Here is a bit of a proof of concept for the air space employed in the LAU-X4, using very low pressure air or gas, to form a plasma. Also, it covers dielectric solids for use in electro-gravity experiments, showing a gravity pocket forms above the plasma.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701091.pdf
The only difference is that this uses ELF (extremely low frequency) dielectric charge plates conducting current or a charge field at ELF radio wave transmission and reception (wireless beaming). ELF radio wave transmission is the result of the charged plates, and is also reminiscent of usage of radio waves to excite salt water, causing the salt water to combust, as per an article lower down on this page.
The material plasma is also electrified from standard house current, and then the ELF electric field is applied to it. One thing I've learned is that two systems must have energy for overall dynamic systems to work correctly, instead of just one system applying charge to both.
The LAU-X4 uses high frequency, but in similar arrangements, so the pdf is worth a look; and it shows that the system can maintain its own air-space, and work in a vacuum, "packing its own air with it."
These are not new concepts at all. This website discusses these concepts in great detail. The only difference is the use of ELF, but also it shows a few clear mechanisms, schematics, and mathematical theory. In fact, further into the article, it DOES discuss experiments that DO use high frequency energy to also achieve gravitation fields.
This paper shows electrostatic lifter technology can work in a vacuum, so as long as its air is contained within it's own space, in an air-tight container.
This paper shows relationship with Biefeld-Brown, or Townsend Brown similarities using dielectric mass.
Using ELF however seems to me to be an inefficient use of power systems, because excitation of plasma may occur at various resonance harmonics, whereas ELF is only ONE such resonant harmonic, but harmonics should also exist in higher frequencies, where energy production in a spacecraft can be much more efficient and compact when using negative energy generating overunity.
This paper also shows that these results cannot be understood in a framework of General Relativity. Also, this paper shows some relations concerning virtual graviphotons. There is no speed limit for virtual photons. However, as shown by Eric Dollard, at simultaneous speeds and distance, the scalar and longitudinal aspect of magneto-electrostatic interactions (negative energy) producing photons -- in that energy type, there also can be photons having no speed limit, and an unlimited distance, and able to carry energy over that distance -- as well as having a much higher energy output -- as in phenomenally higher energy output, of which virtual particles do not have a phenomenally high energy output.
As stated, this is nothing really new to what we have already known, discussed on this website. These results of gravitation are slight, but showing within a gram or so weight reduction in some cases, and higher and lower in other cases, even upwards of several grams. This adds further validation to the LAU-X4 spacecraft, and the OTC-X1.
This paper also shows that the inertial properties of a spacecraft can be reduced (inertial cancellation, ultimately).
However, this paper does not show usage of negative energy characteristics; although does discuss virtual particles -- photons and graviphotons as sources of simultaneous information transmission at any distance with no speed limit, and energy is exchanged. This would serve more as a quantumly entangled source of hyperspace communication (something that I had discussed on the warp drive news page, but was so incidental that I think I deleted it). Now, there is an actual mechanism for this communication system.
I still think that the approaches of generating negative energy with very high energy output shown on this website is a better approach to generating gravity fields, inertial cancellation fields, and time-warp fields, also which General Relativity cannot be used to describe and understand these mechanisms.
Finally, this paper also shows the same things about Newtonian physics that I have also brought up, that not only does Newtonian physics NOT include any concept of gravity waves (which have been discovered by science, and is currently accepted as existing), BUT ALSO, the concept of mass in Newtonian physics is a thing that never changes, whereas in General Relativity (Einsteinan physics), mass is known to change, along with time, which are things that Newtonian physics cannot describe, and such things cannot be understood through Newtonian physics. Inertial and gravity cancellation also cannot be understood through Newtonian physics.
We're at a point now where we have surpassed Newtonian and Einsteinean physics altogether. General and Special Relativity does not even touch these new realities of mass reduction and gravity cancellation; although Relativity however does allow for changes of mass and changes of gravitation, and changes of temporal frequency.
But as evident as the miles of text below in these Relativity articles, no solution is easily found in that framework of General and Special Relativity, because as we have exceeded the speed of light to a considerable degree using waveforms and energy; and with mass reduction using negative energy, General and Special Relativity will continue to be violated, as it is not able to go past a certain point, the more we understand about warp drive. I am pleased to see that more physicists are in agreement there.
I hate to use the term, "violated," because that implies that there is something that exists that upholds absolute reality, whereas upon violation, there is violation upon absolute reality instead of merely accepting an evolution and furthering understanding of a process of science.
And too, overunity and reactionless free energy is now shown to exist, and has been proven. Such pages as the Free Energy / Tesla page of this website do show this proof.
Because of that, and the above, our physics are now changed, and many outdated laws of physics are now null and void. Energy CAN be created as our physics and current levels of technology in the public, do show.
It must be repeatedly said, that the electret is the electrostatic equivalent of the magnet, and that an electret can create electrical current for hundreds of years at least (if well constructed) which is reactionless, and yet where does the mass come from since electrons are shown to have mass? So this basic simple concept is the simple concept of the creation of mass; and as a di-electric material, has unique properties and value in the realm of experimental gravitational propulsion.
. . .
.... Also, THIS is rather noteworthy:
http://www.free-energy-info.com/Issue15.pdf
This was published in 2004, but discusses everything here at this website. Some things predominantly noteworthy are the things that the search engine results are calling "pseudoscience" is really the same things postulated and revealed by some rather famous Ph.D. holders in physics. So, NOT pseudoscience, thank you very much.
This pdf is actually a culmination of everything antigravity and energy related as a pretty massive resource that further validates everything. at. this. website.
I've actually run across some of this stuff on this pdf article before. It includes every piece of physics required to reproduce the OTC-X1, and even going beyond that. Such things included are the nature of macro-quantum spin torsion fields (fields generated by spinning mass, gravitational in nature; also including spirals and flat disks), vacuum mechanics, CSE (cavity structural effect; I forget what the acronym stands for; resonance cavity-based gravity/antigravity), an early version of the EM drive using microwave impulse, Townsend Brown asymmetrical capacitor systems, elimination of electrostatic drag (not quite the same thing as the "Lenz Buster" in the MVP pulse motor), the homopolar dynamo, and other stuff.
Here's a quote from the first article in the pdf:
"For 20 years, torsion fields and torsion generators have been widely used to create torsion energy sources, torsion transport, torsion metallurgy, torsion systems of data transfer communication, torsion systems of medical diagnostics, etc. [10]. The feasibility and practical effectiveness of torsion fields has been experimentally proved in a number of areas of application. In some fields, that use torsion technologies (such as nuclear waste processing), a scientific foundation has been laid and preliminary experimental results have been achieved. Technological experience has been gained in some areas."
So it seems that "torsion fields" are not pseudoscience, at all, as per the common search engine results will tell you!! This has got me rather mad, in fact that valid science in use today in MANY technological capacities (torsion = vortex) is verifying and validating torsion fields, when everything you read on the Google search engine pops out articles saying it's "crackpot pseudoscience" upon doing a search to learn what "torsion fields" are!!!
This actually pisses me off that the Google search engine results are obviously and purposefully skewed! Is there an obvious relation between magneto-electrostatic torsion fields, and gravity fields?? If, as per Ed Leedskalnin's experiments showed, that electromagnetism interacts at right angles to the plane of a gravity field, then why can't a gravity field also be created by electromagnetic fields? Well they can, as the top pdf shows!
Now we come along and introduce spin, which is a force of acceleration geometrically, in a resonance cavity (the hull of the craft), and we could very well be looking at a gravitational engine in the OTC-X1.
RSS Feed