then egos quickly disappear, and people come together, and your enemy becomes your brother and neighbor. Those whose egos cannot handle such a necessity of life, will become a thief and outcast, scrounging for scraps of food, water, and shelter. It is not Divine Will that we destroy each other. The Divine Will is Love. And if it takes hardship to realize that, then that too is The Divine Will.

The same applies to the fires that burn.  The reflection of seething egos and angry response to diversity is the truest origin of those fires.  Those fires burn in everyone's lives daily, until ego (pride, jealousy, control, etc) is burned down to the ground.

It has been known for a while now, that these disasters and destructive events may be the only thing that saves Humanity from itself, forcing people to have to acknowledge each other and work together in the Spirit of Love, cooperation, and compassion -- Truth of Life  (rather than the alternative).

Everything you accuse another of doing, also, you are guilty of doing it yourself. Law of Attraction. Truth of Reflection.  Inner and Outer Creation.
​

Edited and updated (11/24/18)

​

​Electrical warfare on the people of America?

​
I really did not want to do a huge write-up on this ...  This stuff is becoming way too common place, almost cliche' with new ways to inflict more destruction and conspiracy theories saying it's not normal, when it is normal.


So many people are talking about the California fires not being natural.  After being skeptical at first, I did some research, looked at hundreds of photos, and listened to what people were telling me.  Here is one particular article which I found very interesting:



http://www.starshipearththebigpicture.com/2017/10/13/jim-stone-california-fires-were-not-wild-they-were-engineered/


There are WAY too many people who are wide awake now, and see what's going on.  However, there are many people who are quite clueless and naive to what fires can actually do .....

​

​Here's an exploded view of the "after" photo:

​

​
Let me share something I received from my friend, Ernest:


​
​"Note. Concerning the latest suggestions that the current California fires were started with DEW direct energy weapons, I submit the following which came to me from a scientist that is currently involved in this exact research and a close friend. I totally trust his analogy concerning the trees which has sparked this debate. They will remain anonymous to protect their privacy.


Hi Ernest, Interesting footage! It is pretty amazing seeing what fires can do. I guess I have to say that it doesn’t surprise me that much that there are still trees standing and alive after an interface wildfire. If you want to see some other historical wildfires that went into urban areas, and compare how much is left of houses vs the other infrastructure vs trees you can google “fort mcmurray wildfire aftermath” “slave lake wildfire aftermath” “Okanagan wildfire aftermath”. All of them have lots of trees still standing, and some still green.

A couple things of note: houses typically burn from firebrands falling on top of them, and lighting their roofs. Trees don’t have the same surface area, so flaming things carried by smoke in the air don’t tend to light them on fire. Once a roof is on fire there isn’t much you can do. Also, we are pretty used to seeing houses burned in urban areas, where firefighters showed up at some point and managed the fire. In situations like this, the houses are often (sadly, but what can you do) left to burn without anyone putting it out partway through. The whole structure burns to the ground, because essentially everything in houses is flammable or can melt.

Trees are adapted to fire, and while yes some species are very flammable (like pines) they are ALWAYS still standing after fire. Trees are NEVER consumed in forest fires. A lot of those standing trees were somewhat burned; I don’t totally agree that some of the ones pointed out were unburned. Yes, some were even green, but because of their structure (small and narrow, not big and flat like a house) and how wet they are (lots of live sap in trees!) they are still standing after fires.

Fires often burn with mixed severity, even in trees. This is my favourite photo of variable intensity/severity wildfire, from up in NWT.

None of us were there, and I’m not walking around on the ground now, so it’s very hard to confidently say what happened. But, essentially, I would chalk it up to structural differences between trees and houses, and the fact that houses that burn in forest fires are usually burned by falling flaming debris, not by a wall a flame. It’s just not a continuous enough fuel to carry a “crown fire”, like we see in the boreal. They also often light each other on fire this way! But, isolated single trees that aren’t meeting a surface fire are just not that likely to burn."





PRELIMINARY (PRE) CONCLUSION:

Arson takes many forms.  Sometimes, accidents do happen as our technology becomes very advanced, and not enough oversight is present to safely determine how it should be used.

These fires, in my opinion, were started deliberately, but not intentionally.  If energy technology was involved, it was very likely an accident.  Tesla had teleported a large energy charge to Siberia back in his day which caused a very, very, very large explosion.  It was purely an accident, an unintended consequence.  However, to put people's fears at ease (mine included), this was an isolated event, and just like any other fire, it does not mean the world is going to end.

These instances are being blown up out of proportion as people begin to wake up and see what's going on in the world, regarding secrecy and disclosure.  

This is an example of how people's fears can run a muck in a pre-disclosure world, and in a partial post-disclosure aftermath......   By "aftermath,"  I mean, there has been some disclosure, but more people are aware that many inventors over the years have indeed been killed for coming out with great achievements. 

This is another aspect in how the world must change and adapt to new and higher frequencies and standards of harmonious living,  without the onslaught of the control paradigm of greed and tyranny which no one is asleep to, any longer.

I would say it's a safe bet that most people who are balanced, intelligent, and thoughtful, do indeed know things like, that our mainstream media has no more credibility, and that censorship and the demonetizing of youtube content is an attempt to shut people up, but it is an attempt in vain.  

Yes, some people are still "asleep" and opinionated, and lack seeing the full picture.  However, people are not dumb as a rule, although people can be dramatic and let their fears run over everything they try to accomplish.

....  just like wildfires blazing.



​
This is also a practical example as to why we need disclosure, because people have already found out about many things, and these things now need to go public so that the people can see that there is some responsibility and integrity behind these new realities that we face in these times today.

​Yet with disclosure also comes paranoia as people now think that they are victims to advanced technology, which pushes the disclosure agenda in the back so people won't panic.

We're not as smart as we think we are.  We're destroying our planet.  The lies and deceit that is nearly openly declared these days by politicians and bureaucrats has seriously gotten people's attention. 

What people want, are to be able to manage their own lives, without any interference from things that we don't want, such as the banning of the internal combustion engine as Europe has threatened to do, or the forced use of standardized technology, that we are all forced into using, and that we've had to adapt to use, and now could be forced again into another type of technology.  We want the choice, I do believe it is fair to say.

We don't want to be denied the choice any longer, either, it is ALSO fair to say.

We would have had antigravity nearly at least 50 years ago had it not been stolen by the MIC (military industrial complex) and other agencies.  We want to feel safe to come out with free energy and other advancements without the threat of death to inventors who make discoveries.  I was practically handed a list of inventors no longer living who had invented amazing things, of which those things have been kept tucked away in private and passed down to others in secret, to preserve our future for whenever THEY decide the time is right. 

Secrecy has brought dishonor.  It is the secrecy of the shadow groups hidden behind fronts of various 3-letter agencies that has been the real threat to "overthrow the monetary system" as the Feds told Otis T. Carr and his group long ago.  When scientists are no longer paid for their inventions, but they are stolen; and scientists have dodged microwave beams that nearly ended them just because they wouldn't merely "give" their technology away, and weren't told why secrecy requires no paper trail, without offering honorable reasons for signing nondisclosures to protect the secrecy, without fair exchange and compensation and trade to support secret agencies and shadow groups (without being given the choice to protect secrecy, causing harm to people all over the world), of which THAT is the root of those who would dishonor fair exchange and trade which is a small overthrow, not on behalf of ordinary people, but a dishonor to a system of fair trade and exchange (monetary system) on behalf of the SHADOW GROUPS THEMSELVES --  then THAT is the dishonor.  

We want the life that we are not herded into like cattle, but free to choose and to DECIDE what is best for ourselves, not for our neighbors.  ....   otherwise the wild fires that rage won't be able to be doused any longer by good intentions and false promises, for example as seen by the recent uprisings in Germany and France that threaten civil war unto Europe.

These fires are DEEPLY symbolic.  If knowledge is no longer valuable, then we are only existing as slaves to the elite, to the globalists, to the New World Order.  Trillions of dollars have been stolen from the people who could be living lives benefited by technology, where people can live healthier and happier and longer, have more opportunity and work less hours so that we can spend that time on the things that truly matter in life, like love, joy, and harmony, and have the chance to not overpopulate by establishing off-world colonies that are not slave colonies.  

Back in the 50's, we were all but guaranteed that we would make more money, have more opportunity, and work far less hours, all due to technological advances in advanced farming and automation, and to have the opportunity to live in abundance without having to scrounge tooth and nail for every penny .......  but to be able to live where basic necessities like food, shelter, and clothing, and education and healthcare were a given to an enlightened civilization ...  where work was an option not a burden to bare under the yolk of CORPORATE DEBT ENSLAVEMENT.  

When will enough be enough?  When will we be living on a credit-based system, instead of DEBT-based?

When can we devote time to higher learning and higher achievement without sacrificing everything and making too many compromises especially when the children are at stake?  

​When will enough be enough?

​ 


Read the Comments!



_______________________________________________________________________________________
​
​
New photos are rolling in.....

​In reference to this above photo:

​http://www.sfchronicle.com/local/article/Watch-as-Berkeley-firefighters-arrived-in-Santa-12279786.php

Notice it (this is the K-Mart the firefighters drove up to) burned from the inside out ...   this is what high-tech warfare looks like on American soil.  However, it is ALSO what out of control urban fires fueled by high winds and drifting embers ALSO look like, and is what the aftermath of the 2012 fires looked like in Oklahoma.


This below however regarding 911 was due to energy weapons, and that has been shown without a doubt when structures literally turn into vapor, filmed on video, with NO fire involved.
​
​

More evidence rolling in ......  The above was the gas station seen in the firefighter's video.  The fire fighter's video was pulled apparently.  But In the Santa Rosa fire (not the Paradise fire), the fire fighters were called in from a neighboring city on a grass fire.  2 hours later when they got there, the whole town was burning.  There were strong winds, so the fire quickly got out of control.

These buildings above were the result of large golf ball-sized embers carrying for miles and landing on tar roofs, catching the buildings on fire.  Sprinklers wouldn't help when the fire burns from the roof down.  That's also why asphalt bridges burn, because asphalt is a petroleum product, and you get it hot enough and it combusts, and gets so hot it warps steel I beams. 

None of these fires are doing anything that fire doesn't normally do in dry and windy California conditions.  The DEW aspect is maybe 1% involved in these fires, otherwise the fires propagate themselves naturally. 

Stone buildings can completely incinerate and disintegrate to fine powder, burning from the inside out like an oven, and that is a common site to see regarding the mysterious ways of fire.  We have seen that on fires in the Midwest quite often, if not hundreds of times over the past 20 years.

People thinking that microwave weapons and lasers are burning the houses to the ground and that is otherwise not normal in a fire are very ignorant in ways of fire.


The video below can be found at this link:

https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/Watch-as-Berkeley-firefighters-arrived-in-Santa-12279786.php​

​

It's compelling enough for me, at this point.  In my opinion, there's enough people now aware of these things that I don't really have to sugar coat it anymore.  I really don't know what to think of this.  


Verizon wireless in California is now using "temporary microwave technology" in northern California to "help people connect," one news report showed.  Microwave ovens tend to cook things from the inside out.  Here's an article that relates:


​http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2017/10/proof-ca-fires-started-by-haarp-deep-state-insanity-3562611.html


From Lee Sawyer:  "Does anyone remember my announcement last week!!!??
(According to an occult researcher) 
I said first Santa Rosa (Rose) then Santa Cruz (Cross) IE: Rosy Cross = Rosicrucian 🌹✝️
And well. There ya go!"


Portugal and Canada have the same thing happening, with more evidence of blue electric flashes starting urban fires.


What good are TR-3B's when they can't even prevent attacks on U.S. soil from happening at any time?  All this shows is that we are powerless to prevent attacks on U.S. soil.  The entire NAVY space warfighter patrol is a huge joke!   And you know the aftermath is going to end up as new laws passed to restrict air space and prevent experimental aircrafts or private space programs from EVER getting off the ground, and they're going to hammer us with restrictions and more rights violations in an attempt to crush us, and it'll just end up with people resisting these things and being killed, until there is nothing left in the world, because people will not bow down to tyranny!


​http://exopolitics.org/illegal-military-research-and-development-in-antarctica/


​




​

​

Update (9/5/18)

You Create Your Own Reality



Yes, this is the thing that no one wants to hear because it usually means you can't be a victim to a supernatural force, or to situations involving others, or whatever.

This is one thing that will be harder to keep in focus due to the unknowns of advanced technology and secret space programs being made known.

It's the release of advanced technology which throws people for the loop . . . that adds another variable to the equation of people's normal perspective of causality.

Let me reference this image:

Some people may say this:

"Not all of the people in California are asleep. Some have gone public saying that prior to the "house fires", they see what they describe as "blue lightning" or a blue laser, but no plane is visible. I found out weeks ago that the planes have cloaking technology built into them."

However ...


​The controversy is real. But no one has considered how fire is an elemental energy, and all elemental energy is driven by consciousness? 

Some people managed to save their homes. But many evacuated, and weren't there to witness how the fire moved.

People need ladders and long hoses to wet down their roofs from flying embers. Most are not going to think like that. They wont get their drones out, watch the fire and apply water in community effort AND the water lines lose pressure and electricity goes out so these houses can burn from flying embers. 

The people create their own realities and are victims to where they blame this as an unknown attack from "human gods with technology" instead of realizing that they do not have the ability to remedy their own situations.

There's not enough people remaining behind to battle the fires and share what they know.

​Plus the system of power and water infrastructure in these smaller cities is ill equiped for reality to happen.

Humans typically are not connected to nature anyway. This is the result.


​
We have KNOWN that many will not survive the shift unless they are forced to adapt and change.

​We have KNOWN that disaster has to happen to force people to work together to survive the frequencies -- for the highest good of all life everywhere which implies that maybe this is a different kind of attack by ones own specie.

Cities are not designed with firebreaks, and the fire departments are scattered too far apart ill equiped to battle nature. 

Fire is nature. It can be started by however but once its going, it is alive and has a mind of its own - elemental form of consciousness-energy-matter

What we see is the arrogance of Humanity happening, claiming victory over nature but being humbled by nature.. oh yes, it can happen to those fair cities.. the city is not built to repell magnitudes of natural disasters.

Man-made natural disasters involve Humanity's agreement and harmony with nature; with Earth.

New Orleans is a prime example. The city was warned 15 years in advance to reinforce their dam, that the Earth's weather is changing because Earth is changing and our Star is changing.

This forest fire also looks like it jumped the valley and landed on the other side, looks like a small burnt patch; heat rises.


...  


To sum it up:

Ya also gotta think about it.. Creative Consciousness. Everything is so chaotic in Cali, people are chaotic, there's disruptive vibration there, political fighting and stupidity ... that churns up the energies that is associated with the fire elemental. The volcano is heating up in the American Northwest, too. All of that is caused by Human consciousness -- the energy of manifestation, of reality creation.  People's emotional states has GREAT impact upon nature, AND upon radioactivity.

Long ago, Coast to Coast AM, Art and George used to do consciousness experiments to steer hurricanes and whatnot.  It WORKED, but due to the nature of Human focus with fear as an attachment, and without refined focus and Zen, there were unintended consequences, namely a bunch of lightning that caused fires.  One disaster was traded for another.  I believe it was George Noory who hosted the experiments.  After the unintended consequences (one of Art Bell's most hammered points), George stopped the experiments.

Princeton E.G.G. experiments also show how consciousness is an interconnected part of any world event.  

This is one of the reasons why things are classified, because of the power of Human creative consciousness, unrefined, unshaped, and relentless as one of the most powerful creative forces in the entire universe.  People create their fears; people create their loves.  But people RARELY create upon knowledge and reflection upon the Truth, which is hardly understood when people think the Earth is flat.  



​
____________________________________________________________________
​

Fires continue to burn California  --  America under attack?    update 11/12/18


There is more information all over the internet at this point about the California fires that continue to burn in impossible and never-seen-before ways, suspect of DEW energy weapons from the space solar power transmitters in orbit.  

Some information has already been debunked and removed from this article, although there may or may not be any truth regarding some bridges of asphalt and steel have also burned . . .   

What is true is that a lot of coastline is burning right now, along with rural areas, so literally civilization in California is being burned out.  California is responsible for 40% of American agriculture (food supply).  We are in trouble!

As the informed reader should be aware of, fires burning associated with electrical infrastructure, things made of metal, and even concrete and steel is a repeat of 9/11.  EMP, microwave and energy (scalar) weapons are quite capable of doing this.  Eye witness reports of plasma balls and portable electronics (like cell phones and battery-powered door locks) going out associated with these fires in California keep coming forth.  


​
It's events like this which justify public warp drive spaceports.  ... that and Tesla tower systems that detect Earthquakes up to a month prior, and detects voltage from energy output beamed from space . . .   That is actually a very fair market usage for Tesla tower systems, instead of for creating energy, but for detecting and monitoring Earth energies and electrical energies that interface with Earth through the "tall coils" that can be pinpointed to a location in space.

I don't know exactly what's going on but, between simple microwave beams, concentrated "solar" beams and lasers, I wouldn't rule out scalar weapons.  Bridges on the other hand, well again, people are doing a fairly good job of documenting these things, but a lot of that is on Facebook, and not on Youtube or dedicated websites for news and science.  Local news picks up these weird stories, but so far there does NOT seem to be any serious investigation by "men in black" agencies, like you'd think there should be considering these events.

AND ACTUALLY we saw the use of scalar weapons (the same energy type used in John Hutchison's experiments, the same energy type used in electrogravity) actually DID touch the Earth causing firefighter's scotts tanks to blow up, and caused cars to levitate up and end up being perfectly balanced on wooden fences, during 9/11.  So ..   it's still a little mysterious as to how scalar energy interfaces geometrically with Earth electrical energy, otherwise than in vortex, spins, spirals, cones and straight line boundaries (standing waves) . . .   The only thing really mysterious about the energy is polarity itself, since polarity is strictly electromagnetic rather than longitudinal, but longitudinal waves do demonstrate a "weird polarity" that has yet been completely mapped.



Is there some kind of interdimensional war going on through California portals or something that either targets Human civilization or results in collateral damage to Human civilization?  

Seems there are signs of good faith from the "secret govt" these days so is this event to be assumed to be yet another elite psychopath globalist drama to wipe out all but 500 million of Humanity and otherwise wage war on nations in order to gain wealth and profit ... ?   ...  or is this really some kind of war going on interdimensionally, started by Humans who must have sent a nuke somewhere that they shouldn't have?
​


People are wanting to blame DARPA and Lockheed-Martin on the attacks in California, which makes no sense.  American defense agency and beloved American corporation would just not do this to their own families for one thing.  We need to look for the answers beyond the Earth.

What we don't know is about the treaty with the breakaway civilization (secret space programs), and if this is a secret war designed to hold the American govt hostage to bow down to the secret space program control.


​
The reason why I suggest that ...   Yes, California has been subject to international politics, control, tactics, and agendas of the elite and of the wealthy, traded around in secret agreements and people's lives gambled as pawns as assets of financial liabilities traded for power and gain...  

If the defense contractors and agencies can do anything about it to prevent these fires with their very advanced technology that they don't let us have, well ...  these fires are also an attack on the monetary system!  The energy of the people itself is attacked.  Instead of the men in black agencies taking technology away from citizens who create amazing things, why aren't they defending citizens from technology used against them to start fires for purpose to burn up civilization?

The Agenda 21 zones are being burned up!  But there's more collateral damage along established coastline civilization ..  I mean ..  seat of American heritage . . .   home of the most beautiful peaceful beaches pre-Fukashima radiation contamination AND after ..  doesn't that have value to defend?  The fires aren't just going to stop with the Agenda 21 zones, either.  Economic sanctions on the whole world isn't going to make up for this loss-in-progress.....

It's a sick world but damn!  Can't we at least enjoy some time left with our beautiful radioactive beaches while it LASTS????  But no..  There has to be fire tossed on top of gasoline for California. ... 

Honestly, it's hard to tell what's going on.  Maybe this is the civil war that Russia claimed America was currently going through ...?   It's not really a "civil" war though (why authorities in Russia said America was gonna go through a civil war honestly I have NO idea, for the record) ..  more like some kind of secret war against the American public.  I'll bet though if the political situation in California weren't so corrupt, then no fires would be burning, also, for the record.

How can entire towns and cities and urban sprawl be burned up in California of all places when they are so used to dealing with firefighting is beyond me.  No Midwestern town or city would EVER suffer this damage.  And most of the shingles in California aren't shingles, but are Spanish tile architecture!  That's stuff that doesn't burn.  They IMMEDIATELY need to build more fire stations, and have more trucks delivered with no title or registration bureaucracy issues that hold back deployment for 2 years on any new truck, either.

These fires could be blamed on pure bureaucracy!  California could just be so corrupt that this is literally a reality of the bureaucrats' making.



In the 2012 fires here, we saw burning embers carried a mile away to catch other houses on fire <--- True Story.  A lot of the urban development in California is burning also from neighboring home fires being so intense it busts out the windows of nearby homes and catches drapes and furniture on fire, so each home burns more from the inside out.  

It's not like there's some craft overhead shooting houses up.  Hot embers fall on a tar roof of some corporate building and up in flames it goes.  So please keep that in mind.


​
I've lost houses I've stayed at and built in California.  Friends have lost their homes.  Very dear monuments and treasures have been lost, and people have lost, and it's terrible terrible terrible!


There needs to be an ARMY OF FIREFIGHTERS AND TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT deployed in California EVERY CITY BLOCK!  And firefighters need to stick to their zones I think, instead of driving 2 hours to another city leaving their home city "undefended" which is also one of the things that has happened in Ventura.  

I would even say the MOST sensible thing to do, is that everyone in California needs to become a volunteer firefighter, and get equipment and then go from there.  It's obvious that California is now an active "burn zone" so what is there to do except to go and FIGHT FIRE.

Clean up your forests, conduct loud and noisy fire drills through rich neighborhoods that fought against that fire station going in because they don't like sirens, and suck it up!  If it turns out to be energy weapons, then you will know for sure when there is enough fire-fighting coverage, otherwise California will be devastated and it's just a matter of A SHORT time.

Fix your fire codes.  Your houses are crammed way too close together.  Urban sprawled cities look obviously to be easily incinerated, from just like a single match tossed on the ground, anywhere in California.  Obviously Agenda 21 was never able to work anyway, because the fire insurance would be way too high. 

Work together to conserve water while an active zone wets down the roofs of vulnerable houses.  Work with the fire departments for residential fire training perhaps?  Conduct city-wide drills.  Everyone go outside and watch for embers when there's a fire nearby.  There's water issues in California that need to be solved.  Pump in ocean water to the coastlines for designated fire-fighting infrastructure.  Build large water tanks for residential fire-fighting spread out in residential zones.  It may look unattractive, but should bring the property value up!  Many aspects of civilization will have to practically change overnight it seems for most of the world out of necessity for survival and not just by fire, especially if everything happens first in California before it hits the rest of the world.

​California, we will be watching you.




...



The Breath of the Dragon
​

​
California Santa Ana winds -- the fire winds that blow from the desert east out to the coast every Autumn time (hot beautiful winds) .. As Earth comes alive more, those winds become the breath of the Earth Dragon.   ...  electrical Earth chi is coming alive more and is being agitated by mankind's misunderstanding of energy, too. 

The fires burn regardless of the mysterious ways they historically start (every year in the Autumn time, California "breath of the dragon" has ALWAYS started fires that blow along certain pathways over the hills; but it is only during these times that the fires are entering the cities and burning up houses).  Why the fires burn is because of the intense conflict between the peoples in California, and how they work with nature.  It's highly symbolic of the conditions there of Big Money being consumed, and politics and political economics run a muck.

People want their big beautiful homes and fruit tree groves; California is a beautiful desirable place along the coastline mega-cities.  This is part of the Great Purification prophecized long ago.

The dragon archetype is specific to living energy, chi, electrical chi, and intelligence, as well as the physical form of the dragon, but it's the ENERGY ITSELF that is undeniable, of which most fear and have no understanding of it unless it is felt, lived with, adapted to, schooled in, etc.  The Drukpa dragon lineage for example was founded by monks in Bhutan ..several monks saw 6 dragons rising from the earth and it began to rain flowers. .. they took that as an suspicious sign and founded the Drukpa Linage.  Dragons are not evil, nor destructive as an absolute.  Most of the ancient cultures view dragons as the founders of culture and civilization and knowledge, messengers between Heaven and Earth.  

Love is both light and dark energies; spare the rod, spoil the child . . .  how to teach the benefit of consequences for the betterment and education/wisdom of children for example, so we don't take that ignorance out into space with us that comes back on Earth destructively.  The Purification isn't to punish people for sinning, but to teach how to live wisely with nature, if you think about it in that light.


​The first round of Cali fires were started by electrical phenomena according to eye-witnesses. But these new fires are during Santa Ana conditions (El Diablo conditions are the strong Santa Ana winds); and also these new fires are infrastructure issue-related.  Not every fire has the same cause.   Malibu has burned so often over the past 50 years no one will sell fire insurance there, and it's surprising anyone would want to live there, also to shed a healthy perspective that isn't ripe with paranoia and fear.


​
​
Although . . .  I keep going back and forth on this but I'll just leave this video here..  and note right away it shows images of subdivisions surrounded by forest, with perfectly green lawns, but the houses are burned to the ground, dustified.  Cars abandoned and flipped on the roads, all burned to a crisp . . .  the more I see the news about this, and how it's timed with yet again, MORE ELECTION FRAUD, along with the fact that the Tesla and warp drive physics of this website are going completely ignored by mainstream, I'm starting to freak out a bit.

As you watch this video, it's no stranger to Californias that the Feds have been trying to do away with some of the northern water reservoirs which also provide hydroelectric power to like 70,000 homes in those areas.  The local Sheriff departments have noticed this and commented as well, and some of them had stopped sending out foreclosure notices due to entire smaller towns becoming like ghost towns, and that was reported several years ago.

It was also reported some of the reservoirs that people enjoyed boating on were purposefully drained, during the fracking controversy that polluted the water tables.  So this has really been going on for some time, now.  ....  I keep getting a feeling that things are worse than I ever thought. . .   and I really hate to think that this is warfare that the globalists are purporting on the common man, but ...  well ..  hopefully this video actually stands and doesn't get deleted like several others.  

Mt. Shasta California also has some of the highest concentration of aluminum in the soil changing the PH balance, killing the microbes, entering the food and water supply, and one family has a little girl who has so much aluminum concentration in her blood stream (like tens of thousands parts per million) that they are wondering why she is still alive at all, caused by chemtrails.

A friend also just told me about the Gulf War, where Iraqi eye-witness accounts tell of UFO's in the skies burning their trucks to a crisp using particle-beam like weaponry.  

I try to rationalize this stuff away, but EVERYONE in California are saying the fires are not natural, although some are saying it's not a "conspiracy" or a purposefully malevolent act, but it is certainly not a flat earth argument.  I've deleted some of the claims I couldn't back up however, like bridges catching on fire, made of concrete and steel...   In any case, this may be an ongoing investigation.  But the evidence brought to the table so far may very well indicate an attack on American soil.  I try to stay away from that line of thinking though because I catch a lot of flack for it.  

​
There was an eye witness in the fires there local in California who I heard in fact that barely got out in time, and the winds were blowing fierce and sparks were flying everywhere and he was driving through it, and everything was just burning. one house would catch on fire then another ... some people living there through those fires and in those areas well tell you without a doubt it's NOT because of DEWs.

Fires are so hot and the houses so close together that the fire breaks through the windows of the next house and catches the curtains and furniture on fire and the house burns from the inside out.

I have firefighter friends who have seen hundreds of fires and have looked at many of these fire videos of California of the "dustified" houses and they tell me that they've seen that type of thing hundreds of times before, like the lawn being burned only a few feet from the house, but always a few days later the rest of the lawn browns out...  Houses leveled to ash, everything gone with maybe a pipe or some piece here and there sticking up but may be hard to see unless you have a view eye-level on the ground standing in front of the house.

Aluminum rims melting isn't such a big issue either, because that happens all the time.  Car wrecks on the freeway will melt aluminum rims.  Just visit any junkyard in the midwest.

A house fire can be VERY VERY HOT.

So ...  this is at LEAST what the reality currently "LOOKS LIKE" . . .   and there are some things to see.

The above left rabbit and animals from Portugal is disturbing, and I apologize for the graphic nature, however "pillar of salt" comes to mind on that one . . .  However we've seen that around in other places, that animals will be frozen like that, dead from smoke inhalation and lack of oxygen.  Sometimes people trying to get out of a house fire will die frozen in place reaching up to the door handle.  So it's a normal thing to see with fires.  

Stone houses catch on fire too, and tend to burn from the inside house like an oven.  Fire does weird things, and that is what people need to understand here, that fire itself is weird.  Magic space beams isn't where the weird is, the weird is in fire itself.

​
​The image on the above far right of the big truck on fire, that one too, doesn't add up and is mysterious.  But . . . . .  it didn't start any fires, if anything that truck fire isn't responsible for burning up people's homes.  That may be an un-related photo.  I've seen a big truck like that burning on the side of the road locally.  There was a reason it caught on fire, but it was a perfectly explainable known and understood reason.

Here's an example of what energy weapons did in Iraq:
​

And, here is a link about what a Fire Captain in Northern Cali had said about fires being suspicious when it looks like high powered particle beam weapons burned through car hoods and engine blocks and whatnot ...  I have yet to see PROOF of cars having holes punched through the hood and engine block in photos involving the California fires, however, other than deliberate and intentional laser weapons test fires, ...  but here's some foreshadowing: just keep reading.

https://www.shiftfrequency.com/dew-used-northern-california-fires/



And here also is an article called "Camp Fire: The Terrifying Science Behind California's Massive Camp Fire" ...   with SCIENCE being the key word, here:

​https://www.wired.com/story/the-terrifying-science-behind-californias-massive-camp-fire/?fbclid=IwAR1WagcVlpUAo-JS3WZCmlYVWutWVbEygHFtkg40QLzGlyQqMUbyfsnF9YI


​
​People are saying "oh, that's not how a normal fire behaves, it MUST be DEW" ...  but in actuality, a lot of this *IS* how a normal fire behaves.  When people can understand the normal causes, THEN we can go looking at alternative options, but otherwise when it's people's first reaction to say, "oh something bad happened, they must be trying to kill us!"  It can get pretty close to psychosis -- the issue of not being able to accurately determine and to distinguish one's reality.  That's when people go to jail and tell the news that the voices in their head told them to put the cat in the toaster.  

So this is an examination so far of what is normal, and what may not be normal, for educational purposes at this point.


​

This isn't one of the better bridge burning videos I've seen.  I've seen a good one where the asphalt had collapsed completely and was actually on fire, and the steel I-beams were actually warped and drooping 3 or 4 feet below their level.  In this video above, it's only smoldering.  Yet, the question arises, WTF?

This article shows that bridge actually that I refer to:  https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/video/3976374-mulholland-highway-bridge-collapses-from-heat-of-woolsey-fire/

That bridge isn't shown as being on fire still; that was a private video unfortunately.  Now that it has hit the bridge level of fire damage, and as showing in the link above causing severe sagging of the steel I-beams, I have to raise an eyebrow.  I've seen some doozy oil fires fed by compressed air get a steel barrel red hot, but I can't imagine what it would have taken to burn a bridge down under normal circumstances.  That would have taken a lot of fuel, a lot of forced air, and those I-beams would have had to have gotten red hot, and stayed that way for a while.

It's actually just the one bridge.  It apparently burned for a while and smoldered, and the asphalt burned too, for quite a while, possibly for days.  On both sides of the bridge it looked like the trees were not burned; there are houses at one end of the road perfectly intact.  The only burning appeared to be in the channel under the bridge that it spanned across.

Regarding the bridge:  I have seen railroad tracks warped and twisty after a forest fire went through the area . . .  those areas however were extensively burned.  This bridge however . . .  usually fires that come across bridges only scorch the bridge, not melt it almost in two as the link shows (same bridge)....   although, I don't see any melted I beams, I see warped. Structural steel loses 70% of its strength by 900F. Asphalt is basically burning tar, well over 900F.  So I CAN see an intense fire ravaging under the bridge fed by wind conditions through the gap that the bridge spans, and heating up the asphalt like a tar roof will do....



​
Mankind has grown so "sophisticated" that the most basic of all destructive elementals -- fire -- has overwhelmed them in California, due to a lot of things, including the aluminum-dusted forests.  The San Francisco Bay bridge was on fire recently, some of the wrapping under the bridge that keeps the pigeons out was burning and on fire.  Water boats had to put the fire out from underneath.  I don't think DEWs started that fire . . .  more than likely the burning ash from a blunt tossed out the window . . .

That's a real problem, because if DEWs aren't the cause of the majority of the fires, nor the fuel and conditions that cause the fires to burn rapidly, and the fire fighters think that DEWs ARE the cause . . .  then what does that tell you about the intelligence level to accurately solve problems of a simple nature that isn't using complex math, but may be hard to understand the physics of -- simple fire?  Should fire be considered in metaphysics instead of physics?  Where does society say is the most truthful, what we can understand and do and meet and achieve, or only what can be calculated with no solid ground in action?

I had friends deployed to Kuwait in the summertime, and it was so hot there that trees and foliage were spontaneously catching on fire.  DEWs did not cause those fires. 

​It looks like people are going to have to RE-LEARN the old ways, along side with learning for the first time, the new ways.  The photo way above regarding the 9/11 "car"nage of the vehicles and the dustification of the building, that actually has a really good leg to stand on that directed energy weapons were the primary destructive energy involved.  But these California fires, it's the fire itself that is the primary destructive energy involved.  So there is a difference that people should learn to discern.

There are some anomalies, but for the most part, just a single static spark alone can ignite California on fire. I think these fires are Earth's Purification Fires of the Hopi prophecy.  

It's kicking up radioactivity, too, from old abandoned test fields and whatnot that kids get cancer from, living around those areas. Which begs the question .. parents, ever think moving AWAY from old radioactive weapon test beds is probably the best for your children?

This is a lesson in the Old Ways, of how to handle the most basic of all destructive elementals -- fire. Just gotta learn the new ways too, at the same time as re-learning the old ways.

​So when the breath of the dragon blows (the Santa Ana and El Diablo "fire" winds), which cause the California fires every damn year, just be advised that your forests are aluminum-dusted, California, and everything is very prone to burning hot, and fast.

The land is so dry, when the Santa Ana winds kick up, static electric sparks can set the land on fire.  Back in the dust bowl of Oklahoma, the winds blew the dust and huge static sparks would jump from trash can lids and metal fence posts . . .

​
​
​
Some of the causes of those fires are spiritual reasons due to how people use their consciousness to create energy into manifestation.  Fire is what people have chosen.  You create your own reality!

The great equalizer. The one thing people need to realize about these California fires is: You Create Your Reality.

You gonna get hit by a DEW, or the breath of the dragon of the Santa Ana fire winds? Or are the fire paths going to go around you and leave you unscathed?

You create your own reality. What reality do you tune yourself toward, one of fear, mistrust, chaos, blame, and victim? Or one of empowered creation, Faith, knowing, belief, trust, and safety?

Many people's chosen energy of how they manifest their (consciousness) existence is fire.


People think DEWs are able to put fires out or able to stop fire from going where "they" don't want fire to go, totally not comprehending the "spiritual" nature of fire to act as a mysterious "being" in its own right, AND to respond to consciousness as an elemental energy.

The smartmeter argument that smartmeters catch on fire is a good argument. Aluminum-dusted forests burning hotter and faster is a good argument. In both those instances, Humanity is not just at fault, but refuses to make changes to correct the problem.

But if you blame it on DEWs, then no one has to take accountability in their hands to fix the problems. A perfect economic psy-op.  Plus, there's fear now; THAT is how you control a population -- through fear.




I do want to share this video below however.  There is a case for DEW weapons starting the fires in California now being compiled by Californians to be shown to city officials and fire departments.  The only difference is that the "invisible" beam that shows up in the IR band of a camera is also being spotted by people apparently, via the naked eye . . .   That could only happen if there's enough colloids and particles in the air to fluoresce with the light of the beam...   I'm sure people have been to a laser light concert where fog or mist will light up the beams. . . 

But the beams SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BE SEEN IN CLEAR SKY CONDITIONS, and there inlies the problem of understanding the true causes of these fires.  Electrical weapons can be seen during broad daylight, as long as one's frequency is high to see.

​In this video below, there is light produced from the laser beam caught on camera, and a bright blue flash that lights things up, probably able to be seen with the naked eye (beam invisible; flash visible to naked eye).

It will be shown that during the Santa Rosa fires, and in other places, eye witness accounts of what could be DEWs were reported WIDELY and by MANY.

Who are the victims, and who are the observers?


​
​I think people are wrong about the reasons why, and blaming the UN or Agenda-21 which is a SIMPLE association to make, and easy to see through, dumbed down for the public.  I think the real reasons are much more clandestine.   Plus when Californians are in an uproar that prisoners are volunteering as fire fighters (and making more money than normal volunteer fire fighters), and are complaining about that, then it sure seems that Californians are easy targets for confusion and imbalanced grounded prioritized thinking.

There are laws in California that have banned the practice of clearing out the underbrush in the forests like the Boy Scouts used to volunteer to do back in the "good ole' days."  

Because people misunderstand the ways that fire really works, it has made it difficult to take the "DEW memes" seriously.  People could be paid to lie just like all those fake free energy videos that has made it difficult to spot the real ones.  As long as people remain ignorant and imbalanced, this is going to be an on-going problem until people learn to discern.

I don't put it past Californians to drive over a road that is engulfed in a forest fire blaze, either which leave wreckage of cars burned up on the road, and later people looking at the aftermath scene scratching their head going WTF?

People died in those fires, too.  The fire can be so hot that it bursts the windows in and catches everything on fire, and the trees do not have to be gone, because we see that in NORMAL fires.

So there are serious credibility issues going on too, and questions over the sensibility of your average Californian.  I hate to say it but . . .   that's a factor....  and as noted above:  there are families living around a known old radioactive test site, and their kids all have cancer, and they hold up signs, but they are not moving away from the source of radioactivity . . .

A lot of these memes of lasers from the sky are out of movies such as "War of the Worlds."  Videos of what must be DEW are from movies such as "American Apocalypse."  I'm not saying that directed energy weapons of various light or radio or scalar frequencies don't exist, ...  and actually there are some credible camera video footage of directed energy weapons now via the video above.

I do have to commend the folks who took the time to video the fire (the video above).

​The video above can be added to the amount of evidence that goes into the pile . . .  and may very well serve to prove that DEWs were indeed involved in the California fires.

Ok..   I was just sent video of the scene where the cars were on the road all burned up and trees stood on both sides of the road, some partially burned, and it shows skeletal Human remains inside those burned cars on this little 2 lane road through the forest.  I dunno how many cars, maybe 20 - 40 in this one little stretch of road.  Some of those you can see from the above videos...   

The guy narrating that video that I'm probably not going to show, also says that he almost got burned alive in his car, too . . .   So showing that graphic video to warrant a case examination is not worth it unless more conclusive information is also provided, so I will elect not to share that video.  From the commenter on the unwatchable video however, it looks like people were caught in a forest fire....

​In comparison, the 2012 fires that roared through a part of Oklahoma created large massive and loud moving fire walls that were very hot and very tall, but the trees burned in the fire, many of them still stand today but they are dead and look twisted up...


. . .



Here is another article saying that it was an attack, and there are videos, it's from an eye-witness point of view, and more people are coming forward talking about seeing "blue lasers" in the sky before Hurricane Harvey . . . 

This article says that the tops of telephone poles were on fire on her way out to evacuate, but there was no other fire around to catch them on fire.  It also tells of houses selectively on fire, but no fires leading up to those houses, and about fire fighting equipment sabotaged, as per complaints from the fire fighters.  There are events leading up to this, including PG&E calling residents and warning them of strong fire possibility on Thursday (the day of the fire).  Helicopters were buzzing around the town weeks before, and dropping chemicals.

There are also compare/contrasts with other fires where no cars were burned at all.

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2857596?fbclid=IwAR0g4AdaIZVKz228smrEjg2zFjzHHjNdRuSp2YDKtrukB7eHuH4JtYQ3hB8



. . .

​
​

Reality Assessment: 
​

I thought I could write this article to put people's paranoid fears at rest but ... it ended up being a bit of a nightmare from everything that is going on ...  of which this is currently going on in Earth reality.  So the question must be asked, are we truly ready for warp drive spaceports at this point?  I think when we start to see more ET disclosure and evidence that the secret space programs are willing to work toward helping Earth reality, even economically to provide free housing, education, healthcare, and electricity . . .  as well as helping out in natural disasters or otherwise un-natural disasters, then I think we're ready to take things to the next step in Earth evolution.

But in the meantime, there's going to be destruction happening, especially when the technology that surfaces can be weaponized and turned against the public.  That may very well be a planned deterrent to for disclosure if everything disclosed is now seen to be a weapon against the people of Earth.  That is something to think about before proceeding on at this point.


​I think it's interesting that new technology being disclosed as also being seen to be weaponized and used against the public. Also economic warfare too, with free energy .. can be used as a weapon. Antigravity no doubt can be used as a weapon too since lasers can be fired from a ship without the craft being damaged or disturbed.

I think it's wise to hold off on all further development at this point. Things have to change on Earth, and tyranny has to be eliminated or checked to the point where it's not able to manifest, before furthering the progress.

We still have yet to see the ground-based Tesla weapons used against the public, like from that huge Tesla tower in Texas. It's coming though.

7G wireless is out too in Canada, and they hardwired their electrical grid to protect them from EMP attacks (also that can be large Solar flares). We don't have that in America, yet...  and the health threats from 5G alone is substantial.

I think technology is growing way too fast at this point for people to be able to adapt, and there are safety issues and outright dangers involved.

There are good things happening too at the same time with things like ET disclosure ... but there's a firm division between what happens on Earth and things that are space-related yet, and that bridge has to be built before things can really progress toward actually reaching for the stars. I think the stars need to reach for us a little bit, too.



​
It's funny though, that people got phone calls and letters in the mail in Paradise California with advanced warning that "there may be a strong possibility for fire on Thursday," and repeated phone calls at least 3 days before the fires on Thursday, the day the fire broke out.  If people did not create their own realities, then why would they have received a warning, an advanced notice?  That is a thing of Love, to say the least, at least in some form of some kind of honor to life, just not to property.  This is something to really think about.  Some of these mechanics are written on the Ascension and Metaphysics blogs, and a lot of information is revealed in the recommended reading list on the home page.  

People had the opportunity to leave.  To receive a notice about the disaster is most definitely people creating their own realities, somehow manifesting their conscious intention to stay safe.  Those who know will know.  "If you survive the frequencies, you will evolve" -- Barbara Marciniak.



​
I would like to conclude this article at this time . . .   

This is very sad and tragic.

​




​


​BREAKING NEWS!  David Wilcock, declassified exclulsive

​

Have Earth weather systems completely collapsed, or are they on the verge?  

​This is a huge event for the planetary news page.  

I don't think the Earth weather systems have completely collapsed, however it has changed, both due to Humanity's presence, but also due to cosmic energies flooding Earth currently, raising up Earth's frequency and all frequency of life on Earth, which affects great change unto life, affecting the realities of many diverse lifeforms.  An example is that the monkeys all over the planet now are starting to wash their food.  Species change in their DNA patterning in correlation with consciousness focus, which is very well established.  But this is big news, and I admit, I've seen the results of Tesla energy systems in how they affect our weather patterns first hand with my own work.



What do I mean by "cosmic energies pumping up Earth frequency" which causes more intense storm systems?  ....   I write about a flat earth reality and a globe earth reality. Those are two different diverging reality systems.  They are two different models of Earth reality, of the reality in which Earth exists.  Just as we have a star system and a planetary system, each system represents the reality of all the action within that system, and we have models to explain how the reality of how those systems work.   What do I mean by "reality systems?"  Well, here's a nutshell description:

Love-based reality is opposite to fear-based reality, each with their own outcome. Light reality and dark reality are different systems with different causality. Parallel realities can co-exist .. see the Mandela effect. And then you have timelines which diverge and converge and can exist in parallel. Quantum mechanics say the sum of the probable pasts influences the current present. You have probable realities and probable timelines too. Hence reality systems. 

Now think about adding energy to that and giving Earth more energy than it's electrical capacitance of it's storms and lightning that charges Earth .. and then think about how consciousness affects all that. Schumann resonance is way up .. that affects things.

Everyone creates their own reality. How many people live in different realities operating under different philosophies of how their realities work for them?  This next brings up co-creation tho. We each add to the whole of all that CAN exist. We certainly didn't need Fukashima, but then I'm sure there are some positive aspects of life that are lovely and happy.

The mechanics of how we create is very extensive.  Look at what we are creating these days.  Look at how that affects reality.  Look at the reality we create.  Look at how we all have to live with the consequences.  I didn't create the Gulf spill.  I didn't create Fukashima, but I live in the reality in where it happened.  Now the concept starts to break down a little.  This is why one's "own" reality is a distinction, as technically it can't be said one creates reality, in general.  But to say that one does not create one's OWN reality is to deny all accountability for the consequences that one experiences, and that only one individual experiences in his/her own life.

Some people can just have bad luck all the time. But it is nonetheless pertaining only to that one individual. How can the individual change one's luck? Well .. that individual creates that luck.

I didn't want to lecture on reality creation mechanics here in this article though.  It can be seen however, on this page in the articles below, that a flat earth reality and a globe reality both are diverging realities.  Divergence is another thing entirely.....

If you have diverging cultures, how do they interact with each other, and to what extent does creative potential exist? Well, I'd say that a culture with a grasp on true reality has a far greater creative potential, and the other is very, very limited in what they can create, what tools they can make, what technologies they can bring forth, and what mental and spiritual development they can achieve.



Moving on ...



These are some of the most important videos to watch, if not a critical update that absolutely has to be watched. This is not just about conspiracy, there's a LOT of extra science involved with this presentation, which involves space based energy generators (SSP, Space Solar Power systems), lots of patents, and lots of coverage of what's going on ...

The SSP (space solar power) systems work with land-based units (literally dotting the map of the U.S. on a GRAND scale, which floating platforms also can be taken out into the oceans as these videos show) .. which was something that I went through with my Tesla tower and a NASA satellite, in conjunction with spray planes flying in formation like the blue angels right overhead my tower .. and in conjunction with the local Army base ... which I won't get into there... Land based and space-based systems have to work together to generate the scalar waves that drive storms (and vortex scalar waves to intensify storms), from what I discovered.

I've even heard the skies cooking overhead before as the HAARP arrays steered a decent-sized storm system right over my house.

​
In fact, it is admitted that weather modification technology does exist.  So that is not a "conspiracy theory."
It can however, be an example of reality creation.  
​

​The reality of Earth weather systems can be created, or rather co-created with nature, by the use of technology, but not limited to the use of consciousness also, working with elemental energies.  A friend of mine once stood in front of a tornado in astral form to protect his house, and the tornado split in two, went around his house, and rejoined and continued.  Earth elemental energies responds to Human consciousness; they are in service to Human consciousness.

It could be said that elemental energies are also an aspect of living consciousness, otherwise it could not interact with living Human consciousness.  So, elemental forms of life do have a consciousness of their own.


This article discusses the technological aspects of the reality of weather creation, though.  Highlights include the use of NEXRAD, water evaporator systems and weather modification technology with video footage verifying these technologies in use today. I have even seen some of this with my own eyes, and have had involvements with the space based power generator experiments (being used as a Guinea pig) when NASA satellites were beaming energy to my Tesla tower. I'm very familiar with electrostatic interference wave patterns in the air that do create clouds, because of my involvement with Tesla and warp drive technology development.

The weather patterns are clearly tracked, and clearly able to be seen as to what exactly is going on. And the use of these technologies is UNDENIABLE.

There are also claims that our Earth weather system has totally collapsed, and the weather we experience today is completely artificially created. There is evidence of these weather modification technologies literally dotting the whole U.S. from coast to coast, and in the U.K.

I've posted a few videos, and in the bottom link, it shows that these weather modification technologies have the NASA logo on the side of these evaporator and land-based cloud generating systems, even in the U.K.

​This is going on all over the world! The strange sounds we are hearing around the world too, are these systems using Tesla-based frequency technology to manipulate weather and even shift the tectonic plates to cause earthquakes (low frequency). In America its referred to as HAARP. (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) These are sounds heard all over as the frequencies hit and reflects off the ionosphere.

As a note, HAARP used to stand for High Altitude Auroral Research Program .. but the use of low and high frequencies are specific for their intended purposes.


. . .


New Information!   I've recently been discussing some things, and found out that by dumping a lot of water vapor into the atmosphere, it is actually killing a hurricane.  Otherwise, vortex scalar waves could pump up a hurricane.  So it is entirely possible that by dumping a lot of water vapor into the atmosphere, the hurricane over Houston was trying to be diverted or weakened, which could explain why it hovered in one place for days, trying to push the hurricane back from land.  It's hard to say, but, from what I've recently been told, I really don't think it was done on purpose, and that Humanity is actually making efforts to do for the highest good against the "threats" that we, the public just don't understand as a rule.  

I would say be cautious about claiming that all weather modification and climate control technologies is for nefarious purposes, because it's entirely possible that it's quite the opposite.  But, all I'm really trying to say here is that these technologies exist, but our understanding of it is still limited, but we will learn more about all this in time.

The way things are looking at this point, is that it was an accident that hurricane Harvey got so strong.  Otherwise I honestly believe weather control technologies are being used and understood for purposes of good intentions, rather than the alternative.  For example cloud seeding could take place to pull the water out of a storm system, rather than adding to it.

It's low pressure that does the most to maintain a hurricane storm system, not so much by adding water vapor which could kill it.

"Depending on the location of the vapor and how much is present. Hurricanes are initially formed by large amounts of water vapor rising through the air. But they can also be stopped once formed by the weight of water in the air that may or may not act as a drag against spin. That's how I've heard it explained anyways."

If you think about a bathtub drain making the water vortex, if you stick your finger in the middle, it disrupts it.  I would have to say adding water weight in the inside near the eye would disrupt the Hurricane, adding more weight to the energy center.  We saw what adding water vapor around the outside of the Hurricane does with Harvey (see the videos below).  

If adding water vapor to the outside of a hurricane, it could also add water weight to the spinning system, unless it pulls that mass closer to the interior to spin it up with more of an unstoppable force .....  It's honestly hard to say at this point without further analysis.  ...  It does seem highly likely at this point that by adding MORE water vapor to a storm system, it will indeed intensify that storm, and data goes back to the 1950's which shows just that.  If that is the case, we may have a real problem.  Consciousness however does play a role in this, as mentioned above.  So ..  the benefit of people raising their levels of consciousness frequency, IE more frequently vibrating consciousness in harmony with the energetics of living energy systems would make so much of a difference, on a phenomenal scale, that can it really be said that we would be acting irresponsibly by not giving this some consideration?


. . .
​
​
So many "conspiracy theorists" though are always paranoid and thinking they're out to get us.  Sure some of that happens, but the majority of secret operations that the public does not see, involving the military is not what people would think.  Working with other indigenous intelligent species, that may seem as ET or otherwise, is often done for the common goals of planetary defense against threats that affect the entire planet (above and below the surface, and in space), so where we do have to work together, because in secret, we are intelligent enough to know Honor.

You do have to discern though, but I'll tell you what, fear-based reality scenarios are not the truth, and are just illusion, seen time and time again as such.  

It is very plausible that these massive weather systems are due to great tidal waves of cosmic energy coming to Earth.  We HAVE been preparing for this, but we are a young race, a young specie (in spite of our incredibly ancient origins and history) and yet we still have much to learn, in this era.


​
WATCH THE VIDEOS!

​

In this video below, there are better videos, but compiled on facebook instead, not youtube...   But in the second week in January of 2012, all around the world in Conklin, Alberta Canada ...  Budapest, Hungary ...  Acosta, Costa Rica ...  Montreal, Canada ...  Saskatoon, Saskatchewan ...  Poland ...   Edmunton, Alberta Canada ...  and Kiev, Russia ...  all in the same week heard these sounds.  

​

"So there is talk of weather wars between nations, using this frequency technology to manipulate weather and even shift the tectonic plates to cause earthquakes. In America its referred to as HAARP. (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) These are sounds heard all over as the frequencies hit and reflects off the ionosphere."

Here is another instance of the electromagnetic vibrating of the Earth ionosphere making this sound in the upper atmosphere which reflects down, and the immense energy causes the clouds to organize in patterns like salt crystals on a sound plate, or the cloud cone forming on an aircraft breaking the sound barrier.  This can also have origins in space from large energy generators beaming down.

Another alternative explanation is energy being beamed from a long distance to Earth, similar to how Tesla had experimented with portal technologies and energy teleportation, accidentally teleporting megawatts of energy to Siberia causing a large explosive energy release back in his experimental days. 

This "sound beam" could very easily be a result of energy, breaking the sound barrier over Jerusalem, but since it is localized to a plane above the Earth's surface, it would suggest it's origin to be in the center of mass of the ring.
​

.

​

~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~

In this image below, we see vaporator systems creating water vapor, which in turn create cloud systems for rain in Oklahoma.

Note the electrostatic interference wave patterns. Also the clouds are being generated by water evaporator systems, and you can see the blooms coming from land up into the air, to cause rain throughout Oklahoma. 
I have witnessed the formation of cloud structures, and I have CREATED them with the use of my Tesla tower, by the way, back in 2011 - 2012. So I'm very familiar with some of this technology.

Again, note the electrostatic wave patterns emanating from NEXRAD land-based systems, OR from interference waves generated BETWEEN land-based, and space-based systems (just like the Tesla tower and NASA satellite fun I went through I've reported so much about before).

​http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-08-28-weather-wars-theorists-claim-hurricane-harvey-was-engineered-steered-toward-houston-as-a-weather-terrorism-weapon.html


https://www.infowars.com/houston-woman-warned-media-officials-were-downplaying-harvey-in-pre-hurricane-fb-post/



​Also, we will be watching Hurricane Irma.  An X-class solar flare release has been spotted, which could strengthen the hurricane.  Responsible weather forecasting must take in all these things into affect, so that if geo-engineering is going to be a reality, it can be done so with wisdom for the highest good of all life on Earth.  Things are changing.  Knowledge overcomes ignorance.  

​

Here's the latest space weather report from the "New Valley of the Sun.  Eyes open.  No fear."
​

​

                                                                                                   UPDATED (9/03/2017)
​​
Let's first go over some helpful geometry:


According to the Flat Earth Society, the "Flatte Earth math" is generally accepted of a curve calculation table and circular geometry, coming off the tangent of the circle.

Round Earth geometry comes from the center, and the radius of the circle. The two maths are fundamentally / philosophically different in their approaches toward ... inherent truth.

The distance of two points, how much drop over the horizon should a distant object have?


​
​
Flat Earth Society (off by a factor of around 3.5)                  Circular Segment Geometry

​As you can see the math is very different in the two examples above.  
​

Finally the circular segment geometry precisely calculates line of sight distances. So the instances discussed on the flat earth relative frames article at the bottom of this page has finally been resolved so that objects no longer are calculated to be below the horizon. Those were flat Earth lies unfortunately using the wrong math.  This actually comes up in the recently added video at the bottom of this article.

​
​. . .


Secondly, I'd like to point out the map. 

​
Light itself is the best "measuring stick" once again, as we shall examine the sunlight in Antarctica during its seasons; and also shall examine time.

Right away, I want to point out that a gravitational model of a round Earth will allow for zero gravity in the center of Earth, as the mass of Earth around the center pulls upon the center, and pulls upon the surface. So the center of Earth will have zero gravity, unless it has negative gravity being a negative electromagnetic ground.  Gravity cannot be ruled out as non-existent in a Flatte Earth narrative, due to the response from the post below, "Logic is Truth."

​

In the link below, there is a quote:

​http://www.wildland.com/destinations/antarctica/antarctica/seasonsclimate.aspx

January-February:  SummerPeak season, with daytime temperatures on the Peninsula reaching upwards of 50°F  while the continent receives nearly 24 hours of daylight.
​

Antarctica has two months of sunlight nearly 24 hours a day. But, the flat Earth model shows a flat map with Antarctica at the edge, and the sun moving around the map, giving sunrise / sunsets per 24 hours to Antarctica.

This map is accurate according to the Flat Earth Society, which is the leading accepted Flatte Earth narrative.

​The sun rotates around the disk per 24 hours.  This is an incorrect map, because it is centered around the northern hemisphere at the North Pole.  

In the map, the south pole is represented by the outer circumference.  When the sun travels south seasonally, the sunlight does not overlap the pole, like it does when centered around the north pole.  The north pole summer months receive nearly 24 hours per day of sunshine, and the sun appears to travel in a circle around the horizon, so the sunlight overlaps the Arctic circle for full-time sunlight.

The south perimeter ring, the sunshine appears to rise and set every day, and the flat Earth map does not allow for 24 hours of sunshine per day in Antarctica, during the Antarctic summer months.

This map then, does not fit the reality of Antarctica seen at the McMurdo Station in the months of January and February.  The only way to show an accurate map of the reality we Humans experience on Earth is to have the southern hemisphere map centered around the south pole, to have two flat Earth maps that fits the reality of each hemisphere.  But to do that would blow the whole model.


​

​Also, the time zones don't work right.  Out at the edge of a flat map, the distance is longer than it should be because the time per hour of longitudinal rotation is warped, in that it is lengthened beyond what is measured by Australians living in the southern hemisphere.

This map shows the time zones of Earth, in that the outer edge where Australians, and South Africans and South Americans all live, is in a time warp, where the time it takes them to travel a distance that would normally take a couple of hours East to West in Canada would take many more hours in New Zealand, and over a much longer distance.  

You can see the evidence of "The Game" in the caption at the top (see "The Game" article below).



. . .

​


Thirdly, I'd like to discuss a little about Antarctica.


Where do I even begin?  This is the Planetary News article of the century!

I'm keeping somewhat quiet about it because it's big news everywhere else!   We've discovered the ancient remains of a technologically advanced very ancient race of Humans and ET, working side-by-side, flash frozen a long time ago.

Many people have already heard about it, ​as it is sweeping across world headlines.
​
​

​See, Antarctica is a continent, and Earth has a south pole, not a southern perimeter.



More information to come, perhaps ...   Stay tuned for future updates of this article.







So what's special about Antarctica?

Why do they want people to think the Earth is flat, as a result?


Who are "they" and is this really the case?  Certainly the Flat Earth paradigm is an experiment in social psychology to determine the readiness of the public to discern the truth and to act responsibly with information in a pre-Disclosure era.  So as long as people run wild with a Flat Earth narrative, people are proving that not everyone is ready for Disclosure.  That's the point I'm trying to make.  It's entirely possible that people will have to be in agreement with each other not to tell others what we know, if others prove to not be ready for it.  In the case of information such as on this website, those who are not prepared to see will merely dismiss these possibilities, and not even be interested in reading anyway.

It may very well seem that we are living side-by-side with another specie of Human, in fact, forced to respect their own evolutionary path as we continue on our own .......  except for the tyrannical and ignorant politicians and global banksters, of which the only way to truly honor ignorance as an evil tyrannical force is to uproot it from the planet.  As long as the people are divided however, it is possible there can coexist two different species of Humans (discernible by capacity of intelligence and emotional integrity), unifiable by unconditional Love.  This is why Disclosure is a difficult delivery, currently.

It must be said though, that it only SEEMS like we are living as two species side-by-side, but we are of One Kind.  This must be taken into consideration, so as there does not exist a division between our brothers and sisters.  Again, this falls back upon Ascension mechanics, about the ways to influence the reality around one to be more harmonious with all the life that is interconnected together.

I'll tell ya right now though, a flat earth reality will NOT ascend. (an obvious example of this is that flat Earthers don't believe in outer space and think of Earth reality as "in a box" contained in a dome.)  Flat earth is a diverging reality from a reality of Ascension.


​
​​For those with eyes to see:
​

The latest news about Antarctica is that under the ice, when Antarctica was once warm and green long ago, perhaps as old as a million years ago, there was an ancient and very technologically ultra-advanced Human and ET civilization which thrived, but it suddenly flash froze.  

So under the ice, there's a lot of super advanced technology and ships and whatnot just laying around.  Well not anymore, because it's been picked over and secreted away.  Not many understand the technology it may seem . . .   

In fact, the Piri Reis map, and the map making of the 16th century (mid 1500's), put Antarctica with longitude at the south pole, but showing the continent without any ice, right around 13,000 B.C.

That's roughly the same time the mammoths in Siberia, Russia were flash-frozen.

​

Antarctica is written into many people's probable timelines and probable selves.  



We're also finding out that a lot of very advanced technology and bodies have been removed from the sites in Antarctica, and less-advanced alien technology is being pulled out of the warehouses and planted at these locations.  World leaders and authorized people are then brought in to see the manufactured scenario in a partial disclosure agenda that can manipulate another world paradigm, once again by hiding the truth.  

The layers of compartmentalization is okay so as long as each step along the way is accessible, but guarded for the right reasons.  But when compartmentalization is used to hide layers of truth without a means to access the truth, that is when it becomes impossible for people to wisely evolve in ways of more advanced ethics and code of honor. That's when technology becomes dangerous for all of Humanity due to the hoarding of technology without understanding it. The fact that people are getting angry over this means that something of a dishonorable nature is going on in this situation.  

The biggest fear is that disclosure represents a security risk.  However, disclosure also represents much more.  The risks of secrecy is for purposes to control, and to be protected against those who would want to have control.  But many are already at a level of reality where the control paradigm applies differently to a more logical reality, where the old control paradigm does not apply to any logical layer of reality.
   

​
stay tuned . . .


​

In related news, it has been reported by Dr. Michael Salla that Saddam Hussein had uncovered a stargate, and all the fighting in the Mid East was concerning this.  Here is a follow up on it, which relates also to Antarctica, and perhaps should be on the exo-archaeoastronomy page, but this falls into the planetary news category much more-so.  


Saddam also had constructed a very unusual communication tower which looked similar to a space needle and was one of the first targets destroyed in operation desert storm years ago.

 It's unclear if it was either a stargate or a portal .. A stargate goes to many worlds. A portal goes to one destination. It's a "planetary portal" they found, also according to Barbara Marciniak's writings. A large planetary portal. ... I have some contacts in the loop a little as to what has been found in Antarctica. They also found submarines which use magnetohydrodynamic propulsion .. which I presume were the Nazi submarines in Antarctica. 

From what they discovered in Antarctica, it also gives them access to a lot of ancient sites all around the world. But as I understand it, the scientists involved do not fully understand the stone and crystalline power sources that are also in places like South America. Some of those places use spheres inserted into receptacles to power up ancient machines.

Some spheres are scattered throughout the Earth, on some Islands like Galapagos or Gallapilos (sp?) island and in Costa Rica.

Gateway of the Sun in Peru is another such machine.

Some of the technology is presumed to open up an ancient Hall of Records that may have been found in South America. There are many untouched locations in that area which the natives still keep their secrets. Also one of the largest shipyards for the secret space programs is there. What they found under Antarctica also includes kilometer long cylinder spacecraft very very ancient, which are basically interstellar capable.

This technology was known to Tesla however.  Tesla and Cal Richardson had used special energy technology (negative energy) that has off-world ET roots and origins to power up the world fair (I forget the year) using free energy - the abundant energy of the universe.

In fact the starships found in Antarctica (also corresponding to what was crashed on the moon, reported in esoteric circles) use an impeller drive system capable of warp drive faster-than-light travel, and that is being reported also by a few others in the loop ..  with contacts in the know.

I'm not at liberty to reveal my sources.











Additional:


Here is an addition of a controversial experiment:

The experiment takes place on water or at a large lake.  At one end of a line of site distance, a transom telescope is placed; at the other end is a bridge with a measuring stick up to an elevation of 13 feet from the surface of the water up.  The transom is mounted at 13 feet from the surface of the water up and has a level line of site to the bridge at the other end.  A boat goes out to the middle, or a buoy with a measuring stick from surface of water up.  That height of the boat's measuring stick will be sticking up higher in the middle, due to the Earth's curve.

The same experiment can be performed using a little island in the middle instead of a boat.  
​


​



And Finally:


​To add to the collection of my "debunk the flat Earth and try to explain stuff" hobby, I want to share this beautifully done video below ..  which actually has nothing to do with Antarctica itself, but ...  since this article is probably my best debunking article, I want to kick it off with a bang.

Yeah, I admit, I love the gravity-lens concept a bit too much, although it may account for about 33% of distortion, whereas atmospheric lensing accounts for the other 66% of distortion, still it's a beautiful thing to actually consider so as long as you don't say there's no such thing as gravity.  Some flatte Earthers do indeed account for gravity, even though they say gravity is just a theory, and they present their own version of an electromagnetic theory of gravity, whereas they are nonetheless still spouting a theory of something that is proven to exist as a fact, and the fact is:  gravity really does exist, even though you may explain how it works in multiple ways, it nonetheless exists.

Let's face it.  There's no way a flat Earther will ever understand any of this, otherwise they wouldn't be a flatte Earther to begin with.  It does NOT mean that YOU have to be AFRAID that our specie is degenerating into a new dark age of ignorance, not when we have warp drive on the table.  PUT IT INTO PERSPECTIVE. 

I have other things going on at this website other than just hyperdrive and warp drive research, such as metaphysics (to help explain thought-piloting and creation, which is part of creating a reality of warp drive), which is important, and was the foundation for this study to begin with.  This planetary news page was never intended to tackle flat Earth delusion, nor to address all the intentional lies that Flat Earthers purport, but to help people to see things in a different perspective, and to assist in discerning the nature of reality we live in (going back to metaphysics).  However, I admit I got carried away a little bit.  

The gravity lens explanation was to show that even though you may see a flat horizon (which does have a tiny bit of curvature, depending on your height), it is not evidence enough to claim that the Earth is flat, due to gravity and atmospheric lensing, and other phenomena.  

It also goes without saying that you can't feel the Earth spinning, just the same way that if you're in a fast-moving passenger jet or bus, you can be traveling at 400 miles per hour (in an airplane) and get up and walk up and down the isles, and not feel the reality of your speed (see: laws of inertia).  Due to gravity of Earth, even though Earth spins and there is a bit of circular acceleration going on, the gravity force counteracts the relatively slow scalar force of centrifugal motion.  Let's face it, if a tennis ball were wet, and it were to spin at the same scalar rate of Earth, it would make one full rotation in a 24 hour time period.  You would hardly even detect it was moving at all.  Relatively speaking, that is how SLOW our Earth actually spins, and the tiny bit of centrifugal force is not nearly enough to counteract the force of gravity, which if you read down a ways, one can NOT claim gravity does not exist.

Since gravity attracts to the center of mass, then the force of down is always to the very center of Earth, anywhere on the surface you are.  Let's have a little common sense please, and put the notion of -- pouring water on a basketball is always going to spill out on the floor -- to bed.  

The purpose of the multi-world realm concept of possible lands or worlds or realms beyond the south pole actually has helped a multitude of Flatte Earthers to realize that we are not isolated and trapped on Earth, living in a box, where there is no life or any reality outside of Earth, but that we can go to other worlds, maybe on a rainbow bridge from the land of the frozen south ...  But as I've stated in "The Game" article below, there's no reason I need to address Flat Earthers at all, other than I'm just very compassionate and don't want the ignorant to be the hardest hit when Disclosure goes more mainstream.

One last thing, the Apollo mission to the moon route has been explained by taking a northern route over the poles to avoid the radiation density of the Van Allen belts.  If you've ever looked at the belts, they are a donut shape around Earth, with the lowest concentration over the poles (the holes of the donut of the Van Allen belts).  Look it up, and ...

​Enjoy the video.



​

​

The moon is a big part of our planetary reality.

It gives us another point of reference.  Now we have the Earth and the moon which is part of the Earth system, and we have space that is between two points of reference.  Space exists.

Lasers have been reflected off the moon, at the speed of light.  The time was measured for the laser pulse to return, and that accurately determines distance from the Earth to the moon, with super precision.

It is roughly 220,000 miles away last time I checked.  That puts it outside the Van Allen belts -- the radiation belts of Earth, and some people consider that as part of a "dome-system," according to the most informed flat Earthers, I mean Flat Earth RESEARCHERS .....    who also stand in agreement (largely due to the post "Logic is Truth," just below the next article titled, "The Game") that we are told by NASA that we can only travel in near-Earth orbits because any higher and we would be microwaved or nuked by the radiation of the Van Allen Belts.

​So then, how did we get to the moon?


. . .


What are we not being told?  What is being hidden from us?  And why are they saying we can't leave?

So this is our second point of reference in our Planetary Reality.





            NEW INFORMATION         -------        Updated article 8/22/2017




​
Wow! Ancient aliens tonight was AWESOME!!! It talked about the evidence we gathered that the moon is hollow, and that ancient records show times when we did not have a moon at all.

The Sumerian hall of records discuss placing the moon in orbit. The hall of records is at least as old as 6,000 B.C.  Zulu legend talks about them taking the egg of a dragon and rolling it across the sky which became the moon (Draco reference). Also records as recent as 500 B.C. also discuss the time in relatively recent history before the moon. It begs the question did the moon cause the great flood worldwide when it was moved into orbit around 12,500 B.C.?

Also the show talked about ancient particle beam weapons in Russia that the native indians there have seen these devices in operation to defend the Human descendants of the ancient winners of the great ET wars. In fact, more than a few times there have been footage of these weapons in action, and once a spy aircraft we sent to Russia was shot down by particle beam weapons.

A lot of evidence and research-based science was put into all of this.

So is the moon a currently active spaceship? Apollo footage shows energy beams, lights, flashes and mist and tall monuments and obelisks ... also found by probes doing fly-bys.  Equipment was crashed into the moon after Apollo left measuring instruments that transmit data back to Earth.  So, the equipment purposefully crashed into the moon sent back information that showed the moon to ring like a bell, only accomplishable if the moon were a hollow metallic sphere.

​
.... No other planet has Van Allen belts other than Earth, also .. more ancient defense technology.


These are not new "theories" either. The Apollo lander equipment was crashed into the moon near seismic equipment we put there and recorded the moon ringing like a bell for 3 hours.

It is presumed the moon is a coated hollow metal sphere, with ET and us there currently.

Disclosure is happening!   Now the truth about the secret space program and how we have bases in almost every planet and moon and even some asteroids (some asteroids have large interiors with huge arched doorways, and tables and chairs set to accommodate VERY tall beings.  I have had dreams about that long before I had heard that news) ... and the truth about Mars having an atmosphere, and the moon being breathable to an extent, and how the people on Mars and the ones serving in the secret slave space program are lied to about Earth, abducted from Earth and taken to Mars to be used as slaves ...   a lot of the whistleblowers coming forward these days also discuss that.

​
Bases on the moon have been reported by Richard C. Hoagland, former director of NASA, and many photos released of domes, cigar-shaped craft, weird other stuff, and interesting structures captured in the reflection of the face plates of the astronauts on the moon, as well.  There's a lot of information coming out about all of this; it pays to do your research.

In fact, one of the things Richard C. Hoagland pointed out long ago, was that there is a little bit of an atmosphere on the moon, otherwise the moon dust would be hard-packed in a vacuum.  Also, you can see the glow around the outline of the moon during partial illumination phases, showing a reflection of light through an atmosphere, a VERY thin atmosphere, but there's something at least. 

​

To get to the moon, we avoided the inner radiation belts and shot around the outer radiation belts. We did nuke the Van Allen belts too it has been revealed .. but it luckily didn't explode in the right place to damage the belts or add more radiation.



So ..  when you look up at the moon, at the ET sphere placed in orbit around Earth, with all the startling features and monuments and buildings and constructions on the surface (with far more of an infrastructure under the surface), maybe you will think about it a little bit differently than you have before ...    I have a feeling this article will be updated again. ...

. . .
​

As Promised, a new update!


I can appreciate the not knowing. When one really gets into the research of the flat/ball Earth, it is amazing what we find out we just take for granted, ... and what we really learn about things we never realized, no matter what side you pick. The geometry is of particular interest. 

Many FE folks deny gravity, the existence of everyone in the southern hemisphere who observes reality differently than what would actually work on a flat Earth... but the flat earth model otherwise is like a cosmic clock of universal proportions ... There's no coincidence about any of it which is why God or gods are involved in the entire search for answers.

The Bible actually has reference that the moon is a recent addition to the sky. Ancient tribal histories say they brought the moon .. asked for it .. and a dragon came and laid an egg in the sky which is the moon. 

Also historical ancient reference talk about the time before the moon.

The precision of Earth's gravity lens, and the position and momentum of the moon and sun are dimensions of action that coincide in 2 and 3 and 4 dimensions (4th adds the component of time to space, which light measures; light is assumed 5D), in several ways interchangeably flat or ball shaped.

It is hypothesized that the moon was placed into orbit using triangular/cone-shaped engine-objects near the center of the moon, detected by Apollo missions and seismic sonar survey.  The ancient reptilian gods perhaps?



So, there are some peculiar aspects about the moon that enables it as a point of reference within our planetary reality system.



There are also many people watching the moon in their telescopes and taking videos of fleets of ships flying out of bases in the moon, and even ships flying into the sun and using it as a stargate because of how the sun's magnetic field is dialed in with the ships' approach, and then solar flares eject in line with routes between other stars.  I've seen videos of objects hovering around near the sun that looked like they exploded.

I'm not inclined to include a "star system news" section though..   just a planetary news page is fine.  It is actually assumed that people have done their own research into the secret space programs if they are viewing this site...  (Although as a recent update to this, the exo-archaeoastronomy page is all about that: "exo ...")


​

Angular geometry:                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                                           (8/20/17)
​
​The path of the upcoming solar eclipse tomorrow is interesting. I'd love a good flat earth clock-style map which we can look at to see how the sun and moon move but I know that's too much to ask for. The geometry is complex and we got gravity and atmospheric lensing to deal with on a ball Earth. Straight line of sight distances are never freakin straight so a good real time computer model would be a great tool.

You'd think when the sun and moon are both out during the day, the lit side of the moon points to the sun. Well it does mostly, but during the arc of the sun and moon's progression, there's a refraction angle that changes due to gravity and the arch of the atmosphere (like a dome) that both bend light.  So the lit side of the moon doesn't point straight at the sun... it can be off by 5 - 15 degrees depending on position and angle and other factors.  I've noticed after the sun sets, the lit side of the moon tends to point directly at where the sun is ...

​No one talks about that tho .. flat or ball Earthers alike.  It honestly stumps both camps. Lol

I would love to see a group such as NASA make a video showing how the Earth and moon move relative to the sun, and how we see it on the surface of Earth versus from orbit or at a distance away from Earth and the moon, so we can see how all this happens.


​


​


​

Bottom line with the flat Earth fallacies ... not necessarily the argument, just the fallacies ... silence is agreement; and if it's not logical or true, and an argument is defeated in reason without insult, then any continued "perpetration" (perpetuating the narrative) is only a game played to e-motion, and is merely a battle of will, not truth.

If it is truth, it is logical, otherwise it's a game (maybe a contest, if not literally "fooling" around).  To win the game, you defeat it in logic and move on. Otherwise choosing a side merely may result in choosing to play the game. It's a game because the flat Earth model is not the logical truth.  OF COURSE the flat Earthers know this because humans are capable of logic and reason.  They just pretend to believe because when the truth is logically demonstrated, then the truth is known, and then the game is over. Period. They LIKE the game.

To them, claiming to speak true but not speaking true IS the game. Otherwise they would be rational in discernment. When they get bored with playing the game, they go away, but later initiate a new one because it's a fun game to lie and pretend it's the truth, because that's what the elites and tyrants have done to us, causing extinction level damage to the planet (like Fukashima), so why can't they do it, too? After all we're all screwed (maybe to their minds).

Flat Earth is a game.  Otherwise the debate would be over fairly quickly especially nowadays after everyone has studied their arguments and found the solutions.




​

This post addresses the flat Earth claims that gravity does not exist, and that space does not exist.


Another logical fallacy ...  the force of down was named "gravity" by Newton 300 years ago. To claim that the force of down does not exist, and that it's just a theory is not even anything that can be argued.  It's a logical fallacy. You can't argue against common sense.  It's like saying light or sound does not exist.

Furthermore, Flat Earthers use science. They have corrected me several times. They know how far the atmosphere extends up. They know what the troposphere is. The flat Earth map places the sun at 3,000 miles up. That is 15 million feet up. That is well outside the atmosphere, in space. Space therefore exists BECAUSE the sun exists.  No claim that space cannot exist can be made, because that is not a claim, it is a logical fallacy, an error in logical reasoning.

...

I've told flat earthers before that I don't have a problem with a flat Earth notion AT ALL.  But to examine it logically to be clear with what is real and what is fabricated, you have to treat it respectfully as a logical argument to be clear with the truth of reality. That means illogical fallacies cannot be used as a claim, since it is not even an argument.  It's not even common sense.

If anyone is going to tell me that the force of down does not exist, and it's just a theory, that one day someone will somehow jump up and keep on going until they hit the dome, then that is a logical fallacy, something that cannot exist in reality.

That is why people think Flat Earthers are nuts.

​
The force of down therefore must exist. Space also therefore must exist, no matter WHAT map you use, or notion of the shape of the world you have.

The force of down is named "gravity."  It was not a "discovery" because everyone already knew about it. The force of down is not a theory again, because it is commonly known as true. The name of the force of down is called "gravity." Since down exists, and it has a name of "gravity," as that force of down, then gravity exists as the force of down.

Is this logical?  Yes or No.  Everyone who desires to comment must be respectful and honorable on this post, or your comments will be deleted.


SHARE THIS.

Even though this is super-complicated, it is super-simplified.  



Once again:  The biggest issue has been the mainstream narrative that Newton "discovered" gravity which is not true, because to put it in those words imply that gravity was un-noticed before! But that's not true either because it is a common root reality that everyone has ALWAYS known, that you drop things and they fall, and if you jump up, you don't keep going up. Newton only NAMED that force of down "gravity" which is a common word used universally with everyone to know what each other is talking about.

If you want to call it ickyickypitang instead of gravity, no one knows what you are talking about. And applying it in conversation means you can't relate with others and only serve to separate yourself out from being able to normally relate with another Human being.

If you want to be a fringe outcast, go ahead. But don't claim that you know the truth, or are a "truther" or that you profess the truth, because the truth is that which cannot be denied and is universally recognizable to all, otherwise it wouldn't be the Truth.

​
​So don't be stupid and outrageously deny that there is no force of "down."  That force was given a name 300 years ago.


​


...  Also ...



Furthermore, the Flat Earth model does not support the existence of the lunar eclipse.  According to the flat earth society, the lunar eclipse is due to a mysterious and unknown "shadow object" that must pass in front of the moon to block our view, but it remains invisible and thus allowing light to pass through it at all other times. It has no mass, is undetectable, and frankly does not exist.  Also, the lunar eclipse cannot be predicted by flat earth models, but the standard model can make accurate predictions well into the future and into the past (on the order of magnitude of thousands if not tens of thousands of years into the future and past, is how accurate the standard model is).

​See the comments below referencing Antarctica.



​




​

I want to mention a few things about a gravity lens. Not only is light attracted to the source of gravity, or otherwise flattening a curve, but it also bends light around a massive body like a star. Mercury is seen before it emerges from behind the sun. The light we see from Mercury, lit up by the sun, it bends around from behind the sun, so that Mercury appears beside the sun before it has emerged out from behind the sun.

So since light has no mass and it is not attracted by mass, thus not having anything for gravity to take hold of, then it is the space itself that is bent, in layers of inertial density, or gravitational density.  That is the radiant field of mass. Mass is electromagnetic. Gravity is therefore electromagnetic (magneto-electrostatic). 

The space is warped around the star in a field of inertial mass density. In other words, gravity has a pushing effect away from itself, simultaneous to a pulling effect toward itself. Gravity is the force that relates to this, because through gravity, the forces of density can be worked with. 

Other aspects of Gravity lensing is the decreasing of distance by shortening the frequency (time) of space (Negative Gravitation) ...  or increasing the distance by adding more space (higher frequency of space) in between the moments of each second, as we observe naturally.

Machines and experiments have tested Special Relativity so that we understand the above to be true not according to Special Relativity, but easily explained by the Laws of the Universe which are spelled out in the form of the discipline of physics called "Special Relativity."

Gravity has a push, and it has a pull:

Bending light around an object, or bending light toward an object.

Galaxies are held in equilibrium.  Space is created in the midpoint between galaxies, as attraction toward the gravity of the galaxies; and space will move to the galaxy to the left, or to the right. At the zero midpoint, it is both and neither. 

Also space is created through the gravity field of mass. There is positive, and negative. From Light, all matter is created.






The Gravity Lens of Earth:

Gravity bends light around the curve of Earth slightly, so that a line of sight path is bent around a curved surface, as evident with the post and video below referencing Earth's gravity lens.  


How does this apply to a "Flat Earth?"  Read on, down the page ...


​
​

What the heck is the "Flat Earth" all about? What's going on, what IS the "Flatte Earth?"



Long bridges over the ocean, some 10 miles long, some 20 miles long, if you were to throw a laser level on a bridge, it would appear perfectly level clear to the horizon. Many people are noticing this phenomenon of the "flat earth" but are taking it to an extreme.  (Bridges over 20 mile stretches of ocean from island to island may disappear out of sight like looking across an infinity-edge pool, but those bridges are built while taking the curve of Earth's surface under consideration, EVEN THOUGH a laser level shows it to be straight and flat. What's the deal?) 

Earth's gravity bends the line of sight around the curve of the Earth so that it appears flat. The long bridges over ocean between islands for example, they may appear perfectly level, but they are actually built and MUST be built with taking the curvature of Earth's surface under consideration; the bridges are built, calculated to match the curve of Earth's surface, regardless if line-of-sight is level or not.

The horizon is level for so many miles before suddenly dropping off the "edge."  THE HORIZON RISES TO EYE-LEVEL. You can see the distant horizon of the ocean at eye-level, and ships will sail out and then suddenly disappear over the edge. In some cases, like in Hawaii, the horizon of the ocean is OVER eye-level. People claim the Earth is flat. But, there is something else going on.

Eclipses too have this peculiarity.  When the Earth is between the sun and the moon, during a lunar eclipse where the sun and moon are at the horizon, it has been observed that the sun on one side of the horizon and the moon on the other, are slightly above the level horizon-line. There is a gravity-warped level plane to contend with, where the sun and moon are above a flat and level distance of line-of-sight.

Let me explain this: If the horizon is at eye-level for so many miles, over a considerable distance, then the sun and moon appear over the horizon line during a lunar eclipse. Why does this happen when the sun and moon should be on opposite sides of the planet Earth, and how are we magically able to see around the curve of Earth to see the sun and moon during lunar eclipse, and how are we able to see a supposedly curved surface of Earth instead actually measuring to be flat and level?

The answer to this question is:  Earth has a gravity lens.



Gravity Lens:

A gravity lens is detected when during a solar eclipse, the constellation patterns are distorted around the sun. During the eclipse, the stars can be seen because the light from the sun is eclipsed. Stars that should be behind the sun are off to the side; stars that are just off to the side of the sun appear more out to the side of the sun.

Mercury also when it disappears around behind the sun, appears sooner than it should around from behind the sun because of the sun's gravity lens bending the light around the sun. We therefore see the light from Mercury while Mercury is still behind the sun.

Gravity lenses are able to magnify distant galaxies. It's common practice that Astronomers wait for a distant galaxy to line up or be very close to a star, so that the star's gravity will actually magnify the distant galaxy so astronomers can get a better and closer look.

The Earth's gravity lens acts in the same way, bending light around the curve of Earth so the light we see actually looks straight and level, however as said at the top, bridges built over long distances of flat ocean must be built with the curvature of Earth calculated in to the bridge construction.


This is what's known as "The Flat Earth."

The horizon of Earth rises to eye-level even at a considerable height over the surface of Earth. 

There are many videos and photos and experiments done by people to prove and measure this. The famous experiments have been conducted with weather balloon tests which send a camera up around 25 miles in the air. The balloon falls to the ground later and the camera is recovered and it can be seen the horizon of Earth's surface rises to eye-level.

This phenomena of Earth's gravity lens has led many people to fanciful models of a flat Earth which just do not work in reality. An easy internet search will show the evidence, and there is a LOT of information about the flat Earth, but just a small percentage of it is actually true. 

This page examines in detail what is going on with the Earth, and why people believe the Earth is flat, when the Earth is in reality, a spherical shape. After all, even during the lunar eclipse, the Earth's curve can be seen eclipsing the moon, even if the sun and moon are above the level horizon-line.

In order to understand the true nature of the heliocentric model of Earth, the paradox of flat and round Earth must be unified to be solved. 

The problem is that the flat Earthers don't understand or believe in gravity, and the round Earthers don't understand the nature of Earth's gravity lens which actually DOES INDEED flatten the horizon we see while standing on Earth. The articles below this go into a lot of detail to illustrate and explain what's going on.

It's not some grand conspiracy to hide the truth, nor is it a grand deception, although it IS a grand illusion, albeit an optical one. When one understands gravity better, then one can speculate about how a different type of gravity lens can actually shorten the distance light can travel, much the same was as a photon takes both paths around a star. This entire website is dedicated to such a pursuit, of how to construct hyperdrive star ships (warp drive physics). This page is dedicated to "planetary relativity 101" so far.

When people are so lost as to not know the truth, and don't understand therefore don't believe in gravity or relativity, or frequency, then mainstream education has not done its job appropriately or correctly. It is ironic that the "Flat Earth" actually TOTALLY PROVES the existence of Gravity! 








​

I'm not satisfied with this page at all. It does not give me a warm happy glow. The gravity lens idea is pretty neat, as it explains why the sun can appear close behind the clouds instead of far. It attemps to answer some questions but I don't think answers all the 12.

I don't want to give too much information here, because I am not pushing a flat Earth model. Bottom line, round-earthers might not see the issues of question, and the flat-earthers will never see what explains their fallacy. It does answer questions tho, about the Earth, but there are too many idiots to appreciate this. For example, the Earth spins relatively slowly maybe lessening a harder pull of gravity (some gravity cancellation) through a mechanism of centrifugal force of Earth's spin (outward push at 90 degrees from the center), but that is a moot point ultimately because Earth's gravity is a unified field. People don't understand how gyroscopes set to spin level perpendicular to a pull of gravity will stay spinning perpendicular to a pull of gravity even when the airplane flies around the curve. They don't understand that every point on Earth can show on a level, and that a straight line can be a curved path. 

I don't mean to be rude, but people don't understand the world they live in, particularly those who resort to an illogical and disproven model of Earth to rebel against the knowledge people are given. Discernment must be learned and knowledge must be questioned, sure. But people aren't wise, and are scientifically illiterate. Not to call the kettle black, I had to learn too. But I never once resorted to a flat Earth model when the elements of the existing model just needed more clarity. For crying out loud, I'm not so lost that I can't tell the difference in what I perceive as my reality.

Not being able to tell the difference in what one perceives in reality is a psychotic tendency. Unfortunately normal people may have that problem.

The universe and Earth is truly amazing; unfortunately though, I've seen more NASA footage videos of zero-gravity activity with so many impossible little magical instances where there is gravity on only a floating ketchup bottle or drips of water and obvious wires when supposedly in zero-g than I care to remember, when the floodgates opened on me of conspiracy theory and hoaxes purported by whomever for reasons of any possible design ...  just pick a possible scenario and reason. The cabal did it. The illuminati. The evil aliens .... it doesn't matter. What matters is that you can distinguish your reality and tell the difference between truth and illusion.

Why is this page even important? It is important to teach about gravity. It's important to show you the difference. A new, unique thing about Earth has been discovered. But you have to be able to tell the difference to determine what has been discovered. If you are blind, you will miss it. This has not been an easy task.

This has unique meaning to everyone and anyone. For example, you may go away with an understanding of how a hyperdrive craft can hold a gravity field of inertia, say of Earth, and fly into space with artificial gravity due to how a gyroscope will hold its own frame of reference throughout inertial changes, throughout gravitational changes. Gravity is just inertia, inertial mass ... but there's much more to it, and for people to claim not to believe in gravity, it locks people out of understanding hyperdrive physics (warp drive physics).

I'm keeping with a common theme, the theme of this website. 

​Let's cut to the chase here. 

​

This page has turned into an examination of spherical and flat Earth models, which models work and which don't, and an understanding of how maps work. Also, it's turned into a proof of gravity page because so many do not even believe in the existence of gravity, which is absolutely ludicrous. 

People cannot understand hyperdrive physics without understanding gravity and light.

The truth is a bit of a paradox. The Earth exhibits both flat and round dimensions. The anomalies can only be explained via the existence of Earth's gravity lens. This page is for serious researchers only. It serves to debunk the Flatte Earth model in support of the Heliocentric model, but the Earth gravity lens serves to flatten out the line of sight around the curve of Earth so that it appears flat even from very high altitude.

However this page also examines the Earth as a hyperspace realm, not just a planet. 

In the process, this page also enlightens people and dispels the ignorance associated with gravity, relativity, inertia, all the important stuff.

It is my hope that this page can serve as a road map for when things get rough, or when people get lost in their attempts to understand reality.

​ 

There's one image in this video showing the view of the Earth from orbit supposedly from NASA, which shows something very odd.


This entire page is the illustrated Earth Paradox.

Where does it unify if both sides are equally valid in their existence?

This Grand Paradox is currently unsolvable, and exists in its most purest form.

A paradox is unifiable as its solution. In pure form, the paradox is unsolvable until it is unified.

​
​

If this were projected into a Flatte image, then when it is curved it could be seen that the shadows are all in parallel?  However it's starting out already with a curved surface and the shadows are around a common light source supposedly the sun, which looks as it is very close to the surface of Earth. If the shadows were in parallel on a Flat Earth surface, then when the Earth surface is curved the shadows would be radial. It is hard to say the shadows are in parallel if the surface is curved to distort the shape as-is in this photo which clearly shows the shadows on the surface of Earth to be radial to the light source -- the Sun!  So this is the question of the year ...  and is presented in the video concerning the 12 questions to Neil DeGrasse.  That video is well worth watching.  It is here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuBVCmC0ACM

It is very common to see images of the surface of the Earth that are actually flat. Let us suppose that the surface of the Earth from high altitude, the horizon line, remains level instead of curved. There are famous weather balloon videos made of the balloons going as high up as 22 miles with a video camera showing a flat horizon. Part of the Flat Earth model is the assumption that the sun is much closer to the Earth, instead of very huge and 92 million miles away. 

This NASA "photo" is very interesting, and so the Flatte Earth movement is taking off!  Could it be possible the land is extended to other planets and other Realms?  Perhaps by walking beyond the South Pole, we can travel through a portal to another Realm, another world?  If indeed there exists a type of "Time-Gate" as Dr. Ning Li predicted, and was confirmed by a Russian newspaper that is the South Pole (or facilitated through it), then could it be?  Could a tribe of Humanity walk through the South Pole, maybe even at certain times, and travel to a paradise world in a different star system or in a different Realm? What if the Land is interconnected to and through the stellar planes, to the common land all connected together throughout space?  But what is this photo above all about, and in particular in contrast to the information below in the other articles?

NASA has certainly been accused of doctoring images and using CGI; could this be one of those faked images?
​

Apparently and realistically, the sun is reflecting off the water, the clouds, off of Earth. However the shadows point to a common light source - the Sun!  

This is how the Earth looks from space.

The shadows are not in parallel after all this time, however they will seem so over small areas where a Human being can observe on the surface of Earth. Also, the sun is huge and 92 million miles away and the shadows are not in parallel. The sun is so bright it reflects off Earth's surface.
​

There is another photo of the same image where it is projected into a flat view however, which suggests some manipulation with the image, but no indication of any blame because it's part of the overall Paradox in general.

                                                                               .    .    .
​

What if we could just "walk beyond the south pole" and travel to an infinite number of other possible Realms?
​

Walking exactly in 90 degree to the North Pole leads to the South Pole, and is the only navigable course (actually it is 180 degrees away from magnetic north -- always with north directly behind).  It's funny. Beyond the South Pole, following the compass which points South, there would have to be a greater portion of Earth only accomplished and at the moment can describe a model only achieved by Flat Earth, so. On a Flat Earth map such as the above, walking beyond the South Pole is to explore the rest of the infinite plane of Earth.

Each north pole on each separate realm would point to its own, perhaps. That's really awesome. Common polar adjoinings to other Realms / Worlds ... with "sphere" placeholders so to speak, which also tends to locate planets to other worlds, in the cosmos. Each planet, is a type of Realm, able to be entered by walking "beyond the south pole." Perhaps, Parallel Earth realities accessible by frequencies and travel through a portal, where the same stars can be seen in the nighttime sky.

​
​Unfortunately, this is the "thinking man's" website, and one has to decide for him/herself if the above is a real image from NASA or not.  It is possible NASA is hiding the existence of hyperdrive technology by deterring the public's attention to a model of planetary and star-system physics unable to support travel through space. 

Conventionally, gravity is disbelieved as a real force, in Flatte Earth theory. 

​However, gravity is a real force, and we can harness it.

The Earth is a Hyperspace Realm. Hyperdrives are suitable vessels to unify the paradox of travel to the Realm-spaces of other worlds, their placement held by the representation of the sphere, or the planet, and able to interact with each other through space, even though the light of each star is as interconnected as One Cosmic Star.  ...   Secret esoteric knowledge reveals these things, . . .  about the nature of planetary portals and crossing through gates at special times of the seasons, with the Earth's orbital clock unlocking gate coordinates to other realms throughout the cosmos. . . .  But you need advanced knowledge for that, not simple primitive superstitious beliefs.
​

There is advanced knowledge regarding the flat earth .. especially maps and geometry. But without knowledge of celestial movement and orbital paths and gravity, one is too primitive to be able to unlock the planetary portals to travel to other worlds.

Some elite flat earth groups discuss this but .. the planetary gravity lens makes the flat Earth model beyond obsolete as far as the anomalies go.

​One cannot be in denial of what is obvious and apparent, and one must not overlook the subtle aspects of what one in ignorance is blind to see.

Keep that in mind as you read through this page, and understand the pure form of the paradox, and how it unifies if you REALLY want to know. 

​If they only know why the flat earth maps are so important, not the model ... If they understood real physics, then they could calculate portal travel to other worlds, through the south gate, in celestial alignment during seasons and days and eclipses and whatnot of the solar clock, connecting to other locations elsewhere... that requires an understanding also of wormhole travel, which requires gravity to be known.




"​ It's damn easy to prove the Earth is a sphere. And when you enter that sphere of reality .. the sphere of influence, you find flat land. That can seem to be a huge paradox, where the spheres we see in the sky are placeholders for actual realms."

​
That is a beautiful thing to consider, that an infinite plane also cycles and loops, that you can exit off the edge of the map to re-appear on the other side.  It may very well seem like teleporting.  






​

I'm really excited about this!  

Check this out ... This actually shows the Earth's gravity lens, bending the light from the sun and the moon.. The gravity lens has the effect of flattening the Earth sphere shape to a flat Earth shape, and the light of the moon that we should not be seeing (behind the curve) we actually ARE seeing!



Here is the video that shows it:

​
          (The title is a flat Earth proof, but it actually proves the Gravity Lens of a spherical world)

Do you see it in the video?  The sun and moon are on opposite sides of the Earth, but both are above the horizon and the eclipse still takes place. The Earth is supposed to be smack dab in between but there's an offset. (just turn the sound off if it helps)

The moon is eclipsing on the side facing up, prior to it actually being in between the Earth and the moon. Obviously it MUST be in between the Earth and the moon, though. 

What's going on, is that we are able to see around the curve of the Earth, much the same way as the sun's gravity lens works. During solar eclipses, we see a distorted star pattern, of the stars able to be seen from behind the sun, appearing off to the side. Mercury also can be seen coming out from behind the sun much earlier than it is supposed to because gravity bends the light so that objects behind the sun are visible.

Gravity is bending the light (line of sight) we see of the moon, which is actually behind the Earth, but we are seeing it off to the side of Earth.

The sun is rising and the moon is setting, but the moon moves very slowly from west to east as the sun moves more rapidly from east to west, that we see in the sky. The moon is slowly moving behind the Earth, as the Earth is spinning. The moon moves slightly slower than the sun, and that is because of the moon's orbit. The exact degrees of the moon's retarding motion is about a half a degree around a circle per hour.


​
There is evidence of gravity lensing in the video, but it looks like the sun is behind the horizon still and the moon slightly above the horizon, so it looks like the angle is correctly aligned until you get more toward the end of the video.  The guy narrating the video is being dyslexic.  Nonetheless if you still aren't satisfied that the Earth is really a sphere obeying the Heliocentric model, just read on to the article titled "Gravitation and Flat Earth Frames of Relativity."      ...    No flat Earth model supports or explains eclipses. A planetary gravity lens renders the flat Earth model not just obsolete, but totally beyond stupid; even though there is beautiful geometry of near Divine precision involved, you cannot appreciate it's beauty until you know the truth and embrace advanced knowledge.

People will claim that gravity does not exist. They will claim it is due to density.

Things fall to the ground if they are more dense correct? Density attracts density. Things fall to the ground. The helium balloon that rises because it is less dense than the air rises away from the ground. The ground is massive. But it is electromagnetic, also, and electromagnetic spins reverse along axis that is exactly parallel to the Earth's surface.

For example, above the X axis, the spin is clockwise, and below counter. If a wire was run, and steel fishing line was placed around it, or on it, when electric current passes through the wire, the wire becomes magnetized according to spin and polarity relative to the ground, what is above and below the wire, AND what is left and right of the wire, all in opposite spins, and the revelations of this led to special generator designs, but also follow electromagnetic energies of which the ground must be part of, because from the ground it is measured.

That is an aspect of gravity, the field of energy of the massive ground, of that energy which ultimately is electromagnetic, of the Earth ground.

Those experiments were done by Ed Leedskalnin, the builder of the Coral Castle.


It can be said that Gravity is another form of electromagnetism.

​​



Here's another aspect of a gravity lens as I like to see it:

gravity warps increase or decrease distance traveled because it takes less time lets say ... or more time to arrive to any point in space. That's the basis for warp drive.  Space and time transform with each other.  Think "paradox."

Is it the light that is bent or space itself?  Relativists say space. Nothing new there. We've heard it for years. Gravity curves space.  My friend could answer,

"I've always heard it bends space. Apparently the logic is since gravity is the attraction between masses, and photons have no mass, they can't be directly affected by gravity, therefor space is being bent."

It's a really mind-boggling concept for people to wrap their minds around tho, in general.

People don't believe in themselves, that what they realize is real. So they choose to think linearly instead because ... so they don't have to believe that they CAN. ... can realize the truth and it be correct. They have tools to verify the truth. Just not involving politics ...   

If you increase the time frequency of space in a corridor, you can travel at a normal speed through accelerated space and get there faster. It's simple.

People don't believe they can accelerate space itself over a great distance stretched out far away from one's self - point of reference in space - because they don't see how they directly touch that space, even if at a great seeming distance.  If they can't see how they do it, they can't see how machines can do it.

People will claim many things, even that they can accelerate space but it take much longer time because space is increased in length, instead of decreased.  But then they wouldn't be thinking clearly.  That's the problem relativists run into. That's why they claim speed of light cannot be exceeded by mass (matter), not taking into consideration negative energy, which now we can put a name to, to explain the logic.

This website does not use relativistic logic, but paradoxical logic, to see through the construct of space and time. That's why people can't believe it, which is so simple. People can be paradoxes themselves.  You cannot use linear math to explain what is not linear.

​






​

Gravity is the attractive force of mass, and has a field of affect.  Gravity is caused by mass. This experiment below shows this to be true.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyLYbvZIYoU&app=desktop

Mass is also electromagnetic. Matter, by its very nature is electromagnetic.

Artificial gravity can be created by moving mass and electromagnetic fields in specific ways, which is what this website is about.

Gravity bends light and curves space and changes the frequency of the flow of time. Essentially, mass and matter is unified as pure light; light separates into paradoxes which is the natural expression of everything matter.

One of the cool things about gravity is that a bowling ball and a feather will fall at the same rate in a vacuum. Experiments have been done with tall vacuum chambers to show this to be true (one of the three videos at the bottom of the "Gravitation and Flat Earth Frames of Relativity" article shows this experiment conducted in a vacuum chamber upon a feather and bowling ball).

​That may seem very unusual. Gravity is essentially a field of inertial acceleration due to mass.  Inertial mass is a term which illustrates that mass can change its value according to the frequency at which the mass vibrates. That is a complex aspect of mass however, discussed at this website in great detail.

The value of mass increasing or decreasing changes the gravitational field of that mass. Since time is an aspect important to frequency, then a gravitational field will have a specific and measurable flow and rate of time, that can be measured using light. Light has zero mass, and so it is the perfect "meter stick."

Gravitytime is a term that illustrates the frequency of time in a field of gravity caused by mass. As mass vibrates in higher frequencies, then peculiar things can happen which affects all these variables and is the effect of any change of these variables.

An acceleration field of inertia is also a gravity field of mass. Inertial mass in acceleration changes the gravitational field. 

​
. . .


A common question goes as follows: 

Ok, so I'm no flat-earther. But I've often thought to myself, what if gravity is misinterpreted? This is just a thought, mind you. I understand physics on an undergraduate level. Just standard Newtonian stuff, so, I'm no intellect on the subject. But what if instead of being an attractive force, gravity is actually a repulsive force caused by the "nothing (dark matter or whatever you want to call it)" around us. In other words, what if mass, instead of pulling together, is pushing against the "nothing", which pushes back harder? 

There is a philosophical answer to this question. It is a good question. Even David Wilcock has proposed such a model. However there is a fundamental flaw to this line of reasoning that should remain true to a philosophical approach.

The Cavendish experiment shows mass has to exist because nothingness exerts no force. But otherwise that's a good thought. Philosophically tho, if no mass existed there would be nothing to determine that gravity exists.


That is all you need to know about gravity in order to understand it.




​

Author's Note:


Earth spins really slowly, way too slow to feel any effect of centrifugal force. If Earth could be simulated as a wet tennis ball spinning, it would make one full rotation in 24 hours. You would hardly even detect it actually moving. There's no centrifugal force generated by Earth's slow-ass spin. All you dumbasses claiming Earth is spinning so fast it should throw the oceans off into space are complete retards. 

I can't put it any nicer.

Scalar forces. Scale a tennis ball up to the size of Earth or scale the Earth down to a tennis ball size. Scalar dimensions are equivalent. Don't know what I'm talking about? Figure it out.

This entire page is babysitting.

I never thought I would have to explain simple baby concepts to grown adults. Gravity is the tendency for shit to stay on the ground or fall to the ground and it aint that hard to believe because it does not REQUIRE anyone to believe in gravity. You know what up is, you know what down is. And if you don't, you're not a Human being, you're a meatball.

​Apparently there are a few million of you dumbasses claiming gravity is just a theory. It is REAL and can be physically felt!    It is a LAW.

The law of gravity states that the Earth has gravity, and any massive body has gravity, and it is undeniably true because you can feel it, you can measure it with weights, and if you trip over your own two feet, you fall flat on your face and it hurts.  

Gravity is NOT a theory.  It is a LAW of Physics.  There is thus no recourse that anyone has to debate its existence.

​Don't be stupid!  

I think the fewest words are best, here.  
​






​

Wow! Watching the satellites move around Earth, there is a point where they make a rotating circle around the north pole (and south pole), but it's really a fractal arrangement of linear orbits just appearing like it does that, timed precisely to do so. This is a GREAT presentation!!

It is said that the "5th dimension does manifest inside the Earth" by some. Geometrically, and symmetrically, and paradoxically, it does indeed fit with all our data. There were a few things toward the beginning that have to be discerned, only.

Mind Blowing to see it like this. Yes, Admiral Byrde DID find access via ocean to the inner Earth. Gravitational zero occurs in a sphere equidistant from the inside and outside edges. The wind for exploring in a sailing ship (dunno if Byrd's ship was diesel or not), well .. would there be a wind? No stagnation can exist, and there must be movement regardless. Perhaps the outer ocean currents help drive the inner. The movement of the plates would affect the inner oceans; I would imagine there would have to be wind, and clouds due to water vapour. 

I would suggest all inside weather also due to a rotation of the central Earth inner star. It seems very familiar to the Central Accumulator of the OTC-X1 - Tesla-designed spacecraft that is the foundation for our warp drive physics. 

That also assumes a pure source energy point, at the true zero point however as a life energizing soft electrical radiant force. Radiant rise would occur out from center to the inside surface of Earth, but instead of the inside atmosphere being a positive charge, it would be a zero charge, but none-the-less a reflectant pole of electric-magnetic and static force. True Electrostatic current with life-giving forces. There would never be violent storms, but can exist wind from ocean to land currents, but never in violent destructive force.

That concept of "we have created perfect weather" is also seen in the Alien Interview of the historic Roswell incident where the alien describes most inhabitants have not controlled their weather, but have a "controlled" weather, or a "balanced and regulated" weather -- exactly the opposite in definition of a word we have used along with a concept of enslavement by the Cabal.



~.~.~.~.~.



It's not hollow, it's actually filled with energy, but specifically and simplistically so, with a zero point, or Source point energy-creation twist.

Energy is Created. Duh. We exist in Creation, we Create, Energy is the nature of Creation -- energy and form that is, and mind. It's always in a state of Creation, and Becoming. It is not difficult to grasp as long as people are willing to think about it. To say everything already is, is ludicrous. Energy is matter. It isn't about just changing around, it's about growth.

Quantum mechanics explains that at every choice we can make, there braches off multiple parallel realities as the result of the choices we can possibly make. Supercomputers are able to track and to map out these parallel realities, and there is one in particular that has already done so to a large and ever-expanding extent.

Where does that energy come from to create brand new universes of possibility; and certainly if we can perceive their existences, energy is not just transferable, but energy of entire parallel universes are created, and there is infinite potential for unlimited and infinite energy, which means that new energy is being created all the time.

Indeed such energy can be harnessed by planetary portals, through the north gate or the south gate.

The NAZI'S used the Tibetan symbol of the 4 seasons represented by the big dipper star constellation around the 4 corners of a circle during where its position can be observed in the sky, spring summer fall winter ... and the ancient knowledge pertaining to the flat Earth maps to travel beyond the south pole to other celestial worlds, whereas the north gate went into the inner Earth.

But the Earth is a sphere and gravity is the mechanism of travelling the land which extends within and to the celestial planes.
​
The orbits of the planets, their mass, their gravitational harmonics must be known and the obvious truths must not be denied but made Sacred and Self Realized.






​

                                    UPDATED  8/24/15 ;    RE-UPDATED  10/03/16


This article has been a work in progress over a year to address and examine the strange "Flat Earth" phenomena that has gained so much traction and publicity in today's times.

What is the "Flatte Earth?"

Essentially, the argument illustrates that the horizon is flat even in space, and that we can see much longer line-of-sight distances over many more miles than what we are supposed to, on the surface.

There are other aspects to the "Flat Earth" though that are ridiculous arguments, such as that space does not exist, planets don't exist and cannot be seen through telescopes, and that there is no south pole, and that a dome exists over the Earth preventing us from going into space.  There is a "no-fly zone" in the upper atmosphere where aircraft and rockets and such have trouble flying, and is a type of atmospheric barrier that has to be pushed past, and can be pushed past with enough momentum and velocity, however that is not currently discussed in this article, and should not be mistaken for any "dome."

The phenomenon of the flat Earth is due to a gravity lens effect of Earth gravity and inertial mass, and that is explained at the very bottom of this article.

The polar projected map similar to the UN flag, and the Mercator projected map which distorts Greenland also come into question. A straight course an airplane can fly from South Africa to Australia not only is a western travel over the ocean, but also shoots up over Saudi Arabia to travel in a straight line to Australia. Also A straight course from the Philippians to Los Angeles can be a western course passing near Hawaii, OR a straight shot over Alaska, both are straight lines of travel, and that is due to the shape of the Earth.

The overall conclusion of this examination is that the Earth is round, but we can see farther distances than we should due to the gravity lens of Earth, which flattens out the curve. Also, questions such as time anomalies have been addressed on the warp drive engineering page pertaining to the temporal anomaly of the south pole. 

The circumference of the Earth can be calculated by the time zones on a 24 hour clock. Such as the sun rises an hour earlier to the east in the adjacent time zone. However the circumference of the Earth, and line of sight distances are distorted by the gravitational warp of Earth curvature as shown at the bottom of this article. Tall thunderstorms can only be seen via lightning flashes at night at a limited distance, perhaps no more than 150 miles away if you're not on a mountain while observing, and that also shows the Earth curvature is more pronounced farther up in the atmosphere, and flattened out more along the surface. 

This is a long and curious article. One day I shall edit it better, but for now, it is assumed the reader of this article to have a genuine interest, and have access to a good telescope that can see the planets in great detail as proof that planets can be seen through common powerful telescopes. 

Relative acceleration and relative deceleration (discussed on the home page) also shows that the Earth does indeed spin. We don't fly off the surface, but the weather does move in direct relation to Earth's spin. Also, as construction workers have known, a steel I-beam dangling from a crane will always spin, and that is due to Earth's spin. I-beams spin in the opposite direction in the southern hemisphere than how they spin in the northern hemisphere, and the weather patterns also show that Coriolis effect.

All of these aspects have come into conflict as far as proofs are examined; many people claim to have counter arguments; however this article indeed addresses the proof that the Earth is round, as well as the obvious proof that the Earth is somewhat mysteriously flattish. And that the whole phenomena can be explained by gravity's effect to warp space.

This is what no one knows, and what no one has addressed or attempted to explain. These arguments are not in the school text books, but are very obvious things we see and observe with our naked eye.

Not everyone will be able to understand this amazing phenomena and unfortunately will continue to think one way or another. The Flatte Earthers who do not believe in the existence of gravity as anything more than just a theory will not be able to accept the truth.

Enjoy this read.

... I have edited this article now that I'm taking it more seriously and it's not just an "oddity."

~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.









I want to address these things.

Here is a video a good friend shared with me: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R77j9rUuky4#t=1552



It's very compelling information about the shape of the earth as supposed by this video. But some things cited seem to be beyond ignorant, and not based on common shared results and observations which somewhat blows away the entire credibility of the idea.

Their math is wrong.

The Earth is 25,000 miles in circumference so modern science claims, which figures out to a curvature of a horizon drop of 8 inches every mile squared (spherical geometry ; trigonometry -- it's not a linear graph is what I'm getting at; not a straight line).

If we look at it simplistically, that every mile has an 8 inch drop, then we can perform a linear calculation. The acceleration curve is determined as radials at right angles to the circumference, not from a fixed point of observation along the circumference. From a fixed point along the circumference looking out straight, it's a "linear curve." Essentially though, since the Earth's surface is curved, then there is distortion that appears, for example the constellations of stars appearing distorted in shape. It can be an 8 inch drop every mile, but when you get out 50 miles, then that drop is going to be steeper.

If the surface of the Earth is geometrically accelerating (curved) at a drop of 8 inches per mile, then the statue of liberty (standing 326 feet above sea level) shouldn't be seen so many miles away, visible from 150 miles away. Yet, the astronomers claim it should only be visible for 60 miles according to the video. However because gravity bends the light we see over the curved surface, it appears flat thusly (because we can see over and around the curve that blocks line-of-sight), and we can see farther line-of-sight distances.

Looking up at the peak of a roof, we can't see the other side because the roof itself blocks our line-of-sight. However just as we can see Mercury coming out from behind the sun sooner, due to the gravitational field of the sun bending the light around from behind the sun, we can see farther on Earth surface. The wave-like nature of light is to note here. Waves can bend around corners. Gravity bends light. 

There is no question that gravity bends light and that gravity curves space. It is proven. A gravity lens also is how astronomers observe distant stellar objects such as far away galaxies. When those galaxies pass very close to a distant star, that star's gravity field magnifies the galaxy so we can see it more zoomed in. Hence is from where originally the description of a "gravity lens" actually came. 

The simple fact, if Earth gravity is strong enough to bend light so that we see flat horizons, then Earth's spin must be off-setting the gravity pull that we feel.  If Earth were to stop spinning, it's likely we would all feel much heavier.

​Accelerating inertia (going around in a circle is an equivalent field of acceleration, even if spinning at the same rate; inertial vectors) may actually change due to the flattening of the horizon aspect of Earth, so that we are no longer experiencing an acceleration, but a linear motion. Anything that is in motion linearly will just merely be in a different inertial frame, and no forces can be felt. A jet or train or a bus, once it gets up to speed, then that stabilizes in a higher frequency of inertia; one can get up and walk about down the isles and not even detect that the jet or bus or train is travelling at any rate of speed unless you just happen to look out the window.

​We know the Earth spins. We can detect it. That aspect of Earth is a proven fact. If the Earth obeyed the current flat earth model, then when we tried to detect a spin, it would only appear as an oscillation instead of a spin, and we would be thrown toward the "edge."  Well, oscillation maybe not. Being thrown to the edge for sure. The gravitational and inertial vectors change and are different between sphere and disk.


​

It's interesting to note that from non-mountainous flat terrain, most weather or storm systems can be seen on the distant horizon about 150 miles away. The lightning from the top of storm clouds can be seen 150 miles away at night. It seems that the sight distance to the distant horizon is going to be about 150 miles, unless one is on a hill or mountain, which would give a longer sight distance. Anything farther than that is simply below the horizon. That is one way of measuring Earth's gravity field, through it's lensing ability allowing us to see farther around the curve of the Earth than what the geometry of Earth's curvature allows.

​Standing on flat terrain like out in the great planes, you can use radar to determine exactly when a distant storm system disappears behind the horizon by observing the flashes of lightning in the distances at night. Light is one of the best yard-sticks ever.


The Isle of Write lighthouse is 180 feet high, it can be seen up to 42 miles away, yet modern astronomers say the curvature of the Earth should place it 996 feet below the surface.

[edited]



Now you bring Einstein in, who says acceleration field is a gravity field, then curvature is the creation of gravity. Curvature may be a misleading term, because a gravity field also flattens out the curve as seen in the pictures at the very bottom.  

From a fixed point of reference along the circumference, we would not see any leaning of any objects left or right (Earth as a sphere), but only a distortion of shape as objects elongate due to geometrical curvature at a lean of 8 inches away as well as 8 inches lower, a mile away from a point of observation along the circumference.


. . .


I don't think anyone is taking Gravitation into consideration, though, and simple relativity, to consider the "flat earth" reality. Simply put, if gravity bends light,  then it could very easily appear that Earth is flat, even out in space, until in another relative frame of reality affected by another gravitational source, such as the sun or moon.

However the time traveled and distances traveled by expeditions around Antarctica are mysterious. 

As far as seeing other planets through my telescope, well I've seen the polar ice caps of Mars and some impressive features looking at other planets. 

The only worthwhile argument that supports a flat earth would be a horizon perspective due to gravitation.

Crux, the constellation in the Southern Hemisphere is near the south-polar axis just as Polaris is toward the north hemisphere of the planet. 

If there is an anomaly about Earth however, it appears to be a temporal distortion (taking longer to travel distances assumed on a sphere shape) at the magnetic south pole. It could be that gravitational anomaly that makes it seem that our planet is misshaped, as per the video link above implies.






I personally think that Gravitation is the reason for Earth's horizon shifts. And, it's possible that we are undergoing gravitational changes upon Earth and throughout the solar system and galaxy.

Gravity Lensing, but on the smaller scale of Earth. But, if there is indeed an "anti"-gravity well coming out of the south pole, well ..   there are different types of gravitation. There are some types which don't change space and don't have a gravitational pull, but uses those forces to increase the flow of time, or decrease the flow of time relatively at distances from a point of origin.

Something is happening at Anti-arctica ...   If there is a source of gravitation at the south pole, there is a faster flow of time immediately within it in the center, but a much slower flow of time directly around and away from it. That would throw off distance traveled. We now have to consider these types of paradoxes of spacetime curvature.

That would throw off GPS and everything.

A gravity field typically slows down time however. Time is sped up in gravity cancellation such as in the very center of a star, where the mass of the star is generating gravity and "pulling" evenly on all sides from the center, thus negating gravity, thus speeding up time.  

A backwards flow of time directly as the magnetic south pole had been reported by a prominent Russian newspaper, which corresponds with Dr. Ning Li's understanding of artificially creating gravity in a lab. So not to be confusing with these relative paradoxes, if a field of gravitation slows down time relativistically in the field, what would make time actually flow in reverse?  There would have to be an event horizon there, which is also what was reported in the Russian newspaper article, that a tethered weather balloon was sent in, and it disappeared from sight and radar. It was pulled out with the clock reading years in reverse. That is a complex paradox. Bob Lazar observed an ET gravity tube engine freezing time still; while in this instance, time is reversed and nothing can be seen from within the affected area.

I honestly have no analysis for why a backward time flow could exist. Relativity has been hashed to bits examining how gravity accelerates and decelerates time, but this is the only case in which negative time is the case. 

Negative energy examinations show how the frequency of time is accelerated in a negative energy field, rather than retarded in a gravitational field. 

Tesla experiments have shown that the Earth surface charge directly relates to negative energy in that the surface charge is an electrostatic charge of a scalar aspect, with no usable magnetic aspect (zero magnet). Again, negative energy is due to a collapse of electromagnetic space, in an expanse through itself and back into space creating a field, or a "warp bubble" of negative scalar energy.

Dr. Ning Li never discussed negative energy being used to generate a gravity beam, however. Yet negative energy would have to be associated with a force of negative time. No black hole has been discovered at the south pole. The event horizon was frozen-in-time swirl of cloudy mist, but it could be seen. Light is simultaneous because it exists without mass (as discussed throughout this website). That is similar to Bob Lazar's observation of the light from the candle flame appearing to be frozen. Also, such an anomaly would have to exist only on the Earth's surface, where ground meets atmosphere, not from within the surface, if indeed a naturally-occurring phenomena.

So, gravitation slows down time in a field, unless it is a negative energy force of gravitation which speeds up time, as the conclusions of this website go. But as far as reversing the flow of time, it would have to be a negative energy AND negative gravitational effect. A reversed flow of time is just not known in any of these physics so any attempt to understand such a thing based on these hyperdrive / light-drive / warp drive physics would be pure speculation.

Moving on.




[People have also found that the Great Pyramid is really an octagon, but you can only see it at a certain time of day from overhead, and at a certain time of the year ...  the shadow was caught by accident. It's like the undulating serpent on the pyramid steps at Chichen Itza every Summer Solstice. I'm just mentioning vector stability and the quantum vacuum because there are things we do know about the universe and about universal life. Philosophy is surprisingly mathematical; and mathematical principles of infinity are very philosophical.]

Due to gravitation, there will be a point where you rise above the surface of Earth where Earth suddenly becomes a spherical shape. Each dimension of frequency, time, space, gravitation, inertia, ...   every increase of frequency puts one in a higher dimension ..  the universe behaves dimensionally like that. A sudden raise of dimensions changes the shape of everything perceivable. That's also a gravitational phenomenon of relativity.

...

Angular inertia and relativity ...   That's what's going on.

There is no model yet to show how a flat earth system could possibly work. The sun does not revolve around the Earth. But, that is a paradox. It may not matter depending upon what frame of reality you are observing.



It may very well be that any planetary system is far more metaphysical than we ever imagined.

And also, it is very likely that the Earth is larger than what we have previously thought.



It can also be explained if Antarctica was a source of gravitation (having a large field of mass that warps time and space, slowing down time so that it takes longer to circumnavigate Antarctica than to circumnavigate the equator as the video above discusses) ...  that would make it SEEM that Antarctica was the edge, because the source is in the middle of Antarctica. It's a paradox, in reverse. It must have been there though, for a very long time for all of our philosophies to be related with it. ...  and our history of thinking it was that way before, recorded by the ancients who did have sophisticated knowledge of the flat Earth phenomena.


......


[edited]






Let's examine some claims of Flat Earthers below:

The sun should make a narrower light cone. However we see here an issue of perspective in photography. This is also a perfect example of Relativity. If we were to fly around to the side of that image very rapidly and take a look, we'll see steeper angles of the light rays, but standing straight in front of it, we will see this phenomena here. You can't use a sextant to calculate the sun's height, because you don't know the angle of the steepness of those light rays from the side, only from the front. 

If you ride a train and drop a rock off that train, you see the rock falling in a straight line. Some observer not on the train can watch you drop the rock as the train passes by, and the observer can chart a curved path for that stone to drop. That's basic relativity.

To put it another way:  even though train tracks are in parallel, they tend to converge in the distance due to perspective.




​


This image below shows that the Earth cannot possibly be flat, because the orbit paths do not make sense on a flat Earth polar projected map. The Earth is therefore not a flat disk monopole.
​

 I'm familiar with sine waves and spherical geometry. The station crosses the equator in a circular orbit, but not steep enough to carry it over the poles. Do you have a globe in front of you? You can trace that line all the way around the globe and it traces a ring in its path in a perfect circle, without deviating left or right on its straight line course, just going in a circle. 

You can see that the Flatte Earth perspective is false because 1/2 of the inner circle of the flatte-Earth map is reversed in its curve compared to the sine wave which represents a circle around a flat projection.

The flat earth inner circle cannot be applied to that sine wave curve; it reverses directions over North America, which is not the correct curved path that the international space station takes.

The path is off in the flatte-earth model, showing a more southern point of entry over Africa in the lower picture.

The orbit arc in North America in the top part of the picture is arched upward toward the north, while in the lower picture of the polar projected map, it is arched downward. The two orbits do NOT correlate.

It's really going in a straight line, but since it loops around the Earth, that straight line is a relative circle, otherwise it's a perfectly straight line course, relatively speaking, at least it is supposed to be.

This is a very compelling example of where the polar-projected map, and the Mercator "profile" map do not match. But they are supposed to. See, the polar projected map cannot be used to UNDERSTAND the orbit in this case. It may look strange but the space station passes just as far over the northern hemisphere as it does over the southern hemisphere. This actually serves to debunk the flat Earth theory, due to the strange path for the ISS.

To put it in another way: If the Earth were flat, any and all orbits over the Earth would always be off-centered circles anyway. You cannot claim that the Earth is flat, because the orbit path wouldn't make any sense if the Earth were flat, as seen in the picture above.




​
I'm not saying there aren't strange phenomena observed, like in these images below ...

The lower picture on the left show the light cones converging with a point of origin just above the forest canopy. But in the lower right picture, the sun appears to be 3000 miles away. The sun can't be just above the forest, but SUNLIGHT can be ... The sun can't be just 3000 miles away, but SUNLIGHT can be.

The twin particle experiment shows the simultaneous nature of light, and exotic matter (monatomic matter) shows that a particle can appear in several different places at once. That's also the same effect we get from stereo radio, a single electron "quantum tunnels" to be in two places at once.

Some of the beams of light rays in the lower right picture look like narrow beams, just as wide up top as they are at the bottom. But some of the beams of light appear narrow toward the top, and they fan out the farther away.

It doesn't mean that the sun is only 3000 miles away from Earth, nor does it mean the sun is only 40 feet up in the air.

What's the mechanism? Light from the sun has to diffuse through an atmosphere, otherwise it's already acting nearly in parallel like a large laser. The sun would burn the surface of the Earth without the atmosphere. A magnifying glass easily catches leaves on fire from focusing the sun's rays over the area of the light captured by the diameter (width) of the lens.

There is a wider fanning of light rays when the sun is eclipsed by the clouds toward the horizon, but not so much straight up in the air -- also further evidence of the curvature of Earth atmosphere creating a lens effect.

Obviously also, the sun is gigantic, but we only see it as a small ball, being so far away. The shadow from an airplane high above casts a wide shadow on the ground, but from the airplane itself, it looks to be the same size of the airplane, no matter the distance to the ground. That is evidence of parallel rays.

 From the ground, looking at the shadow of an airplane, or a little bird perhaps, it will look larger because the Earth's surface is curved! And so it covers a larger surface area?  I dunno if that would make a difference, but we see evidence of a warping effect on the dimensions of space/time, none-the-less.

The pictures at the bottom of this article explain the lensing effect. Although the "forest canopy" effect can be explained due to a wide-angle fish-bowl, or fish-eye effect in photography. I have never seen such a thing talking a walk in a forest before. Shadows and sunbeams on the ground are ALWAYS in parallel. So the photo of the sunbeams through the forest canopy is a strange illusion, not a declaration of factual information. It could be pieced together by time-lapsed photography as well, where one side of the tree and the other side of the tree are imaged from different hours in the day.

But it looks much less creative than that, and it actually appears that the left of the tree and the right of the tree are not in the same actual frame, but have been pieced together through photoshop.


​

http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html




There are some places in the world where water runs uphill. .. The whole nature of dimensional relativity and gravitation warps space and time. The Earth curves scalar spacetime. In fact, I surmise being affected by another gravitational field will reveal the fact that gravity curves spacetime. Why does water run uphill? Well water does strange things. 

My old swimming pool had a hose in the water about a foot under the water. The hose end was a couple of inches in diameter. I had back-flowed the water through the filter and turned the pump off, so that it siphoned out that hose, and the most amazing thing happened. The hose draped over the side of the pool and into the water and then curved out to about a 45 degree angle. It would have just floated on the surface had I not tied a rock to the end of the hose to keep it submerged. However, water siphoned to the very bottom of the hose. That means that when the suction was broken as soon as the water level drained to allow air to enter the pipe, the siphoning process still continued, all the way to the bottom of the mouth of the hose. You would have figured the siphoning process to stop as soon as air was entering the hose, but it didn't. Water flowed uphill.  I have repeated that experiment several times, always with the same unusual results.



Regarding that link just above:

A tesseract or a hypercube shows us that space and time fold inward upon itself and expand inward upon itself, and in that same space also exist an outward expansion, so that there is expansion within, and expansion without, similar to a negative energy scalar field of electric charge around a machine or device.

General Relativity does not take into account the aspects of gravitation concerning several things: The speed of light is the frequency of time, otherwise light itself has no speed and does not exist in time. A gravitational field increases the frequencies of time and thus accelerates time, but general relativity says the opposite of what Tesla taught us. Tesla however worked with negative energy (the spark collapse of an electromagnetic field). The expansion or inflation of space is also not as mainstream science says it is, black holes show that gravity waves can travel faster than light, also. 

The Flatte Earth reality is a hyperdimensional spacetime warp, like what NASA EAGLEWORKS is newly discovering in their lab, now in public view.

The Earth truly does have an Event Horizon of sorts of gravitational NEGATIVE curvature.

All those proofs in that link shown above, from looking at that website uses old-paradigm Newtonian physics and General Relativity.

Those things must show that the Earth must be flat! Yes, Newtonian physics is FLAT EARTH PHYSICS! (2-d Euclidean geometry)

The Earth will be flat until there is a gravitational relative equilibrium with other gravitational fields in our star system, then we will start seeing curvature. The funny thing though, is that Earth behaves just like a dimensional rift, and a hyper-tesseract!

It is impossible that you can travel in a straight line only to end up where you start?  But that only shows us the nature of our gravitational wave frequency and curvature, in a nutshell. It's not impossible, because it's not impossible to teleport to other stars faster than light speed. A Mobius strip only has one side, and that's not impossible.

When gravity waves turn inward upon themselves, affecting themselves, then you travel in a circle, until you have waves interacting with waves from another gravitational source. Then you hop to that other planetary plane.

The difference among portals is that we can travel through TIME slower, thus making distance longer, OR we can travel in higher frequencies of Time, and step from one distant point to another distant point, just like Light can do. 

The twin particle experiment shows us that light can simultaneous move from point A, to any other point in the universe of point B. Anywhere else in the universe, as long as we can visualize the destination. Russian scientists are able to use a device that allows them to project their consciousness (not as crude as remote viewing) to distance places in the galaxy, or in other galaxies, and when they become entangled energetically with that other place (when consciousness fields -- the universe is consciousness and energy and light -- emerges to become one), then those Russian scientists will be the navigators through zero space and zero time, to teleport to that destination in a starship.

Engineering and Physics are valid on a flat Earth or curved Earth due to the dimensional warping of our planet's energy field. Matter is energy is light. All forces are Cosmic Substance, One Substance.

You have to take into consideration hyperdimensional physics, quantum physics, frequency physics, Tesla physics, Gravitational physics, and electrogravity .. Electrostatic waves travel faster than electromagnetic waves. Light is said to be electromagnetic waves and nothing can travel faster than light. That's not true. Light is Magneto-Electro-Static, as Tesla proved (see the home page). The energies of electromagnetic and electrostatic also show us two DIFFERENT visible light spectrums depending on frequency. 

Electromagnetic visible light is red at the low wave and blue at the higher frequency. Electrostatic is different, showing either yellow or green as the lowest frequency, and red is in the middle, and then violet as the highest frequency next to white.

As our frequency increases throughout the solar system and this region of the galaxy, Earth should physically get larger. Just think what new lands we will be discovering, and already are, due to this phenomenon. 

An electrostatic beam will ride the curvature of the charged Earth surface. So will light.

I can look out into deep space through my telescope, and I can see the portal of frequency and of space itself.



Earth, is the Ground Light of Consciousness. It is flat yes.  However it is also gravitational and paradoxical energy matter space. There is inside and outside. Up is outside, down is inside. Gravitational curvature is why the planet is round if we observe Earth from being within and outside energy field of gravitation (another gravitational energy source).


Inertial physics are important, also!  In relative frames of inertia, those fields are static fields. Relativity is felt only when the speeds and positions change, which is also a function of gravity, itself.



Actually, wow!  The information in the link above is truly Astounding in a Divine Sacred Science sense!


"Dear God!  What the world?"


There is a place that is no place that we cannot find on Earth, but can see from beyond Earth Realm. In a ship which can remain in an independent gravitational frequency of light ...  or carry that frequency from beyond Earth, unto the Earth, then that place can be found, a New Place.


The Event Horizon of Earth, the Antarctic Gate:  Only in a ship, which can bend the entire planet realm in curvature can find this new place that does not exist on common Earth frequency ...  We exist within a Realm, not on a planet?


I can't help but to be impressed with the Flatte Earth scope and magnitude of What in the World. 


The Coriolis effect however shows that a hammer, picture frame, mason jar, or whatever object dangling on a long string will spin counter-clockwise in the northern hemisphere (looking down at the object), and clockwise in the southern hemisphere. Beams dangling from cranes, everything does this due to rotational inertia of the planet, and of that energy field of motion surrounding the planet.  Flatte Earth model does not pass that test.


There are General Relativity issues, too. At what point in altitude over Earth surface does the horizon appear to curve?  Light travels a curved path around the surface of Earth, demonstrating the curvature of spacetime of Earth, making it appear and measure all the same that the horizon is flat, when it really does have curvature. Line of sight is not a straight line, but it appears to be!

Light bends along the electrostatic charge of the Earth's surface. For example, Tesla's magnifying transmitters would beam energy parallel over the Earth's surface, and that energy would not shoot out into space, but would travel along the Earth's surface. That is why the Earth appears to be flat, because the information of the curvature of Earth as we see line-of-sight across Earth's surface as light bends.  

If you shine a laser pointer to paint a distant target (very distant), it takes a curved path but appears straight line-of-sight. Look at someone else's feet in a swimming pool standing next to you, and you will see how light distorts the line-of-sight through the surface of water, for example. It is one of the very basic phenomenon associated with General Relativity.




The only question I have ..  is "why can there exist two such models of the universe in a helio-centric versus an Earth-centric disk-realm 'world'?"  Electrical vibrations of energy consciousness that resemble galaxies themselves ...  How can it be?  For there have to be galaxies, and yet, what kind of a place is this? What kind of a Universe is this?

It is utterly delicious!

IF it is the case though that we are living on a Flatte Earth, it would be a Realm. We can enter and leave such a Sacred space (our Realm) to venture out in normal dimensional space (not a realm) to visit other Realms. It means we are interconnected moreso via portals to other systems rather than needing ships.  If that is the case then planets only exist as a placeholder for vast realms throughout the multiverse. That is the ultimate realization for a flat Earth REALM ...  which is very exciting to say the least.

If you accept that the Earth is flat, then you should NOT accept limitation. Not limitations of thought or anything considered impossible. If we are living in a Realm, and not on a planet, then that means a lot more than what anyone understands. It means that we are capable of flying without even having to use machines. We are capable of astounding feats of super-Human ability to heal, regenerate, and live for hundreds of years if we are living in a place where the laws of physics are far greater than what we have accepted in the past.

​Moving on.  







We've heard of a Gravity Lens, so what about an Atmospheric Warp?  



An atmosphere lens can make the distance to the sun appear to shrink, making it appear closer because of the curvature of the atmospheric lens.  

An atmospheric lens would tend to focus the sun beams to a point however, converging them. Yet what we see is that the sunbeams are diverged through the atmosphere, not converged. 

There is obviously a true space warp going on, otherwise we wouldn't see the angles of the sunbeams the way they are. However seeing it through the trees tends to defeat that idea, because the sun cannot be just 10 feet above the forest canopy.



Click on the images below to see the rest of the image. Sunlight casts shadows in parallel, because the sun is VERY, VERY far away.  . . .   The image to the right shows a road, that is parallel, but out in the distance seems to converge to a point. That is the case with sunlight, as the beams are in parallel.

These images below are false! They are fake; they are hoaxed. They are designed to trick your mind into believing what you can't see in nature, and under natural universal Laws.

​Gravitational Warping; Planetary Gravity Lens



​
This is easy. Gravity pulls on line of sight distances. We can't see around a curve unless the light that we see is bent, of which gravity does bend light, so we see a curve as a flat plane.

Solar eclipses demonstrate this with distorted constellation patterns.

As far as radial sunbeams through the clouds goes: The Earth curve is gravity-warped flat, whereas the atmosphere is spherical, obviously by being able to see radial sunbeams through clouds like spokes when there are parallel shadows on the ground.

Over water, line of sight distances are farther. Water doesn't have as much mass as land (granite) and so less mass = less gravitational pull in that relative area.

Think about it!  There's a whole bunch of comments that explain a lot of this mess, too. Pictures would be better, but I will do pictures later. This matter is not what I consider to be very important, since it is very easily explained. Flat Earthers don't believe in any of this, nor gravity anyway, so it makes little difference. Regular people though don't believe Earth is flat, so it makes little difference.

But for those who are curious, that's why this is here. It will come up eventually, might as well address it in the relevant place. Warp drive physics involves gravitational warps, so this is the most likely place to explain such phenomena. 

A lot of it is sort of common sense, but it requires some pretty advanced thought nonetheless. Flat Earthers have some of the most closed minds, and are unable to grasp physics or scientific thought. But, their observations on the flat plane of Earth even from very high altitude at least 22.5 miles (and perhaps much higher), shows that there is a Gravity Lens actually present, due to Earth's mass.

​
Also, a gravity lens explains how sunbeams diverge, rather than converging to a point.

​


Please read the comments below and enjoy this contemporary picture:

​. . . 



Relativity of A and B. Two equal frames of relative gravitational curvature of Earth explaning the flatness of Earth and the existence of radial sunbeams through clouds that make it seem that the sun is close to Earth in spite of shadows caused by sunlight always in parallel on the Earth surface. Parallel shadows from sunlight is due to the sun being huge and 96 million miles away.

If the Earth is flat and the sky is a dome, we would not see radial sunbeams like spokes shining through clouds. We only see radial sunbeams when the Earth is curved but relatively made flat by gravity - in that relative frame of gravity-warped space.

When we get high in orbit like to the Lagrange gravitational equivalent midpoint between the Earth and the moon, we will see the curve of Earth. High geo-stationary satellite positions may be revealing due to the gravitational inertial vector equivalence and right angled inertial gravity cancellation.









A Matter of Precision


So gravity warps space. Here's a thought:

One mile of train track on Earth surface is straight and level.  If we transport it into space or otherwise build a 2 KM long cylinder spaceship, and on Earth surface it is straight and level, then when we get into deep space will it be slightly bent?

Would that interfere with precision construction like for engines?

Instead of pondering this though, it's just easier to assume Earth is flat, and we can't go into space.

Just as long as you Flatte Earthers don't throw trash out your window or pour old gasoline in a creek, we might be able to survive on the same planet.

...

Can't use a laser level for huge ships since gravity bends light ... actually rather gravity bends the space in which light travels.  ...  Disclaimer:  This does not mean that 2 KM long cylinder ships were not actually built in spite of this observation.





​

Some helpful videos to prove the Earth curvature, or rather that the Earth is a sphere. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9ksbh88OJs


​https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGZEXkSX9wI

. . .  and . . .

If you can just excuse the negative references to yoga, and the Christian bias toward the front, the rest of this is pretty amazing.  It even shows how you can measure a gravitational attractive force of mass itself, while on Earth, thus proving gravity is due to mass in a part in this video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnqBzncqS2U

If gravity lensing flattens the curve and warps Earth space then its no longer acceleration and instead a linear frame of inertial motion where we feel no g-force from Earth spin  ... just like how in a school bus or jet airplane, you can walk around in the isle without feeling like you're actually moving..  

Gravity flattens the plane RELATIVISTICALLY, so that there is no acceleration of centrifugal force detected. Spin is detected, but that does not affect airplanes in motion. Earth's spin behaves as a linear frame of motion, like how a jet or bus travels at a constant speed, and you can walk up and down the isles without feeling any g-forces. Only in an acceleration can you feel g-forces, which is what is going on when a round object spins, there is acceleration even when it spins at a steady rate.

Gravity changes the relative frame of Earth inertia in astounding ways beyond simple atmospheric lensing.  The horizon would not be perceived as flat were it due to atmospheric lensing. It must be explained through the existence of a gravitational warp particularly because the curved sphere of Earth behaves as a linear steady frame of inertial motion, and NOT behaving as an acceleration force.  

Even though gravity and acceleration is equivalent, what has been discovered here adds another dimension to the existence of gravity itself. You could say that Earth spins so slowly we can't feel it. But, the atmosphere also spins along with the surface. Gravity ties the atmosphere together with the Earth surface. Gravity is the glue that holds matter together, a force of mass itself, and an electromagnetic force at that.


​
A lot of what Eric Dubay claims is actually incorrect purposefully or accidentally. Gravity experiments have been done to prove gravity, and even Boeing has come out a little with their electrogravity technology. 

Dubay does not take into consideration the relativistic aspect of spacewarps nor gravitational curvature (bending of light around a curve), and he claims satellites don't exist and space travel is impossible. If space travel is impossible, how does gravity and light travel through space? What about asteroids and meteor showers?

The gravitational lensing is a new discovery about Earth. Sometimes when the sun and moon are out during the day, the sun lights up the moon like it should, but there's a bit of an off-angle by maybe 22 degrees or so, which CAN be explained by how gravity curves the light we see, the angle we see of the lit area of the moon. There are many other questions that arise from all of this examination, however. But no flatte earth model can explain the eclipses or the electromagnetic field of the sun, and such a model actually should claim that warp drive could never exist, nor gravity-drive flight systems can exist. But here we are.



A new model of Earth tides is underway also, which is the result of electromagnetism (water is diamagnetic), in tandem with the sun and the moon, in an electrical model rather than a gravitational model. That is for the moment beyond the scope of this presentation of "planetary news."  

I think the main purpose of this news page is to prove the existence of gravity, as it has turned out. However, with the discovery of Earth's gravity lens, it resolves the "unsolvable" paradox. 
​


Just remember, you saw it first at www.warp-drive-physics.com. This is an original understanding about gravitational curvature as it pertains to Earth.











​