This is the latest mechanism to explain how a higher temporal frequency can exist to the ship and to the pilots without incurring a higher gravitational field which according to Special Relativity would slow that time frequency down, relatively to someone standing outside the gravitational field.
Putting it that way, I don't see the issue. But, there may be an issue when dealing with our standard calculations and mathematics. I say that the time frequency field compresses, lengthening the time frequency wave to slow time to a crawl near an event horizon (it doesn't have to be an event horizon from a black hole, but should serve to illustrate gravity-space compression from weaker gravity fields, and the time dilation.
When space compresses, the time frequency compresses. Now, what if space didn't compress, but the time frequency speeds up; would that create an event horizon and yet incur the time dilation issue from special relativity?
We WANT the time frequency to compress, to get faster, so that the ship moves in a field of faster time relative to the outside universe, NOT slower time! But when that happens under conditions of gravitation, we get a spacetime warp which is backwards. By cancelling out the inertial gravity field which generates very high mass, how can it be shown that the frequency of time remains very high?
That is a complex issue. But that right there is the simple solution. It has everything to do with frequency though, NOT relativity.
What is time? Time is not a thing of its own. Time has no axis. It's a thing of frequency, of the motion of space. Space has an axis. Light should be the Y axis, because at zero time (light), space is undefined.
Time is "moved" because space is moved.
When space is compressed under gravity, time frequency is higher, but outside that gravity field is a red shift, which tells us frequency (of space, seen as time) is lower surrounding the field of gravity, because of the compression explained in the blog article below this one.
The only difference, since gravity is inertia according to Einstein and relativity, we want to keep the time frequency high so we move very very very fast. Otherwise under gravitation the faster something moves, the slower it goes in time. We want to go fast in time, which reduces the distance of space, which is opposite of relativity.
We want to reduce our inertia (mass) also. By reducing the inertia, then it won't pile up and build up so high, and we can travel fast in time without dragging behind with an overloaded inertia.
It's just that simple, though. It shouldn't be considered "Gravity cancellation," but "Inertial cancellation."
Well that makes even MORE sense!
That is the whole solution, the whole effect, the whole aspect of a warp drive, is achieving the conditions of inertial cancellation which also raises the time frequency. Pilots wouldn't feel acceleration forces if there is no inertia.
The simple solution is that mass is lowered, thus lowering gravity (cancelling inertia), but the time frequency increases.
I don't think special relativity can make such calculations or provide a mathematical proof, because it's too much like using special relativity to cram a square peg into a round hole. Even though I claimed special relativity is no longer in conflict, but it's really the model of physics depicted by special relativity that is no longer in conflict.
This is the mechanism I've been talking about all this time at this website, but "Cancelling Inertia" is perhaps the BEST way to look at this approach of warp drive mechanics.
There are two models which shows increased frequencies -- in the presence of high gravitational compression, and in the presence of very little gravity at all (light as the unity of frequency; in layman's terms, the highest frequency possible, and that is also according to the metaphysics). Cancelling inertia should very well increase frequency, but only when there is something of a frequency to work with!
In any case, according to Otis T. Carr, this is the whole basis for what the OTC-X1 does.
Since there are two ways to look at frequency, being higher in conditions of extreme gravitation and in conditions of very little mass (because light is the Y axis, not time), then what we have is a win-win situation.
It does not matter why gravity does what it does to time. THERE IS NO TIME. We're not even DEALING with gravity, we're dealing with FREQUENCY (quantum gravity -- waves).
All that matters is that we know that gravity does something to time thanks to Special Relativity.
We can't necessarily look at curved space to find a solution, but must look at frequencies of inertial space.
So this is a new type of physics, a brand new model, but it's really not. It's a model built on contemporary physics! But we're now at the point to have to develop a new form of mathematics built around light-based unity in order to explain what we've known for 100 years.
It has been that issue in mathematics, treating time as having an axis, which has prevented these realizations from ever happening. More of this is explained in the post below, and in the "LAU-X3 Dragon Eye" section on the warp drive engineering page.
THAT RIGHT THERE is the reason why it has taken pages and pages, and a comprehensive website to explain something so simple to where it can be believed.
I like the inertial / gravity cancellation model because it shows that it takes a high frequency of mass acceleration near light speeds to cancel the effects of lower Earth gravity, and to cancel the effects of the gravitational field in the solar system created by the sun (which is not a black hole and so it's gravitational inertia is not going to be accelerated nearly as fast as an engine capable of accelerating protons to near light speed. Electrons already do travel at light speed. That's something we can work with, also).
High frequency mass acceleration creates a wave, so that a counter-spinning wave can create two waveforms that cancel when 180 degrees out of phase. Gravity waves, inertial waves, that's the waves that can cancel out. But it TAKES high mass acceleration and high gravity to cancel gravity, which is an easy thing to see.
It doesn't quite cancel inertial motion, in the sense that the waveforms cancel, but there is still a lot of physical motion and a huge amount of energy and frequency generated by the engines in motion. Well then there it is! Movement through time, but where a warping effect upon space curvature is neutralized. Why do I even want to learn Special Relativity when the thing that it calculates is phased out to a zero in the warp drive engine?
Whereas time dilation effects are calculated using gravity fields, motion, and space using contemporary mathematics and relativity, then by taking away gravity fields in space, there is no basis for calculations in special relativity at all!
All that can be said is that the terrible time anomaly that "the faster something goes, the slower in time it goes" just goes away without gravity and inertia (motion) involved in space.
That's why special relativity is not in conflict with warp drive physics! There becomes nothing to argue about!
Peace at Last.
Why does a gravity field slow down time according to relativity? It's because of density.
Light is the unity. Matter is in paradox to light. Matter comes from light; matter is the paradox of light. Light is the unity. The more dense with mass and thus gravity something becomes, the more it incurs a time frequency -- paradoxical separation from itself. See "Paradoxes of Unity" on the General Blog page.
The more dense, the more separation in time, the more gravity, the slower things get in time.
The closer to Light, the less dense, the faster things get, the less separation between the paradox of matter.
By neutralizing gravity and mass, we achieve light speed, AND faster time.
That is the Unified Truth.
.... that's all I can say without making a simple mechanic into something very, very complex. You just need to know that warp drive will work. At this point, an entirely new branch of physics opens up. If we can travel at light speed, without it taking time to cross a distance of space, then that is the objective. The limitations of the machine itself is what makes it a warp drive. Because now, light speed has frequencies.
Because of Alcubierre's equations, we know that negative energy means that the ship's engines will take the pilots beyond a point of zero mass, dipping into negative mass, and then we're dealing with tachyons and time travel far beyond just a mere speed of light, but real travel beyond the speed of light.
I do mention travel through time on the warp drive engineering page. I make the relation negative mass means travel backwards through time, due to light being the "infinity event" in zero time.
Negative mass however does illustrate a speed of travel faster than light, also.
That is another paradox to solve!
As long as there is forward inertia, there should be forward time (mono-polar vortex). The vertical core introduces a clock, and a point of reference within space (that of gravity). Removing that point of reference from space, if one were to use mass-accelerating engines at the speed of light, the Human mind may not be able to handle the shifting realities, and could end up going somewhere else than otherwise intended! That is why Ascension and metaphysics must be understood. Otherwise, we can safely deal with warp drive physics rather than hyperspace teleportation; although, without a frame of reference in space, travel into negative space and transformation into light, and beyond able to travel to any point in space at once is a reality. But instead of opening that reality up, we can safely introduce a vertical engine core, knowing that teleportation exists at the zero point, and so there will be elements of teleportation involved regardless.
The vertical core as a mono-pole inertial vortex also keeps it going forward in time (in polarity, and in one way) -- keeping it tied to space and moving at a much higher frequency THROUGH space resultingly. If there were no polarity, there would be no space. We don't want to disconnect the ship from space because then ONLY the focus of the pilot's mind would determine the reality of where the ship manifests (arrives) in parallel time to its destination. By design, the vertical core can be disengaged, however, while the outer ring runs in isolation or in tandem with the X-1 lower engine . . .
A beam ship is the way the ship moves, making teleporting hops (hyperspace), because we are not going to be doing a repeat of the Philadelphia experiment!
This is why some light-based metaphysics is important.
The ship will travel faster than light speed using an outer ring drive. At negative frequency and negative energy as seem with light as the zero (the Y axis), with forward inertia in space (regarding the inclusion of an inertial / gravitational vertical core), then there can be travel faster than what the normal frequencies of spacetime allows for, traveling faster in time to cover a distance that is anchored to the ship through the vertical core. Without the vertical core, the ship would leave spacetime altogether beyond any common frame of reference we would have for it.
There is absolutely no linear way to view this, such as A does not lead to B does not lead to C, then D, then E, in a ordering of continuity.
Time is non-causal according to quantum mechanics.
However simply enough, if we can arrive to a distant place before we left (the negative energy value across time), but still have to travel through SPACE to get there, then we are travelling faster than light.
I don't think we should be concerned with instantaneous travel to a distant location just yet (teleportation), because there are a few paradoxes to consider about that, and I want to stay focused on the physics of hyperspace and warp drive travel (through hyperdimensional time; hyperdimensional fields of light-space).
With this, we now have a warp drive starship, depending on what technology is used in the outer ring drive. If we can't figure out how to accelerate matter at light speed as suggested by "John" of the secret space program (See the Promise Revealed link), then we can figure it out OTC-X1 style, and from THERE then learn how to accelerate matter magneto-electrostatically and superconductively in an exotic state to near-light speeds.
I'd say the physics of WARP DRIVE are 100% right now, but the engineering is about 80%, at this point, best case.
This makes sense to me, but there are as I said, a few paradoxes left to resolve logically between time travel and interstellar teleportation, while maintaining a focus around the engineering capacity required for warp drive. An understanding of common frequency is required to understand how the engines operate, and the engines depend on an understanding of frequency to work (and to be built, knowingly). I am unsure how frequency applies, at this point, in pure light-space.
That is one of the objectives of metaphysics.
So .... To Summarize:
As I'm re-reading this, every time I reach a point where I can easily just wrap it up simply, I expand upon it and expand upon it, not stating the obvious but by building upon the obvious conclusions.
I guess you're supposed to be able to recognize the obvious which is why I wrote it this way. Seems if we could have seen the obvious this whole time we'd have it by now.
I'm unable to just spell it out, because spelling it out doesn't explain anything. Zero mass, infinite time. That's pretty much it, spelled out. ..... Mass accelerated to infinity, zero time. Event Horizon.
Inertia is gravity is mass. (Equivalence)
Bringing one of those values to a zero is Light-Space, or Infinite Time all at Once.
Looking at the proportional relation above, Zero mass, infinite time : Infinite mass, zero time
When inertia; gravity; mass is brought close to the infinite limit of a zero, time frequency exponentially increases proportionately.
That is our energy equation of a warp drive.
When we are dealing with engineering, then an infinite limit of mass is light speed. That is the reason why the frequencies also get high in the vertical core, but instead of allowing a gravity wave to build up to incur a time-dilation problem according to Special Relativity, we take our infinite limit to the other end of the spectrum, instead of bringing mass to a limit of light speed (where it's mass will exponentially increase to prevent it from ever acheiving light speed but it can be so close that it can be calculated AT light speed PRACTICALLY, while still maintaining FORM), we bring mass to a limitation of a zero. In either case, we're still dealing with light -- mass at light speed, or mass at a zero which is simultaneous light (another way to view light speed, but without any time; able to be anywhere and everywhere at once).
This is also why I call it a "Light-Drive."
Gravity cancellation (zero mass) while yet maintaining a point of view within spacetime as a physical being is important! That's why there's a vertical engine core, and that's why both sides of infinity are used in vortex shape.
These physics can operate within a scope of magneto-electrostatic resonance frequencies to do the engineering job without having to accelerate mass to light speed, but while working with the electromagnetic energies of mass and inertia and gravity, itself, in resonance, basically meaning that a slower speed will achieve a higher energy of acceleration.
That engineering requires its own type of physics, but it all unifies around light (magneto-electrostatic Equivalence).