In a simultaneous co-counter rotating field of gravitation, it would do no good to make a vertical engine core also in co-counter rotation. Polarization is rotation in one way only. And so the vertical core also polarizes the top half of the warp drive vortex in the center of the Outer Ring engine, and above the Central Accumulator -- monopolar. Polarization of a simultaneous field is the idea. 

Polarization of electrostatic creates an electromagnet. 

Magneto-electrostatic polarization of light is mass.

Note increased inertial gravitational frequency in the Core, and increased negative gravitation at the outer circumference -- a negative warp bubble, while also including additional (increasing) vortex polarity of accelerating mass.

It occurs to me that not everyone knows who Nikola Tesla was. He was the most brilliant scientific genius of all time. He gave us our modern world. 

He created AC power generation, and refined the DC power systems. He gave us wireless transfer of power, wireless communication, radio communication, the foundation of Radar and advanced beam weapons, remote control, robotics, television, perfected the light bulb. He created the technology of hydro-electric power, geo-thermal power generation, and was responsible for the construction of the power generator system of Niagara Falls ..  fluid hydrodynamics, he harnessed the secrets of lightning and power generation from no moving parts. He developed micro mechanical resonance devices that could create huge Earthquakes. He was able to beam a huge amount of energy to Russia. He created the basis of stargates, and was able to transfer a huge amount of electricity anywhere in the world, and beyond the world. He also gave us antigravity technologies, the basis for time travel and warp drive. He was the leading scientist at the Philadelphia Experiment, but the govt and military wouldn't listen to him, and that's why the accident (it wasn't Tesla's fault, even though he designed the engines and equipment). Tesla's accomplishments are nearly endless. When I say he gave us our modern world, he literally did.

Tesla's science was where HAARP came from, death rays and even power generation from radioactive sources. He was involved in the first implementation of a nuclear bomb. He knew of technology that was extraordinarily dangerous, and extraordinarily beneficial. He was a great philanthropist with the world's best interest always in his heart and mind.

Tesla said, "if you want to understand the secrets of the universe, think in terms of frequency, vibration, and energy."

There's a brief introduction to Tesla, just in case no one knew about him. He was the greatest scientific mind of all time, and is suspiciously absent from our history books. When he died, all his technology and property was confiscated under the "Alien Information Protection Act." He was one of the most brilliant scientists in all of history, and his accomplishments is one of the greatest cover-ups of all times.

Luckily, his X-1 designs survived through Otis T. Carr, and so now we have "warp drive physics" and "hyperdrive teleportation physics."



Now, let's get to the important stuff about frequency and vibration.


. . .


. . .  If I have said "because of the frequency of the engines" anywhere, I really am implying the frequency vibration of the ship, including the shape of the ship structure acting like a conductive speaker box (a super-conductive speaker box would be better).

The dimension of vibration should be introduced formally in these physics so that it is not mis-construed the nature of an energy field without conductive resonance properties to the entirety of the ship itself. The ship has to be able to resonate with the wave-frequencies of, and generated by the engines.

The more right angles on a ship, the less resonance. The more little separate doo-dads protruding from the ship, or a more complex ship hull design, would definitely lower the resonance.

The concept of relativity, and concepts of Gravitation should be well known by now. Frequency relativity is expressed in a totally different geometry than general and special relativity; but as long as there is all of that, then everything can back each other up and reinforce the existences of each other.


It may still be difficult to understand how the engines work, as far as how you move a spark in many dimensions to warp time and space and create gravitation and to vibrate very rapidly, and quickly, and at a super-high sound that seems to be another form of matter and existence in its own right.


If we look at it as vibration, instead of as raw heavy super-massive destructive gravity forces, then we can truly see the elegance of such a music. 

That is what frequency is doing, which results in gravitation. But it's all frequency. Gravitation is no more than vibration.

Onboard gravity is due to the vibration of the X-1 disk underneath the cockpit. The resonance is due to the utrons and electromagnets co-counter-rotating. The hull shape is how that resonance is conducted, as is the central accumulator on the inside of the hull, with a shape of its own in the geometry of two "light-cones" stuck together, to use relativity terms.

What resonates is magneto-electrostatic frequencies, in frequencies of rotation and co-rotation. Those frequencies are an expression of a design of matter and mass, in vibration, as a unified energy.

That's the concept.

The vertical core vibration, and the Outer Ring vibration, is a frequency of unity, which is light, which is matter and mass, charge, geometry, a frequency of space itself. At high frequency, even if an electrical current is a million volts, it will harmlessly glance over the pilot's skin as a whispy plasma. As mass and inertia is also involved, then it is the frequency of matter and reality and space, of the energy of that frame of shape and solidity, which is that force-field of energy which is matter; and vibrating at a higher frequency, the matter of the starship is changed, and gravitates and vibrates at a higher vibration, including the pilots.

The frequency of the vibration of that ship-energy-matter-mass solid "thing" which does the thing that it does to define itself, which is vibrating mass, is the acceleration of the frequency of the vibration mass! When you are also vibrating at the same rate as the particle accelerator, then you really don't feel any affects from a near-by proton zipping by your head at light speed, because you would also be vibrating at light speed, and the proton would be a little small harmless speck.

The ship can vibrate at frequencies that are harmonics of the speed of light to achieve an overall vibration of light, which is the beauty of Tesla physics.

So, merely realizing the key of the concept of "Vibration and Frequency" makes it easy to see how the gravity forces of the ship won't tear itself apart, nor be harmful to the pilots. I hope that clears up that ramble that's in a few other places and posts.

It also presents us another paradox! Yay! How, if the ship is vibrating so rapidly, and the pilots aren't feeling gravity forces, how is the ship actually generating gravitation??

It might take me a week to answer that question, and I hope I don't have to update half the website because of the answer. Or I could take a shortcut. It's not. But it is! It's all relative.

And that's what's so kewl about it!


Tesla said if you want to know how the Universe works, think of the Universe in terms of "Frequency, Vibration, and Energy."


IF the pilots couldn't feel the gravity forces then they would have to come up with a new type of physics on their own, to help them understand what was going on. It would have to deal with frequency and vibration, and  "Energy-motion."

It would involve the movement of frequency space, and the movement of frequency within space, directions of frequencies of matter and inertial "temperment."

Electrostatic energy from a wide squirrel cage balanced on a vertical pole will beam straight up and down in a column that is just as wide as the squirrel cage. Here's another peculiar dimension of action of the vertical core which pulls a beam of space into the core, pulling the starship along like a gravitational airplane propeller.

It could also be claimed that it adds a frequency on top of the Central Accumulator that extended the frequencies of the top half of the Accumulator into a distance of space, giving it a lift on that side according to the frequency of the vibration.

I should stop right there, and let that sink in.

The vertical core uses internal forces of frequency and vibration upon the central accumulator to stretch the central accumulator through space on one side, generating electrical lift.


. . .


The Outer Ring drive, and the X-1 outer engine-action also can be considered in geometry. The Outer Ring is above and wider than the X-1 engine. That makes another cone shape of energy. However, the overall field relation can be seen in the Walter Baumgartner images in the downloadable on the Home page, but I will post them here.

The disappearance of rotation in the electric poles is the de-polarization of magnetic forces due to co-counter-spinning rotations of polar magnetic forces in the case of transforming between an electromagneto-static (magneto-electrostatic) wave, and an electrostatic wave. Note the degeneration of mass along the outer equatorial edge and along the equatorial plane, and the accumulation of mass in the center and at the poles. This is describing Inertial Discplacement in spherical geometry fields. This also explains why the vertical core can extend the mass displacement (mass = energy of inertial frequency) of the Central Accumulator that operates within a spherical field of the radius of the X-1 horizontal disk and electromagnet perimeter-edge.

It is also describing a negative energy warp bubble. Things to note are the presence of di-electric fields, and height of electro-magnetic poles.


However, there is another way to look at this: the frequencies of inertial forces and gravitation. Electrical co-counter rotation of increased frequencies of gravitation is what we're looking at -- a spacetime gravitational warp bubble achieved by electrical frequencies and mass rotation. It's the energy of mass which starts to phase to zero in magneto-electrostatic vibration (speeds, and frequency of vibration). Vibration is the speed of motion of each atom, and of all atoms. Everything vibrates; everything is in motion, and moves or otherwise "vibrates" and "is."

On the Home page, the concepts of Relative Acceleration and Relative Deceleration are applied in Special Relativity, and it is seen how the OTC-X1 co-counter- rotation is a Relative Acceleration, and increases the frequency of Gravitation.

Gravitation is also inertial resonance in a magneto-electrostatic field, in the case of the X-1 engine.

The field mechanics of gravitation should be easy to see with the LAU-X3 systems, upon examining this website.

I wanted to make note of this one particular concept, because I think it is the key to understanding a more advanced form of unified physics. 

Resonance deals with time, motion, and unity. Volts increase when the electromagnetic current is in resonance through the bundles of coils in a generator -- the more windings of the coil(s) makes higher volts, in time with the oscillation of each magnetic pole. The more magnets around a rotor, the more high volts can be made with more ... higher frequency. Resonance. (frequency: in like a 2 phase AC generator with a coil wound around 10 posts around the rotor -- a complete circle wound around one post, then the other, etc. Each circle has to flow in the same direction of the current -- each post is wound the opposite way -- or it cancels the polarities and nothing happens; if you have 10 magnets N-S-N-S-N-S ... etc, around a stator, then every 36 degrees around a circle, as it spins, there is one-half wavelength, when the circle rolls back up to North again, it will have completed a 360 degree rotation; get it up to spin really fast, higher volts, and also higher frequency, because the time between each magnet becomes less; the faster it spins, the higher the frequency (time of each coil passing a magnet) x the number of times the coil is wound in a circle (volts). Basically.) 

Resonance however is not linear. Instead of just one thing determining change, now there's two things and also 2 dimensions of travel (around and around in a circle, thus with a form of an area of a circle equation).

Resonance of accelerating forces (accelerating forces: seen in equations in the form of f=ma^2) are seen as the space shuttle flies around the Earth, and also as the Earth spins. Resonance in this case is the multiplication of accelerating forces ... but also with positive and negative values and squares and square roots that we won't get into in any complexity. Those are inertial forces and frequencies that warp time, and thus is an increase of mass, or relative decrease of mass, depending on if the space shuttle is orbiting westward (chasing the sun) or eastward respectively. If a thousand space shuttles were all spinning in the same orbit, equally spaced out, you could start thinking about how the Earth can be moved around like a space ship using some exotic ring-engine.

It couldn't fly too fast, but it could fly around the solar system, faster in places and slower closer to the sun. 

The LAU-X3 could move faster since it is also directing gravity force into the "Eye of the Dragon." (the vortex).

An increase in mass, or a decrease in mass is proportional to the increase or decrease in gravitation. Acceleration = Gravitation.


In resonating electromagnetic fields of inertia, in vortex geometry, it raises up the dimensions, unifying the field in a geometrical shape that can resonate with vacuum space more directly. 


A central accumulator's role is now more obvious. An increase in frequency (the compression of the wave in time), and depolarization of accelerating inertial mass, or rather not "depolarization" but a compressing force against the outside perimeter of the engine squeezes the inertia to the center, electromagnetically conducted by inertial polarities (zero polarity around the perimeter, and "one" in the center). We could claim it to be a negative "one" because it represents the negative energy of inertial reduction, and thus mass reduction around the outer field of the starship.

After all, there is a NASA model of a warp drive starship design with an outer ring, and a football-shaped central accumulator.

[Inertial] Displacement: The inertial force around the perimeter displaces itself, and it has to accumulate in the center, because that's the only place it can accumulate -- transverse to the circumference. That's the only direction the inertial force can travel; it is a re-polarization of inertial forces that can satisfy NASA's requirement for a negative energy value that is also in a theoretical range of General and Special Relativity; rather what Relativity claims is possible, and in particular in a "bubble" around the starship.

It is the "warp bubble" itself that has the negative energy value. It can also apply similarly to the vertical core, compressing the space in front of the starship even further by using the addition of that engine, rather than just using a single-axis plane that does not make use of the height of the origin as a dimensional expansion.


. . .


Time Dilation:  According to Ralph Ring, 15 minutes can pass on the OTC-X1 to 1 second on Earth, as it felt to him (even though the OTC-X1 is known more for teleportation, the time frequency must be faster to allow for travel within a range of a space-distance of 1 second; and also that can easily be understood as the frequency or strength of the warp bubble generated to allow for an inertial force such as a vertical engine to propel a craft in the fashion of a warp drive; so there are different "flight modes" possible using the same physics). That puts the ship in a much higher time frequency, much faster than the speed of light at full speeds at such a high frequency. That gives re-assurance to the design of the LAU-X3 being more cost-efficient to construct and test, then that of some more elaborate level of sophistication. It makes for a very, VERY strong warp-bubble. It doesn't quite take time to zero or infinity, due to it's finite level of RPMs (only 680 RPM to achieve high frequency teleportation), but through resonance with the vertical core helping to build up the speed of the lower X-1 engine, and working in tandem with the outer ring both to generate even MORE speed, and also to field-resonate the gravitational fields together, then it makes for a very spectacularly fast ship! 

Including the resonance increase of field energy from the [electrical and protonic] charged particle flow through the vertical and outer ring engines, it could well exceed NASA's time-table for travel to our closest star on some orders of magnitude making for the pilots to experience a simple weekend trip, or even hours (NASA's time table is 2 months which is way too slow for what a basic engine should be able to do).

Just think what a ship could do that can accelerate engine rotational velocities up to the speed of light (electrostatic wave speed: 220,000 miles per second). Twin double vortex construction with a double-pole vertical accelerator (double helix like DNA co-counter rotation) upgrade, and it would be inter-galactic, rather that just interstellar, a true Tachyon drive. As it stands, a caduceus AC spiral of particle flow through the vertical core can be tested using the same basic mechanics of the timing and porting/venting of the vertical engine. 

With all these concepts in physics and engineering truly studied, the LAU-X3 can be seen to be a good design as a test ship and learning platform that can reach other stars. Operating in a different set of mechanics, say that of hyperspace teleportation, the distance the LAU-X3 can travel in one second (that would be a large distance if it takes 15 minutes to traverse that distance) would be its "jump frequency." Since the vertical core compresses space specifically (harnessing a gravity force like a pocket of gravity in front of the ship that the perpetually falls into), then the distance the ship could travel in 15 minutes to the pilots to one second on Earth would be quite a leap. See: "Interstellar Teleportation" at the bottom of the Warp Drive News page. 

There are seemingly different sets of mechanics that just the OTC-X1 operates under as both teleportation and warp drive, as well as true antigravity.


. . .


Time Travel:  If Relative Acceleration or Deceleration as seen on the Home page in the "notes on relativity" section up top allows for faster or slower rates of time, then there are polarities of positive and negative time (relative forward and relative backwards flows). I don't want to confuse things at this point, though. It is known the X-1 engine can create higher frequencies of time "clock-ticks" (see the next posts down), and lower the inertial mass (displacement of inertial frequencies). The outer ring can also change the frequencies of gravitation, and carry the energy frequencies through the hull space (using capacitor plate vanes or vents) to the inner core and return in a circuit. Two different gravitational frequency fields would make a huge difference in resonance (multiplying the frequencies even further).

It would be faster in time, then gravitation, but the frequencies would multiply immensely with a much higher compression of spacetime in front of the ship (and much less behind the ship) then the standard warp drive metrics.


Inertial displacement can also apply to teleporting distances -- in a frequency field as a "range of its temporal frequency" and even "temporal displacement" -- being anywhere possible within a range of a field of distance, anywhere in a one-second radius, for example. 

. . .


An upgrade to the vertical core is possible to handle a counter-rotational spin of accelerated mass (separated by a cylinder wall) which would put the frequency geometry into that of Relative Acceleration. That could provide additional fine-tuning of the engine fields. The new outer segment of the cylinder can be made to counter-rotate (which can easily be handled from a separate motor to rotate the outer segment of the inner vertical core of the ship, if the engine dynamics can't do that alone). 

Plasma/air flow can be directed in a counter-spiral through the outer housing of the vertical core. In fact, the whole cylinder doesn't have to rotate but could handle rotating internal components within the cylinder housing, built around segments of slanted coils that spin in opposite of the vertical core of cones, or at the very least coils between each ring of repulsive magnets. It is the relative motion of the change of magnetic fields which generates electricity, so there can be some electrical generation in the vertical core housing (inside the housing, the cones moves against themselves and can be fitted with coils, as per the diagrams on the Home page).

The inclusion of a Relative Acceleration curve would make a huge difference in the resonance of gravitation.

If a separate motor to spin the assemblies within the housing is required, there is resonance that can be harnessed by the magnetic forces of the spinning cones over sensitive pick-up coils for overunity. More research should be done on co-counter rotating plasma spirals against ring-segments of magnets, otherwise by using vanes (flat metal plates stacked, with an air space between each one, similar to capacitors) that spiral down the cylinder-housing's internal space, the plasma can be electrically guided. 

It can all easily handle AC or DC geometry in these shapes; and non-conductive parts of the vanes can be arranged so that there can be pulsing positive and negative charges down the vanes, timed with engine rotation, guiding the plasma flow electrically (and with acceleration).


. . .


The concept of "resonance" is like magic to some people, who don't understand it. But as long as it can be seen as a real concept, as in the cases illustrated on the Home page up at the top, then the student of Gravitation can play with the thought of it. A concept of gravitational resonance may simplify the physics even further. It can explain the mechanism of wave-function of the accumulation of inertial frequency at the central accumulator. That can be considered an inversion of inertial frequency (change of inertial mass) to "negative space" required in the Alcubierre metrics. It would be interesting to see if the OTC-X1 floated exactly the distance of the radius of the central utron disk, above the ground.

I'm just playing with the thought. A resonance field is going to "unfold the dimensions of the engine geometry," and realize effects in harmony with quantum vacuum space. I think the more classical approach of relative tachyon drive mechanics may still apply, but being able to travel in a resonance with vacuum space may fill the gap left from the sudden jump of mass into light.

Since "resonance space" applies upon ...  space (the vacuum), then it would be somewhat unaffected by gravitational forces not within the starship's space. It would be easiest and fastest to travel in deep space, but flying closer to the sun and inner planets (and flying into another star's gravity field that exceeds a certain inertial mass frequency "gravitytime zone", for that matter) may not be an issue due to the multiple engine systems.

At any rate, I'm confident in the information on this website to date. I hope to see some Outer Ring tests on youtube done by a whole bunch of different people. Might be less scary then duplicating an OTC-X1. It would have to have some kind of capacitor plates and central accumulator mechanism, maybe slapped together in a crude test model. What would the ring do by itself? 

If anything new comes up, I'll be sure to update; but at the very least, I hope this website brings people "up to speed" with this special type of unified physics. 

I want to encourage people to live wholesome lives firstly. Look what we've got ...  here it is. If anything, we have potential. We Create. As long as we can understand the physics, then the engineering is right there.



Resonance also relates to thought and emotion. Whatever frequency you resonate in, is going to be the frequency you experience. Not only can you choose frequencies, but you can create new ones (as long as they are positive of the highest honor to Life -- that qualifying the actions of unconditional love).

UPDATED!!!!   FIGURED IT OUT!!!   See the bottom of this post. Time is faster closer to gravity between fixed points of reference, without motion and speed being involved.  3/28/15



Recently, I've been thinking about higher frequency atmospheric conditions over the surface charge of Earth ground. Particularly where UFO sightings are found to be more common. Some we can see from the ground, some requires a certain frequency field to be able to see UFO's vibrating in a higher frequency in the air.

It doesn't really have anything to do with curved space or gravity, but with frequency conditions.

The Tesla tower showed that higher frequency occurred over the surface of the Earth; the higher over the surface, the higher the frequency.

A starship would have to lower its frequency in order to land on the surface.

What if a starship comes from another place than Earth, for example from a higher-frequency system? How would the ship lower its frequency lower than the place where it was constructed, to land on Earth (Earth would be vibrating at a lower frequency then say, an Ascended planetary "life-sphere")?

It would have to make an electrical ground connection with Earth surface (like a rod stuck in the surface), and reverse its internal transformers and carry that frequency throughout the ship, electrically "grounding out" the ship.

Frequency deals with time and vibration more than gravity does. The frequency increase in the upper atmosphere of Earth and above the atmosphere (resonance of higher frequency atmosphere through the vacuum of space) would affect time, speeding up time farther from gravity, but without having anything at all to do with gravity being the thing that affects time.

Because if gravity were the thing that affected time, the more gravity is at a higher frequency of mass concentration. Space and Time is one fabric. So there are two conditions that affect time: Gravity Frequency (inertial energy) -- indirect, and Electrical Frequency (magneto-electrostatic) -- direct. 



The OTC-X1 engine (and the Outer Ring engine) doesn't necessarily use the principles of gravity at all, because all inertial forces are in balance and equilibrium at all times.

The Vertical engine of the LAU-X3 (central vertical core of cones) however uses both gravity and electrical principles (electro-gravity).


This could very well explain the difference between General and Special Relativity, and Tesla Frequency Relativity, as far as how those situations affect time-measurements and time dilations (different "time zones" of how fast or slow time flows).


Magneto-electrostatic energy alone is not what makes such changes, unless it is in the same geometry of a stellar object such as a planet, star or black hole (double vortex), or as the magneto-electrostatic resonance field of a gravity frequency.

As a result, these physics at this website have inadvertently become a unified hybrid, and in some parts without clearly making the distinctions about what causes what (although there is no causality, a black hole causes the existence of a galaxy; the universe is the result of our existence; the biological fractal causality is in the middle of all known frequency ranges of the universe, shown by Nassim Haramein 
https://vimeo.com/51309681).



That would certainly make it more difficult for mathematicians to calculate precise Relativity, possibly explaining imprecision in certain GPS systems. Also, it explains why Special and General relativity seem to "get things backwards" in instances where we can observe objects visually closer to the sun and planets, in those static frequency fields.



All a higher-frequency starship (and crew) has to do is electrically ground their systems, in the ship and biologically, to match Earth surface frequency. Maybe it would make it harder for them to raise their frequency back up to depart and return to their origin, but I doubt it. Frequency transformation can easily be done. A ship engines alone makes it to where all frequencies can be experienced.



A higher gravity-field electrical resonance in the atmosphere would imply that there is stronger inertial frequency there (not necessarily stronger gravity). Gravitational resonance increases the normal effect of gravity, and that can be seen throughout galactic geometry. The gravitational force at the surface of Earth would become less at higher altitudes, due to the increased frequency resonance of the field at higher altitude, making the gravity weaker by a phasing polarity of gravity, relatively, the higher one is over the surface if we consider gravitational resonance fields. Likewise, there would be neutral gravity at some point directly between the Earth and moon, which cancels the gravity effect of the Earth, and of the moon individually. 

I think that's more of an oddity, though. I'm thinking about deleting that paragraph above, it's rather counter-intuitive. I do want to point something out, though. On the Home page I mention forces of "relative acceleration" and "relative deceleration," particularly dealing with near-Earth orbit and atmospheric travel and motion. Magneto-electrostatic resonance fields can occur in both atmosphere, and in a vacuum (near-Earth orbit, where there is no atmosphere). For example a satellite can generate an electrostatic energy wave from working with ions and gas in an engine, but the electrostatic wave will still propagate through a vacuum as long as it's first generated in air (static). 

If a jet or near-Earth orbiting rocket or satellite travels in the same curved path and speed both around the Earth, and out deeper in space away from the Earth, there will be a measured difference in temporal relativity due to the proximity to Earth because Earth generates a resonance field gravitationally, inertially, and electrically. You could observe the same thing geometrically, as well. 

The moon doesn't appear to actually be traveling that rapidly because it's so far away from the Earth, and that is another aspect of relativity is relative motion (acceleration and/or deceleration) pertaining to orbits. There are many different ways to look at a countless number of finite variables involved, including with resonance. The Earth and the moon are in a type of gravitational resonance with each other but the vibration of one object can also be considered a resonance field, even though it may take two things to establish a resonance; a vibration is resonance of a one. Honestly, I just want to point out the existence of resonance fields at this point, and I'm not intending to explain it or do anything with it. I'm just somewhat loading it into the "up front memory buffer."

That tangent aside:


Time is at a higher frequency when GPS satellites are moving at a higher frequency, adding inertial frequency to the satellite, even though it is relatively in a fixed position over Earth via line-of-sight at all times (it has to move faster to keep up with the rotation over the Earth, and to balance out it's vector of motion to that of the vector of the pull of gravity).

As in the case of objects orbiting the Earth in a close orbit, like the space shuttle or the International Space Station (ISS), they would be in a different resonance like the rubber ball which rubbed against a crystal bowl causes the bowl to vibrate -- different "sounds" to each object. The resonance of its motion quickly across the Earth's sky, in either the forward direction of Earth's rotation or the backward direction, would create a frequency change that is different from a GPS satellite in a fixed position traveling in similar relative motion to the Earth.

Near-orbit objects or vehicles have a higher pull of gravity to overcome, and must travel faster. Their time frequency is a little slower to maintain that separation or distance over Earth because they're moving so fast in space (spatial distance) relative TO the Earth.

Higher-orbit GPS satellites don't have to deal with the close resonance of the static gravity field frequency of Earth, and have a little bit of a faster flow of time, because it's also generating its own resonance frequency.




What is the time zone of the moon? Hmm. It orbits the Earth. Orbiting the central sun, planetary time zones are merely relative according to their mass, and different harmonic distances from the sun, and relative motion with/against each other (coming and going) since all the planets orbit relative with the sun. 

The moon has a slight relative acceleration (moving against Earth's spin), but is not traveling very fast (it travels 1/7th the arc of the sky per day). It has a lot of mass, but not nearly the amount of mass of Earth. It is far enough away from Earth so that it is not in Earth's immediate near-resonance field. It's spin is also very, very slow, enough to make one side somewhat affixed pointing to Earth. I would say Earth clock rate ticks faster, but it's fairly well-balanced.

Jupiter should have a little faster time frequency than the Earth (it's revolving around the sun slower, but it has more mass), but then Venus should have a slower time frequency than the Earth (Venus is closer in resonance to the sun, but is in motion faster, but the clock rate will change depending on when Venus is coming or going). Mercury should have a faster time frequency because it's just so close to the sun HOWEVER, there is a slow time speed-bump near gravitational sources as seen in the post below, "Starship Relativity," which shows Mercury's time zone ought to be slower. Special relativity adjusts the time frequency between the motions of the each planet to each other, as each planet also is in motion around the sun (coming or going relative to another planet, and on what side of the sun and in what gravitational alignments).

Gravity affects space, and frequency affects time (General, and Special inertial relativity).

If time flowed faster outside the solar system (away from gravity), it would have a limited range until the space started to be stretched between gravity fields beyond the normal time flow. On a sheet of rubber, Y is time, X is space. Stretch space and you still have to deal with it taking time to travel an even longer distance. Time also takes longer to cross the distance, and so time is also stretched (lowered in frequency) -- expansion of space due to acceleration and gravity. The stars are none-the-less in the same places and not moving farther or closer or farther. Gravity makes it appear as if distant star systems and galaxies are moving away from everything, but only because it is the pull of gravity that warps the spacetime frequencies. Dark matter has been attributed to keeping this balance, but there is a balance.

The red shifting of distant stars is not because they are moving farther away from us (the stars have been in the same places for thousands of years, look at the pyramids, the Sumerian Hall of Records, too), but it is because the force of gravity is Equivalent to an acceleration force. The distant stars are still in the same location, just red shifted due to gravity's pull, not because they are physically moving apart.

Equivalence means that Gravity is equivalent to acceleration. Gravity has a pull, it doesn't mean the stars are actually accelerating farther away. It's like saying a black hole's gravity is so strong not even light can escape it; meanwhile, light and gravity waves travel at the same speeds. Gravity waves are not somehow magically traveling faster than light waves at the same frequency (actually there is one exception; see "Starship Relativity" post down below). Gravity itself couldn't even be felt beyond the event horizon, and it would close itself off from the universe, and we wouldn't even know about a black hole'e existence. Thus, there is no event horizon, if it is claimed that light speed and gravity waves travel at the same speed. Particle fountains and high energy cosmic rays spew forth from a black hole, luminously.

An Event Horizon depends upon gravity waves traveling faster than the speed of light; and under normal conditions it does not, or does it? Does gravity actually have a wave? Or is "Gravitation" a force of resonance of the combination of waves that is the very shape of space itself?

Also, just because our Sun has been here long enough to receive 13 billion years of light from the universe (distant galaxies and what have you), doesn't mean the universe is 13 billion years old. It means our Sun is 13 billion years old. Paradoxes! It's just common sense! It's called "paradoxical relativity."

I do want to be careful about saying there is no event horizon to a black hole, however. The situation above is an exercise in logic only. However the age of the sun is correct.




I keep coming back to this one thing -- "Unifiable" Relativity -- and it seems to be the most important "reality" to "graph."




If one shot a powerful visible laser to Jupiter from Earth, they would have to aim where they visually see that Jupiter will be in seconds, because the light takes time to travel from Jupiter to Earth. Observers would watch in amazement as the laser took a curved path to Jupiter. The light from Jupiter is where it was, not where it is, just like hearing the sound from a Jet crossing overhead. Special relativity is a necessary inclusion of calculation to launch a probe to another planet.

As the planet Mercury passes around behind the Sun, at some distance across the midpoint behind the Sun, the light from Mercury will be bent around the Sun so it appears as if it comes out from around the Sun faster than when we expect it to be. But it's spin is also increased, and we can't make up the difference unless we factor in the Sun's gravity field and how it speeds up time.

Special relativity is different than General relativity. General relativity deals with the mass of the planet or star or stellar object (even a massive probe), of how its mass affects time and space.

"Tesla relativity" is the direct frequency adjustment of spacetime, directly transforming the frequency of spacetime through an energy field, rather than accelerating forces of inertial mass.




~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.




Take a look at the image below. Modern General Relativity shows that time is slower closer to a gravitational source. But Historical Record from the Sumerian Hall of Records show that time passes faster in the star system than outside the star system. The Nephlim used monoatomic gold to stay young and healthy for the duration that the Elder gods (Anunnaki) were gone. 3600 years (one "Shar" or "day") would pass to one "Anunnaki Day" where they are from, just outside the solar system (that pertains to the orbits, not the time dilation). The same people would return to Earth, but their children, the Nephlim were older because more time passed on Earth, and less time passed in the time zone just outside the Solar system. Ancient record is opposite of what General Relativity states. "Rule by Secrecy" by Jim Marrs also correlates with information out of the Sumerian Hall of Records.

The picture below is a rough representation of the time dilation, in a visual form, according to General Relativity. According to General Relativity, it is indeed possible for a gravity force to be completely neutralized, thus proving that the OTC-X1 does indeed lower inertial mass, where the mass of a space vehicle to go to zero in an energy field. By reducing mass, gravity is neutralized (phased to zero, or to a very low number), which allows for the time frequency of the ship to be much higher. So the pilots would witness time slowing down dramatically all around them, while they were sped up in a faster flow of time in the ship. Gravity (inertial mass) neutralization.

The point of reference is outside the solar system, but General Relativity is measured from Earth as the fixed point of reference usually. That may change the results. If only 10 years pass in time frame (A), and say 100 years passes in time frame (B), then time-frame B is at a faster frequency, and thus spatial distance is shortest.

Expansion of space stretches the space, and thus it takes longer time to travel a distance -- a temporal distance is lengthened in its frequency. Expansion of space violates General Relativity, if we are to consider time speeds up away from a gravitationally high inertial mass frequency (frequency = in time).

Expansion of space actually violates Special Relativity though, not General Relativity. 


The picture below is Special Relativity, not GR. 

The picture above is Special Relativity. And yet it is called and considered General by many scientists, because the spin and rotation of the planets relative to each other, and to the sun in particular has the highest factors involving the changes of time, which are measured as being very, very, very, very slight! (See the Caption)



General Relativity is one of the most confusing things ever, because of the conflicts and violations with other well-known theories. Special Relativity is more commonly used than General Relativity because all bodies are in motion relative with other bodies. But atomic clocks have measured the difference in time dilation at sea level, and on top of a mountain. 

Could those clocks have been misread, or the results falsified? Neutralizing the gravity field would bring time to a zero, frozen; but nothing can reach an absolute zero because all motion stops, and we see UFO's zipping around rapidly in the skies.




According to General Relativity:

Time going to a zero is the result of frequency acceleration, to where the spaces in between each moment get less and less, so that much, much more time actually passes within the field. That doesn't make sense, does it? It would appear that engines accelerating mass electrostatically (220,000 miles per second) accomplishes the electrical energy of mass moving in parallel instead of being electromagnetically accelerated in a transverse wave (at 90 degrees, see: Tesla Engineering Physics page); and also acceleration at light speed increases the gravitational force (Equivalence: gravity and acceleration is the same) thereby bringing time to a stand-still because the more gravity means the slower the time flow. But that makes no sense, because protons can be accelerated at the speed of light in a particle accelerator, generating a huge inertial mass field of a single proton (enough to shake the entire ground for miles), but does NOT slow the proton down to a halt.

Bringing gravity to a zero should speed up time infinitely, to that of light itself -- a photon. At the level of infinity, zero is the same as infinite. Zero time, meaning no time is just the same as meaning all time at once, simultaneously.


We have two zero conditions, one of Special Relativity, and the other of General Relativity. Therefore testing mass accelerated to light speed is the same as testing the flow of time closer to a huge gravitational source like the sun, since acceleration and gravity is EQUIVALENT. The difference is that a proton at light speed has a huge inertial mass and gravitational force, BUT the accelerated proton does not meet the condition of: "The faster it goes, the slower it goes."


A proton in an accelerated frequency of spacetime, and thus having a higher gravity does NOT slow down time in its frequency frame of motion and energy. Electricity moves at light speed. What is electrons but the movement of electron-mass carried along via charge either di-electrically in parallel, or electromagnetically in transverse? An electron however, is much different than a proton. Electrons adjust frequency, protons adjust gravity. Adjusting frequency can adjust gravity, and adjusting gravity (inertial mass) can adjust frequency. How can frequency and gravity be transformed?

As frequency increases, inertial mass (gravity) decreases? But it is those higher frequencies which causes the proton to move faster, increasing its inertial frequency so that it's mass increases and has stronger gravity. They move together! Only in an engine like the OTC-X1 do you see an increase in frequency (time; Y-axis) with a decrease in gravity (space; X-axis), but that is due to simultaneous co-counter-spins of electrical inertial force.


So therefore, General Relativity violates Equivalence, and thus violates Special Relativity conditions.

Houston we have a problem.


The only way to solve this is to assume time speeds up closer to gravity, like the Sumerian Hall of Records also shows. The hyper-accurate starcharts in the ancient records were finally able to be verified by NASA in the 1970's. Could it be that gravitational frequency resonance affects the measurements of the atomic clocks used to test GR, as stated toward the beginning of this post? To be clear, I have no issue with Special Relativity, only with General Relativity where two atomic clocks are BOTH at rest at different elevations on the surface of the planet.

However, notice, at higher altitudes, there is faster speed involved. And so there still has not been any test of General Relativity, but it is still a test of Special Relativity!



Zero time is also infinite time. As shown in the book "The Edge of Infinity" by Paul Davies, the event horizon of a black hole is a perfect zero frozen time; and upon crossing that horizon, ALL of time of the infinite universe passes by at that moment, and one enters a pure system of light -- simultaneous infinity. 

However that is operating under the assumption of General Relativity's claim, meanwhile violating several well-known and observed conditions of the universe. The event horizon means no information can escape and return out into the universe. But, as we have seen from Bob Lazar's experiment with ET gravity engines at the top of the Home page, light still shines because light is independent of time. Furthermore, X-rays and high-frequency energy particle fountains flow from a Black hole, violating the conditions of General Relativity's claim. How can there be ANY high frequency particles when time, at the event horizon is at the lowest frequency possible, zero, meanwhile upon crossing it, time suddenly reverses to infinite time passing all at once?

The event horizon is due to the "tipping" of the light cone to where one edge is straight up and down, whereas X (space) = 0, and time (Y) = infinity. But as one travels into the "gravity well" of a black hole, the pilot will continue to travel and travel and travel, chasing that zero time barrier, and never catching it because it is always just over the event horizon.

To explain a light cone: from a point of origin of turning on a light bulb, light moves through time and space on a rectilinear coordinate graph at a 45 degree angle as the light travels through space, and takes time to travel that space (traveling through space and time). 2-D space curves (like a ball of weight on a flexible rubber sheet, making a dent, or a well because of the ball's weight), and as the Y axis is always perpendicular to the X axis, at a certain point where space is curved at a 45 degree angle, the light from the origin no longer escapes out into space at all. It goes straight up along the Y axis, not traveling any distance in space.


At the point where time is a zero, there should not be any space! The ratio of X/Y is undefined when Y = 0. If there is no space, then time is at a zero, but actually the "edge of infinity" is because light cannot travel anywhere out in space, but it can take all the time in the universe to try. That Y axis, any movement parallel to the Y axis away from the gravity well is infinity. Infinity is common in mathematics. As a curve on a graph always approaches the Y axis infinitely but never touching it, is indeed a common condition of a mathematical limit. So time becomes infinite, and space becomes zero -- NO SPACE AT ALL. That is the condition of light itself, which has no time, or rather, all time happens all at once.


There are two logical possibilities (actually three): The data of the atomic clocks was falsified, or gravitational frequency resonance increases the clock-rate. Out of every two possibilities, there's always a third. All things are in motion. The ONLY place we can test General Relativity is upon the Earth, where everything is in constant motion at the same rate, relative to the planet itself. Measuring at sea level, and measuring on top of Mt. Everest, the frequency of time is slower at sea level but NOT due to the effects of gravity at all, but instead due to the frequency differences of magneto-electrostatic energy fields, and only relative to Earth! If we get far enough away from Earth, the time frequency should start to become slower again because of the dissipation of Earth's static field of electro-inertial energy. Dissipation is the wrong word. Less-concentrated and less-dense are better words.

When we get farther away from the Earth, Special Relativity applies more than General Relativity.





By now it should be seen the differences, and how gravitational time zones actually work, if you have read the Home page, parts of the Warp Drive News page, and the Starship Relativity post below (and maybe the engineering pages) ... enough to give one a good idea of the functioning and relationships of time and space and gravity and frequency.

There's a lot of data to sort through and study, but I believe it's worth it, to get a better idea of how starships operate. 





SOLUTION REVEALED!!!!!



Here's the situation with General Relativity. An atomic clock is at sea level, and an atomic clock is on top of Mt. Everest. The clock goes faster at Mt. Everest. Why?

Simple! If a wheel is spinning on a rod or drive shaft, the speed is slower closer to the center of the circle. Out along the outer edge of the wheel, the speed is faster to keep up. Make sense?

The speed of the rotation of Earth along sea level is at a certain speed, around 2,000 miles per hour if memory serves. But, a GPS satellite affixed over that location in high Earth orbit must travel much faster to keep up with that affixed spot on the ground. It's like if your friend is on a merry-go-round and is spinning around, and he is holding one end of a 20 foot pole, and you are holding the other end, then if you are 20 feet away from that merry-go-round, you'd really have to run super fast to keep up with his motion.

So it is not General Relativity that is being measured with the atomic clocks at Sea level, and at high elevation. It's SPECIAL Relativity!

The best way to test for General Relativity to show time speeds up closer to gravity is to get in a fast jet that can travel faster than 2,000 miles per hour, and fly from East to West (the Earth's rotation spins from West to East) at the same rate that Earth spins. The jet can hold a relative fixed location in altitude as the Earth spins out from under the Jet. The pilots of the Jet would see the sun always sitting in the same place in the sky, but see the Earth moving very rapidly below. Conditions like this HAVE been tested, and they really DO show that time is faster in this condition, but ONLY relative to a stationary spot on the ground, like an airport or another jet parked at an airport, and unfortunately, that stationary spot on the ground is rotating with the Earth.

The only true way to test for General relativity is to have two super-fast jets, one at high altitude, and one at low altitude, traveling at the rate of speeds which makes the two jets always directly in alignment with each other. The pilot in the lower jet can look up and always see the second jet right where it is, and the sun right where it is. Each jet carrying an atomic clock could then compare the rate of time difference, directly as it pertains to gravity alone, and not due to motion alone, as in the case of Special Relativity.

The lower jet should show a faster rate of time than the top jet. Well, actually since the top jet is having to travel a little faster, then it is in a higher frame of acceleration, and thus having a higher frequency of gravity time, and so its clock must run a little faster, actually. So the lower jet should have a slower rate of time, and the upper jet a faster rate of time, due to acceleration within relative gravity conditions of Earth.


But that shows the Equivalence between acceleration and gravity. And also it shows the relationship between frequency and gravitytime. Higher frequencies of gravitytime have faster clock-rates. This means that close to the sun, due to the higher acceleration frame of its gravity alone, the clock should tick faster. 


The jet above has a faster rate of time in relative acceleration with Earth Gravity Field, and it is based upon the Earth Gravity Field, acceleration relative to it. The The clock tick-rates of the jets are relative with Earth's gravitational frequency. 


And so, time speeds up closer to gravity, and slows down farther from gravity, as a rule of thumb involving relative frequencies of gravitytime (which also includes acceleration rates within relative fields of gravitation -- recall "gravitation" from the "Gravitational Resonance" post above). However that also MUST involve relative changes of speed and motion (Special Relativity) as well, since everything is in motion, and it is the frequency of motion and gravity which is the fabric of time and space!

That way, all the physics work like they are supposed to, and General Relativity is not in any violation with any other theories of known physics that can be observed for accuracy and validity. But even better! We can build hyperdrives, warp drives, light drives, and fly to another star, and return home in time for dinner.


Expansion and contraction of space concept in the post "Gravitational Resonance" and in the "Inflation of Space" section at the bottom of the Warp Drive News page certainly predict such a condition of gravitational frequency relativity mathematically (Alcubierre), and engineered as the X-1 engine. The condition that time speeds up closer to a gravitationally massive body generally is an integral component and aspect of interstellar transportation physics.

In the negative energy model, a negative energy warp bubble is the result of accelerating fields of gravitation. It seems the universe is a natural paradox that applies generally in deep space, but paradoxically (specially) in stellar space (in a star's stellar capacitor of gravitation).


It is now a logical possibility that Nibiru (Marduk), the planet mentioned in the Sumerian Hall of Records can really have a time dilation ratio of 1 : 3600 years when two factors are taken into consideration: Distance from the Sun's gravity, and speed of Nibiru's orbit, either in the same direction of Earth or in the different direction of Earth's orbit. For such a huge gap, Nibiru would have to be traveling in an orbit in the opposite direction of Earth's orbit, and be a considerable distance from the Sun at its highest peak of relative time dilation.

To be clear, that ratio 1 : 3600 years actually refers to planetary orbits rather than such an extreme time dilation. In fact, that is how a Shar (the 3600 year difference) was determined, is to be the actual time of Nibiru's orbit (called the "Tablet of Destiny" in the Records). However, the time dilation is unrevealed, but it should be known that there is an extreme time dilation involved. In one case of an ET contact situation, the ET had said a window of 3 days was all that was allowable to spend any time on Earth, due to the time dilation of the distance and speeds (general and special relativity) involved.





So to recap:       Gravity-time is inertial frequency


We can derive these simple laws:

The faster something goes, as a rule of thumb, the faster it's time frequency, because it is in a higher accelerated frame of gravity-time. A jet traveling near Earth has a higher gravitytime frequency than rocket out in deep space traveling at the exact same speed. That is also dependent on if the rocket is traveling in the same direction, or opposite directions; and since the Earth is round and spins, a jet will have a higher acceleration curve then a rocket at the same speed traveling in a straight line.

Any change in inertial mass of an object also proportionately changes a field of gravity of that object.

The higher the inertial mass, the higher the frequency in both space, and time.

Likewise, the higher the gravity field, the higher the frequency in both space, and time.



So out in deep space away from gravity fields, time is slower and distance is longer and frequency is lower (see the comment on this post).



How this applies:


Traveling at the speed of light (roughly) incurs a tremendously higher gravitytime frequency (more inertial mass). This then appears that Earth time is much slower, just barely creeping along. The ship can fly to Alpha star and back, without much time actually passing on Earth, both according to the pilots, and to the people on Earth.

A ship that uses a hyperdrive can fly to a distant star much faster, not taking much time at all to actually arrive there. The ship can fly to Alpha and return to Earth, and not much time on Earth has passed.


On the condition that the hyperdrive actually lowers the gravity and inertial mass of the ship, yet increases the frequency of time due to the co-counter rotating electrical inertia (electrogravity) of a ship engine, then the ship can travel faster than light, particularly when a propulsive gravity force is used that increases as mass decreases (tacyhon).

Since the frequency of time is increasing purposefully, then not only can the ship travel to Alpha Centauri very rapidly, measured in times of seconds, minutes, and days rather than years, but the ship will also be able to return to Earth without much time having passed on Earth at all. 

The engine and energy geometry of the starship engines can be re-vitalizing to a pilot's health as seen in some experiments using electromagnetic Rodin votex (interference wound) coils, and perhaps even incur a biological regeneration ability beyond what the Human can do alone.




As stated on the home page, an increase of resonance also increases the frequency. Such an increase of resonance upon the field of matter itself, using magneto-electrostatic co-counter-rotating inertia, increases the frequency of the matter-field of the vibrating space of the energy field of the ship's fractal atomic structure (matter-energy space).

An increase of frequency of energy resonance, while phasing out the inertial forces of acceleration, also lowers the energy phase of mass and gravitation, while increasing a frequency of matter-space.

The frequency of time itself is increased because the spaces between each moment of inertia are reduced in co-counter acceleration (Acceleration = Gravitation).

A monopole of charged magneto-static inertial force (which includes the mass-wave of that force as particles of mass-force), creating a gravity-time well in the center of the vortex on one side only also increases the resonance of frequency at the central accumulator and throughout the rotational systems. 




The relation of the mass-gravitation wave going to zero while time approaches infinity is a similar mechanism to a transformation between electrostatic and electromagnetic waves, as electromagnetic waves are un-polarized (phased to zero in co-counter spin) in pure electrostatic fields.

It does not imply that time and space (time and mass, or frequency and gravitation) is inverse in relationship to each other. It implies that each can be transformed just as electrical force and magnetic force can each be isolated in energy-form.  







See: "Keep In Mind (Tacyon Drive Mechanics)" at the bottom of the Tesla Engineering Physics page.

Updated    3/30/15



I've altered the content a bit of this post. There is additional rambling below this immediate addition, but it has become known that General and Special relativity is not in conflict with one another, and the unity is seen in starship relativity. The above is a spacetime relativity diagram. The below helps one to interpret what's going on there. Keep in mind, the universe is 12 dimensional (most pleasing shape: 3 + 4 = 7 ...  3 x 4 = 12 ... 7 x 2 = 12 which is due to a 12-pointed geometry around a wheel; one half the circumference will have 7 points  ..... ... and 7 + 2 = 9 as the Densities of Consciousness); and the image above (the Relativity Diagram at the top) is only TWO dimensional ...




Speed, moving fast and faster clock ticks, is equivalent to gravitational force, which is equivalent to a force of mass, at rest..  but can mass really truly be at rest? To simply things, it's easy to reference the object-location of a sphere of mass like a planet as to how much spacetime it is warping. ....  Tesla never believed in curved space.

The relativists would say that time slows down because a massive body dents the curve of space. As space (x-axis) curves down, then the right angle of time as the Y axis also must stay right angles to the surface of that curve. So away from that gravity pocket, we look across a flat plane, and it starts to take longer in time to look, because the Y axis of time is now lengthened. That's Euclidean geometry only, however. A mere 2 dimensions.

Granted, theoretically, if in 2 dimensions then it can be expanded infinitely into any dimensions. A^2 + B^2 +C^2 +D^2 +E^2 ... =  Z^2 .... etc ad infinum .....

But, Tesla argued differently. Only from a flat plane of rotation can the gravity of something seen to be more at rest. The more you start to orbit the spacetime dent of the planet, you make ripples in the lake yourself! The two theories work together because a faster frequency of gravitation (gravity-time) can relatively slow that time down.

Yet, there is no contradiction between general and special relativity.

That applies to being in the center of an Outer Ring drive that time would slow way down. On the other hand, time would be slow around the outside of the Outer Ring drive. How's that for weird. It's actually in reverse. Time slows down INSIDE THE GRAVITY FIELD, allowing for more time to pass, because it's going slower.

Slow time is due to longer waves; however, it's due to the shorter waves of time in frequency acceleration that makes for more time to happen (to flow; to pass; to exist) in the gravity field!

There's no contradiction! It's just a different point of view! It adds up to the same thing!

Sure enough!


It's a matter of perspective. If on the outside of the field, we can see that space is indeed curved, and so the Y-axis of time is faster and brought to a cone shape inside the spacetime dent. That means, that if the direction of the flow of time is up the Y axis, then a whole lot more time passes, and even comes to a point of where all time converges, much closer in the future (instead of infinite time passing straight up the Y). We never see the point where the cone tip touches and converges, but can look into the future to where it does. As we are traveling up the Y axis, it's always that curve that remains the same from one moment to the next, we never actually move faster in time on the outside of the gravity warp then the observer's current rate of "time flow" at rest and not close enough to have to orbit the planet.

Also, light from an event from the inverted cone intersection of time with space traveling at a 45 degrees actually is almost traveling in the same axis as space, nearly parallel to the x axis (parallel to the X axis of space, light travels in space without taking any time). Light from an event some distance away in curved space arrives arrives many times faster to the worldline of Y Prime, in time.

A light event from worldline Y Prime (a light bulb turns on and travels in space taking time to reach a distance), with an angle of 45 degrees from the origin of Y Prime arrives at one of the "legs" of the inverted cone at nearly the same time it left, not traveling very far in time, but traveling much farther in space. The inverted cone in the diagram is of course the Y axis of space, as space is curved.

That definitely shows that time is faster inside the gravity warp, and shows that it is cone-shaped along-with a curved parabola. 

It just takes longer in time to see into where the faster time rate occurs, observing from in deep space to the far left.

I'll be darned! Special Relativity and General Relativity both say the same thing then, that time really does speed up closer to gravity, it just slows down momentarily directly prior to a faster rate of time frequency "flow". 

This certainly has applicability for a starship engine, such as an Outer Ring drive like what NASA is trying to build.


Also it helps explain the nature of the event horizon of a black hole, as far as it receeding the closer you approach the black hole. I love black holes because they are rich paradoxical environments to play with! 

I want to re-emphasize that there are two ways to look at the same thing, depending upon the paradox of perspective (paradox of measurement). It further shows in the example of time both slowing down AND speeding up, that there is no wrong or right, but the truth depends upon your point of view. 

In the case of the event horizon, where light is always at a 45 degree angle to time and space, when space is curved so that the Y axis of time is at 45 degrees, then as a light event travels in time away from the gravity well, is no longer at 45 degrees, but is at 90 degrees, parallel with the Y axis of time, never crossing the axis of Y, and so the light never reaches any distance in space. Light never escapes! However if you travel into the gravity field a little ways and wait, you'll eventually see the light from the event horizon. However, according to Special Relativity, you could never see it unless you were able to warp time on your own. 

In fact,  

This is also however, explaining why we do in fact feel the pull of gravity from a black hole, and can actually be claimed, due to the curvature of space, that the gravity wave travels faster than light, in this scenario.

"The Ongoing Paradox invariably depends upon your point of view." -- Barbara Marciniak

Relativistically, The gravity event at the axis of Y Prime disappears from time (and space) in the not-too-distant future, according to the chart. That is when the ship vibrates high enough in frequency to disappear. As it so happens, that is a similar relativistic chart of a starship, as it is a black hole. However the black hole curvature tapers off to infinity, and is not a shallow bottom as is the chart above. Since a black hole's well goes to infinity, the event horizon of a black hole always recedes farther and farther from view as one enters the gravity well. This chart above therefore has to specifically apply to a starship that can travel a tad faster than light.

It also shows the existence of a negative warp bubble, and the contraction of space and the convergence of time in that sense. Where time goes to zero is the photon, and according to tachyon drive mechanics, that is what is required to jump from one point to another point in space, no matter of any distance. Any change of time also changes space; and any change of space also changes time.

In fact, you can see where the distance in curved space is jumped from one intersection of one leg of the inverted cone, to the other side, in one single moment in time. At a certain frequency of time, a distance of space can be traveled in a one-second, or simultaneous jump. Actually, a simultaneous jump is when the 45 angle of light is in parallel to the common and standard (non-curved) X-axis, so that it does not travel in time. 


However, if light speed itself is really measuring the frequency of time, then the axis of time is itself, the axis of light, and therefore must be at 45 degrees. And then POW!  ...  A BRAND NEW FORM of unified physics is born!


There are limitations to strict relativity. This chart does not represent an absolute, because it is a very limited 2 dimensional view of generally speaking, a 12 dimensional universe. It serves as a handy map, however. When dealing with frequencies, light, time, and space, whereas light measures the frequency of time, then the physics apply in the way I like to apply them, but it tends to come into conflict with Relativity a bit, and so I've had to blend these two physics the way it has been done at this website! I don't know if the blending is hyper-accurate, or how rough the blending is, but ... it really matches up and fits very well, while also allowing for more room for growth (and with not so much of a need to tear it down and rebuild it)!

I'm surprised at how well Special and General Relativity in particular really confirms the possibilities of teleportation and jump drives.


In the case of frequency relativity, space will be like a wave, with crests and troughs parallel with the X Axis, and not below the X-axis. The distance is still shrunk in space because space has to take all those bends, instead of just taking a straight line, and so it pulls space together, compressing it, and rippling it rather than denting it. 

Yet, it's the frequency of time which contracts space; rather it's not space doing the contracting but time itself. It makes for the distance between deep space and event Y Prime a quick hop, instead of a long journey. 

If you treat space as a line, and then just increase the frequencies of time, space is still a line, just a much shorter one! You can kind of see that through the worldline height of Y Prime in time. If an Event right in-line with the X axis in the time-line of Y Prime, so where the common X-axis could intersect, then the distance would still be shorter, by increasing the frequencies of time to make the origin of Y Prime up higher on the worldline height of the axis of Y-Prime.

This is also what is represented by the legs of the inverted light cone; at the frequency height along the Y Prime axis of that (second) Event, in negative time (accelerating in time to a future event)..  it is negative time from that second Event point, pulling the ship up to it. However the point of view, at the accelerated time frequency, the ship would then be at the height of the Event of the intercept of the inverted cone (the future convergence point). Then, as light is simultaneous as the 45 degree axis of time, then a simultaneous jump in space can be achieved when the frequency of the ship is vibrating at light speed.

AND, obviously the shortest distance is a straight line. As the frequencies of the ship vibration increase, it also warps space (making that bowl-shape in the image), and will pull the intercept of the future convergence closer to the Origin of Y-Prime (the Event of the starship in space).


This means that a frequency of time can be generated that resonates the ship at light speed and can make simultaneous teleportation jumps at the distance of its gravitational warp, at very rapid intervals. Obviously at the frequency of the vertical core vibrations, every 360 degree rotation (a complete wave-form), there will be a frequency-hop through space.


Again, that is why Relativity makes things kind of difficult, because there are so many different ways to look at the universe in 12 dimensions, from only a 2 dimensional image. That's why a blending of physics is important, with a lean toward the Tesla side, because, well, Einstein never did make any engines. There are many more aspects to all of this, but I feel on a whole, all the info at this website is pretty dang close, and certainly close enough to show the truth -- that we can fly to other stars and build starships to do it, and to make the journey swiftly.

Frequency (Tesla) and Geometry (Tesla and Einstein) in a blending of vibration and energy physics

. . .


And here's the best part! :

The X-1 disk is the axis of the changes of time, the Y. The vertical core is the axis of space, the X. Gravity is felt naturally as one walks around or sits in the ship. That's somewhat metaphorical. The X-1 disk is somewhat of a gravity plate, where gravity frequency is held in gravitation, standing over the disk. There are multiple paradoxes involved. Another paradox is the case of the missing OTC-X1 test ships, and Tesla's missing little test ships as they disappear, they are still there through time, but in a pocket in a parallel space. Ghosts or spirits may be able to find it easier than we could. If a signal was sent to shut the engines down somehow, we could locate the missing devices in Tesla's lab (occupying a parallel space of where the lab once was before burned down), and even in Otis's lab.

That bizarre tangent aside though, you can look at the picture above to discern a wide variety of situations.

Internal gravity is discussed in a few posts below, but for now to finish the metaphor, it can already be seen in the gravity well conditions above, that a gravity field can be held in frequency conditions, like a force-field that holds a phantom gravity field. My point is also to note the conditions of gravitation flipped on the other axis (the equator is the polar spinning axis). These are somewhat more wild avenues of thought.

The vertical core has a sheer force, and the cockpit is shielded. The Outer Ring has an internal warping frequency, but is far enough from the interior so that the cockpit is a balanced condition of frequency and force (gravitational fields). 

The historic OTC-X1 design puts the cockpit space in the inside, not directly over the rotating capacitor plates and just along the edge of the Central Accumulator. The LAU-X3 cockpit space is above the rotating X-1 disk capacitor plates, but can be inside the field of the Outer Ring, or directly above the inside field of the Outer Ring (meaning the ship would have two decks, and be much larger). 

The X-1 disk would have to extend all the way out to the Outer Ring in that condition, (so the cockpit space won't be directly over the capacitor plates). That might be the only problem, but as long as there is no direct co-counter rotation below the cockpit space, it shouldn't necessarily induce a stronger gravity field than Earth G's. Plus the crew is also isolated in an inertial bubble from the vertical core and Outer Ring drive -- the plasma motion in between the inner and outer hulls (along the inner hull space). 

The co-counter rotation applies more to electromagnetic fields, because particles of mass in accelerated motion need only be going in one way only (one direction) to achieve gravitation. 

Co-counter rotating electromagnetic and static fields however is the alternative to direct mass acceleration of particles, as a means to achieve gravitation.

So it would seem there are two differences between the LAU-X3 and the OTC-X1 as far as safe pilot places. And it now raises the question of how a gravity field can work in a surrounding "force field" of gravitation, where the pilots have to make the journey inside the ship. These are difficult questions to answer. More about that is discussed in the posts below. 


I want to stay focused on the existence of the ship for now, and the understanding of the physics required to build it. As stated, the X-1 engines create a temporal frequency displacement of increased time around the edges, and increased gravitation toward the center, the Outer Ring does the same thing, but also includes the co-counter rotation of mass-charge as accelerated plasma. The rate of frequency acceleration is similar, but a much more powerful force in the Outer Ring due to the plasma.

That central zone of cockpit space inside the Outer Ring plane is also somewhat of a field of an accelerated space, lessening the "impact" of the X-1 gravitational forces, AND allowing for there to be a way for artificial gravity to be generated not by a frequency difference above the capacitors, but by a movement of inertial displacement toward the center. Not all of these are sheerable forces, but also transverse and parallel forces.

The one interesting thing about electrostatic energy is the parallel force it has in the manner not transversely!

That is to say the vertical core creates a downward flow of gravity from top down, at the same force around the vertical core, but the parallel pull of downward gravity is lessened the further away from the vertical core. Parallel Gravity is that concept in a similar way of staking down four posts (perhaps on some little asteroid with hardly any gravity) in a square that creates the same gravity pull down, all throughout the square, say of a comfortable force of Earth gravity.

Relative deceleration forces can apply between the lower X-1 and bottom plasma flow toward the outer ring also in parallel to balance out the forces of gravity.

That's not implying that if you don't turn the right dial at the right speed as another dial that it's going to crush the pilots into goo on the ceiling or floor within a super strong gravity field! That's not implying that at all!  

Besides, these fields may affect organic matter differently. Maybe the pilots would have to wear special organic flight suits, or something, or maybe "flying commando style."

That's really the only unknown about all of this. I would not worry though, about the ship being crushed in its own gravitation. 



The pilot cockpit space is actually a null-gravity zone the way the engines are designed to focus on the center and the outer edge. Also there is a inner inertial displacement in the central accumulator along with an inner-to-outer force of expansion due to the outward plasma flow from the bottom of the vertical core, only to be made back into an inner accumulation again as the plasma returns from the outer edge to the inner core (at the top of the ship). So those particular polarities reverse once, and it might very well be a more neutralizing effect for safe pilot conditions.

This strange condition diverts inertial force back out to the outer edge of the X-1 (through the plasma flow out the bottom of the vertical core, and over the top of the X-1 outer co-rotating shell), giving a further range of acceleration back out to the edge, only to raise the resonance of the edge itself, so the whole system resembles two toroids stacked on top of each other, the upper toroid field shape flowing top down, inside, then back outside again, and the lower toroid field shape flowing inversely, but again outside through the inside plane to the central accumulator which is over-charged with inertial frequency from the vertical core.

The overall double-toroid shape can inscribe the two tetrahedrons moved through each other as Nassim Haramein describes in his "Black Whole" video.

These are complex field dynamics that do more to complicate the issue of if there is internal gravity or not for the pilots. An independent gravitation field would suggest no onboard gravity at all for the pilots, but it can also suggest that the gravity field of when the engines are turned on is somehow held in stasis. Ralph Ring felt gravity and could walk around in the OTC-X1. Independent gravitation is an easy answer though, to a complex issue of if the ship will pull acceleration g-forces taking fast 90 degree turns. The answer is of course not, the pilots won't be squished like that because the pilots are in an independent gravity field. The only question though, is in an independent field, why does it not neutralize the gravity for the pilots instantly when the engines are turned on and the ship levitates? 

Obviously the ship levitates, it doesn't continue to fly upwards. It hovers over the ground. We can assume that flying in an independent field, at that point, the ship can go anywhere, even though separate electrogravity charged flight surfaces can be used separately. So there must be some interaction with gravity and charge and frequency and resonance. Resonance is the highest dimension of thought, in that the concepts of resonance are more innately known to the mind (like probabilities) than angular vectors and velocities and all that mechanical stuff which only creates the resonance field. The resonance field itself is what we want to know about.

When the resonance field-action is understood as "what the fields do," then the identity of "what they are and how they work" are the next logical progressions. It's just a matter of narrowing down the possibilities, and putting them into perspective. ... There are a lot of possibilities as far as that goes. How do the INTERNAL fields apply internally to the ship? Would it be a hurricane of swirling gravity, or would it be the calm in the Eye of the hurricane? 


The X-1 uses the frequencies of time more-so than the particle flow using the energies of space. See, this is what I'm talking about "Philadelphia Experiment." As long as the vertical core engine is not engaging a plasma force, and the Outer Ring drive is in operation, then the forces from the X1 horizontal disk are in effect, to whatever that effect is, in the pilot cockpit area, and the Outer Ring amplifies the frequency field and must at least use some of the vertical core to conduct that charge to the Central Accumulator. Normal gravity should be felt where ever the ship can go, because there is no reason to assume that zero gravity would occur in the cockpit in an independent gravity field warp bubble, based on pilot testimony.

When the vertical core is engaged, and the plasma forces flow, a new bubble would form around the cockpit, but it would be balanced inertially through the vortex structure. Again, there is no clear indication of ANY change of on-board gravity in the cockpit area to assume that the pilots would even feel any gravity forces at all. But perhaps it is that distinction alone -- that no distinction can be made other than pilot testimony.

And so on that note, it's logical to assume there will be a nice comfortable on-board gravity environment for the pilots in organic flight suits anywhere and at any time the ship is in operation, and is in fact, a very protective environment from any hazardous conditions in space (including heavy gravity conditions), so as long as the engines are running as a protective shield around the pilots.

Perhaps it is because the utron tips are pointed up into a 45 degree angle, converging at one point, that can explain the left-over unknown aspects of gravitational resonance, further adding to the dimensions of action of angular inertia. 

... And also keep in mind that changing the frequencies of either time, OR space, will alter the frequencies of the other. As space compresses, so does time. If the frequencies of time get shorter, distance is also shortened. 


. . .


So as a general re-cap to that top portion . . . 

. . . a relativity chart in 2 dimensions can be looked at in a few different ways. One of the reasons I held off on the complex relativity was, aside for the obvious reasons, I'd have to come up with a different way to show things when taking into account that light itself measures the frequency of time, and otherwise light is itself simultaneous! It was NEVER clear to me how relativity came up with the idea of light being the 45 degree angle between time and space other than it was just an assumption that light measured time and space in that fashion. 

I learned in college long ago that according to the actual experience of the photon, if a laser was shined from here to Mars, according to the photon, it would arrive the very moment it left without taking any time, but we see it taking time because we have mass. That gets into the photon taking both paths around the star, etc.

And that really makes a LOT of sense in relativity. It is essentially the very reason we have warp drive physics and theory at all. I never understood how a tachyon could even exist, until I put it into perspective with frequency, light, and mass, as seen in a hyperdrive engine. Then I understood it. Teleportation is possible because light has those simultaneous characteristics. So what does this say about Relativity?

Frequencies can determine the wave and time characteristics of Relativity, and even explain Inflation and the inner dynamics of a gravity warp, where each of these different aspects of physics each expresses different dimensions of the universe. When these different principles of physics are brought together in unity, then certain aspects of physics overlap, and can even appear as a mirror image; and the geometry of the quantum vacuum starts to be seen more deeply clearly as it applies to the physical universe. 

Time is the frequency of space, taken into account gravitation, charge, mass, etc. That's why light measures the frequency of space, and is not at a 45 degree angle between time and space, otherwise light would be a separate aspect of frequency alone and would be part of the universe, rather than the unity of mass in the universe. Light does not depend upon time, otherwise there would not be teleportation, and twin particles wouldn't be simultaneous in their actions.

That's also why time and gravity can't be considered "particles." A gluon is considered a particle when it is merely a gravitational force of attraction overcoming an electric static charge of repulsion.



There is finally, one last way to look at that relativity graph. It looks that space itself is expanded around a gravitational source, being that space becomes the hypotenuse of light and time. Then we would have to say it is not light that is red-shifting, but it is space itself! -- Accelerating Within. As a star moves away from everything else, the time frequency stretches, although the star never really goes away from everything, just the same as to say everything looks like it is moving away from everything, but everything tends to stay where it is, perpetually moving away in the same place it was, and where it will be. That's the pull of gravity.

So it can be seen relatively, that space is not expanding. Gravity sources are expanding within themselves! 

We have complicated math to draw simple conclusions like this; yet the math seems to solve the conflicts of "which is right, and which is wrong" -- true or false. But it fails to make the distinction on if it is real or illusion. An illusion can be true, at least until another illusion comes along that is equally as true. What is real, and what is true, is relative, and paradoxical.



Now it can be seen that time slows down at gravity forces, and accelerates within. That slower time flows as a faster slow-time, the more it approaches the gravitational origin. That is a paradox. That is the mechanism upon the quantum vacuum itself. As a gravity source sucks itself in more and more, where the gravity is strongest closest to the source, it pulls harder! That stretches time even more. 

As long as we can look at the universe in a particular way that makes sense on all levels, including the negative space of The Interior-Universe, then a true unified perception of the logic of paradoxical unification (geometries of light) can exist.


. ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ .


These are the original ramblings below, pending an edit in the future:


. . .


When an object travels at a fast speed, Special relativity can apply. But a starship is always in a field of acceleration, and not merely just a rock hurdling through space at the constant velocity.

A starship is very different. It travels in a faster gravitytime frequency, and its time frequency is also accelerated. I don't think it is Relativity that defines the starship's movements, because a starship behaves differently and uniquely.

Satellites are in their own fields of acceleration relative with the Earth. GPS satellites which hold a fixed position relative with Earth is in a different relative frame of gravity (acceleration -- due to the circular/curved orbit instead of a linear trajectory) and time than satellites or near-orbit spacecraft like the space shuttle or ISS (International Space Station) that move in a closer orbit.

I almost regret going heavy into concepts of Relativity as it pertains to the information on this website, because it does more to confuse the issues I want to show, which is only dealing with one thing, and one thing only: how to keep the time while moving between stars, IN A STARSHIP.

To those ends, it's rather simple. 

And the OTC-X1 makes things even simpler because of the inertial phasing of inertia, and expansion into a wide range of possible location. 

What doesn't make sense is the notion that the faster one travels (with a limit upon the speed of light), the slower one actually goes (speed is a factor of time and distance).

Simply put, mass increases as the massive object approaches the speed of light. That's the most important thing, a way to increase mass (thus gravity). The X-1 takes those accelerated massive frames and has something huge to work with, but phases out a large force of gravity to act independently through space and time.

General and Special relativity though, doesn't really deal with frequencies. That makes it less compatible with Tesla physics and engineering (dealing with frequency and vibration), which would seem to easily violate relativity, and make relativity become paradoxical. General and Special relativity deals with geometry more than frequency.

Tesla physics is common sense, though. But it is increasingly difficult for the mind of a well-trained Relativistic scientist to grasp these notions of gravity as frequency fields of time and space, which is mass energy of inertial fields, which is also fields of acceleration (inertial mass; gravity).

The notion that if time speeds up, distance is shortened is paradoxical geometry, however, dealing with frequencies. An accelerated frame of time and space means that time and space are both at a higher frequency, and likewise at a higher gravity.

That's why I keep coming back to the notion that time is accelerated closer to gravity. An object that is not in a frame of acceleration is moving in a straight line, but any curved path an object takes is at a rate of acceleration, mathematically. Gravity is acceleration. If a car takes a sharp turn to the right, and there is a helium balloon inside the car, the balloon will travel to the right side of a car, toward the curve, going against the G-force that throws the driver to the left.

I tossed out doing the math on Relativistic equations long ago because I kept running into conflicts and negations, and nothing that was rock solid that could be applied as a law of physics that worked every single time without fail. Even GPS satellites are very imprecise, and I feel it's not because the math is wrong, but that our understanding of the universe is incomplete. 

By now though, more people are accepting the principle of Equivalence (acceleration = gravity), which is a load off my mind.

An object in acceleration cannot exceed the wave-propagation of its own energy. Light speed is the speed of wave-propagation in a vacuum. Electromagnetic waves at transverse are at the speed of 186,000 miles per second, and electrostatic waves in parallel are at 220,000 miles per second. These speeds WILL change throughout the universe, in different gravity-time fields, though. These speeds are the speed of the mass of our solar system, the speed of Earth gravity as Earth travels around the sun. An object cannot travel faster than it's mass-wave can propagate, explaining why a massive object (no matter how big or small) cannot exceed the "speed of light."

It's common sense.

Starships can move faster than light because of many factors: gravity/mass wave resonance, spacetime resonance, gravity neutralization (like the electromagnetic wave is not present in a pure electrostatic energy because the EM wave is co-counter spinning, phased to zero; any electromagnetic wave has a spin in one direction, not both at once). Gravity neutralization is a similar phasing-to-zero of the inertial-mass wave generated by the ship, making it become like a big photon.

It's common sense!

It's not even difficult, so why do people keep getting confused, it's so simple!

A faster rate of acceleration of spacetime is a heavier gravity! That's very simple. That means that time is faster, mass is greater, gravity is stronger.

Time deals with frequency, so as the frequencies of acceleration become more accelerated, it is not logical to assume that frequency (time) slows down, when it is speeding up!

In a faster frequency of spacetime, time is faster, gravity is stronger, mass is greater. How can we measure it? Easy! With something else that can be used as a constant. Light isn't even a constant, neither are electromagnetic and electrostatic wave propagation speeds, because it all deals with frequencies. The frequency of our solar system mass/gravity/time is different than other star systems which can be higher or lower.

Actually light is a constant, but not measurable in our universe. Only things in the universe can be measured with other things in the universe. Something without any space and time cannot be measured in a universe of space and time, and make any sense at all.

We'd have to get into metaphysics to deal with that measurement, and philosophy. 

Actually, Light as unity IS the universe, but the universe of space and time is a paradox. A paradox of what? All paradoxes unify. A paradox of light! That's WHY light measures space and time most excellently, because it is common to all matter in the universe, even though light exists without space or time.

A concept of travel to another star cannot even be grasped if we are treating starships like rocks or other inert objects. A starship is highly sophisticated! General and Special relativity cannot really be applied very effectively at all with starship physics. Tesla physics, dealing with frequencies, energy, vibration, now THAT applies.

I'm very sorry to disappoint so many Relativistic scientists on that note, but I just cannot accommodate you very efficiently. I keep going back to the same basic thing: gravity-time is a frequency of inertial fields of mass, like star systems and galaxies. Because of that, Tesla physics don't break apart gravity and time and space like Relativity does. Tesla physics treats space, time, and gravity as a unified field!

Because of that, Starship physics is radically different than General and Special relativity. Try as I may, I can't cram relative physics in with starship physics and have it make ANY sense whatsoever, and those difficulties are clearly seen on this website from where I DID try to accommodate Relativists in an effort to prove this technology works, and so we can start building it.

And in an attempt to over-simply these physics, I may have implied something moving very fast incurs a time dilation, but that should be cleared up right here and now, the difference between linear travel, and travel in a curved path. E = mc^2 is the relation of energy to acceleration. Something falling from a tall sky-scraper building will be accelerating and building up velocity, and all objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum. Earth gravity is what ..  off the top of my head around 9.8 meters per second squared? 

Anything moving at a constant speed, but traveling in a circle also fits with the standard equation f = ma^2 (force = mass x acceleration) squared. E = mc^2 is in the same standard form relating gravity with acceleration and inertial energy (inertial mass). 

I expect people to grasp THAT. But I don't expect people to necessarily be schooled in calculus. I love calculus, but I haven't practiced it in a while because I've mainly been dealing with geometry like E = mc^2, and other simple equations that are more Sacred Geometry than anything else. Sacred Geometry really is the shape of the universe itself. When we know that shape, then we can travel to other stars very easily, and that's ALSO the point of this website, is to show how easy it all can be!

There are only a few things to really know as Laws of physics concerning starships. But honestly the time calculations of Relativity throws infinite hurdles into any attempt to build starships, because one will not build a starship if one does not believe it can be done.



Furthermore, the GPS satellites are supposed to compensate for Relativity, but are inaccurate in some cases as much as 50 feet. If we need to know how much time dilation a starship incurs, then it should be tested and an equation fitted with those measurements of testing it first. If there were a way to calibrate GPS satellite clocks, instead of tuning them before launching, then we could get ultra precise, by making measurements and adjustments on the fly. 

Engines are going to be different in their outputs, their RPM's, and in other ways, which means that no two engine is going to be totally the same in how it affects time. Engineering should be what determines these time dilation calculations, NOT physics.


I cannot make it any simpler without really screwing it up.



A gravity lens though, I do want to discuss a bit, here.

Why does it bend light to magnify distant galaxies like a telescope optic; and why does a gravity lens bend light around a star so that we see a planet behind the sun which SHOULD be obscured from view, actually appearing off to one side of the star?

It is because of the gravity frequency. Time and space behaves as an optic lens, but there's much more going on than that. When we deal with gravity-time frequencies, we're dealing with paradoxes. Time is a huge paradox. Time is what separates matter into matter-paradoxes, otherwise everything would all be unified light.

Space and Time is one field. If space is shortened, it takes less time. If time is shortened, the distance is less. Ultra simple.

Gravity may not actually bend space and time after all. Gravity may actually be spacetime FREQUENCIES.

In fact, that's what Tesla knew. Tesla didn't believe in curved space theory.

As the frequency of time increases, to conceptualize time as a wave, then there are less spaces between each moment. Acceleration of frequency brings mass closer to light, not farther apart.

It's painfully obvious to me that a curved space screws up everything. The Human mind considers space curved because the Human mind is typically only thinking in 2 dimensions of Euclidean geometry (look it up if you don't know what Euclidean geometry is). All of our math is calculating gravity and space and time in 2 dimensions. I'm SORRY, but that is truly crippling for a true comprehension.

Simply put, if you want to see a distant galaxy closer and don't have appropriate magnification of a telescope, put a massively huge star in between you and the distant galaxy, so that star can warp the distance and literally pull space closer, so the distant galaxy can be seen more up-close. That is a simple warp drive -- a Gravity lens. Simply put, the space corridor between star (A) and star (B) is lengthened due to gravitational pull of the stars. The space on the back side of the farthest star (while in orbit around the closest star) is contracted due to gravity's pull (space has a higher frequency over the same distance, making it take less time to travel the gap). Universal/Gravitational Mechanics rather than "special dynamics."

People don't believe the simple. But, people also make simple things way too over-complicated. Performing calculus on flat space which belongs in a realm of Algebra is making things too overly complicated.



I'm very sorry that this website is far too over-abundant with way too much information, but I really have to throw in the complex things so people can start to learn on their own and take notes, and put things together in their minds, and sort out the truth, because if it's too simple, it won't be believed.

I'm going to leave what I wrote about Relativity up on the home page, and on the Warp Drive News page, not to confuse people, but so that people can see the true depth of everything involved. I've seen people come up with crystal clear understandings of the universe, only to totally discard that when something new crosses their mind that puts them in conflict. And then, they forget all about that crystal clarity they had, not even remembering when and what they were crystal clear about.

I hashed it out a bit on the Construction Blog page, but that page has other purposes, including to show the difference about how frequency physics applies, and how Relative physics apply. 

If you can see the difference, then perhaps you can understand. But keep in mind that the overly-complex parts just describes how over-complex things can get. But the goal is to not over-complicate anything, but see the truth as simply as it actually is. I think this website will also help people teach themselves how to study. 

A warp drive cannot even be considered real, unless one can understand Gravity Lensing.

Look at the warp drive philosophy page at all those spaceships, and follow the link to see all those hundreds of color photos, and just look up in the night sky every now and then and watch those objects flying around. Observe how they fly. Some fly around the Earth again and again and again and again. You can watch them moving across the whole sky, wait a moment, and then here they come again, wait a moment, and here they come again.

If I may be so bold, this is what *I* would do: I'd build the ship and then test it. Fly it around the solar system. Test it. Measure it. Until we can do that, there will be endless bickering about if something is true or false, or even real. It's not too expensive to build unless you want to use exotic materials. 

This entire website shows that if we build the ship, it COULD work! There is more then enough information and verification to show that it is not just some random idea.

If we can't build these ships to test them and have a little fun with them, then why can't we; THAT should be the only question, not "oh, it violates special relativity and shouldn't be funded." 

I'm not going to push that philosophical issue of "why" because that would be another website just as vast as this one. There are many other people's websites that are full of those reasons why and why not. There may very well be huge reasons why.




To Recap:


General and special relativity makes calculations upon curved space in 2 dimensions. That is why the math shows that time is slower closer to gravity. 

Dealing with Tesla physics, with an understanding of unified field frequency, time is seen to speed up closer to gravity.


The two should compliment each other, not come into conflict with one another.


So, there it is. Starship relativity. General and Special relativity deals with rocks in motion. Starship relativity deals with complex and sophisticated engines in motion, also in motion with the universe. 





See also: "Warp Drive Physics" just above the big picture of the schematics at the top of the Home Page.