I have been so very stubborn and perhaps a little on the wishful thinking about all this .. It's taken me a long time to sort this out. The updates and design improvement page, the article titled, "Physics Update: How Time Works, Mostly" has the correct account.. whereas this blog page has largely been attempting to attain a correct account, and I've made many mistakes along the way.
The LIGO observatory (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory) detected and measured the gravity waves from two black holes spinning down to collision, just like Einstein was working on with his relativity math, it even made a sound.
This is really cool! Conventionally, like in the movie "Interstellar," it is thought that time slows way down near a strong gravity source like a black hole. But, what LIGO measured was very different. LIGO detected the time waves from two rapidly spinning black holes. Time sped up a little, then slowed down a little, then sped up, and this is a wave. Time waves, rather than gravity waves.
But, it didn't take a thousand years to gradually detect that time sped up a little, and then a thousand years to detect time slowed down a little, according to what conventional Relativity would have us believe.
It shows a few things: Gravity cancellation speeds up time. Gravity can be beamed when you line up gravity-sources. Time speeds up closer to gravity in the condition of rapidly rotating and moving gravity sources.
So when you get a gravity source moving rapidly across space, spinning and rotating perhaps, essentially time normalizes with motion of gravity fields.
As a note: We can say gravity is just a byproduct of alignments of electromagnetism and inertia and mass, or we can just say that "something gravitates" rather than a mouthful. We can say time really has no axis, there really is no time, or whatever, but it's easier to just say "time waves were detected."
I don't want to get too overly complex with this. We saw an engine working -- two black holes in rapid motion around each other -- that's an engine. It shows you can use massive gravity to speed up time, not to be limited by what Special Relativity claims, that the faster something travels, the slower it actually goes [in time] (which is so lame and ludicrous).
I want to expand upon this. LIGO detected two rapidly spinning black holes, spinning down into collision.
That is an engine. It creates waves, like a wave generator. That action creates spinning gravity waves, higher and lower -- with frequency. You may could imagine how ocean waves are simulated in a wave tank of water at an amusement water-slide park, for instance.
Relativity typically claims that time slows way down near a black hole, so that if someone were there, at the black hole, one day for him would be equivalent to thousands of years on Earth.
So, time waves couldn't have been so rapidly detected, unless time sped up, the closer the black holes approached each other in motion.
This is what makes Warp Drive possible -- using a gravity engine in vortex geometry. See the top of the Warp Drive News page for what this means practically for a pilot flying in a starship, and for outside observers.
Note: it's "LIGO" for Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory. I misspelled it in the comments. OOPS. It's all over the news and internet so.. it's an easy thing to look up for your own research and verification.
Einstein got pretty close, also showing inertial fields are acceleration fields, and that is what gravity actually is. When you base matter around Light unity, then you get into quantum waves; probability waves of zero energy. No mass = no time. Rather, probable fields of infinite time. Light-space.
The universe is Light, but as a paradox of positive and negative, electric and magnetic, scalar in nature (static), but also part of the substance of the universe itself is also Mind. Consciousness.
It's harder to detect the gravity waves from our Sun, because it's not really moving around much. I'm impressed that we actually detected TIME WAVES, not so much gravity waves.
Also, I want to point out something about the GPS geo-stationary satellites around Earth. They are observed to have a right-angled gravity cancellation effect going on with them. It could merely be that they are far away from Earth gravity, that their clocks run faster. Geo-stationary satellites are the only satellites where their clocks do run faster, instead of slower as all the near-Earth orbiting satellites and space stations.
Since they are counter-acting the pull of Earth gravity by holding a distance above Earth and travelling in an orbit which holds them directly in one position over Earth, then this is a peculiar geometry. Most satellites travel very rapidly around Earth, and accordingly their clocks run slower than on Earth surface, which coincides with Special Relativity, in that their acceleration puts them in a higher frame of inertia, which equates to a higher force of gravitation since acceleration equates to gravitation, according to Einstein and has been tested and confirmed many times over the years. Thus, a higher frame of acceleration (rotation around Earth, in a circle) will incur a time penalty as our particle accelerator experiments have shown.
Geo-synchronous satellites do adjust for a faster time frequency to relay information back to Earth. The only question is, while they are in motion, they are in a static location relative to Earth, and their clock rates are faster, just the same as elevation above Earth would also change the clock rate, even though as Earth spins.
Some GPS satellite spokespersons refute the claim that the satellites' clocks do run faster. However, the satellites DO run at a faster clock rate, according to the majority of GPS satellite manufacturers.
It would take LIGO to refute their claim of discovering gravity and time waves, and they would have to say that they did not in fact detect two black holes spinning down to collision, in order for this gravity cancellation proof to be countered. Otherwise, this is heavy-duty proof in mainstream, that gravity cancellation mechanics really do increase time frequency, to an extraordinary level.
It actually is fairly common-sense however at this point, since we've had time to gel on it for a while, that gravity cancellation requires at least two massive bodies in rotation (acceleration), or at least two magneto-electrostatic di-electric generators (electromagnetic equivalency to gravitation and mass), for gravity cancellation and thus mass reduction to incur a faster temporal frequency that would allow a ship to travel faster than its inertial frequency would allow it, which equates to a ship beating the speed of light as a speed limit. Negative energy is also a factor, and that will be brought up below.
I do this work in my sleep, too. Literally. ... I keep checking and re-checking myself daily to make sure everything is correct. I have found a few absolute truths, which are defined ONLY in an engine, and how the engine works. But otherwise, Relativity is not absolute, by its very name "Relative."
There are a few things to look at with this proof.
A) Time speeds up closer to gravity -- contradiction to modern relativity, but it must be said that is the case
GENERALLY, relative to frequency. ???
* I have to make a note about this. I've been incorrect (9/1/17). Time slows down close to gravity to enact a balance, preventing matter from travelling faster than light, whereas light is our "meter stick and clock" to measure space and time-frequency. Two spinning gravitational masses can cancel the gravity waves, so that the rotating gravitational engine system speeds up time. This would have to accompany a mass reduction to achieve this, relatively. So the more true thing to say is that gravity cancellation speeds up time.
If two massive black holes can negate their time dilation, then everything changes. Rotation enables a frequency of a wave motion to be achieved.
If considering mass as waves, gravity waves and frequency, then when the energy of mass (electromagnetism, created by mass) becomes negative, then suddenly all these physics now work, according to Alcubierre, and Tesla.
B) Gravity cancellation speeds up time. ... It can also be said that negative gravity is therefore negative energy (at least a form of negative energy).
C) Gravity which makes time stand still and hardly "flowing" at all means that we can move across the vast
distance between stars very rapidly, taking very little time at all! (paradoxical; motion of a gravity source
D) The motion of two gravity sources spinning and rotating (acceleration) around each other, speeds up time, or rather negates the time dilation of slower time.
I don't know why I've been so stubborn about this, well actually I do.. It's because of negative energy frequency. In negative energy frequency conditions, then time would speed up closer to gravity, and it could be said increasing frequency will increase the speed of time. That is with negative energy conditions however, where the collapse of mass (which is the collapse of electromagnetic density, if you consider mass as a type of electromagnetic field) is involved.
Otherwise, conventionally as spacetime frequencies increase, time slows down! The only solution is as Alcubierre has stated in his warp drive metrics, is that negative energy MUST be the energy type to make warp drive work.
The reason why this works, is that the unity of matter is light. As light moves into paradoxical density (mass), creating mass, matter, space, and time, then the more mass relates to an increasing density of time, of separation from moment to moment, making time slower instead of faster. Light has zero time, simultaneous. Less mass is a bit closer to a faster simultaneous time. More mass would therefore increase the separation of matter from a light-type form of zero mass and therefore zero time, which means: more mass incurs more time.
This ALSO means that "more" time means more separation from zero-light, into densities of spacetime; making more time. So more time is slower time frequency.
Less time, ultimately becoming no time, is the ever increasing speed of time frequency, which is when the paradoxical form of matter (positive and negative, electric and magnetic, etc) incurs less separation from a light-like reality.
More mass = more time, which is the increased separation of the paradox of spacetime from a zero point of light-time (simultaneous). That gives time reality. That makes time. Time IS the separation between paradoxical events to achieve a unity event of light.
Make sense? Good.
Time speeding up approaching a gravity source is an error; however, time DOES speed up approaching the zero point of a gravity source, where the mass of an object is cancelled in the center, at the zero point. I haven't been clear about this. If you consider the mass of a star, then at the center of a star, all the mass surrounding the zero point center of the star pulls equally in all directions, cancelling gravity in the center, which is where a singularity point of zero time can exist. The singularity of zero time is a point of infinite time, not that time stands still frozen, but that all time exists all at once, and the infinite past and infinite future all converge and happens all at once.
This was one of the issues I've had with conventional relativity for some time now. This should all be much more clear, now, after this "cipher" has been established.
A gravity source would be the zero point, which is the source of time and space and electromagnetism. However, it is mass which DIRECTLY creates gravity as gravity's source. So the "Source" of gravity would therefore be the source of mass. And in that sense, then yes. Time does speed up as one approaches the source of gravity AND mass.
On this proof, it can be claimed that negative energy is technically the source of all energy and mass in the universe.... the zero point of infinite potential of energy.
Simply stated, using our rotating mercury-plasma di-electric utrons, giving them power and inertial frequency translates into an increase of mass which in gravity-cancellation geometry will give a small craft a greater force of time-dilation, or accelerated time frequency (using negative energy) other than what its rest-mass allows for. The vertical impeller, or core, allows the negative energy itself to directly translate into a creation-force of antigravitational (negative gravity) inertia (impulse). This can also get into a concept of negative inertia, as well.
Negative inertial fields wouldn't resist acceleration but would flow with acceleration. Instead of an opposing force that resists motion, g-forces wouldn't be felt by a pilot, in a negative inertial field.
All this involves physics though... Not necessarily energy and intention, nor consciousness. It is a mystery how psychic teleportation actually works, other than one's energy density must become light-like, which must involve the biological usage of negative energy, directed by mind. This borders on Ascension, to be able to achieve such a thing, which it is reported that such a thing can be achieved, and the Air Force and Chinese have been working on psychic teleportation, also that has been rumored / reported.
In that case, it can simply be stated increasing one's frequency will increase one's vibration closer to a light-body type of reality. However this must involve negative energy, which IS the natural and abundant form of energy in the universe.
In fact, our bodies are radiant systems, electrostatic systems, and use negative energy freely throughout the body, just as the Earth's surface can be tapped to be used in negative energy technology systems like the Tesla tower Ley-line negative energy power production system, recently being discussed at this website.
Also see: http://www.warp-drive-physics.com/warp-drive-blog/teslas-theory-of-electromagnetic-gravity
Tesla's theory of electromagnetic gravity .. I used an old blank draft that was back-dated without realizing that the time-stamp would place it way farther down the page, instead of right up top. It doesn't really say much, but does emphasize invention over scholastics, and back-engineering over theory. It contains several links to bring one up to par with what is commonly known about electromagnetic gravity and electromagnetic mass, but there is no real conclusion made other than what's already in places around this website. It does show that there truly does exist a relation between mass, gravity, and electromagnetism, enough to claim that electromagnetism is the basis of all fundamental forces in the universe.
It also emphasizes one specific thing: the dire need to reverse-engineer and duplicate and build the OTC-X1, which is truly a gift to all of Earth Humanity. It's inspiring.
Also, it tends to show that David Hamel's approach of using the big granite sphere spinning rapidly does not work. It would be more real if there were two spinning granite spheres around each other, rather than just one. That has been phased out, regardless in favor of the OTC-X1 platform.