updated (4/9/15)

This is a separate component which is worth some consideration.

It is integral to the outer ring drive, but there is so much to consider about the outer ring drive that separate off-shoots can spring forth from it.

The secret space program, it has been said, has been working with microwaved metal to turn it into a liquid, and then accelerated electrically to electrostatic wave speed, which are parallel waves (not in transverse like electromagnetic waves) which travel at 220,000 miles per second.

I'm curious if they've ever considered co-counter spirals of exotic liquid metal, which adds a huge inertial mass component to the concept of co-counter rotating magneto-electrostatic alternating charges. Sound waves can turn water from a water hose into a square-wave pattern, and make it appear it is flowing back upwards. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uENITui5_jU


Light as a photon has zero mass, yet is a magneto-electrostatic wave. The mass component is phased to zero (two co-counter-rotating frequencies which match 180 degrees opposite to phase the mass waveform to zero).

A ship can do that, with an exotic co-counter rotating magneto-electrostatic rings of inertial forces, exactly 180 degrees out of phase, taking the ship into pure light, able to teleport anywhere. That is beyond my technological knowledge to show how it is constructed exactly, but not beyond my ability to construct one and show how I did it; but I don't have enough resources to accomplish that at the moment; and I want to hold off until more of the world is ready for it, in a basic nutshell. As long as people are criticizing this and not helping with it, it's not worth my time.

If fit around and in place of the outer ring of the LAU-X3, all that would be needed is a small counter-inertia proton stream to counter the inner rotation of the central vertical core, like a helicopter has a back vertical rotor to keep the helicopter from spinning around and around, instead of just the blades spinning round and round. 

Of course, the vertical core can be replaced entirely, too, with exotic secret space-age technology.

Humanity is lucky the OTC-X1 was built, which came from Tesla, as his legacy to Humankind. That technology survived, luckily.

So, all this stuff is good to think about, and is words upon the page. I am fairly confident though that the secret space program (http://thepromiserevealed.com/secret-technology-photo-gallery/) will be able to develop interstellar teleportation vehicles in a very short time. ... and since people have been criticizing that link, I've posted more links on the home page, just to be an ars, showing we've already been going to other star systems for a long time, now.

(updated 11/09/2014)   RE-updated (4/3/15)


This is an important consideration and question. First of all, what exactly is electrogravity? In a nutshell, it is the usage of high volt and high frequency charges to ionize and move an air or liquid or plasma medium to harness gravitational forces to move a vehicle (vessel). Typically in an atmospheric craft, the positive charge is on one end, and the negative on the other. The craft moves in the direction of the positive charge, and the air or plasma material moves toward the negative charge/pole. The air flow is a thrust, yet consequentially to its motion, creates a gravity force behind it due to an overall unified inertial field of mass at very high energy and speed. E=MC^2. 


Recently, with the new addition of the page "Updates and Design Improvements," Townsend Brown's technology came to light. That includes the "Stressing of the Di-electric" concept which includes a di-electric material between capacitor plates (positive and negative charge), to operate. With that in mind, that also adds to a new dynamic of an achievement of electrogravity. 

There are many different ways to achieve it, as seen here, yet the conditions are always the same. 

The general conditions are: time slows down all around, in the reality outside the ship's immediate space, whereas time speeds up on board, and within the ship's immediate space. No inertial G-forces are physically felt in the ship, the pilot doesn't feel the ship's motions, and won't feel any tight 90 degree angle cornering, or any sudden acceleration and deceleration. 

. . .


It has been claimed that Nikola Tesla's electrogravity designs used charged hull plates all over the hull, 6 inches of a air gap at the equator (horizontal; latitudally) between plates, and 4 inches of air gap between the plates (longitudinally, or the vertical gaps). Ceramic material was on the outside of the charge plates, acting as armor and allowing the magnetic field to penetrate, and preventing carbon buildup shorting out the plates. Yet, it is such an idea to use plates that can be charged to move a ship electrogravitically to fly very fast in an atmosphere without a buildup of friction or heat on the hull.

I wish to point out that Tesla had used rotating electromagnetic AC charges. And, I wish to point out the nature of the electromagnetic wave being used, not necessarily electro-statically "hard-connected" to the air outside the ship as in a conventional understanding of electrogravity as using the charge force, rather than the magnetic force. He used charged plates, but with a ceramic covering on the outside.

In that sense, look at the benefit of those two styles, as a redundancy-engine feature using rotating AC magnetic forces (like John Searl used), vs AC forces of electrical charge!

That is a point to remember when reading this website. The X-1 uses co-counter-rotating AC electromagnetic fields. So does the outer ring, but it also uses magneto-electrostatic forces! 

Simple electrogravity is achieved in an atmosphere by charging the outside of the hull with electro-(magnetic)-static energy, and the air from the atmosphere of a planet then speeds around the ship, ionized from the ship, and that force harnessed by the outside hull rather than like the space shuttle merely being subject to those forces of ionized friction of atmosphere upon re-entry.

That makes for a nice redundant engine feature.

A proton moving at near light speed is an energy of inertia, an energy of mass and charge in motion. Mass approaches near infinite proportions as it approaches the limit of "light speed," where it will never go faster than light because its mass will start to increase exponentially. So obviously E (Energy) of volts, frequency, and inertia is an energy of substance, mass, charge, magnetic field, and solidity. How can energy be solid like an object when energy itself is without substance? The answer: the very substance of the universe is Energy.

It does not mean that the air will travel at near light speeds around the hull, just very fast. Fast enough to fly at a couple hundred thousand miles per hour without a problem of heat on the hull. There's no heat because there's no resistance. The air vibrates at the same vibration as the hull plating. It's not the same as slamming into still air at high speeds; the air is energized to flow over the hull. This is true when using di-electric materials in between the positive and negative charges of the layers of hull plating, but there can also be air flow around the ship.

There should be air flow around the ship, because the electrogravity hull plating is also used as shielding against high energy cosmic rays and proton storms from stars. That means the charge of the hull plating will affect the space around the ship at electrical frequency. It doesn't have to, but that's how it's designed throughout the website, so I'm not going to change anything now.

To be more specific, the air flow will be there, but that is a secondary force and effect. The "stressing of the di-electric" actually accelerates the mass of the di-electric, causing gravitation. That's the primary force of such electrogravity applications ...

Yet . . . It must be said . . . Light is the unity of energy (and matter). All is Light. What is light, is another question. Light is heat. The Space Shuttle vents heat as light through the radiators in the cargo bay, while in space since there is no atmosphere to conduct heat.


. . .


I used the sphere of granite to understand how gravity would be felt on board a ship, if at all, in deep space, to start learning about that. It appears there will be a natural on-board gravity on the ship, through several reasons, including the spinning X-1 disk below. If it is strong enough to overcome Earth gravity, then it is strong enough to generate an Earth gravity on-board condition, even if the engine is turned on in a heavy-gravity planet environment.

However using di-electric resonance, it can be seen how gravity plating can be used, and just kept charged by the ship's engines.


When I contemplated the onboard gravity thinking about how the sphere worked, I had the floors cambered in a fairly pronounced arch to make it happen. Then I started learning more about this stuff and found out it was more of a natural by-product of directed inertia in geometries. 

Regarding a pilot experiencing G-forces, the pilot would not experience any g-forces taking sharp 90 degree turns at fast speeds, because the craft flies in its own independent gravity spacetime field. I get into a lot of this stuff in my book. It might be a bit too much information to explain on a website. I'm mainly concerned with just the engines and the physics itself more importantly.

We stand on the surface of Earth and don't feel Earth spinning at 2,000 miles per hour, after all. We don't feel the inertia of being thrown against the wall as the Earth rotates around the Sun. We stand on a relative field of a frame of gravity, independent of how Earth moves around in space. 

The craft uses its inertial energy field to travel through other inertial energy fields (fields of gravity). A car or jet aircraft does not create a gravity field with which it uses to travel, it travels through Earth gravity field, although not independent of Earth's gravity field.

The ship doesn't use wings to fly, it uses gravity fields to fly. Those inertial energy fields are kind of like wings, but I don't want to confuse people. 

Furthermore, the ship vibrates faster than solid matter anyway. You would feel no impact with another object, because the X ships more in independent gravity (inertial) fields, independent OF gravity fields. As long as the inertia of the engines is in motion, it can be free to fly up, down, left, right, straight, like how a box would fly. John Searl's experiences with his crafts too, and he was taking on passengers and large additions were being built at a few English airports to accommodate his crafts, the pilots and passengers felt no accelerations and g-forces.

If you CAN take a sharp 90 degree turn at mach 3, and it doesn't tear the aircraft apart, then it surely won't tear the Human body apart, because such a turn would be like hitting a solid brick wall. 

How much does an airplane weigh with 500 chickens on board? Will it weigh the same if all 500 chickens were flying around in the plane? Yes, because that airplane would have an increased mass value due to all those chickens, flying around or sitting (and standing). Putting 500 chickens on board a jumbo jet would increase the jet's mass. It would weigh the same if the chickens were all in cages on board, or standing on the seats, or flying around not touching the sides.

It's like asking how much helium does it take for you to have one pound of that gas? How do you weigh helium balloon if it lifts off from the scales? 

These are interesting questions though. If a chicken could fly as fast as a jumbo jet, it could keep from being pressed against the back of the seat when the jet takes off. Even though you are moving at hundreds of miles per hour though, a chicken can fly faster than a jet simply taking off from the back of the airplane and flying to the front of the plane. These are also speed of light questions.

If a rocket ship is flying just under the speed of light, then if you shine a flashlight from the back of the rocket ship to the front, that beam of light will still travel at 186,000 miles per second from the back of the rocket to the front.

These are all examples of paradoxes.

The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states you can't measure where an electron is simultaneous to which direction and how fast it's moving. You can only measure where it is, OR what direction and how fast it's moving, not both at once. That is also a paradox.

The only way you won't feel yourself being thrown back against the chair when the hyperdrive kicks in, is if gravity pull in front of the ship is equal to the force of accelerating up to speed. 

As, for example in atmospheric electrogravity using charged plates to "fly" a ship in Earth's atmosphere, the air is supercharged into ions, diverting electrons and propelling protons very rapidly from the front of a flying electrogravity ship to the back, becoming ionized, and then meeting up with electron pairs behind the ship, normalizing and neutralizing again after the ship has flown by. So if you put a positive high volt/high frequency charge on front (leading edge) of an airplane's wings, and a negative on the trailing edge of the wings, air is ionized and propelled better than any jet engine. But, it's not quite the same.

The charged air picks up more mass energy, because now that inertia of a charged force is also moving very rapidly. The effect of large mass forces (inertia and motion) is exactly what gravity is.

So as the ship takes those right angled turns, it's falling into a gravity pocket the whole way, equalizing the force of a sudden change of vector, a sudden acceleration, to a zero state so the pilot would feel NO g-forces or forces of inertia and acceleration.

The charged proton at very high volt/frequency moving at very high speeds makes gravity directed in opposite to where it's going. Like how a jet accelerating forward throws you back to the seat, or how a centrifuge throws you to the side walls and you don't slide down.. If you're tiny and in front of a proton when it's flying at high speeds, you'll be forced back against that proton..  that is which way the polarity of gravity is oriented. The proton makes gravity behind where it's inertia is directing it to go. 

Super particle colliders and accelerators, they are huge tubes that stretch for miles around in a circle. They get protons up near light speed, and the mass gets so high, it causes the whole ground all in that area to shake. Meanwhile, a 40 foot Tesla tower can cause the ground to shake on its own from forces of electrical resonance, without even using a battery, just powered by the Earth's own electrical field.



Flying in an independent inertial field (altering temporal frequency) would not be affected by the inertia of surrounding space, or other bodies and mass-objects. It would be one with inertia itself, there would be no objects that could solidly affect inertia upon the ship in an independent inertial field. It would appear invisible to all but of a similar vibration. 




So why would on-board gravity be felt? Well in a charged field where positive is up and negative is down that's making gravity and inertia, wouldn't that polarity of gravity be felt? Would the field of gravity be "magnetized" and captured in the inertial energy bubble of an X class ship when running (in motion)?

Well, if all flight gravity forces was relative to a zero point, and that zero neutral point condition is Earth-like gravity, then those gravity forces would all be in balance when the craft flies around in planets and in space.

Certainly something to consider none-the-less . . .

UPDATED!!!!   x4  (RE-RE-RE-Updated) !!!!!

(11/05/14)


I thought I'd post this. It's food for thought. It has good magnetic engine geometry. There would have to be appropriate timing for a Bedini style setup. Otherwise, if there were no timing, it could follow another style of all-magnetic motors. I should find a video, but magnetic wheels can spin themselves with very, very high acceleration and speed, but very, very, very low torque. In this case, a fast acceleration would be ideal, to create a high frequency magneto-electrostatic field. That would make for a good outer ring drive setup, Tesla style, to increase the frequencies of the internal engines of the LAU-X3.

Please be patient, the photo may take a while to load.

There is an outer ring and an inner ring, both toroid spiral shapes which spin against and counter with each other; dual rotors. It's a similar concept to the X-1 engine itself, but is only an electrical and inertial field generator. When powered up, the two donuts spin counter to each other (the outer and inner donuts). As the field coils pass each other, it creates a reflexive action to shape a wave form of very high volts and frequency. The energy going into it can be amplified very easily. To note, the inner toroid is actually inside the outer toroid. 

Actually, the design is balanced; it needs to be imbalanced. A Balance is when a force or forces act upon something to keep it stable within inherently unstable conditions. Certainly timed pulses would work efficiently on two 12-pointed inner/outer toroid field coils, again, similar to the X-1 engine, but without the capacitor plates connecting the outside components to the central core. Instead of a spiral, independent coils around a 12-point geometry could be timed to accelerate -- Bedini-style -- to a fast speed, creating huge flyback voltage and reflexing with each other, creating a field and overcharge. It would spin at a steady speed eventually, but everything inside the outer ring (the vertical core and lower X-1) could build up more energy.

I've been working a long time on primarily the physics involved in actually achieving warp drive, or FTL, or light-speed. That's the reason I wanted to do this, because if the physics are well established, and it is known what it takes to achieve the technology and design, then things would just be easier overall.

Of course each step achieved leads to a further realization and understanding of the whole. 

I'm thinking of using individual coils instead of a spiral shape. 12 individual angled coils, and 12 counter-angled inside them. Frankly, utrons can be used on the inside (or some other electret/living energy power source), around a spinning track. It's just an idea, something of an inkling of what to shoot for. The only reason I'm getting ahead of myself like this, is just to put an idea there to hold the space, so to speak. It's similar to the X-1, even employing capacitors inside the hull spaces..  using the vertical core as the central accumulator in that system. 


Update: I apologize for making so many changes all the time. I have come to realize about Rotating Alternating Charges. The outer ring geometry MUST be 12 points within 12 points, co-counter rotating, and NOT be 13 points, because of the necessity of Co-Counter Rotating Alternating Charges. (only an even number of coils can be used with AC)   (See: Warp Drive Engineering page for more information)


That is the secret, and the Key to working with the energies of time and gravity. And remember, even in rotating AC fields, there is a positive and a negative. See: Tesla Engineering Physics, in reference to the AC charge field being polarized to put the charge on the ceiling or on the floor. There is polarity to rotating AC charges.




DC polarity:  The picture above is in DC polarity, not AC. In DC polarity, it could still create AC power from electromagnetic field generation and collapses (it collapses in the opposite polarity), and so it should be considered, and not just thrown away.



I've tried to consider all this from every possible angle, just to somewhat cover circumstances that could crop up during a construction phase, and also to show what can be done from an engineering standpoint. The physics are just as important, and so it helps to have something to be able to see. Many things I just cannot even touch here, because I KNOW that things ALWAYS change going from paper to constructed device. The engineering handles the "what if's," but the physics handles the principles, concepts, laws of how the universe operates, and all that so we CAN build. 







Update: To balance the inertial forces of the vertical spinning core, directional flow ports can be vented to the outer ring spinning in opposite to the vertical core. The outer ring drive has an inner vortex core and an outer vortex core, spiraled around the inner core. They both spin opposite to each other, and are in "interference" with each other, meaning the inside and outside are spiraled in difference directions. The outer core is the easiest to access, and easier to tune. Air ported from the central vertical engine to the outer core of the outer ring drive can be electrically charged into motion, to create a counter-balance. 


With all three engines spinning and able to generate electricity, there should be enough power to create this counter-balance effect.

Otherwise, the outer ring needs to accelerate its own inner and outer air flows in co-counter spiraled rotation. So what would balance the inner core?  This is the only issue I have found, and is why the starship Enterprise had two warp nacelles. 

The whole cockpit might have to be able to counter rotate (so the pilots will be sitting still while portions of the ship spins around them), like in the OTC-X1 and just let the ship torque a little. It won't torque much, because of the outer ring co-counter spinning, and the lower X-1 engine co-counter spinning. A mono-pole is the unidirectional polarity of a gravity engine. 

The secret space program uses something similar to an outer ring, but with exotic liquid metal matter sped up to light speeds (possible 220,000 miles per second, electrostatic wave speed). Thus, the ship can fly at those speeds, able for the ship's own independent inertia to travel in those frequencies (at those speeds). 

With a good power supply, those rings can be oval shaped, and two counter-spinning vertical cores used in the middle. But, that is beyond my own technology level. 

It is still a hypothesis that with the outer ring in motion, and with the X-1 engine in motion, that the vertical core would not cause there to be a need to counter-balance the ship at all, and would fly very precisely with a spinning gravitational mono-pole in the middle, coming out 90 degrees from the plane of the counter-rotational toroidal fields.


That's the importance of the outer ring. Otherwise the air/plasma flow would have to accelerate straight down the tube, and out and around the hull of the ship, through the outer rings to break up and phase out the inertia, and then back around the hull and straight down accelerated through the tube again.

I like the vertical cones, though. The universe moves like that. It wouldn't really work too well, if the outer ring wasn't co-counter rotating at the same speeds, unless they are co-counter rotated at Pythagorean perfect note scaled harmonics (one at a harmonic slower than the other), where the wave would be aligned to better provide stability, as well as vibrate at a harmonic which allows luminal flight.



It seems obvious that the ship would only fly at light speeds, with just an X-1 co-counter rotating disk, or just a secret space program "dual 1/2 spin exotic matter ring" system, if what they ("John" from the secret space program) say is true. But with a gravity drive like similar to the vertical core, there can be the conventional warp flight dynamics, pushing the LAU-X3 beyond the speed of light. "Warp speed, Mr. Scott!"


And too, there would be resonance between the lower X-1 drive, and the outer ring drive. Resonance amplifies the energy. Resonance brings the shape of the field into a higher frequency. Sympathetic resonance is like when someone yells into one end of the piano, and all the strings vibrate all the way to the other end of the piano. Sympathetic resonance of space and time, co-counter resonating magneto-electrostatic inertial forces, would increase (amplify) the energy, and raise the frequency of time, and of that space of time.






UPDATE 4:


The forces from the inner vertical core, if in centripetal, would be a force brought into balance within itself. An outward centrifugal force on the vertical core housing would be a force that acts "one with another," acting upon the ship to establish equilibrium, putting a slight torque on the ship causing it into a slight spin.

Rotating AC fields inside the core could cause the proton ionized plasma flow to spin inward upon itself to achieve equilibrium with inner and outer rotational forces to the ship.


Very often, new technologies are developed to achieved desired results where older technologies fall short. Sometimes, it's the older technologies which give us the greatest insights, and strangely work in the more efficient ways. There are some things the digital age just can't do, that analogue can do better. 


If we know what we want to achieve, and it is deemed possible in theory and in physics, then there is always a way to build anything to accomplish the desired goal.







See the comments for additional information about inertial balances of inside and outside forces.