(Updated 10/05/13)

(I've had to reflect and ponder this information, and to do it in resonance with time and space, in the open rather than behind closed doors to make sure that what COULD be viewed can be viewed with completeness and accuracy rather than leaving anything hanging lose in the breeze.  This post, I have included in my book, "Unified Mechanics of Ascension - The Building Physics of Lightdrives" to complete the information development of an appropriate follow through, to finish the book prior to the next steps of re-engineering development of the OTC-X1)




Black holes are sources of creation of very high frequency energy, just vibrating so fast we can't see them.

Water is created in some distant galaxies from the center of the galaxy, and creates a membrane around the galactic center which protects that rarified cell of intelligent life.

...

Black holes vibrate so fast we can't see them. They are source creation points. Black holes create matter and energy, hence in the Bible "first there was void, let there be light." But a hole is actually source light, and there is no void that is not filled with energy.

Black holes are so luminous and vibrating in such a higher dimension of light that to us in our slower-vibrating space and time, to our eyes it appears as utter darkness!  We think it's a hole that gobbles up matter and energy when in fact it is an upwelling of mass and energy!

...

The question arises:  do black holes actually eat stars? Or do we have it backwards? Used to, physicists thought time slows down at the event horizon and stops, and when you cross the event horizon, all time passes by for infinity. But that's foolish, and always struck me as odd until I realized why. Time SPEED UP closer to a gravity source. That is General Relativity.

Why do you think that we can see into a black hole but when viewed sideways it is flat?

Like, nothing comes out the other side, theoretically.

Have you seen a black hole particle fountain? The black hole emits energies in very high frequency. That's why it "looks" flat, because we see the shape of the energy field through radio telescopes. The flatness of the accretion disk is the disintegration plane of matter, and at the poles is the integration flow of matter.  The hole is black because light escapes it, and is redirected from us. Otherwise it would be too bright to see it, but we are vibrating in a slower frequency of space and time, so we can't see the BRILLIANCE of the brightness of a black hole.

If time is moving very, very fast, you could look at our solar system and see the planets moving very, very fast around the sun, year by year passing by in seconds, if you were around a black hole but very far from it.

It has immense gravity, but that is different. It has immense vibration. Matter is at extreme high frequency near the hole.  In a ship, you'd be vibrating extremely fast, and its energy would start resonating with the ship. If you resonate high enough, THAT is the event horizon; it is the speed of vibration. 

It's a gravity generator, a mass generator, not squeezed down into a 2-D plane, or a 1-D singularity; and although it has toroidal characteristics, it exists in many more dimensions that we cannot detect.  Such a collapse is a re-folding within, than an unfolding without, or into.  As it collapses, it expands.  The tidal forces of energy expand.

Electrodynamically speaking, the poles move through each other in the center, passing through and within, thus it is flat looking at it one-way, but it is the representation of the utron, and of the central accumulator and accretion plane.

The magnetic north and south poles of the star it once was (and still is), are now the particle fountains flowing forth out of the vortex generating center.


...

Are particles mono-polar?  If an electron moved backwards, it would be a positron, for example..   yet they also exist in pairs as two petals of the same flower, but they can be separated in a particle collision from the main flower and spin off on their own, yet their orbits are connected from the flower, and yet they travel in opposite directions, with opposite spins, as individual particals.  ..  yet forever entangled as twins. 

It doesn't mean they are separate, even at great distance.  Every electron has behind it a positron, and every positron has behind it an electron, but the difference itself is the Mirror, which is 1.11111111111

If you reverse the spin of one, at the same time, at no matter what distance the particles are away from each other, SIMULTANEOUSLY the other twin partical's spin reverses. 

David Sereda has examined the "quantum difference" as the ratio of symmetry to be 1.1111111111  ...  see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhXGI56eHN8



I don't view electrons and protons as mono-polar.  I view their charge as the direction of their inertia, their manifestation.  But, the physics of Otis T. Carr suggests they may be.  Electrons are anti to positrons, what's the difference?  There is a slight difference, a different spin direction, and a slightly different speed ...   the positron is slightly smaller than the electron, and the ratio of their difference is 1.1111111111.   That number comes up a LOT in the natural ways of the Universe. 




Quantum mechanics relies too heavly on the quantum vacuum, or quantum void, which is the worst direction really..  There is never any void that is not filled with energy, and instead of things coming in and out of a void, which is ludicrous, particles come in and out of Source Energy, Source Creation, entering and leaving the universe as twins.

That flaw in quantum mechanics uses existing technology which consumes matter and leaves a void, which is a different type of energy, more like a negative universe, and not very pleasant.

The very idea of creation from nothing is okay, it's a phenomenal paradox of creation, but the very idea of creation coming from void is not kind.  Because void is something.  Why must it be so, that light was born out of darkness, out of void?  It's easier to see that darkness is light's own shadow and that light is all present.  Any vibration of matter is light.  All matter is energy and vibrates.  There is no place where matter stops vibrating and energy ceases to exist.  Energy is CONSTANTLY created, and never can be destroyed.  So there is no void, no quantum vacuum.  What is it?  Creative Source.  "Quantum" Source Point Creation.



~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ .

Dark matter behaves in similar ways to a black hole, in that an obvious luminous body can't be seen to create it. Black holes can be seen as luminous through gravity and electromagnetic telescopes, however, even though the naked eye cannot see it because it is vibrating too fast.

Dark matter is mass-energy; vibrating energy fields, vibrating faster than normal luminous bodies, "cloaked" in invisibility at a higher frequency than the Human visual range of the light spectrum.

Tesla had a theory of electromagnetic gravity that remains classified to this day.  It involved rotating magnetic fields.

The MEG for example (see the bottom of the Tesla Power article on the Free Energy / Tesla page), when a load is pulled, it pulls more energy from the active vacuum, until it eventually caps off, and then very unusual things happen.  

I've noticed this accidentally with the Tesla Tower and other energy experiments of mine, that a current will flow so as long as there is a load; and a current will flow to ground and continue to flow to ground from the tower, so as long as that circuit is unbroken.  That deals with negative energy.

In my original Tesla tower experiments, there was energy being generated that could be tapped as it flows to ground, but once that connection was broken, the energy was gone.  

In an electromagnetic generator experiment of mine, I had obtained an old capacitor that had been sitting around outside for many years, and so I hooked it up.  The generator produced more energy with less effort, but as soon as I stopped the generator, and went to restart it, all that excess energy was gone.  

Imagine what rotating MEG assemblies can do spinning around, and then we've got something similar to the OTC-X1.  Superconductors levitate.  An effect of negative energy in some situations also will cause the generator to ice up and levitate (as seen in private tests under certain conditions tuned to certain frequencies).  So we see some relations, here.  Everything has frequency, even magnets.  A magnet can be tuned to generate its magnetic field at a certain frequency, for example when a magnet is being made.

Edward Leedskalnin noticed that gravity and electromagnetism were directly related, in that an electromagnetic field could be applied in a wire, and that could magnetize nearby pieces of steel fishing line, and that the steel fishing line would demonstrate a spin reversal when crossing over the plumb and level axis of the wire (crossing on either side of vertical, or above and below the horizontal planes relative with Earth's gravity field).  

When the wire was energized, the tips of the steel fishing line would either curl to the left or to the right as it crossed the exact horizontal or vertical planes of the wire.  So hold the fishing line to the side of a wire, and drop it below level, or raise it above the level plane; or hold the fishing line to the left, and cross over the plumb axis to the right side of the wire.  All this goes to show that electromagnetic fields and currents do respond to gravity, and the reason is because gravity is another dimension of electromagnetism.

There's a lot of research one could look up about electromagnetic gravity, in fact.  It can be said that all fundamental forces are electromagnetic in one way or another, and all relates to electromagnetism, in varying dimensions of action.  

All of this above has been discussed at some place in this website.




Here are some links to aid one in exploring electromagnetic mass and electromagnetic gravity:
​

​http://www.holoscience.com/wp/electric-gravity-in-an-electric-universe/​

​http://www.netowne.com/technology/important/

https://teslaresearch.jimdo.com/

https://www.paradox-paradigm.nl/?page_id=325

​https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.5619



.......


People have accused me of not understanding this technology I rely heavily upon.  I'll admit, some of it I do understand, and I understand what must exist, in order for the technology to exist.  But all of the proofs and mathematics and such is overshadowed by a far easier and more simplistic way to test these technologies, and that is simply to back-engineer them.  John Searle's SEG and the OTC-X1 are two marvels which have sufficient evidence to conclude that they are possible; and some people working with the SEG have seen it work.  The Russians have done work with the SEG and have seen that it reduces its own weight to zero.  

​Townsend Brown's work has actually been demonstrated, however, and di-electrostatic gravity does work.  

I'm planning on publishing Tesla tower Ley-line negative energy technology in 2 - 5 years here on this website.  I'll see what happens afterwards; however afterwards, the OTC-X1 should have achieved sufficient development through other private research and developers, I'm hoping.  I may however choose to take an entirely different path toward spirituality and metaphysics.  

I've done a lot of work on this website to get this technology up to a point of where we can understand what we're dealing with, to encourage people to build it and test it, instead of theorizing about building and testing it, and battling over their own beliefs of "will it work; am I wasting my time," etc.  It's not a waste of time, as long as there is sufficient evidence to show it can work.  But you won't see any of this in any mainstream university, because a university setting will not include a back-engineering curriculum to get something to work, without a way to truly understand why it works.  

However, if one has experience in these matters, then one's intuition will serve one much more in these capacities as an inventor, rather than as a scholar.  An inventor rarely comes up with a proof first, but just has a belief, an idea, and the motivation to try something; because invention is that which can begin to establish an understanding of new technology, because an inventor will try things based on intuition most often in contrary to modern accepted ideology and theory.  I think inventing is a far easier way to understand the universe, rather than theory.  However at least SOME theory must exist prior, otherwise no invention could be conceived, so in order to try.

Step one:  utrons

This will take a couple of years.



I'm happy with the design.

I hope this website is readable and useful.  It includes NASA's theories, Tesla's, Otis T. Carr's (Telsa's apprentice) and others, and my own.

I'm very surprised, particularly how everything fits together.  At least it's a good road map toward building the OTC-X1, and then experimenting with additional upgrades, and other designs such as X2, and X3. 

...

I believe there are a few things worth exploring:  The Hendershot generator (Black Box), self-charging capacitors and electrets, and vortex - plasma energy systems.  I'm pretty sure all that will take some time.  The Hendershot generator is Earth-based, requiring a planetary magnetic field.  Too many of them all over the place might disturb the Earth's magnetic field, and I wonder how many things we have already that contribute to Earth changes.  I'd like to post a link to yet another working magnetic motor, also:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI3227d5Css

There was one built by a couple of guys in Australia, but that hasn't gone anywhere that I know of.  The one in the link has a good amount of horsepower that could provide power outside the Earth's magnetosphere where solar panels are not practical.  I'm sure we have more advanced technology than this in secret and in private. 

...

It is ironic at how much time and money goes into free energy technology, and how profitable it can be to everyone, and to the environment, and to our educations and enlightened living.  Energy is always created in abundance and never can be destroyed. 

It's important to be safe and responsible, though, to discern and be wise instead of reckless.  Life systems have their own safeguards built-in.  How life is affected is important, too.  It's a slow process, and as the unnatural tendency of Humans to destroy instead of create is the road out of ignorance and into enlightenment, we find ourselves living in a time of collapse simultaneous with a time of re-birth.  There is nothing to fear because there are multiple parallel realities occuring simultaneously which means we don't have to experience loss in order to also experience gain.  There is no loss, and yet there is everything to gain.

Respect and honor to life is the key to harmony with all peoples, and any gift is not what one wants to give another, but what another wants to receive.  I'm not saying this is for all people unless fear has been overcome by all people.  And so it is what it is, and by walking paths of Love, people can find their ways (me included).

People like their ways, and it is not for me to tell people otherwise.  What can be profitable to some can be hurtful to others, emotionally, mentally, and culturally.  I for one find it difficult to relate to many people about these things, but then again to many people I can.  There is a balance in respecting people's ways and choices.  A walk-about on Earth flows with all changes, all hopes and dreams, remaining centered to what may come, and to what may already be.  How we can be, and how we are, is what it is, and it is only up to the individual to choose, wisely.  What is in the past already has been, yet it is the future which when one is there can look back and see the past has been what led to it.  Thus the past too, is always in motion, as is the future, and where one is [in the] now.



The sum of the probable pasts influences the current present. QED. A future event requires there to be a past timeline to achieve it. The future creates the past, and the present moment exists in all pasts and all futures as a probable place in time.

                   ...   Looks like a flying spaceport!

      Much Peace and Joy and Love