Here is a bit of a proof of concept for the air space employed in the LAU-X4, using very low pressure air or gas, to form a plasma.  Also, it covers dielectric solids for use in electro-gravity experiments, showing a gravity pocket forms above the plasma.

https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701091.pdf

The only difference is that this uses ELF (extremely low frequency) dielectric charge plates conducting current or a charge field at ELF radio wave transmission and reception (wireless beaming).  ELF radio wave transmission is the result of the charged plates, and is also reminiscent of usage of radio waves to excite salt water, causing the salt water to combust, as per an article lower down on this page.

The material plasma is also electrified from standard house current, and then the ELF electric field is applied to it.  One thing I've learned is that two systems must have energy for overall dynamic systems to work correctly, instead of just one system applying charge to both.

The LAU-X4 uses high frequency, but in similar arrangements, so the pdf is worth a look; and it shows that the system can maintain its own air-space, and work in a vacuum, "packing its own air with it."

These are not new concepts at all.  This website discusses these concepts in great detail.  The only difference is the use of ELF, but also it shows a few clear mechanisms, schematics, and mathematical theory.  In fact, further into the article, it DOES discuss experiments that DO use high frequency energy to also achieve gravitation fields.





This paper shows electrostatic lifter technology can work in a vacuum, so as long as its air is contained within it's own space, in an air-tight container.

This paper shows relationship with Biefeld-Brown, or Townsend Brown similarities using dielectric mass.

Using ELF however seems to me to be an inefficient use of power systems, because excitation of plasma may occur at various resonance harmonics, whereas ELF is only ONE such resonant harmonic, but harmonics should also exist in higher frequencies, where energy production in a spacecraft can be much more efficient and compact when using negative energy generating overunity.

This paper also shows that these results cannot be understood in a framework of General Relativity.  Also, this paper shows some relations concerning virtual graviphotons.  There is no speed limit for virtual photons.  However, as shown by Eric Dollard, at simultaneous speeds and distance, the scalar and longitudinal aspect of magneto-electrostatic interactions (negative energy) producing photons -- in that energy type, there also can be photons having no speed limit, and an unlimited distance, and able to carry energy over that distance -- as well as having a much higher energy output -- as in phenomenally higher energy output, of which virtual particles do not have a phenomenally high energy output.



As stated, this is nothing really new to what we have already known, discussed on this website.  These results of gravitation are slight, but showing within a gram or so weight reduction in some cases, and higher and lower in other cases, even upwards of several grams.  This adds further validation to the LAU-X4 spacecraft, and the OTC-X1.

This paper also shows that the inertial properties of a spacecraft can be reduced (inertial cancellation, ultimately).


However, this paper does not show usage of negative energy characteristics; although does discuss virtual particles -- photons and graviphotons as sources of simultaneous information transmission at any distance with no speed limit, and energy is exchanged.  This would serve more as a quantumly entangled source of hyperspace communication (something that I had discussed on the warp drive news page, but was so incidental that I think I deleted it).  Now, there is an actual mechanism for this communication system.

I still think that the approaches of generating negative energy with very high energy output shown on this website is a better approach to generating gravity fields, inertial cancellation fields, and time-warp fields, also which General Relativity cannot be used to describe and understand these mechanisms.


Finally, this paper also shows the same things about Newtonian physics that I have also brought up, that not only does Newtonian physics NOT include any concept of gravity waves (which have been discovered by science, and is currently accepted as existing), BUT ALSO, the concept of mass in Newtonian physics is a thing that never changes, whereas in General Relativity (Einsteinan physics), mass is known to change, along with time, which are things that Newtonian physics cannot describe, and such things cannot be understood through Newtonian physics.  Inertial and gravity cancellation also cannot be understood through Newtonian physics.

We're at a point now where we have surpassed Newtonian and Einsteinean physics altogether.  General and Special Relativity does not even touch these new realities of mass reduction and gravity cancellation; although Relativity however does allow for changes of mass and changes of gravitation, and changes of temporal frequency.

But as evident as the miles of text below in these Relativity articles, no solution is easily found in that framework of General and Special Relativity, because as we have exceeded the speed of light to a considerable degree using waveforms and energy; and with mass reduction using negative energy, General and Special Relativity will continue to be violated, as it is not able to go past a certain point, the more we understand about warp drive.  I am pleased to see that more physicists are in agreement there.

I hate to use the term, "violated," because that implies that there is something that exists that upholds absolute reality, whereas upon violation, there is violation upon absolute reality instead of merely accepting an evolution and furthering understanding of a process of science.


And too, overunity and reactionless free energy is now shown to exist, and has been proven.  Such pages as the Free Energy / Tesla page of this website do show this proof.  

Because of that, and the above, our physics are now changed, and many outdated laws of physics are now null and void.  Energy CAN be created as our physics and current levels of technology in the public, do show.

It must be repeatedly said, that the electret is the electrostatic equivalent of the magnet, and that an electret can create electrical current for hundreds of years at least (if well constructed) which is reactionless, and yet where does the mass come from since electrons are shown to have mass?  So this basic simple concept is the simple concept of the creation of mass; and as a di-electric material, has unique properties and value in the realm of experimental gravitational propulsion.



. . .



....  Also, THIS is rather noteworthy:

http://www.free-energy-info.com/Issue15.pdf

​This was published in 2004, but discusses everything here at this website.  Some things predominantly noteworthy are the things that the search engine results are calling "pseudoscience" is really the same things postulated and revealed by some rather famous Ph.D. holders in physics.  So, NOT pseudoscience, thank you very much.  

This pdf is actually a culmination of everything antigravity and energy related as a pretty massive resource that further validates everything.  at.  this.  website.

I've actually run across some of this stuff on this pdf article before.  It includes every piece of physics required to reproduce the OTC-X1, and even going beyond that.  Such things included are the nature of macro-quantum spin torsion fields (fields generated by spinning mass, gravitational in nature; also including spirals and flat disks), vacuum mechanics, CSE (cavity structural effect; I forget what the acronym stands for; resonance cavity-based gravity/antigravity), an early version of the EM drive using microwave impulse, Townsend Brown asymmetrical capacitor systems, elimination of electrostatic drag (not quite the same thing as the "Lenz Buster" in the MVP pulse motor), the homopolar dynamo, and other stuff.

Here's a quote from the first article in the pdf:

"For 20 years, torsion fields and torsion generators have been widely used to create torsion energy sourc
es, torsion transport, torsion metallurgy, torsion sys
tems of data transfer communication, torsion sys
tems of medical diagnostics, etc. [10]. The feasibili
ty and practical effectiveness of torsion fields has been experimentally proved in a number of areas of application. In some fields, that use torsion technol
ogies (such as nuclear waste processing), a scientific foundation has been laid and preliminary experimen
tal results have been achieved. Technological expe
rience has been gained in some areas."


​So it seems that "torsion fields" are not pseudoscience, at all, as per the common search engine results will tell you!!  This has got me rather mad, in fact that valid science in use today in MANY technological capacities (torsion = vortex) is verifying and validating torsion fields, when everything you read on the Google search engine pops out articles saying it's "crackpot pseudoscience" upon doing a search to learn what "torsion fields" are!!!  

This actually pisses me off that the Google search engine results are obviously and purposefully skewed!   Is there an obvious relation between magneto-electrostatic torsion fields, and gravity fields??   If, as per Ed Leedskalnin's experiments showed, that electromagnetism interacts at right angles to the plane of a gravity field, then why can't a gravity field also be created by electromagnetic fields?  Well they can, as the top pdf shows!  

Now we come along and introduce spin, which is a force of acceleration geometrically, in a resonance cavity (the hull of the craft), and we could very well be looking at a gravitational engine in the OTC-X1.


​

UPDATED  9/1/2017

I have been so very stubborn and perhaps a little on the wishful thinking about all this ..   It's taken me a long time to sort this out.  The updates and design improvement page, the article titled, "Physics Update:  How Time Works, Mostly"  has the correct account..   whereas this blog page has largely been attempting to attain a correct account, and I've made many mistakes along the way.





The LIGO observatory (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory) detected and measured the gravity waves from two black holes spinning down to collision, just like Einstein was working on with his relativity math, it even made a sound.

This is really cool!  Conventionally, like in the movie "Interstellar," it is thought that time slows way down near a strong gravity source like a black hole.  But, what LIGO measured was very different.  LIGO detected the time waves from two rapidly spinning black holes. Time sped up a little, then slowed down a little, then sped up, and this is a wave.  Time waves, rather than gravity waves. 

But, it didn't take a thousand years to gradually detect that time sped up a little, and then a thousand years to detect time slowed down a little, according to what conventional Relativity would have us believe.

It shows a few things:  Gravity cancellation speeds up time.  Gravity can be beamed when you line up gravity-sources.  Time speeds up closer to gravity in the condition of rapidly rotating and moving gravity sources. 

So when you get a gravity source moving rapidly across space, spinning and rotating perhaps, essentially time normalizes with motion of gravity fields.

As a note:  We can say gravity is just a byproduct of alignments of electromagnetism and inertia and mass, or we can just say that "something gravitates" rather than a mouthful.   We can say time really has no axis, there really is no time, or whatever, but it's easier to just say "time waves were detected."  

I don't want to get too overly complex with this.  We saw an engine working -- two black holes in rapid motion around each other -- that's an engine.  It shows you can use massive gravity to speed up time, not to be limited by what Special Relativity claims, that the faster something travels, the slower it actually goes [in time] (which is so lame and ludicrous).




I want to expand upon this.  LIGO detected two rapidly spinning black holes, spinning down into collision. 

That is an engine. It creates waves, like a wave generator.  That action creates spinning gravity waves, higher and lower -- with frequency.   You may could imagine how ocean waves are simulated in a wave tank of water at an amusement water-slide park, for instance. 

Relativity typically claims that time slows way down near a black hole, so that if someone were there, at the black hole, one day for him would be equivalent to thousands of years on Earth.

So, time waves couldn't have been so rapidly detected, unless time sped up, the closer the black holes approached each other in motion.




This is what makes Warp Drive possible -- using a gravity engine in vortex geometry.  See the top of the Warp Drive News page for what this means practically for a pilot flying in a starship, and for outside observers.


Note:  it's "LIGO" for Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory.  I misspelled it in the comments.  OOPS.         It's all over the news and internet so..  it's an easy thing to look up for your own research and verification.




Einstein got pretty close, also showing inertial fields are acceleration fields, and that is what gravity actually is. When you base matter around Light unity, then you get into quantum waves; probability waves of zero energy. No mass = no time. Rather, probable fields of infinite time. Light-space.

The universe is Light, but as a paradox of positive and negative, electric and magnetic, scalar in nature (static), but also part of the substance of the universe itself is also Mind. Consciousness.

It's harder to detect the gravity waves from our Sun, because it's not really moving around much. I'm impressed that we actually detected TIME WAVES, not so much gravity waves. 


​

Also, I want to point out something about the GPS geo-stationary satellites around Earth.  They are observed to have a right-angled gravity cancellation effect going on with them.  It could merely be that they are far away from Earth gravity, that their clocks run faster.  Geo-stationary satellites are the only satellites where their clocks do run faster, instead of slower as all the near-Earth orbiting satellites and space stations.

Since they are counter-acting the pull of Earth gravity by holding a distance above Earth and travelling in an orbit which holds them directly in one position over Earth, then this is a peculiar geometry.  Most satellites travel very rapidly around Earth, and accordingly their clocks run slower than on Earth surface, which coincides with Special Relativity, in that their acceleration puts them in a higher frame of inertia, which equates to a higher force of gravitation since acceleration equates to gravitation, according to Einstein and has been tested and confirmed many times over the years.  Thus, a higher frame of acceleration (rotation around Earth, in a circle) will incur a time penalty as our particle accelerator experiments have shown.

Geo-synchronous satellites do adjust for a faster time frequency to relay information back to Earth.  The only question is, while they are in motion, they are in a static location relative to Earth, and their clock rates are faster, just the same as elevation above Earth would also change the clock rate, even though as Earth spins.

Some GPS satellite spokespersons refute the claim that the satellites' clocks do run faster.  However, the satellites DO run at a faster clock rate, according to the majority of GPS satellite manufacturers.  

It would take LIGO to refute their claim of discovering gravity and time waves, and they would have to say that they did not in fact detect two black holes spinning down to collision, in order for this gravity cancellation proof to be countered.  Otherwise, this is heavy-duty proof in mainstream, that gravity cancellation mechanics really do increase time frequency, to an extraordinary level.  

It actually is fairly common-sense however at this point, since we've had time to gel on it for a while, that gravity cancellation requires at least two massive bodies in rotation (acceleration), or at least two magneto-electrostatic di-electric generators (electromagnetic equivalency to gravitation and mass), for gravity cancellation and thus mass reduction to incur a faster temporal frequency that would allow a ship to travel faster than its inertial frequency would allow it, which equates to a ship beating the speed of light as a speed limit.  Negative energy is also a factor, and that will be brought up below.







I do this work in my sleep, too. Literally. ... I keep checking and re-checking myself daily to make sure everything is correct. I have found a few absolute truths, which are defined ONLY in an engine, and how the engine works. But otherwise, Relativity is not absolute, by its very name "Relative."

There are a few things to look at with this proof.
​

UPDATED:




A) Time speeds up closer to gravity -- contradiction to modern relativity, but it must be said that is the case
     GENERALLY, relative to frequency.   ???

*  I have to make a note about this.  I've been incorrect (9/1/17).  Time slows down close to gravity to enact a balance, preventing matter from travelling faster than light, whereas light is our "meter stick and clock" to measure space and time-frequency.  Two spinning gravitational masses can cancel the gravity waves, so that the rotating gravitational engine system speeds up time.  This would have to accompany a mass reduction to achieve this, relatively.  So the more true thing to say is that gravity cancellation speeds up time.  

If two massive black holes can negate their time dilation, then everything changes.  Rotation enables a frequency of a wave motion to be achieved.  

If considering mass as waves, gravity waves and frequency, then when the energy of mass (electromagnetism, created by mass) becomes negative, then suddenly all these physics now work, according to Alcubierre, and Tesla.



B) Gravity cancellation speeds up time.   ...   It can also be said that negative gravity is therefore negative energy (at least a form of negative energy).



C) Gravity which makes time stand still and hardly "flowing" at all means that we can move across the vast
    distance between stars very rapidly, taking very little time at all! (paradoxical; motion of a gravity source
    through space)



D) The motion of two gravity sources spinning and rotating (acceleration) around each other, speeds up time, or rather negates the time dilation of slower time.



I don't know why I've been so stubborn about this, well actually I do..  It's because of negative energy frequency.   In negative energy frequency conditions, then time would speed up closer to gravity, and it could be said increasing frequency will increase the speed of time.  That is with negative energy conditions however, where the collapse of mass (which is the collapse of electromagnetic density, if you consider mass as a type of electromagnetic field) is involved.

Otherwise, conventionally as spacetime frequencies increase, time slows down!  The only solution is as Alcubierre has stated in his warp drive metrics, is that negative energy MUST be the energy type to make warp drive work.

​

The reason why this works, is that the unity of matter is light.  As light moves into paradoxical density (mass), creating mass, matter, space, and time, then the more mass relates to an increasing density of time, of separation from moment to moment, making time slower instead of faster.  Light has zero time, simultaneous.  Less mass is a bit closer to a faster simultaneous time.  More mass would therefore increase the separation of matter from a light-type form of zero mass and therefore zero time, which means:  more mass incurs more time.  

This ALSO means that "more" time means more separation from zero-light, into densities of spacetime;  making more time.   So more time is slower time frequency.

Less time, ultimately becoming no time, is the ever increasing speed of time frequency, which is when the paradoxical form of matter (positive and negative, electric and magnetic, etc) incurs less separation from a light-like reality.

More mass = more time, which is the increased separation of the paradox of spacetime from a zero point of light-time (simultaneous).  That gives time reality.  That makes time.  Time IS the separation between paradoxical events to achieve a unity event of light.

​Make sense?  Good.


Time speeding up approaching a gravity source is an error;  however, time DOES speed up approaching the zero point of a gravity source, where the mass of an object is cancelled in the center, at the zero point.  I haven't been clear about this.  If you consider the mass of a star, then at the center of a star, all the mass surrounding the zero point center of the star pulls equally in all directions, cancelling gravity in the center, which is where a singularity point of zero time can exist.  The singularity of zero time is a point of infinite time, not that time stands still frozen, but that all time exists all at once, and the infinite past and infinite future all converge and happens all at once.

This was one of the issues I've had with conventional relativity for some time now.  This should all be much more clear, now, after this "cipher" has been established.

A gravity source would be the zero point, which is the source of time and space and electromagnetism.  However, it is mass which DIRECTLY creates gravity as gravity's source.  So the "Source" of gravity would therefore be the source of mass.  And in that sense, then yes.  Time does speed up as one approaches the source of gravity AND mass.


On this proof, it can be claimed that negative energy is technically the source of all energy and mass in the universe.... the zero point of infinite potential of energy.  

​
Simply stated, using our rotating mercury-plasma di-electric utrons, giving them power and inertial frequency translates into an increase of mass which in gravity-cancellation geometry will give a small craft a greater force of time-dilation, or accelerated time frequency (using negative energy) other than what its rest-mass allows for.  The vertical impeller, or core, allows the negative energy itself to directly translate into a creation-force of antigravitational (negative gravity) inertia (impulse).  This can also get into a concept of negative inertia, as well.

Negative inertial fields wouldn't resist acceleration but would flow with acceleration.  Instead of an opposing force that resists motion, g-forces wouldn't be felt by a pilot, in a negative inertial field.  
​​



All this involves physics though...   Not necessarily energy and intention, nor consciousness.  It is a mystery how psychic teleportation actually works, other than one's energy density must become light-like, which must involve the biological usage of negative energy, directed by mind.  This borders on Ascension, to be able to achieve such a thing, which it is reported that such a thing can be achieved, and the Air Force and Chinese have been working on psychic teleportation, also that has been rumored / reported.

In that case, it can simply be stated increasing one's frequency will increase one's vibration closer to a light-body type of reality.  However this must involve negative energy, which IS the natural and abundant form of energy in the universe.

In fact, our bodies are radiant systems, electrostatic systems, and use negative energy freely throughout the body, just as the Earth's surface can be tapped to be used in negative energy technology systems like the Tesla tower Ley-line negative energy power production system, recently being discussed at this website.

​



Also see:  http://www.warp-drive-physics.com/warp-drive-blog/teslas-theory-of-electromagnetic-gravity


Tesla's theory of electromagnetic gravity ..  I used an old blank draft that was back-dated without realizing that the time-stamp would place it way farther down the page, instead of right up top.  It doesn't really say much, but does emphasize invention over scholastics, and back-engineering over theory.  It contains several links to bring one up to par with what is commonly known about electromagnetic gravity and electromagnetic mass, but there is no real conclusion made other than what's already in places around this website.  It does show that there truly does exist a relation between mass, gravity, and electromagnetism, enough to claim that electromagnetism is the basis of all fundamental forces in the universe.  

It also emphasizes one specific thing:  the dire need to reverse-engineer and duplicate and build the OTC-X1, which is truly a gift to all of Earth Humanity.  It's inspiring.  

Also, it tends to show that David Hamel's approach of using the big granite sphere spinning rapidly does not work.  It would be more real if there were two spinning granite spheres around each other, rather than just one.  That has been phased out, regardless in favor of the OTC-X1 platform.
​



​
​

This is the latest mechanism to explain how a higher temporal frequency can exist to the ship and to the pilots without incurring a higher gravitational field which according to Special Relativity would slow that time frequency down, relatively to someone standing outside the gravitational field.

Putting it that way, I don't see the issue. But, there may be an issue when dealing with our standard calculations and mathematics. I say that the time frequency field compresses, lengthening the time frequency wave to slow time to a crawl near an event horizon (it doesn't have to be an event horizon from a black hole, but should serve to illustrate gravity-space compression from weaker gravity fields, and the time dilation.

When space compresses, the time frequency compresses. Now, what if space didn't compress, but the time frequency speeds up; would that create an event horizon and yet incur the time dilation issue from special relativity?

We WANT the time frequency to compress, to get faster, so that the ship moves in a field of faster time relative to the outside universe, NOT slower time!  But when that happens under conditions of gravitation, we get a spacetime warp which is backwards. By cancelling out the inertial gravity field which generates very high mass, how can it be shown that the frequency of time remains very high?

That is a complex issue. But that right there is the simple solution. It has everything to do with frequency though, NOT relativity.

What is time?  Time is not a thing of its own. Time has no axis. It's a thing of frequency, of the motion of space. Space has an axis. Light should be the Y axis, because at zero time (light), space is undefined.

Time is "moved" because space is moved.

When space is compressed under gravity, time frequency is higher, but outside that gravity field is a red shift, which tells us frequency (of space, seen as time) is lower surrounding the field of gravity, because of the compression explained in the blog article below this one. 

The only difference, since gravity is inertia according to Einstein and relativity, we want to keep the time frequency high so we move very very very fast. Otherwise under gravitation the faster something moves, the slower it goes in time. We want to go fast in time, which reduces the distance of space, which is opposite of relativity.

We want to reduce our inertia (mass) also. By reducing the inertia, then it won't pile up and build up so high, and we can travel fast in time without dragging behind with an overloaded inertia.

It's just that simple, though. It shouldn't be considered "Gravity cancellation," but "Inertial cancellation."

Well that makes even MORE sense! 

That is the whole solution, the whole effect, the whole aspect of a warp drive, is achieving the conditions of inertial cancellation which also raises the time frequency. Pilots wouldn't feel acceleration forces if there is no inertia. 


The simple solution is that mass is lowered, thus lowering gravity (cancelling inertia), but the time frequency increases. 

I don't think special relativity can make such calculations or provide a mathematical proof, because it's too much like using special relativity to cram a square peg into a round hole. Even though I claimed special relativity is no longer in conflict, but it's really the model of physics depicted by special relativity that is no longer in conflict.

This is the mechanism I've been talking about all this time at this website, but "Cancelling Inertia" is perhaps the BEST way to look at this approach of warp drive mechanics. 

There are two models which shows increased frequencies -- in the presence of high gravitational compression, and in the presence of very little gravity at all (light as the unity of frequency; in layman's terms, the highest frequency possible, and that is also according to the metaphysics). Cancelling inertia should very well increase frequency, but only when there is something of a frequency to work with!

In any case, according to Otis T. Carr, this is the whole basis for what the OTC-X1 does.

Since there are two ways to look at frequency, being higher in conditions of extreme gravitation and in conditions of very little mass (because light is the Y axis, not time), then what we have is a win-win situation. 

It does not matter why gravity does what it does to time. THERE IS NO TIME.  We're not even DEALING with gravity, we're dealing with FREQUENCY (quantum gravity -- waves).

All that matters is that we know that gravity does something to time thanks to Special Relativity.

We can't necessarily look at curved space to find a solution, but must look at frequencies of inertial space.

So this is a new type of physics, a brand new model, but it's really not. It's a model built on contemporary physics!  But we're now at the point to have to develop a new form of mathematics built around light-based unity in order to explain what we've known for 100 years. 

It has been that issue in mathematics, treating time as having an axis, which has prevented these realizations from ever happening. More of this is explained in the post below, and in the "LAU-X3 Dragon Eye" section on the warp drive engineering page.

THAT RIGHT THERE is the reason why it has taken pages and pages, and a comprehensive website to explain something so simple to where it can be believed.

I like the inertial / gravity cancellation model because it shows that it takes a high frequency of mass acceleration near light speeds to cancel the effects of lower Earth gravity, and to cancel the effects of the gravitational field in the solar system created by the sun (which is not a black hole and so it's gravitational inertia is not going to be accelerated nearly as fast as an engine capable of accelerating protons to near light speed. Electrons already do travel at light speed. That's something we can work with, also).

High frequency mass acceleration creates a wave, so that a counter-spinning wave can create two waveforms that cancel when 180 degrees out of phase. Gravity waves, inertial waves, that's the waves that can cancel out.  But it TAKES high mass acceleration and high gravity to cancel gravity, which is an easy thing to see.

It doesn't quite cancel inertial motion, in the sense that the waveforms cancel, but there is still a lot of physical motion and a huge amount of energy and frequency generated by the engines in motion. Well then there it is! Movement through time, but where a warping effect upon space curvature is neutralized. Why do I even want to learn Special Relativity when the thing that it calculates is phased out to a zero in the warp drive engine?

Whereas time dilation effects are calculated using gravity fields, motion, and space using contemporary mathematics and relativity, then by taking away gravity fields in space, there is no basis for calculations in special relativity at all!

All that can be said is that the terrible time anomaly that "the faster something goes, the slower in time it goes" just goes away without gravity and inertia (motion) involved in space.

That's why special relativity is not in conflict with warp drive physics! There becomes nothing to argue about!

Peace at Last.





Why does a gravity field slow down time according to relativity?  It's because of density. 

Light is the unity. Matter is in paradox to light. Matter comes from light; matter is the paradox of light. Light is the unity. The more dense with mass and thus gravity something becomes, the more it incurs a time frequency -- paradoxical separation from itself.  See "Paradoxes of Unity" on the General Blog page.



The more dense, the more separation in time, the more gravity, the slower things get in time.

The closer to Light, the less dense, the faster things get, the less separation between the paradox of matter.

By neutralizing gravity and mass, we achieve light speed, AND faster time.



That is the Unified Truth. 





....   that's all I can say without making a simple mechanic into something very, very complex. You just need to know that warp drive will work. At this point, an entirely new branch of physics opens up. If we can travel at light speed, without it taking time to cross a distance of space, then that is the objective. The limitations of the machine itself is what makes it a warp drive. Because now, light speed has frequencies.

Because of Alcubierre's equations, we know that negative energy means that the ship's engines will take the pilots beyond a point of zero mass, dipping into negative mass, and then we're dealing with tachyons and time travel far beyond just a mere speed of light, but real travel beyond the speed of light.

I do mention travel through time on the warp drive engineering page. I make the relation negative mass means travel backwards through time, due to light being the "infinity event" in zero time.

Negative mass however does illustrate a speed of travel faster than light, also.

That is another paradox to solve! 

As long as there is forward inertia, there should be forward time (mono-polar vortex). The vertical core introduces a clock, and a point of reference within space (that of gravity). Removing that point of reference from space, if one were to use mass-accelerating engines at the speed of light, the Human mind may not be able to handle the shifting realities, and could end up going somewhere else than otherwise intended! That is why Ascension and metaphysics must be understood.  Otherwise, we can safely deal with warp drive physics rather than hyperspace teleportation; although, without a frame of reference in space, travel into negative space and transformation into light, and beyond able to travel to any point in space at once is a reality. But instead of opening that reality up, we can safely introduce a vertical engine core, knowing that teleportation exists at the zero point, and so there will be elements of teleportation involved regardless.

​The vertical core as a mono-pole inertial vortex also keeps it going forward in time (in polarity, and in one way) -- keeping it tied to space and moving at a much higher frequency THROUGH space resultingly. If there were no polarity, there would be no space. We don't want to disconnect the ship from space because then ONLY the focus of the pilot's mind would determine the reality of where the ship manifests (arrives) in parallel time to its destination. By design, the vertical core can be disengaged, however, while the outer ring runs in isolation or in tandem with the X-1 lower engine . . .

A beam ship is the way the ship moves, making teleporting hops (hyperspace), because we are not going to be doing a repeat of the Philadelphia experiment!
​
This is why some light-based metaphysics is important. 

..........................



The ship will travel faster than light speed using an outer ring drive. At negative frequency and negative energy as seem with light as the zero (the Y axis), with forward inertia in space (regarding the inclusion of an inertial / gravitational vertical core), then there can be travel faster than what the normal frequencies of spacetime allows for, traveling faster in time to cover a distance that is anchored to the ship through the vertical core. Without the vertical core, the ship would leave spacetime altogether beyond any common frame of reference we would have for it.

There is absolutely no linear way to view this, such as A does not lead to B does not lead to C, then D, then E, in a ordering of continuity. 

Time is non-causal according to quantum mechanics.

However simply enough, if we can arrive to a distant place before we left (the negative energy value across time), but still have to travel through SPACE to get there, then we are travelling faster than light. 

I don't think we should be concerned with instantaneous travel to a distant location just yet (teleportation), because there are a few paradoxes to consider about that, and I want to stay focused on the physics of hyperspace and warp drive travel (through hyperdimensional time; hyperdimensional fields of light-space).



With this, we now have a warp drive starship, depending on what technology is used in the outer ring drive. If we can't figure out how to accelerate matter at light speed as suggested by "John" of the secret space program (See the Promise Revealed link), then we can figure it out OTC-X1 style, and from THERE then learn how to accelerate matter magneto-electrostatically and superconductively in an exotic state to near-light speeds.

I'd say the physics of WARP DRIVE are 100% right now, but the engineering is about 80%, at this point, best case.

This makes sense to me, but there are as I said, a few paradoxes left to resolve logically between time travel and interstellar teleportation, while maintaining a focus around the engineering capacity required for warp drive. An understanding of common frequency is required to understand how the engines operate, and the engines depend on an understanding of frequency to work (and to be built, knowingly). I am unsure how frequency applies, at this point, in pure light-space.

​That is one of the objectives of metaphysics. 





So ....   To Summarize:


As I'm re-reading this, every time I reach a point where I can easily just wrap it up simply, I expand upon it and expand upon it, not stating the obvious but by building upon the obvious conclusions.

I guess you're supposed to be able to recognize the obvious which is why I wrote it this way. Seems if we could have seen the obvious this whole time we'd have it by now. 

I'm unable to just spell it out, because spelling it out doesn't explain anything. Zero mass, infinite time. That's pretty much it, spelled out. .....      Mass accelerated to infinity, zero time. Event Horizon. 



Inertia is gravity is mass.  (Equivalence)

Bringing one of those values to a zero is Light-Space, or Infinite Time all at Once.

Looking at the proportional relation above,          Zero mass, infinite time : Infinite mass, zero time

When inertia; gravity; mass is brought close to the infinite limit of a zero, time frequency exponentially increases proportionately. 




That is our energy equation of a warp drive. 


When we are dealing with engineering, then an infinite limit of mass is light speed. That is the reason why the frequencies also get high in the vertical core, but instead of allowing a gravity wave to build up to incur a time-dilation problem according to Special Relativity, we take our infinite limit to the other end of the spectrum, instead of bringing mass to a limit of light speed (where it's mass will exponentially increase to prevent it from ever acheiving light speed but it can be so close that it can be calculated AT light speed PRACTICALLY, while still maintaining FORM), we bring mass to a limitation of a zero. In either case, we're still dealing with light -- mass at light speed, or mass at a zero which is simultaneous light (another way to view light speed, but without any time; able to be anywhere and everywhere at once).

This is also why I call it a "Light-Drive."

​Gravity cancellation (zero mass) while yet maintaining a point of view within spacetime as a physical being is important! That's why there's a vertical engine core, and that's why both sides of infinity are used in vortex shape.  

These physics can operate within a scope of magneto-electrostatic resonance frequencies to do the engineering job without having to accelerate mass to light speed, but while working with the electromagnetic energies of mass and inertia and gravity, itself, in resonance, basically meaning that a slower speed will achieve a higher energy of acceleration. 

That engineering requires its own type of physics, but it all unifies around light (magneto-electrostatic Equivalence).

These images show the frequencies of space measured by light:  that of time.

It takes less time to traverse distance in deep space because there is less space away from gravitational fields, those fields generated by mass. 

The warp drive (or hyperdrive; light-drive) makes use of this paradox in order to operate. Obviously the universe looks backwards because it looks like there is much more space between stars, then there are surrounding stars.

This is where we get into concepts in physics called negative space and positive space, etc.

Relativity claims time is faster in deep space away from gravitational fields. However, it says nothing about frequency, and assumes frequency is always the same wherever one is, in the universe. As you can see in the picture on the left, there is more distance to travel closer to gravity, and so it takes longer in time. From outside the star system looking in toward the planets, it would appear that the planets are moving slower in time according to General Relativity. 

According to the picture on the right, it would appear to take MORE time to traverse space closer to gravity fields, because there is more space to traverse. These are not contradictions, but the geometry itself of the paradox of space and time.  The relation of space and time is intimate however. As space changes, so does time. That ALSO means that the speed of light ALSO MUST CHANGE, because light measures space and time FREQUENCY. Traveling through TIME is the objective of the warp drive, which warps space so it takes less time to traverse great distances. Also, the nature of the warp drive, which is more like a hyperdrive in these physics (there are subtle differences), works with the frequencies of space and time itself, which can travel independently of normal spacetime.

These physics explain that difference and unity, and goes into excruciating detail.  



It takes MORE time to travel distance in space, RELATIVELY speaking. General Relativity does not reach the same conclusion. If it takes more time to travel distance in space, then it takes less time closer to gravity traveling in a gravitationally contracted space. General Relativity DOES claim that there are more intervals of time closer to gravity but this is because time is faster specifically! Time only appears to be slow because there are many more seconds in between!  Time literally slows down in deep space and speeds up, closer to gravity.

General Relativity claims that time slows down closer to gravity. That is in error. 

A warp drive shrinks the distance to travel in space due to a higher frequency in time. VERY simplified. It also has an effect in time. If we are able to witness a higher frequency of spacetime, we would be able to witness something with a faster motion in time, moving faster in time. 

Light is independent of time because it has no mass. If the sunlight just above a forest canopy casts shadows that all point back to the sun, but can be measured in lower Euclidean dimensions to appear as the light source is JUST over the forest canopy (instead of 93 million miles away), then we ought to be able to observe the light of that higher frequency of spacetime from a lower frequency (in deep space), and observe faster motion in time. 

The paradox of frequency is that deep space can be at higher frequency because matter and mass and gravitation moves more and more slower than the speed of light, the bigger it gets. Oppositely, at higher frequency of mass and inertia, there is faster time, and there is more space. When there is less space, time should speed up however because there is less density. Closer to light there should be less mass and faster time because light is without mass and thus simultaneous in time. All these instances are true and are equal, and yet can be opposite of the other points, which is in paradox for example if someone were at each point of a pyramid, then things would look different compared to where each person stands.

The assumption that time speeds up or slows down is also perceived in different ways, and can be explained differently, using either geometry or wave frequency to illustrate. I think it is incorrect to observe that the faster something goes, the slower it travels however, as General Relativity concludes. Relative acceleration and deceleration tends to clarify that conclusion of General Relativity. 

And if we can see that there is less space to travel in deep space, then we can look at that space as higher frequency space (less density; less paradox of separation; time separates), because if there is less space to travel, it should take less time ESPECIALLY if you could adjust your own time frequency to make the journey, which is what all of this is about.



The secret is not to use inertial acceleration of mass to generate a higher gravity field which increases the frequency of time, because that also increases mass density and will compress space (increasing space; making a larger paradox than unifying the paradox). That does have application however. But, the use of inertial acceleration can be two 180 degree wave phases moving in opposite direction, equal and opposite, which reduces the frequency of space while increasing the frequency of time. 

General Relativity is inadequate to explain such principles and mechanics.



General (and Special) Relativity now serves as an example only, and is no longer able to explain the truth of the universe but only within local frames of frequency, which is not the case when determining the motion of black holes which incurs a much greater frequency difference in time and space.  Relativity changes as soon as you turn on the starship engines, also (after all, it's all relative, and in paradox). 



~.. ~ . ~ . 



I realize this is a unique way to look at the universe and it may give people trouble depending on how well versed they are with university-taught physics. But if people are going to let special relativity stop them cold in their tracks with an assumption that faster than light travel is practically impossible, then that's the end. Special relativity deals with objects like rockets and protons hurdling through space, and does NOT deal with fields of energy which change the dynamics of space and time, or starship engines flying through space. 

It cannot be logically claimed that warp drive is impossible due to special relativity's take on rocks or billiard balls in motion. The ongoing paradox INVARIABLY depends upon your point of view. I've tried real hard but have found no case of an absolute static object-based universe. The universe is fluid, and matter is energy and light, in the form of a paradox and multi-paradoxes.

Frequency itself behaves in opposite ways. For example you can have a high frequency of very dense mass, or a very high frequency of very little mass, both with equal force. If you consider that frequency relates with time, then you can work "empty" scalar space with dense mass-space together integrated all as light, and co-direct force with one common directed path.

​With two opposites, X and Y, there is one common unity -- the radius of the whole, the circle of the two, as one. (See: General Blog, "Paradoxes of Unity" for a better grasp on the mechanics of the paradox itself)


​


There have been instances where Bob Lazar's gravity tube out of Area 51 was reported to freeze time in a gravity engine. Making time still inside the gravity field, rather than speeding it up. But when that field is shut down, time reverted back to it's NORMAL conditions without an event horizon that appears that everything is frozen in time on the inside of the event horizon. 

To be fair General and Special Relativity confirms that reality. Yet the red-shifting of distant star systems demonstrates the stretching of space into a longer wave due to the contraction of space closer in the star system due to gravity which stretches the space at the edges. This also explains a relative "speedbump" aspect near the edges of an "event horizon." (Note: the stars are visually blue-shifted to the naked eye though, to everything outside our star-system's gravity field, just thought I'd mention)

If spacetime can be stretched, it can be contracted. The condensing of electrical space is also a close cousin of capacitance, as electrical condensers were used 100 years ago in Tesla's time.

This is about the best way to explain warp drives though, by NOT using General and Special Relativity but only for example. Seeing how space moves is a better way in my opinion, because GR and SR also are only concerned with what happens outside the event horizons of inner universal events (object-based, instead of frequency-based).

Examining pure frequency and energy, we see that the universe behaves very differently. I'm concerned about the "whys" of this, but I'm more focused on the inception of warp drives than stabbing myself in my foot over it over, and over.  If I can explain how a technology can work, and demonstrate aspects that provides further evidence to it working, even though the physics may be radically different than the usual, then at least there is a basis to take it seriously, and to allow oneself to believe that "yes, it could work."




IF INDEED Gravity does separate mass from a pure higher frequency of light further and further, incurring a longer time wave, as GR and SR suggests (light being the unity of matter and mass, without mass and without time), then GR and SR show that light is unity of time and space, and also implies that the gravity-cancellation engine will increase the ship's frequency in time. 

Regardless, the charts above would be correct in that situation in regards to unified motion of the starship's engines (using the OTC-X1 as the foundation for this). It explains why a black hole must get massive with fast spin, to maintain equilibrium with the rest of the inertial universe.  

It doesn't mean the pictures above are wrong. It means that General and Special Relativity are based around Light Unity, rather than gravitational frequency. Yet and also, if light measures the frequency of time, then we could very well BE backwards with General and Special Relativity. Light should be assumed not to have a speed at all! Mass is what has the speed, the speed of space in gravitational and massive field conditions as Einstein theorized, while time is the speed, the frequency of mass and gravitational information to move from mass to mass -- thus showing the separated universe from pure light; the living paradox of space and time as a universe of energy where there is universal Action not seen as objects (when the ego divorces self from all action and perceives an objective reality of identity and sub-identity instead of fields of energy and Cosmic water and sound and light).  


​
Simultaneous space is Light Space, which is pure unity, and multi-dimensionality, entire fields of time simultaneously in motion, where there is no time in the rest of Existence but only in our little realm we call the "universe."


​
When we can compress space, then we can create a focus, a "compact" of energy and form, which would ALSO LOOK THE SAME as expanding space around a ship, which would STILL shrink it down to a little ball. 
​


​It just makes more sense to show how frequency increases in compressed space, because that's how electricity works, and we're gonna be using electricity to warp time and space obviously, unless we'd rather learn about using pure sound and intention on granite or something.

There can be no model which shows how space and time expand infinitely to achieve light unification that the ego-identity-conscious mind can grasp and relate with. It has to be drawn on paper. It has to fit into a machine. The universe may be able to expand spacetime to make galaxies move, but the human being is small and tiny and is a singular point of view than a universe-all-points-of-view. The Human has to build a little thing and make the universe work in reverse according to him/her. It's easier to contract space to work with the universe in expanded ways than to expand space and work universally upon a smaller space.




The Conclusion:

Also to simplify all that mess below in the other posts, if you can compress space where there is an imbalance then you can expand space at the edges and/or midpoint between normal space and contracted space, so that time slows to a crawl.  That's the Event Horizon. What is inside the Event Horizon is where GR and SR cannot go. I've had huge issues with GR and SR as I'm sure others have, too. But if I just bypass GR and SR without addressing it, then that's irresponsible. The only thing that can truly be done is to integrate GR and SR with models of paradoxes of frequency, and see what truth results, and just take it from there, which does even MORE to explain how the universe works. Time slows to a crawl near an Event Horizon, and we can see how that works due to gravitationally contracted space, which inflates space paradoxically (literally "expansion within").

Literally, every star system is a realm where space is created and expanded around those stars. There is very little actual space between stars in deeper space. There is the illusion of it, but that's the entire nature of the paradox. GR and SR perform calculations on the illusion of space only. Why are black holes so massive? It's because that's the event horizon we see around near-infinitely contracted space, there could be entire light-years to travel actually ever before a pilot reaches the actual singularity or black hole star itself, once passing through the event horizon, to illustrate.

It makes perfect sense and does NOT contradict General and Special Relativity. If anything, because of GR and SR we now have to look at the inflation of space very differently. I could also assume that no one has truly understood General and Special Relativity until the advent of warp drive physics.

​In fact in Bob Lazar's account of turning on the ET gravity engine and observing a burning candle inside the field, after the field was switched off it was shown that the candle had burned all the way out and had melted on the table. That DOES provide an account supporting evidence of a faster time frequency within an Event Horizon. Bob Lazar never mentioned any testing of that aspect of time however, or has told the public any results confirming the existence of a faster flow of time within a gravity field, specifically (he hinted at something, though).

In the case of gravity cancellation, according to special relativity the frequencies of time increase. See: Warp Drive Engineering under the section "LAU-X3 Dragon Eye."


​

This article is dedicated to Sokedai Stu Fanning. Thank you for your Keen Knowledge of University physics.



I had thought that I will have to rework all the General and Special Relativity on this website, it surely needs a LOT of editing; however, it's pretty close as I'm finding out.  It's not an easy read. It's a hard read with lots of heavy science. There are some anomalies though with General and Special Relativity that don't make them incorrect, but instead with a point of view shift, General and Special Relativity is NONE-THE-LESS able to explain the mechanisms of time warping to seem in reverse of standard accepted notions that nothing can exceed the speed of light. 

Gravity and Time are inversely proportional to each other. Gravity is density, and where there's more gravity, there is more separation from Light (Light itself at a state of zero time, or simultaneous time), thus a slower time frequency. ACTUALLY, HERE'S THE PARADOX:

The time frequency INCREASES closer to gravity, but time itself slows down according to observation. That is an unusual paradox. Out in deep space, time is faster because the "time-wave" is longer (more space between each moment; taking fewer seconds to travel a greater distance). More time passes closer to gravity because the "time-wavelength" is shorter. That would make it appear that time slows down closer to gravity (like a black hole) because it takes many, many, many more seconds for ONLY A SINGLE second to pass close to a massive gravitational source.  . . .  So for a guy in a super-space-suit near a black hole to make just one little movement, it takes many, many more seconds in that frequency of super-density. 

That is a true paradox, because only with a longer wavelength of a time frequency (cycles of seconds after each other in a distance of space) can it take less seconds to travel a greater distance!

What the focus is in General Relativity, is the Action itself! The SAME action can take either more time or less time. It should not be considered that the frequency of time allows for more or less action, because that's just relative; it is the action itself which is the only thing that can determine different time frequencies in different spatial locations.

If an action takes more time or less time is what matters. If the same action takes many more seconds to complete, or takes only a tiny fraction of a second to do what would otherwise normally take longer, then we can start to consider how frequencies in time actually work. Space is the big consideration, which forms around frequencies of time. 

It doesn't make any sense, even though it completely opposite and in reverse. A faster time frequency should mean more action can take place when observed in an outside slower time frequency very far away. The reason why we aren't seeing super-accelerated time near a black hole is because there is an EVENT HORIZON! 

Acceleration is also a gravity force according to Einstein's equivalence, and so Special Relativity can apply the relativity of spacetime warps to objects in motion, particularly with compatibly (and comparably) different masses, coincidentally enough. The paradox appears in the same way.

This is why General and Special Relativity can be used to explain how to create spacetime warps in starships, and for a starship to exceed the speed of light. 




FREQUENCY IS THE KEY!  LESS MASS AT HIGHER FREQUENCY is the solution realized by the LAU-X3 lower engine -- the basic OTC-X1, originally conceived and invented by Nikola Tesla, himself!




Gravity and time inversely proportional to each other implies outside the solar system in deep space, outside of a star's gravitational field, one traveling in a rocket is traveling in a much faster frequency of time, Generally, and distance is shortened dramatically, and warped in the presence of gravitational fields and increased mass due to acceleration near the speed of light.

The faster one accelerates, the more one beats the seconds of time frequency, traveling at a slower rate, according to strict General Relativity. 

That is a true paradox.

Increasing gravitational mass however can work toward our advantage, particularly if we can phase two co-counter-rotational gravity waves to zero, thus becoming light, and able to travel independent of time itself, such as a tachyon.

That's the principles of the OTC-X1, and the principles of a negative energy / negative mass warp bubble.

. . .

The conditions observed by UFO researchers however is in opposite. Time speeds up around the craft, and within the craft; the craft travels in a faster frequency of time. Co-counter rotation of gravity fields (magneto-electrostatic inertia) increases the frequency of time, bringing the moments between the seconds closer together in an energy field that permeates and surrounds the craft.

That's the basis of warp drive.

. . .

Relativity has been a HUGE issue!  The paradox of measurement also is a huge issue.  The only way to test these things is in a spaceship capable of warp drive, to get around and make our measurements and observations inside and outside of our Solar system's gravity field, which will seem in direct violation of GR, because of the nature of the engines.

Things seem in reverse!  

At black hole conditions, we can measure time coming to a stand-still, meanwhile gravity waves travel much faster than light (frequency of time as light measures spacetime frequency).

When these issues of General and Special Relativity came up, it really through a wrench in the works of explaining and understanding how GR and SR apply within a warp drive frame of reality.

I have done everything I can to explain these paradoxes though in great detail, where unfortunately the greater detail takes away from the meaning itself of what we can achieve in attempt to convey information to those who are locked into believing that nothing can travel faster than light according to General Relativity, unless someone decides to analyse a lot of data, which is hard work; and most people will avoid that.

. . .

I've tried my best to explain everything so a Layman can understand, without going into Calculus, but I don't think I can avoid that. Sacred Geometry and Vortex Geometry is adequate enough to explain it, but having a grasp on paradoxical theory, and just having to deal with plane ole' confusion is troublesome at best.

Needless to say, I've discovered some very troublesome paradoxes that re-define everything we know currently about Inflation of Space, Relativity, and Light Speed.

I've heard scientists discussing Relativity also and getting things backwards MANY times, for instance claiming the faster one travels, the longer one's day, when it should be the other way around: The faster one travels, one's day gets shorter and shorter, according to Einstein. I'm not the only one who gets confused over Relativity!

I just can't help to think that we're dealing with primitive physics concerning General Relativity, and that the universe is much more clever than we are. Gravity bends light to magnify a distance galaxy in a Gravity Lens. Gravitation bends spacetime to shorten the distance to distant location. It's a very similar concept, but two different applications.

There are also things we've observed in nature, in the universe, in our reality, that clearly violates General Relativity. But those things appear to be covered up and in secret, and our government institutions such as NASA have also been caught in questionable acts to compartmentalize and sanitize space-based information (which was their original Charter and directives).

Tesla believed, and many of our top scientists also believe in a scientific conspiracy to hide the truth, and limit one half of the sciences that we are supposed to already know, brought to us by Tesla and other well-known scientists. It has been shown that Tesla was responsible for most of our modern world, but he was not even in the text books or history books for the longest time. These things cannot be ignored, and are all variables in the grand equation.

So please, all you scientists out there reading this website, bare with me as far as the Relativity goes. 

I have tried to stick with mainstream thought, however in the Starship Relativity blog post below, I really think I have something there showing that within a strong field of gravitation, time is faster (Tesla), but surrounding that field of gravitation, time is slower (Einstein).

Simply put, in the center of for example the sun, or the Earth, the gravity is at a zero because all the mass is surrounding the center, creating gravitation and curvature of spacetime. So in the center of the star, or planet, that is in the future then the slower time on the outer surface (because inertial mass gravitation and acceleration speeds up the time frequency; yet time speeds up away-from and apart-from a gravity field -- the time that is from beyond the event horizon observed from within the event horizon -- thus time is slower on the surface of a planet or star, and faster toward the center, slowing down the outside time and speeding up the inside time frequency).

That is also, a paradox.


That is why the Relativity is confusing and potentially frustrating. 

This isn't rocket science; it is warp drive physics. It SHOULD be hard, but it doesn't have to be. No holds barred, all things revealed.

RECAP:


A warp bubble raises the frequencies of time so that more action can take place in that field.

Relatively speaking, the same action takes place in less time. 

Those are two different ways of looking at the same thing, and is also the same thing seen in two different ways. It is interchangeable when gravity (inertial mass) is not changed but requires a change of inertial mass without a change in gravity. Gravity and inertial mass are interchangeable also. There is a force generated, but under only one condition will an increased acceleration of inertial mass DECREASE the force of gravitation from increased mass. 

That means that an accelerated proton would lose mass as it approaches the speed of light under this one and only condition, basically, to make that analogy. That does not violate general relativity or special relativity, but relativity is what explains the mechanism of the one-and-only condition.


Also, relatively speaking, near a black hole, the same action would take place in much more time (taking much longer).


But the conditions reverse on the other side of the event horizon. There has to be an event horizon, because there are two different frames of reality. There is no real separation though, because energy is exchanged when the existence of each other is discovered. The fact of observing such a thing means that it is not separate from the universe, but part of it.

The black hole is a gravitational vortex, with high frequency energy being released out the poles, due to the high compression of space due to gravity. It is an energy generator, a relative singularity of energy and matter creation. Around the nucleus of some distant galaxies, we can see a water membrane form around the core, comprised mainly of black holes.



Space and Time can be transformed in a warp drive. Hyperspace teleportation is the condition of having undefined space, where time approaches infinity -- the Light Drive.  . . .  Space and Time INTERFERE with each other (interference waves ; inversely proportional with each other ; paradoxical). Light (information) reflects back to us, information, measuring space AND time, because light is not space and time and all space and time, having no mass, and is the unity of the two as one.



. . .   also see the blog post below a ways entitled, "Negative Space and time (Negative Energy) ..."

In a simultaneous co-counter rotating field of gravitation, it would do no good to make a vertical engine core also in co-counter rotation. Polarization is rotation in one way only. And so the vertical core also polarizes the top half of the warp drive vortex in the center of the Outer Ring engine, and above the Central Accumulator -- monopolar. Polarization of a simultaneous field is the idea. 

Polarization of electrostatic creates an electromagnet. 

Magneto-electrostatic polarization of light is mass.

Note increased inertial gravitational frequency in the Core, and increased negative gravitation at the outer circumference -- a negative warp bubble, while also including additional (increasing) vortex polarity of accelerating mass.

It occurs to me that not everyone knows who Nikola Tesla was. He was the most brilliant scientific genius of all time. He gave us our modern world. 

He created AC power generation, and refined the DC power systems. He gave us wireless transfer of power, wireless communication, radio communication, the foundation of Radar and advanced beam weapons, remote control, robotics, television, perfected the light bulb. He created the technology of hydro-electric power, geo-thermal power generation, and was responsible for the construction of the power generator system of Niagara Falls ..  fluid hydrodynamics, he harnessed the secrets of lightning and power generation from no moving parts. He developed micro mechanical resonance devices that could create huge Earthquakes. He was able to beam a huge amount of energy to Russia. He created the basis of stargates, and was able to transfer a huge amount of electricity anywhere in the world, and beyond the world. He also gave us antigravity technologies, the basis for time travel and warp drive. He was the leading scientist at the Philadelphia Experiment, but the govt and military wouldn't listen to him, and that's why the accident (it wasn't Tesla's fault, even though he designed the engines and equipment). Tesla's accomplishments are nearly endless. When I say he gave us our modern world, he literally did.

Tesla's science was where HAARP came from, death rays and even power generation from radioactive sources. He was involved in the first implementation of a nuclear bomb. He knew of technology that was extraordinarily dangerous, and extraordinarily beneficial. He was a great philanthropist with the world's best interest always in his heart and mind.

Tesla said, "if you want to understand the secrets of the universe, think in terms of frequency, vibration, and energy."

There's a brief introduction to Tesla, just in case no one knew about him. He was the greatest scientific mind of all time, and is suspiciously absent from our history books. When he died, all his technology and property was confiscated under the "Alien Information Protection Act." He was one of the most brilliant scientists in all of history, and his accomplishments is one of the greatest cover-ups of all times.

Luckily, his X-1 designs survived through Otis T. Carr, and so now we have "warp drive physics" and "hyperdrive teleportation physics."



Now, let's get to the important stuff about frequency and vibration.


. . .


. . .  If I have said "because of the frequency of the engines" anywhere, I really am implying the frequency vibration of the ship, including the shape of the ship structure acting like a conductive speaker box (a super-conductive speaker box would be better).

The dimension of vibration should be introduced formally in these physics so that it is not mis-construed the nature of an energy field without conductive resonance properties to the entirety of the ship itself. The ship has to be able to resonate with the wave-frequencies of, and generated by the engines.

The more right angles on a ship, the less resonance. The more little separate doo-dads protruding from the ship, or a more complex ship hull design, would definitely lower the resonance.

The concept of relativity, and concepts of Gravitation should be well known by now. Frequency relativity is expressed in a totally different geometry than general and special relativity; but as long as there is all of that, then everything can back each other up and reinforce the existences of each other.


It may still be difficult to understand how the engines work, as far as how you move a spark in many dimensions to warp time and space and create gravitation and to vibrate very rapidly, and quickly, and at a super-high sound that seems to be another form of matter and existence in its own right.


If we look at it as vibration, instead of as raw heavy super-massive destructive gravity forces, then we can truly see the elegance of such a music. 

That is what frequency is doing, which results in gravitation. But it's all frequency. Gravitation is no more than vibration.

Onboard gravity is due to the vibration of the X-1 disk underneath the cockpit. The resonance is due to the utrons and electromagnets co-counter-rotating. The hull shape is how that resonance is conducted, as is the central accumulator on the inside of the hull, with a shape of its own in the geometry of two "light-cones" stuck together, to use relativity terms.

What resonates is magneto-electrostatic frequencies, in frequencies of rotation and co-rotation. Those frequencies are an expression of a design of matter and mass, in vibration, as a unified energy.

That's the concept.

The vertical core vibration, and the Outer Ring vibration, is a frequency of unity, which is light, which is matter and mass, charge, geometry, a frequency of space itself. At high frequency, even if an electrical current is a million volts, it will harmlessly glance over the pilot's skin as a whispy plasma. As mass and inertia is also involved, then it is the frequency of matter and reality and space, of the energy of that frame of shape and solidity, which is that force-field of energy which is matter; and vibrating at a higher frequency, the matter of the starship is changed, and gravitates and vibrates at a higher vibration, including the pilots.

The frequency of the vibration of that ship-energy-matter-mass solid "thing" which does the thing that it does to define itself, which is vibrating mass, is the acceleration of the frequency of the vibration mass! When you are also vibrating at the same rate as the particle accelerator, then you really don't feel any affects from a near-by proton zipping by your head at light speed, because you would also be vibrating at light speed, and the proton would be a little small harmless speck.

The ship can vibrate at frequencies that are harmonics of the speed of light to achieve an overall vibration of light, which is the beauty of Tesla physics.

So, merely realizing the key of the concept of "Vibration and Frequency" makes it easy to see how the gravity forces of the ship won't tear itself apart, nor be harmful to the pilots. I hope that clears up that ramble that's in a few other places and posts.

It also presents us another paradox! Yay! How, if the ship is vibrating so rapidly, and the pilots aren't feeling gravity forces, how is the ship actually generating gravitation??

It might take me a week to answer that question, and I hope I don't have to update half the website because of the answer. Or I could take a shortcut. It's not. But it is! It's all relative.

And that's what's so kewl about it!


Tesla said if you want to know how the Universe works, think of the Universe in terms of "Frequency, Vibration, and Energy."


IF the pilots couldn't feel the gravity forces then they would have to come up with a new type of physics on their own, to help them understand what was going on. It would have to deal with frequency and vibration, and  "Energy-motion."

It would involve the movement of frequency space, and the movement of frequency within space, directions of frequencies of matter and inertial "temperment."

Electrostatic energy from a wide squirrel cage balanced on a vertical pole will beam straight up and down in a column that is just as wide as the squirrel cage. Here's another peculiar dimension of action of the vertical core which pulls a beam of space into the core, pulling the starship along like a gravitational airplane propeller.

It could also be claimed that it adds a frequency on top of the Central Accumulator that extended the frequencies of the top half of the Accumulator into a distance of space, giving it a lift on that side according to the frequency of the vibration.

I should stop right there, and let that sink in.

The vertical core uses internal forces of frequency and vibration upon the central accumulator to stretch the central accumulator through space on one side, generating electrical lift.


. . .


The Outer Ring drive, and the X-1 outer engine-action also can be considered in geometry. The Outer Ring is above and wider than the X-1 engine. That makes another cone shape of energy. However, the overall field relation can be seen in the Walter Baumgartner images in the downloadable on the Home page, but I will post them here.

The disappearance of rotation in the electric poles is the de-polarization of magnetic forces due to co-counter-spinning rotations of polar magnetic forces in the case of transforming between an electromagneto-static (magneto-electrostatic) wave, and an electrostatic wave. Note the degeneration of mass along the outer equatorial edge and along the equatorial plane, and the accumulation of mass in the center and at the poles. This is describing Inertial Discplacement in spherical geometry fields. This also explains why the vertical core can extend the mass displacement (mass = energy of inertial frequency) of the Central Accumulator that operates within a spherical field of the radius of the X-1 horizontal disk and electromagnet perimeter-edge.

It is also describing a negative energy warp bubble. Things to note are the presence of di-electric fields, and height of electro-magnetic poles.


However, there is another way to look at this: the frequencies of inertial forces and gravitation. Electrical co-counter rotation of increased frequencies of gravitation is what we're looking at -- a spacetime gravitational warp bubble achieved by electrical frequencies and mass rotation. It's the energy of mass which starts to phase to zero in magneto-electrostatic vibration (speeds, and frequency of vibration). Vibration is the speed of motion of each atom, and of all atoms. Everything vibrates; everything is in motion, and moves or otherwise "vibrates" and "is."

On the Home page, the concepts of Relative Acceleration and Relative Deceleration are applied in Special Relativity, and it is seen how the OTC-X1 co-counter- rotation is a Relative Acceleration, and increases the frequency of Gravitation.

Gravitation is also inertial resonance in a magneto-electrostatic field, in the case of the X-1 engine.

The field mechanics of gravitation should be easy to see with the LAU-X3 systems, upon examining this website.

I wanted to make note of this one particular concept, because I think it is the key to understanding a more advanced form of unified physics. 

Resonance deals with time, motion, and unity. Volts increase when the electromagnetic current is in resonance through the bundles of coils in a generator -- the more windings of the coil(s) makes higher volts, in time with the oscillation of each magnetic pole. The more magnets around a rotor, the more high volts can be made with more ... higher frequency. Resonance. (frequency: in like a 2 phase AC generator with a coil wound around 10 posts around the rotor -- a complete circle wound around one post, then the other, etc. Each circle has to flow in the same direction of the current -- each post is wound the opposite way -- or it cancels the polarities and nothing happens; if you have 10 magnets N-S-N-S-N-S ... etc, around a stator, then every 36 degrees around a circle, as it spins, there is one-half wavelength, when the circle rolls back up to North again, it will have completed a 360 degree rotation; get it up to spin really fast, higher volts, and also higher frequency, because the time between each magnet becomes less; the faster it spins, the higher the frequency (time of each coil passing a magnet) x the number of times the coil is wound in a circle (volts). Basically.) 

Resonance however is not linear. Instead of just one thing determining change, now there's two things and also 2 dimensions of travel (around and around in a circle, thus with a form of an area of a circle equation).

Resonance of accelerating forces (accelerating forces: seen in equations in the form of f=ma^2) are seen as the space shuttle flies around the Earth, and also as the Earth spins. Resonance in this case is the multiplication of accelerating forces ... but also with positive and negative values and squares and square roots that we won't get into in any complexity. Those are inertial forces and frequencies that warp time, and thus is an increase of mass, or relative decrease of mass, depending on if the space shuttle is orbiting westward (chasing the sun) or eastward respectively. If a thousand space shuttles were all spinning in the same orbit, equally spaced out, you could start thinking about how the Earth can be moved around like a space ship using some exotic ring-engine.

It couldn't fly too fast, but it could fly around the solar system, faster in places and slower closer to the sun. 

The LAU-X3 could move faster since it is also directing gravity force into the "Eye of the Dragon." (the vortex).

An increase in mass, or a decrease in mass is proportional to the increase or decrease in gravitation. Acceleration = Gravitation.


In resonating electromagnetic fields of inertia, in vortex geometry, it raises up the dimensions, unifying the field in a geometrical shape that can resonate with vacuum space more directly. 


A central accumulator's role is now more obvious. An increase in frequency (the compression of the wave in time), and depolarization of accelerating inertial mass, or rather not "depolarization" but a compressing force against the outside perimeter of the engine squeezes the inertia to the center, electromagnetically conducted by inertial polarities (zero polarity around the perimeter, and "one" in the center). We could claim it to be a negative "one" because it represents the negative energy of inertial reduction, and thus mass reduction around the outer field of the starship.

After all, there is a NASA model of a warp drive starship design with an outer ring, and a football-shaped central accumulator.

[Inertial] Displacement: The inertial force around the perimeter displaces itself, and it has to accumulate in the center, because that's the only place it can accumulate -- transverse to the circumference. That's the only direction the inertial force can travel; it is a re-polarization of inertial forces that can satisfy NASA's requirement for a negative energy value that is also in a theoretical range of General and Special Relativity; rather what Relativity claims is possible, and in particular in a "bubble" around the starship.

It is the "warp bubble" itself that has the negative energy value. It can also apply similarly to the vertical core, compressing the space in front of the starship even further by using the addition of that engine, rather than just using a single-axis plane that does not make use of the height of the origin as a dimensional expansion.


. . .


Time Dilation:  According to Ralph Ring, 15 minutes can pass on the OTC-X1 to 1 second on Earth, as it felt to him (even though the OTC-X1 is known more for teleportation, the time frequency must be faster to allow for travel within a range of a space-distance of 1 second; and also that can easily be understood as the frequency or strength of the warp bubble generated to allow for an inertial force such as a vertical engine to propel a craft in the fashion of a warp drive; so there are different "flight modes" possible using the same physics). That puts the ship in a much higher time frequency, much faster than the speed of light at full speeds at such a high frequency. That gives re-assurance to the design of the LAU-X3 being more cost-efficient to construct and test, then that of some more elaborate level of sophistication. It makes for a very, VERY strong warp-bubble. It doesn't quite take time to zero or infinity, due to it's finite level of RPMs (only 680 RPM to achieve high frequency teleportation), but through resonance with the vertical core helping to build up the speed of the lower X-1 engine, and working in tandem with the outer ring both to generate even MORE speed, and also to field-resonate the gravitational fields together, then it makes for a very spectacularly fast ship! 

Including the resonance increase of field energy from the [electrical and protonic] charged particle flow through the vertical and outer ring engines, it could well exceed NASA's time-table for travel to our closest star on some orders of magnitude making for the pilots to experience a simple weekend trip, or even hours (NASA's time table is 2 months which is way too slow for what a basic engine should be able to do).

Just think what a ship could do that can accelerate engine rotational velocities up to the speed of light (electrostatic wave speed: 220,000 miles per second). Twin double vortex construction with a double-pole vertical accelerator (double helix like DNA co-counter rotation) upgrade, and it would be inter-galactic, rather that just interstellar, a true Tachyon drive. As it stands, a caduceus AC spiral of particle flow through the vertical core can be tested using the same basic mechanics of the timing and porting/venting of the vertical engine. 

With all these concepts in physics and engineering truly studied, the LAU-X3 can be seen to be a good design as a test ship and learning platform that can reach other stars. Operating in a different set of mechanics, say that of hyperspace teleportation, the distance the LAU-X3 can travel in one second (that would be a large distance if it takes 15 minutes to traverse that distance) would be its "jump frequency." Since the vertical core compresses space specifically (harnessing a gravity force like a pocket of gravity in front of the ship that the perpetually falls into), then the distance the ship could travel in 15 minutes to the pilots to one second on Earth would be quite a leap. See: "Interstellar Teleportation" at the bottom of the Warp Drive News page. 

There are seemingly different sets of mechanics that just the OTC-X1 operates under as both teleportation and warp drive, as well as true antigravity.


. . .


Time Travel:  If Relative Acceleration or Deceleration as seen on the Home page in the "notes on relativity" section up top allows for faster or slower rates of time, then there are polarities of positive and negative time (relative forward and relative backwards flows). I don't want to confuse things at this point, though. It is known the X-1 engine can create higher frequencies of time "clock-ticks" (see the next posts down), and lower the inertial mass (displacement of inertial frequencies). The outer ring can also change the frequencies of gravitation, and carry the energy frequencies through the hull space (using capacitor plate vanes or vents) to the inner core and return in a circuit. Two different gravitational frequency fields would make a huge difference in resonance (multiplying the frequencies even further).

It would be faster in time, then gravitation, but the frequencies would multiply immensely with a much higher compression of spacetime in front of the ship (and much less behind the ship) then the standard warp drive metrics.


Inertial displacement can also apply to teleporting distances -- in a frequency field as a "range of its temporal frequency" and even "temporal displacement" -- being anywhere possible within a range of a field of distance, anywhere in a one-second radius, for example. 

. . .


An upgrade to the vertical core is possible to handle a counter-rotational spin of accelerated mass (separated by a cylinder wall) which would put the frequency geometry into that of Relative Acceleration. That could provide additional fine-tuning of the engine fields. The new outer segment of the cylinder can be made to counter-rotate (which can easily be handled from a separate motor to rotate the outer segment of the inner vertical core of the ship, if the engine dynamics can't do that alone). 

Plasma/air flow can be directed in a counter-spiral through the outer housing of the vertical core. In fact, the whole cylinder doesn't have to rotate but could handle rotating internal components within the cylinder housing, built around segments of slanted coils that spin in opposite of the vertical core of cones, or at the very least coils between each ring of repulsive magnets. It is the relative motion of the change of magnetic fields which generates electricity, so there can be some electrical generation in the vertical core housing (inside the housing, the cones moves against themselves and can be fitted with coils, as per the diagrams on the Home page).

The inclusion of a Relative Acceleration curve would make a huge difference in the resonance of gravitation.

If a separate motor to spin the assemblies within the housing is required, there is resonance that can be harnessed by the magnetic forces of the spinning cones over sensitive pick-up coils for overunity. More research should be done on co-counter rotating plasma spirals against ring-segments of magnets, otherwise by using vanes (flat metal plates stacked, with an air space between each one, similar to capacitors) that spiral down the cylinder-housing's internal space, the plasma can be electrically guided. 

It can all easily handle AC or DC geometry in these shapes; and non-conductive parts of the vanes can be arranged so that there can be pulsing positive and negative charges down the vanes, timed with engine rotation, guiding the plasma flow electrically (and with acceleration).


. . .


The concept of "resonance" is like magic to some people, who don't understand it. But as long as it can be seen as a real concept, as in the cases illustrated on the Home page up at the top, then the student of Gravitation can play with the thought of it. A concept of gravitational resonance may simplify the physics even further. It can explain the mechanism of wave-function of the accumulation of inertial frequency at the central accumulator. That can be considered an inversion of inertial frequency (change of inertial mass) to "negative space" required in the Alcubierre metrics. It would be interesting to see if the OTC-X1 floated exactly the distance of the radius of the central utron disk, above the ground.

I'm just playing with the thought. A resonance field is going to "unfold the dimensions of the engine geometry," and realize effects in harmony with quantum vacuum space. I think the more classical approach of relative tachyon drive mechanics may still apply, but being able to travel in a resonance with vacuum space may fill the gap left from the sudden jump of mass into light.

Since "resonance space" applies upon ...  space (the vacuum), then it would be somewhat unaffected by gravitational forces not within the starship's space. It would be easiest and fastest to travel in deep space, but flying closer to the sun and inner planets (and flying into another star's gravity field that exceeds a certain inertial mass frequency "gravitytime zone", for that matter) may not be an issue due to the multiple engine systems.

At any rate, I'm confident in the information on this website to date. I hope to see some Outer Ring tests on youtube done by a whole bunch of different people. Might be less scary then duplicating an OTC-X1. It would have to have some kind of capacitor plates and central accumulator mechanism, maybe slapped together in a crude test model. What would the ring do by itself? 

If anything new comes up, I'll be sure to update; but at the very least, I hope this website brings people "up to speed" with this special type of unified physics. 

I want to encourage people to live wholesome lives firstly. Look what we've got ...  here it is. If anything, we have potential. We Create. As long as we can understand the physics, then the engineering is right there.



Resonance also relates to thought and emotion. Whatever frequency you resonate in, is going to be the frequency you experience. Not only can you choose frequencies, but you can create new ones (as long as they are positive of the highest honor to Life -- that qualifying the actions of unconditional love).

UPDATED!!!!   FIGURED IT OUT!!!   See the bottom of this post. Time is faster closer to gravity between fixed points of reference, without motion and speed being involved.  3/28/15



Recently, I've been thinking about higher frequency atmospheric conditions over the surface charge of Earth ground. Particularly where UFO sightings are found to be more common. Some we can see from the ground, some requires a certain frequency field to be able to see UFO's vibrating in a higher frequency in the air.

It doesn't really have anything to do with curved space or gravity, but with frequency conditions.

The Tesla tower showed that higher frequency occurred over the surface of the Earth; the higher over the surface, the higher the frequency.

A starship would have to lower its frequency in order to land on the surface.

What if a starship comes from another place than Earth, for example from a higher-frequency system? How would the ship lower its frequency lower than the place where it was constructed, to land on Earth (Earth would be vibrating at a lower frequency then say, an Ascended planetary "life-sphere")?

It would have to make an electrical ground connection with Earth surface (like a rod stuck in the surface), and reverse its internal transformers and carry that frequency throughout the ship, electrically "grounding out" the ship.

Frequency deals with time and vibration more than gravity does. The frequency increase in the upper atmosphere of Earth and above the atmosphere (resonance of higher frequency atmosphere through the vacuum of space) would affect time, speeding up time farther from gravity, but without having anything at all to do with gravity being the thing that affects time.

Because if gravity were the thing that affected time, the more gravity is at a higher frequency of mass concentration. Space and Time is one fabric. So there are two conditions that affect time: Gravity Frequency (inertial energy) -- indirect, and Electrical Frequency (magneto-electrostatic) -- direct. 



The OTC-X1 engine (and the Outer Ring engine) doesn't necessarily use the principles of gravity at all, because all inertial forces are in balance and equilibrium at all times.

The Vertical engine of the LAU-X3 (central vertical core of cones) however uses both gravity and electrical principles (electro-gravity).


This could very well explain the difference between General and Special Relativity, and Tesla Frequency Relativity, as far as how those situations affect time-measurements and time dilations (different "time zones" of how fast or slow time flows).


Magneto-electrostatic energy alone is not what makes such changes, unless it is in the same geometry of a stellar object such as a planet, star or black hole (double vortex), or as the magneto-electrostatic resonance field of a gravity frequency.

As a result, these physics at this website have inadvertently become a unified hybrid, and in some parts without clearly making the distinctions about what causes what (although there is no causality, a black hole causes the existence of a galaxy; the universe is the result of our existence; the biological fractal causality is in the middle of all known frequency ranges of the universe, shown by Nassim Haramein 
https://vimeo.com/51309681).



That would certainly make it more difficult for mathematicians to calculate precise Relativity, possibly explaining imprecision in certain GPS systems. Also, it explains why Special and General relativity seem to "get things backwards" in instances where we can observe objects visually closer to the sun and planets, in those static frequency fields.



All a higher-frequency starship (and crew) has to do is electrically ground their systems, in the ship and biologically, to match Earth surface frequency. Maybe it would make it harder for them to raise their frequency back up to depart and return to their origin, but I doubt it. Frequency transformation can easily be done. A ship engines alone makes it to where all frequencies can be experienced.



A higher gravity-field electrical resonance in the atmosphere would imply that there is stronger inertial frequency there (not necessarily stronger gravity). Gravitational resonance increases the normal effect of gravity, and that can be seen throughout galactic geometry. The gravitational force at the surface of Earth would become less at higher altitudes, due to the increased frequency resonance of the field at higher altitude, making the gravity weaker by a phasing polarity of gravity, relatively, the higher one is over the surface if we consider gravitational resonance fields. Likewise, there would be neutral gravity at some point directly between the Earth and moon, which cancels the gravity effect of the Earth, and of the moon individually. 

I think that's more of an oddity, though. I'm thinking about deleting that paragraph above, it's rather counter-intuitive. I do want to point something out, though. On the Home page I mention forces of "relative acceleration" and "relative deceleration," particularly dealing with near-Earth orbit and atmospheric travel and motion. Magneto-electrostatic resonance fields can occur in both atmosphere, and in a vacuum (near-Earth orbit, where there is no atmosphere). For example a satellite can generate an electrostatic energy wave from working with ions and gas in an engine, but the electrostatic wave will still propagate through a vacuum as long as it's first generated in air (static). 

If a jet or near-Earth orbiting rocket or satellite travels in the same curved path and speed both around the Earth, and out deeper in space away from the Earth, there will be a measured difference in temporal relativity due to the proximity to Earth because Earth generates a resonance field gravitationally, inertially, and electrically. You could observe the same thing geometrically, as well. 

The moon doesn't appear to actually be traveling that rapidly because it's so far away from the Earth, and that is another aspect of relativity is relative motion (acceleration and/or deceleration) pertaining to orbits. There are many different ways to look at a countless number of finite variables involved, including with resonance. The Earth and the moon are in a type of gravitational resonance with each other but the vibration of one object can also be considered a resonance field, even though it may take two things to establish a resonance; a vibration is resonance of a one. Honestly, I just want to point out the existence of resonance fields at this point, and I'm not intending to explain it or do anything with it. I'm just somewhat loading it into the "up front memory buffer."

That tangent aside:


Time is at a higher frequency when GPS satellites are moving at a higher frequency, adding inertial frequency to the satellite, even though it is relatively in a fixed position over Earth via line-of-sight at all times (it has to move faster to keep up with the rotation over the Earth, and to balance out it's vector of motion to that of the vector of the pull of gravity).

As in the case of objects orbiting the Earth in a close orbit, like the space shuttle or the International Space Station (ISS), they would be in a different resonance like the rubber ball which rubbed against a crystal bowl causes the bowl to vibrate -- different "sounds" to each object. The resonance of its motion quickly across the Earth's sky, in either the forward direction of Earth's rotation or the backward direction, would create a frequency change that is different from a GPS satellite in a fixed position traveling in similar relative motion to the Earth.

Near-orbit objects or vehicles have a higher pull of gravity to overcome, and must travel faster. Their time frequency is a little slower to maintain that separation or distance over Earth because they're moving so fast in space (spatial distance) relative TO the Earth.

Higher-orbit GPS satellites don't have to deal with the close resonance of the static gravity field frequency of Earth, and have a little bit of a faster flow of time, because it's also generating its own resonance frequency.




What is the time zone of the moon? Hmm. It orbits the Earth. Orbiting the central sun, planetary time zones are merely relative according to their mass, and different harmonic distances from the sun, and relative motion with/against each other (coming and going) since all the planets orbit relative with the sun. 

The moon has a slight relative acceleration (moving against Earth's spin), but is not traveling very fast (it travels 1/7th the arc of the sky per day). It has a lot of mass, but not nearly the amount of mass of Earth. It is far enough away from Earth so that it is not in Earth's immediate near-resonance field. It's spin is also very, very slow, enough to make one side somewhat affixed pointing to Earth. I would say Earth clock rate ticks faster, but it's fairly well-balanced.

Jupiter should have a little faster time frequency than the Earth (it's revolving around the sun slower, but it has more mass), but then Venus should have a slower time frequency than the Earth (Venus is closer in resonance to the sun, but is in motion faster, but the clock rate will change depending on when Venus is coming or going). Mercury should have a faster time frequency because it's just so close to the sun HOWEVER, there is a slow time speed-bump near gravitational sources as seen in the post below, "Starship Relativity," which shows Mercury's time zone ought to be slower. Special relativity adjusts the time frequency between the motions of the each planet to each other, as each planet also is in motion around the sun (coming or going relative to another planet, and on what side of the sun and in what gravitational alignments).

Gravity affects space, and frequency affects time (General, and Special inertial relativity).

If time flowed faster outside the solar system (away from gravity), it would have a limited range until the space started to be stretched between gravity fields beyond the normal time flow. On a sheet of rubber, Y is time, X is space. Stretch space and you still have to deal with it taking time to travel an even longer distance. Time also takes longer to cross the distance, and so time is also stretched (lowered in frequency) -- expansion of space due to acceleration and gravity. The stars are none-the-less in the same places and not moving farther or closer or farther. Gravity makes it appear as if distant star systems and galaxies are moving away from everything, but only because it is the pull of gravity that warps the spacetime frequencies. Dark matter has been attributed to keeping this balance, but there is a balance.

The red shifting of distant stars is not because they are moving farther away from us (the stars have been in the same places for thousands of years, look at the pyramids, the Sumerian Hall of Records, too), but it is because the force of gravity is Equivalent to an acceleration force. The distant stars are still in the same location, just red shifted due to gravity's pull, not because they are physically moving apart.

Equivalence means that Gravity is equivalent to acceleration. Gravity has a pull, it doesn't mean the stars are actually accelerating farther away. It's like saying a black hole's gravity is so strong not even light can escape it; meanwhile, light and gravity waves travel at the same speeds. Gravity waves are not somehow magically traveling faster than light waves at the same frequency (actually there is one exception; see "Starship Relativity" post down below). Gravity itself couldn't even be felt beyond the event horizon, and it would close itself off from the universe, and we wouldn't even know about a black hole'e existence. Thus, there is no event horizon, if it is claimed that light speed and gravity waves travel at the same speed. Particle fountains and high energy cosmic rays spew forth from a black hole, luminously.

An Event Horizon depends upon gravity waves traveling faster than the speed of light; and under normal conditions it does not, or does it? Does gravity actually have a wave? Or is "Gravitation" a force of resonance of the combination of waves that is the very shape of space itself?

Also, just because our Sun has been here long enough to receive 13 billion years of light from the universe (distant galaxies and what have you), doesn't mean the universe is 13 billion years old. It means our Sun is 13 billion years old. Paradoxes! It's just common sense! It's called "paradoxical relativity."

I do want to be careful about saying there is no event horizon to a black hole, however. The situation above is an exercise in logic only. However the age of the sun is correct.




I keep coming back to this one thing -- "Unifiable" Relativity -- and it seems to be the most important "reality" to "graph."




If one shot a powerful visible laser to Jupiter from Earth, they would have to aim where they visually see that Jupiter will be in seconds, because the light takes time to travel from Jupiter to Earth. Observers would watch in amazement as the laser took a curved path to Jupiter. The light from Jupiter is where it was, not where it is, just like hearing the sound from a Jet crossing overhead. Special relativity is a necessary inclusion of calculation to launch a probe to another planet.

As the planet Mercury passes around behind the Sun, at some distance across the midpoint behind the Sun, the light from Mercury will be bent around the Sun so it appears as if it comes out from around the Sun faster than when we expect it to be. But it's spin is also increased, and we can't make up the difference unless we factor in the Sun's gravity field and how it speeds up time.

Special relativity is different than General relativity. General relativity deals with the mass of the planet or star or stellar object (even a massive probe), of how its mass affects time and space.

"Tesla relativity" is the direct frequency adjustment of spacetime, directly transforming the frequency of spacetime through an energy field, rather than accelerating forces of inertial mass.




~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.




Take a look at the image below. Modern General Relativity shows that time is slower closer to a gravitational source. But Historical Record from the Sumerian Hall of Records show that time passes faster in the star system than outside the star system. The Nephlim used monoatomic gold to stay young and healthy for the duration that the Elder gods (Anunnaki) were gone. 3600 years (one "Shar" or "day") would pass to one "Anunnaki Day" where they are from, just outside the solar system (that pertains to the orbits, not the time dilation). The same people would return to Earth, but their children, the Nephlim were older because more time passed on Earth, and less time passed in the time zone just outside the Solar system. Ancient record is opposite of what General Relativity states. "Rule by Secrecy" by Jim Marrs also correlates with information out of the Sumerian Hall of Records.

The picture below is a rough representation of the time dilation, in a visual form, according to General Relativity. According to General Relativity, it is indeed possible for a gravity force to be completely neutralized, thus proving that the OTC-X1 does indeed lower inertial mass, where the mass of a space vehicle to go to zero in an energy field. By reducing mass, gravity is neutralized (phased to zero, or to a very low number), which allows for the time frequency of the ship to be much higher. So the pilots would witness time slowing down dramatically all around them, while they were sped up in a faster flow of time in the ship. Gravity (inertial mass) neutralization.

The point of reference is outside the solar system, but General Relativity is measured from Earth as the fixed point of reference usually. That may change the results. If only 10 years pass in time frame (A), and say 100 years passes in time frame (B), then time-frame B is at a faster frequency, and thus spatial distance is shortest.

Expansion of space stretches the space, and thus it takes longer time to travel a distance -- a temporal distance is lengthened in its frequency. Expansion of space violates General Relativity, if we are to consider time speeds up away from a gravitationally high inertial mass frequency (frequency = in time).

Expansion of space actually violates Special Relativity though, not General Relativity. 


The picture below is Special Relativity, not GR. 

The picture above is Special Relativity. And yet it is called and considered General by many scientists, because the spin and rotation of the planets relative to each other, and to the sun in particular has the highest factors involving the changes of time, which are measured as being very, very, very, very slight! (See the Caption)



General Relativity is one of the most confusing things ever, because of the conflicts and violations with other well-known theories. Special Relativity is more commonly used than General Relativity because all bodies are in motion relative with other bodies. But atomic clocks have measured the difference in time dilation at sea level, and on top of a mountain. 

Could those clocks have been misread, or the results falsified? Neutralizing the gravity field would bring time to a zero, frozen; but nothing can reach an absolute zero because all motion stops, and we see UFO's zipping around rapidly in the skies.




According to General Relativity:

Time going to a zero is the result of frequency acceleration, to where the spaces in between each moment get less and less, so that much, much more time actually passes within the field. That doesn't make sense, does it? It would appear that engines accelerating mass electrostatically (220,000 miles per second) accomplishes the electrical energy of mass moving in parallel instead of being electromagnetically accelerated in a transverse wave (at 90 degrees, see: Tesla Engineering Physics page); and also acceleration at light speed increases the gravitational force (Equivalence: gravity and acceleration is the same) thereby bringing time to a stand-still because the more gravity means the slower the time flow. But that makes no sense, because protons can be accelerated at the speed of light in a particle accelerator, generating a huge inertial mass field of a single proton (enough to shake the entire ground for miles), but does NOT slow the proton down to a halt.

Bringing gravity to a zero should speed up time infinitely, to that of light itself -- a photon. At the level of infinity, zero is the same as infinite. Zero time, meaning no time is just the same as meaning all time at once, simultaneously.


We have two zero conditions, one of Special Relativity, and the other of General Relativity. Therefore testing mass accelerated to light speed is the same as testing the flow of time closer to a huge gravitational source like the sun, since acceleration and gravity is EQUIVALENT. The difference is that a proton at light speed has a huge inertial mass and gravitational force, BUT the accelerated proton does not meet the condition of: "The faster it goes, the slower it goes."


A proton in an accelerated frequency of spacetime, and thus having a higher gravity does NOT slow down time in its frequency frame of motion and energy. Electricity moves at light speed. What is electrons but the movement of electron-mass carried along via charge either di-electrically in parallel, or electromagnetically in transverse? An electron however, is much different than a proton. Electrons adjust frequency, protons adjust gravity. Adjusting frequency can adjust gravity, and adjusting gravity (inertial mass) can adjust frequency. How can frequency and gravity be transformed?

As frequency increases, inertial mass (gravity) decreases? But it is those higher frequencies which causes the proton to move faster, increasing its inertial frequency so that it's mass increases and has stronger gravity. They move together! Only in an engine like the OTC-X1 do you see an increase in frequency (time; Y-axis) with a decrease in gravity (space; X-axis), but that is due to simultaneous co-counter-spins of electrical inertial force.


So therefore, General Relativity violates Equivalence, and thus violates Special Relativity conditions.

Houston we have a problem.


The only way to solve this is to assume time speeds up closer to gravity, like the Sumerian Hall of Records also shows. The hyper-accurate starcharts in the ancient records were finally able to be verified by NASA in the 1970's. Could it be that gravitational frequency resonance affects the measurements of the atomic clocks used to test GR, as stated toward the beginning of this post? To be clear, I have no issue with Special Relativity, only with General Relativity where two atomic clocks are BOTH at rest at different elevations on the surface of the planet.

However, notice, at higher altitudes, there is faster speed involved. And so there still has not been any test of General Relativity, but it is still a test of Special Relativity!



Zero time is also infinite time. As shown in the book "The Edge of Infinity" by Paul Davies, the event horizon of a black hole is a perfect zero frozen time; and upon crossing that horizon, ALL of time of the infinite universe passes by at that moment, and one enters a pure system of light -- simultaneous infinity. 

However that is operating under the assumption of General Relativity's claim, meanwhile violating several well-known and observed conditions of the universe. The event horizon means no information can escape and return out into the universe. But, as we have seen from Bob Lazar's experiment with ET gravity engines at the top of the Home page, light still shines because light is independent of time. Furthermore, X-rays and high-frequency energy particle fountains flow from a Black hole, violating the conditions of General Relativity's claim. How can there be ANY high frequency particles when time, at the event horizon is at the lowest frequency possible, zero, meanwhile upon crossing it, time suddenly reverses to infinite time passing all at once?

The event horizon is due to the "tipping" of the light cone to where one edge is straight up and down, whereas X (space) = 0, and time (Y) = infinity. But as one travels into the "gravity well" of a black hole, the pilot will continue to travel and travel and travel, chasing that zero time barrier, and never catching it because it is always just over the event horizon.

To explain a light cone: from a point of origin of turning on a light bulb, light moves through time and space on a rectilinear coordinate graph at a 45 degree angle as the light travels through space, and takes time to travel that space (traveling through space and time). 2-D space curves (like a ball of weight on a flexible rubber sheet, making a dent, or a well because of the ball's weight), and as the Y axis is always perpendicular to the X axis, at a certain point where space is curved at a 45 degree angle, the light from the origin no longer escapes out into space at all. It goes straight up along the Y axis, not traveling any distance in space.


At the point where time is a zero, there should not be any space! The ratio of X/Y is undefined when Y = 0. If there is no space, then time is at a zero, but actually the "edge of infinity" is because light cannot travel anywhere out in space, but it can take all the time in the universe to try. That Y axis, any movement parallel to the Y axis away from the gravity well is infinity. Infinity is common in mathematics. As a curve on a graph always approaches the Y axis infinitely but never touching it, is indeed a common condition of a mathematical limit. So time becomes infinite, and space becomes zero -- NO SPACE AT ALL. That is the condition of light itself, which has no time, or rather, all time happens all at once.


There are two logical possibilities (actually three): The data of the atomic clocks was falsified, or gravitational frequency resonance increases the clock-rate. Out of every two possibilities, there's always a third. All things are in motion. The ONLY place we can test General Relativity is upon the Earth, where everything is in constant motion at the same rate, relative to the planet itself. Measuring at sea level, and measuring on top of Mt. Everest, the frequency of time is slower at sea level but NOT due to the effects of gravity at all, but instead due to the frequency differences of magneto-electrostatic energy fields, and only relative to Earth! If we get far enough away from Earth, the time frequency should start to become slower again because of the dissipation of Earth's static field of electro-inertial energy. Dissipation is the wrong word. Less-concentrated and less-dense are better words.

When we get farther away from the Earth, Special Relativity applies more than General Relativity.





By now it should be seen the differences, and how gravitational time zones actually work, if you have read the Home page, parts of the Warp Drive News page, and the Starship Relativity post below (and maybe the engineering pages) ... enough to give one a good idea of the functioning and relationships of time and space and gravity and frequency.

There's a lot of data to sort through and study, but I believe it's worth it, to get a better idea of how starships operate. 





SOLUTION REVEALED!!!!!



Here's the situation with General Relativity. An atomic clock is at sea level, and an atomic clock is on top of Mt. Everest. The clock goes faster at Mt. Everest. Why?

Simple! If a wheel is spinning on a rod or drive shaft, the speed is slower closer to the center of the circle. Out along the outer edge of the wheel, the speed is faster to keep up. Make sense?

The speed of the rotation of Earth along sea level is at a certain speed, around 2,000 miles per hour if memory serves. But, a GPS satellite affixed over that location in high Earth orbit must travel much faster to keep up with that affixed spot on the ground. It's like if your friend is on a merry-go-round and is spinning around, and he is holding one end of a 20 foot pole, and you are holding the other end, then if you are 20 feet away from that merry-go-round, you'd really have to run super fast to keep up with his motion.

So it is not General Relativity that is being measured with the atomic clocks at Sea level, and at high elevation. It's SPECIAL Relativity!

The best way to test for General Relativity to show time speeds up closer to gravity is to get in a fast jet that can travel faster than 2,000 miles per hour, and fly from East to West (the Earth's rotation spins from West to East) at the same rate that Earth spins. The jet can hold a relative fixed location in altitude as the Earth spins out from under the Jet. The pilots of the Jet would see the sun always sitting in the same place in the sky, but see the Earth moving very rapidly below. Conditions like this HAVE been tested, and they really DO show that time is faster in this condition, but ONLY relative to a stationary spot on the ground, like an airport or another jet parked at an airport, and unfortunately, that stationary spot on the ground is rotating with the Earth.

The only true way to test for General relativity is to have two super-fast jets, one at high altitude, and one at low altitude, traveling at the rate of speeds which makes the two jets always directly in alignment with each other. The pilot in the lower jet can look up and always see the second jet right where it is, and the sun right where it is. Each jet carrying an atomic clock could then compare the rate of time difference, directly as it pertains to gravity alone, and not due to motion alone, as in the case of Special Relativity.

The lower jet should show a faster rate of time than the top jet. Well, actually since the top jet is having to travel a little faster, then it is in a higher frame of acceleration, and thus having a higher frequency of gravity time, and so its clock must run a little faster, actually. So the lower jet should have a slower rate of time, and the upper jet a faster rate of time, due to acceleration within relative gravity conditions of Earth.


But that shows the Equivalence between acceleration and gravity. And also it shows the relationship between frequency and gravitytime. Higher frequencies of gravitytime have faster clock-rates. This means that close to the sun, due to the higher acceleration frame of its gravity alone, the clock should tick faster. 


The jet above has a faster rate of time in relative acceleration with Earth Gravity Field, and it is based upon the Earth Gravity Field, acceleration relative to it. The The clock tick-rates of the jets are relative with Earth's gravitational frequency. 


And so, time speeds up closer to gravity, and slows down farther from gravity, as a rule of thumb involving relative frequencies of gravitytime (which also includes acceleration rates within relative fields of gravitation -- recall "gravitation" from the "Gravitational Resonance" post above). However that also MUST involve relative changes of speed and motion (Special Relativity) as well, since everything is in motion, and it is the frequency of motion and gravity which is the fabric of time and space!

That way, all the physics work like they are supposed to, and General Relativity is not in any violation with any other theories of known physics that can be observed for accuracy and validity. But even better! We can build hyperdrives, warp drives, light drives, and fly to another star, and return home in time for dinner.


Expansion and contraction of space concept in the post "Gravitational Resonance" and in the "Inflation of Space" section at the bottom of the Warp Drive News page certainly predict such a condition of gravitational frequency relativity mathematically (Alcubierre), and engineered as the X-1 engine. The condition that time speeds up closer to a gravitationally massive body generally is an integral component and aspect of interstellar transportation physics.

In the negative energy model, a negative energy warp bubble is the result of accelerating fields of gravitation. It seems the universe is a natural paradox that applies generally in deep space, but paradoxically (specially) in stellar space (in a star's stellar capacitor of gravitation).


It is now a logical possibility that Nibiru (Marduk), the planet mentioned in the Sumerian Hall of Records can really have a time dilation ratio of 1 : 3600 years when two factors are taken into consideration: Distance from the Sun's gravity, and speed of Nibiru's orbit, either in the same direction of Earth or in the different direction of Earth's orbit. For such a huge gap, Nibiru would have to be traveling in an orbit in the opposite direction of Earth's orbit, and be a considerable distance from the Sun at its highest peak of relative time dilation.

To be clear, that ratio 1 : 3600 years actually refers to planetary orbits rather than such an extreme time dilation. In fact, that is how a Shar (the 3600 year difference) was determined, is to be the actual time of Nibiru's orbit (called the "Tablet of Destiny" in the Records). However, the time dilation is unrevealed, but it should be known that there is an extreme time dilation involved. In one case of an ET contact situation, the ET had said a window of 3 days was all that was allowable to spend any time on Earth, due to the time dilation of the distance and speeds (general and special relativity) involved.





So to recap:       Gravity-time is inertial frequency


We can derive these simple laws:

The faster something goes, as a rule of thumb, the faster it's time frequency, because it is in a higher accelerated frame of gravity-time. A jet traveling near Earth has a higher gravitytime frequency than rocket out in deep space traveling at the exact same speed. That is also dependent on if the rocket is traveling in the same direction, or opposite directions; and since the Earth is round and spins, a jet will have a higher acceleration curve then a rocket at the same speed traveling in a straight line.

Any change in inertial mass of an object also proportionately changes a field of gravity of that object.

The higher the inertial mass, the higher the frequency in both space, and time.

Likewise, the higher the gravity field, the higher the frequency in both space, and time.



So out in deep space away from gravity fields, time is slower and distance is longer and frequency is lower (see the comment on this post).



How this applies:


Traveling at the speed of light (roughly) incurs a tremendously higher gravitytime frequency (more inertial mass). This then appears that Earth time is much slower, just barely creeping along. The ship can fly to Alpha star and back, without much time actually passing on Earth, both according to the pilots, and to the people on Earth.

A ship that uses a hyperdrive can fly to a distant star much faster, not taking much time at all to actually arrive there. The ship can fly to Alpha and return to Earth, and not much time on Earth has passed.


On the condition that the hyperdrive actually lowers the gravity and inertial mass of the ship, yet increases the frequency of time due to the co-counter rotating electrical inertia (electrogravity) of a ship engine, then the ship can travel faster than light, particularly when a propulsive gravity force is used that increases as mass decreases (tacyhon).

Since the frequency of time is increasing purposefully, then not only can the ship travel to Alpha Centauri very rapidly, measured in times of seconds, minutes, and days rather than years, but the ship will also be able to return to Earth without much time having passed on Earth at all. 

The engine and energy geometry of the starship engines can be re-vitalizing to a pilot's health as seen in some experiments using electromagnetic Rodin votex (interference wound) coils, and perhaps even incur a biological regeneration ability beyond what the Human can do alone.




As stated on the home page, an increase of resonance also increases the frequency. Such an increase of resonance upon the field of matter itself, using magneto-electrostatic co-counter-rotating inertia, increases the frequency of the matter-field of the vibrating space of the energy field of the ship's fractal atomic structure (matter-energy space).

An increase of frequency of energy resonance, while phasing out the inertial forces of acceleration, also lowers the energy phase of mass and gravitation, while increasing a frequency of matter-space.

The frequency of time itself is increased because the spaces between each moment of inertia are reduced in co-counter acceleration (Acceleration = Gravitation).

A monopole of charged magneto-static inertial force (which includes the mass-wave of that force as particles of mass-force), creating a gravity-time well in the center of the vortex on one side only also increases the resonance of frequency at the central accumulator and throughout the rotational systems. 




The relation of the mass-gravitation wave going to zero while time approaches infinity is a similar mechanism to a transformation between electrostatic and electromagnetic waves, as electromagnetic waves are un-polarized (phased to zero in co-counter spin) in pure electrostatic fields.

It does not imply that time and space (time and mass, or frequency and gravitation) is inverse in relationship to each other. It implies that each can be transformed just as electrical force and magnetic force can each be isolated in energy-form.  







See: "Keep In Mind (Tacyon Drive Mechanics)" at the bottom of the Tesla Engineering Physics page.

Updated    3/30/15



I've altered the content a bit of this post. There is additional rambling below this immediate addition, but it has become known that General and Special relativity is not in conflict with one another, and the unity is seen in starship relativity. The above is a spacetime relativity diagram. The below helps one to interpret what's going on there. Keep in mind, the universe is 12 dimensional (most pleasing shape: 3 + 4 = 7 ...  3 x 4 = 12 ... 7 x 2 = 12 which is due to a 12-pointed geometry around a wheel; one half the circumference will have 7 points  ..... ... and 7 + 2 = 9 as the Densities of Consciousness); and the image above (the Relativity Diagram at the top) is only TWO dimensional ...




Speed, moving fast and faster clock ticks, is equivalent to gravitational force, which is equivalent to a force of mass, at rest..  but can mass really truly be at rest? To simply things, it's easy to reference the object-location of a sphere of mass like a planet as to how much spacetime it is warping. ....  Tesla never believed in curved space.

The relativists would say that time slows down because a massive body dents the curve of space. As space (x-axis) curves down, then the right angle of time as the Y axis also must stay right angles to the surface of that curve. So away from that gravity pocket, we look across a flat plane, and it starts to take longer in time to look, because the Y axis of time is now lengthened. That's Euclidean geometry only, however. A mere 2 dimensions.

Granted, theoretically, if in 2 dimensions then it can be expanded infinitely into any dimensions. A^2 + B^2 +C^2 +D^2 +E^2 ... =  Z^2 .... etc ad infinum .....

But, Tesla argued differently. Only from a flat plane of rotation can the gravity of something seen to be more at rest. The more you start to orbit the spacetime dent of the planet, you make ripples in the lake yourself! The two theories work together because a faster frequency of gravitation (gravity-time) can relatively slow that time down.

Yet, there is no contradiction between general and special relativity.

That applies to being in the center of an Outer Ring drive that time would slow way down. On the other hand, time would be slow around the outside of the Outer Ring drive. How's that for weird. It's actually in reverse. Time slows down INSIDE THE GRAVITY FIELD, allowing for more time to pass, because it's going slower.

Slow time is due to longer waves; however, it's due to the shorter waves of time in frequency acceleration that makes for more time to happen (to flow; to pass; to exist) in the gravity field!

There's no contradiction! It's just a different point of view! It adds up to the same thing!

Sure enough!


It's a matter of perspective. If on the outside of the field, we can see that space is indeed curved, and so the Y-axis of time is faster and brought to a cone shape inside the spacetime dent. That means, that if the direction of the flow of time is up the Y axis, then a whole lot more time passes, and even comes to a point of where all time converges, much closer in the future (instead of infinite time passing straight up the Y). We never see the point where the cone tip touches and converges, but can look into the future to where it does. As we are traveling up the Y axis, it's always that curve that remains the same from one moment to the next, we never actually move faster in time on the outside of the gravity warp then the observer's current rate of "time flow" at rest and not close enough to have to orbit the planet.

Also, light from an event from the inverted cone intersection of time with space traveling at a 45 degrees actually is almost traveling in the same axis as space, nearly parallel to the x axis (parallel to the X axis of space, light travels in space without taking any time). Light from an event some distance away in curved space arrives arrives many times faster to the worldline of Y Prime, in time.

A light event from worldline Y Prime (a light bulb turns on and travels in space taking time to reach a distance), with an angle of 45 degrees from the origin of Y Prime arrives at one of the "legs" of the inverted cone at nearly the same time it left, not traveling very far in time, but traveling much farther in space. The inverted cone in the diagram is of course the Y axis of space, as space is curved.

That definitely shows that time is faster inside the gravity warp, and shows that it is cone-shaped along-with a curved parabola. 

It just takes longer in time to see into where the faster time rate occurs, observing from in deep space to the far left.

I'll be darned! Special Relativity and General Relativity both say the same thing then, that time really does speed up closer to gravity, it just slows down momentarily directly prior to a faster rate of time frequency "flow". 

This certainly has applicability for a starship engine, such as an Outer Ring drive like what NASA is trying to build.


Also it helps explain the nature of the event horizon of a black hole, as far as it receeding the closer you approach the black hole. I love black holes because they are rich paradoxical environments to play with! 

I want to re-emphasize that there are two ways to look at the same thing, depending upon the paradox of perspective (paradox of measurement). It further shows in the example of time both slowing down AND speeding up, that there is no wrong or right, but the truth depends upon your point of view. 

In the case of the event horizon, where light is always at a 45 degree angle to time and space, when space is curved so that the Y axis of time is at 45 degrees, then as a light event travels in time away from the gravity well, is no longer at 45 degrees, but is at 90 degrees, parallel with the Y axis of time, never crossing the axis of Y, and so the light never reaches any distance in space. Light never escapes! However if you travel into the gravity field a little ways and wait, you'll eventually see the light from the event horizon. However, according to Special Relativity, you could never see it unless you were able to warp time on your own. 

In fact,  

This is also however, explaining why we do in fact feel the pull of gravity from a black hole, and can actually be claimed, due to the curvature of space, that the gravity wave travels faster than light, in this scenario.

"The Ongoing Paradox invariably depends upon your point of view." -- Barbara Marciniak

Relativistically, The gravity event at the axis of Y Prime disappears from time (and space) in the not-too-distant future, according to the chart. That is when the ship vibrates high enough in frequency to disappear. As it so happens, that is a similar relativistic chart of a starship, as it is a black hole. However the black hole curvature tapers off to infinity, and is not a shallow bottom as is the chart above. Since a black hole's well goes to infinity, the event horizon of a black hole always recedes farther and farther from view as one enters the gravity well. This chart above therefore has to specifically apply to a starship that can travel a tad faster than light.

It also shows the existence of a negative warp bubble, and the contraction of space and the convergence of time in that sense. Where time goes to zero is the photon, and according to tachyon drive mechanics, that is what is required to jump from one point to another point in space, no matter of any distance. Any change of time also changes space; and any change of space also changes time.

In fact, you can see where the distance in curved space is jumped from one intersection of one leg of the inverted cone, to the other side, in one single moment in time. At a certain frequency of time, a distance of space can be traveled in a one-second, or simultaneous jump. Actually, a simultaneous jump is when the 45 angle of light is in parallel to the common and standard (non-curved) X-axis, so that it does not travel in time. 


However, if light speed itself is really measuring the frequency of time, then the axis of time is itself, the axis of light, and therefore must be at 45 degrees. And then POW!  ...  A BRAND NEW FORM of unified physics is born!


There are limitations to strict relativity. This chart does not represent an absolute, because it is a very limited 2 dimensional view of generally speaking, a 12 dimensional universe. It serves as a handy map, however. When dealing with frequencies, light, time, and space, whereas light measures the frequency of time, then the physics apply in the way I like to apply them, but it tends to come into conflict with Relativity a bit, and so I've had to blend these two physics the way it has been done at this website! I don't know if the blending is hyper-accurate, or how rough the blending is, but ... it really matches up and fits very well, while also allowing for more room for growth (and with not so much of a need to tear it down and rebuild it)!

I'm surprised at how well Special and General Relativity in particular really confirms the possibilities of teleportation and jump drives.


In the case of frequency relativity, space will be like a wave, with crests and troughs parallel with the X Axis, and not below the X-axis. The distance is still shrunk in space because space has to take all those bends, instead of just taking a straight line, and so it pulls space together, compressing it, and rippling it rather than denting it. 

Yet, it's the frequency of time which contracts space; rather it's not space doing the contracting but time itself. It makes for the distance between deep space and event Y Prime a quick hop, instead of a long journey. 

If you treat space as a line, and then just increase the frequencies of time, space is still a line, just a much shorter one! You can kind of see that through the worldline height of Y Prime in time. If an Event right in-line with the X axis in the time-line of Y Prime, so where the common X-axis could intersect, then the distance would still be shorter, by increasing the frequencies of time to make the origin of Y Prime up higher on the worldline height of the axis of Y-Prime.

This is also what is represented by the legs of the inverted light cone; at the frequency height along the Y Prime axis of that (second) Event, in negative time (accelerating in time to a future event)..  it is negative time from that second Event point, pulling the ship up to it. However the point of view, at the accelerated time frequency, the ship would then be at the height of the Event of the intercept of the inverted cone (the future convergence point). Then, as light is simultaneous as the 45 degree axis of time, then a simultaneous jump in space can be achieved when the frequency of the ship is vibrating at light speed.

AND, obviously the shortest distance is a straight line. As the frequencies of the ship vibration increase, it also warps space (making that bowl-shape in the image), and will pull the intercept of the future convergence closer to the Origin of Y-Prime (the Event of the starship in space).


This means that a frequency of time can be generated that resonates the ship at light speed and can make simultaneous teleportation jumps at the distance of its gravitational warp, at very rapid intervals. Obviously at the frequency of the vertical core vibrations, every 360 degree rotation (a complete wave-form), there will be a frequency-hop through space.


Again, that is why Relativity makes things kind of difficult, because there are so many different ways to look at the universe in 12 dimensions, from only a 2 dimensional image. That's why a blending of physics is important, with a lean toward the Tesla side, because, well, Einstein never did make any engines. There are many more aspects to all of this, but I feel on a whole, all the info at this website is pretty dang close, and certainly close enough to show the truth -- that we can fly to other stars and build starships to do it, and to make the journey swiftly.

Frequency (Tesla) and Geometry (Tesla and Einstein) in a blending of vibration and energy physics

. . .


And here's the best part! :

The X-1 disk is the axis of the changes of time, the Y. The vertical core is the axis of space, the X. Gravity is felt naturally as one walks around or sits in the ship. That's somewhat metaphorical. The X-1 disk is somewhat of a gravity plate, where gravity frequency is held in gravitation, standing over the disk. There are multiple paradoxes involved. Another paradox is the case of the missing OTC-X1 test ships, and Tesla's missing little test ships as they disappear, they are still there through time, but in a pocket in a parallel space. Ghosts or spirits may be able to find it easier than we could. If a signal was sent to shut the engines down somehow, we could locate the missing devices in Tesla's lab (occupying a parallel space of where the lab once was before burned down), and even in Otis's lab.

That bizarre tangent aside though, you can look at the picture above to discern a wide variety of situations.

Internal gravity is discussed in a few posts below, but for now to finish the metaphor, it can already be seen in the gravity well conditions above, that a gravity field can be held in frequency conditions, like a force-field that holds a phantom gravity field. My point is also to note the conditions of gravitation flipped on the other axis (the equator is the polar spinning axis). These are somewhat more wild avenues of thought.

The vertical core has a sheer force, and the cockpit is shielded. The Outer Ring has an internal warping frequency, but is far enough from the interior so that the cockpit is a balanced condition of frequency and force (gravitational fields). 

The historic OTC-X1 design puts the cockpit space in the inside, not directly over the rotating capacitor plates and just along the edge of the Central Accumulator. The LAU-X3 cockpit space is above the rotating X-1 disk capacitor plates, but can be inside the field of the Outer Ring, or directly above the inside field of the Outer Ring (meaning the ship would have two decks, and be much larger). 

The X-1 disk would have to extend all the way out to the Outer Ring in that condition, (so the cockpit space won't be directly over the capacitor plates). That might be the only problem, but as long as there is no direct co-counter rotation below the cockpit space, it shouldn't necessarily induce a stronger gravity field than Earth G's. Plus the crew is also isolated in an inertial bubble from the vertical core and Outer Ring drive -- the plasma motion in between the inner and outer hulls (along the inner hull space). 

The co-counter rotation applies more to electromagnetic fields, because particles of mass in accelerated motion need only be going in one way only (one direction) to achieve gravitation. 

Co-counter rotating electromagnetic and static fields however is the alternative to direct mass acceleration of particles, as a means to achieve gravitation.

So it would seem there are two differences between the LAU-X3 and the OTC-X1 as far as safe pilot places. And it now raises the question of how a gravity field can work in a surrounding "force field" of gravitation, where the pilots have to make the journey inside the ship. These are difficult questions to answer. More about that is discussed in the posts below. 


I want to stay focused on the existence of the ship for now, and the understanding of the physics required to build it. As stated, the X-1 engines create a temporal frequency displacement of increased time around the edges, and increased gravitation toward the center, the Outer Ring does the same thing, but also includes the co-counter rotation of mass-charge as accelerated plasma. The rate of frequency acceleration is similar, but a much more powerful force in the Outer Ring due to the plasma.

That central zone of cockpit space inside the Outer Ring plane is also somewhat of a field of an accelerated space, lessening the "impact" of the X-1 gravitational forces, AND allowing for there to be a way for artificial gravity to be generated not by a frequency difference above the capacitors, but by a movement of inertial displacement toward the center. Not all of these are sheerable forces, but also transverse and parallel forces.

The one interesting thing about electrostatic energy is the parallel force it has in the manner not transversely!

That is to say the vertical core creates a downward flow of gravity from top down, at the same force around the vertical core, but the parallel pull of downward gravity is lessened the further away from the vertical core. Parallel Gravity is that concept in a similar way of staking down four posts (perhaps on some little asteroid with hardly any gravity) in a square that creates the same gravity pull down, all throughout the square, say of a comfortable force of Earth gravity.

Relative deceleration forces can apply between the lower X-1 and bottom plasma flow toward the outer ring also in parallel to balance out the forces of gravity.

That's not implying that if you don't turn the right dial at the right speed as another dial that it's going to crush the pilots into goo on the ceiling or floor within a super strong gravity field! That's not implying that at all!  

Besides, these fields may affect organic matter differently. Maybe the pilots would have to wear special organic flight suits, or something, or maybe "flying commando style."

That's really the only unknown about all of this. I would not worry though, about the ship being crushed in its own gravitation. 



The pilot cockpit space is actually a null-gravity zone the way the engines are designed to focus on the center and the outer edge. Also there is a inner inertial displacement in the central accumulator along with an inner-to-outer force of expansion due to the outward plasma flow from the bottom of the vertical core, only to be made back into an inner accumulation again as the plasma returns from the outer edge to the inner core (at the top of the ship). So those particular polarities reverse once, and it might very well be a more neutralizing effect for safe pilot conditions.

This strange condition diverts inertial force back out to the outer edge of the X-1 (through the plasma flow out the bottom of the vertical core, and over the top of the X-1 outer co-rotating shell), giving a further range of acceleration back out to the edge, only to raise the resonance of the edge itself, so the whole system resembles two toroids stacked on top of each other, the upper toroid field shape flowing top down, inside, then back outside again, and the lower toroid field shape flowing inversely, but again outside through the inside plane to the central accumulator which is over-charged with inertial frequency from the vertical core.

The overall double-toroid shape can inscribe the two tetrahedrons moved through each other as Nassim Haramein describes in his "Black Whole" video.

These are complex field dynamics that do more to complicate the issue of if there is internal gravity or not for the pilots. An independent gravitation field would suggest no onboard gravity at all for the pilots, but it can also suggest that the gravity field of when the engines are turned on is somehow held in stasis. Ralph Ring felt gravity and could walk around in the OTC-X1. Independent gravitation is an easy answer though, to a complex issue of if the ship will pull acceleration g-forces taking fast 90 degree turns. The answer is of course not, the pilots won't be squished like that because the pilots are in an independent gravity field. The only question though, is in an independent field, why does it not neutralize the gravity for the pilots instantly when the engines are turned on and the ship levitates? 

Obviously the ship levitates, it doesn't continue to fly upwards. It hovers over the ground. We can assume that flying in an independent field, at that point, the ship can go anywhere, even though separate electrogravity charged flight surfaces can be used separately. So there must be some interaction with gravity and charge and frequency and resonance. Resonance is the highest dimension of thought, in that the concepts of resonance are more innately known to the mind (like probabilities) than angular vectors and velocities and all that mechanical stuff which only creates the resonance field. The resonance field itself is what we want to know about.

When the resonance field-action is understood as "what the fields do," then the identity of "what they are and how they work" are the next logical progressions. It's just a matter of narrowing down the possibilities, and putting them into perspective. ... There are a lot of possibilities as far as that goes. How do the INTERNAL fields apply internally to the ship? Would it be a hurricane of swirling gravity, or would it be the calm in the Eye of the hurricane? 


The X-1 uses the frequencies of time more-so than the particle flow using the energies of space. See, this is what I'm talking about "Philadelphia Experiment." As long as the vertical core engine is not engaging a plasma force, and the Outer Ring drive is in operation, then the forces from the X1 horizontal disk are in effect, to whatever that effect is, in the pilot cockpit area, and the Outer Ring amplifies the frequency field and must at least use some of the vertical core to conduct that charge to the Central Accumulator. Normal gravity should be felt where ever the ship can go, because there is no reason to assume that zero gravity would occur in the cockpit in an independent gravity field warp bubble, based on pilot testimony.

When the vertical core is engaged, and the plasma forces flow, a new bubble would form around the cockpit, but it would be balanced inertially through the vortex structure. Again, there is no clear indication of ANY change of on-board gravity in the cockpit area to assume that the pilots would even feel any gravity forces at all. But perhaps it is that distinction alone -- that no distinction can be made other than pilot testimony.

And so on that note, it's logical to assume there will be a nice comfortable on-board gravity environment for the pilots in organic flight suits anywhere and at any time the ship is in operation, and is in fact, a very protective environment from any hazardous conditions in space (including heavy gravity conditions), so as long as the engines are running as a protective shield around the pilots.

Perhaps it is because the utron tips are pointed up into a 45 degree angle, converging at one point, that can explain the left-over unknown aspects of gravitational resonance, further adding to the dimensions of action of angular inertia. 

... And also keep in mind that changing the frequencies of either time, OR space, will alter the frequencies of the other. As space compresses, so does time. If the frequencies of time get shorter, distance is also shortened. 


. . .


So as a general re-cap to that top portion . . . 

. . . a relativity chart in 2 dimensions can be looked at in a few different ways. One of the reasons I held off on the complex relativity was, aside for the obvious reasons, I'd have to come up with a different way to show things when taking into account that light itself measures the frequency of time, and otherwise light is itself simultaneous! It was NEVER clear to me how relativity came up with the idea of light being the 45 degree angle between time and space other than it was just an assumption that light measured time and space in that fashion. 

I learned in college long ago that according to the actual experience of the photon, if a laser was shined from here to Mars, according to the photon, it would arrive the very moment it left without taking any time, but we see it taking time because we have mass. That gets into the photon taking both paths around the star, etc.

And that really makes a LOT of sense in relativity. It is essentially the very reason we have warp drive physics and theory at all. I never understood how a tachyon could even exist, until I put it into perspective with frequency, light, and mass, as seen in a hyperdrive engine. Then I understood it. Teleportation is possible because light has those simultaneous characteristics. So what does this say about Relativity?

Frequencies can determine the wave and time characteristics of Relativity, and even explain Inflation and the inner dynamics of a gravity warp, where each of these different aspects of physics each expresses different dimensions of the universe. When these different principles of physics are brought together in unity, then certain aspects of physics overlap, and can even appear as a mirror image; and the geometry of the quantum vacuum starts to be seen more deeply clearly as it applies to the physical universe. 

Time is the frequency of space, taken into account gravitation, charge, mass, etc. That's why light measures the frequency of space, and is not at a 45 degree angle between time and space, otherwise light would be a separate aspect of frequency alone and would be part of the universe, rather than the unity of mass in the universe. Light does not depend upon time, otherwise there would not be teleportation, and twin particles wouldn't be simultaneous in their actions.

That's also why time and gravity can't be considered "particles." A gluon is considered a particle when it is merely a gravitational force of attraction overcoming an electric static charge of repulsion.



There is finally, one last way to look at that relativity graph. It looks that space itself is expanded around a gravitational source, being that space becomes the hypotenuse of light and time. Then we would have to say it is not light that is red-shifting, but it is space itself! -- Accelerating Within. As a star moves away from everything else, the time frequency stretches, although the star never really goes away from everything, just the same as to say everything looks like it is moving away from everything, but everything tends to stay where it is, perpetually moving away in the same place it was, and where it will be. That's the pull of gravity.

So it can be seen relatively, that space is not expanding. Gravity sources are expanding within themselves! 

We have complicated math to draw simple conclusions like this; yet the math seems to solve the conflicts of "which is right, and which is wrong" -- true or false. But it fails to make the distinction on if it is real or illusion. An illusion can be true, at least until another illusion comes along that is equally as true. What is real, and what is true, is relative, and paradoxical.



Now it can be seen that time slows down at gravity forces, and accelerates within. That slower time flows as a faster slow-time, the more it approaches the gravitational origin. That is a paradox. That is the mechanism upon the quantum vacuum itself. As a gravity source sucks itself in more and more, where the gravity is strongest closest to the source, it pulls harder! That stretches time even more. 

As long as we can look at the universe in a particular way that makes sense on all levels, including the negative space of The Interior-Universe, then a true unified perception of the logic of paradoxical unification (geometries of light) can exist.


. ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ .


These are the original ramblings below, pending an edit in the future:


. . .


When an object travels at a fast speed, Special relativity can apply. But a starship is always in a field of acceleration, and not merely just a rock hurdling through space at the constant velocity.

A starship is very different. It travels in a faster gravitytime frequency, and its time frequency is also accelerated. I don't think it is Relativity that defines the starship's movements, because a starship behaves differently and uniquely.

Satellites are in their own fields of acceleration relative with the Earth. GPS satellites which hold a fixed position relative with Earth is in a different relative frame of gravity (acceleration -- due to the circular/curved orbit instead of a linear trajectory) and time than satellites or near-orbit spacecraft like the space shuttle or ISS (International Space Station) that move in a closer orbit.

I almost regret going heavy into concepts of Relativity as it pertains to the information on this website, because it does more to confuse the issues I want to show, which is only dealing with one thing, and one thing only: how to keep the time while moving between stars, IN A STARSHIP.

To those ends, it's rather simple. 

And the OTC-X1 makes things even simpler because of the inertial phasing of inertia, and expansion into a wide range of possible location. 

What doesn't make sense is the notion that the faster one travels (with a limit upon the speed of light), the slower one actually goes (speed is a factor of time and distance).

Simply put, mass increases as the massive object approaches the speed of light. That's the most important thing, a way to increase mass (thus gravity). The X-1 takes those accelerated massive frames and has something huge to work with, but phases out a large force of gravity to act independently through space and time.

General and Special relativity though, doesn't really deal with frequencies. That makes it less compatible with Tesla physics and engineering (dealing with frequency and vibration), which would seem to easily violate relativity, and make relativity become paradoxical. General and Special relativity deals with geometry more than frequency.

Tesla physics is common sense, though. But it is increasingly difficult for the mind of a well-trained Relativistic scientist to grasp these notions of gravity as frequency fields of time and space, which is mass energy of inertial fields, which is also fields of acceleration (inertial mass; gravity).

The notion that if time speeds up, distance is shortened is paradoxical geometry, however, dealing with frequencies. An accelerated frame of time and space means that time and space are both at a higher frequency, and likewise at a higher gravity.

That's why I keep coming back to the notion that time is accelerated closer to gravity. An object that is not in a frame of acceleration is moving in a straight line, but any curved path an object takes is at a rate of acceleration, mathematically. Gravity is acceleration. If a car takes a sharp turn to the right, and there is a helium balloon inside the car, the balloon will travel to the right side of a car, toward the curve, going against the G-force that throws the driver to the left.

I tossed out doing the math on Relativistic equations long ago because I kept running into conflicts and negations, and nothing that was rock solid that could be applied as a law of physics that worked every single time without fail. Even GPS satellites are very imprecise, and I feel it's not because the math is wrong, but that our understanding of the universe is incomplete. 

By now though, more people are accepting the principle of Equivalence (acceleration = gravity), which is a load off my mind.

An object in acceleration cannot exceed the wave-propagation of its own energy. Light speed is the speed of wave-propagation in a vacuum. Electromagnetic waves at transverse are at the speed of 186,000 miles per second, and electrostatic waves in parallel are at 220,000 miles per second. These speeds WILL change throughout the universe, in different gravity-time fields, though. These speeds are the speed of the mass of our solar system, the speed of Earth gravity as Earth travels around the sun. An object cannot travel faster than it's mass-wave can propagate, explaining why a massive object (no matter how big or small) cannot exceed the "speed of light."

It's common sense.

Starships can move faster than light because of many factors: gravity/mass wave resonance, spacetime resonance, gravity neutralization (like the electromagnetic wave is not present in a pure electrostatic energy because the EM wave is co-counter spinning, phased to zero; any electromagnetic wave has a spin in one direction, not both at once). Gravity neutralization is a similar phasing-to-zero of the inertial-mass wave generated by the ship, making it become like a big photon.

It's common sense!

It's not even difficult, so why do people keep getting confused, it's so simple!

A faster rate of acceleration of spacetime is a heavier gravity! That's very simple. That means that time is faster, mass is greater, gravity is stronger.

Time deals with frequency, so as the frequencies of acceleration become more accelerated, it is not logical to assume that frequency (time) slows down, when it is speeding up!

In a faster frequency of spacetime, time is faster, gravity is stronger, mass is greater. How can we measure it? Easy! With something else that can be used as a constant. Light isn't even a constant, neither are electromagnetic and electrostatic wave propagation speeds, because it all deals with frequencies. The frequency of our solar system mass/gravity/time is different than other star systems which can be higher or lower.

Actually light is a constant, but not measurable in our universe. Only things in the universe can be measured with other things in the universe. Something without any space and time cannot be measured in a universe of space and time, and make any sense at all.

We'd have to get into metaphysics to deal with that measurement, and philosophy. 

Actually, Light as unity IS the universe, but the universe of space and time is a paradox. A paradox of what? All paradoxes unify. A paradox of light! That's WHY light measures space and time most excellently, because it is common to all matter in the universe, even though light exists without space or time.

A concept of travel to another star cannot even be grasped if we are treating starships like rocks or other inert objects. A starship is highly sophisticated! General and Special relativity cannot really be applied very effectively at all with starship physics. Tesla physics, dealing with frequencies, energy, vibration, now THAT applies.

I'm very sorry to disappoint so many Relativistic scientists on that note, but I just cannot accommodate you very efficiently. I keep going back to the same basic thing: gravity-time is a frequency of inertial fields of mass, like star systems and galaxies. Because of that, Tesla physics don't break apart gravity and time and space like Relativity does. Tesla physics treats space, time, and gravity as a unified field!

Because of that, Starship physics is radically different than General and Special relativity. Try as I may, I can't cram relative physics in with starship physics and have it make ANY sense whatsoever, and those difficulties are clearly seen on this website from where I DID try to accommodate Relativists in an effort to prove this technology works, and so we can start building it.

And in an attempt to over-simply these physics, I may have implied something moving very fast incurs a time dilation, but that should be cleared up right here and now, the difference between linear travel, and travel in a curved path. E = mc^2 is the relation of energy to acceleration. Something falling from a tall sky-scraper building will be accelerating and building up velocity, and all objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum. Earth gravity is what ..  off the top of my head around 9.8 meters per second squared? 

Anything moving at a constant speed, but traveling in a circle also fits with the standard equation f = ma^2 (force = mass x acceleration) squared. E = mc^2 is in the same standard form relating gravity with acceleration and inertial energy (inertial mass). 

I expect people to grasp THAT. But I don't expect people to necessarily be schooled in calculus. I love calculus, but I haven't practiced it in a while because I've mainly been dealing with geometry like E = mc^2, and other simple equations that are more Sacred Geometry than anything else. Sacred Geometry really is the shape of the universe itself. When we know that shape, then we can travel to other stars very easily, and that's ALSO the point of this website, is to show how easy it all can be!

There are only a few things to really know as Laws of physics concerning starships. But honestly the time calculations of Relativity throws infinite hurdles into any attempt to build starships, because one will not build a starship if one does not believe it can be done.



Furthermore, the GPS satellites are supposed to compensate for Relativity, but are inaccurate in some cases as much as 50 feet. If we need to know how much time dilation a starship incurs, then it should be tested and an equation fitted with those measurements of testing it first. If there were a way to calibrate GPS satellite clocks, instead of tuning them before launching, then we could get ultra precise, by making measurements and adjustments on the fly. 

Engines are going to be different in their outputs, their RPM's, and in other ways, which means that no two engine is going to be totally the same in how it affects time. Engineering should be what determines these time dilation calculations, NOT physics.


I cannot make it any simpler without really screwing it up.



A gravity lens though, I do want to discuss a bit, here.

Why does it bend light to magnify distant galaxies like a telescope optic; and why does a gravity lens bend light around a star so that we see a planet behind the sun which SHOULD be obscured from view, actually appearing off to one side of the star?

It is because of the gravity frequency. Time and space behaves as an optic lens, but there's much more going on than that. When we deal with gravity-time frequencies, we're dealing with paradoxes. Time is a huge paradox. Time is what separates matter into matter-paradoxes, otherwise everything would all be unified light.

Space and Time is one field. If space is shortened, it takes less time. If time is shortened, the distance is less. Ultra simple.

Gravity may not actually bend space and time after all. Gravity may actually be spacetime FREQUENCIES.

In fact, that's what Tesla knew. Tesla didn't believe in curved space theory.

As the frequency of time increases, to conceptualize time as a wave, then there are less spaces between each moment. Acceleration of frequency brings mass closer to light, not farther apart.

It's painfully obvious to me that a curved space screws up everything. The Human mind considers space curved because the Human mind is typically only thinking in 2 dimensions of Euclidean geometry (look it up if you don't know what Euclidean geometry is). All of our math is calculating gravity and space and time in 2 dimensions. I'm SORRY, but that is truly crippling for a true comprehension.

Simply put, if you want to see a distant galaxy closer and don't have appropriate magnification of a telescope, put a massively huge star in between you and the distant galaxy, so that star can warp the distance and literally pull space closer, so the distant galaxy can be seen more up-close. That is a simple warp drive -- a Gravity lens. Simply put, the space corridor between star (A) and star (B) is lengthened due to gravitational pull of the stars. The space on the back side of the farthest star (while in orbit around the closest star) is contracted due to gravity's pull (space has a higher frequency over the same distance, making it take less time to travel the gap). Universal/Gravitational Mechanics rather than "special dynamics."

People don't believe the simple. But, people also make simple things way too over-complicated. Performing calculus on flat space which belongs in a realm of Algebra is making things too overly complicated.



I'm very sorry that this website is far too over-abundant with way too much information, but I really have to throw in the complex things so people can start to learn on their own and take notes, and put things together in their minds, and sort out the truth, because if it's too simple, it won't be believed.

I'm going to leave what I wrote about Relativity up on the home page, and on the Warp Drive News page, not to confuse people, but so that people can see the true depth of everything involved. I've seen people come up with crystal clear understandings of the universe, only to totally discard that when something new crosses their mind that puts them in conflict. And then, they forget all about that crystal clarity they had, not even remembering when and what they were crystal clear about.

I hashed it out a bit on the Construction Blog page, but that page has other purposes, including to show the difference about how frequency physics applies, and how Relative physics apply. 

If you can see the difference, then perhaps you can understand. But keep in mind that the overly-complex parts just describes how over-complex things can get. But the goal is to not over-complicate anything, but see the truth as simply as it actually is. I think this website will also help people teach themselves how to study. 

A warp drive cannot even be considered real, unless one can understand Gravity Lensing.

Look at the warp drive philosophy page at all those spaceships, and follow the link to see all those hundreds of color photos, and just look up in the night sky every now and then and watch those objects flying around. Observe how they fly. Some fly around the Earth again and again and again and again. You can watch them moving across the whole sky, wait a moment, and then here they come again, wait a moment, and here they come again.

If I may be so bold, this is what *I* would do: I'd build the ship and then test it. Fly it around the solar system. Test it. Measure it. Until we can do that, there will be endless bickering about if something is true or false, or even real. It's not too expensive to build unless you want to use exotic materials. 

This entire website shows that if we build the ship, it COULD work! There is more then enough information and verification to show that it is not just some random idea.

If we can't build these ships to test them and have a little fun with them, then why can't we; THAT should be the only question, not "oh, it violates special relativity and shouldn't be funded." 

I'm not going to push that philosophical issue of "why" because that would be another website just as vast as this one. There are many other people's websites that are full of those reasons why and why not. There may very well be huge reasons why.




To Recap:


General and special relativity makes calculations upon curved space in 2 dimensions. That is why the math shows that time is slower closer to gravity. 

Dealing with Tesla physics, with an understanding of unified field frequency, time is seen to speed up closer to gravity.


The two should compliment each other, not come into conflict with one another.


So, there it is. Starship relativity. General and Special relativity deals with rocks in motion. Starship relativity deals with complex and sophisticated engines in motion, also in motion with the universe. 





See also: "Warp Drive Physics" just above the big picture of the schematics at the top of the Home Page.

                                                                                                                                       updated (3/2/15)


Conventional warp drive theory depends upon negative energy. But the LAU-X3 is non-conventional. It does not rely upon negative energy ... or at the very least it uses physics of paradoxical unification rather than physics of mass-reduction. Increasing mass also may be helpful for the relative gravity-time conditions between star systems. A unity of paradoxes handles those things in an "exotic" style of unified physics (not opposite to a physics of mass-reduction, but also including those physics of mass reduction, AND mass increasing). There is nothing to fear; this is quite innocent. I realize many of you, upon seeing the word "negative" become terrified and that completely closes you down because of what you irrationally fear. Love is both positive and negative energies. No need to fear! Love replaces fear. Love overcomes fear. Have no worries. 




So, NASA is using negative energy in their warp drive physics, which is the conventional understanding of modern warp physics created by Alcubierre. What is negative energy? How can it be understood?

Energy, as it pertains to the universe, is shape and form, matter, mass, space and time, and cosmic substance. Negative energy therefore is something that exists outside our universe of energy.

Light is simple unity of energy as a unified zero. Light is simultaneous in regard to time and space -- unified mass, unified time, unified space, unity energy.

Negative space and negative time must also be included in a conceptual framework of negative energy.

Reminds me of the Philadelphia experiment.

Negative energy is not the same as light energy. Light energy involves application of simultaneous teleportation and information exchange at any distance, nonlocally. 

The concept of using negative energy in warp drive theory involves holding a space and shrinking it, expanding it, stretching it. For example, a basketball made to fit inside a thimble is in a negative space (relative with existing outer space measured by the speed of light).

In mathematical theory, time is not affected by these changes. Any event horizon however, is due to changes in time, not space. We couldn't see the basketball inside the thimble, but we could see the blur of the field. An event horizon that separates space only, enters a new system, and a new dimension, like a pocket.

In reality, the space of the basketball is still the same space it originally was! But to an outside observer, it appears as being smaller than before! That's what the action and application of negative energy actually represents, which lowers the mass of the basketball relative to movement in the universe, while maintaining the same mass "outside" the universe, as it were. It could be stated "inside" the universe, since a negative value is based on measurements relative with "positive" or normal universal space and time. The space can shrink to a relative zero, and any further shrinkage expands into "inner" space, which involves concepts of tesseracts and hypercubes.

Carl Sagan's work with scientists to present a viable reality for his book, "Contact," showed that both positive and negative mass near-simultaneous fluctuations must be present to maintain a stable wormhole which is the function and role of exotic matter. These things do exist in a logical mathematical reality.

Still, nothing is exceeding the speed of light, unless the mass value of a ship reaches a zero (not just a negative), which at that point/place, it becomes light itself, or rather moves through light, and is not bound by any constraints of time and distance. 

Negative energy alone cannot achieve that, because negative energy can also be conceived as substance which enters the universe through a portal (for example the negative energy values and virtual particle observations between two conductive plates positioned very close to each other, in certain quantum experiments). The balance is achieved with stable space, but any balance is due to the inherent nature of instability which results in form and shape, which are balances created in the universe.

Light can be represented as the simultaneous fluctuation of positive and negative energy, as a zero, while maintaining its energy (memory) pattern of shape and form.

That shouldn't be confusing; the reason why no mass can exceed the frequency of light, is because mass exists with a frequency of time. 

Exceeding the speed of light by using negative energy is a dimensional shift in shape (space), rather than an increase of speed (time) to reach a distant star. None-the-less, reaching the distant star using such application cannot exceed the speed of light.

Also, using negative energy allows ships to move at near light speed, without incurring a temporal difference relative with Earth time.



SOoooo.....    a warp drive may have limitations. A "hyperdrive" on the other hand, which includes a concept of hyperspace teleportation and simultaneous jumps between points in space (similar to a concept of stargates and space-folds), is a viable option of super-luminal travel to other stars.


No Thing can exceed the speed of light. What about thought? A thought isn't a thing. Thought acts nonlocally, and telepathic exchanges can occur simultaneously at any distance, much like the twin photon experiment. Energy that has no mass value (light and mind) can teleport to any point in the known universe.
Even though energy is matter and mass, certain types of energy (like light) are considered Unity.


...


The one thing that HAS to be noted here, is that in the Alcubierre drive, time IS changed! If the time is set to remain in synchronicity with Earth, then that is a unnatural, or technologically achieved change of how time works. Otherwise without a change of time, it would nonetheless take 4.3 years to reach the closest star.

That is also why a hyperdrive is the only thing that can traverse the distance. Because of the midpoint of gravity/time between stars. There needs to be something that can jump that gap. That's also a VERY important concept to understand. In relatively low time frequencies, the distance is actually much greater, because time and distance works together (space/time). Change the time frequency, the distance is changed. Change the space warp, and time too, is consequentially altered.

Even when the ship can change its spacetime warp, that change is also equally opposed at the mid-point between stars. Something must exist to jump the gap -- a "jump drive," or "hyperdrive."







references:  http://www.sfu.ca/~adebened/funstuff/warpdrive.html

(The physics and mathematics of warp drive)


And also see: "Inflation of Space Theory ... including energy and mass unity" on the Warp Drive News page.

Updated (12/09/14),  Revised (2/14/15)



What is exotic matter?


Exotic matter is matter that has simultaneous positive and negative mass fluctuations, and it is a natural room-temperature superconductor. It behaves in the way it is intended, because of a machine's design.


Take a look at mono-atomic gold, which has been seen to behave strangely, and with strange properties. Those properties include: room temperature superconductivity, the appearance of bi-location (being inside its container and simultaneously outside of its container, yet contained), positive and negative mass fluctuations, and spontaneous levetation.

Monoatomic matter is exotic matter. 

What is "mono-atomic" matter? It's simple, it's matter existing in a single state of one-atom. One proton, for example is mono-atomic. That is a hydrogen ion. It is reasonable to conclude that hydrogen ions are exotic, especially in high-volt energy states (it is action that determines what something is). Because it is a noble gas, it is usually paired. But when ionized, and stripped of their electrons, they don't pair so easily. That splitting of atomic "duality" shape is what achieves tremendous energy. Matter is not in a state of duality though, but the form of a paradox: along side, and opposite with.



Other characteristics of exotic matter is "exotic temper."

An element which has become exotically tempered, such as copper, can have a melt point of 7,500 degrees F, far beyond its normal low-temperature melt point. A scientist friend of mine has achieved these conditions using special equipment in a lab. She has duplicated some of her work to British Petroleum, specifically the ability to neutralize all radioactivity in a radioactive element, instantaneously, especially large radioactivity contained in water!

I am not including her last name due to protection. The normal scientific community is strange, and cannot except things on face value -- three independent U.S. testing labs could not believe that upon duplicating my friend's results and instantly neutralizing radioactivity in matter, that what they were observing was real. The normal scientific community does not believe in anything beyond an accepted box of cramming square pegs into round holes. 




Another type of exotic matter as stated at this website below uses technology similar to the Hutchison effect, from John Hutchison, uses microwaves to turn metal into a liquid, and is accelerated in two half circles:

http://thepromiserevealed.com/secret-technology-photo-gallery/




There are methods in conventional science that slows the entire system down to a crawl. A lot of that is due to the flow of money. Technology is power. Technology is either peace or war, depending on where the power flows, and how it is used, and under what intentions determine the course of scientific growth. 


"The English word "war" derives from the late Old English (c.1050) words wyrre and werre; the Old French werre; the Frankish werra; and the Proto-Germanic werso. The denotation of war derives from the Old Saxon werran, Old High German werran, and the German verwirren: “to confuse”, “to perplex”, and “to bring into confusion”.[5] Another posited derivation is from the Ancient Greek barbaros, the Old Persian varhara, and the Sanskrit varvar and barbara. In German, the equivalent is Krieg; the equivalent Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian words for "war" is guerra, derived from the Germanic werra (“fight”, “tumult”).[6] Etymologic legend has it that the Romanic peoples adopted a foreign, Germanic word for "war", to avoid using the Latin bellum, because, when sounded, it tended to merge with the sound of the word bello ("beautiful").[citation needed]"

Inner Peace is the ability to be at center and harmony amidst what is not chaos, because the chaos is brought into balance as motion and stillness, ... with intent.

It is a paradox.

. . .

Exotic matter does indeed exist.

Quarks are the basic building blocks of matter.

Three quarks make up a proton. An electron is a quark on it's own, but because it's standing on it's own, it's called a "lepton."

There are six possibilities for each quark to be oriented in a dimension..  six possible dimensions of orientation but will be oriented in only one way. Three quarks make up a proton, so there are 36 possible orientations of "quark-action."  In string theory, the quarks are the resonance points of the vibrating string. In theory, the higher dimensions of matter have a higher frequency, and higher resonating dimensions of action for more quarks greater than just 36. We have 36 possible quarks at our current frequency of the universe here on Earth that we experience as matter.

This picture geometry I drew shown in the photo above came from a crop circle.


It is also convenient that there are six possible orientations for electromagnetic action of a magnet in an orientation moving over a coil of wire, also in an orientation.


In Faraday's principles of magnetically induced electricity, the electricity direction and polarity is determined by the orientation of the spin of the magnetic "particles." Conventionally, it is considered electron spin alignment, but we don't get shocked from touching a magnet. It's electrically inert. Protons also can spin, and even though electricity travels only on the surface of an object, electrons are interwoven throughout the magnetic alloy or element, as protons and electrons inter-weave together to form the flower of the shape of matter itself.

So what is the magnetic force, and how is it generated permanently from the particular geometry of atoms in a magnet? 

Good question, huh? 








​

                                                                                                          updated (2/10/15)
                                                                                                    RE-updated (4/3/2015)


Electrogravity is easy!  


It's as simple as placing a positive high volt charge on one side of a sphere, and a negative high volt charge on the other side of the sphere, and the sphere moves in the direction of the positive charge. 

It can be observed the air moving around the sphere and accelerating the air molecules so that it warps spacetime (causing the sphere to move at very high speeds) as Townsend Brown demonstrated in the 1930's. The explanation may be a bit complex, but electrogravity in itself is very, very simple to achieve. "Lifters" made of balsa wood and tin foil and a string of bare wire provide the simplest demonstration.

The first time I saw a lifter was around 2002.  Check out www.americanantigravity.com



Update! Di-electrics!


In light of the new realization of Townsend Brown's work as seen on the "Updates and Design Improvements" page, some new design improvements can be made; and again, are seen to actually already be designed with that geometry in mind.

The Outer Hull plating is layered in three layers. With a technology of a di-electric medium between two charge plates, it can in fact, achieve the desired "warp drive" type of electrogravity flight possible that is being described here in this section, and on this website.

This should be considered firstly, and perhaps an additional layer of outer skin (total of four layers) should be used, to keep carbon build-ups from shorting across the gaps of the electrogravity hull plates when in an atmosphere.

With that in mind, the below portion is how Grand-daddy used to do it.



                                                                   ~ . ~ . ~ . ~





In regards to electrogravity hull plating, it has been noted the use of a ceramic skin around the ship overlaying electric charge plates. The ceramic will conduct a magnetic field, and prevent charge plates from building up carbon between the plates, shorting them out. However, having charge plates also on top of ceramic plates will also conduct magnetic fields, if they are constructed of more ferrous material.

A couple of posts below, these things are discussed more as layers of auxiliary redundant engine dynamics.

A good ship design ought to be able to test all aspects of all questions, until the answer is found, in developmental construction.

Each electric charge plate can be separated by an air space; periodic cleaning of the plates would merely be routine maintenance. 

Field permeability can be determined with more of a complex multi-faceted overlapping of materials. More plates all around the ship will increase the frequency of any energy field generated cyclically. Where the positive charge is on the ship, in opposite to the negative, in a basic concept determines which direction the craft will move. 

This type of electrical "merging" with the atmosphere of a planet can allow for ultimate maneuverability as the craft is also vibrating in a much higher frequency perhaps outside the range of the visual light spectrum.

Atmospheric braking, quick 90-degree turns, super-acceleration and speed is what electrogravity is made for. More on electrogravity is discussed below.

The power for an external electrogravity system can come from the outer ring drive alone, without engaging the vertical core while in atmosphere.

I've been working on this for the last 13 years, determining if these things are possible. According to physics, this is very easily achievable.

                                                                                                                             updated (4/9/15)

This is a separate component which is worth some consideration.

It is integral to the outer ring drive, but there is so much to consider about the outer ring drive that separate off-shoots can spring forth from it.

The secret space program, it has been said, has been working with microwaved metal to turn it into a liquid, and then accelerated electrically to electrostatic wave speed, which are parallel waves (not in transverse like electromagnetic waves) which travel at 220,000 miles per second.

I'm curious if they've ever considered co-counter spirals of exotic liquid metal, which adds a huge inertial mass component to the concept of co-counter rotating magneto-electrostatic alternating charges. Sound waves can turn water from a water hose into a square-wave pattern, and make it appear it is flowing back upwards. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uENITui5_jU


Light as a photon has zero mass, yet is a magneto-electrostatic wave. The mass component is phased to zero (two co-counter-rotating frequencies which match 180 degrees opposite to phase the mass waveform to zero).

A ship can do that, with an exotic co-counter rotating magneto-electrostatic rings of inertial forces, exactly 180 degrees out of phase, taking the ship into pure light, able to teleport anywhere. That is beyond my technological knowledge to show how it is constructed exactly, but not beyond my ability to construct one and show how I did it; but I don't have enough resources to accomplish that at the moment; and I want to hold off until more of the world is ready for it, in a basic nutshell. As long as people are criticizing this and not helping with it, it's not worth my time.

If fit around and in place of the outer ring of the LAU-X3, all that would be needed is a small counter-inertia proton stream to counter the inner rotation of the central vertical core, like a helicopter has a back vertical rotor to keep the helicopter from spinning around and around, instead of just the blades spinning round and round. 

Of course, the vertical core can be replaced entirely, too, with exotic secret space-age technology.

Humanity is lucky the OTC-X1 was built, which came from Tesla, as his legacy to Humankind. That technology survived, luckily.

So, all this stuff is good to think about, and is words upon the page. I am fairly confident though that the secret space program (http://thepromiserevealed.com/secret-technology-photo-gallery/) will be able to develop interstellar teleportation vehicles in a very short time. ... and since people have been criticizing that link, I've posted more links on the home page, just to be an ars, showing we've already been going to other star systems for a long time, now.

(updated 11/09/2014)   RE-updated (4/3/15)


This is an important consideration and question. First of all, what exactly is electrogravity? In a nutshell, it is the usage of high volt and high frequency charges to ionize and move an air or liquid or plasma medium to harness gravitational forces to move a vehicle (vessel). Typically in an atmospheric craft, the positive charge is on one end, and the negative on the other. The craft moves in the direction of the positive charge, and the air or plasma material moves toward the negative charge/pole. The air flow is a thrust, yet consequentially to its motion, creates a gravity force behind it due to an overall unified inertial field of mass at very high energy and speed. E=MC^2. 


Recently, with the new addition of the page "Updates and Design Improvements," Townsend Brown's technology came to light. That includes the "Stressing of the Di-electric" concept which includes a di-electric material between capacitor plates (positive and negative charge), to operate. With that in mind, that also adds to a new dynamic of an achievement of electrogravity. 

There are many different ways to achieve it, as seen here, yet the conditions are always the same. 

The general conditions are: time slows down all around, in the reality outside the ship's immediate space, whereas time speeds up on board, and within the ship's immediate space. No inertial G-forces are physically felt in the ship, the pilot doesn't feel the ship's motions, and won't feel any tight 90 degree angle cornering, or any sudden acceleration and deceleration. 

. . .


It has been claimed that Nikola Tesla's electrogravity designs used charged hull plates all over the hull, 6 inches of a air gap at the equator (horizontal; latitudally) between plates, and 4 inches of air gap between the plates (longitudinally, or the vertical gaps). Ceramic material was on the outside of the charge plates, acting as armor and allowing the magnetic field to penetrate, and preventing carbon buildup shorting out the plates. Yet, it is such an idea to use plates that can be charged to move a ship electrogravitically to fly very fast in an atmosphere without a buildup of friction or heat on the hull.

I wish to point out that Tesla had used rotating electromagnetic AC charges. And, I wish to point out the nature of the electromagnetic wave being used, not necessarily electro-statically "hard-connected" to the air outside the ship as in a conventional understanding of electrogravity as using the charge force, rather than the magnetic force. He used charged plates, but with a ceramic covering on the outside.

In that sense, look at the benefit of those two styles, as a redundancy-engine feature using rotating AC magnetic forces (like John Searl used), vs AC forces of electrical charge!

That is a point to remember when reading this website. The X-1 uses co-counter-rotating AC electromagnetic fields. So does the outer ring, but it also uses magneto-electrostatic forces! 

Simple electrogravity is achieved in an atmosphere by charging the outside of the hull with electro-(magnetic)-static energy, and the air from the atmosphere of a planet then speeds around the ship, ionized from the ship, and that force harnessed by the outside hull rather than like the space shuttle merely being subject to those forces of ionized friction of atmosphere upon re-entry.

That makes for a nice redundant engine feature.

A proton moving at near light speed is an energy of inertia, an energy of mass and charge in motion. Mass approaches near infinite proportions as it approaches the limit of "light speed," where it will never go faster than light because its mass will start to increase exponentially. So obviously E (Energy) of volts, frequency, and inertia is an energy of substance, mass, charge, magnetic field, and solidity. How can energy be solid like an object when energy itself is without substance? The answer: the very substance of the universe is Energy.

It does not mean that the air will travel at near light speeds around the hull, just very fast. Fast enough to fly at a couple hundred thousand miles per hour without a problem of heat on the hull. There's no heat because there's no resistance. The air vibrates at the same vibration as the hull plating. It's not the same as slamming into still air at high speeds; the air is energized to flow over the hull. This is true when using di-electric materials in between the positive and negative charges of the layers of hull plating, but there can also be air flow around the ship.

There should be air flow around the ship, because the electrogravity hull plating is also used as shielding against high energy cosmic rays and proton storms from stars. That means the charge of the hull plating will affect the space around the ship at electrical frequency. It doesn't have to, but that's how it's designed throughout the website, so I'm not going to change anything now.

To be more specific, the air flow will be there, but that is a secondary force and effect. The "stressing of the di-electric" actually accelerates the mass of the di-electric, causing gravitation. That's the primary force of such electrogravity applications ...

Yet . . . It must be said . . . Light is the unity of energy (and matter). All is Light. What is light, is another question. Light is heat. The Space Shuttle vents heat as light through the radiators in the cargo bay, while in space since there is no atmosphere to conduct heat.


. . .


I used the sphere of granite to understand how gravity would be felt on board a ship, if at all, in deep space, to start learning about that. It appears there will be a natural on-board gravity on the ship, through several reasons, including the spinning X-1 disk below. If it is strong enough to overcome Earth gravity, then it is strong enough to generate an Earth gravity on-board condition, even if the engine is turned on in a heavy-gravity planet environment.

However using di-electric resonance, it can be seen how gravity plating can be used, and just kept charged by the ship's engines.


When I contemplated the onboard gravity thinking about how the sphere worked, I had the floors cambered in a fairly pronounced arch to make it happen. Then I started learning more about this stuff and found out it was more of a natural by-product of directed inertia in geometries. 

Regarding a pilot experiencing G-forces, the pilot would not experience any g-forces taking sharp 90 degree turns at fast speeds, because the craft flies in its own independent gravity spacetime field. I get into a lot of this stuff in my book. It might be a bit too much information to explain on a website. I'm mainly concerned with just the engines and the physics itself more importantly.

We stand on the surface of Earth and don't feel Earth spinning at 2,000 miles per hour, after all. We don't feel the inertia of being thrown against the wall as the Earth rotates around the Sun. We stand on a relative field of a frame of gravity, independent of how Earth moves around in space. 

The craft uses its inertial energy field to travel through other inertial energy fields (fields of gravity). A car or jet aircraft does not create a gravity field with which it uses to travel, it travels through Earth gravity field, although not independent of Earth's gravity field.

The ship doesn't use wings to fly, it uses gravity fields to fly. Those inertial energy fields are kind of like wings, but I don't want to confuse people. 

Furthermore, the ship vibrates faster than solid matter anyway. You would feel no impact with another object, because the X ships more in independent gravity (inertial) fields, independent OF gravity fields. As long as the inertia of the engines is in motion, it can be free to fly up, down, left, right, straight, like how a box would fly. John Searl's experiences with his crafts too, and he was taking on passengers and large additions were being built at a few English airports to accommodate his crafts, the pilots and passengers felt no accelerations and g-forces.

If you CAN take a sharp 90 degree turn at mach 3, and it doesn't tear the aircraft apart, then it surely won't tear the Human body apart, because such a turn would be like hitting a solid brick wall. 

How much does an airplane weigh with 500 chickens on board? Will it weigh the same if all 500 chickens were flying around in the plane? Yes, because that airplane would have an increased mass value due to all those chickens, flying around or sitting (and standing). Putting 500 chickens on board a jumbo jet would increase the jet's mass. It would weigh the same if the chickens were all in cages on board, or standing on the seats, or flying around not touching the sides.

It's like asking how much helium does it take for you to have one pound of that gas? How do you weigh helium balloon if it lifts off from the scales? 

These are interesting questions though. If a chicken could fly as fast as a jumbo jet, it could keep from being pressed against the back of the seat when the jet takes off. Even though you are moving at hundreds of miles per hour though, a chicken can fly faster than a jet simply taking off from the back of the airplane and flying to the front of the plane. These are also speed of light questions.

If a rocket ship is flying just under the speed of light, then if you shine a flashlight from the back of the rocket ship to the front, that beam of light will still travel at 186,000 miles per second from the back of the rocket to the front.

These are all examples of paradoxes.

The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states you can't measure where an electron is simultaneous to which direction and how fast it's moving. You can only measure where it is, OR what direction and how fast it's moving, not both at once. That is also a paradox.

The only way you won't feel yourself being thrown back against the chair when the hyperdrive kicks in, is if gravity pull in front of the ship is equal to the force of accelerating up to speed. 

As, for example in atmospheric electrogravity using charged plates to "fly" a ship in Earth's atmosphere, the air is supercharged into ions, diverting electrons and propelling protons very rapidly from the front of a flying electrogravity ship to the back, becoming ionized, and then meeting up with electron pairs behind the ship, normalizing and neutralizing again after the ship has flown by. So if you put a positive high volt/high frequency charge on front (leading edge) of an airplane's wings, and a negative on the trailing edge of the wings, air is ionized and propelled better than any jet engine. But, it's not quite the same.

The charged air picks up more mass energy, because now that inertia of a charged force is also moving very rapidly. The effect of large mass forces (inertia and motion) is exactly what gravity is.

So as the ship takes those right angled turns, it's falling into a gravity pocket the whole way, equalizing the force of a sudden change of vector, a sudden acceleration, to a zero state so the pilot would feel NO g-forces or forces of inertia and acceleration.

The charged proton at very high volt/frequency moving at very high speeds makes gravity directed in opposite to where it's going. Like how a jet accelerating forward throws you back to the seat, or how a centrifuge throws you to the side walls and you don't slide down.. If you're tiny and in front of a proton when it's flying at high speeds, you'll be forced back against that proton..  that is which way the polarity of gravity is oriented. The proton makes gravity behind where it's inertia is directing it to go. 

Super particle colliders and accelerators, they are huge tubes that stretch for miles around in a circle. They get protons up near light speed, and the mass gets so high, it causes the whole ground all in that area to shake. Meanwhile, a 40 foot Tesla tower can cause the ground to shake on its own from forces of electrical resonance, without even using a battery, just powered by the Earth's own electrical field.



Flying in an independent inertial field (altering temporal frequency) would not be affected by the inertia of surrounding space, or other bodies and mass-objects. It would be one with inertia itself, there would be no objects that could solidly affect inertia upon the ship in an independent inertial field. It would appear invisible to all but of a similar vibration. 




So why would on-board gravity be felt? Well in a charged field where positive is up and negative is down that's making gravity and inertia, wouldn't that polarity of gravity be felt? Would the field of gravity be "magnetized" and captured in the inertial energy bubble of an X class ship when running (in motion)?

Well, if all flight gravity forces was relative to a zero point, and that zero neutral point condition is Earth-like gravity, then those gravity forces would all be in balance when the craft flies around in planets and in space.

Certainly something to consider none-the-less . . .

UPDATED!!!!   x4  (RE-RE-RE-Updated) !!!!!

(11/05/14)


I thought I'd post this. It's food for thought. It has good magnetic engine geometry. There would have to be appropriate timing for a Bedini style setup. Otherwise, if there were no timing, it could follow another style of all-magnetic motors. I should find a video, but magnetic wheels can spin themselves with very, very high acceleration and speed, but very, very, very low torque. In this case, a fast acceleration would be ideal, to create a high frequency magneto-electrostatic field. That would make for a good outer ring drive setup, Tesla style, to increase the frequencies of the internal engines of the LAU-X3.

Please be patient, the photo may take a while to load.

There is an outer ring and an inner ring, both toroid spiral shapes which spin against and counter with each other; dual rotors. It's a similar concept to the X-1 engine itself, but is only an electrical and inertial field generator. When powered up, the two donuts spin counter to each other (the outer and inner donuts). As the field coils pass each other, it creates a reflexive action to shape a wave form of very high volts and frequency. The energy going into it can be amplified very easily. To note, the inner toroid is actually inside the outer toroid. 

Actually, the design is balanced; it needs to be imbalanced. A Balance is when a force or forces act upon something to keep it stable within inherently unstable conditions. Certainly timed pulses would work efficiently on two 12-pointed inner/outer toroid field coils, again, similar to the X-1 engine, but without the capacitor plates connecting the outside components to the central core. Instead of a spiral, independent coils around a 12-point geometry could be timed to accelerate -- Bedini-style -- to a fast speed, creating huge flyback voltage and reflexing with each other, creating a field and overcharge. It would spin at a steady speed eventually, but everything inside the outer ring (the vertical core and lower X-1) could build up more energy.

I've been working a long time on primarily the physics involved in actually achieving warp drive, or FTL, or light-speed. That's the reason I wanted to do this, because if the physics are well established, and it is known what it takes to achieve the technology and design, then things would just be easier overall.

Of course each step achieved leads to a further realization and understanding of the whole. 

I'm thinking of using individual coils instead of a spiral shape. 12 individual angled coils, and 12 counter-angled inside them. Frankly, utrons can be used on the inside (or some other electret/living energy power source), around a spinning track. It's just an idea, something of an inkling of what to shoot for. The only reason I'm getting ahead of myself like this, is just to put an idea there to hold the space, so to speak. It's similar to the X-1, even employing capacitors inside the hull spaces..  using the vertical core as the central accumulator in that system. 


Update: I apologize for making so many changes all the time. I have come to realize about Rotating Alternating Charges. The outer ring geometry MUST be 12 points within 12 points, co-counter rotating, and NOT be 13 points, because of the necessity of Co-Counter Rotating Alternating Charges. (only an even number of coils can be used with AC)   (See: Warp Drive Engineering page for more information)


That is the secret, and the Key to working with the energies of time and gravity. And remember, even in rotating AC fields, there is a positive and a negative. See: Tesla Engineering Physics, in reference to the AC charge field being polarized to put the charge on the ceiling or on the floor. There is polarity to rotating AC charges.




DC polarity:  The picture above is in DC polarity, not AC. In DC polarity, it could still create AC power from electromagnetic field generation and collapses (it collapses in the opposite polarity), and so it should be considered, and not just thrown away.



I've tried to consider all this from every possible angle, just to somewhat cover circumstances that could crop up during a construction phase, and also to show what can be done from an engineering standpoint. The physics are just as important, and so it helps to have something to be able to see. Many things I just cannot even touch here, because I KNOW that things ALWAYS change going from paper to constructed device. The engineering handles the "what if's," but the physics handles the principles, concepts, laws of how the universe operates, and all that so we CAN build. 







Update: To balance the inertial forces of the vertical spinning core, directional flow ports can be vented to the outer ring spinning in opposite to the vertical core. The outer ring drive has an inner vortex core and an outer vortex core, spiraled around the inner core. They both spin opposite to each other, and are in "interference" with each other, meaning the inside and outside are spiraled in difference directions. The outer core is the easiest to access, and easier to tune. Air ported from the central vertical engine to the outer core of the outer ring drive can be electrically charged into motion, to create a counter-balance. 


With all three engines spinning and able to generate electricity, there should be enough power to create this counter-balance effect.

Otherwise, the outer ring needs to accelerate its own inner and outer air flows in co-counter spiraled rotation. So what would balance the inner core?  This is the only issue I have found, and is why the starship Enterprise had two warp nacelles. 

The whole cockpit might have to be able to counter rotate (so the pilots will be sitting still while portions of the ship spins around them), like in the OTC-X1 and just let the ship torque a little. It won't torque much, because of the outer ring co-counter spinning, and the lower X-1 engine co-counter spinning. A mono-pole is the unidirectional polarity of a gravity engine. 

The secret space program uses something similar to an outer ring, but with exotic liquid metal matter sped up to light speeds (possible 220,000 miles per second, electrostatic wave speed). Thus, the ship can fly at those speeds, able for the ship's own independent inertia to travel in those frequencies (at those speeds). 

With a good power supply, those rings can be oval shaped, and two counter-spinning vertical cores used in the middle. But, that is beyond my own technology level. 

It is still a hypothesis that with the outer ring in motion, and with the X-1 engine in motion, that the vertical core would not cause there to be a need to counter-balance the ship at all, and would fly very precisely with a spinning gravitational mono-pole in the middle, coming out 90 degrees from the plane of the counter-rotational toroidal fields.


That's the importance of the outer ring. Otherwise the air/plasma flow would have to accelerate straight down the tube, and out and around the hull of the ship, through the outer rings to break up and phase out the inertia, and then back around the hull and straight down accelerated through the tube again.

I like the vertical cones, though. The universe moves like that. It wouldn't really work too well, if the outer ring wasn't co-counter rotating at the same speeds, unless they are co-counter rotated at Pythagorean perfect note scaled harmonics (one at a harmonic slower than the other), where the wave would be aligned to better provide stability, as well as vibrate at a harmonic which allows luminal flight.



It seems obvious that the ship would only fly at light speeds, with just an X-1 co-counter rotating disk, or just a secret space program "dual 1/2 spin exotic matter ring" system, if what they ("John" from the secret space program) say is true. But with a gravity drive like similar to the vertical core, there can be the conventional warp flight dynamics, pushing the LAU-X3 beyond the speed of light. "Warp speed, Mr. Scott!"


And too, there would be resonance between the lower X-1 drive, and the outer ring drive. Resonance amplifies the energy. Resonance brings the shape of the field into a higher frequency. Sympathetic resonance is like when someone yells into one end of the piano, and all the strings vibrate all the way to the other end of the piano. Sympathetic resonance of space and time, co-counter resonating magneto-electrostatic inertial forces, would increase (amplify) the energy, and raise the frequency of time, and of that space of time.






UPDATE 4:


The forces from the inner vertical core, if in centripetal, would be a force brought into balance within itself. An outward centrifugal force on the vertical core housing would be a force that acts "one with another," acting upon the ship to establish equilibrium, putting a slight torque on the ship causing it into a slight spin.

Rotating AC fields inside the core could cause the proton ionized plasma flow to spin inward upon itself to achieve equilibrium with inner and outer rotational forces to the ship.


Very often, new technologies are developed to achieved desired results where older technologies fall short. Sometimes, it's the older technologies which give us the greatest insights, and strangely work in the more efficient ways. There are some things the digital age just can't do, that analogue can do better. 


If we know what we want to achieve, and it is deemed possible in theory and in physics, then there is always a way to build anything to accomplish the desired goal.







See the comments for additional information about inertial balances of inside and outside forces. 

                                                                                  UPDATED:  4/29/15

This is a magnetic engine good for 36,000 hours before the magnets depolarize:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DPXmvTwTpA





~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.

I have deleted this ...   It's a simple linear acceleration of a magnet, no real torque behind it if taking it in a circle.

It was a magnetic motor concept.  I'm not working with magnetic motors anymore.

But ...    This is interesting below:



Noteworthy links:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lst7_Cw-ZjU    <---   Radio Frequency, Salt Water Engine



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpxOV-NrVGM     <----  Magnetic Motor invented in Oklahoma



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHW6b1aFPfU    <---  Turkish Magnetic Motor; may not have checked out in validity, however




​



​

(Updated 10/05/13)

(I've had to reflect and ponder this information, and to do it in resonance with time and space, in the open rather than behind closed doors to make sure that what COULD be viewed can be viewed with completeness and accuracy rather than leaving anything hanging lose in the breeze.  This post, I have included in my book, "Unified Mechanics of Ascension - The Building Physics of Lightdrives" to complete the information development of an appropriate follow through, to finish the book prior to the next steps of re-engineering development of the OTC-X1)




Black holes are sources of creation of very high frequency energy, just vibrating so fast we can't see them.

Water is created in some distant galaxies from the center of the galaxy, and creates a membrane around the galactic center which protects that rarified cell of intelligent life.

...

Black holes vibrate so fast we can't see them. They are source creation points. Black holes create matter and energy, hence in the Bible "first there was void, let there be light." But a hole is actually source light, and there is no void that is not filled with energy.

Black holes are so luminous and vibrating in such a higher dimension of light that to us in our slower-vibrating space and time, to our eyes it appears as utter darkness!  We think it's a hole that gobbles up matter and energy when in fact it is an upwelling of mass and energy!

...

The question arises:  do black holes actually eat stars? Or do we have it backwards? Used to, physicists thought time slows down at the event horizon and stops, and when you cross the event horizon, all time passes by for infinity. But that's foolish, and always struck me as odd until I realized why. Time SPEED UP closer to a gravity source. That is General Relativity.

Why do you think that we can see into a black hole but when viewed sideways it is flat?

Like, nothing comes out the other side, theoretically.

Have you seen a black hole particle fountain? The black hole emits energies in very high frequency. That's why it "looks" flat, because we see the shape of the energy field through radio telescopes. The flatness of the accretion disk is the disintegration plane of matter, and at the poles is the integration flow of matter.  The hole is black because light escapes it, and is redirected from us. Otherwise it would be too bright to see it, but we are vibrating in a slower frequency of space and time, so we can't see the BRILLIANCE of the brightness of a black hole.

If time is moving very, very fast, you could look at our solar system and see the planets moving very, very fast around the sun, year by year passing by in seconds, if you were around a black hole but very far from it.

It has immense gravity, but that is different. It has immense vibration. Matter is at extreme high frequency near the hole.  In a ship, you'd be vibrating extremely fast, and its energy would start resonating with the ship. If you resonate high enough, THAT is the event horizon; it is the speed of vibration. 

It's a gravity generator, a mass generator, not squeezed down into a 2-D plane, or a 1-D singularity; and although it has toroidal characteristics, it exists in many more dimensions that we cannot detect.  Such a collapse is a re-folding within, than an unfolding without, or into.  As it collapses, it expands.  The tidal forces of energy expand.

Electrodynamically speaking, the poles move through each other in the center, passing through and within, thus it is flat looking at it one-way, but it is the representation of the utron, and of the central accumulator and accretion plane.

The magnetic north and south poles of the star it once was (and still is), are now the particle fountains flowing forth out of the vortex generating center.


...

Are particles mono-polar?  If an electron moved backwards, it would be a positron, for example..   yet they also exist in pairs as two petals of the same flower, but they can be separated in a particle collision from the main flower and spin off on their own, yet their orbits are connected from the flower, and yet they travel in opposite directions, with opposite spins, as individual particals.  ..  yet forever entangled as twins. 

It doesn't mean they are separate, even at great distance.  Every electron has behind it a positron, and every positron has behind it an electron, but the difference itself is the Mirror, which is 1.11111111111

If you reverse the spin of one, at the same time, at no matter what distance the particles are away from each other, SIMULTANEOUSLY the other twin partical's spin reverses. 

David Sereda has examined the "quantum difference" as the ratio of symmetry to be 1.1111111111  ...  see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhXGI56eHN8



I don't view electrons and protons as mono-polar.  I view their charge as the direction of their inertia, their manifestation.  But, the physics of Otis T. Carr suggests they may be.  Electrons are anti to positrons, what's the difference?  There is a slight difference, a different spin direction, and a slightly different speed ...   the positron is slightly smaller than the electron, and the ratio of their difference is 1.1111111111.   That number comes up a LOT in the natural ways of the Universe. 




Quantum mechanics relies too heavly on the quantum vacuum, or quantum void, which is the worst direction really..  There is never any void that is not filled with energy, and instead of things coming in and out of a void, which is ludicrous, particles come in and out of Source Energy, Source Creation, entering and leaving the universe as twins.

That flaw in quantum mechanics uses existing technology which consumes matter and leaves a void, which is a different type of energy, more like a negative universe, and not very pleasant.

The very idea of creation from nothing is okay, it's a phenomenal paradox of creation, but the very idea of creation coming from void is not kind.  Because void is something.  Why must it be so, that light was born out of darkness, out of void?  It's easier to see that darkness is light's own shadow and that light is all present.  Any vibration of matter is light.  All matter is energy and vibrates.  There is no place where matter stops vibrating and energy ceases to exist.  Energy is CONSTANTLY created, and never can be destroyed.  So there is no void, no quantum vacuum.  What is it?  Creative Source.  "Quantum" Source Point Creation.



~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ .

Dark matter behaves in similar ways to a black hole, in that an obvious luminous body can't be seen to create it. Black holes can be seen as luminous through gravity and electromagnetic telescopes, however, even though the naked eye cannot see it because it is vibrating too fast.

Dark matter is mass-energy; vibrating energy fields, vibrating faster than normal luminous bodies, "cloaked" in invisibility at a higher frequency than the Human visual range of the light spectrum.

Tesla had a theory of electromagnetic gravity that remains classified to this day.  It involved rotating magnetic fields.

The MEG for example (see the bottom of the Tesla Power article on the Free Energy / Tesla page), when a load is pulled, it pulls more energy from the active vacuum, until it eventually caps off, and then very unusual things happen.  

I've noticed this accidentally with the Tesla Tower and other energy experiments of mine, that a current will flow so as long as there is a load; and a current will flow to ground and continue to flow to ground from the tower, so as long as that circuit is unbroken.  That deals with negative energy.

In my original Tesla tower experiments, there was energy being generated that could be tapped as it flows to ground, but once that connection was broken, the energy was gone.  

In an electromagnetic generator experiment of mine, I had obtained an old capacitor that had been sitting around outside for many years, and so I hooked it up.  The generator produced more energy with less effort, but as soon as I stopped the generator, and went to restart it, all that excess energy was gone.  

Imagine what rotating MEG assemblies can do spinning around, and then we've got something similar to the OTC-X1.  Superconductors levitate.  An effect of negative energy in some situations also will cause the generator to ice up and levitate (as seen in private tests under certain conditions tuned to certain frequencies).  So we see some relations, here.  Everything has frequency, even magnets.  A magnet can be tuned to generate its magnetic field at a certain frequency, for example when a magnet is being made.

Edward Leedskalnin noticed that gravity and electromagnetism were directly related, in that an electromagnetic field could be applied in a wire, and that could magnetize nearby pieces of steel fishing line, and that the steel fishing line would demonstrate a spin reversal when crossing over the plumb and level axis of the wire (crossing on either side of vertical, or above and below the horizontal planes relative with Earth's gravity field).  

When the wire was energized, the tips of the steel fishing line would either curl to the left or to the right as it crossed the exact horizontal or vertical planes of the wire.  So hold the fishing line to the side of a wire, and drop it below level, or raise it above the level plane; or hold the fishing line to the left, and cross over the plumb axis to the right side of the wire.  All this goes to show that electromagnetic fields and currents do respond to gravity, and the reason is because gravity is another dimension of electromagnetism.

There's a lot of research one could look up about electromagnetic gravity, in fact.  It can be said that all fundamental forces are electromagnetic in one way or another, and all relates to electromagnetism, in varying dimensions of action.  

All of this above has been discussed at some place in this website.




Here are some links to aid one in exploring electromagnetic mass and electromagnetic gravity:
​

​http://www.holoscience.com/wp/electric-gravity-in-an-electric-universe/​

​http://www.netowne.com/technology/important/

https://teslaresearch.jimdo.com/

https://www.paradox-paradigm.nl/?page_id=325

​https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.5619



.......


People have accused me of not understanding this technology I rely heavily upon.  I'll admit, some of it I do understand, and I understand what must exist, in order for the technology to exist.  But all of the proofs and mathematics and such is overshadowed by a far easier and more simplistic way to test these technologies, and that is simply to back-engineer them.  John Searle's SEG and the OTC-X1 are two marvels which have sufficient evidence to conclude that they are possible; and some people working with the SEG have seen it work.  The Russians have done work with the SEG and have seen that it reduces its own weight to zero.  

​Townsend Brown's work has actually been demonstrated, however, and di-electrostatic gravity does work.  

I'm planning on publishing Tesla tower Ley-line negative energy technology in 2 - 5 years here on this website.  I'll see what happens afterwards; however afterwards, the OTC-X1 should have achieved sufficient development through other private research and developers, I'm hoping.  I may however choose to take an entirely different path toward spirituality and metaphysics.  

I've done a lot of work on this website to get this technology up to a point of where we can understand what we're dealing with, to encourage people to build it and test it, instead of theorizing about building and testing it, and battling over their own beliefs of "will it work; am I wasting my time," etc.  It's not a waste of time, as long as there is sufficient evidence to show it can work.  But you won't see any of this in any mainstream university, because a university setting will not include a back-engineering curriculum to get something to work, without a way to truly understand why it works.  

However, if one has experience in these matters, then one's intuition will serve one much more in these capacities as an inventor, rather than as a scholar.  An inventor rarely comes up with a proof first, but just has a belief, an idea, and the motivation to try something; because invention is that which can begin to establish an understanding of new technology, because an inventor will try things based on intuition most often in contrary to modern accepted ideology and theory.  I think inventing is a far easier way to understand the universe, rather than theory.  However at least SOME theory must exist prior, otherwise no invention could be conceived, so in order to try.

Step one:  utrons

This will take a couple of years.



I'm happy with the design.

I hope this website is readable and useful.  It includes NASA's theories, Tesla's, Otis T. Carr's (Telsa's apprentice) and others, and my own.

I'm very surprised, particularly how everything fits together.  At least it's a good road map toward building the OTC-X1, and then experimenting with additional upgrades, and other designs such as X2, and X3. 

...

I believe there are a few things worth exploring:  The Hendershot generator (Black Box), self-charging capacitors and electrets, and vortex - plasma energy systems.  I'm pretty sure all that will take some time.  The Hendershot generator is Earth-based, requiring a planetary magnetic field.  Too many of them all over the place might disturb the Earth's magnetic field, and I wonder how many things we have already that contribute to Earth changes.  I'd like to post a link to yet another working magnetic motor, also:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI3227d5Css

There was one built by a couple of guys in Australia, but that hasn't gone anywhere that I know of.  The one in the link has a good amount of horsepower that could provide power outside the Earth's magnetosphere where solar panels are not practical.  I'm sure we have more advanced technology than this in secret and in private. 

...

It is ironic at how much time and money goes into free energy technology, and how profitable it can be to everyone, and to the environment, and to our educations and enlightened living.  Energy is always created in abundance and never can be destroyed. 

It's important to be safe and responsible, though, to discern and be wise instead of reckless.  Life systems have their own safeguards built-in.  How life is affected is important, too.  It's a slow process, and as the unnatural tendency of Humans to destroy instead of create is the road out of ignorance and into enlightenment, we find ourselves living in a time of collapse simultaneous with a time of re-birth.  There is nothing to fear because there are multiple parallel realities occuring simultaneously which means we don't have to experience loss in order to also experience gain.  There is no loss, and yet there is everything to gain.

Respect and honor to life is the key to harmony with all peoples, and any gift is not what one wants to give another, but what another wants to receive.  I'm not saying this is for all people unless fear has been overcome by all people.  And so it is what it is, and by walking paths of Love, people can find their ways (me included).

People like their ways, and it is not for me to tell people otherwise.  What can be profitable to some can be hurtful to others, emotionally, mentally, and culturally.  I for one find it difficult to relate to many people about these things, but then again to many people I can.  There is a balance in respecting people's ways and choices.  A walk-about on Earth flows with all changes, all hopes and dreams, remaining centered to what may come, and to what may already be.  How we can be, and how we are, is what it is, and it is only up to the individual to choose, wisely.  What is in the past already has been, yet it is the future which when one is there can look back and see the past has been what led to it.  Thus the past too, is always in motion, as is the future, and where one is [in the] now.



The sum of the probable pasts influences the current present. QED. A future event requires there to be a past timeline to achieve it. The future creates the past, and the present moment exists in all pasts and all futures as a probable place in time.

                   ...   Looks like a flying spaceport!

      Much Peace and Joy and Love

Image published March 07, 2011 by Devin Faraci.  Image found at badassdigest.com






That looks like something mankind built! 

This is my very first blog.  I've spent many years reasearching and working in the lab.  I've learned a lot of interesting things.  Ultimately it's very time consuming without support or help.  And really I'm interested in other things rather than spending a lot of time doing experimental engineering.  I wonder how many people are out there who want the same things and are willing to get their hands dirty building test engines or airframes?  Personally, it seems that a lot of this stuff will kick it around our solar system pretty easily, and most certainly fly around the planet and work for local trips around "town."  There's a lot of things to consider taking steps like this.  Are we spiritually ready for it?  Will we get shot down on a joy ride at the beach, or in isolated mountains where we need air support to travel with ease to the neighbor's house on the other side of the mountain?  Where will these ships work, and where would they just be trouble in general?  And if they CAN get us to other star systems, well that would require a lot of resources to do so safely.  Starting small is good, but is it worth the effort when there are so few who seem to really want to build these things?  Surely we can do whatever we put our hearts and minds to doing.  But doing so in harmony with others is the only way to really achieve it, in group and team efforts. 

It should be fun, really.  It shouldn't be hard or challenging or stressful.  It should be done with responsibility though, and mankind is just starting to get a grasp on that, it seems, as a whole. 

What do YOU think about all this mess? 

This is just a general kick-off question.  This also opens up an oppourtunity to share your thoughts and feelings and desires about antigravity aircraft and potentially warp capable spacecraft.  What do YOU want?

For me, it's not really a question of will it work, but when will we be flying.  There's a lot of stuff that needs to be done around the planet, and in our own back yards.  With resources of free energy and free transportation, things really could change for the highest good. 

I am pleased to open this up to the general public, it's been a long time in coming.  A lot of people have worked toward these endeavers, and I feel the time is ripe for such creations to be "out in the open."  Much of it has been done in private, and I feel more will be done in private still, away from public view.  We have to start somewhere, in my humble opinion.  I feel also, that these ships are good, and it shows that if we can go "out there" then others can come here...  hopefully friendlies, long lost Human cousins and family. 

There is a lot of information to show that there are very many species of ET out in the universe though, and that Earth is a very special and sacred place.  If we get our acts together, then perhaps warp drive (at the very least) won't be too long in coming, and what changes will have to occur for us to experience a remarkable and enlightened planetary and galactic reality for the highest good?

I think changes are underway, at a nice easy pace though.  I think the hard times are in the past moreso than what we face in the present and in the future.

A warp drive reality is now no longer strictly in the realm of science fiction.  There are people moving toward those endeavers, particularly at icarusinterstellar.com  ...  which is the very first place I've found which seriously is considering to BUILD what mankind has dreampt of, and perhaps been too afraid to believe.  It's all in time, and certainly what we have today is a new history in the making.    Peace and Goodwill to Mankind ...  and beyond!