This is the latest mechanism to explain how a higher temporal frequency can exist to the ship and to the pilots without incurring a higher gravitational field which according to Special Relativity would slow that time frequency down, relatively to someone standing outside the gravitational field.

Putting it that way, I don't see the issue. But, there may be an issue when dealing with our standard calculations and mathematics. I say that the time frequency field compresses, lengthening the time frequency wave to slow time to a crawl near an event horizon (it doesn't have to be an event horizon from a black hole, but should serve to illustrate gravity-space compression from weaker gravity fields, and the time dilation.

When space compresses, the time frequency compresses. Now, what if space didn't compress, but the time frequency speeds up; would that create an event horizon and yet incur the time dilation issue from special relativity?

We WANT the time frequency to compress, to get faster, so that the ship moves in a field of faster time relative to the outside universe, NOT slower time!  But when that happens under conditions of gravitation, we get a spacetime warp which is backwards. By cancelling out the inertial gravity field which generates very high mass, how can it be shown that the frequency of time remains very high?

That is a complex issue. But that right there is the simple solution. It has everything to do with frequency though, NOT relativity.

What is time?  Time is not a thing of its own. Time has no axis. It's a thing of frequency, of the motion of space. Space has an axis. Light should be the Y axis, because at zero time (light), space is undefined.

Time is "moved" because space is moved.

When space is compressed under gravity, time frequency is higher, but outside that gravity field is a red shift, which tells us frequency (of space, seen as time) is lower surrounding the field of gravity, because of the compression explained in the blog article below this one. 

The only difference, since gravity is inertia according to Einstein and relativity, we want to keep the time frequency high so we move very very very fast. Otherwise under gravitation the faster something moves, the slower it goes in time. We want to go fast in time, which reduces the distance of space, which is opposite of relativity.

We want to reduce our inertia (mass) also. By reducing the inertia, then it won't pile up and build up so high, and we can travel fast in time without dragging behind with an overloaded inertia.

It's just that simple, though. It shouldn't be considered "Gravity cancellation," but "Inertial cancellation."

Well that makes even MORE sense! 

That is the whole solution, the whole effect, the whole aspect of a warp drive, is achieving the conditions of inertial cancellation which also raises the time frequency. Pilots wouldn't feel acceleration forces if there is no inertia. 


The simple solution is that mass is lowered, thus lowering gravity (cancelling inertia), but the time frequency increases. 

I don't think special relativity can make such calculations or provide a mathematical proof, because it's too much like using special relativity to cram a square peg into a round hole. Even though I claimed special relativity is no longer in conflict, but it's really the model of physics depicted by special relativity that is no longer in conflict.

This is the mechanism I've been talking about all this time at this website, but "Cancelling Inertia" is perhaps the BEST way to look at this approach of warp drive mechanics. 

There are two models which shows increased frequencies -- in the presence of high gravitational compression, and in the presence of very little gravity at all (light as the unity of frequency; in layman's terms, the highest frequency possible, and that is also according to the metaphysics). Cancelling inertia should very well increase frequency, but only when there is something of a frequency to work with!

In any case, according to Otis T. Carr, this is the whole basis for what the OTC-X1 does.

Since there are two ways to look at frequency, being higher in conditions of extreme gravitation and in conditions of very little mass (because light is the Y axis, not time), then what we have is a win-win situation. 

It does not matter why gravity does what it does to time. THERE IS NO TIME.  We're not even DEALING with gravity, we're dealing with FREQUENCY (quantum gravity -- waves).

All that matters is that we know that gravity does something to time thanks to Special Relativity.

We can't necessarily look at curved space to find a solution, but must look at frequencies of inertial space.

So this is a new type of physics, a brand new model, but it's really not. It's a model built on contemporary physics!  But we're now at the point to have to develop a new form of mathematics built around light-based unity in order to explain what we've known for 100 years. 

It has been that issue in mathematics, treating time as having an axis, which has prevented these realizations from ever happening. More of this is explained in the post below, and in the "LAU-X3 Dragon Eye" section on the warp drive engineering page.

THAT RIGHT THERE is the reason why it has taken pages and pages, and a comprehensive website to explain something so simple to where it can be believed.

I like the inertial / gravity cancellation model because it shows that it takes a high frequency of mass acceleration near light speeds to cancel the effects of lower Earth gravity, and to cancel the effects of the gravitational field in the solar system created by the sun (which is not a black hole and so it's gravitational inertia is not going to be accelerated nearly as fast as an engine capable of accelerating protons to near light speed. Electrons already do travel at light speed. That's something we can work with, also).

High frequency mass acceleration creates a wave, so that a counter-spinning wave can create two waveforms that cancel when 180 degrees out of phase. Gravity waves, inertial waves, that's the waves that can cancel out.  But it TAKES high mass acceleration and high gravity to cancel gravity, which is an easy thing to see.

It doesn't quite cancel inertial motion, in the sense that the waveforms cancel, but there is still a lot of physical motion and a huge amount of energy and frequency generated by the engines in motion. Well then there it is! Movement through time, but where a warping effect upon space curvature is neutralized. Why do I even want to learn Special Relativity when the thing that it calculates is phased out to a zero in the warp drive engine?

Whereas time dilation effects are calculated using gravity fields, motion, and space using contemporary mathematics and relativity, then by taking away gravity fields in space, there is no basis for calculations in special relativity at all!

All that can be said is that the terrible time anomaly that "the faster something goes, the slower in time it goes" just goes away without gravity and inertia (motion) involved in space.

That's why special relativity is not in conflict with warp drive physics! There becomes nothing to argue about!

Peace at Last.





Why does a gravity field slow down time according to relativity?  It's because of density. 

Light is the unity. Matter is in paradox to light. Matter comes from light; matter is the paradox of light. Light is the unity. The more dense with mass and thus gravity something becomes, the more it incurs a time frequency -- paradoxical separation from itself.  See "Paradoxes of Unity" on the General Blog page.



The more dense, the more separation in time, the more gravity, the slower things get in time.

The closer to Light, the less dense, the faster things get, the less separation between the paradox of matter.

By neutralizing gravity and mass, we achieve light speed, AND faster time.



That is the Unified Truth. 





....   that's all I can say without making a simple mechanic into something very, very complex. You just need to know that warp drive will work. At this point, an entirely new branch of physics opens up. If we can travel at light speed, without it taking time to cross a distance of space, then that is the objective. The limitations of the machine itself is what makes it a warp drive. Because now, light speed has frequencies.

Because of Alcubierre's equations, we know that negative energy means that the ship's engines will take the pilots beyond a point of zero mass, dipping into negative mass, and then we're dealing with tachyons and time travel far beyond just a mere speed of light, but real travel beyond the speed of light.

I do mention travel through time on the warp drive engineering page. I make the relation negative mass means travel backwards through time, due to light being the "infinity event" in zero time.

Negative mass however does illustrate a speed of travel faster than light, also.

That is another paradox to solve! 

As long as there is forward inertia, there should be forward time (mono-polar vortex). The vertical core introduces a clock, and a point of reference within space (that of gravity). Removing that point of reference from space, if one were to use mass-accelerating engines at the speed of light, the Human mind may not be able to handle the shifting realities, and could end up going somewhere else than otherwise intended! That is why Ascension and metaphysics must be understood.  Otherwise, we can safely deal with warp drive physics rather than hyperspace teleportation; although, without a frame of reference in space, travel into negative space and transformation into light, and beyond able to travel to any point in space at once is a reality. But instead of opening that reality up, we can safely introduce a vertical engine core, knowing that teleportation exists at the zero point, and so there will be elements of teleportation involved regardless.

​The vertical core as a mono-pole inertial vortex also keeps it going forward in time (in polarity, and in one way) -- keeping it tied to space and moving at a much higher frequency THROUGH space resultingly. If there were no polarity, there would be no space. We don't want to disconnect the ship from space because then ONLY the focus of the pilot's mind would determine the reality of where the ship manifests (arrives) in parallel time to its destination. By design, the vertical core can be disengaged, however, while the outer ring runs in isolation or in tandem with the X-1 lower engine . . .

A beam ship is the way the ship moves, making teleporting hops (hyperspace), because we are not going to be doing a repeat of the Philadelphia experiment!
​
This is why some light-based metaphysics is important. 

..........................



The ship will travel faster than light speed using an outer ring drive. At negative frequency and negative energy as seem with light as the zero (the Y axis), with forward inertia in space (regarding the inclusion of an inertial / gravitational vertical core), then there can be travel faster than what the normal frequencies of spacetime allows for, traveling faster in time to cover a distance that is anchored to the ship through the vertical core. Without the vertical core, the ship would leave spacetime altogether beyond any common frame of reference we would have for it.

There is absolutely no linear way to view this, such as A does not lead to B does not lead to C, then D, then E, in a ordering of continuity. 

Time is non-causal according to quantum mechanics.

However simply enough, if we can arrive to a distant place before we left (the negative energy value across time), but still have to travel through SPACE to get there, then we are travelling faster than light. 

I don't think we should be concerned with instantaneous travel to a distant location just yet (teleportation), because there are a few paradoxes to consider about that, and I want to stay focused on the physics of hyperspace and warp drive travel (through hyperdimensional time; hyperdimensional fields of light-space).



With this, we now have a warp drive starship, depending on what technology is used in the outer ring drive. If we can't figure out how to accelerate matter at light speed as suggested by "John" of the secret space program (See the Promise Revealed link), then we can figure it out OTC-X1 style, and from THERE then learn how to accelerate matter magneto-electrostatically and superconductively in an exotic state to near-light speeds.

I'd say the physics of WARP DRIVE are 100% right now, but the engineering is about 80%, at this point, best case.

This makes sense to me, but there are as I said, a few paradoxes left to resolve logically between time travel and interstellar teleportation, while maintaining a focus around the engineering capacity required for warp drive. An understanding of common frequency is required to understand how the engines operate, and the engines depend on an understanding of frequency to work (and to be built, knowingly). I am unsure how frequency applies, at this point, in pure light-space.

​That is one of the objectives of metaphysics. 





So ....   To Summarize:


As I'm re-reading this, every time I reach a point where I can easily just wrap it up simply, I expand upon it and expand upon it, not stating the obvious but by building upon the obvious conclusions.

I guess you're supposed to be able to recognize the obvious which is why I wrote it this way. Seems if we could have seen the obvious this whole time we'd have it by now. 

I'm unable to just spell it out, because spelling it out doesn't explain anything. Zero mass, infinite time. That's pretty much it, spelled out. .....      Mass accelerated to infinity, zero time. Event Horizon. 



Inertia is gravity is mass.  (Equivalence)

Bringing one of those values to a zero is Light-Space, or Infinite Time all at Once.

Looking at the proportional relation above,          Zero mass, infinite time : Infinite mass, zero time

When inertia; gravity; mass is brought close to the infinite limit of a zero, time frequency exponentially increases proportionately. 




That is our energy equation of a warp drive. 


When we are dealing with engineering, then an infinite limit of mass is light speed. That is the reason why the frequencies also get high in the vertical core, but instead of allowing a gravity wave to build up to incur a time-dilation problem according to Special Relativity, we take our infinite limit to the other end of the spectrum, instead of bringing mass to a limit of light speed (where it's mass will exponentially increase to prevent it from ever acheiving light speed but it can be so close that it can be calculated AT light speed PRACTICALLY, while still maintaining FORM), we bring mass to a limitation of a zero. In either case, we're still dealing with light -- mass at light speed, or mass at a zero which is simultaneous light (another way to view light speed, but without any time; able to be anywhere and everywhere at once).

This is also why I call it a "Light-Drive."

​Gravity cancellation (zero mass) while yet maintaining a point of view within spacetime as a physical being is important! That's why there's a vertical engine core, and that's why both sides of infinity are used in vortex shape.  

These physics can operate within a scope of magneto-electrostatic resonance frequencies to do the engineering job without having to accelerate mass to light speed, but while working with the electromagnetic energies of mass and inertia and gravity, itself, in resonance, basically meaning that a slower speed will achieve a higher energy of acceleration. 

That engineering requires its own type of physics, but it all unifies around light (magneto-electrostatic Equivalence).

These images show the frequencies of space measured by light:  that of time.

It takes less time to traverse distance in deep space because there is less space away from gravitational fields, those fields generated by mass. 

The warp drive (or hyperdrive; light-drive) makes use of this paradox in order to operate. Obviously the universe looks backwards because it looks like there is much more space between stars, then there are surrounding stars.

This is where we get into concepts in physics called negative space and positive space, etc.

Relativity claims time is faster in deep space away from gravitational fields. However, it says nothing about frequency, and assumes frequency is always the same wherever one is, in the universe. As you can see in the picture on the left, there is more distance to travel closer to gravity, and so it takes longer in time. From outside the star system looking in toward the planets, it would appear that the planets are moving slower in time according to General Relativity. 

According to the picture on the right, it would appear to take MORE time to traverse space closer to gravity fields, because there is more space to traverse. These are not contradictions, but the geometry itself of the paradox of space and time.  The relation of space and time is intimate however. As space changes, so does time. That ALSO means that the speed of light ALSO MUST CHANGE, because light measures space and time FREQUENCY. Traveling through TIME is the objective of the warp drive, which warps space so it takes less time to traverse great distances. Also, the nature of the warp drive, which is more like a hyperdrive in these physics (there are subtle differences), works with the frequencies of space and time itself, which can travel independently of normal spacetime.

These physics explain that difference and unity, and goes into excruciating detail.  



It takes MORE time to travel distance in space, RELATIVELY speaking. General Relativity does not reach the same conclusion. If it takes more time to travel distance in space, then it takes less time closer to gravity traveling in a gravitationally contracted space. General Relativity DOES claim that there are more intervals of time closer to gravity but this is because time is faster specifically! Time only appears to be slow because there are many more seconds in between!  Time literally slows down in deep space and speeds up, closer to gravity.

General Relativity claims that time slows down closer to gravity. That is in error. 

A warp drive shrinks the distance to travel in space due to a higher frequency in time. VERY simplified. It also has an effect in time. If we are able to witness a higher frequency of spacetime, we would be able to witness something with a faster motion in time, moving faster in time. 

Light is independent of time because it has no mass. If the sunlight just above a forest canopy casts shadows that all point back to the sun, but can be measured in lower Euclidean dimensions to appear as the light source is JUST over the forest canopy (instead of 93 million miles away), then we ought to be able to observe the light of that higher frequency of spacetime from a lower frequency (in deep space), and observe faster motion in time. 

The paradox of frequency is that deep space can be at higher frequency because matter and mass and gravitation moves more and more slower than the speed of light, the bigger it gets. Oppositely, at higher frequency of mass and inertia, there is faster time, and there is more space. When there is less space, time should speed up however because there is less density. Closer to light there should be less mass and faster time because light is without mass and thus simultaneous in time. All these instances are true and are equal, and yet can be opposite of the other points, which is in paradox for example if someone were at each point of a pyramid, then things would look different compared to where each person stands.

The assumption that time speeds up or slows down is also perceived in different ways, and can be explained differently, using either geometry or wave frequency to illustrate. I think it is incorrect to observe that the faster something goes, the slower it travels however, as General Relativity concludes. Relative acceleration and deceleration tends to clarify that conclusion of General Relativity. 

And if we can see that there is less space to travel in deep space, then we can look at that space as higher frequency space (less density; less paradox of separation; time separates), because if there is less space to travel, it should take less time ESPECIALLY if you could adjust your own time frequency to make the journey, which is what all of this is about.



The secret is not to use inertial acceleration of mass to generate a higher gravity field which increases the frequency of time, because that also increases mass density and will compress space (increasing space; making a larger paradox than unifying the paradox). That does have application however. But, the use of inertial acceleration can be two 180 degree wave phases moving in opposite direction, equal and opposite, which reduces the frequency of space while increasing the frequency of time. 

General Relativity is inadequate to explain such principles and mechanics.



General (and Special) Relativity now serves as an example only, and is no longer able to explain the truth of the universe but only within local frames of frequency, which is not the case when determining the motion of black holes which incurs a much greater frequency difference in time and space.  Relativity changes as soon as you turn on the starship engines, also (after all, it's all relative, and in paradox). 



~.. ~ . ~ . 



I realize this is a unique way to look at the universe and it may give people trouble depending on how well versed they are with university-taught physics. But if people are going to let special relativity stop them cold in their tracks with an assumption that faster than light travel is practically impossible, then that's the end. Special relativity deals with objects like rockets and protons hurdling through space, and does NOT deal with fields of energy which change the dynamics of space and time, or starship engines flying through space. 

It cannot be logically claimed that warp drive is impossible due to special relativity's take on rocks or billiard balls in motion. The ongoing paradox INVARIABLY depends upon your point of view. I've tried real hard but have found no case of an absolute static object-based universe. The universe is fluid, and matter is energy and light, in the form of a paradox and multi-paradoxes.

Frequency itself behaves in opposite ways. For example you can have a high frequency of very dense mass, or a very high frequency of very little mass, both with equal force. If you consider that frequency relates with time, then you can work "empty" scalar space with dense mass-space together integrated all as light, and co-direct force with one common directed path.

​With two opposites, X and Y, there is one common unity -- the radius of the whole, the circle of the two, as one. (See: General Blog, "Paradoxes of Unity" for a better grasp on the mechanics of the paradox itself)


​


There have been instances where Bob Lazar's gravity tube out of Area 51 was reported to freeze time in a gravity engine. Making time still inside the gravity field, rather than speeding it up. But when that field is shut down, time reverted back to it's NORMAL conditions without an event horizon that appears that everything is frozen in time on the inside of the event horizon. 

To be fair General and Special Relativity confirms that reality. Yet the red-shifting of distant star systems demonstrates the stretching of space into a longer wave due to the contraction of space closer in the star system due to gravity which stretches the space at the edges. This also explains a relative "speedbump" aspect near the edges of an "event horizon." (Note: the stars are visually blue-shifted to the naked eye though, to everything outside our star-system's gravity field, just thought I'd mention)

If spacetime can be stretched, it can be contracted. The condensing of electrical space is also a close cousin of capacitance, as electrical condensers were used 100 years ago in Tesla's time.

This is about the best way to explain warp drives though, by NOT using General and Special Relativity but only for example. Seeing how space moves is a better way in my opinion, because GR and SR also are only concerned with what happens outside the event horizons of inner universal events (object-based, instead of frequency-based).

Examining pure frequency and energy, we see that the universe behaves very differently. I'm concerned about the "whys" of this, but I'm more focused on the inception of warp drives than stabbing myself in my foot over it over, and over.  If I can explain how a technology can work, and demonstrate aspects that provides further evidence to it working, even though the physics may be radically different than the usual, then at least there is a basis to take it seriously, and to allow oneself to believe that "yes, it could work."




IF INDEED Gravity does separate mass from a pure higher frequency of light further and further, incurring a longer time wave, as GR and SR suggests (light being the unity of matter and mass, without mass and without time), then GR and SR show that light is unity of time and space, and also implies that the gravity-cancellation engine will increase the ship's frequency in time. 

Regardless, the charts above would be correct in that situation in regards to unified motion of the starship's engines (using the OTC-X1 as the foundation for this). It explains why a black hole must get massive with fast spin, to maintain equilibrium with the rest of the inertial universe.  

It doesn't mean the pictures above are wrong. It means that General and Special Relativity are based around Light Unity, rather than gravitational frequency. Yet and also, if light measures the frequency of time, then we could very well BE backwards with General and Special Relativity. Light should be assumed not to have a speed at all! Mass is what has the speed, the speed of space in gravitational and massive field conditions as Einstein theorized, while time is the speed, the frequency of mass and gravitational information to move from mass to mass -- thus showing the separated universe from pure light; the living paradox of space and time as a universe of energy where there is universal Action not seen as objects (when the ego divorces self from all action and perceives an objective reality of identity and sub-identity instead of fields of energy and Cosmic water and sound and light).  


​
Simultaneous space is Light Space, which is pure unity, and multi-dimensionality, entire fields of time simultaneously in motion, where there is no time in the rest of Existence but only in our little realm we call the "universe."


​
When we can compress space, then we can create a focus, a "compact" of energy and form, which would ALSO LOOK THE SAME as expanding space around a ship, which would STILL shrink it down to a little ball. 
​


​It just makes more sense to show how frequency increases in compressed space, because that's how electricity works, and we're gonna be using electricity to warp time and space obviously, unless we'd rather learn about using pure sound and intention on granite or something.

There can be no model which shows how space and time expand infinitely to achieve light unification that the ego-identity-conscious mind can grasp and relate with. It has to be drawn on paper. It has to fit into a machine. The universe may be able to expand spacetime to make galaxies move, but the human being is small and tiny and is a singular point of view than a universe-all-points-of-view. The Human has to build a little thing and make the universe work in reverse according to him/her. It's easier to contract space to work with the universe in expanded ways than to expand space and work universally upon a smaller space.




The Conclusion:

Also to simplify all that mess below in the other posts, if you can compress space where there is an imbalance then you can expand space at the edges and/or midpoint between normal space and contracted space, so that time slows to a crawl.  That's the Event Horizon. What is inside the Event Horizon is where GR and SR cannot go. I've had huge issues with GR and SR as I'm sure others have, too. But if I just bypass GR and SR without addressing it, then that's irresponsible. The only thing that can truly be done is to integrate GR and SR with models of paradoxes of frequency, and see what truth results, and just take it from there, which does even MORE to explain how the universe works. Time slows to a crawl near an Event Horizon, and we can see how that works due to gravitationally contracted space, which inflates space paradoxically (literally "expansion within").

Literally, every star system is a realm where space is created and expanded around those stars. There is very little actual space between stars in deeper space. There is the illusion of it, but that's the entire nature of the paradox. GR and SR perform calculations on the illusion of space only. Why are black holes so massive? It's because that's the event horizon we see around near-infinitely contracted space, there could be entire light-years to travel actually ever before a pilot reaches the actual singularity or black hole star itself, once passing through the event horizon, to illustrate.

It makes perfect sense and does NOT contradict General and Special Relativity. If anything, because of GR and SR we now have to look at the inflation of space very differently. I could also assume that no one has truly understood General and Special Relativity until the advent of warp drive physics.

​In fact in Bob Lazar's account of turning on the ET gravity engine and observing a burning candle inside the field, after the field was switched off it was shown that the candle had burned all the way out and had melted on the table. That DOES provide an account supporting evidence of a faster time frequency within an Event Horizon. Bob Lazar never mentioned any testing of that aspect of time however, or has told the public any results confirming the existence of a faster flow of time within a gravity field, specifically (he hinted at something, though).

In the case of gravity cancellation, according to special relativity the frequencies of time increase. See: Warp Drive Engineering under the section "LAU-X3 Dragon Eye."


​