This article is dedicated to Sokedai Stu Fanning. Thank you for your Keen Knowledge of University physics.
I had thought that I will have to rework all the General and Special Relativity on this website, it surely needs a LOT of editing; however, it's pretty close as I'm finding out. It's not an easy read. It's a hard read with lots of heavy science. There are some anomalies though with General and Special Relativity that don't make them incorrect, but instead with a point of view shift, General and Special Relativity is NONE-THE-LESS able to explain the mechanisms of time warping to seem in reverse of standard accepted notions that nothing can exceed the speed of light.
Gravity and Time are inversely proportional to each other. Gravity is density, and where there's more gravity, there is more separation from Light (Light itself at a state of zero time, or simultaneous time), thus a slower time frequency. ACTUALLY, HERE'S THE PARADOX:
The time frequency INCREASES closer to gravity, but time itself slows down according to observation. That is an unusual paradox. Out in deep space, time is faster because the "time-wave" is longer (more space between each moment; taking fewer seconds to travel a greater distance). More time passes closer to gravity because the "time-wavelength" is shorter. That would make it appear that time slows down closer to gravity (like a black hole) because it takes many, many, many more seconds for ONLY A SINGLE second to pass close to a massive gravitational source. . . . So for a guy in a super-space-suit near a black hole to make just one little movement, it takes many, many more seconds in that frequency of super-density.
That is a true paradox, because only with a longer wavelength of a time frequency (cycles of seconds after each other in a distance of space) can it take less seconds to travel a greater distance!
What the focus is in General Relativity, is the Action itself! The SAME action can take either more time or less time. It should not be considered that the frequency of time allows for more or less action, because that's just relative; it is the action itself which is the only thing that can determine different time frequencies in different spatial locations.
If an action takes more time or less time is what matters. If the same action takes many more seconds to complete, or takes only a tiny fraction of a second to do what would otherwise normally take longer, then we can start to consider how frequencies in time actually work. Space is the big consideration, which forms around frequencies of time.
It doesn't make any sense, even though it completely opposite and in reverse. A faster time frequency should mean more action can take place when observed in an outside slower time frequency very far away. The reason why we aren't seeing super-accelerated time near a black hole is because there is an EVENT HORIZON!
Acceleration is also a gravity force according to Einstein's equivalence, and so Special Relativity can apply the relativity of spacetime warps to objects in motion, particularly with compatibly (and comparably) different masses, coincidentally enough. The paradox appears in the same way.
This is why General and Special Relativity can be used to explain how to create spacetime warps in starships, and for a starship to exceed the speed of light.
FREQUENCY IS THE KEY! LESS MASS AT HIGHER FREQUENCY is the solution realized by the LAU-X3 lower engine -- the basic OTC-X1, originally conceived and invented by Nikola Tesla, himself!
Gravity and time inversely proportional to each other implies outside the solar system in deep space, outside of a star's gravitational field, one traveling in a rocket is traveling in a much faster frequency of time, Generally, and distance is shortened dramatically, and warped in the presence of gravitational fields and increased mass due to acceleration near the speed of light.
The faster one accelerates, the more one beats the seconds of time frequency, traveling at a slower rate, according to strict General Relativity.
That is a true paradox.
Increasing gravitational mass however can work toward our advantage, particularly if we can phase two co-counter-rotational gravity waves to zero, thus becoming light, and able to travel independent of time itself, such as a tachyon.
That's the principles of the OTC-X1, and the principles of a negative energy / negative mass warp bubble.
. . .
The conditions observed by UFO researchers however is in opposite. Time speeds up around the craft, and within the craft; the craft travels in a faster frequency of time. Co-counter rotation of gravity fields (magneto-electrostatic inertia) increases the frequency of time, bringing the moments between the seconds closer together in an energy field that permeates and surrounds the craft.
That's the basis of warp drive.
. . .
Relativity has been a HUGE issue! The paradox of measurement also is a huge issue. The only way to test these things is in a spaceship capable of warp drive, to get around and make our measurements and observations inside and outside of our Solar system's gravity field, which will seem in direct violation of GR, because of the nature of the engines.
Things seem in reverse!
At black hole conditions, we can measure time coming to a stand-still, meanwhile gravity waves travel much faster than light (frequency of time as light measures spacetime frequency).
When these issues of General and Special Relativity came up, it really through a wrench in the works of explaining and understanding how GR and SR apply within a warp drive frame of reality.
I have done everything I can to explain these paradoxes though in great detail, where unfortunately the greater detail takes away from the meaning itself of what we can achieve in attempt to convey information to those who are locked into believing that nothing can travel faster than light according to General Relativity, unless someone decides to analyse a lot of data, which is hard work; and most people will avoid that.
. . .
I've tried my best to explain everything so a Layman can understand, without going into Calculus, but I don't think I can avoid that. Sacred Geometry and Vortex Geometry is adequate enough to explain it, but having a grasp on paradoxical theory, and just having to deal with plane ole' confusion is troublesome at best.
Needless to say, I've discovered some very troublesome paradoxes that re-define everything we know currently about Inflation of Space, Relativity, and Light Speed.
I've heard scientists discussing Relativity also and getting things backwards MANY times, for instance claiming the faster one travels, the longer one's day, when it should be the other way around: The faster one travels, one's day gets shorter and shorter, according to Einstein. I'm not the only one who gets confused over Relativity!
I just can't help to think that we're dealing with primitive physics concerning General Relativity, and that the universe is much more clever than we are. Gravity bends light to magnify a distance galaxy in a Gravity Lens. Gravitation bends spacetime to shorten the distance to distant location. It's a very similar concept, but two different applications.
There are also things we've observed in nature, in the universe, in our reality, that clearly violates General Relativity. But those things appear to be covered up and in secret, and our government institutions such as NASA have also been caught in questionable acts to compartmentalize and sanitize space-based information (which was their original Charter and directives).
Tesla believed, and many of our top scientists also believe in a scientific conspiracy to hide the truth, and limit one half of the sciences that we are supposed to already know, brought to us by Tesla and other well-known scientists. It has been shown that Tesla was responsible for most of our modern world, but he was not even in the text books or history books for the longest time. These things cannot be ignored, and are all variables in the grand equation.
So please, all you scientists out there reading this website, bare with me as far as the Relativity goes.
I have tried to stick with mainstream thought, however in the Starship Relativity blog post below, I really think I have something there showing that within a strong field of gravitation, time is faster (Tesla), but surrounding that field of gravitation, time is slower (Einstein).
Simply put, in the center of for example the sun, or the Earth, the gravity is at a zero because all the mass is surrounding the center, creating gravitation and curvature of spacetime. So in the center of the star, or planet, that is in the future then the slower time on the outer surface (because inertial mass gravitation and acceleration speeds up the time frequency; yet time speeds up away-from and apart-from a gravity field -- the time that is from beyond the event horizon observed from within the event horizon -- thus time is slower on the surface of a planet or star, and faster toward the center, slowing down the outside time and speeding up the inside time frequency).
That is also, a paradox.
That is why the Relativity is confusing and potentially frustrating.
This isn't rocket science; it is warp drive physics. It SHOULD be hard, but it doesn't have to be. No holds barred, all things revealed.
I had thought that I will have to rework all the General and Special Relativity on this website, it surely needs a LOT of editing; however, it's pretty close as I'm finding out. It's not an easy read. It's a hard read with lots of heavy science. There are some anomalies though with General and Special Relativity that don't make them incorrect, but instead with a point of view shift, General and Special Relativity is NONE-THE-LESS able to explain the mechanisms of time warping to seem in reverse of standard accepted notions that nothing can exceed the speed of light.
Gravity and Time are inversely proportional to each other. Gravity is density, and where there's more gravity, there is more separation from Light (Light itself at a state of zero time, or simultaneous time), thus a slower time frequency. ACTUALLY, HERE'S THE PARADOX:
The time frequency INCREASES closer to gravity, but time itself slows down according to observation. That is an unusual paradox. Out in deep space, time is faster because the "time-wave" is longer (more space between each moment; taking fewer seconds to travel a greater distance). More time passes closer to gravity because the "time-wavelength" is shorter. That would make it appear that time slows down closer to gravity (like a black hole) because it takes many, many, many more seconds for ONLY A SINGLE second to pass close to a massive gravitational source. . . . So for a guy in a super-space-suit near a black hole to make just one little movement, it takes many, many more seconds in that frequency of super-density.
That is a true paradox, because only with a longer wavelength of a time frequency (cycles of seconds after each other in a distance of space) can it take less seconds to travel a greater distance!
What the focus is in General Relativity, is the Action itself! The SAME action can take either more time or less time. It should not be considered that the frequency of time allows for more or less action, because that's just relative; it is the action itself which is the only thing that can determine different time frequencies in different spatial locations.
If an action takes more time or less time is what matters. If the same action takes many more seconds to complete, or takes only a tiny fraction of a second to do what would otherwise normally take longer, then we can start to consider how frequencies in time actually work. Space is the big consideration, which forms around frequencies of time.
It doesn't make any sense, even though it completely opposite and in reverse. A faster time frequency should mean more action can take place when observed in an outside slower time frequency very far away. The reason why we aren't seeing super-accelerated time near a black hole is because there is an EVENT HORIZON!
Acceleration is also a gravity force according to Einstein's equivalence, and so Special Relativity can apply the relativity of spacetime warps to objects in motion, particularly with compatibly (and comparably) different masses, coincidentally enough. The paradox appears in the same way.
This is why General and Special Relativity can be used to explain how to create spacetime warps in starships, and for a starship to exceed the speed of light.
FREQUENCY IS THE KEY! LESS MASS AT HIGHER FREQUENCY is the solution realized by the LAU-X3 lower engine -- the basic OTC-X1, originally conceived and invented by Nikola Tesla, himself!
Gravity and time inversely proportional to each other implies outside the solar system in deep space, outside of a star's gravitational field, one traveling in a rocket is traveling in a much faster frequency of time, Generally, and distance is shortened dramatically, and warped in the presence of gravitational fields and increased mass due to acceleration near the speed of light.
The faster one accelerates, the more one beats the seconds of time frequency, traveling at a slower rate, according to strict General Relativity.
That is a true paradox.
Increasing gravitational mass however can work toward our advantage, particularly if we can phase two co-counter-rotational gravity waves to zero, thus becoming light, and able to travel independent of time itself, such as a tachyon.
That's the principles of the OTC-X1, and the principles of a negative energy / negative mass warp bubble.
. . .
The conditions observed by UFO researchers however is in opposite. Time speeds up around the craft, and within the craft; the craft travels in a faster frequency of time. Co-counter rotation of gravity fields (magneto-electrostatic inertia) increases the frequency of time, bringing the moments between the seconds closer together in an energy field that permeates and surrounds the craft.
That's the basis of warp drive.
. . .
Relativity has been a HUGE issue! The paradox of measurement also is a huge issue. The only way to test these things is in a spaceship capable of warp drive, to get around and make our measurements and observations inside and outside of our Solar system's gravity field, which will seem in direct violation of GR, because of the nature of the engines.
Things seem in reverse!
At black hole conditions, we can measure time coming to a stand-still, meanwhile gravity waves travel much faster than light (frequency of time as light measures spacetime frequency).
When these issues of General and Special Relativity came up, it really through a wrench in the works of explaining and understanding how GR and SR apply within a warp drive frame of reality.
I have done everything I can to explain these paradoxes though in great detail, where unfortunately the greater detail takes away from the meaning itself of what we can achieve in attempt to convey information to those who are locked into believing that nothing can travel faster than light according to General Relativity, unless someone decides to analyse a lot of data, which is hard work; and most people will avoid that.
. . .
I've tried my best to explain everything so a Layman can understand, without going into Calculus, but I don't think I can avoid that. Sacred Geometry and Vortex Geometry is adequate enough to explain it, but having a grasp on paradoxical theory, and just having to deal with plane ole' confusion is troublesome at best.
Needless to say, I've discovered some very troublesome paradoxes that re-define everything we know currently about Inflation of Space, Relativity, and Light Speed.
I've heard scientists discussing Relativity also and getting things backwards MANY times, for instance claiming the faster one travels, the longer one's day, when it should be the other way around: The faster one travels, one's day gets shorter and shorter, according to Einstein. I'm not the only one who gets confused over Relativity!
I just can't help to think that we're dealing with primitive physics concerning General Relativity, and that the universe is much more clever than we are. Gravity bends light to magnify a distance galaxy in a Gravity Lens. Gravitation bends spacetime to shorten the distance to distant location. It's a very similar concept, but two different applications.
There are also things we've observed in nature, in the universe, in our reality, that clearly violates General Relativity. But those things appear to be covered up and in secret, and our government institutions such as NASA have also been caught in questionable acts to compartmentalize and sanitize space-based information (which was their original Charter and directives).
Tesla believed, and many of our top scientists also believe in a scientific conspiracy to hide the truth, and limit one half of the sciences that we are supposed to already know, brought to us by Tesla and other well-known scientists. It has been shown that Tesla was responsible for most of our modern world, but he was not even in the text books or history books for the longest time. These things cannot be ignored, and are all variables in the grand equation.
So please, all you scientists out there reading this website, bare with me as far as the Relativity goes.
I have tried to stick with mainstream thought, however in the Starship Relativity blog post below, I really think I have something there showing that within a strong field of gravitation, time is faster (Tesla), but surrounding that field of gravitation, time is slower (Einstein).
Simply put, in the center of for example the sun, or the Earth, the gravity is at a zero because all the mass is surrounding the center, creating gravitation and curvature of spacetime. So in the center of the star, or planet, that is in the future then the slower time on the outer surface (because inertial mass gravitation and acceleration speeds up the time frequency; yet time speeds up away-from and apart-from a gravity field -- the time that is from beyond the event horizon observed from within the event horizon -- thus time is slower on the surface of a planet or star, and faster toward the center, slowing down the outside time and speeding up the inside time frequency).
That is also, a paradox.
That is why the Relativity is confusing and potentially frustrating.
This isn't rocket science; it is warp drive physics. It SHOULD be hard, but it doesn't have to be. No holds barred, all things revealed.
This is a new type of relativity to explain that mechanism. It's Paradoxical Relativity. It is the result of at least two points of view along-side, yet opposite-with each other. There are two points of view separated with an event horizon in between, basically.
Obviously, from within a faster frequency-field of time itself, then time speeds up; and someone riding inside that bubble will observe time come to a slowing of everything around and outside that bubble.
The mechanism is the same regardless -- a faster time frequency means more action takes place in less space, NEGATIVE space in fact is how we would observe that bubble (from outside it and looking upon it). If the force of gravity of a massive object were to lose that gravity, and lose that space, what is left is very fast temporal frequency of near-light, of which there is a light event horizon between the "near and far" locations measured with Relativity in a "collapsed" or negative space that is very tiny, which can be artificially created with a machine.
That is just what happened with Bob Lazar's story of observing a candle (frozen in time) in the field of an ET gravity-tube device from a recovered UFO. The placed a candle in the path of the gravity beam and turned the machine on, observing the candle to be frozen in time. A faster time frequency took place within a field of what looked to be extraordinarily slow or stopped time, but when the machine was turned OFF, the candle had already melted and burned the table. It seems that there is a match; a correlation.
Using magneto-electrostatic inertial mass acceleration in an engine speeds up time to one riding in that field, but ONLY under one condition. The normal fabric of spacetime, that of gravity and mass and such, is different from the fabric of (mainly electrical; and electromagnetic) frequency and vibration, which IS spacetime.
Funneling the fabric of spacetime through a vortex of the one and only condition forces normal spacetime to enter a higher frequency of accelerated and faster-flowing time, passing through an artificial event horizon.
That's the principle of a warp drive, and that is just what we have, here.
What we ALSO have, is a point of discontinuity in the entire universe, from within the engines of our starship.
It is the "end of the universe" as we know it! Literally. Within the engines of the theoretical starship. However, where and WHEN there is a discontinuity in the Universe, it shows where information can travel from one system to another system altogether, showing that the universe is NOT a closed system.
The point of discontinuity is when spacetime fabric (gravity and mass and such) is pulled into the engines, to be transformed to light.
Obviously, from within a faster frequency-field of time itself, then time speeds up; and someone riding inside that bubble will observe time come to a slowing of everything around and outside that bubble.
The mechanism is the same regardless -- a faster time frequency means more action takes place in less space, NEGATIVE space in fact is how we would observe that bubble (from outside it and looking upon it). If the force of gravity of a massive object were to lose that gravity, and lose that space, what is left is very fast temporal frequency of near-light, of which there is a light event horizon between the "near and far" locations measured with Relativity in a "collapsed" or negative space that is very tiny, which can be artificially created with a machine.
That is just what happened with Bob Lazar's story of observing a candle (frozen in time) in the field of an ET gravity-tube device from a recovered UFO. The placed a candle in the path of the gravity beam and turned the machine on, observing the candle to be frozen in time. A faster time frequency took place within a field of what looked to be extraordinarily slow or stopped time, but when the machine was turned OFF, the candle had already melted and burned the table. It seems that there is a match; a correlation.
Using magneto-electrostatic inertial mass acceleration in an engine speeds up time to one riding in that field, but ONLY under one condition. The normal fabric of spacetime, that of gravity and mass and such, is different from the fabric of (mainly electrical; and electromagnetic) frequency and vibration, which IS spacetime.
Funneling the fabric of spacetime through a vortex of the one and only condition forces normal spacetime to enter a higher frequency of accelerated and faster-flowing time, passing through an artificial event horizon.
That's the principle of a warp drive, and that is just what we have, here.
What we ALSO have, is a point of discontinuity in the entire universe, from within the engines of our starship.
It is the "end of the universe" as we know it! Literally. Within the engines of the theoretical starship. However, where and WHEN there is a discontinuity in the Universe, it shows where information can travel from one system to another system altogether, showing that the universe is NOT a closed system.
The point of discontinuity is when spacetime fabric (gravity and mass and such) is pulled into the engines, to be transformed to light.
I feel the need to explain the last sentence above.
The mechanism can be seen more completely on the warp drive engineering page.
An exotic metal in a liquid form, microwaved (See: John Hutchison, Dr. Judy Woods, and the Promise Revealed links on this website) to that phase of matter (or not using microwaves, but another type of mono-atomic exotic-tempered material; I personally know someone who has achieved exotic tempering of copper to 7500 degrees F, and have had independent lab tests all confirming this), made to accelerate at electrostatic wave speed in co-counter rotational vector (in some way or another), greatly increases the inertial mass (gravity), while simultaneously taking that huge value and phasing it to a zero (like how two waves can interfere 180 degrees off to cancel each other). That is the mechanism involved.
Electrostatic energy (parallel waves, traveling at 220,000 miles per second, faster than transverse electromagnetic waves) has no usable or measurable electromagnet. That is because that electromagnet has two waves spinning in co-counter rotation, phasing out the electromagnetic wave to a zero.
Electrostatic waves can be polarized to get an electromagnetic wave out of it (at which point the electrostatic energy becomes electromagnetic), of which an electromagnetic wave spins only in ONE direction. Edward Leedskalnin did a few simple experiments also which shows that nature of electromagnetism.
Also see the Tesla Engineering page for my experiments on the above.
The reverse can too be said, that two co-counter spinning electromagnetic waves simultaneously is the essence of an electrostatic energy.
The OTC-X1 engine may not have the potential to convert 100% matter into light, however it is at least a warp drive. Warp drive is much simpler than hyperspace teleportation.
... also see the last part of the subsection "Dimensional Geometry" on the Warp Drive Engineering page for a follow up on this, and adding more explanation to the difference between frequencies of space, and frequencies of time. Space and Time have a paradoxical relationship, but Time would be the direction toward unification, not space.
Also when it comes to living energy, "frequency" applies to time, and intensity/duration/permanency.
This is a very deep tertiary paradox that is hard to grasp. The paradox unifies in one way only, with DI-Rection. For example in the paradox of Love and fear, fear leads toward duality, and Love IS Unity. That example illustrates a divergent of realities altogether that cannot co-exist simultaneously. Only in Unity, can reality co-exist simultaneously. It has everything to do with frequency and resonance.
One of the biggest things Tesla discovered was how to transform between the different energy types of the universe. He claimed light to be a magneto-electrostatic wave, and Heinrich Hertz changed his mind and attempted to change his patent claim after Tesla asked him to pump all the air out of the box and see if he still gets a spark. Light is the Unity.
If Light is the Unity, and all matter is light energy of paradoxical form, and light has no mass and really isn't a physical "thing" at all, then matter should be able to teleport and ascend, ultimately, because matter is light. That's what warp drive physics shows us. Einstein tried to show us that Gravity can be viewed with frequency (just like what Tesla knew), because of his equation relating Gravity to Energy. E = mc^2.
Gravity is an aspect of time, so gravity can be viewed as (and with) frequency as Tesla said, and that there is also shape is what Einstein said. Light has frequency, because space has time.
And the MOST amazing thing ever, is that wave mechanics can be used to explain this, what is otherwise hard for one to understand without experience in the field working with these types of co-counter-spinning inertial forces.
A Vortex coil wound in an interference pattern, for example of those seen on http://1stopenergies.com/, does not cancel itself out after all. So we aren't exactly "phasing the wave to zero" in the strictest of sense.
The interference coil wound in an impossible way shows that two simultaneous waves, opposite (and equal -- paradoxical) of each other, does NOT cancel itself out, in Vortex.
How this applies to the starship engine, the Outer Ring Drive: This creates a condition of resonance of greatly increased energy (frequency, volts, amps, watts, inertial frequency). It is a field generator and a transformer, creating a field of faster time (a time-frequency field) but as a result of the unification toward light, rather than the separation from light. It will resonate with the quantum vacuum -- the Inner Universe, the Essence of the Fabric of the Universe, itself (that's what the quantum vacuum is).
RECAP:
A warp bubble raises the frequencies of time so that more action can take place in that field.
Relatively speaking, the same action takes place in less time.
Those are two different ways of looking at the same thing, and is also the same thing seen in two different ways. It is interchangeable when gravity (inertial mass) is not changed but requires a change of inertial mass without a change in gravity. Gravity and inertial mass are interchangeable also. There is a force generated, but under only one condition will an increased acceleration of inertial mass DECREASE the force of gravitation from increased mass.
That means that an accelerated proton would lose mass as it approaches the speed of light under this one and only condition, basically, to make that analogy. That does not violate general relativity or special relativity, but relativity is what explains the mechanism of the one-and-only condition.
Also, relatively speaking, near a black hole, the same action would take place in much more time (taking much longer).
But the conditions reverse on the other side of the event horizon. There has to be an event horizon, because there are two different frames of reality. There is no real separation though, because energy is exchanged when the existence of each other is discovered. The fact of observing such a thing means that it is not separate from the universe, but part of it.
The black hole is a gravitational vortex, with high frequency energy being released out the poles, due to the high compression of space due to gravity. It is an energy generator, a relative singularity of energy and matter creation. Around the nucleus of some distant galaxies, we can see a water membrane form around the core, comprised mainly of black holes.
Space and Time can be transformed in a warp drive. Hyperspace teleportation is the condition of having undefined space, where time approaches infinity -- the Light Drive. . . . Space and Time INTERFERE with each other (interference waves ; inversely proportional with each other ; paradoxical). Light (information) reflects back to us, information, measuring space AND time, because light is not space and time and all space and time, having no mass, and is the unity of the two as one.
. . . also see the blog post below a ways entitled, "Negative Space and time (Negative Energy) ..."
A warp bubble raises the frequencies of time so that more action can take place in that field.
Relatively speaking, the same action takes place in less time.
Those are two different ways of looking at the same thing, and is also the same thing seen in two different ways. It is interchangeable when gravity (inertial mass) is not changed but requires a change of inertial mass without a change in gravity. Gravity and inertial mass are interchangeable also. There is a force generated, but under only one condition will an increased acceleration of inertial mass DECREASE the force of gravitation from increased mass.
That means that an accelerated proton would lose mass as it approaches the speed of light under this one and only condition, basically, to make that analogy. That does not violate general relativity or special relativity, but relativity is what explains the mechanism of the one-and-only condition.
Also, relatively speaking, near a black hole, the same action would take place in much more time (taking much longer).
But the conditions reverse on the other side of the event horizon. There has to be an event horizon, because there are two different frames of reality. There is no real separation though, because energy is exchanged when the existence of each other is discovered. The fact of observing such a thing means that it is not separate from the universe, but part of it.
The black hole is a gravitational vortex, with high frequency energy being released out the poles, due to the high compression of space due to gravity. It is an energy generator, a relative singularity of energy and matter creation. Around the nucleus of some distant galaxies, we can see a water membrane form around the core, comprised mainly of black holes.
Space and Time can be transformed in a warp drive. Hyperspace teleportation is the condition of having undefined space, where time approaches infinity -- the Light Drive. . . . Space and Time INTERFERE with each other (interference waves ; inversely proportional with each other ; paradoxical). Light (information) reflects back to us, information, measuring space AND time, because light is not space and time and all space and time, having no mass, and is the unity of the two as one.
. . . also see the blog post below a ways entitled, "Negative Space and time (Negative Energy) ..."
RSS Feed